1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

restructuring engineering education potx

69 115 0
Tài liệu được quét OCR, nội dung có thể không chính xác
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Restructuring Engineering Education
Trường học Vietnam University of Science and Technology
Chuyên ngành Engineering Education
Thể loại Báo cáo
Thành phố Hà Nội
Định dạng
Số trang 69
Dung lượng 5,95 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Restructuring Engineering Education: A Focus on Change Report of an NSF Workshop on Engineering Education S5 sion of Undergraduate Education Directorate for Education and Human Resour

Trang 1

Restructuring Engineering Education:

A Focus on Change

Report of an NSF Workshop on

Engineering Education

S5

sion of Undergraduate Education

Directorate for Education and Human Resources

Rie iveres aan hc

Trang 2

Carolyn Meyers Georgia Institute of Technology

Rapporteur: Edward W Ernst University of South Carolina

ion of Undergraduate Education

Directorate for Education and Human Resources

National Science Foundation

April 1995,

Trang 3

Diselnimers The opinions cxpresed in thiseport ar those of the workshop pasate and donot necessary represen NSF poi Thelocommendtions are anger ee at NSF

Questions maybe dete

‘DUE tection Center 703/36.1666

Division of Undereradute Education (DUE)

‘atonl Scene Foundation

‘Teleptionl Devie for the Deaf NSF hs TDD (Teleponie Deve forthe Deaf) epi which enables snails wih bear impaimcs to communis with the Division of Homan Resource Mansyemert for lnvomaton iain io NSF programs employment or gene information This umber s 70) 106-000,

Trang 4

DATION

January 15, 1995

Dr Neal F Lane, Direetor

"National Science Foundation

Daring June 6-9, 1994, 65 participants, representing engineering faculty, engineering education

‘coalitions, engineering societies, industry, and students, met The purpose of their meeting was

to explore issues important to the continuing development of high quality engineering curricula Which are relevant to the needs of our society as it moves into the twenty-first century During the three days, participants worked in groups representative of the various constituencies (0 develop recommendations that will provide a basis for future activities and projects designed to improve the quality of undergraduate engineering education Through their joint efforts, and with expanded support from NSF and others, academia and industry can work together to achieve comprehensive reform of undergraduate engineering education The reform of undergraduate engineering education will better prepare graduating engineers for entering a varity of professions and provide expanded access to the contextual richness of engincering coursework for aon-majors,

Sincerely,

Dither 8: Wiliams

Assistant Director

Trang 5

Menor enn OMEN

January 8, 1995

Dr Robert F Watson, Director

Division of Undergraduate Education

"National Science Foundation

Held June 6-9, 1994, the workshop developed recommendations for improving the ability of engineering education to better meet the needs of the twenty-first century The 65 participants represented engincering faculty, engineering education coalitions, engineering societies, industry, and students,

‘Workshop participants were organized info four working groups: students, faculty, curricula, and experiential leaming Each participant was assigned to two working groups to assure

‘maximum interaction and communication,

(On behalf of the members of the planning comunite, the chairs and scribes of the working

‘soups, and all other participants, { submit this report to NSE in the spirit of cooperation, collaboration, and optimism for the future of engineering education I encourage NSF, in cooperation with other federal agencies, academia, engineering societies, and industry to take a leadership role in implementing the recommendations in the report

(On behalf of all participants in the workshop, I wish to extend thanks to Drs Norman Fortenberry, Don Kirk, Chalmers Sechrist, and Jack Weintraub of the Division of Undergraduate Favcation at NSF Your continued commitment to engineering edueation and your recognition

of the potentially central role of engineering edocation to comprehensive reform of undergraduate education, particularly the preparation of future teachers, i applauded

Georgia Institute of Technology

Trang 6

PREFA

Within the contest of seking o understand heuer the programmatic implications ofthe baad changes nese for nginccring edition, the Natonal Science Foundation's Division of Undergrste Edveron (DUE) cooperation with the Division of Engineering Education and Centers (EEC) organized the Workshop on Resracing Engineering Edacaon The Wotksbop, bald June 69, 1994 eluded 6S selaced parlpants repreening individ! iovetzatn, engeving education craliion, Technology Reinvestment Propam

‘lone enginecring sites, the National Resch Caunei's (NRC's) osed on Engineering Edition, te

“American Soeety for Enginesrng Edveaon (ASEE) Engineering Deans’ Council inst, and students The

‘hare was fo adivess the cucu content (lacludingexpeentalontestua leaiag aves) andthe brood iademic femework of an enpnering education which i eapnsve tothe new challenges of em incoinghy Inerdependent global society

‘he report peoviding the background

Trang 7

RECOMMENDATIONS veornnennnne

[RESTRUCTURING ENGINEERING EDUCATION: A FOCUS ON CHANGE 3

[ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS 1%

‘Edcatin forthe Manufacturing World ofthe Future I

“Enginering Eduction and Pratl he Unie Sates “Phgirering UmâzgraduaC Edrewlo TỶ 2

[NSE Diseptnary Workshops on Undergraduate Education 8

Trang 8

Cit nrasouctre System Research

Enginerng Education: Ianvation trough Tnieration

Publ Infrastuctre Research

The Long View

Report on the 1993 Industry Suri

Soeinengincering

Whats tthe End of te Technologic! Rainbow?

Engineers: The Navigators fora SusininablePaaire

Engineering a Sustmable Petre

‘Suing forthe Puture

Reengineering Engineering Education

Taking the Lead

Engineering Education ino Changing Word

Majer tues In Engineering Education

Trang 10

TT

1 Engineering Education Must Encourage Multiple Thrusts for Diversity Eventhough enginceing and spnering edn are mare diverse now han inthe pas challenges to our society Gemand even moe, i

nh kg mồ đaye, locladne:

‘Edvitional and profesional dives among fab:

Ethie, acl an gender diversity among faculty and stents,

‘vest in cada baskeround and experiences among rade; nd

iver in planed elucalonal experiences that respond othe demands ofa diverse wetkpace incleding Integrate laboratory experiences which pores inguiry, relevance, tnd hands-on experience ina vsiety

sf context

2, Engineering Education neds a new system of faculty rewards and incentives, Faculty peosve he present system to focus on dicpinry researc snd publication hs focus must be expanded to inlade teaching

‘estrc, advising and scvice na way that inclodes al faculy a aed colleagues

5 Assessment and evaluation proceses must encourage desired expectations fr both faculty and students Nar fpvencs te dsivoe ua fade cle couelbaas create eepeded spect

Methods fr eating stent ors mst promote tudei min and

‘Cael assesment of teaching and leaming is nesded fo identify suecesfl educational innovation and encourage adaption adoption by ober

4, ‘The changer needed for engineering education require comprehensive change acros the campus, nat jus,

la the engincering eologe As refed inthe previous items, colleges and universes mist take new proaches toward sen, faulty and cuicla These changes can ot credibly be ited to ngmecing Colleges, bt wll necessarily ental a comprehensive reform of undergraduate docaton,

Trang 11

Diversity for al aspect of cngineving ehzuien sen to tea comersone ofthe rexrocared ene To

‘encourage diversity requires rewards and incentives compatible withthe dvrsy we sek Siniary, changes in

‘our expcations fr neni and inthe reardsuctre underscore new apposshesoasesmet and evan

gf ficuly, stuns, courses, cuiela and programs in engineering education, The recommendation for ompreheasive change across the campus recognizes ht enginering education must function as part ofthe larger campus seins

