91,84143 Montfavet Cedex, France ABSTRACT: This review examines the parameters of enzymatic browning in apple and apple products that is, phenolic compounds, polyphenoloxidases, and othe
Trang 1This article was downloaded by: [North Carolina State University]
On: 17 December 2012, At: 17:29
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/bfsn20
Enzymatic browning reactions in apple and apple products
Jacques J Nicolas a , Florence C Richard‐Forget b
, Pascale M Goupy b , Marie‐JosèpheAmiot b & Serge Y Aubert b
Version of record first published: 29 Sep 2009
To cite this article: Jacques J Nicolas , Florence C Richard‐Forget , Pascale M Goupy , Marie‐Josèphe Amiot & Serge Y.Aubert (1994): Enzymatic browning reactions in apple and apple products, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,34:2, 109-157
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408399409527653
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form toanyone is expressly forbidden
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should
be independently verified with primary sources The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly inconnection with or arising out of the use of this material
Trang 2Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 34(2): 109-157 (1994)
Enzymatic Browning Reactions in Apple and
Apple Products
Jacques J Nicolas
Chaire de Biochimie Industrielle et Agro-Alimentaire, Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers,
292 Rue Saint-Martin, 75141 PARIS Cedex 03, France
Florence C Richard-Forget, Pascale M Goupy, Marie-Josèphe Amiot,
and Serge Y Aubert
Laboratoire de Biochimie des Degradations, Station de Technologie des Produits V6getaux, Institut
National de la Recherche Agronomique, Domaine Saint-Paul, B.P 91,84143 Montfavet Cedex, France
ABSTRACT: This review examines the parameters of enzymatic browning in apple and apple products that is,
phenolic compounds, polyphenoloxidases, and other factors (ascorbic acid and peroxidases), both qualitatively and quantitatively Then the relationships between intensity of browning and the browning parameters are discussed, including a paragraph on the methods used for browning evaluation Finally, the different methods for the control of browning are presented.
KEY WORDS: apple, browning, polyphenols, enzymes, polyphenoloxidases
I INTRODUCTION
Based on size of production, the apple is one
of the main fruit crops in the world In 1980, the
world apple production exceeded 35 million t,
corresponding to fourth place after grapes, citrus,
and banana.356 The four major producers are the
U.S., France, Italy, and China More than half of
the apple crop is sold in the fresh produce market
Depending on the year, 40 to 60% of apple
pro-duction is used by the industry Juice, either as
single-strength sweet juice or as fermented juice
(cider), apple sauce, and slices, are the main
prod-ucts of processed apples According to Salunkhe
et al.,357 one fourth of the fruit and vegetables
harvested is never consumed because of spoilage
during postharvest manipulations or processing
Concerning apples, the postharvest losses are
considerably less, because it has been estimated
at less than 10% for the fresh market by Sparks408
and about 14% in developing countries by
Steppe.410 The main causes of losses are physical
injuries, physiological disorders or diseases
dur-ing storage,96 and improper conditions for
pro-cessing In most, if not all cases, the observedsymptoms correspond to a discoloration of theapple or the apple products Thus, bruising, which
is the most common defect of apples186 seen onthe market, results in a flattened area on the side
of the fruit with the flesh browned beneath.352-356Similarly, bitter pit,161 superficial171 and senes-cent scalds, internal (senescent or low-tempera-ture) breakdown,15-166 watercore,239 and coreflush223 all result in browning of either the skin orthe internal tissue Finally, juice, puree, and appleslices that are badly processed brown intenselyand give the final products a bad appearance which
is rejected by the consumer.74287-317 These generaldiscoloration phenomena are mainly related toenzymatic browning However, browning can alsooriginate from nonenzymatic reactions such asthe Maillard reaction,16-106217 which occurs mainly
in heat-processed apple products.228-244328-462Basically, enzymatic browning can be de-fined as an initial enzymatic oxidation of phenolsinto slightly colored quinones.13-47-101-185-251-350-470These quinones are then subjected to further reac-tions, enzymically catalyzed or not, leading to the
Trang 3formation of pigments The colors of the latter
differ widely in hue and intensity, following the
phenols from which they originate and the
environmental factors of the oxidation
reac-tion _50.113,184,243,298,308-311,325,351,395,463 E n z y m a t i c
browning is mainly associated with polyphenol
oxidases, which are able to act on phenols in
the presence of oxygen.253"256-338-350-489-510 Two
kinds of enzymes are classified under this trivial
name
The first class, catechol oxidases (E.C 1.10.3.1),catalyze two distinct reactions (Figure 1): the
hydroxylation of monophenols in o-diphenols
(reaction 1) and the oxidation of o-diphenols in
o-quinones (reaction 2) These two enzymatic
reactions consume oxygen and are referred to
as monophenolase (or cresolase) activity and
o-diphenolase (or catecholase) activity, tively The former activity is not always present,and when both activities are present, the ratio ofcresolase/catecholase activities varies widely from
respec-1 to respec-10 or even 40.34-443The second class, laccases (E.C.I 10.3.2),oxidizes o-diphenols as well as p-diphenols (Fig-ure 2), forming their corresponding quinones.Besides other differences in properties,256-475 theunique ability to oxidize p-diphenols can be used
to distinguish laccase activity from that of thefirst class
The nomenclature of these enzymes176 is what confusing because besides the two numbersE.C.I.10.3.1 and E.C.I 10.3.2, a third one exists,E.C.I.14.18.1 It is referred to as monophenolmonooxygenase (tyrosinase) and corresponds to
some-OH CRESOLASE 1/2 0,
OH CATECHOLASE ,0H V2 0 2
H 2 0
(2)
FIGURE 1 Reactions catalyzed by polyphenoloxidases (E.C 1.14.18.1 and
E.C 1.10.3.1) (1) Hydroxylation of monophenol to o-diphenol; (2) tion of o-diphenol to o-quinone.
dehydrogena-FIGURE 2 Reactions catalyzed by laccases (E.C 1.10.3.2).
Trang 4the same enzymes as E.C.I.10.3.1, which always
catalyze the hydroxylation of monophenols
The peroxidases (E.C.I 11.1.7) can also be
considered as participating in enzymatic
brown-ing These enzymes, whose primary function is to
oxidize hydrogen donors at the expense of
perox-ides, are highly specific for hydrogen peroxide
On the other hand, they accept a wide range of
hydrogen donors, including polyphenols.36-342-343-443
The primary products of oxidized phenols are
probably quinones similar to those obtained with
polyphenol oxidases Although peroxidases are
distributed widely, especially in plants, they
gen-erally appear to be little involved in enzymatic
browning of fruits and vegetables following a
mechanical stress The explanation could be that
the peroxidase activity is limited by the internal
level of hydrogen peroxide However, their
in-volvement in a slow process such as internal
browning is possible.423424 Nevertheless, the
di-rect involvement of peroxidase in enzymatic
browning of apple and apple products remains
questionable, as does that of laccases The latter
enzymes are mainly present in fungi and in
cer-tain higher plants256 and are almost always absent
in sound fruits and vegetables, with the exception
of peaches146 and apricots.87 Therefore, the bulk
of the discussion below concentrates on the two
main factors of apple enzymatic browning, that
is, phenolic substrates and polyphenoloxidase
(E.C.I.10.3.1) activity, with a small part devoted
to other factors such as peroxidase and ascorbic
acid The different ways to estimate browning,
the correlations among the intensity of browning
and its causal factors, and, finally, the control of
browning are then examined successively
II PARAMETERS OF ENZYMATIC
BROWNING IN APPLE AND APPLE
PRODUCTS
A Phenolic Compounds of Apple and
Apple Products
1 Total and Individual Phenolics in Ripe
Apple Fruit and Apple Juice
A great number of works have been devoted
to the study of phenolics in apple and apple
prod-lics, six classes are present in apple fruit:hydroxycinnamic derivatives, flavonols, antho-cyanins, dihydrochalcones, monomeric flavan-3-ols, and tannins.236 Since the first modernmonograph published by Harborne142-144 in 1964,considerable information has been compiled onthe classes of these phenolics,135-169-238-321-411-454 aswell as on methodologies for their purification,isolation, quantitation, and structure elucida-tion i27.143.162^™^.455
The quantitation of total phenolic compounds
is not accurate because of the extraction method,which often cannot guarantee a total solubiliza-tion of all phenolics, and to the assay method,which is unavoidably a compromise on the reac-tivity or absorption characteristics of the differentclasses of phenols.27-28-81-234-396-398-413
Nevertheless, these measurements still areused for rough comparisons among samples.Indeed, a wide variability is observed in thetotal phenolic contents of ripe fruits and applejuices (Table 1) Obviously, this variation can bepartly attributed to the different methods used bythe authors for the quantitation of phenols How-ever, even when the same method is used, consid-erable variation in results is still evident.69150-448
As in other fruits, the levels of phenolic pounds in apple are highly dependent on manyfactors, such as variety, stage of maturity, andenvironmental factors.236-491 Besides quantitativevariations among the classes of phenolic com-pounds, large variations are also apparent in thequalitative distribution, which are caused by ge-netic and external factors Modern methods, par-ticularly high-performance liquid chromatography,
com-considerable progress in both the tion and quantitation of individual phenolics inapple fruit The main phenolics identified in applefruit and apple products are given in Table 2, andthe contents of the different classes are given inTable 3 for the ripe fruits The tables show that:
separa-1 In the cortex, three phenolics accounted formore than 90% of the total phenolic con-tent for most cultivars: one caffeoyl quinicacid (chlorogenic acid) and two flavan-3-ols ((-)-epicatechin and procyanidin B2)
2 In the peel, the hydroxycinnamic acid
Trang 5TABLE 1 Total Phenolic Compounds in Ripe Apple Fruit and Apple Juice
0.9-2.10.6-1.20.2-1.90.5-0.7
Apple Juice
Total
0.7-2.5 0.6-2.0 0.5-17 0.15-0.21 0.6-0.8 1.0-1.9 0.49-0.84 0.5-11
0.16-0.44
0.15-0.580.24-0.620.14-0.370.21-15.20.37-0.620.02-0.140.3-2.7
1.49
Ref.
