-There are 2 types of milk biscuit from different brands, biscuit’s packages need to be removed in oder to avoid supposing from participants -Participants are guilded to know the test pr
Trang 1HANOI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF BIOLOGY & FOOD TECHNOLOGY
LAB REPORT SENSORIAL EVALUATION BF4522E
(724580) Group: 3
No Student name Student ID
HANOI, 12/2022
Trang 2Practice 3: Descriptive test (profile)
1 Purpose
2 Principle
3 Procedure
● 3.1 Milk Biscuit
● 3.2 Milk Candy
4 Result
Practice 4: Food sensory analysis by rating method based on TCVN 3215-79
1 Purpose
2 Principle
3 Procedure
● 3.1 Milk Biscuit
● 3.2 Milk Candy
4 Result
PRACTICE 3
Trang 3DESCRIPTIVE TESTS (PROFILE) 1.Purpose
● Determine the nature and intensity of the products’ differences 2.Principle
Descriptive tests (or profiles) include 2 or more samples and panelists are required to identify whether there is a difference in a specific sensory property between these samples and how is the magnitude of this difference This test is used after we know the samples are different and we want to know the character of this difference This test requires 3 steps:
● Select the properties that need to evaluate;
● Conduct preliminary tests so that we can agree on how to use the given intensity scale
● Evaluate the intensity of selected properties
The person in charge of the experiment or the leader of each experimental group records the scores given by each member and calculates the average value for each sample for each criterion.This average value is then presented on the line chart or spider web chart The results table is used to calculate the significant difference between 2 samples: by t-test (in case of 1 criterion) or F-test (in case of all criteria) 3.Procedure
3.1 Materials:
(15 panelists) -30 dishes -30 biscuits (15 type A and 15 type B) -30 candies (15 type A and 15 type B) -30 cups of water
3.2 Milk biscuit
- Prepare 30 dishes including (15 dishes coded A and 15 dishes coded B)
Trang 4-There are 2 types of milk biscuit from different brands, biscuit’s packages need to be removed in oder to avoid supposing from participants
-Participants are guilded to know the test procedure and how to fill in the answer sheet Criteria includes:
A Apperance and condition: Color, Shape, Brittleness, Elasticity
B Aroma: Characteristics candy smell, Caramel smell, Sour smell
C Flavour: Crispness,Melting in the mouth, Burning taste, Rancidity taste, Musty taste, Sweetness, Dusty taste
-Each participant receives a set including a dish of sample A and a dish of sample B, and a cup of water to refresh their taste
-Participants try each sample, then evaluate the score (1-9) and fill in the answer sheet -Answer sheet are collected to be analysed
3.3 Milk candy
- Prepare 30 dishes including (15 dishes coded A and 15 dishes coded B) -There are 2 types of milk candy from different brands, candy’s packages need to be removed in oder to avoid supposing from participants
-Participants are guilded to know the test procedure and how to fill in the answer sheet The criteria includes:
A Apperance and condition: Color, Shape, Brittleness, Elasticity
B Aroma: Characteristics candy smell, Caramel smell, Sour smell
C Flavour: Crispness,Melting in the mouth, Burning taste, Rancidity taste, Musty taste, Sweetness, Dusty taste
-Each participant has a set including a dish of sample A and a dish of sample B, and a cup of water to refresh their taste
-Participants try each sample, then evaluate the score (1-9) and fill in the answer sheet -Answer sheet are collected to be analysed
4.Result
Trang 5Product: Milk biscuit
Data processing
- Number of panelists: 15
a Results for sample A
Scores of each member Criterion T
1
T 2
T 3
T4 T 5
T6 T7 T
8
T9 T1 0
T1 1
T1 2
T1 3
T1 4
T1 5
Av g
A Appearance and condition Color 3 5 6 7 7 6 4.
5
8 5.
4 4.4 5.4 7 5.4 4.4 6.4 5.7 Shape 3 7 8 8.
5
8 4.
5
7.
5
6 5.
2 4.2 6.4 7 8.5 6.4 7.2 6.5 Crispness 4 7 8 7 7 6 5.
5
9 4.
8 3.8 7 7 5.5 6.5 7 6.3
B Aroma Characteristi
c biscuit smell
5 6 6 9 9 5.
