Texas Persistence RatesFall-to-Fall Persistence Rate by Entering Cohort Year National Student Clearinghouse 2018.. The cost of student attrition to your institution: Revenue Lost Change
Trang 1Student Retention 2016-2017
Trang 2Why retention?
Trang 3National Retention Data
Of all students who started college in fall 2016,
73.9 percent persisted at any U.S institution in
their starting institution.
National Student Clearinghouse (2018) Snapshot Report First Year Persistence and Retention Retrieved from
https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport33-first-year-persistence-and-retention/
Trang 4National Student Clearinghouse (2018) Snapshot Report First Year Persistence and Retention
Trang 5National Student Clearinghouse (2018) Snapshot Report First Year Persistence and Retention
Trang 6Texas Retention Rates
National Student Clearinghouse (2018) Snapshot Report First Year Persistence and Retention
Trang 7Texas Persistence Rates
Fall-to-Fall Persistence Rate by Entering Cohort Year
National Student Clearinghouse (2018) Snapshot Report First Year Persistence and Retention
Trang 8Peer Institutions
74.00% 76.00% 78.00% 80.00% 82.00% 84.00% 86.00% 88.00% Aspirational
Trang 9Texas Peer Institutions
UH
UTA
UNT
FTIC Retention 2014-2015
Trang 10UNT Retention Data
Trang 11UNT Retention Data
73.00% 73.50% 74.00% 74.50% 75.00% 75.50% 76.00% 76.50% 77.00% 77.50% 78.00% 2012
Trang 12FTIC – First Generation Status
78.07
75.1
79.65
72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
FTIC Overall First Generation Not First Generation
Trang 13FTIC Retention by Gender
78.07
76.57
79.28
75 75.5 76 76.5 77 77.5 78 78.5 79 79.5
Trang 140 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 FTIC
Black White Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander
Native American
Other Non-resident Alien
FTIC by Ethnicity
Trang 15FTIC Retention Rate by Application Date
Trang 16Why do students leave?
Trang 17College Doesn't Care
Schedule 11%
Not Worth It 13%
Source: Educational Policy Institute
Trang 18Reason for Withdrawal Request 17-18
Mental Health 16.22% Financial Aid 2.85% Work/Class Conflict 11.55% Relocating 2.47% Family Emergency 11.28% Relationship Change 1.72% Financial Difficulty 9.40% Birth/Pregnancy 1.61% Health/Accident 8.97% Transportation 1.45% Personal 7.04% Child Care 1.40% Took New Job 6.98% Transfer 1.40% Academic Difficulty 5.69% Lost Job 1.29%
Other Academic 3.49%
Trang 1965.00% 67.00% 69.00% 71.00% 73.00% 75.00% 77.00% 79.00% 81.00% 83.00% 85.00%
TFI: 150K and aboveTFI:140-149K
TFI:130-139KTFI:120-129KTFI:110-119KTFI:100-109KTFI:90-99K
TFI:80-89KTFI:70-79KTFI:60-69KTFI:50-59KTFI:40-49KTFI:30-39KTFI:20-29KTFI:10-19KTFI:1-9K
EFC=0FTIC Overall
Retention by Financial Aid Information
Trang 20The Cost of Attrition
Trang 21Lifetime value of undergraduate student
Average time to
FTIC 4 10,853 $43,412
Transfer 2 10,853 $21706
Trang 22UNT’s performance
6-year Grad Rate 6-year Attrition Rate (A) Tuition (T) Undergraduate FTE Adjusted FTE (P) Projected Loss from
Trang 23The cost of student attrition
to your institution: Revenue Lost
Change in Lost Revenue by Increasing Freshman-to-Sophomore Retention by:
THIS ACADEMIC YEAR ONLY
from all students
(sophomore, junior, and
seniors) who did not return
from the previous academic
year.
43,324,099 41,975,067 40,641,541 39,292,508 37,943,476 36,594,443
FRESHMAN STUDENTS ONLY
those who will never return
to your institution over a
typical four-year period.
66,825,411 60,406,339 53,939,364 47,520,292 41,101,220 34,682,149
ALL STUDENTS, ALL YEARS
Freshman, sophomore,
junior, and seniors who left
over a typical four-year
period.