69448157516449381288450323193150172
46430240740763647412614
Note: Values are given in grams per kilogram (FW ripe fruit) or in grams per liter
(juice).
a Chlorogenic acid equivalent.
b o-Diphenols (chlorogenic acid equivalent).
c Gatechin equivalent.
d Tannins.
8 Not given.
' Gallic acid equivalent.
a o-Diphenols (catechol equivalent).
h Tannic acid equivalent.
whereas the flavan-3-ol and flavonolderivatives constitute the major part of thephenolic compounds
3 In the hydroxycinnamic derivatives, quinic
acid is the only hydroxyacid that formsesters with caffeic403 and /7-coumaric41-492acids Although not detected in the originalfruit, 5'-feruloyl quinic acid has beenreported in cell suspensions from applefruit.195 In the latter case, it accumulates inthe latter stage of cell culture growth after
the exponential growth phase Similarbehavior was shown for the sinapoylglucose ester, which was observed only in
in vitro cell suspension cultures from apple
parenchyma.195-307 In apple fruit, besidesquinic acid, hydroxycinnamic acids formesters with sugars and, more precisely, withglucose Thus, Macheix231-232 reported that1-0-p-coumaroyl glucose was one of the majorp-coumaric derivatives in apple (var CalviUeblanc) together with several p-coumaroyl
Trang 6TABLE 2
Main Phenolics Identified in Apple Fruit and Apple Products (According to Reference 236, with Modifications)
P h e n o l i c A c i d s 4 ' 9 5 ' 1 0 7 - 1 1 2 - 1 6 5 ' 2 2 9 ' 2 3 2 ' 2 3 5 ' 2 6 6 ' 2 7 9 ' 3 0 6 ' 3 3 6 ' 4 0 3 ' 4 8 7 ' 4 9 0 ' 4 9 2 ' 4 9 7
5'-caffeoylquinic, a 4'-caffeoylquinic, 3'-caffeoylquinic, 5'-p-coumaroylquinic, 4'-p-coumaroylquinic,
3'-p-coumaroylquinic, p-coumaroylglucose, caffeoylglucose, feruloylglucose
Note: The major compounds in each class are written in boldfaced type.
a The IUPAC recommendations 177 were applied for the nomenclature of the hydroxycinnamic quinic esters Thus, 5'-caffeoylquinic is chlorogenic acid, 4'-caffeoylquinic acid is cryptochlorogenic acid, and 3'-caffeoylquinic acid is neochlorogenic acid.
b A structure of quercetin-3-O-a-galactoside was proposed by Teuber and Herrmann 425
0 Present in apple cultivars with red-colored skins.
4.
quinic esters Similarly, in their compilation,
Risch and Herrmann336 indicated that the
glucose esters in apple were mainly
p-coumaroyl and feruloyl glucose esters
Glucoside derivatives in which the phenolic
group is engaged in bonding with glucose
are not present in apple fruit, although they
are often encountered in plants.159 Finally,
according to Macheix et al.,237 the overall
balance of the three hydroxycinnamic acids
(either as quinic esters or as glucose esters)
ranges between 75 and 94% for caffeic acid,
5 and 20% forp-coumaric acid, and 1 to 5%
for ferulic acid
In the flavan-3-ol derivatives, procyanidin
B2 (dimer of two (—)-epicatechin units
linked in a bond between C4, the "upper
unit", and C8, the "lower unit") and(-)-epicatechin are the most abundant.35-306The (+)-catechin isomer is also alwayspresent in apple fruit, although sometimesonly as traces.336 According to Mosel andHerrmann,2 8 3 the mean content of(-)-epicatechin in apples is five timeshigher than that of (+)-catechin The latterauthors indicated that (+)-gallocatechin and(—)-epigallocatechin, which are normallyabsent in apples, have been found in somecultivars283-284 in relation to certain climaticfactors and growing conditions The dataconcerning the polymeric forms of flavan-3-ols ("tannins") are scarce, probably owing
to the difficulties encountered in their totalextraction and precise quantitation Almost
Trang 7TABLE 3 Content in Chlorogenic Acid (CG), Other Hydroxycinnamic Derivatives (HCd), Flavan-3-Ols (F3OI), Flavonols (FVOd), and Dihydrochalcones (DHC) of Ripe Apple Fruit and Apple Juice
6-51 4.3-19 a
18-173 19-55 4.2-32
9-^34-6
18-171 18-171 0.1-20 2-15 3-6 5-150 3-89
0.25-0.91 6.6-23.2
0.73-250.3-5.9
11-510-5.50.35-^.1
15-5012-56
0.96-4.9
4-33
0.2-12 3.5-16 90-261 33-124 3-21.5 13-30 5-29 98-214 98-214 230-650 19.4-81.5 45.5-143 25-127 100-960 50-450 120-575
Apple Juice
0.23-0.45 tr-0.16 3.2-20
0.4-3.3
0.3-46.5 0.1-2.5
FVOd
0-2.9 6-26
4-15 tr-3.8 0.02-O.24
16-52 15.8-142 154-285 78-107 120-550 81-353
0.6-65 8.7-33 18-33 8-220 7-211
Ref.
23669172
158 336 283 5,7 322
305, 306 266 35 4 12 322
305, 306
85, 266 35 4 436
12
1.4-2.7 108
— 33 0.48-3.5 80 0.1-1.6 407
Note: All results are given in milligrams per 100 g FW basis or in milligrams per 100 ml (juice)
except those marked by an asterisk (*), which are given in milligrams per 100 g DM basis.
a expressed as caffeic acid equivalent (contains all the caffeoyl esters).
b expressed as p-coumaric and ferulic acids (contains all the coumaroyl and feruloyl esters).
all the data are concerned with apple juicesand ciders, owing to the interest in thesensory and technological properties ofthese products.76-203-208-209-212-280-282-302-407-451-452
A considerable range existed in the totaltannin content of apple juices.80-207-210 Thus,large differences were found in thephenolics of juices obtained from a dessertapple (var Bramley) and a cider apple (var
Dabinett).208 However, the largest differencewas associated with the tannin fraction asthe Dabinett juice contained twofold more
phenolic acids, fivefold more phloridzin, andtenfold more epicatechin, but 20-fold moreprocyanidin B2 than the Bramley juice.208
5 In the flavonol derivatives, the onlycharacteristic feature is the presence ofquercetin as aglycone Methods have beenproposed for the certification of apple juicesbased on their flavonol contents.92-93Although kaempferol derivatives have beenreported by Van Buren450 and Herrmann,158their presence has never been confirmedsince then Similarly, the presence of a
Trang 8diglucoside quercetin found only by Fisher1 •'
seems unlikely In apple fruit, the
diversity is at the sugar level, because six
different quercetin-3-glycosides have
been characterized fully They are all of
a pyranose form with the exception of
arabinose, which has a furanose form The
amount of each giycoside derivative
(galactose, xylose, glucose, arabinose,
rhamnose, and rutinose) and their relative
balance are highly dependent on variety
(Table 4) According to Teuber and
Herrmann425 and Oleszek et al.,294 hyperin
(the galactoside derivative) is the most
abundant
In the dihydrochalcone derivatives, two
compounds have been characterized in apple
and apple products For a long time, it was
stated that phloridzin
(phloretin-2'-0-glucoside), a characteristic compound of the
genusMalus (Rosaceae),42-468-494 was present
in leaves, stems, and seeds but absent in
fruits.493 However, a first description of
phloridzin was reported in the ethyl acetate
7.
