1.1 The notion of Schur convexity was first introduced by Schur in 1923 1.. The following definition for Schur convex or concave can be found in 1, 3, 7 and the references therein.. F is
Trang 1Volume 2009, Article ID 493759, 15 pages
doi:10.1155/2009/493759
Research Article
Schur-Convexity for a Class of Symmetric
Functions and Its Applications
1 School of Teacher Education, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China
2 Department of Mathematics, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Yu-Ming Chu,chuyuming2005@yahoo.com.cn
Received 16 May 2009; Accepted 14 September 2009
Recommended by Jozef Banas
Forx x1, x2, , xn ∈ R n
, the symmetric functionφn x, r is defined by φ n x, r φ n x1,
x2, , xn;r 1≤i1<i2···<i r ≤nr
j1 x i j /1xi j1/r, wherer 1, 2, , n and i1, i2, , inare positive integers In this article, the Schur convexity, Schur multiplicative convexity and Schur harmonic convexity ofφn x, r are discussed As applications, some inequalities are established by use of the
theory of majorization
Copyrightq 2009 W.-F Xia and Y.-M Chu This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
1 Introduction
Throughout this paper we useR nto denote then-dimensional Euclidean space over the field
of real numbers andR n {x1, x2, , xn : x i > 0, i 1, 2, , n} In particular, we use R to
denoteR1.
For the sake of convenience, we use the following notation system
Forx x1, x2, , xn , y y1, y2, , yn ∈ R n, andα > 0, let
x y x1 y1, x2 y2, , x n y n,
xy x1y1, x2y2, , x n y n,
αx αx1, αx2, , αxn ,
x αx α
1, x α
2, , x α n
,
1
1
x1, x1
2, , x1 n
,
Trang 2logx logx1, log x2, , log xn,
e x e x1, e x2, , e x n .
1.1
The notion of Schur convexity was first introduced by Schur in 1923 1 It has many important applications in analytic inequalities2 7, combinatorial optimization 8, isoperimetric problem for polytopes 9, linear regression 10, graphs and matrices 11, gamma and digamma functions12, reliability and availability 13, and other related fields The following definition for Schur convex or concave can be found in 1, 3, 7 and the references therein
convex function if
for each pair ofn-tuples x x1, , xn and y y1, , yn on E, such that x is majorized
k
i1
x i≤k
i1
y i , k 1, 2, , n − 1, n
i1
x in
i1
y i ,
1.3
wherex idenotes theith largest component in x F is called Schur concave if −F is Schur
convex
The notation of multiplicative convexity was first introduced by Montel 14 The Schur multiplicative convexity was investigated by Niculescu 15, Guan 7, and Chu et
al.16
called a Schur multiplicatively convex function onE if
for each pair of n-tuples x x1, x2, , xn and y y1, y2, , yn on E, such that x is
logarithmically majorized byy in symbols log x ≺ log y, that is,
k
i1
x i≤ k
i1
y i , k 1, 2, , n − 1, n
i1
x i n
i1
y i
1.5
HoweverF is called Schur multiplicatively concave if 1/F is Schur multiplicatively convex.
Trang 3In paper 17, Anderson et al discussed an attractive class of inequalities, which arise from the notion of harmonic convex functions Here, we introduce the notion of Schur harmonic convexity
n ≥ 2 be a set A real-valued function F on E is called a Schur
harmonic convex function if
for each pair ofn-tuples x x1, x2, , xn and y y1, y2, , yn on E, such that 1/x ≺ 1/y.
