Volume 2010, Article ID 879821, 12 pagesdoi:10.1155/2010/879821 Research Article Global Optimal Regularity for the Parabolic Polyharmonic Equations Fengping Yao Department of Mathematics
Trang 1Volume 2010, Article ID 879821, 12 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/879821
Research Article
Global Optimal Regularity for
the Parabolic Polyharmonic Equations
Fengping Yao
Department of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200436, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Fengping Yao,yfp1123@math.pku.edu.cn
Received 21 February 2010; Accepted 3 June 2010
Academic Editor: Vicentiu D Radulescu
Copyrightq 2010 Fengping Yao This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
We show the global regularity estimates for the following parabolic polyharmonic equation
u t −Δm
u f inRn × 0, ∞, m ∈ Zunder proper conditions Moreover, it will be verified
that these conditions are necessary for the simplest heat equation u t − Δu f inRn × 0, ∞.
1 Introduction
Regularity theory in PDE plays an important role in the development of second-order elliptic and parabolic equations Classical regularity estimates for elliptic and parabolic
the theory of partial differential equations, are two fundamental estimates for elliptic and parabolic equations and the basis for the existence, uniqueness, and regularity of solutions
regularity estimates in Orlicz spaces, for the following parabolic polyharmonic problems:
where x x1, , x n, Δ n
i1∂2/∂x i2 and m is a positive integer Since the 1960s, the
need to use wider spaces of functions than Sobolev spaces arose out of various practical problems Orlicz spaces have been studied as the generalization of Sobolev spaces since they
Trang 2We denote the distance inRn1as
δ z1, z2 max|x1− x2|, |t1− t2|1/2m
for z1 x1, t1, z2 x2, t2 1.3
and the cylinders inRn1as
Q R B R×−R 2m , R 2m
D x ν u ∂ |ν| u
∂ ν1
x1· · · ∂ ν n
x n
where ν ν1, ν2, , ν n is a multiple index, ν i ≥ 0 i 1, 2, , n, and |ν| n
i1|ν i| For
parabolic equations with the help of fundamental solutions and Green functions Moreover,
Q 1/6
φ
D 2m u 2
dz
Q 1/6
φ
|u t|2
dz ≤ C
Q 1/2
φ f 2
dz
Q 1/2
φ
|u|2
for
φ x |x| p/2 with p > 2,1.6 is reduced to the local L pestimates In fact, we can replace 2 of
φ| · |2 in 1.6 by the power of p1for any p1> 1.
we are interested in the estimate like
Rn ×0,∞ φ D 2m u
dz
Rn ×0,∞ φ |u t |dz ≤ C
Rn ×0,∞ φ f dz, 1.8
Trang 3framework and iteration-covering procedure as in6,12 , more complicated analysis should
be carefully carried out with a proper dilation of the unbounded domain
Here for the reader’s convenience, we will give some definitions on the general Orlicz spaces
Definition 1.1 A convex function φ :R → Ris said to be a Young function if
Definition 1.2 A Young function φ is said to satisfy the globalΔ2condition, denoted by φ ∈
Δ2, if there exists a positive constant K such that for every s > 0,
there exists a number a > 1 such that for every s > 0,
φ s ≤ φ as
Example 1.3 i φ1s 1 |s| log1 |s| − |s| ∈ Δ2, but φ1s /∈ ∇2
ii φ2s e |s| − |s| − 1 ∈ ∇2, but φ2s /∈ Δ2
iii φ3s |s| α 1 | log |s|| ∈ Δ2∩ ∇2, α > 1.
Remark 1.4 If a function φ satisfies1.10 and 1.11, then
φ θ1s ≤ Kθ α1
1 φ s, φ θ2s ≤ 2aθ α2
for every s > 0 and 0 < θ2≤ 1 ≤ θ1< ∞, where α1 log2K and α2 loga2 1
Remark 1.5 Under condition1.12, it is easy to check that φ satisfies
s→ 0
φ s
s→ ∞
s
Definition 1.6 Assume that φ is a Young function Then the Orlicz class K φRn is the set of
Rn
φ g dx < ∞. 1.14
The Orlicz space L φRn is the linear hull of K φRn
Trang 4Lemma 1.7 see 2 Assume that φ ∈ Δ2∩ ∇2and g ∈ L φ Ω Then
1 K φ Ω L φ Ω,
0 Ω is dense in L φ Ω,
3
Ωφ g dx∞
0
x∈ Ω : g > μ d
φ
μ
Now let us state the main results of this work
Theorem 1.8 Assume that φ is a Young function and u satisfies
u t x, t − Δux, t fx, t in R n × 0, ∞,
Then if the following inequality holds
Rn ×0,∞ φ D2u
dz
Rn ×0,∞ φ |u t |dz ≤ C
Rn ×0,∞ φ f dz, 1.17
One has
Theorem 1.9 Assume that φ ∈ Δ2∩∇2 If u is the solution of1.1-1.2 with f ∈ L φRn ×0, ∞,
then1.8 holds.