extract of the core tissue of Mclntosh apples95and the methanol extract of peel of Democratapples.111 Then, using HPLC, this compoundwas fully characterized in the different parts
of apple fruit85-305 and in apple juice.497 Inthe same extracts, another phloretin giycosidewas also characterized corresponding to thexyloglucoside294 as well as in GoldenDelicious apple juices and jams.431-432 Thephloridzin content varied from 87 to 331 fig/g
of fresh peel in eight cultivars grown inCanada266 and from 21 to 105 |Xg/g for fivecultivars grown in Spain.306 In the cortex,levels were not as high as in the peel, as theyranged from 0.1 to 0.25 |Llg/g for the lattercultivars306 on a fresh-weight basis and from
10 to 290 (ig/g for 11 French cultivars on adry-weight basis.7
In the anthocyanin derivatives, cyanidin wasthe only aglycone found in apple cultivarswith red-colored skin There is a generalagreement to indicate that ideain (thecyanidin-3-galactoside) is the major pig-ment,412-468 because it represented more than
TABLE 4
Quercetin Giycoside Concentration in Apple Peel (tng.kg- 1 FW Basis) for Three
Cultivars Grown in U.S., Eight Cultivars Grown in Canada, 266 Five Cultivars Grown in Spain, 306 and One in Germany 425
71
80 128 361 369 440 661 69.7 57.9 124 131 347 73
Rutinoside
—
—
117 57 159 185 117 110 139 169 0.5 1.1
3.3
15 19.2
3
Xyloside
100 110 150 210 244 192 119 254 195 145 297
Galactoside + glucoside
360 330
500
604 783 735 554 696 869 594 924 91 78 428 613 954
220 a
Arabinosfde
130 140 200 546 662 589 556 777 539 508 801 21.1 21.3 29.1 47.7 105 75
Ref
35 35 35 266 266 266 266 266 266 266 266 306 306 306 306 306 425
Trang 988% of the anthocyanins in 11 cultivarsgrown in England427 and approximately 40%
in the cultivar Scugog grown in Canada.260The presence of a cyanidin-7-arabinosidewas postulated by Sun and Francis.412 How-ever, later on, Timberlake and Bridle427 raisedsome doubt as to the presence of derivativeswith sugars linked in the 7 position ofcyanidin They indicated that all the deriva-tives are esterified by sugars in the 3 posi-tion Moreover, the same authors427 havefound minor pigments corresponding toacylated forms of cyanidin-3-monoglyco-sides, but the nature of the acids involved inacylation was not determined
As already stated, several factors can inducelarge variations in both the quantitative and quali-
tative content of phenolic compounds in apple
2 Phenolic Variations at the Subcellular
Level
At the subcellular level, the phenolics arelocated mainly in the vacuoles Yamaki505 indi-
cated that 97% of the total phenolics present in
apple cells accumulate in vacuoles, while 3% are
in free space and none in cytoplasm According to
the same author,505 the calculated concentration
of phenols is higher than 0.1 M in vacuoles of
immature fruit flesh compared with the 1 to 10 mAf
usually found in mature apples.450
3 Phenolic Variations at the Tissue
Level
Although the subcellular distribution ofsoluble phenolics appears to be homogenous, the
situation is different at the tissue level Thus, it
can be seen in Tables 1 and 3 that the epidermal
and subepidermal layers (peel) have a higher
con-tent of phenolics than the internal tissue (cortex)
In different cultivars, the peel/cortex phenolic
content ratio ranged from 3 to lO.4.35.167-266.305.306-322
In a more precise study on the Calville Blanc
variety, Macheix232-234 divided apple fruit into four
zones, from the outer to the inner parts of the
fruit, corresponding to (1) the peel, (2) the outerpart of the cortex (the major edible portion ofapple), (3) the circular zone surrounding the car-pels, and (4) the central core, respectively Zone
1 was the richest in chlorogenic acid, catechins,and flavonols The flavonol content was less than
40 mg/kg (FW basis) in zones 2 to 4 comparedwith the 178 mg/kg in zone 1 The chlorogenicacid content was the lowest in zone 2 and in-creased slightly in zones 3 and 4 Although lessimportant than in the peel, the catechin contentwas higher in zone 3 than in zones 2 and 4.Concerning chlorogenic acid content in the peel,this last result was slightly contradictory to thegeneral comments given in Section 2.1.1 forTables 2 and 3 This probably comes from differ-ences in the repartitions between peel and cortexused by the authors Risch and Herrmann336 alsoreported a greater amount of chlorogenic acid inthe core than in the outer part of the cortex for theJonathan cultivar Similarly, Harel et al.150 found
a nonuniform concentration of o-diphenols in theflesh of the Grand Alexander cultivar They re-ported that the amount of phenolics was highest
in the peel, lowest in the outer part of cortex, andgradually increased toward the core This unevenspatial distribution of phenolic compounds in applefruit flesh is important, as it can induce differenttissue sensitivities to enzymatic browning
4 Phenolic Variations at the Cultivar Level
A considerable variation was observed in thecontent of both total and individual phenolicsamong different cultivars of apple Thus, in theircompilations, Van Buren450 and Herrmann157 in-dicated ranges of 1 to 11 and 1 to 34, respectively,
in the total phenolics content among varieties.Similarly, concerning the main individualphenolics, a variation of 1 to 10 was given forchlorogenic acid by Macheix et al.236 and for(—)-epicatechin by Risch and Herrmann.336 Simi-lar variations (1 to 9) were also found for fla-vonols in apple peel.305 Apple cultivars with green-and yellow-colored skin are pigmented by chloro-phylls, carotenoids,23 and quercetin derivatives503and are obviously devoid of anthocyanins Never-
Trang 10theless, a large variation (1 to 3) was also
ob-served for ten Delicious apple strains with
red-colored skin grown in the U.S.394 Interestingly
enough, the latter authors394 found a correlation
between the peel luminance L*, measured by a
portable tristimulus colorimeter, and the
antho-cyanin level of deep-red-colored fruits
5 Influence of Maturity and
Postharvest Storage
Although, as already mentioned, the assay
methods for total phenol content are not
accu-rate, there is general agreement that the
con-centrations of phenolic compounds are very high
in young fruits and then rapidly decrease during
fruit development.236 Numerous studies carried
out on the phenolic content of developing apples
reflect this general trend.69-150-157-229-466-488-516 The
phenolic concentrations decline sharply 1 month
after the petal drop, reaching a low level
10 weeks later, and remain approximately
constant thereafter.150-488 On a fruit basis, the
change in total phenols is less pronounced
dur-ing the 4- to 14-week period after the petal
drop Because in that period the number of cells
is fixed, the decrease in the concentration of
total phenols is primarily the result of a dilution
of phenolic compounds in the vacuole.236 After
harvest, the concentration of total phenols
r e m a i n s e s s e n t i a l l y constant or d e c r e a s e s
slightly.35-69-150-172-229-445-448
The changes in content of the different classes
of phenols and of some individual phenols have
also been followed during apple fruit
develop-ment and its subsequent storage after harvest
Thus, during apple development and 1 month
after the petal drop, a general decrease in the
hydroxycinnamic (caffeic, p-coumaric, and
feru-lic) acid derivatives was observed.284 An example
is shown in Figure 3A concerning changes in the
levels of /j-coumaroylquinic acid,
p-coumaroyl-glucose, and chlorogenic acid (by far the most
important).233 For the latter phenolic compound,
similar results were given by several
au-thors.35-69-230-466 During cold storage, the variations
in the content of hydroxycinnamic acid
deriva-tives were less important and, depending on the
cultivars, the authors indicated a decrease,283-284 aconstant level,69 or fluctuations.172-445 On a fruitbasis (Figure 3B), after the initial and rapid rise
in chlorogenic acid (the same was observed for
p c o u m a r o y l q u i n i c acid and p c o u m a r o y l glucose), this phenol steadily accumulated, and itwas only after 10 weeks that its amount decreasedslightly.233 Depending on the cultivars, this lastdecline was not observed283-284 or only during coldstorage.69-172 The variations in catechins were simi-lar to those obtained with hydroxycinnamic de-rivatives The concentrations in catechins rosesharply during the 30 to 40 d after flowering andthen decreased rapidly to stabilize at a low level
-in mature fruit230-283-284 and throughout the storageperiod.35 On a fruit basis, a later peak was ob-served and the decrease was delayed to the end ofthe maturation period.283 Moreover, in two applevarieties, an increase in the (-)-epicatechin-to-(+)-catechin ratio was observed during the pro-gressive growth of the fruit.284 Only a few workshave been devoted to the variations of quercetinand phloretin glycosides The quercetin glyco-sides per gram of fresh weight remained fairlyconstant during the 2 months preceding the com-mercial harvest (var Golden Delicious and GrimesGolden) but, because of fruit growth, increased
on a per fruit basis.503 Moreover, inside the mercial harvest, the same author503 indicated thatthe flavonol content of green fruit was only half
com-of that com-of yellow fruit (var Golden Delicious) Inthat case, no change was observed in the totalflavonol content during storage However, forMclntosh apples, a two- to threefold increase inthe levels of quercetin glycosides was found duringthe first 2 months of cold storage.85 A similartrend was found for phloridzin.85 Finally, althoughthe total quercetin glycosides remained relativelyconstant until the climacteric, considerable varia-tions were observed a m o n g the individualglycosides.85
6 Influence of External and Internal Factors during Cultivation and Storage
As in other fruits, the regulation of phenolicmetabolism in apple depends greatly on both ex-ternal and internal factors (light, temperature,ethylene, growth regulators, nutrients, pesticides,
Trang 11120-a
b
•300 c
FIGURE 3 Changes in the levels of (a) p-coumaroylquinic acid, (b) p-coumaroylglucose, (c) chlorogenic acid, and (d) fresh weight (in grams) during apple growth (A) milligram per 100 g FW; (B) milligram per fruit (From Macheix, J J.,
Physiol Veg., 12, 25, 1974 With permission.)
