Used under license from Shutterstock.com First published September, 2011 Printed in Croatia A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com Additional hard copies
Trang 1NUCLEAR POWER – CONTROL, RELIABILITY AND HUMAN FACTORS
Edited by Pavel V Tsvetkov
Trang 2Nuclear Power – Control, Reliability and Human Factors
Edited by Pavel V Tsvetkov
Published by InTech
Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Copyright © 2011 InTech
All chapters are Open Access articles distributed under the Creative Commons
Non Commercial Share Alike Attribution 3.0 license, which permits to copy,
distribute, transmit, and adapt the work in any medium, so long as the original
work is properly cited After this work has been published by InTech, authors
have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they
are the author, and to make other personal use of the work Any republication,
referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher No responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the published articles The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out
of the use of any materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book
Publishing Process Manager Petra Zobic
Technical Editor Teodora Smiljanic
Cover Designer Jan Hyrat
Image Copyright Ensuper, 2010 Used under license from Shutterstock.com
First published September, 2011
Printed in Croatia
A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com
Additional hard copies can be obtained from orders@intechweb.org
Nuclear Power – Control, Reliability and Human Factors, Edited by Pavel V Tsvetkov
p cm
ISBN 978-953-307-599-0
Trang 3free online editions of InTech
Books and Journals can be found at
www.intechopen.com
Trang 5Contents
Preface IX
Part 1 Instrumentation and Control 1
Chapter 1 Sensor Devices with High Metrological Reliability 3
Kseniia Sapozhnikova and Roald Taymanov
Chapter 2 Multi-Version FPGA-Based Nuclear
Power Plant I&C Systems: Evolution of Safety Ensuring 27
Vyacheslav Kharchenko, Olexandr Siora and Volodymyr Sklyar
Chapter 3 Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control 49
H.M Hashemian
Chapter 4 Design Considerations for the Implementation of
a Mobile IP Telephony System in a Nuclear Power Plant 67
J García-Hernández, J C Velázquez- Hernández,
C F García-Hernández and M A Vallejo-Alarcón
Chapter 5 Smart Synergistic Security
Sensory Network for Harsh Environments: Net4S 85
Igor Peshko
Chapter 6 An Approach to Autonomous
Control for Space Nuclear Power Systems 101
Richard Wood and Belle Upadhyaya
Chapter 7 Radiation-Hard and Intelligent
Optical Fiber Sensors for Nuclear Power Plants 119
Grigory Y Buymistriuc
Chapter 8 Monitoring Radioactivity
in the Environment Under Routine and Emergency Conditions 145
De Cort Marc
Trang 6VI Contents
Chapter 9 Origin and Detection
of Actinides: Where Do We Stand with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technique? 167
Mario De Cesare
Part 2 Reliability and Failure Mechanisms 187
Chapter 10 Evaluation of Dynamic J-R Curve for Leak Before
Break Design of Nuclear Reactor Coolant Piping System 189
Kuk-cheol Kim, Hee-kyung Kwon, Jae-seok Park and Un-hak Seong
Chapter 11 Feed Water Line
Cracking in Pressurized Water Reactor Plants 207
Somnath Chattopadhyay
Chapter 12 Degradation Due to Neutron
Embrittlement of Nuclear Vessel Steels:
A Critical Review about the Current Experimental and Analytical Techniques to Characterise the Material, with Particular Emphasis on Alternative Methodologies 215
Diego Ferreño, Iñaki Gorrochategui and Federico Gutiérrez-Solana
Chapter 13 Corrosion Monitoring
of the Steam Generators of V-th and VI-th Energy Blocks of Nuclear Power Plant “Kozloduy” 239
Nikolai Boshkov, Georgi Raichevski, Katja Minkova and Penjo Penev
Chapter 14 Collapse Behavior
of Moderately Thick Tubes Pressurized from Outside 257
Leone Corradi, Antonio Cammi and Lelio Luzzi
Chapter 15 Resistance of 10GN2MFA-A Low Alloy Steel to
Stress Corrosion Cracking in High Temperature Water 275
Karel Matocha, Petr Čížek, Ladislav Kander and Petr Pustějovský
Part 3 Component Aging 287
Chapter 16 Aging Evaluation for the Extension of
Qualified Life of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment 289
Pedro Luiz da Cruz Saldanha and Paulo Fernando F Frutuoso e Melo
Chapter 17 Non-Destructive Testing for
Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Components 311
Gerd Dobmann
Part 4 Plant Operation and Human Factors 339
Chapter 18 Human Aspects of NPP Operator Teamwork 341
Márta Juhász and Juliánna Katalin Soós
Trang 7Chapter 19 The Human Factors Approaches
to Reduce Human Errors in Nuclear Power Plants 377
Yong-Hee Lee, Jaekyu Park and Tong-Il Jang
Chapter 20 Virtual Control Desks for Nuclear Power Plants 393
Maurício Alves C Aghina, Antônio Carlos A Mól, Carlos Alexandre F Jorge, André C do Espírito Santo, Diogo V Nomiya, Gerson G Cunha, Luiz Landau,
Victor Gonçalves G Freitas and Celso Marcelo F Lapa