Remark 1.10 We would like to point out that theΔ2condition is necessary In fact, if the local
we have
Q 1/6
Q 1/6 φ
⎛
⎝
∂2u
∂x1∂x2
2⎞
⎠dz
≤ C
Q 1/2
φ f 2
dz
Q 1/2
φ
|u|2
dz
≤ C
Q
φ sdz,
1.20
Trang 5which implies that
In this section we show that φ satisfies the global∇2condition if u satisfies1.16 and estimate
1.17 is true
Proof Now we consider the special case in1.16 when
0Rn1 is a cutoff function satisfying
u x, t
t
0
1
4πt − s n/2
Rn
e −|x−y|2/4 t−s f
y, s
dy ds. 2.3
It follows from1.17, 2.1, and 2.2 that
Rn ×0,∞ φ |u t |dz ≤ C
Rn ×0,∞ φ f dz ≤ C1φ
ρ
4π n/2
t
0
1
t − s n2/2
B2
x − y 2
n
2
e −|x−y|2/4 t−s f
y, s
dy ds. 2.5
Define
D:z x, t ∈ R n × 0, ∞ : |x| > 4, |x| ≥ 4√nt
x − y 2
|x|2
Trang 6x − y ≥ |x| − y ≥ |x| − |x|
2· 4π n/2
t
0
1
t − s n2/2
B1
e −|x−y|2/4 t−s dy ds
2· 4π n/2
t
0
1
t − s
y ∈B1
e −|ξ|2/4 dξ ds ξ
x − y
t − s
2· 4π n/2
t
0
t − s n−2/2
2|x| n
y ∈B1
|ξ| n e −|ξ|2/4 dξ ds
≥ Cρ|x| −nt
0
t − s n−2/2 ds ≥ C2ρ |x| −n t n/2
2.9
D
φ
C2ρ |x| −n t n/2
dx dt ≤ C1φ
ρ
which implies that
1
1/n
4 √
n
φ
C2ρr −n
r n−1dr dt ≤ C1φ
ρ
By changing variable we conclude that, for any ρ > 0,
αρ
0
φ σ
σ2 dσ≤ C3φ
ρ
where α C24−n n −n/2 Let ρ2≥ ρ1and 0 < ε ≤ α/2 Then we conclude from 2.12 that
φ
ρ2
ρ2 ≥ 1
C3
αρ2
0
φ σ
σ2 dσ≥ 1
C3
αρ1
ερ1
φ σ
σ2 dσ
ερ1
C3
1
ερ1 − 1
αρ1 ≥ φ
ερ1
2C3ερ1.
2.13
φ
ρ
ρ ≥ 1
C3
αρ
ερ
φ σ
σ
1
σ dσ≥ φ
ε2ρ
2C2
3ε2ρln α
Trang 7where we choose that ρ1 ερ, ρ2 σ in 2.13 Set a 1/ε2 Then we have
φ
ρ
α√
a
2C2 3
aφ ρ
a
a
completes our proof
3 Proof of the Main Result
use the following two lemmas The first lemma is the following integral inequality
Lemma 3.1 see 6 Let φ ∈ Δ2∩∇2, g ∈ L φRn1, and p ∈ 1, α2, where α2is defined in1.12.