etc.), as demonstrated by numerous studies
Prob-ably because of its impact on the visual quality of
the fruit, most studies dealt with anthocyanin
bio-synthesis in red-colored apple skins
Although the accumulation level of cyanin is genetically controlled, the requirement
antho-of light for red pigment biosynthesis in apple
skin has been emphasized by many
work-e r s 9.44.154.197.326.393 7 ^ e f f e c t o f temperature on
anthocyanin biosynthesis, which has been ognized for a long time,70 depends largely on thefruit maturity stage.10-103 Thus, for the Jonathancultivar, the optimum temperature increased from12°C in unripe fruit to 16 to 24°C in ripe fruit.103
Trang 12For these factors, anthocyanin accumulation
ap-peared to be correlated with phenylalanine
am-monia lyase (PAL) activity.415416 Application of
ethylene104 or ethylene-releasing compounds414 to
unripe apples resulted in anthocyanin
accumula-tion to levels similar to those in ripe apples The
same held for the PAL activity when unripe apples
were ethylene treated.104 However, with ripe fruits,
the ethylene treatment had no effect on both
fac-tors, suggesting that during apple ripening,
antho-cyanin accumulation is under the control of the
PAL activity.105 In addition, treatment with
syn-thetic auxins such as a-napthalene acetic acid and
2-[2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy] propionic acid in
combination with Ethephon® (an
ethylene-releas-ing compound) and Alar® (a growth retardant)
enhanced the red color of the skin of some U.S
cultivars.30-97-136 Besides anthocyanin, cultural
prac-tices can also affect other phenolics Thus, a
sig-nificantly lower amount of phenols was found in
apples treated with Melprex 65® (a pesticide
prepa-ration containing dodine).141 Similarly, ciders
obtained from "fed" (NPK fertilizer) Dabinett
apple trees were less bitter and astringent than
those from "unfed" trees, which was related to an
overall decrease of 17% in fruit phenolic
concen-tration.210
During cold storage, carbon dioxide levels
greater than 73% in an in-package, modified
at-mosphere severely destabilized anthocyanins of
the skin of Starkrimson apples after 23 weeks at
2°C and 76% humidity.222
B Polyphenol Oxidase in Apple and
Apple Products
1 Assay of Activity
The correct assay of polyphenol oxidase
ac-tivity is obviously a need, and, in this respect, two
problems have to be overcome The first lies in
the choice of assay method and the second is to
properly differentiate between catecholase and
laccase on the one hand and peroxidase on the
other hand
As already stated, the primary products of the
oxidation of phenols are highly unstable and
un-dergo many secondary reactions with both phenols
and proteins.5230*"310 Therefore, it is difficult inroutine assays to measure precisely either productformation or phenol consumption due to the en-zymatic catalysis Undoubtedly, the use of spec-trophotometry to follow quinone formation is theeasiest method.254-271 However, it is in some ways
an inaccurate method owing to side reactions sulting in nonlinear color formation with time)and enzyme inactivation through a suicide mecha-nism.463 Moreover, the extinction coefficients ofthe enzymically produced quinones are not al-ways accurately known.463 To circumvent theseproblems, some authors have proposed coupledassays in which quinone accumulation is avoided.This is carried out either with ascorbic acid, as inthe "chronometric method",78'313 or with com-pounds forming stable adducts with differentspectral properties such as proline,354 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid,1 0 2 and B e s t h o r n ' s hydra-zone.259-312 Nevertheless, according to Mayer
(re-et al.,257 the polarographic measurement of gen uptake148-249 is the most convenient and accu-rate method for determining polyphenol oxidaseactivity However, although this method hasreplaced the manometric method,467 it sufferssome drawbacks The ratio of oxygen consumed
oxy-to phenol oxidized changes with the reactiontime and depends on the phenolic structureand concentration, p H , and buffer solutionused.53-58-120-243-257-308-333-335-341 The reaction velocity
is dependent on oxygen concentration.504 Becausethe Km O2 of polyphenol oxidase is in the 0.1- to0.5-mM range,180-254 the enzymes are not saturated
by oxygen during the assay and the true values ofVmax are seldom determined Thus, when usingthe polarographic method, it is essential to care-fully control the assay conditions (temperature,
pH, type of buffer, and air saturation) and tomeasure only the initial rate of oxygen uptake.The unique ability to oxidize p-diphenols(andp-diphenylene diamine) is often used as atest for the presence of laccase activity How-ever, it is not sufficient, at least in crude ex-tracts In the latter, the occurrence of endogenouso-diphenols could provoke coupled oxidation ofadded p-diphenols by o-diphenolase, leading tothe false conclusion that laccase is present.Therefore, additional tests with specific inhibi-tors of each activity are required Thus, phenyl-
Trang 13hydrazine,219 salicylhydroxamic acid,3 lenediol,258 and cinnamic acids475 are specificinhibitors of o-diphenolase, whereas cetyl-trimethylammonium and other quaternaryammonium compounds469-475 inhibit p-dipheno-lase.
2,3-naptha-In crude extracts, it is also preferable to checkthe possible interference of peroxidase activity
This is easily performed by adding catalase andethanol in order to remove residual peroxidesfrom the reaction medium258 or by usingtropolone.188 The latter compound is a very effec-tive inhibitor of polyphenol oxidase189 and canserve as a substrate for peroxidase in the presence
of hydrogen peroxide.190
2 Localization
There is general agreement that polyphenoloxidase is predominantly a plastid enzyme inhigher plants.155-253-254-430-456 In nonsenescent tis-sues, it is mainly located on the thylakoid mem-brane of chloroplasts and in vesicles or otherbodies in nongreen plastid types.457 However, someauthors reported that polyphenol oxidase can alsoexist in mitochondrial fractions or is readilysoluble (nonmembrane associated) in plantcells.38-40-148-256-401 In apple fruit, polyphenol oxi-dase has been located both in organelles (chloro-plast and mitochondria), where it may be tightlybound to the membrane, and in the soluble fraction
of the cell.83-148 As in many other fruits,25-146-192-373the proportion of readily soluble polyphenol oxi-dase activity increases during the ripening of applefruit.17-148-178 It has been proposed that polyphenoloxidase was solubilized from the plastid and re-leased to the cytoplasm, where the enzyme re-mained either soluble or associated with the cell
wall.17 A similar evolution was found with appletissue culture.460-461
3 Extraction
T w o p r o b l e m s are encountered for theoptimization of the extraction conditions of
polyphenol oxidase, full solubilization of the
membrane-bound activity and protection against
phenolic oxidation during and after extraction
As already stated, the strength of polyphenol dase binding to membranes is variable There-fore, in most cases, full extraction of the activityrequires the use of a detergent such as Triton®X100,122-439-501 Triton® XI14,360-361 or SDS.8-25 Forapple fruit, solubilization was achieved by use of
oxi-a detergent, either Triton® X10083-148-149-181-409-474
or digitonin,145 or after preparation of an acetonepowder.132-133-289-349-376-387-405-434-509 Although the lat-ter method avoids the use of a detergent, whichmay cause some problems during further purifi-cation, it also undoubtedly results in modification
of the enzyme properties, the extent of which hasnot always been taken into account
The second problem arises from the neous presence of quinones in crude extracts ofthe enzyme and its endogenous phenolic sub-strates It is therefore essential to avoid, or at leastminimize, the formation of quinones that thenreact with proteins Such reactions may result inactivity losses and the formation of "new" artifac-tual enzymatic forms399 through covalent, hydro-gen, hydrophobic, and ionic bindings betweenproteins and phenolics or quinones.224-225-264 Meth-ods to prevent the reaction of polyphenol oxidasewith phenolics include the use of phenol-bindingagents such as polyethylene-glycol,24 soluble andinsoluble polyvinyl(poly)pyrrolidone (PVP andPVPP),2 2 6 and hydrophobic2 2 7 and anion ex-change399 resins However, as all plant materialshave different types and various amounts of phe-nolics, there is no universal method to effectivelyremove phenols Therefore, it is often advisable
simulta-to add simulta-to the extracting medium compounds thatprevent the formation of quinones or trap thequinones as soon as they are formed In this re-spect, the most frequently used compounds aresodium diethyldithiocarbamate308 (a powerfulchelator of copper) and reducing agents such asascorbic acid,337 mercaptoethanol,435 and cys-teine.19-241-242 Finally, protease inhibitors wereadded to prevent the formation of artifactualmultiple forms of polyphenol oxidase by endog-enous proteolytic enzymes.117-501 In crude enzy-matic extracts of apple, PEG,60-474 PVP,59-132-133-474cysteine45-467-473 (either alone or with mercapto-benzothiazole409), and ascorbic acid have beenused.67-83-150-181-258
Trang 144 Purification
Although numerous works have been devoted
to the purification of this enzyme, only a few
polyphenol oxidases have been purified to
appar-ent homogeneity, probably owing to the
difficul-ties encountered in the preparation of active and
stable crude extracts After an initial step, which
most frequently was ammonium sulfate fractional
precipitation, further purification involved the use
of one or several chromatographic steps Apart
from routine chromatographic methods of
separa-tion (adsorpsepara-tion, gel filtrasepara-tion, and ionic
exchange),32>121-292'337 hydrophobic
chroma-tography,I18-182-500 isoelectric focusing,174
con-canavalin-agarose chromatography,485 and
immobilized metal chelate chromatography511-513
have been applied successfully to the purification
of polyphenol oxidase from several origins
Surprisingly, although mushroom polyphenol
oxi-dase was probably the first enzyme to which the
affinity concept for chromatography was
