Puget Sound Clean Cars Stormwater Partnership Working Group MeetingKen Zarker, Washington State Department of Ecology Tom Lewandowski, Gradient Gary Pollak, SAE International Friday Apri
Trang 1Puget Sound Clean Cars Stormwater Partnership Working Group Meeting
Ken Zarker, Washington State Department of Ecology
Tom Lewandowski, Gradient Gary Pollak, SAE International
Friday April 28, 2017
Trang 2• Introductions, Overview and Project Organization
Tom Lewandowski, Gradient
• Background
Ken Zarker, Ecology
• Stormwater Impacts and Possible Solutions
Jen McIntyre, Washington State University
• Overview of Automotive Drips/Leaks
Gary Pollak, SAE International
• Project Deliverables
Tom Lewandowski, Gradient
• Open Discussion
• Stakeholder Questions & Open Comments
• Next Steps and Follow Up
Web Meeting Agenda
Trang 3Copyright Gradient 2017
• Project Goal: identify technologies and approaches to
reduce stormwater impacts associated with automotive
vehicle fluid leaks in the State of Washington
Fluid leaks only, not focusing on other emissions (e.g brake dust, refrigerants, exhaust components)
Research focus, not proposing policy or regulation
• Project Strategy: work with a diverse panel of
understand current technologies
identify possible new practices/technologies
identify drivers and barriers addressing the issue
consider safer fluid product alternatives
Project Overview
Trang 4• Ecology, Gradient, and SAE
• Identify and recruit experts for the working group and stakeholder advisory group
• Coordinate meetings and communications among the groups, and
• Complete the final research report based on the findings of the Working Group and Stakeholder Group
Project Organization: Operations Team
Trang 5Copyright Gradient 2017
Operations Team Organization Chart
Contact Name Affiliation Project Leads Ken Zarker Ecology
Project Support Staff Dave Mayfield Gradient
Jeffrey Gutschmidt Ecology
Trang 6• Small group of reps from government, academia, NGOs and
automotive-related businesses, and chaired by Ken Zarker (WA Ecology)
Attend quarterly web-meetings throughout the project
Function as a sounding board for ideas and information gathered
Identify sources of technical information (documents, people)
Potentially help in information gathering (e.g., conversations with other experts)
Review and potentially write small sections of the final report
Receive quarterly newsletters and email communications
Project Organization: Working Group
Trang 7Copyright Gradient 2017
Working Group Organization Chart
Area of Expertise Contact Name Affiliation
Academic/Research Ed Kolodziej University of Washington - Tacoma
Michael Smith Clover Park Technical College
Jen McIntyre Washington State University
Automotive design,
manufacturing,
maintenance and
repair
Sheila Andrews/Tom Tucker Auto Care Association
Marcel Halberstadt Independent consultant; SAE Laurie Holmes Motor & Equipment Manufacturers
Association (MEMA)
Government Bill Malatinsky Seattle Public Utilities
Trang 8Stakeholder Group Organization Chart
Area of Expertise Affiliation Academic/Research Washington Stormwater Center - WSU
Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association (MEMA) Volkswagen
Automotive Service Association Northwest Auto Alliance
Government City of Kirkland
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Northwest Green Chemistry
NW Pollution Prevention Resource Center California Stormwater Quality Association
Trang 9Copyright Gradient 2017
• All meetings will be web-based
• Goal is to listen to everyone, gather all relevant information
We are interested in data not personal views
All opinions are valuable, particularly if delivered respectfully
• Active participation in discussions is essential
• Decisions (which will be limited) are consensus based
• Working group members will be able to speak, visitors will have to type questions in the chat box
We may use raised hand function or messaging during discussions depending on how things progress
Chair (Ken Zarker) will direct the discussions
• Try to limit jargon to the extent possible
Working Group Meeting Ground Rules
Trang 10Stakeholder Engagement & Collaboration
• Lead through a Consensus-based approach
• Ecology values your professional input so that we benefit from your knowledge
• All stakeholder input is valued
• Ecology is responsible for the final deliverables under the EPA grant
• Who does What by When and how we Follow up so that assignments don’t fall through the cracks
Trang 11Copyright Gradient 2017
Overview of
Aquatic Toxicity of
Urban Stormwater Runoff
Puget Sound Clean Cars Stormwater Partnership Working Group, April 28, 2017
Dr Jenifer McIntyre | School of the Environment | WSU Puyallup Research Extension Center
Trang 1212 12
Research PARTNERS & SUPPORTERS
Trang 13Copyright Gradient 2017
13
Coho pre-spawn mortality is widespread
& recurrent in urban creeks
Longfellow Creek, 2003 Des Moines Creek, 2004
Longfellow Creek, 2005 Longfellow Creek, 2012
63%
84% 67%
72%
Trang 14stormwaterclean well water
Adult coho exposures to road runoff
Trang 17Copyright Gradient 2017
Sublethal effects in zebrafish
Sublethal effects of runoff on developing fish include:
• Inability/delay to hatch
• Developmental delays
• Small eye phenotype (*)
• Pericardial edema (yellow arrow)
• Deformed jaws and hearts (black arrows)
Trang 19Copyright Gradient 2017
A What chemical(s) in road runoff cause observed
toxicity to aquatic animals?