The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the Schur convexity, Schur multiplicative convexity, and Schur harmonic convexity of the following symmetric function:
φ n x, r φ n x1, x2, , x n;r
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
xi j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
wherex x1, x2, , xn ∈ R n n ≥ 2, r 1, 2, , n, and i1, i2, , ir are positive integers As applications, some inequalities are established by use of the theory of majorization
2 Lemmas
In order to establish our main results we need several lemmas, which we present in this section
The following lemma is so-called Schur’s condition which is very useful for determining whether or not a given function is Schur convex or Schur concave
function If f is differentiable in R n , then f is Schur convex if and only if
xi − x j∂f
∂f
∂xj
for all i, j 1, 2, , n and x x1, , xn ∈ R n Also f is Schur concave if and only if 2.1 is
reversed for all i, j 1, 2, , n and x x1, , xn ∈ R n
Here, f is a symmetric function in R n
reduced to
x1− x2 ∂f
∂x1 −∂x ∂f
2
Trang 4
Lemma 2.3 see 7,16 Let f : R n
→ Rbe a continuous symmtric function If f is differentiable
in R n , then f is Schur multiplicatively convex if and only if
logx1− log x2
x1∂f
∂x1 − x2∂f
∂x2
for all x x1, x2, , x n ∈ R n Also f is Schur multiplicatively concave if and only if 2.3 is
reversed.
f is Schur harmonic convex if and only if
x1− x2
x2 1
∂f
∂x1 − x2 2
∂f
∂x2
for all x x1, x2, , x n ∈ R n Also f is Schur harmonic concave if and only if 2.4 is reversed.
convex if and only ifFx 1/f1/x : R n → Ris Schur concave
This fact,Lemma 2.1andRemark 2.2together with elementary calculation imply that Lemma 2.4is true
i1 xi s If c ≥ s, then
c − x
1
nc/s − 1 ,
c − x2
nc/s − 1 , ,
c − xn nc/s − 1
≺ x1, x2, , xn x. 2.5
andn
i1 xi s If c ≥ 0, then
c x
1
nc/s 1 ,
c x2
nc/s 1 , ,
c xn nc/s 1
≺ x1, x2, , xn x. 2.6
i1 x i s If 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1, then
s − λx
1
s − λx2
n − λ , ,
s − λxn
n − λ
3 Main Results
.
x1− x2∂φ n x, r
∂x1 − ∂φn x, r
∂x2
for allx x1, x2, , x n ∈ R nandr 1, 2, , n.
Trang 5The proof is divided into four cases.
Case 1 If r 1, then 1.7 leads to
φ n x, 1 φ n x1, x2, , x n; 1 n
i1
x i
However3.2 and elementary computation lead to
x1− x2∂φ n x, 1
∂x1 −∂φ n ∂x x, 1
2
−x1− x221 x1 x2
x1x21 x11 x2 φn x, 1 ≤ 0. 3.3
Case 2 If n ≥ 2 and r n, then 1.7 yields
φ n x, n φ n x1, x2, , x n;n
n
i1
xi
1 x i
1/n
From3.4 and elementary computation, we have
x1− x2∂φ n x, n
∂x1 −∂φ n ∂x x, n
2
−x1− x222 x1 x2
n1 x121 x22
n
i1
x i
1 x i
1/n−1
≤ 0. 3.5
φn x, 2 φ n x1, x2, · · · , xn; 2
x
1
1 x1 x2
1 x2
1/2⎡
⎣ n
j3
x1
1 x1 x j
1 x j
1/2⎤
⎦φ n−1 x2, x3, , xn; 2
x
2
1 x2 x1
1 x1
1/2⎡
⎣ n
j3
x2
1 x2 x j
1 x j
1/2⎤
⎦φ n−1 x1, x3, , x n; 2
3.6
Trang 6Elementary computation and3.6 yield
x1− x2∂φ n x, 2
∂x1 −∂φn ∂x x, 2
2
− x1− x22
1 x11 x2
φn x, 2
2
×
⎡
⎣ 2 x1 x2
x1 x2 2x1x2 n
j3
1 x1 x2 3 2x1 2x2x j1 x j
x1 x j 2x1xjx2 x j 2x2xj
⎤
⎦ ≤ 0.