Then for any b1, b2> 0 one has
0
1
μ p
{z∈R n1 :|g|>b 1μ}
g p
dz d
φ
b2μ
≤ Cb1, b2, φ
Rn1φ g dz. 3.1 Moreover, we recall the following result
Lemma 3.2 see 10, Theorem 5.5 Assume that g ∈ L pRn × 0, ∞ for p > 1 There exists a
unique solution v ∈ W 2m,1
p Rn × 0, ∞ of 1.1-1.2 with the estimate
D 2m v
L pRn ×0,∞ v t L pRn ×0,∞ ≤ Cg
L pRn ×0,∞ 3.2
Moreover, we give one important lemma, which is motivated by the iteration-covering procedure in12 To start with, let u be a solution of 1.1-1.2 Let
p 1 α2
λ p0
Rn ×0,∞
D 2m u p
dz 1
Rn ×0,∞
f p
u λ u
λ0λ , f λ f
Trang 8for any λ > 0 Then u λis still the solution of1.1-1.2 with f λ replacing f Moreover, we
write
J λ Q −
Q
D 2m u λ p
dz1
−
Q
f λ p
E λ1 z∈ Rn × 0, ∞ : D 2m u λ > 1
Lemma 3.3 For any λ > 0, there exists a family of disjoint cylinders {Q ρ i z i}i∈Nwith z i x i , t i ∈
E λ 1 and ρ i ρz i , λ > 0 such that
J λ
Q ρ i z i 1, J λ
Q ρ z i< 1 for any ρ > ρ i , 3.8
i∈N
where Q 5ρ i z i : B 5ρ i x i × t i − 5ρ i2m , t i 5ρ i2m Moreover, one has
Q ρ i z i ≤ 2
{z∈Q ρi z i :|D 2m u λ|p >1/4}
D 2m u λ p
dz1
{z∈Q ρi z i :|f λ|p >/4}
f λ p
dz
Proof 1 Fix any λ > 0 We first claim that
sup
w∈Rn ×0,∞sup
ρ ≥ρ0J λ
where ρ0 ρ0λ > 0 satisfies λ p |Q ρ0| 1 To prove this, fix any w ∈ R n × 0, ∞ and ρ ≥ ρ0
J λ
Q ρ w≤ 1
λ p0λ p Q ρ w
Rn ×0,∞
D 2m u p
dz1
Rn ×0,∞
f p
dz
λ p Q ρ0 1.
3.12
lim
ρ→ 0J λ
Q ρ w> 1, 3.13
Trang 9which implies that there exists some ρ > 0 satisfying
J λ
Q ρ w> 1. 3.14 Therefore from3.11 we can select a radius ρ w ∈ 0, ρ0 such that
J λ
Q ρ w w 1, J λ
Q ρ w< 1 for any ρ > ρ w 3.15
Therefore, applying Vitali’s covering lemma, we can find a family of disjoint cylinders
{Q ρ i z i} such that 3.8 and 3.9 hold
−
Q ρi z i
D 2m u λ p
dz 1
−
Q ρi z i
f λ p
Therefore, by splitting the two integrals above as follows we have
Q ρ
i z i ≤
{z∈Q ρi z i :|D 2m u λ|p >1/4}
D 2m u λ p
dz
cQ ρ i z i 4
{z∈Q ρi z i :|f λ|p >/4}
f λ p
dz Q ρ i z i
3.17
Proof In the following by the elementary approximation argument as3,12 it is sufficient
In view ofLemma 3.3, given any λ > 0, we can construct a family of cylinders {Q ρ i z i}i∈N,
where z i x i , t i ∈ E λ 1 Fix i ≥ 1 It follows from 3.6 and 3.8 inLemma 3.3that
−
Q 10ρi z i
D 2m u λ p
dz ≤ 1, −
Q 10ρi z i
f λ p
Lemma 3.2, there exists a unique solution v ∈ W 2m,1
v t −Δ2m v f λ inRn × 0, ∞,
with the estimate
D 2m v
L pRn ×0,∞ ≤ Cf
λ
L pRn ×0,∞ 3.20
Trang 10Therefore we see that
D 2m v
L p Q 10ρi z i≤D 2m v
L pRn ×0,∞
≤ Cf
λ
L pRn ×0,∞
Cf λ
L p Q 10ρi z i.
3.21
−
Q 10ρi z i
D 2m w p
dz≤ 2p
−
Q 10ρi z i
D 2m v p
dz −
Q 10ρi z i
D 2m v p
dz
Q 10ρi z i
f λ p
dz ≤ C.