B Can we generate a phenotypically-anchored
synthetic stormwater runoff?
Trang 2020 Which are most toxic? Which contribute most to toxicity?
Tire Wear Exhaust Brakes Washer Fluid
Trang 21Copyright Gradient 2017
Relative Toxicity of Sources of Toxics
Toxics Source LC50 Length Eye
Trang 22Continuing Work on Sources of Toxics
Next Toxicology Steps:
• Definitive tests for acute lethal and sublethal toxicity
• Finish ‘leaks’ (remaining: gear oil, steering fluid, HR, CVA)
• Test remaining ‘dusts’ (brake dust, exhaust particulates)
Concurrent:
• How much does each source contribute to the mixture
of urban stormwater runoff?
• Literature reviews of percent material in runoff/road dust
• Using analytical chemistry to determine contributions
• Dr Ed Kolodziej (UW – Tacoma)
• Quadrupole Time of Flight (Q-TOF)
• ‘Fingerprint’ sources, compare to whole runoff
• Test synthetic mixtures for phenotypic responses
Trang 23Copyright Gradient 2017
Validate synthetic mixture on coho salmon!
Trang 25Copyright Gradient 2017
Automotive Fluid Leakage
Some Recent Studies Indicate:
40-50% of all vehicles on the road have some type of minor or major leak
Engine oil is the predominant leak
Trang 27Copyright Gradient 2017
Automotive Fluid Leakage
SAE Technical Committees
Over 500 committees, 9000 committee members, 2900 companies
Some activity in all systems previously mentioned
Primarily new vehicle design standards
SAE Technical Authors
Over 25 major conferences per year, over 2600 technical papers per year
Trang 28Automotive Fluid Leakage
Suggested Strategy of this Project Working Group:
Identify the area(s) for deeper dive
• For possible technical committee input/response
• For more targeted lit search
• For contact with selected authors
Work through the SAE Consultant WG member (Marcel Halberstadt) to help coordinate these requests
Trang 29Copyright Gradient 2017
• Data will be collected as part of an ongoing literature search and review, interviews with outside parties and through stakeholder discussions
• Quarterly web-meetings (April 2017 – June 2018)
30-60 minutes in length
Discuss project related tasks, information needs and progress updates
• Final Report and Presentation
Findings and information collected will be summarized in a final report delivered to Ecology in June 2018.
Findings will also be presented at a future SAE conference (date TBD)
Project Deliverables
Trang 30• Background on automobile fluid leaks
Environmental and human health impacts
Vehicle leak data (sources, frequency, volume)
Automotive designs relevant to fluid leaks (gaskets, seals)
Maintenance efforts related to automobile leaks
• Approaches to reduce vehicle leaks
Innovative technologies and onboard diagnostics
Policy options (incentives, case studies)
• Drivers and barriers to reducing leaks
Institutional (adaptability of design and manufacturing processes), regulatory, market
• Safer chemical alternatives - lubricants, gaskets, seals,
adhesives, etc.
Broad Research Areas for Final Report
Trang 31Copyright Gradient 2017
Open Discussion
• As a working group member, what are your particular
interests in this project? What do you think you will be able
to contribute?
• What do you see as the largest challenge to addressing this issue?
• Do you have any suggestions for how the project should
proceed (e.g., technical resources to investigate)?
Trang 32Next Steps and Follow-Up
• Operations Team (Ecology, Gradient, SAE) will follow up with Working Group members via email/phone to:
Provide meeting minutes
Confirm technical data gathering assignments and proposed timeline for completion
Poll possible dates for the next quarterly web meeting