Workshop dscusions focused et on the recommendations per ss, bat on four aspects crcl for engineering duction sade, fc, experiential esming, nd cuscl

Students are cent to the educational process As such they shoud be ave paripat ia the educations transformation process The educational experince should develop the molation, capably, and krowledpe bate

We must encourage faulty to assume a more active role ot aly inte implementation delivery ofthe eucatona experience forthe student, but alo in the laneraton and continous improvement neces for eninerng duetiono mes the challenges Changes inte reward retire an he ssessment proces are more cfim for acouragng fealty changes than fr ether ars

Enginsrng curricula should be broad and exible, rparing student for both leadership nd specialist roles ina

‘variety of eae areas Each euiculum shouldbe designed wo develop graduates who ae lifelong leamers and fontrbuters to the profession, uly capable of suceeding inthe cient and fue pobl, ma-iphinry Imuhepace The lemmin experiences for which the curiclom the cet par shoul aceammodae aod seve stodents wit varios leaning sles Purr, engnering education shuld provide n opportunity for no-majors twat eaginerng topes and concepts and should work to make these sulle ccesnibe to non-ajor

Trang 12

RESTRUCTURING ENGINEERING EDUCATION: A FOCUS ON CHANGE

‘Over the past $0 years fas probed engineering education, Each hàn a suecesson of gi [L9]

‘scknowleged the ene tobe a vit prt ofthe

tot higher education with many stents and

‘Sintibtons Each leo noted changes o semen

fnaincering eduction and some offered challenges fer bond changes Over this balfceniry period

‘nginouing edition bas changed and, loueh

‘mos ofthe changes canbe nod os neemetal fhe

oninious change sums to changes of sgniiast

[roportins In hi nt deade ofthe 200 century,

the, need for swesping changes in engineering

flucauon appears more eee thn at any te i

the pas sevenl decades, Most eet, ors ave

‘een sponsored by the Nao! Resereh Coune's

(NRC'S) Board on Enginsrng [10] andthe

“American “Society for Engineering Eavcation's

(ASEES) Eegineeing Deas’ Counel (11) Each

teengheieml tni cụande upon are ells for

fhange Each also avied, among ther tins, Tnceasedatention bythe federal goverment 1 he

ech ofengloeringedveaton

Within the context of seking to understand beter he

‘ogammatic impliaons of the broad changes

Aesdel for engineering elucaon, the National

Science Foundation’s Divison of” Undergraduate

cation (DUE) in cooperation withthe Division of

Enginering Education and Center (EEC) organized

the Workshop cơm Resirscaring Bxgnering Education’ 4 Sytems Approach 10 Ingrated

Cure which wat eld Jone 69, 1994 The

partians represented individual investiga,

rgineringedveation couHlens Techeology

Reinvestment Progrim _celions, eninerng

socitiey the NRC's Board con Engineering

eatin, the ASEE Engineering Deans’ Council,

industry, and students The charg was to adress he

‘uric conet (isang experiential ontextal

Teaming ctvites) and te mai academic

famework of at engncring edvcation which i

responsive othe new challenges of a icreasinly

interdependent global society The pstcians were

crganized into four overapping discussion group:

Student, aul, curio, and experiential ering,

This vapor an integration of the reports, te

pespectives, andthe cones ftom the discussion gam

in infomation techoloies Indust, goverment sEenie, sai edsatonlinsation all have important roles in meeting these calenges Higher

‘elacaton, ia general, has the vole of proving the Profesional preparation forthe next generation of basins leader technical profesional, goverment offcinls, and eiveator wall evel" Engnering

‘education, in parca, willhave aceoval olen out increasingly techoloically-Sased socety, The chacatoe of engines es propa them fo the fall

‘isciplinary naar ofthe problems the wl fie

Report and presentations about enginering

‘dacaton over the past decade document he owing

‘eed for change in the way we do engineering flucaon Sweeping changes in the cater for

‘ngicuring accompanied by signin changes in the challenges offered by the enginesing workplace Ting an urgency othe ned for road change inthe eđuexienfenaineeing gadmse [1213]

There isa growing relzton among engineering fucaty at a new vison for the education of fnglner is evolving, 3 vison based upon the nods

ff enginerng inthe 2st centr The pioropy tha forms this vison eifers from the amen more Fld and mote uniform bass of today's caret

‘This vison weleomes and encourage all motiated and tleated students to Boome engineers These stadnts discover engineering fom the Begining of their academic career apd enjoy a noting vironment throughout their university eduction

“The find exible cura tha ecgnize individu leaing sles and diverse carer paths Guided by dsr and mentors, students choose cectves for tac preparation in support of eduetonal goals and

& sương amBdlm inthe fundamentals of chgneenhg

Trang 13

‘The new paradigm depicts enginerng education a

wood ad forward looking it deseiben an

hgineetng sđucvion tha

(ee «brand fsa edeation that provides the

‘ives and tres need fr englnering

Je prepares artes for enty into carry and Titer sty p both the eninerng sn non

‘enpneving marerplce and

Je develops the masivation, capability, and

KhoNlsôae bọc (Hương ae

Ta focus

on Ue dewlomen of be cuảng sen cnergne

profesional, building the stem’ se esteem and

Spetcie, SE seepine respensiBily Toe the

Instn growth of he sudene The entering

Feely ap techanlogial era a 9 son fot

———

‘The coments ofthe new eurcula ref! his vison,

sHỂ comae icles bro range of comer

fnironmest pote!” and’ social thue,

‘nterationa ome stil owes ad legal and

‘thc! raifcaons of desons Forth von ©

cone esi requires sweeping changes not on

tnginerng eden, but aso in the envio

forthe engicering edesion toe

‘A wow engineering edvestion philosophy in

‘onjnctin wih profound cual chưges dua

‘rovide te eavzaest forthe new cial The

‘nos apeftat meis or ehange fede improved

olagoz, revised comicl conten, hổ pres of

Sonnac asessment and continu apcevmaea

‘Te overall gal of engneeving caicala seal be

fo Goyelop engnering gaianes who am

Pofessonal combos smé Hương lemen

able of succeeding ia the came and Mang

obs, muldseipimey maleh Paths,

fnginecingedustlon mui lợp devon

teehgolopally erste pradunes of nom engine

Although the techie component wil continue tobe

the CS of cam engineering education,

¬ ẻv

gine will be explicly addrexed Emphasis

‘sl be placed onthe eres ped forthe motvaten,

Capabity and Koowze bas for iflng lewing TC an fficenty

enfin an engieeng radiaie as much as any

Capably and shuld be provided by a englaerag

fetueaoa Changes that help eats develop ths

‘api’ for seltlesming and provide faceasng

1 now and highly Nestle depee opons for Sent who intend to practice ngiesragc + tow edocaton! phys fo ude bo eed want a sigaliastchncal component ty

‘he eduction, bu who ined t9 pste nơ

SU hroacer service role witin the anvesigy Community Wwib some eppineering courses lneuded isthe general eduction requis fee onenginering siden sad

‘+ comted efor te understind and respond to fiery in earings a a inpeione

——

We nee processes whereby curicala within exsting eparmens can be renewed more rapidly bt tion, we need roceses for more dramatic ange, enabling cain 19 opt qulekly focical needs, analogous to “exile And agile Imatufzcuriag, techniques nt sẽ me ngợi Imschaisms for quickly assembling new programe

ve ead mechanims for disassembling the when the time lpaeL Se Eete

‘ulure with even broader impact The cagnevnng llge ott snd in the unpueocean,

Insiuting the changes requies a comprchensve sesrtrng of undergraduate eda Ơn ach campus, he eginceing eolege stake the lead i