3.23
N1> 1 such that
sup
Q 5ρi z i
D 2m w ≤ N
Set μ λλ0 Therefore, we deduce from3.5 and 3.24 that
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m u > 2N
1μ
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m u λ > 2N
1
≤
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m w > N
1
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m v > N
1
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m v > N
1 ≤ 1
N1p
Q 5ρi z i
D 2m v p
dz.
3.25
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m u > 2N
1μ
≤ C
Q z
f λ p
dz ≤ C Q 10ρ
Trang 11Therefore, from3.10 inLemma 3.3we find that
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m u > 2N
1μ
μ p
{z∈Q ρi z i :|D 2m u|p >μ p /4}
D 2m u p
dz
{z∈Q ρi z i :|f|>μ p /4}
f p
dz
,
3.27
where C Cn, m Recalling the fact that the cylinders {Q ρ i z i}i∈Nare disjoint,
i∈N
Q 5ρ i z i ∪ negligible set ⊃ E λ1 z∈ Rn × 0, ∞ : D 2m u λ z > 1
z∈ Rn × 0, ∞ : D 2m u > 2N
1μ
i∈N
z ∈ Q 5ρ i z i : D 2m u > 2N
1μ
μ p
{z∈R n ×0,∞:|D 2m u|p >μ p /4}
D 2m u p
dz
{z∈R n ×0,∞:|f|>μ p /4}
f p dz
.
3.29
Rn ×0,∞ φ D 2m u
dz
0
z∈ Rn × 0, ∞ : D 2m u > 2N
1μ d
φ
2N1μ
≤ C
0
1
μ p
{z∈R n ×0,∞:|D 2m u|p >μ p /4}
D 2m u p
dz d
φ
2N1μ
C
0
1
μ p
{z∈R n ×0,∞:|f|>μ p /4}
f p
dz d
φ
2N1μ
.
3.30
Rn ×0,∞ φ D 2m u
dz ≤ C1
Rn ×0,∞ φ D 2m u
dz C2
Rn ×0,∞ φ f dz, 3.31
where C1 C1n, m, φ and C2 C2n, m, , φ Finally selecting a suitable ∈ 0, 1 such that
Trang 12The author wishes to thank the anonymous referee for offering valuable suggestions to
Moreover, the author wishes to thank the department of mathematics at Shanghai university
References
1 W Orlicz, “ ¨Uber eine gewisse Klasse von R¨aumen vom Typus B,” Bulletin International de l’Acad´emie
Polonaise S´erie A, vol 8, pp 207–220, 1932.
2 R A Adams and J J F Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, vol 140, Academic Press, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 2nd edition, 2003
3 S Byun, F Yao, and S Zhou, “Gradient estimates in Orlicz space for nonlinear elliptic equations,”
Journal of Functional Analysis, vol 255, no 8, pp 1851–1873, 2008.
4 H Jia, D Li, and L Wang, “Regularity of Orlicz spaces for the Poisson equation,” Manuscripta
Mathematica, vol 122, no 3, pp 265–275, 2007.
5 V Kokilashvili and M Krbec, Weighted inequalities in Lorentz and Orlicz spaces, World Scientific, River
Edge, NJ, USA, 1991
6 F Yao, “Regularity theory in Orlicz spaces for the parabolic polyharmonic equations,” Archiv der
Mathematik, vol 90, no 5, pp 429–439, 2008.
7 M M Rao and Z D Ren, Applications of Orlicz Spaces, vol 250 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and
Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
8 D Gilbarg and N Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer, Berlin,
Germany, 3rd edition, 1998
9 G M Lieberman, Second Order Parabolic Differential Equations, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA,
1996
10 V A Solonnikov, “On boundary value problems for linear parabolic systems of differential equations
of general form,” Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Imeni V A Steklova, vol 83, pp 3–163, 1965.
11 F.-P Yao and S.-L Zhou, “Schauder estimates for parabolic equation of bi-harmonic type,” Applied
Mathematics and Mechanics, vol 28, no 11, pp 1503–1516, 2007.
12 E Acerbi and G Mingione, “Gradient estimates for a class of parabolic systems,” Duke Mathematical
Journal, vol 136, no 2, pp 285–320, 2007.
... class="text_page_counter">Trang 12The author wishes to thank the anonymous referee for offering valuable suggestions to
Moreover, the. .. f
Trang 8for any λ > Then u λis still the solution of1.1-1.2... pRn ×0,∞ 3.20
Trang 10Therefore we see that
D 2m