5
6.
5
8 6.
2 5.4 6.2 8 6.6 7.4 8.4 6.9
Buttery smell 4 7 7 5 6 5.
5
5.
5
7 7 5.5 3.5 7 5 6.4 8.8 6.0 Burning
smell
2 3 7 1 5 5.
5
1.
5
1 6 5.4 3.5 3 4 6.4 1 3.7 Floury smell 4 6 4 1 7 5.
5
1.
5
7 4.
2 3.5 4.5 4 7 6.4 2.4 4.5 Musty smell 1 2 2 1 1 5.
5
1.
5
1 3.
8 3.4 1 1 2 1 1 1.9
C Flavor Crispness 4 7 8 7 6 6 6.
5
8 4.
2 4.4 6 6 6 5 9 6.2 Melting in
the mouth
4 6 2 5 5 5 1.
5
4 5.
8 5.4 7.5 7 5 6.8 6.2 5.1 Stickiness 1 3 1 1 8 5 4.
5
1 5.
2 5.4 1 6 7 1 1 3.4 Rancidity
taste
1 1 1 1 1 3.
2
1 1 3.
5 3.5 1 1 3 1 1 1.6 Sweetness 4 6 5 6 6 4 7 6 6.
5 6.6 7 4 8 4.2 5 5.7 Saltiness 2 1 5 1 3 3 1 2 5.
4 6.2 3 2 5 1 2 2.8 Dusty taste 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 5.
4
6 1 1 4 4.2 5 2.4
b Results for sample B
Scores of each member Criterion T
1
T 2
T 3
T4 T 5
T6 T7 T8 T9 T1
0
T1 1
T1 2
T1 3
T1 4
T1 5
Av g
A Appearance and condition Color 8 6 7 6.
5
8 7 6.
5
6 6.
8 6.2 7.2 5 6.5 7.4 7.6 6.8 Shape 8 7 8 9 6 4.
5
8.
5
7 3.
8 3.5 5.5 8 7.2 5.4 7.8 6.6 Crispness 8 8 8 9 8 8 8.
5
7.
2
6 5.5 7.2 8 8.5 7.4 7.5 7.7
B Aroma Characteristi
c biscuit smell
4 7 8 7.
5
6 2.
5
5.
5
8 4.
8 4.8 5.2 6 4.6 5.4 6.2 5.7
Trang 6Buttery smell 3 7 6 5 6 2.
5
6.
5
6 3.
5 3.5 2.5 6 6 5.4 5.4 5.0 Burning
smell
3 3 7 1 4 2.
5
2.
5
1 3.
8 3.8 2.5 2 2 4.4 3.2 3.0 Floury smell 3 6 4 1 5 2.
5
2.
5
7 5.
2 5.2 3.4 5 7 5.2 2.4 4.3 Musty smell 1 2 2 1 1 2.
5
2.
5
1 2.
5 2.2 1 1 2 1 1 1.6
C Flavor Crispness 8 7 8 9 8 8 7.
5
8 5.
5
5 7.5 7 8 6 8 7.4 Melting in
the mouth
5 7 2 5 3 3 1 4 3.
4 3.6 6.4 6 4 5.5 7 4.4 Stickiness 1 3 1 1 8 5 3.
5
1 3.
1 3.2 1 5 5 1 1 2.9 Rancidity
taste
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 2.8 1 1 1.5 Sweetness 3 8 6 4 4 7 6 6 4.
2 4.2 7.5 4 6 6.4 6.5 5.5 Saltiness 2 1 4 1 4 1.
8
1 3 3.
6
4 3 2 5 1 2 2.6 Dusty taste 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 6 7 1 1 3 5.4 4 2.6
Result performance
1 Line graph
2 Spider web graph
Trang 8Product: Milk candy
Data processing
- Number of panelists: 15
a Results for sample A
Scores of each member Criterion T
1
T 2
T 3
T 4
T 5
T6 T 7
T8 T9 T1
0
T1 1
T1 2
T1 3
T1 4
T1 5
Av g
A Appearance and condition Color 7 6 8 9 5 6.
6
8 6 7.