‘hs canprehnsive change tt benef all of undergaduie dean and reales percpation

By many sectors across ie camps The goal beter prepared mare comptent aad more fly coatbeae graduate fully capable of and confer

HN Meing leming The diversiy of te erie ast be celebrated sd not ju nate,

Trang 14

Engnerrg

‘eemeioay Students New Options

oc Eineerng

‘Components

Figur 1, Flowstream of Retracuied Engineering Edson

“Tis routes new links and new approaches ‘The new system of evar and incentives shut

fear tnd ncemives, assesment and evan

Foray end stent

Faculty Rewards and Incentives

> rcogtits He contin —of aching ‘svsing rserh, and service and

eo dc an appopite response to coautons tại may have received Tes rcopnon sd emanerson nthe pas

‘Tre gusty of

esporsibily of eveyone siden, ely andthe

Campus admasrason However, the faulty pay

{he nading nle = the fot line i the delivery of

‘gn engineering edscaton, Creal Yo the quality

‘Steagleerng edition sa fculy tat diverse

‘ull and profesional expences, tht ie

amnitel to Melo ling and scolar

{hat phe primary empbash on the edeaton of

‘ngiceing professionals In paula, ve mat

evelop zevards and incenes that mote the

‘cmon of al cally an ha sige ch dại

they ze vale collaguer within thi ents, their

'nglntfn, sdsociey

Since the red system 6 the diving fre whieh encourages or dcurages fcuk ivesen’ la he fff neceeary to reform engineering elation, hanging he acl rad yt ira

‘At os insttons fc are ear papers ia he faealy reward sper Thus, much of the push for chước in the tu) hien mus foes on te fact, "Esen tough this may be sii sce many soi faculty were rewarded wader the old reward sat, overvbeiing evidence tel he tegloeering education reward system mst change, Facules tht fil"t0 change will find thei engineering programs Ising behing ober Tse

5

Trang 15

schools wil Beco followers and not faders and

{her pradtes wil ind hey re aa dsadvanage

‘he eagnesing make pce

Aout are ec ageats fr cage io he

‘deride eninering enters, cls ana

Deeomplish his change afooe Tt resus he

Content of th, broad aeademic.communy

{dents acy, and administration) in cooperation

‘ith me, goverment The pols and

‘Shjestives rogue changes i eens sd ncetves

that inlade Head and sweeping iil sep We

rust XAUM cường ngự Wiee dưng tà

.Wefomtuion procs Diverse Faculty wit diverse

lors ring verse soktions Some faculty sil

tk sương leadership eles iting this cual

“den bát the syst of rewards ad eecognion

rut be stvtre to encourage he partiiatin of

road rpresetaton of the faslty commomnty ad

recognize alls valued colagues Rewards and

Teen mus encourage programintic isk king

Inplemertiton snd insinomazaton of @ sew

reward em il requir fog em commonest by

the community

Assessment/Evaluation

‘mew system of roads ad lcemtives rege he

tse of ening smeeetent lebrlgeo and he

Sevelopnen! of sew assessment tednite fr

dent learning a well ae fely teaching, ais,

researc and service Sach ecnes shoul

2 provide Teck To aadars on what ey a

leering ncndine problem formulation, probie|

solani inking, novaive deg, sd

‘roatve Sess

motivate foe sudet earning and provide boner meus for assesment of

teaching adviing, eee, and service

Assesaet dives student leaming The đonlnanl

Sse! method that focuses on cam and

rites drives siesta to mie eng,

nemorizate, canning, and maspation ihn

vow deïod pHÖlets An spmapEee euel

fd incenive spe promotes meaning,

Aetivety involving agents ip making choices and

Setining thei Teaming expeince We need ae

tvaluton and esesmen methodologies fotsed on

Soden lesming in now educxieml cnimnmemx

These methodologies ust suppor the fcuk a

assessing studeat lesning the subsequent uses of

grades, andthe health of engnesng edcaional Programs

vahation and assessment have central oles i the

‘uma felorm proves We nee new processes for assessing both sde Teaming and te effectiveness of ur programs The educational SomMminiy asa whole shoul! underae this work, With cbaboraon beosen fcay, undergrads, rune sadens and nc NSF as shown i Smnhtment lo ty tr By svarding presi Natl Young Investigator aval 0 F's ting Figowus sppecches to understanding the teaching

nd Iaing proces in einen, Diversity

Distr 6 findamental 0 sess enginsring

‘dacaton Dive fly, the ade body snÌ roar emphases become prt of de fe of {npineering otacaron_thsslons inceovves tha promote exempary programs that need evar nd emonaray suceefilreruiment, etoring, at feentin of women and sorties trough the senior teleriand ainkrative ran,

Ineo ao aod sevards and icenives for sxempley progam tht damonsiale mẹ Syelpment of a professionally diverse aes

‘This includes indus, iterstional, or gorenunel xperence ae wells eduestion beyond engineering

‘he ew einering coeum must encourage ull sts fr dives Irmast sere the neds sides entering the undergraduate auctions] oees oa variety of paths nd wit 9 vane of Sls apd becgwounis Sina, she curiclar

‘rare auld sare lel to support the {here caer pty ad goats of tudes ell

2 the meals of 9 silent Boy whose dveriy incorporates ethnic, racia age, ab gene ives

ad a very wide avers ia Tearing ses ahd deste

Free, undergrads eagineringstacton mst, spor ow clases of oes xplaions

[aT snes wha have @ maiatoa To pace]

"` Signcas ehulol com, bạ (ồceel an various homengiteting carer objectives, Ecldig cveen in Kel? education, public poles, mumagetent, flaca services, and) Tai cực

Trang 16

Entinerngedcation must Be accessible 3 wie

spectun of stdeets coming 10 us fom divese

Pass Callges of engineering eed Yo we to

fiske our communes more acceso and

Feponive to sidens eteing the educational

roves rom meny gaewap: needns commenity

follges,engineerng technology programs

‘maton K-12 gatemay, the diplceé indus

fou military workloves, abd other reuig older

siden

Gites to possible approases is given by the

Fouditonenpinecring eduction coalton's song

Tink 'to communiy colleges and the Greeateld

engineering edi coain's Hak community

tied techn edation programs

Development of Students

Mutipie pats foe couy and seeM lo enginecdng

study ae wel sth divers nade of ens

fur progam require eMectve avisng and

Imeuorag processes Enyleeing foul, i

Collaboration with collegues across the campus,

‘as coordinate the etacaton of vr stants bese

igaering topes We mist bp stders inate

‘ther han compartment thei eduaton

Lions leaning fas become an impor concept

evogazing te rapid aivanes in technology over

‘he past 40 yeas and auicpag tt te nalgiel

lage wil be ne les forthe reseesble Re

‘Mom engines experience several major ob changes

dường ther eae Undergrauate engined

Programs can no longer ignore the fic that thy

imo provide all the aecomiry knowledge for

grades o remain competitive inter areas they

Imus educate De hen for i not Jat fo the

fiat job Students mast kaow bow 19 ear, apd

rs be ble to sets thee skis and dations

‘eds This eques they have eonfidene in their

‘hl wo sais he ned fer ilong lenin this

onfidence mast be acconpasied wd otied with =

fin fo the patio of engineering nd Tộc

———

‘Cuil shoud be designed to clive sense of

frofesonalism, The stadt feos te fad of te

Tel; aps ochsge and inact comes to ejay

‘hectoenge of hangs The expenence gained tom

‘het pasage trough the eduaton process bạc

reputed graduates to be conn, 0 move Fora

a to accept the challenge of cange

Design lines reresen one mean of achieving suck

lacleto of Values among, sides Harvey MiGs

College, the orator of design clinics and am exeelet model of te inpleneatatinn, rcety Tasted 2 DUEsponseed workshop to lp sere lean how toffee se this pega device Development of Faculty

acl ae tle models fr students and no le more portant than that of te fcuk menhet Sars, ear an schol