Chapter 21 Risk Assessment in Accident Prevention
Considering Uncertainty and Human Factor Influence 407
Katarína Zánická Hollá
Trang 9Preface
Due to economic growth and increasing population, energy demands must be satisfied
in a sustainable manner assuring inherent safety, efficiency and minimized environmental impact Nuclear power has long posed a dilemma for environmentalists and scientists alike On the one hand it is seen as a cheap, clean energy source whilst on the other some have concerns over its ability to dispose of radioactive waste Whichever viewpoint one may assume, nuclear power is at the forefront of clean energy technology and can be made available on a large scale to meet energy needs of the rapidly growing world
Today’s nuclear reactors are safe and highly efficient energy systems that give electricity and a multitude of co-generation energy products ranging from potable water to heat for industrial applications Meanwhile, a catastrophic earthquake and a tsunami in Japan led to the nuclear accident that forced us to rethink our approach to nuclear safety and design requirements It also encouraged the growing of interest for advanced nuclear energy systems and next generation nuclear reactors, inherently capable of withstanding natural disasters, avoiding catastrophic consequences and leaving no environmental impact Advances in reactor designs, materials and human-machine interfaces assure safety and reliability of emerging reactor technologies, eliminating possibilities for high-consequence human error, such as those which have occurred in the past New instrumentation and control technologies based in digital systems, novel sensors and measurement approaches facilitate safety, reliability and economic competitiveness of nuclear power options
Autonomous operation scenarios are becoming increasingly popular to consider for small modular systems designed for remote regions with limited industrial infrastructure or regions with no such infrastructure but with human population whose safety, prosperity and growth depend on a reliable energy supply
This book is one in a series of books on nuclear power published by InTech It consists
of four major sections and contains twenty-one chapters on topics from key subject areas pertinent to instrumentation and control, operation reliability, system aging and human-machine interfaces.The book opens with the section on instrumentation and control aspects of nuclear power The following sections and included chapters address selected issues in reliability and failure mechanisms, component aging, plant
Trang 10The goal of this book and the entire book series on nuclear power is to present nuclear power to our readers as a promising energy source that has a unique potential to meet energy demands with minimized environmental impact, near-zero carbon footprint, and competitive economics via robust potential applications
The book targets a broad potential readership group - students, researchers and specialists in the field - who are interested in learning about nuclear power The idea is
to facilitate intellectual cross-fertilization between field experts and non-field experts taking advantage of methods and tools developed by both groups The book will hopefully inspire future research and development efforts, innovation by stimulating ideas
We hope our readers will enjoy the book and will find it both interesting and useful
Pavel V Tsvetkov
Department of Nuclear Engineering
Texas A&M University United States of America
Trang 13Part 1
Instrumentation and Control
Trang 151
Sensor Devices with High Metrological Reliability
Kseniia Sapozhnikova and Roald Taymanov
D.I.Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology,
Russia
1 Introduction
At present, a great number of embedded sensor devices provide monitoring of operating conditions and state of equipment, including nuclear reactors of power plants The metrological reliability of measuring instruments built in equipment determines the validity
of measurement information The quality of production, operating costs, and the probability
of accidents depend on the validity of measurement information coming to control systems The validity is particularly important in such fields as nuclear power engineering, cosmonautics, aviation, etc For some products in definite periods of their operation, even a short-term loss of confidence in measurement accuracy is unacceptable
The key problems of the measurement information validity are related to the sensor metrological reliability, since their components age and their parameters drift with time Sudden failures can also happen All this can result in control errors The sensor devices used to monitor the condition of technological equipment and the parameters of a technological process, are, as a rule, subject to a variety of influencing quantities Possible consequences of these influences are, for example, depositions, magnetization, and so on In some cases, the effect of the influence quantity can be weakened by a careful design of the sensor For example, the rate of fouling of a sensor surface can be reduced by polishing the surface However, it is not always possible to develop a sensor device immune to influencing factors over a long period of operation Sometimes, economic reasons may play