3.7
φ n x, r φ n x1, x2, , x n;r
φ n−1 x2, x3, , x n;r
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−1 ≤n
⎛
⎝ x1
1 x1 r−1
j1
xi j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−2 ≤n
⎛
⎝ x1
1 x1 x2
1 x2 r−2
j1
x i j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
φ n−1 x1, x3, , x n;r
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−1 ≤n
⎛
⎝ x2
1 x2 r−1
j1
x i j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−2 ≤n
⎛
⎝ x1
1 x1 x2
1 x2 r−2
j1
xi j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r ,
3.8
x1− x2∂φ n x, r
∂x1 − ∂φn ∂x x, r
2
− x1− x22
1 x121 x22
×
⎡
⎢
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−2 ≤n
2x1x2
x1/1x1 x2/1x2 r−2 j1xi j /1x i j
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−1 ≤n
1x1x22x1x2r−1 j1xi j /1xi j
x1/1x1 r−1
j1
x i j /1x i jx2/1x2 r−1
j1
x i j /1 x i j
⎤
⎥
×φ n x, r r ≤ 0.
3.9 Therefore,3.1 follows from Cases1 4and the proof ofTheorem 3.1is completed
Trang 7For the Schur multiplicative convexity or concavity ofφn x, r, we have the following
theorem
logx1− log x2
x1
∂φ n x, r
∂φ n x, r
∂x2
for allx x1, x2, , n ∈ 1, ∞ nandr 1, 2, , n Then proof is divided into four cases Case 1 If r 1, then 3.2 leads to
logx1− log x2
x1
∂φ n x, 1
∂φ n x, 1
∂x2
−
logx1− log x2
x1− x2
1 x11 x2 φn x, 1 ≤ 0.
3.11
Case 2 If r n, n ≥ 2, then 3.4 yields
logx1− log x2
x1∂φn x, n
∂x1 − x2∂φn x, n
∂x2
logx1− log x2
x1− x2
n1 x121 x22 1 − x1x2
n
i1
xi
1 x i
1/n−1
≤ 0.
3.12
Case 3 If n ≥ 3 and r 2, then 3.6 implies
logx1− log x2
x1∂φn x, 2
∂x1 − x2∂φn x, 2
∂x2
φ n x, 2
2
logx1− log x2
x1− x2
1 x121 x22
×
⎡
⎣ 1− x1x2
x1/1 x1 x2/1 x2
n
j3
−x1x2 1 − x1x2x j /1 x j
x1/1 x1 x j/1 x j
x2/1 x2 x j/1 x j
⎤
⎦ ≤ 0.
3.13
Trang 8Case 4 If n ≥ 4 and 3 ≤ r ≤ n − 1, then from 3.8 we have
logx1− log x2
x1∂φn x, r
∂x1 − x2∂φn x, r
∂x2
logx1− log x2
x1− x2
1 x121 x22
×
⎡
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−2 ≤n
1− x1x2
x1/1 x1 x2/1 x2 r−2 j1xi j /1 x i j
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−1 ≤n
−x1x21 − x1x2r−1 j1xi j /1 x i j
x1/1x1 r−1 j1x i j /1 x i jx2/1x2 r−1 j1x i j /1 x i j
⎤
⎥
⎦
× φn x, r r ≤ 0.
3.14 Therefore,Theorem 3.2follows from3.10 and Cases1 4
in0, ∞ nandφ n x, n is Schur multiplicatively convex in 0, 1 n
R n
x1− x2
x2 1
∂φ n x, r
2
∂φ n x, r
∂x2
for allx x1, x2, , xn ∈ R nandr 1, 2, , n.
The proof is divided into four cases
Case 1 If r 1, then from 3.2 we have
x1− x2
x2 1
∂φn x, 1
2
∂φn x, 1
∂x2
x1− x22
1 x11 x2φn x, 1 ≥ 0. 3.16
Case 2 If n ≥ 2 and r n, then 3.4 leads to
x1− x2
x2
1
∂φn x, n
2
∂φn x, n
∂x2
x1− x22x1 x2 2x1x2
n1 x121 x22
n
i1
x i
1 x i
1/n−1
≥ 0.