ap-plied,218 there were only a few applications of this
method for other polyphenol oxidases.168-506
Apple polyphenol oxidase was only partially
purified from peel using DEAE cellulose
chroma-tography83149'474 and calcium phosphate
adsorp-tion chromatography,409 from cortex using
hydrophobic chromatography,6-178-181-331-405-434 or
from the whole fruit using gel filtration.45132 After
electrophoresis, the number of isoforms varied
from one132 to two376-474 or three,67-149-181 which
Harel and Mayer145 indicated could be because of
various degrees of subunit aggregation of the same
enzyme Based on the Triton extracts, the
pub-lished purification factors were 260,149 230,409 and
150,181 with a yield ranging from 55 to 35% After
hydrophobic chromatography, Richard-Forget331
further purified polyphenol oxidase from Red
Delicious cortex by immobilized metal chelate
chromatography followed by affinity
chromatog-raphy The former method gave one major peak
containing 75% of the activity with a threefold
purification Affinity chromatography using
p-coumaric acid as ligand on agarose (the gel was
synthesized by coupling p-coumaric acid to
hexamethylenediamine agarose178 via an azo
link-age66'72-73) resulted in one purified fraction
repre-senting 25% of the crude extract activity and a
240-fold purification Nevertheless, silver nitratestaining after SDS electrophoresis revealed onemajor band (90% of the coloration) still accompa-nied by three faint, minor bands (10% of thecoloration) Finally, two major (60 and 35%) andone minor (5%) fraction can be separated by ionexchange chromatography at pH 6.5 using DEAEsepharose CL6B.331 This confirmed a previousexperiment of isoelectric focusing that gave twomajor peaks with a pHi at pH 4.5 and pH 4.8 and
a minor one with a pHi close to pH 6.7.181 Mostpolyphenol oxidases from plants are 40- to
45-kDa proteins, as was first suggested by in vitro
translation experiments.114"116-201 However, 60- to68-kDa forms, containing a transit peptide, thattarget the protein to the chloroplast have alsobeen purified from broad bean,123-344 and recently
a gene coding for a 66.3-kDa polyphenol oxidasewas isolated from tomato.386 Gel filtration resolvedapple enzyme activity into a single peak132-181 with
a molecular weight of 26132 or 46 kDa,181 or intothree peaks83-145 corresponding to molecularweights of 24 to 40,60 to 70, and 120 to 134 kDa,respectively Finally, in apple buds, three isoen-zymes were observed by electrophoresis withmolecular weights of 32, 39, and 77 kDa.478
5 Polyphenol Oxidase Activity
Variations in Apple
The level of polyphenol oxidase activity atharvest and its variation during fruit storage areobviously of great importance from a technologi-cal point of view There is general agreement thatenzyme activity is much higher in young fruitsthan in ripe fruits (at commercial harvest) on a pergram of fresh weight as well as on a fruit ba-sis 148,230.255,488 However, there were some discrep-ancies concerning its evolution in the latter stages
of development and during fresh storage Thus, ifthe amount of freely soluble activity always in-creased in this period17-83-148-178 the total polyphe-nol oxidase activity either decreased17-83-148-181-230
or fluctuated,89'181-445-448 depending on the cultivar.Only in one case516 was total enzyme activityfound to increase during this period During rip-ening of the Royal Delicious variety, activity in-creased in the peel but decreased in the cortex.324
Trang 15The application of methyl jasmonate, an inhibitor
of ethylene production in postclimacteric apples,strongly stimulated the polyphenol oxidase activ-ity.75 However, this treatment did not induce theformation of new isoenzymes
The level of polyphenol oxidase activity isalso tissue dependent Some authors reportedthat enzyme activity was higher in the peel than
in the cortex,148-409 whereas the reverse was found
by others.193-322-323 With the Grand Alexandervariety, the activity decreased from the core tothe outer part of the cortex and then increased inthe peel.148 Finally, of 12 varieties analyzed atcommercial harvest,181 the levels in the cortexcompared with that in the peel were higher forseven varieties, equivalent for four varieties, andlower for one variety Table 5 shows that polyphe-nol oxidase activity is also cultivar dependent,because the relative levels ranged from 1 to 10 inboth the cortex and the peel.181-193 Similar resultswere found for different cultivars by other work-
e r s 7.12,28.69,150,323,448^16 Compared with other tivars, Red Delicious always had the highestpolyphenol oxidase activity.69-181-193
cul-6 Kinetic Properties
Enzyme specificity for phenolic compounds
has been the subject of several reports, whereasonly a few studies were devoted to the effect ofthe second substrate (i.e., oxygen).253-254-443-489-510Polyphenol oxidases isolated from higher plantsand fungi are able to oxidize a wide range ofmonophenols and o-diphenols However, whereasthe Km values for oxygen only vary between 0.1and 0.5 mM, the kinetic parameters, Vm and Km,
of the different phenolics are highly variable.Moreover, most of the latter constants are onlyapparent, as they were not determined at a saturat-ing concentration in oxygen but most often in air-saturated solutions of the phenolic substrates.Several enzymatic extracts of plantorigin are devoid of monophenolase activ-
1^24,131,151,174,200,300,337,347,486,502,515 w h e n p r e s e n t ,
cresolase activity was often partially or totallylost on purification.19-202-290-388 Moreover, in thesame species, multiple forms may also vary inthe monophenolase-to-o-diphenolase ratio ofactivities.247-301-511
a Phenolic Substrate
Numerous studies have been carried out onthe specificity of apple polyphenoloxidase forphenolic substrates Large differences have beenfound in the apparent Km values for phenolics inair-saturated solutions (Table 6)
TABLE 5 Relative Polyphenoloxidase Activity for Different Apple Cultivars at Commercial Maturity Variety 8
Delicious Jonathan Golden Delicious San Jacinto Peasgood Orleans Reinette Rome Beauty Ben Davis Alex Kyriati
G Alexander Gallia-Beauty
Cortex
100 100 92 85 82 56 52 50 42 37 30 24
Variety"
Red Delicious Mclntosh Fuji Gala Fiorina Golden Delicious Canada
G Smith Mutsu Jonagold Charden Elstar
Peel
100
46 57 30 42 33 48 43 71 43 31 10
Cortex
100
80 71 48 40 30 88 73 54 43 39 20
Variety 6
Richared Delicious Braeburn
Sturmer Pippin Splendor Dougherty Golden Delicious
G Smith Kempton
Peel
100
62 47 71 14 26 65 34
Cortex
100
38 31 30 30 28 10 9
Adapted from Harel et al.; 148 manometric measurement at pH 5.1.
Adapted from Janovitz-Klapp et al.; 181 polarographic measurement at pH 4.5.
Adapted from Klein; 193 spectrophotometric measurement at pH 6.2.
Trang 16TABLE 6
Km Values of Apple Polyphenoloxidase Toward Different Phenolic Compounds in Air-Saturated Solutions (All Values in Millimoles)
Catechol 4-Methylcatechol Protocatechuic acid o-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid Dihydrocaffeic acid
Caffeic acid Chlorogenic acid Rosmarinic acid o-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (-)-Epicatechin
(+)-Catechin Procyanidin B2 Procyanidin C1 Quercetin Butein 3-Hydroxyphloridzin
p-Cresol Phloretin Phloridzin
A s s a y method Quinone formation
(spectrophotometry)
o D i p h e n o l s
140, 59 22, 5 0 9 18, 231 S.3 4443 2.1 , 444a 4.7 331
1.6 331
19 331 2331 0.15 331 3.9, 331 1.6" 4 * 26,331 g444b 5.9 3 3 1
5 8 3 3 1 1 2 444a
0.3 331 0.3 331
Monophenols
0.5 33 ' 0.5 33 '
Note: The pH conditions of the assay were the following:
Ref 59 133 509 132
pH 5.5 6 5 4.5
148 467 180 331 5.1 5 4.5 4.5
Oxygen uptake (polarography-manometry)
Some discrepancies among the results
ob-tained by different authors are apparent These
variations could have different origins First, they
could originate from differences in the assay
methods, although Richard-Forget331 obtained
similar apparent Km values for 14 phenols when
she compared the results given by the
spectropho-tometric and polarographic methods Second,
various apple cultivars have been used as the
enzyme source, and small differences have been
found in the apparent values for the
poly-phenoloxidases extracted from Jonathan and
Starking cultivars.444 Third, in the same cultivar,
differences were observed between the crude
ex-tract from chloroplasts and that from
mitochon-dria.148 Moreover, the same authors149 showed thatthe apparent Km values were affected by purifica-tion, since for 4-methylcatechol, the Km of thecrude extract from chloroplasts was 6 mM, whereas
it was 15.4 and 4.9 mM for two fractions isolated
by ionic exchange chromatography on DEAEcellulose However, other authors178-474 using simi-lar methods did not find any variation in the speci-ficity of apple polyphenoloxidase during itspurification Finally, pH undoubtedly affected theapparent Km values.148-444 It was shown181 that theapparent Km values for 4-methylcatechol, chlo-rogenic acid, and (+)-catechin remained almostconstant between pH 3.5 and 5, but increased asthe pH increased above pH 5 When oxygen uptake
Trang 17was compared for different phenolic substrates,
4-methylcatechol was always found to be the most
rapidly oxidized at saturating
concentra-tions 132.148.149,180,181,331,409,474
However, in terms of efficiency, Vm/Km (thisratio is proportional to the enzyme activity at
substrate concentrations far below Km; the
con-cept is reexamined in Section II.B.7), many
phe-nolic compounds appeared to be better substrates
than 4-methylcatechol (Table 7) This is the case
for compounds with the structure of, or close to
that of, caffeoyl derivatives such as butein and
caffeic, hydrocaffeic, rosmarinic, and chlorogenic
acids The apparent Km of the main phenolics of
the apple fruit cortex, that is, chlorogenic acid, the
two catechin isomers, and the procyanidins B2
and C l , were in the 2 to 6 mM range (Table 6)
These values indicated that the apple enzyme
TABLE 7
Kinetic Parameters of Purified Apple
Polyphenoloxidase Toward Different Phenolic
Compounds in Air-Saturated Solutions at 30°C
Vm
100 80 99 5.8 125 20 67 94 18 52 60 0.8 4.1 6.1 0.7
Vm/Km
20.4 3.9 24.8 38.7 30.5 62.5 35.3 4.7 0.71 9.1 10.2 0.53 15.2 13 1.4 Note: Km values are in millimoles and Vm in percent
of 4-methylcatechol.