5
6 4.4 6.4 7 7.4 4 6.6 Shape 7 7 5 7 6 7.
5
6 8 7.
5
7 4.4 5.4 7.4 6 4.2 6.4 Brittleness 8 5 1 8 1 8 1 2.
5
5.
5
1 4.8 7.4 7 7 4.8 4.8 Elasticity 5 6 3 2 2 4 7 8 1.
5
6 3.5 7.4 8.5 6 4 4.9
B Aroma Characteristi
c candy smell
6 4 4 3 2 4 7 4 4.
5
5 3.1 5.4 3 6.5 3.7 4.3
Caramel smell
5 4 2 5 3 2 6 2 3.
2
2 3 4.2 6.5 3 3.5 3.6 Burning
smell
2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1.
5
1 3.5 3.5 1 3 4 1.9 Sour smell 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 4.5 1.8 1 2 5 1.8
C Flavor Crispness 1 3 6 1 1 7 2 1 1.
5
1 1.8 1 1.3 2 3.2 2.3 Melting in
the mouth
6 4 2 6 5 3 3 5 1.
5
2 4.2 2.2 6 6 4.8 4.0 Burning taste 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 1.
5
1 3.8 1 1 1 4.6 1.8 Rancidity
taste
1 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 1 3.2 1 1 1 3.4 1.7 Sweetness 7 7 8 8 3 5 4 9 4.
8
7 5.5 7.4 7 7 5.4 6.3 Musty taste 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3.5 1 1 1 3.8 1.7 Dusty taste 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 2.6 1 4 1 3.8 1.9
b Results for sample B
Scores of each member Criterion T
1
T 2
T 3
T4 T 5
T6 T 7
T8 T9 T1
0
T1 1
T1 2
T1 3
T1 4
T1 5
Av g
A Appearance and condition Color 6 7 7 7 6 7.
8
7 5 8.
2
7 4.8 5.4 8 6.4 5.1 6.5 Shape 8 7 7 9 7 5 5 6 4 8 5.4 6.4 8.4 7 5.5 6.6
Trang 95 5 Brittleness 5 3 1 2 1 6 1 1 2.
5
1 4.4 4.4 7.5 5 4.2 3.3 Elasticity 8 8 6 8 2 8 8 9 7.
5
7 5 4.4 7.4 7.4 5.1 6.7
B Aroma Characteristi
c candy smell
7 6 8 7 3 7 7 6 6.
5
5 6 7.4 5 7 5.3 6.2
Caramel smell
7 5 3 5 4 3 7 4 5.
5
2 6.4 6.4 8 4 5.8 5.1 Burning
smell
2 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1.
5
1 7.2 2.5 1 3 5.2 2.3 Sour smell 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 4.2 2.8 1 3 5 2.0
C Flavor Crispness 1 2 3 1 1 4 1 1 5.
5
1 4.8 1 1.5 1 5 2.3 Melting in
the mouth
7 7 2 8 6 6 5 6 5.
5
2 4.5 4.4 8 7 5 5.6 Burning taste 2 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2.
5
1 4.5 1 1 1 5.2 2.0 Rancidity
taste
1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3.8 1 1 1 4.8 1.6 Sweetness 6 8 9 8.
5
4 6 6 9 3.