3.17
Trang 9Case 3 If n ≥ 3 and r 2, then 3.6 yields
x1− x2
x2 1
∂φn x, 2
2
∂φn x, 2
∂x2
x1− x22
1 x11 x2
φn x, 2
2
×
⎡
⎣1 n
j3
x1x2 x1x j x2x j 3x1x2x j1 x j
x1 x j 2x1xjx2 x j 2x2xj
⎤
⎦
≥ 0.
3.18
Case 4 If n ≥ 4 and 3 ≤ r ≤ n − 1, then 3.8 implies
x1− x2
x2
1
∂φ n x, r
2
∂φ n x, r
∂x2
x1− x22
1 x121 x22
φn x, r
r
×
⎡
⎢
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−2 ≤n
x1 x2 2x1x2
x1/1 x1 x2/1 x2 r−2
j1
x i j /1 x i j
3≤i 1<i2<···<i r−1 ≤n
x1x2x1x22x1x2r−2
j1
x i j /1x i j
x1/1x1r−1 j1xi j /1 x i j
x2/1 x2r−1 j1xi j /1 xi j
⎤
⎥
≥ 0.
3.19 Therefore,3.15 follows from Cases1 4and the proof ofTheorem 3.4is completed
4 Applications
In this section, we establish some inequalities by use of Theorems3.1,3.2and3.4and the theory of majorization
i1 x i ,H n x n/n
i1 1/x i , and r ∈ {1, 2, , n}, then
1 φ n x, r ≤ φ n c − x/nc/s − 1, r for c ≥ s;
2 φ n x, r ≥ φ n cH n x − 1/cx − 1x, r for c ≥n
i1 1/x i ;
3 φ n x, r ≤ φ n c x/nc/s 1, r for c ≥ 0;
4 φ n x, r ≥ φ n cH n x 1/cx 1x, r for c ≥ 0;
5 φ n x, r ≤ φ n s − λx/n − λ, r for 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1;
Trang 106 φ n x, r ≥ φ n n − λ/n i1 1/x i − λ/x , r for 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1;
7 φ n x, r ≤ φ n s λx/n λ, r for 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1;
8 φ n x, r ≥ φ n n λ/n i1 1/x i λ/x , r for 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1.
the fact that
s λx
1
s λx2
n λ , ,
s λxn
n λ
1≤i 1<i2<···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
x i j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
r A An x
n 1 x
n!/r·r!n−r!
;
1≤i 1<i2<···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≥r 1
An 1 x
n!/r·r!n−r!
.
4.2
Proof We clearly see that
A n x, A n x, , A n x ≺ x1, x2, , xn x. 4.3
Therefore,Theorem 4.2i follows from 4.3 andTheorem 3.1together with1.7, and Theorem 4.2ii follows from 4.3 andTheorem 3.4together with1.7
If we taker 1 inTheorem 4.2i and r n inTheorem 4.2, respectively, then we have the following corollary
i G n x
Gn 1 x ≤
A n x
An 1 x;
ii A n x
1 x
≤ A n x
An 1 x;
iii A n
1
1 x
≥ A 1
n 1 x .
4.4
i1 x i 1 in Corollary 4.3i, then we obtain the Weierstrass inequality:see 20, page 260
n
i1
1
xi 1
Trang 11
Theorem 4.5 If x x1, x2, , xn ∈ R n
and r ∈ {1, 2, , n}, then
1≤i 1<i2<···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
xi j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≥
1 H n x
n!/r·r!n−r!
;
1≤i 1<i2<···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
1 H n x
n!/r·r!n−r!
.