Adapted from Richard-Forget, F M., Recherches sur le
brunissement enzymatique Etudes sur I'oxydation de
phenols et sur I'inhibition de la polyphenoloxydase isolee
de la Pomme (Malus sylvestris, var Red Delicious),
Ph.D thesis, University of Paris, 1992, 7 With
permis-sion.
affinity for these natural substrates was not veryhigh, as was usually found for other poly-phenoloxidases from other origins.254-510 More-over, if chlorogenic acid and the two catechinswere rapidly oxidized by apple polyphenoloxidase,the procyanidins B2 and C l were very slowlydegraded Thus, their maximum rates of oxygenuptake represented only 20 and 7%, respectively,
of that obtained with the monomeric flavan-3-ol(i.e., (-)-epicatechin).1 3 3 T h e monophenolaseactivity was either absent59-467 or, when present,much lower compared with the o-diphenolaseactivity obtained with the best phenolic substrate.The monophenolic substrates were p-cresol,148p-chlorophenol,148p-coumaric acid,132 phloretin,431331and phloridzin.43'331 When tested, tyrosine wasnever found to be a substrate of the apple en-zyme.43-59-132-148-289-467 Concerning the apple fla-vonols, the glycosylated derivatives of quercetinwere not substrates,331-387'467 although the enzymewas able to slowly oxidize the aglycone.331-409However, this oxygen uptake did not result in theformation of colored compounds.331-387 Finally,neither cyanidin nor its galactosyl derivative(ideain) was a substrate of apple polyphenol-oxidase.331 Similar results were obtained for theoxidizability of the procyanidins B2 and C l , thephloretin and quercetin derivatives, and antho-cyanins by other polyphenoloxidases of differentorigins.18-295-298-304-314-327
b Oxygen
Only two reports dealt with the effect of gen on apple polyphenol oxidase activity Using4-methylcatechol (7.5 mM) as substrate, Harel et
oxy-al.148 indicated an apparent Km of 25.8% O2 for acrude enzymatic extract from apple chloroplasts
In a more complete study using three phenols(chlorogenic acid, 4-methylcatechol, and (+)-cat-echin) at different concentrations, Janovitz-Klapp
et al.180 found an equilibrium constant of 0.29 mM(independent of the phenolic substrate) betweenoxygen and a purified preparation of the applepolyphenol oxidase, at pH 4.5 and 30°C Thisvalue, close to the oxygen concentration of air-saturated aqueous solutions at this temperature,499confirms that during the routine activity assay,polyphenol oxidase is only approximately half-
Trang 18saturated by oxygen (as already stated in Section
I.B.I) In the same study,180 the Lineweaver-Burk
representations of the concentration effect of
oxy-gen and phenolic compounds gave a series of
intersecting lines This was characteristic of an
ordered mechanism where one of the substrates is
required to bind to the enzyme before the second
substrate can bind.384 The inhibition mode of
benzoic acid, which was competitive with
4-methylcatechol and uncompetitive with
oxy-gen, permitted the conclusion that oxygen is the
first substrate to be bound by the apple enzyme.180
This is in agreement with results obtained with
polyphenol oxidases extracted from other
sources173-248337 and with the reaction mechanism
proposed for fungal tyrosinases,216-498 if the deoxy
form of the enzyme is arbitrarily chosen as the
first step of the catalysis cycle.510 In contrast,
some reports indicated a ping-pong mechanism, a
random mechanism, or an ordered one where
oxygen does not bind first.90-137'140-220 There are
several explanations for such discrepancies First,
in numerous enzymatic extracts such as those
from fungi,90-140 grape,220 and potato,248 the
monophenolase activity was not negligible In
this case, the mechanism is further complicated,
because o-diphenol has to be considered both a
product of and a substrate for the enzyme
Sec-ond, some authors90 have used a
spectrophoto-metric method to obtain kinetic data, and the part
played by secondary products in the absorption,
which is very difficult to determine, was not taken
into account Third, progress curves of changes in
oxygen concentration obtained in polarographic
assays have also been used to determine the
in-stantaneous velocity at different oxygen
concen-trations.173-220-248 This can lead to erroneous results,
because the initial velocity was not measured for
each oxygen concentration It is well known that
secondary products can play an important role in
oxygen consumption by a nonenzymatic process333
and that polyphenol oxidase undergoes
inactiva-tion during its catalysis.129130
c Kinetics with Two Phenolics—Coupled
Oxidations
Most of the kinetic studies on polyphenol
oxidase were carried out with a reaction medium
containing one phenol However, in natural ucts such as fruits and vegetables, several pheno-lics are present and can be used as a substrate bythe enzyme Few studies have been devoted to theenzymatic oxidation of phenolic mixtures in modelsolutions, and they were mainly concerned withgrape polyphenol oxidase.51-53"55-58-296-334
prod-With apple polyphenol oxidase, Klapp et al.180 conducted kinetic studies on modelsystems containing two phenolic compounds Theydeveloped an equation
up-S2) and kinetic parameters (Km^ Vrnj and Km2»
Vm2) of each individual phenolic substrate present.Equation 1 can be extended to a more complexsolution containing more than two phenolics with-out any special difficulty, provided the concentra-tions and kinetic parameters of the additionalcompounds are known However, when the enzy-matic reaction was followed by spectrophotom-etry, the kinetics obtained did not agree with thisequation There are different explanations for thisfact (1) The absorption coefficients of the differ-ent quinones are only partially known351-463 and,
a fortiori, their respective contribution to the final
absorption (2) The quinones are highly unstableand very rapidly undergo nonenzymatic reac-tions.251-333 (3) Some enzymically produced quino-nes are likely to react nonenzymically withphenols.53-269-395 These coupled oxidations can bevery rapid and are dependent on the respectiveredox potential of the different quinone/phenolcouples present53-281 The existence of such coupledoxidations was demonstrated in caftaric (caffeoyltartaric) acid/flavan-3-ol mixtures with grapepolyphenol oxidase,51-54 and chlorogenic acid/cat-echin mixtures with mushroom296 and apple331polyphenol oxidases In all cases, compared withthe oxidation rate of the phenol alone, the flavan-3-ol degradation was faster, while that of thecaffeoyl derivative was slower The mechanismproposed53 involved enzymatic oxidation of thetwo phenols, followed by chemical oxidation of
Trang 19the flavan-3-ol by the caffeoyl quinone with generation of the caffeoyl derivative Moreover,the o-quinones formed by enzymatic or coupledoxidation can also react with another phenolicmolecule to yield condensation products53-395 in
re-the form of oligomers or copolymers A number
of these secondary products (which can also beobtained by autooxidation) recently have beencharacterized mainly by HPLC using a diode arraydetector.52-61-62-296-331 Besides flavan-3-ols, o-quin-ones of caffeoyl derivatives were able to cooxidizeseveral other phenols such as thiol adducts,56-332anthocyanins,314-327'331 4-methylcatechol,333 fla-
vonols,331 and dihydrochalcones.298-331 According
to Cheynier et al.,53 the redox potential order of
the grape phenolics appeared to be the following:
caftaric acid > epicatechin, catechin > glutathionyl
adduct of caftaric acid > procyanidins >
epicatechin gallate After oxidation studies on
several pairs of phenolics, Richard-Forget331
proposed a similar order: chlorogenic acid >
4-methylcatechol > epicatechin, catechin > cysteinyl
adducts of the four preceding phenols,
anthocya-nins, flavonols, and dihydrochalcones derivatives
Thus, in the two cases, o-quinones of the caffeoyl
derivatives (caftaric and chlorogenic acids) were
the most efficient carrier for coupled oxidation
and seemed to play a determinant role in the
degradation of the other phenolics, including those
that are not a substrate of polyphenol oxidase
d pH and Temperature Effects
Although a pH optimum around 7 was foundfor the polyphenol oxidase activity extracted from
an apple mitochondrial fraction,148'149 most
stud-ies indicated that the bulk of apple polyphenol
oxidase had a pH optimum of activity between
4.5 and 5.5.59,132,181.289.434,467.509 Moreover, the
en-zyme seemed relatively tolerant to acid pH,
be-cause the activity at pH 3 still represented 40% of
the maximum activity.178 Thus, control of
enzy-matic browning by acidification only is difficult
unless a very low pH is obtained
The effect of temperature on both enzymeactivity and stability has been investigated by
numerous workers.13'246-251'272-317'443 Most assays of
the activity of apple polyphenol oxidase are
car-ried out between 25 and 35°C, and it is only for
temperatures higher than 40°C that a significantthermal inactivation occurs during the assay.Compared with other enzymes responsible forfood-quality degradation, polyphenol oxidase isnot a very heat-stable enzyme.1'13-443 Therefore,this activity is rarely used as an index of blanch-ing treatment.495 A partially purified extract ofapple polyphenol oxidase had a half-life of 12min at 65°C and was destroyed at 80°C.467 Inapple juices treated at the same temperature, 30%
of the activity remained after 20 s with theGravenstein variety88 and 1 min with the Reinedes Reinettes variety.82 Both reports stressed theimportance of the pH of the juice for thermosta-bility, because for the same treatment, the re-sidual activity at pH 3 was less than 10% of thatobtained at pH 6 (maximum stability) Likewise,acidification of apple juice to pH 2 by HC1 for 45min followed by a return to the original pH withNaOH resulted in an 88% decrease of polyphenoloxidase activity.514
7 Inhibitors of Polyphenol Oxidase
This section addresses only inhibitors acting
on the enzyme The other approaches used tocontrol enzymatic browning, that is, physicalmethods and chemical agents acting on eithersubstrates or products, are examined in SectionIV.A and B Different modes of action have beenproposed for the inhibitors acting directly onpolyphenol oxidase The classification of Mayerand Harel254 contained two groups Compoundsinteracting with copper are in the first group andthose affecting the active site for the phenolicsubstrate are in the second
In the first group, inhibition by metal ionchelators such as azide,153 cyanide,90 carbon mon-oxide,2-252 tropolone,189-438 and sodium diethyl-dithiocarbamate,121-511 which are more or lessspecific for copper, is well documented forpolyphenol oxidases of different sources.Similarly, inhibition by halide ions has longbeen recognized196 for polyphenol oxidasesfrom apple46'84'179'348-349'389-400'419 and other ori-gins.25'240'303-339 In the latter case, the same authorsshowed that inhibition by halides was strongly