5
6 3.8 5.5 8 6 4.6 6.3 Musty taste 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 5.5 1.6 Dusty taste 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4.8 1 1 1 5.2 1.8
Result performance
1 Line graph
2 Spider web graph
Trang 11PRACTICE 4:
FOOD SENSORY ANALYSIS BY RATING METHOD
BASED OF TCVN 3215 - 79 1.Purpose
● The rating method is used to evaluate the quality level of a product against a standard or another product of the same type on all the sensory criteria: color, taste, condition,
2.Principle The quality condition of each criterion is assessed by scores The increase in score is the increase in quality Based on the rating method in TCVN 3215-79, scoring is on a scale from 0 to 5, in which a score of 0 means “defective” quality to the assessed criteria, and from 1 to 5 means that the defect decreases gradually The overall quality
of the product is assessed on a 20-points scale
Importance Factor: Because each criterion has a different effect on the overall quality
of the product, the score values for each criterion are multiplied by 1 corresponding value called the importance factor The more important criterion has a larger importance factor The importance factors for a food product are given in advance, and the sum of the importance factors of all the criteria evaluated for a product equals 4 When evaluating the quality of a product following TCVN 3215-79, the quality score
of a criterion is an average score (also known as the average score without an importance factor) multiple to its importance factor The result of this multiple is called the average score with an importance factor The sum of all the criteria is the overall quality score of the product This score determined the quality of the assessed product
3.Procedure
3.1 Materials:
(15 panelists) -30 dishes -30 biscuits (15 type A and 15 type B) -30 candies (15 type A and 15 type B)
Trang 12-30 cups of water
3.2 Milk biscuit
- Prepare 30 dishes including (15 dishes coded A and 15 dishes coded B) -There are 2 types of milk biscuit from different brands, biscuit’s packages need to be removed in oder to avoid supposing from participants
-Participants are guilded to know the test procedure and how to fill in the answer sheet Criteria includes: Outside condition, Inside condition, Aroma, Taste
-Each participant receives a set including a dish of sample A and a dish of sample B, and a cup of water to refresh their taste
-Participants try each sample, then evaluate the score (0-5) and fill in the answer sheet -Answer sheet are collected to be analysed
3.3 Milk candy
- Prepare 30 dishes including (15 dishes coded A and 15 dishes coded B) -There are 2 types of milk candy from different brands, candy’s packages need to be removed in oder to avoid supposing from participants
-Participants are guilded to know the test procedure and how to fill in the answer sheet Criteria includes: Outside condition, Inside condition, Aroma, Taste
-Each participant receives a set including a dish of sample A and a dish of sample B, and a cup of water to refresh their taste
-Participants try each sample, then evaluate the score (0-5) and fill in the answer sheet
-Answer sheet are collected to be analysed 4.Result
Trang 13Product: Milk biscuit
Result
Criterion Scores of each member
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9
T10
Total
Average score w/o importance factor
Importance factor
Average score with importance factor Outside condition A 5; 5; 3; 4; 5; 5; 4; 3; 3; 3; 4; 2; 3; 3; 3 55 3.67
0,8
2.936
B 4; 4; 4; 3; 3; 3; 5; 4; 3; 3; 2; 5; 3; 4; 5 55 3.67 2.936
Inside condition A 5; 5; 4; 4; 3; 4; 5; 4; 4; 4; 3; 2; 3; 4; 5 59 3.93
1
3.93
B 5; 5; 3; 3; 4; 4; 5; 3; 4; 2; 2; 5; 4; 4; 4 57 3.80 3.80
Aroma A 4; 4; 4; 3; 5; 2; 4; 3; 4; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 5 53 3.53
0,2
0.706
B 2; 2; 3; 2; 3; 3; 5; 5; 4; 3; 2; 2; 4; 4; 3 47 3.13 0.626
Taste A 4; 4; 4; 3; 4; 3; 5; 3; 3; 4; 4; 2; 2; 3; 5 53 3.53
2
7.06
B 3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 5; 4; 4; 4; 2; 3; 3; 4; 4; 4 53 3.53 7.06
Quality score : - A: 14.6
- B: 14.2
Product: Milk candy
Criterion Scores of each member
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15
Total Average
score w/o importance factor
Importance facor
Average score with importance factor Outside condition A 3,3,4,4,4,3,4,4,4,3,3,3,4,3,4 53 3.53 0.8 2.83
B 4,3,5,3,5,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,3,4,3 58 3.87 3.09 Inside condition A 3,2,4,4,3,4,4,4,2,3,3,4,4,4,4 52 3.47 1 3.47
B 4,4,5,5,5,3,4,4,4,4,3,3,3,3,4 58 3.87 3.87 Aroma A 2,2,3,2,2,2,4,2,2,4,2,3,2,2,2 36 2.4 0.2 0.48
B 3,3,3,5,5,5,4,2,4,5,4,4,5,3,5 60 4 0.8 Taste A 2,2,3,3,2,5,0,2,2,3,2,3,2,4,2 37 2.47 2 4.93
B 3,4,3,5,5,4,4,2,4,3,5,4,4,2,4 56 3.73 7.47
Quality score: - A:11.71 -B:15.23