Atbegb indiddml laedly membem have the tukinate responsiblity” for Wis reson rvelopment guidance and assure ae import, ptaps eric Faculty development opporanis

+ &nehgine gaonsile x Ben t ba a] ‘al sdewai aensy rong cimxlig | india saucy neo cngessert]

an ctabortn with engineers ad

"+ xẻ — Stratos among he ly tho redid insenaharers Xem tuong mời Ssiveriysrumres, sad roto of mle Sispiaary aces i pomotion an tere) incerng cay must take ne prsctie roe

In making InÄơy uc Đa vital pet of the duction press, eluding seeking Sve Pastispation in the design, implenentation, ahd Skaton of new curl” This mst ile an fff by engiaceing faulty to work with indy 0

Tp dom expand heir praties for recting student, ay well ar cohaner fel indsty Felionships, an aca Ia Which far weve tamer

nd sstaied progiams of real iteration ae ceded Fuori the enerping aeols of OMe Sides ace fo he met, the fel asa wtole ma Incorpome significant industrial expesence or ample, a DUEpeasored projet at Wytheville Community Caleye is Senne eHghering technology faculty on indus inert tga Insights and sls which will nich thle lssoom

Trang 17

‘The Curriculum: What We Teach

and How We Teach

Suen learn in diferent tons, some wore

emmontable with raion etre, Bt rox more

Feeeotve to ative leaming oprosees that engage

‘her problem solvieg sis and noaveral coun

Abide, “Leaming-byoing” ste orm in ny

‘rofesonal Felde and should be 30 ponent

Sompones: of eaghecing education However,

‘ent engioeig aseuction Speallyeces upon

xxx

‘Suigrmeni and sợnctee camPmwdime for

secement The process of enginesing thcaon

Should change tse more eleive pedagopia

poate and to engage students me elfeesvly he educational enerrize merging

terbnolages,neoing mute computer-based

stoulaton apd omputeded engincerng, ca be

Imporaat conpooerts ie the eduatna process

hg with colsboraive faring, eam proj and

fer tude eae modes We sek ehnges da

provi improved eeming enviroments eladng:

aie Tear ete

Corel re sully defied in teas of gue sad

eeive couses The ‘pzal course deinson

Teeuses op the knowledge to be tases end

regis egies, Most enginesing couse

Sse ineeesible to Rơnegheeing sudo

CCaiela for the 2st centr should topesent

hose eduction, volving matey of nos set

fengeeetng findement, prpmrdin Rư long Tearing and exit to my pusitof nial

stat gals pd asa

Ici impose o define an enpincaing cuislen

plicable everynbore inthe nation Each schoo!

Sets oa consent and we boul expt and

plan divest cel an progras,

Assesment and evaluation a the setonl proces

tue cota foe exposing problem and emblng,

feos! inrovementTratonel "ase

teheds sich a5 sens surveys of course gual,

‘ereditaton racsses, ahd Uo mat densmd for

[atts shold be augmeted with new approche,

‘The euteat examination, co sponsored By ingsty

tnd NSF's DUE and BEC dlusions, of Accretion Boaud foe Engiscring and Tecnology (ABET) rei, pocestes and pence sina Re ắc for ABET in the assesment and ealstion of ngicering education,

gine colleges ust assume new responsibilty for promoting tecaoloieal Tracy throughout te waedy, For exgieers and noneineers ake, testooogcl Iiercy means more fan segison of email skis and knowedae, more “nat sự, tots” Walso means understanding end appreveing

‘eealogy’s evolution overtime, an trhrongy3

‘all, seil, stories econoni, poll, lal

‘snl envioumeetal concep TRE fate of ar RAokedy tecnologia! soicy depends on renter Trebnelogia lien

Eainerng courses within the enginesring dpe beoeft sonseeical majors, analogous 10 the ewes egiserig students receive fromm ther experiences thin te cole of the Werle onmaniy, Enginering faculty sboul aie Feaersip ols in integrating cucu elements across dcp, ieluling may, the pial ahd Social selene, and he humaniis, tober seve the reeds student

Drexel Universiy’sEobatoet Engneeing esis Experience programy ininted with DUE spon, provides an example fan integrated hie cuter appreach a lower division Insaco,

“The program has proven so poplar hats ethos have heen cxpunded 19 encompass he ente Freshman cas an serve a the bass ofthe Gateway nuiewig education cosion,

[A DUE sponsored laboratory iprovement projects Wewen Kemudy Unheniy maides mde contttual tag experience, AB par of a Slomediel expieering cure, stents a

‘mewsring ccrupatonalexposre to chemical sd noel Seo pot only im studeat wood working, {ad cheney abs, uta acl afaetrng psa

‘luoagh such methods sodents om immediiehy

sp the imponance of thle tas to vel word tgplatene

Implementation Auicgaing the dhllenges of tbe 2Ist eat, Undergraduate edeion in pummnhlp wih dnm, mist prepare ade nai ony of Profesional eosmunies, bat of al seers in an Sneeasiely tckacogial society Grados te

sd wil be incovingb, called up tole nt

Trang 18

nly echnical knowlege, ba communion kil,

‘stage and final capable, awareness of

foci mpiations, and tis! jodpmeat This

‘eat of skis i needed by gradtes who wil

‘come effective leaders in sens such ss advanced

‘anufitring, mates aad processing,

Yi9Eelnnloyy, inữesrd<tre enkancoment, bath

`

The engineering eduction communiyy & well

asoned to foster the breadth expected of

rates Brooly defied, dhe commun inlades

ot only engineering and enginurngtecholoey

faery members, but aso instal profesionls

who supervise interns and cooperative eduction

dnt as well ete sudets henseves active

Tartan, each responsible for is or her own

esto In ao, this ommniy neracts with

Tnsvueiooal desigess familar wih erating

avatcod lecolopes Mạn eieins paaapogie

systems, academic sipport pesnnel who povie

Corchment and eahinsement oppomnites 9

Students and aeaemo counselors and advisers who

provide sudnts wis Infrmation on cater opin

nd reqsred earsework Tos in arder to prepare

sradoate or te chaleng© ofthe 21st century,

{he eugisering education comunity must

+, Netocure cơm: tạ m=uức integration of|

cantexual experience, apreiaton for De

fomplestis of pyscal devices asd structures,

trod tention ‘0 learing envionment, sd

recognition of tác đing teckgrounds and

(ater gous students: ab

1+ Develop fel sad organzaonal structures

beter prepare to mplement revised circu

‘nd laboratories and to aes he brood ange

tt factort which fluence tude ern

Redesigned eaginering educational systems shoul

beter mes the seeds ot only of engters, but a:

the age numberof students who wil use their

backgromds in engineering and technology 10

serve them ia ther fleas tee ctizens,

+ fine Medes leds, aetdeme™ and

overeat

1 Tine teachers of mathemati, scence and

‘eetnology, lang tase tthe eeneuy

level as

“fire sient and mathematicians

We tative thse objeives ean be sucesflly

schioved ough a ners systens approach 1

‘he design, implementation, and evahution of undergraduate engineering ei, The abetives