pH dependent, increasing when the pH was creased It was proposed that halide and copper
Trang 20formed a complex after displacement of a
proto-nated histidine from copper.25-303 A mechanism
was also postulated whereby halide binds to the
enzyme in competition with the phenolic
sub-strate only when the enzyme molecule is in the
protonated form.303 Moreover, in a comparative
study of polyphenol oxidases from different
sources, it was suggested that the degree of
en-zyme inhibition by halide ions was the result of
the balance between the stability of the
copper-halide complex responsible for inhibition and the
accessibility of the copper in the active site to the
halide ion.339 For the apple enzyme, the chloride
ion was shown to be noncompetitive,179-389 while
the other halide ions were competitive.179 The
order was F~ » Cl" > Br\I-,175>389 because at pH
4.5 the apparent Ki values were 0.07,20,106, and
HOmM, respectively.179 When the pH was
var-ied, it was postulated that the undissociated form
HF was responsible for inhibition by fluoride (in
agreement with results obtained for broad bean
polyphenol oxidase339) with a Ki close to 4 ^M.179
In addition, the apparent Ki for chloride was shown
to vary according to the equation
with pKa = 3.65 and Ki = 2.4 mil/.179 Thus, for a
pH below pKa, the limiting value of Ki,app is
2.4 mM, whereas for a pH greater than pKa, an
increase of one pH unit corresponds roughly to a
tenfold increase of the apparent Ki for chloride.179
Among inhibitors belonging to the second
group, aromatic carboxylic acids of the benzoic
and cinnamic series have been studied widely
since the first works of Kuttner and Wagreich199
and Krueger.196 Although most authors found that
these compounds were competitive inhibitors of
polyphenol oxidase because of their structural
similarities with phenolic substrates, some
au-thors indicated that the type of inhibition was
dependent on the substrate used for the assay and
was either competitive, noncompetitive, or
mixed.90-139-265-268-293-337-402 For apple, following the
substrate and the enzyme preparation used, Walker
and Wilson477 found different inhibition patterns
(mainly competitive) for substituted cinnamic
acids With 4-methylcatechol as a substrate,
Janovitz-Klapp et al.179 indicated that the 11
aro-matic carboxylic acids tested in the benzoic, namic, phenylacetic, and phenylpropionic serieswere all pure competitive inhibitors (Table 8) Itappeared that cinnamic acids were more potentinhibitors than their benzoic homologs, as the Kivalues were 2 to 30 times lower than in the ben-zoic series Moreover, in both series, the p-hy-droxy substitution slightly enhanced the inhibitoryproperties, whereas adding one or two methoxygroups in the meta position greatly decreasedinhibitor affinity for the enzyme In addition,when the carboxyl group was separated from thebenzene cycle by a methylene group as inphenylacetic acid, the inhibition was greatlyreduced However, it was partially restored by anadditional methylene group, as in phenylpropionicacid, and again enhanced by a p-hydroxy substi-tution (p-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid) There-fore, it is apparent that the substitution pattern forthe aromatic carboxylic acids leads to a similareffect for the affinity of the inhibitors and thecorresponding substrates, because the Ki values
cin-of cinnamic, benzoic, phenylpropionic, andphenylacetic acids (Table 8) are in the same order(although lower) as the Km values of caffeic,protocatechuic (o-dihydroxybenzoic), hydro-caffeic (o-dihydroxyphenylpropionic), and o-dihy-droxyphenylacetic acids (Table 7) Finally, sorbicacid is almost as efficient a competitive inhibitor
as benzoic acid.179 Thus, the presence of the zene nucleus is not an absolute requirement forthe inhibitory effect, because it can be replaced byconjugated double bonds The latter result wasalso found for apricot polyphenol oxidase.402The degree of inhibition by carboxylic acids
ben-is also pH dependent, increasing as the pH creases Following experiments with broad beanpolyphenol oxidase,339 it was proposed that theundissociated form of the acid is responsible forinhibition by forming a complex with copper atthe active center Similar results were obtainedwith a purified apple polyphenol oxidase.179 Onecan speculate that the binding site of the latterenzyme recognized conjugated double bonds thatare contained in the benzene cycle or in an unsat-urated alkyl chain When a carboxyl group waspresent, either directly bound to the benzene cycle(benzoic series) or to the conjugated double bonds(cinnamic series or sorbic acid), it could form acomplex with the copper at the active site When
Trang 21TABLE 8 Inhibition Effects of Carboxylic Acids on Purified Apple Polyphenol Oxidase at pH 4.5 in Relation to Their Structures
Acid
Benzoic p-Hydroxybenzoic Vanillic
Syringic
Cinnamic p-Coumaric Ferulic Sinapic
Phenylacetic,
Substitution P
Benzoic
OH OH OH Cinnamic
OH OH OH
m m' Series
OCH 3
Series
OCH3 OCH3 OCH3 Phenylpropionic, and Sorbic Phenylacetic
Phenylpropionic p-Hydroxyphenylpropionic OH Sorbic
App Ki (mAf)
0.64 0.57 10 34.5
0.092 0.04 0.29 15 Acids 13 1.4 1.1 0.51 Adapted from Janovitz-Klapp, A H., Richard, F C , Goupy, P M., and
Nicolas, J J., J Agric Food Chem., 38, 926, 1990 With permission.
such a structure is present in the same molecule
together with an o-diphenolic structure, the
inter-action with the o-diphenolic would be greatly
reduced, as shown by the low Vra values obtained
for caffeic and protocatechuic acids (Table 7) In
addition, when the caffeic and chlorogenic acids
are compared, the esterification of the carboxyl
group by quinic acid reduced the affinity of the
caffeoyl moiety for the apple enzyme (increase of
Km) However, it prevented formation of the
com-plex between copper and the vicinal
undissoci-ated carboxyl group, leaving the metal free for the
catalysis of o-diphenol oxidation, as illustrated by
the large increase of Vm (Table 7)
Use of cinnamic acids to control enzymaticbrowning in fruit juices has been suggested.471
Cinnamic acid added to Granny Smith juice at
concentrations greater than 0.5 mM resulted in an
inhibition of browning for over 7 h.471 However,
apple plugs dipped in 10 mAf sodium cinnamate
were protected for several hours but then
exhib-ited a severe browning over extended storagetimes.369 It has been proposed that cinnamic acidmay undergo gradual conversion at the cut sur-face to a polyphenol oxidase substrate bycinnamate hydroxylase and other enzymes in-volved in the biosynthesis of phenols.369 Similarresults obtained with sodium benzoate led theauthors to recommend not using these aromaticcarboxylic acids as components of antibrowningformulations.369
The substituted resorcinols, which are alsostructurally related to phenolic substrates, wererecently recognized as polyphenol oxidase inhibi-tors.262-263 In a structure-activity study on a series
of 4-substituted resorcinols, the highest inhibitionwas obtained for hydrophobic substituents in the4-position such as 4-hexyl, 4-dodecyl, and4-cyclohexyl resorcinols.263 The same authors in-dicated that 4-hexyl resorcinol can be used for thebrowning control of fresh and hot-air dried appleslices as well as of apple juice.263 In addition, they
Trang 22claimed that 4-hexyl resorcinol has several
ad-vantages over sulfites for the prevention of shrimp
melanosis and for use in foods in general
Kojic acid
[5-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-4-pyrone] has been shown to inhibit fungal
tyrosi-nase.375 Recently, it was found that it had an
inhibitory effect on plant and crustacean
poiyphe-noi oxidases.49 It is a competitive inhibitor for the
oxidation of chlorogenic acid and catechol by
apple poiyphenoi oxidase.49 In addition, this
com-pound can reduce pigments or pigment precursors
to colorless compounds.48
Oxalate has been shown to inhibit poiyphenoi
oxidase in two ways: (1) upon incubation, it slowly
inactivated the enzyme following a first-order
kinetic in the enzyme and (2) it acted as a
com-petitive inhibitor of o-diphenol oxidation by
fun-gal507 and apple331 poiyphenoi oxidases The
addition of copper can restore the activity lost in
the first process, as was shown for the fungal507
and spinach377 enzymes
Finally, a mixed type of inhibition by several
natural aliphatic alcohols was reported for grape
poiyphenoi oxidase.440 Inhibition seemed mainly
related to the hydrophobic chain rather than to the
alcohol function.440 To our knowledge, no study
was carried out on these compounds with the
apple enzyme
8 Secondary Reactions Affecting
o-Quinones
The primary products of enzymatic oxidation
are o-quinones These molecules have different
spectral properties, and their color mainly pends on the pH and phenol from which theyoriginate.421 Thus, after oxidation, catechin isbright yellow with a maximum absorbance at 380
de-nm, chlorogenic acid is a dull orange-yellow with
a maximum at 420 nm, and DOPA droxyphenylalanine) is pink with a maximum close
(o-dihy-to 480 nm The molar extinction coefficients atthe maximum wavelengths are given in Table 9and show a wide range of variation
Moreover, the o-quinones are reactive pounds,110-269-350 as illustrated in Figures 4 and 5.o-Quinones can react with another molecule ofphenol, resulting in dimers of the original phe-
com-no126i,395,508 (reaction 1, Figure 4) These dimers,having an o-diphenolic structure, can be subject
to reoxidation52-395 either enzymically or by other o-quinone, resulting in the formation oflarger oligomers with different color intensities.The o-quinones can also react with a differentphenol molecule, either leading to a copolymer orregenerating the original phenol and giving a dif-ferent o-quinone by coupled oxidation (reactions
an-2 and 3, Figure 4).51-54-296-331Reactions can also occur with nonphenoliccompounds (Figure 5) Thus, another coupledoxidation was observed with ascorbic acid (reac-tion 1), giving the regeneration of the phenol withformation of dehydroascorbic acid.420 With sulfites(reaction 2), colorless addition compounds areformed99-378-395-479 together with regenerated phe-nol,317 although the latter possibility remainedquestionable The o-quinones also form additioncompounds with thiol groups by nucleophilic
TABLE 9 Molar Extinction Coefficient of Quinones from Different o-Diphenolic Substrates of Poiyphenoi Oxidase
(Wavelength at Maximum of Absorbance)
o-Diphenolic Substrate
Pyrocatecho!