4.6
Proof We clearly see that
1
H n x ,
1
H n x , ,
1
H n x
≺
1
x1, x1
2, , x1 n
Therefore,Theorem 4.5i follows from 4.7 andTheorem 3.4together with1.7, and Theorem 4.5ii follows from 4.7 andTheorem 3.1together with1.7
If we take r 1 and r n inTheorem 4.5, respectively, then we get the following corollary
i G Gn x
n 1 x ≥
1 H n x;
ii G n 1 x ≥ 1 H n x;
iii A n x
1 x
≥ Hn x
1 H n x;
iv A n
1
1 x
1 H n x .
4.8
1≤i 1<i2<···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
x i j
1 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
1 G n x
n!/r·r!n−r!
Proof We clearly see that
logGn x, G n x, , G n x ≺ logx1, x2, , x n . 4.10 Therefore,Theorem 4.7follows from4.10,Theorem 3.2, and1.7
Trang 12If we take r 1 and r n inTheorem 4.7, respectively, then we get the following corollary
i A n x
1 x
≤ G n x
1 G n x;
ii G n 1 x ≥ 1 G n x.
4.11
Corollary 4.8i is reversed for x ∈ 0, 1 nand inequality inCorollary 4.8ii is true for x ∈ R n
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1 x i j
2 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≥
1n
i1 xi
2n i1 xi
r − 1
2
n−1!/r!n−r!
× r
2
n−1!/r·r!n−r−1!
for 1 ≤ r ≤ n − 1;
ii n
i1
1 x i
2 x i ≥ 1
n
i1 xi
2n i1 x i
n − 1
2 ;
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1
2 x i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
2n i1 x i
r − 1
2
n−1!/r−1!n−r!
× r
2
n−1!/r·r!n−r−1!
for 1 ≤ r ≤ n − 1;
iv n
i1
1
2 x i ≤
1
2n i1 x i
n − 1
2 .
4.12
1 x1, 1 x2, , 1 x n ≺
1n
i1
x i , 1, 1, , 1
point in the interior of A If B i is the intersection point of straight line A i P and hyperplane i
A1A2· · · A i−1Ai1 · · · A n1, i 1, 2, , n 1, then for r ∈ {1, 2, , n 1} one has
1≤i<i ···<i ≤n1
⎛
⎝r
j1
PBi j
Ai j Bi j PB i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
r
n 2
n1!/r·r!n−r1!
;
Trang 13ii
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n1
⎛
⎝r
j1
A i j B i j
Ai j Bi j PB i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≥
r
n 2
n1!/r·r!n−r1!
;
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n1
⎛
⎝r
j1
PAi j
A i j B i j PA i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
r
2n 1
n1!/r·r!n−r1!
;
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n1
⎛
⎝r
j1
A i j B i j
Ai j Bi j PA i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≥
r
2n 1
n1!/r·r!n−r1!
.
4.14
i1 PB i /A i B i 1 and n1 i1 PA i /A i B i n, these identical
equations imply
1
n 1 ,
1
n 1 , ,
1
n 1
≺
PB
1
A1B1, PB2
A2B2, , A PBn1
n1 B n1
,
n
n 1 ,
n
n 1 , ,
n
n 1
≺
PA
1
A1B1, PA2
A2B2, , An1Bn1 PA n1
.
4.15
Therefore,Theorem 4.11follows from4.15, Theorems3.1,3.4, and1.7
different from theirs
σ1, σ2, , σn are the eigenvalues and singular values of A, respectively If A is a positive definite Hermitian matrix and r ∈ {1, 2, , n}, then
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
λ i j
1 λ i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
r
trA
n trA
n!/r·r!n−r!
;
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1
1 λ i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≥
r
n trA
n!/r·r!n−r!
;
1≤i 1<i2···<i r ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1 λ i j
2 λ i j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
r
n detI A
1n
detI A
n!/r·r!n−r!
;
1≤i<i ···<i ≤n
⎛
⎝r
j1
1
trA λi j
⎞
⎠
1/r
≤
r
1
trA √n
detA
n!/r·r!n−r!
;