‘othe approach are o: eliminate bers ease by Apurmenaloursves, achieve veteal and hizo iegraion within cull (ớt Ifepnđien beBtsea cuinsgtng and ther techie snd nore! fils ad promote integration of Alverse ses of aden.” Consequently tis reques foopension among fly wibin a piven fagneeing_ depart and faulty i her neering deparmens;siense and maDensie,

‘management scene, humaties; a) and 02a

‘iene Expected rrals of these clloboraions are cảeemuinnl of sicesfl teaching abd lamin st

‘he undewraduae level imovalve oưieler frameworks, comprebeashe fecly develope seihlie 10 faite implemenition of the new Cricla, and eancod itegrtve and conta Tabratay activites

‘The imerdscipinry nae of sueh ab inept systems approach would be ceal an parla fallenging and would require developmen by a ulidseplinay project teen s4 xương mot

‘eos aeademic unis Exanples that illest some Sppoches might clude developmen, inplenenation and evaluation af

2 omplete euriclum that inerates

‘opics fom scence, utente, imaragemet, Eels, socal seehee and Yanaaiie suổ bơm lồ aro spies

of engineering, created and Hạ hy

‘uldiseptnnry ams, Sa new delivery sytem which nepaes the ffetve se of technology in the

‘crclum fo masinze acess fo stdets fom underepresered groups, wad 10 sccommedae varity of backround, leening syle nd ts; = casters based cucu ied for Seales planing to pune exeeropone Sch as meine, nw, osines, and Kh level teaching vel 5 "engibeering an

‘ecology appreciation” couse sequences foc owenginering sues, neat science and memes major an

2 milled engineering core and an ineyatd capstone design experience wide fanive patepation by all deporments Wihina college oFengncering

Trang 19

close cooperation of fcay in engineering with

Teculy ie er sep iching,

example, mathemati, since, manage!

‘nthe humanities as a lise proc

tần withmuldscipiay represetason

thang te co pinch avestigatn,

4+ mechan neease the diversity of sens

`

-

4+ development oF ineperonl skis such as ` and senshiviy to

‘roles consiertons Gupta on developing student? capsbity to

Team on heir

development sad implemention of ne

cdfenive namusimal nehol,

development of instuciona tras suchas

textbooks, coure motley ab oma,

Sottnre and multimedia presentations

‘+ ap esshoton component with Bott Tommie

fm summative elements to dermine how

elasl he project mecing te smH ad

The cos elerveness of he cumonhan:

‘© Sisemiation tht fills widespread

capability and sneeases aden of the

proaches and products developed nthe

Addonally,proecs would he expeted to have

Several fh lowing elements

‘+ sxemphasis op oral and writen communications

Skills erated souphoat th easel

‘+a focus om projects, experema ann, end Scovencorented ara eines to

fcvelop suet capably t solve il posed sd

bpenended problems

1+ coopeeiverelionstipe with dhs involves Saude, fey an incl procs

commit of ares

"`

sree (For thse iosttions What

fpograms) 16 improve adoption and

implementation of effecive approaches to

‘eacing a ering:

4 nison “of new instructional and sting paratipns tha opize efficent and effective

‘he of nsutiogl sal abd tcl

+ Texiity to enable sadents prepare for caters in varety of elds, losing meine

law, hoses and tating, as wll ay

nine

4+ eration sương facly from education, Seles, mathematics apd caganetig in 3

cooperative soiy to enbae KeLt ince

trepsmim;

© Sstong component of itematonl education

1 comprbensve elements to inode ngierng and technology to sidnts Hos rsstchncal majors, aswell a 10 sade

‘naocng in seince and mathemati

——

References

| geri EReeslot gui Price i the United Stas, Foundations of ur Techn conan

“ao, Code onthe Eueson 08 Uszaton

of the Engineer, National Resear Couac, Washington DC 1985

2 Bucaton for the Momacarng World of

‘he Fanoe, Natopal Acaleny of Engineering, [Nasional Academy Pres, Washington, DC 1985

3 Qualny of Ergicerng Edestion Fal Report of the Quay oF Fagneeing EAelon Proje Amerian (Seeey for Enpncenng esto, September 1985,

4 The National Action Agenda _for Engincring Education, Repo of ap ASEE Tas Fore Ameccan Soci) fe Engnerog Eicon, Washingin DC, November, 1987

Trang 20

1 Feeat om the Future: A National Action

Pion for Carer Long E4eaion for #ngmeem,

Report ofthe Commitee on Carer-Long Edseaon

for Engineers Nation Academy of Eaginerng,

Washigton, DC 1988,

S.—_Roport om the Naor Sionce Foundation

Disipibury Workshops on Unierradnats

Econ Workshop on Engicsring poses 51-5,

‘api 199,

9, New Changes ix Etcoing Enginers

Report of «Confrence resered by tnos isa

oF Tecnology, Jor 1-11 199)

10, Major lsu ty Engisoring Eduction, 8

working paper of the Board ot Engng

cation, National Research Cosi, Wsbiglo,

DG, August, 1985,

Wort Report 4 Worksop bell a Washington,

DC, Feininry 2425, 198 American Society fr ngineing Eaton, Oca 1994

Reman: Unversty of Colorado Eryibeerne Cetenil Convocation, October 11993

13, Bnghwers: The Navigators for a Swowimale Fade, George E Brow Jc Representative Congres om Califor, Remks

st Nato! Academy of Engineering Ssmposiy 29 Now Dirstins in Science and” Technoloss,

‘Wasagton, DC, October 7, 1903

Trang 21

RESTRUCTURING ENGINEERING EDUCATION:

'ASYSTEMS APPROACH JUNE 63, 1998

‘Wyadham Bristol Hotel Washington, DC AGENDA Monday June th

‘Asoiate Dean of Engineering

(Georgia nite of Teehlogy

Masschusets Insite of Technology

(Q&A and Genera Diseusion

troduction of Working Group Chairs and Members

‘Summary and Synthesis of Background Information Previously Distributed by Workshop Rapporteur:

‘Dr Edward Est

Alig Signal Profesor of Enginesrng

Univesity of Sout Catina

“Tuesday, June 7th

.00-1030AAM

Keynote: Lesions from

‘Dr Shiv Kapoor

Directo, Manufictring Engineering Program

‘Universi of lio - Urbana

lersciplinary Approaches to Manfactring

(Q&A and General Discusion or Implications for Other Interdsipliary Challenges

Keynote: taterdscipinary Challenges ln the National laformation lfrastrctare

Dr Rober Jenowiak

Executive Director

Tmtermatonal Engineering Consorium

Trang 22

General Discussion

Gai

Focus: Engineers and Teacker Preparation

[re Rober, Watson

QA and Genera Diseasion

oots: Enginering Education

Merman Sesto = Disease of Key lies

(Warow Breck Rove)

Working Group ‘Breakout Rooms

Cnet Leaning Potomac Tt

‘Breakout Groups (net in inary groups, We ey poi)

‘sate Diet, SEHR

(Q8A and General Disusion

Trang 23

‘Wodesday dune Rh

Working Group: Breakout Room:

$00 10:00 AM Discssons on Key Ise (Cont)

renkout Gromps et in sesonday ous or erss-corsaion ite) 100-1030 AM BREAK

Breakout Groups (ies in primary "`

Nhan LUNCH (Poonie L& Hị

.608- 3:30 PM Prdiminary Repors ram Priem Groups

230-530 PM Breakout Groups meetin primary poops: wre)

_Asisant Decor, NSEENG

(Q8A and General Dsusion

— eM

Final Report rom Primary Groups, Weap-sp, Summary, Adjoursment 1

Trang 24

APPENDIX B: INTERPRETIVE SUMMARY OF KEYNOTE

Dr Mark Wrighton, Provost, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Speaking within the contest of amerous activites undereay athe Masachuseas Insite of Techology (MIT),

Dr Wrighons adds centered on thee major theme:

1 The growing importance ofintrdispiar and itrdeprtnental collaboration

2 The viliy and synergy which re fom saden-aculy iatrction and the linkage of education wit research and

3, The ncening role of tecology in addesng societal ns, particulary in envionment aes

Dr Shiv Kapoor, Director, Manufacturing Engineering Program,

University of Ilinois at Urbana-Champaign

Dr Kapoor decribed the Manicuring Education Program (MEP) at the Univesity of in at Ub (Champaign (UIUC) wbich inks education, research and ecology ansfer The program haste objectives

‘which relevant tothe effort resrctringenginerngedestion

‘rough two sponsored eeuch center, andthe development af two collegeewie undergradate orion

Dr Robert Janowiak, Executive Director, International Engineering Consortium

Dr Janowik focused onthe similares and difeencs in the development ofthe national highway system andthe

‘on-going development of he ations! information infaructre (Nl) by ooking such sues a policy, network ratte, standards, sopping industries, funding, customer equipment, cusomer interfaces, ser pricing, and regulon He nod several ra ifrenes in te two efor Principal among these i that the path for

‘ces developmen! of he NI i ot eta, and as ecologies evolve changes deton wil be teal © cose The three determinants of succexs will be ese f wc, ubiquity, and value doi wih soc, conoric ad politcal dimensions

Trang 25

‘Mr Samuel Florman, Viee President, Kreisler Borg Florman Construction

Me Flema adres hs remarks tothe nation’s civil infrastructure, He dew 2 contrast between ininsnuchre development methods of te 1940's and 1980s and those of tds Those which could be imposed by excetve Fiat thve which souire building cooperative oaks of repulse, resets, lneren rot, palin, tnd

‘echnical poesia Modem engineers must necessary be apt at ercscipinay challenges, Te specials

Dd tht sngincuringpotesonls mit develop sks whieh wee not previously rete inching encelet

‘takmuaicatoe skills asd Uoowedge oF the humanities However, he cauioned da te technical cove of

‘cinering cannot be Sighted He uso obured tht tere ean be bo ingle “best” approach that the suength of

‘he American educational syste ies ints diversi

‘eon is eeted i Bee programs: the Statewide Stem lattes, de Ua Sssemic aiatves, and

ir, Wilms assed thatthe undergratfovel hoe sina ned toes fundamental problems whi inhib he stequtepreparsion af individuals forthe completes of modem le and wark He ced lak af recogon ofthe diverse backarounds an ever aprons of undergrad student x well yan tab to ont to promot the new was of eaming beng tite the pe-olege level a shorting ofthe cent

‘atom of undergradune education He sated tht we anno longer ae stages ot thesis of ecational aston; we must arth ston othe ees of tues

Dr, Willams sdvocited the wae of comprehensive efor, at svar of inetitons, 10 addres pediment to providing the acdemic environments needed for fonomon’s skilst orker and rponsle chizen Hệ Fscoeimended tht such els adress the nate of the student-teacher arco, the comple amine

‘virocmen, sb the elevanee ofthe cuiculum othe ul and inrduiplinay challenges of modo sao:

Dr Joseph Bordogna, Assistant Director, Direstorate for Engineering,

‘National Science Foundation

Dr Berdogna sethed the varity f intemal and exeeat presures which are reshaping the engineering carpi These pressres ex io tain snd nlemtionn contexts He provided in overicw of ever for

‘imizational charge i ede since, engineering and tehnolgy education an eseweh entes The eles

‘thee drivers were lsated by discussion of the Nena Sience snd Tesinolgy Caunel (NSTC) Commitee

fn Civilian Indust Technology adit roprans an the Manoichring Infasrtre andthe NSF ivi lnFasmetrs Sydens fanevf

Dc Bardopn culiel the inputs to innovation and weak cretion incladng sence, public poly, technology, sconemics, aid engineering Ne then oulined stage hemes for sewlere im ồc teengrðmt cohvy, Thec incidental integration organizational itgraton, tvesten (9 people, oezaizaonal apy, and scoouabiliy: Give these eases and these osarvod ht bole Baealauesteenglogeting elation

‘mut tulance cnginerag since aad engheeing pacice He poled now padi for cginseing

‘tucaon which ino eatin es ofthe or, bt tem of tlancing compleiy and simpy, cera and pein, poblen formation snd problem solving, integration ad analysis teaching and esearch, aswel a independence snd teamwork Dr Bordoga concluded by eheeving Đá academe’ bond isan remiss the cretion of enhanced socal welfre hough the ransermtion of resources fives in ecaion sd reve Poduce mowed,

6

Trang 26

PPENDIX

Dr Ashok Agawal

Deparmeat of Enginecing and Technology

St Louis at Floreat Valley,

(hai, Edicaton Accreditation Commision

‘American Innate of Chemical Engineers

“Amerian Society for Engineering Ecaton Deparment of Eleecal and Computer Systems Engineering

RenselearPlyectne Instat

Ms Sarah 6, Christine Graduate Stent Jos Hopkins Univesity

Me Zairaio Caller

‘Undergraduate Student Morgan State Univers

Dr Patrica D, Daniels [Serte, Stent Group]

Associate Dean of Engineering and Science Seale Universi

Dr Eugene DeLoaeh

‘tonal Research Councis Board of Engineering Edvation;

ean of Eginering Morgan State University

"Ngiena Reeweh Comei

‘Board af Engiecing Pdoedio Deparaneat of Elecbical and Computer Engineering Univesity of Wisconsin - Madison

Dr Richard Devon (Chai, Engnerng and Publi Policy Division

“Amerian Society for Enginsing Education;

‘General Engineering Department

‘Univesity of Penasy ania cat Eman

Principal nvestigtor, Foundation Colton; Exectve Associate Dean of Enginesing

‘Tess ABM University

De Edward W Ernst {Cenfrene Reppoe]

‘Ali Signal Professor of Engineering Univesity of Sout Carolia

Trang 27

Dr Kaen Fir

[Serte, Experientia Contexal Learn Group}

Departneat of Mechanial Engncerag

Unive of Albums

Dr Bl Fromm

Praia investigator, Gateway Coalition,

Vice Prove fr Research and Gradua Sees

Dretl University

Dr Lawreace Galo

[Cla Experenal Contextual Learning Group]