a role as well
At present, the traceability of measurements is provided by periodic calibrations or verifications (hereinafter both of these procedures will be referred to as calibrations) Accordingly, within the period of operation the probability of a metrological failure depends on the length of the calibration interval (CI) The state of a secondary transducer can be verified by supplying electrical signals of reference values to its inputs As demonstrated in (Fridman, 1991), between 40% and 100% of all measuring instrument failures are due to metrological failures Improvements in production quality result in decrease of the number of failures, the share of metrological failures being increased because with the technology improvement the share of sudden failures decreases It is not expedient
to apply fundamental assumptions of the classical reliability theory (e.g., mutual independence of failure rates and stability of a failure rate) to measuring instruments Usage
of methods based on these assumptions leads to crude errors in the CI determination
To decrease the risk of getting unreliable information, usually the CI is no more than 2-3 years However, the cost of a sensor device calibration is typically 35–300 euro, and the
Trang 16Nuclear Power – Control, Reliability and Human Factors
4
number of sensor devices is growing year by year If a CI duration is constant, the proportion of operating costs spent on calibration will rise to an unacceptable level In many cases, it is necessary to disrupt a technological process in order to carry out sensor device calibration Such interference leads to additional costs
The standard (ISO/IEC, 1999) states that it is ‘‘the responsibility of the end-user organization to determine the appropriate calibration interval under the requirements of its own quality system” The guidelines (OIML, 2007) state that ‘‘the initial decision in determining the CI is based on the following factors:
instrument manufacturer’s recommendation;
expected extent and severity of use;
the influence of the environment;
the required uncertainty in measurement;
maximum permissible errors (e.g., by legal metrology authorities);
adjustment of (or change in) the individual instrument;
data about the same or similar devices, etc.”
Furthermore, it is recommended to adjust the initial CI for the process of operation ‘‘in order
to optimize the balance of risks and costs”, due to a number of reasons, for example:
the instruments may be less reliable than expected;
the operating conditions may vary significantly from the manufacturer’s recommended ranges, requiring an adjustment to the CI;
the level of drift determined by instrument recalibration can demonstrate that longer CIs are possible without any increase of risk;
it may be sufficient to carry out a limited calibration of certain instruments instead of a full calibration, etc
However, in some cases, it is impossible to perform calibrations with a short CI, in order to obtain the data necessary for adjusting the CI value for the measuring instrument For many modern complex technical processes, the mean value of continuous running grows At present, for some processes the campaign duration has to be no less than 10 years
Measuring instrument operation conditions can vary considerably over the course of several CIs In industrial equipment, they can appreciably vary when upgrading the technological process, e.g., in case of production modernization Operation conditions for sensor devices in ship nuclear power sets will depend on the intensity of the equipment use For all the reasons given above, the end user does not want or has no possibility of affording the testing of each measuring instrument in order to provide grounds for optimizing the CI Calibrations are expensive, but as the experience shows, the majority of measuring instruments (according to various estimates which vary from 60% to 80% for all instruments submitted for calibrating) does not need it However, approximately 12% of measuring instruments have an error exceeding the permissible limits within the CI
The contradiction is obvious To reduce the costs associated with the interruption of a technological process and the calibration of built-in measuring instruments, it is desirable to calibrate as seldom as possible However, unreliable information received by a control system from measuring instruments, can cause failures and large economic losses To prevent this, it is necessary to check the measuring instrument state as often as possible
It is impossible to settle this contradiction using trivial methods of calibration