4-f-Butylcatechol L-DOPA
3,4-Dihydrophenylacetic acid 4-Methylcatechol
Hydrocaffeic Chlorogenic acid
Wavelength
(nm)
390 400 480 390 400 412 420
Extinction coefficient
1417 1150 3388 1311 1400 1124 2000
Ref
463 463 463 463 463 463 351
Trang 23FIGURE 4 Reactions of o-quinones with phenolic compounds (All reactions are nonenzymatic except those with polyphenol oxidases; reactions 2 and 3 are able to regenerate the original phenol.) Products with different color
intensities are indicated by asterisks (From Rouet-Mayer, M A., Philippon, J., and Nicolas, J., Encyclopaedia in
Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition, McRae, R., Robinson, R K., and Sadler, M J., Eds., Vol 1, Academic
Press, London, 1993, 499 With permission.)
additions (reactions 3 and 4) Cysteine, either
free 91.243,275,308,341,359 Q r b o u n d i n s m a U p e p
tides57-156-309 or large proteins,310 gives colorless
compounds Although these compounds have an
o-diphenolic structure, they are not a substrate of
polyphenol oxidase58-329-359'397 but can either be
oxidized by laccase355 or react with an excess of
o-quinones by a coupled oxidation mechanism332
and form intensely colored products Nucleophilic
additions also occur with amino groups of amino
acids or peptides.243-309 Both primary (e.g., serine39)
and secondary (e.g., proline437) amines form
addi-tion compounds with o-quinones (reacaddi-tions 5 and
6) Moreover, further substitutions with thiol
(re-action 4) or amine (re(re-action 7) groups contained
in proteins may occur, leading to the formation of
intra- or intermolecular cross-links.250-264-311
Fi-nally, water can be added slowly to the ones79*333 to form triphenols that are readily oxi-dized by polyphenol oxidase or by excesso-quinones, leading to the p-quinones (reaction8) The last pathway was favored by acid
o-quin-p J J 124,125,183,333
The reactivity (or in other terms, the stability)
of the o-quinones in these different pathways ishighly variable The nature of the phenol oxidized
as well as the oxidation conditions (medium, pH,temperature, etc.) are determinant Thus, it wasshown that in the same conditions, o-quinonesfrom 4-methylcatechol were more stable than thosefrom chlorogenic acid, which in turn were morestable than those from catechins.333 Obviously,the presence of reactive molecules, with amino orthiol groups, in the medium can greatly affect the
Trang 24FIGURE 5 Reactions of o-quinones with nonphenolic compounds (All reactions are nonenzymatic except those
with laccase; reactions 1 to 3, 6, and 8 are able to regenerate the original phenol.) Products with different color intensities are indicated by asterisks Ox, further oxidation reactions by oxygen or o-quinone; Pr-SH and Pr-NH 2 , proteins; Pro-NH, Proline; AA-NH 2 , amino acids; Asc A, ascorbic acid; DHA, dehydroascorbic acid; FTSH, small thiol
compounds (e.g., cysteine or glutathione) (From Rouet-Mayer, M A., Philippon, J., and Nicolas, J., Encyclopaedia
of Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition, McRae, R., Robinson, R K., and Sadler, M J., Eds., Vol 1,
Academic Press, London, 1993, 499 With permission.)
reactivity of o-quinones The secondary products
formed may or may not be good substrates for
polyphenol oxidase and may exhibit differences
in their reactivities with o-quinones
C Other Factors
1 Ascorbic Acid in Apple and Apple
Products
Ascorbic acid is a powerful reducing agent
and in its presence the enzymically formed
o-quinones are converted back to their precursor
Therefore, this compound could play a role in theextent of tissue browning after bruising.236 Com-pared with many other fruits, apples are not veryrich in vitamin C Recent surveys gave a meancontent of 50 mg/kg (FW basis).214496 However,large differences were found among samples, asvalues varied between 30 and 370 mg/kg Manyfactors can be responsible for these variations, forexample, variety214 and maturity stage before488and after harvest.496 The peel contains more ascor-bic acid than the pulp as well as the side exposed
to the sun compared with the shaded side.100 nally, because of oxidation losses during process-ing, the ascorbic acid content in apple juice isalmost zero, - although some retention was
Trang 25found in freeze-concentrate enriched juice.417 In
apple puree, a rapid decrease of ascorbic acid
content was shown after blending, with a
con-comitant increase in dehydroascorbic acid,
result-ing in almost no loss in total vitamin C content.274
Nevertheless, it seemed that endogen ascorbic
acid levels did not play a major role in limiting
the extent of browning.230-488 Recently, a HPLC
procedure was developed for the determination of
ascorbic acid, dehydroascorbic acid, and ascorbic
acid-2-phosphate in raw apple samples
supple-mented with ascorbic acid or ascorbic
acid-2-phosphate to prevent browning.365
2 Peroxidase in Apple and Apple
Products
Peroxidases are ubiquitous enzymes in fruitsand vegetables that are able to oxidize a large
number of molecules.342'343-443 However, few
stud-ies have been devoted to the peroxidase system of
apple Peroxidase activity was proposed as a
pos-sible parameter of ripening and senescence of
Golden Delicious apples,134 although the
isoen-zyme patterns did not change during this period.31
Activity was found to vary significantly with
cul-tivar, picking date, and storage period, but
with-out any regularity for the three cultivars tested.447
Peroxidase appeared to be more concentrated in
the peel than in the pulp.285-330 For eight cultivars
picked at commercial maturity, the lowest
peroxi-dase activity (Mclntosh var.) in peel represented
22% of the highest (Red Delicious var.).330
After partial purification, at least three zymes were characterized from either peel330 or
isoen-pulp.286 The major isoenzyme, the less heat
stable,286 was cationic, with a pHi close to 9.286330
Although separated by ion exchange
chroma-tography, all isoenzymes eluted in a single peak
in gel filtration corresponding to a molecular
weight of 40 kDa.330 The optimum for activity
was close to pH 5.8, a value that is in the range
given for peroxidase activity extracted from other
fruits.272-443 Moreover, apple peroxidase was able
to oxidize not only chlorogenic acid and
(+)-catechin, but also several quercetin
glyco-sides by a ping-pong, bireactant mechanism.330
Thus, the glycosylated flavonols, which are not a
substrate for polyphenol oxidase, can be degraded
by apple peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen
peroxide Note that horseradish peroxidase is alsoable to oxidize kaempferol,273 quercetin,383 andother flavonoids.77-382 However, to our knowledge,
no direct correlation has been found betweenperoxidase activity and the browning susceptibil-ity of apple varieties
Other works were not directly concerned withthe fruit, but, rather, the embryo,353 root-stocks,267-458-459-482-483 or cell cultures.26 All thesestudies used electrophoretic methods in order tocharacterize the peroxidase polymorphism for theidentification of apple cultivars
III RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTENSITY OF BROWNING AND BROWNING PARAMETERS
A Methods for Evaluation of Browning
Accurate methods are required for the surement of browning in tissue slices and ex-tracts This need is obvious when different cultivarsare compared for susceptibility to browning or forevaluation of experimental treatments designed
mea-to control enzymatic browning.12Basically, two kinds of methods are avail-able.236 The first uses absorbance measurements,usually in the 400-nm region, on solutions afterextraction and purification of the brown pig-ments.488 The second uses reflectometry ortristimulus colorimetry and can be applied di-rectly to cut surfaces or fruit puree.364-442 Althoughboth methods are easy and rapid, they do haveserious disadvantages
Absorbance measurements evaluate only thesoluble pigments It is well known that, as thereaction proceeds, polymerization occurs and thesolubility of a large part of the brown pigmentsdecreases.395 The insoluble entities are eliminatedduring the filtration and centrifugation steps inthe purification process Moreover, depending onthe kind of pigments, which in turn depend on theoriginal phenols and their relative proportions,the wavelength of maximum absorbance rangesbetween 360 and 500 nm Therefore, absorbancemeasurements at a single wavelength correlatepoorly with visual evaluation of browning
In order to obtain information on the relativeimportance of browning parameters, it has been