Deparment of Engineering Fundamental and

Malin pinay Desir

tows State Univers

Dr Wayne Hager

ean, Stool of EngieorngTeeology and

Commonwets Engineering

Pennylvania Ste Univer Sytem

Ms Rae Ann Haliscom

Depart of Enviromental Equpment

Babeodk and Wileos

Dr dames Hari

[Seribe,Curela Grow

Departnent of Eletiel Engiering

Calton Polytech State University San Lai

Onispe

De Mark Henderson

racial investi, Holistic Approach for

Preparing Shdets to Lair and Lead

TRP Cơaiden,

CIM Systems Reseach Centr

chanh Sẽ inenlty

Dr, ivi Heerckson

[chai Curicla Group}

‘Aselte Dam sf EngneEdnE

[Clas, Sudee Green)

atari Science aa Engineering Deparment

‘Asoeite Dass of Eapnering (Georgia nati of Technology

Me Randy Massenale Miso Capron

Dr Roy Matson

‘ice President of cami Ais (RET)

‘ator Techologel University,

Ms Kity MeGorry

‘Undergruae Stent Unive of Colerao- Boulder

Dr Joa MeMastr CœPI Cunkelam Development inttve Arian Society of Mechanica! Engineers: Principal Engncr,Asodynamics Engineering Boeing Commerc Alplate Company Carolyn Meyers

[conference Chai)

‘Aseiate Desn of Eaginering Georgia tse of Technology

Dr Emil Mendoza Presiden

(alate Technolgies

Trang 28

De George Malloland

rnc! Ivesigtor, Masuthctring Eginerng

eeation Cosson, TRP Coalition,

Chấp Depwtntet of Meebasiel Eagneefng

‘New Mesto State University

Dr Richard D'Onofrio

President

Frankl neue of Boson

Dr Phllp Oenabd

Educational Afr Commitee

Society of Maucturing Engst

Deparment of Mecha! Eagaceng

‘Academic Destor, Gree Calton

Unierhy of Del, Mery

rail lavestigatr, The Realization Coaton

Depart of Mecha Engineering

Dr Gera Volant Deparment of Industral Eginerng& formalin Sysems

‘Newthesstem Univers

Dr Howard Vooris Departmen of Prod Easton

“bản Yhke Manuicnrng Conpany

De Philip Wonka (Chae, Feculty Group]

"amwdnetofFielmhan Enginsring Purdne University

De Hay West Chair, Carel Development Commitee CSEL Coslten,

Deperzen of Mechankal Engnering Masschanets isu of Technology Richard Wiliams

Pri avai, Souter Cabfomia

“TRP Coden

Dea of Engineering

‘Clifoia Sate Uses, Long Beach

Dr JohaF, Wood Poca Investigator, Apprenticeship Oriented ation snd Extension Training TRP Coan Depertnet of Mechanial Eegneci,

Untveity of New Mexico

Dr James Yao (Chai, Edvestina Task Farce

“Amerian Society of Chil Engineers;

‘Deputmeat of Cl Engiceing Terie A&M Univer UESIS:

LAcing PxendiveDiedr

‘Bardon Eaginering Buran

————

Ms Anm-Legh Speicher

‘Manager of Pui Policy and Information

‘Armor Society for Enginering Edution

Dr David Rds Deparment of Mechanical Eninering Unboenig ef Quensland

Besbane, Australis

19

Trang 29

charge:

‘Oar focus during this workshop i to redefine the casclar content (nln laboratories) of an engineering

‘duction inorder to beter prepare our student o respond to new challenges in an increasingly interdependent

‘lobe society Specialy, he inten to dese vercl and horizontal integration within engineering, between fneincring nd other echnial and notches and with espetftgrton of verse es of dents Esplicly dered outcomes ae model circle fameworks, model fist development actives 1 fate Instruction the now curiula, nd model imegratv and contextual laboratory activites

oats

LAmiculae the wehical, economic, poliieal, and social challenges inherent in inerdsiplinay issues of

‘mediate relevance wo the eaglacrig profession This will be dane by way of example With two eral inertia iene

ha

‘Re ta mca rr an gs, ng 2 Define the desited characterises of enibeering professionals who can ass these infailsues (what ee)

ey can do, wha sills hey possess et)

3 Define needed linkages among englnceing disciplines and beeen engineering and oer fll in oder wo achieve the desied characteris,

4 Define the edestioal srctresnecessiry to achieve the desired personal characteristics and disciplinary linkages,

5 Ident impediments to achieving dese disipliuy liskages and educational stuctes, and

6 Define appropri roles and required ston for NSF, profesional seit, academic instutons, and ober stakeholders fo overcome the ienifed impediment to achieve necessary disciplinary linkages and edcationsl

Crasseting Iss: | How do we promote ion eaing?

2 How can we improve the public avarnessof engineering (Le outeachto general publ, mdi, K-12 eile, pret?

5 How can we change he insttional reward sytem (for bot faculty and students)?

{How can we provice evalustion ad dissemination pth?

‘5 Whats he role of educational technologies and metodologis?

1 Which students engineering education meant to serve?

How do we croste curricula which con adiear th needs of sdets wih mony different carer paths, «8, rang ngheen,seleuli Ji tacÖem social scents an planer, generalizes?

ow can we kop the issues of qty an access to he fore? Can we bud int te program safeguard agains the

‘women and minority ius raceing onl ip serie?

How do we keep dors open between elnial education ad eninering seams, incl showing ladeship in the K-12 commis fom which ow students emerge?

2 How do we ensure tha new curiula best meet the evalving needs ofthe students Weare serving?

Trang 30

‘hat enginceing sills and atribaes wl sudo (majors and nomajors) who ae Infuened by ow programs reed 10 tate on pare roles sch prvting engineers, scifi, teachers, socal sells and plamer,

‘teens, leader of mdr and government, eters tchnalogy police?

Can we clarify theres we expect ow majors o ply in society? Wha about srudems who emerge from any now Join programs we might rete? Based on tex claifctions, what changes mas ocar win "Apartment

‘oferings and what Inks are sought in roader undergraduate curricula?

Wit ou nw curva prepare our sds to intgrte technical, cient poltical ethical, economic and social and omironmental dimensions?

Do degree programs within waitonal departmental boundaries adequately meet the profesional neds of our

‘sndeny, or shold we Be thing ore tan-deparmental dears options?

‘What mechaniams can we devs to ena th the new cried scontonant withthe profesional reat dat

ow tds wl be facing rapids changing econ?

How do we adress the meds of ole, returning ond portstine sudo, and wha our role lon earning? Hom wll our nw crea be nacre to accommodete ders in leaning sles, xporienceandapiration? ory of ur sade face the probably of employment na contracting economy Can weno as omg as we are forging 0 dramaialy new edacaional process, mate sure that wo also adress finding new mechanism for ‘mating engincering ahcation affordable fo roader petra of okey? What ind of mechanioms for evan how wll wear dingo alo the ave can wept in place at pat of the program's nin rte

2 Students are potently powerfl players in the process of education transformation, rather than merely its Benfcares How do we structure the proces as to most effectively collaborate with thers, oar most

Can we desig the transformation process to more atively He othe matation or service tha 0 may of our

‘dons exhibit, Lean edacatonl service component integrated no he cars?

What wl be th roles of stds incre development and teaching in th ow programs?

How dows reward students for involvement in edcaiona change?

What roles ought student soit 6 SWE, NSBE oe, playin the change proces?

Can ween that tude il play cnr role in evaluation and assessment?

1 Who arlshould be our faculty?

hot are the characteris of a deal fac ata whol), how dows hs Afr from the curtent sation? Wha {ste appropriate balance wihin fc (parttime, dnc, retired par fcal)?

What character shold india faculty members have?

2 How do we develop our Healy?

a

Trang 31

How do we best prepare faulty?

What ins of experience should nda rte fecal a whole hae?

How do we erate ecrament ad retention of minorities, women, and persons with ables?

How should the hiring process change?

‘hot would be an idea fac reward srctre? Doss include tere? How doc i difer from the carent truce? How do we meanretealation faculty work (aching research scholarship, serie, quali, productivity, effetnvencs)? Hove dee one compared fly working diferent domain? [Dua adr a Industry do not work] Blow do we et ful 0 change and "buy mo" @ ew reward siactare, Wha the lnonctrol oftexbook and coursenare developmen!”

Hay do we bs edcaterai/prepare fue fal? And hoe do we retrain extn fculy? [Consideration must

‘he gon to restrch, procical enginccrng, tachinglaring, menorinpadvng.) What the role of ualureul?

How do we lp fc halance conflicting ine demands? (Conideration mat be siento personal and fm preseures in adition 1 road demand from erlingfreverciơvie] Hov do we el 1 negate vr

3 ow do we anit or faculty in thee development of curricala?

Foc re often son athe mojorimpscmon to change Ih ran if, wha shouldbe done?

How do we best maintain and improve the qual of srction incorporating deliver methods ater ơn le

‘and learning systems which work?

ow do we diseminate est proctices incredible fora (which coun tard prometion) whe protecting nella How do we iersse foci sens and adpation ovens dent divest?

| How do we accommodate ferences in the stidents me serve?

How do we develop curcala that accommodate diversity of larg ses, Backgrounds, and outcomes incu row engineers and nontraditional sudo)?

How do we adequately aes admission of rar sunt (nhding ecology vaca, tcc, bral tas aden ening stuns eí)”

ha now delivery methods, and adecationa wchnlopes should be roduc andor expanded

2 How do we accommodate differences in our students profesional and personal interests, aspirations, and future neievements?

How do we develop curcua that accommodate tal and polenta carcer paths of our graduate (including Profesional engineers managers, etreprenear, hic leaders, ec)

2

Trang 32

How can we ensure hamaitic brea?

How can we ensure appropriate conierton ofthe eects of enginseed systems on emironmentl, econo, {octal ond plial tem?

How can ws ensre good communication, eration and amor sie?

ow cane ensure iterdseplinay flor learning sis?

How can we reduce the required, exiting content to reali level acommedaing lily, appropriate work Toad andar profesional degre?

How cane evaluate the effective ofthe enive criclun?

How can we best rans arial experince?

What are eppropie sacar to achieve our goal (nluding sacar lo promote emerging, inerdciplinary

“TT EiteriniiCimisialLanig——

1 How do we provide stadents withthe broader (mulisipiary, internationale) contexts within which {0 view tradeoffs (économie, scio-homanistic, energy, materials, etc) in the design, development, and Implementation of enincering systems?

Cam we ada K-12 bmovations (collaborative learning hands-on ec)?

How dows isaeate oclecox ng (meiulng waste and dso)?

What the prope ee of wnersiy-mdastry eration (eluding sade work experiences, distance edwaton ey?

What are he desired nr-rlationshps among foul, stdets, and erica?

What ol of chological appreciation appropri for nm-majors?

sig, development, and implementation processes for engineering

What vet of linkage appropriate bene technical and managerial six?

How do we promote close tinkage of engineering design and reatzationproeses?

How do we develop lie and ile programs?

How do we Incorporate "el worl” scenarios and earning?

oe owe tain ou stunts operate in enreprncilemionments?

How do we best develop hands-on proectoriemed lasses

What ithe role of wndergract research?

2B

Trang 33

APPENDIX E: BACK‘ ND DOCUMENTS

‘Twenty-six documents slevan 10 engaceriog edueaon, manufacturing, and the environment were

‘reviewed by Dr Edward W Eras wakshop rapporteur, inorder provide an overview of tpi sea for trrkshopparcpans What follows sa chronoogial bibliography, an analysis and synthesis of the varios Socaments, and annouted summaries ofthe document inthe iblowapy

2 BrginceringEdction and Practice i the United Ses, Foundations of our Teco Econom Future

‘Commies onthe Education and Ulan ofthe Engineer, National Research Cone, Washington, DC 1985,

3 _Bngincoring Undergraduate Edecation, Commitee onthe Education and Uilaation ofthe Enger,

‘Ntloral Resereh Coane, Washington, DC 1986

4 _BrgincorngTelnology Education, Commitee onthe Eaucation and Uilization ofthe Engineer, National Research Couel, Watlington, DC 1986

5 QualorofEnginerngEcaton Fil Report ofthe Quality of Eginering Beato Projet, American

‘Society fr Engineering Education, Washington, DC Sepember, 1986

6 The National Action Agenda for Engineering Education Report of n ASEE Task Force Amin Society {or Engineering Eduction, Washington, DC, November, 1987

1 Feces onthe Faure: 4 Nainal Aton Plan for Career Lang Education or Engineers, Report ofthe (Comsinee on CarersLong Eduction for Engets, Naoal Academy of Eapinering, Washington,DC 1988

8 Report onthe National Sconce Foundation Diseiplinary Workshops on Undergraduate Eaheation, Workshop en Engicerig pages 3-88, National Scence Foundation, Wathaglon, DC Apel, 1989

9, Scholarship Reconsidered Priorities ofthe Profssriate mest Boyer, The Camegie Foundation fo the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton University ress, 1990

10 New Challenges in Educating Bre, Repor of «Confrence presented by tino Institute of

“Technology ta cooperation withthe Associaton of Independent Techologial Univesies and the National Science Foundation, fne 10-1, 199, Chicago, 1 199,

Creating ou Common Furr, Fak G Spit ntemations Enginering Consort, Chisago, tinal, Sepemter29, 1981

12 America's Academic Future A Report ofthe Presiden Young Imestigator Colloquium on U.S

Enginerng, Mathematics and Scone Edweation forthe Year 2010 and Beyond, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC Janay, 192,

13 Chil Infasracare tem Research, Repr of Workshop bed by National Science Foundation, Washington, DC Api 15,1992

14, “Engineing Education: Innovation Though neraton’, Joseph Bodog, El Fromm, Edward Ems oul of Ergincering Education, Saar 1983, pages 38

Trang 34

15, Palle Instractare Resor, A Pub nrarctveResnarch And fr the Social, kwiral ad Economie Since, Rept 4 Worksop bald bythe National Ssanse Foundation, Waskingson, DC, Ape 21-25,

21, Soca, Wasingon, DC nginsering a Sutanable Fue, Av AAES Policy Satement, AntercanAssociion of Enginesing

22 "Stdying forthe Fare: Life-Long Leming n Eps, the US and apn”, Leena Ot, ASE Pra, October 193, Page 2-29,

3ã “Re-enpinerng Engineering Education”, W.M.Spurgua in Proceedings of the 28 Area! From Ie Eduation Confrence old November 69 bn Washigton De LanrenceP Grayson, Ei, Instat of lee)

sn Flere Engineers, IEEE Catalog Naber 93CH33738,Pocatanay, Nb,

2A “Taking the Leas, Wined M Philp, ASE Prim, December 1995, Page 82

25, Major lunes Balncoring Bacto, A woking pape the National Research Couns Bord oo Eneinering Eatin, Washagton, DC 1085

26, Ergincerng Ett na Changing World » workshop held by te Americas Society for Erato cation, Febuary 24-25, 199, [Foal rept leased Orbe 1994]

Ngày đăng: 24/03/2014, 00:20