100,597,843 95,315,524 90,017,224 84,734,905 79,468,547 74,186,228
IMPORTANT NOTE: These figures DO NOT include funds spend on recruitment, admissions, student, and academic services spent on
students who did not succeed The addition of these funds would add significant dollars to the total numbers above.
Source: EPI Retention Calculator
Trang 24Change in Revenue by Increasing the Freshman-to-Sophomore Retention rate by:
2.5% 5.0% 7.5% 10.0% 12.5%THIS ACADEMIC YEAR ONLY from
all students (sophomore, junior,
and seniors) who did not return
from the previous academic year
1,349,032 2,682,559 4,031,591 5,380,624 6,729,656
FRESHMAN STUDENTS ONLY those
who will never return to your
institution over a typical four-year
period
6,419,072 12,886,047 19,305,119 25,724,190 32,143,262
ALL STUDENTS, ALL YEARS
Freshman, sophomore, junior, and
seniors who left over a typical
Trang 25How does Student Affairs affect
retention?
Trang 26What are our assumptions about student persistence?
Individual student characteristics
Institutional environment
Tinto’s Student Integration Model
Engagement – socially and academically
Astin’s Theory of Student Involvement
Trang 27Retention Rates by housing
FTIC Campus Housing Not on Campus
-City of Denton Commuting - withinDenton Co outside Denton CoCommuting
-FTIC Retenion by Housing - 2016/2017
Trang 28FTIC Retention Rates by Orientation Date
Trang 29Transfer Retention Rates by Orientation Date
Trang 30Student Veteran Services
User retention rate 83.06%Veteran non-user retention rate 24.26%
Trang 31Emerald Eagle Scholars Retention
Trang 32Foster Care Alumni Outcomes
Retention rate (including graduates) 82.71%
Trang 33ACCESS Mentoring Program
Retained 95.08% 483 participants
FTIC retention 78.07% 17.01% difference
Average Freshman GPA 2.5
Average all UG GPA 2.91
Average GPA participants 2.82 -.09 from campus GPAMedian GPA participants 3.1 +.19 from campus GPA
Fall 2016 Cohort
Trang 34Residence Life and Housing Student Success Meetings
Academics, or Personal
Trang 35Student Success Meeting Outcomes
2016 – 43% of on campus population had a SSM (1755 students)
Students who participated in a SSM retained at 81% vs 76% for
those who did not
Largest impact was on students who graduated in 2nd quartile of HS class
2nd quartile is largest population of FTIC students living on campus – 37%
Trang 36Card Swipe Data & Unit/Program Retention Results
Trang 37Departments included in Card Swipe data
Center for Leadership & ServiceCenter for Student Affairs –Discovery ParkDean of Students
Office of Disability AccommodationsOrientation & Transition
SHWC Meadows CenterStudent Support Services (TRIO)Student Activities Center
Student Money Management CenterStudent Veteran Services Center
University Program Council
Trang 38Retention Impact based on Card Swipe Data
*Includes all students (grad, TAMS, returning, etc.)
Trang 41FTIC Retention Impact
based on Card Swipe Data
FTIC Non cardswipe users retention 68.09%
Trang 420 swipes 1 swipe 1-5 swipes 6-10 swipes 11-15 swipes 16-20 swipes 21 or more
FTIC Retention by Number of Swipes
Trang 44Card Swipe Unit User Retention Rate Non User
Retention Rate Difference
Center for Leadership & Svc 91.47% 83.41% 8.07%Ctr for Stud Aff - Disc Park 93.76% 83.06% 10.70%Dean of Students - Gen 65.40% 83.71% -18.31%Office of Disability Accom 84.76% 83.42% 1.35%Orientation & Transition 84.90% 83.40% 1.50%
Student Activities Center 88.02% 82.48% 5.54%Student Money Mgmt Center 81.22% 83.50% -2.28%Student Veterans Services Center 85.40% 83.42% 1.98%
Trang 45Ctr for Stud Aff - Disc Park
Dean of Students - Gen
Office of Disability Accom
Orientation & Transition
SHWC Meadows Center
Stud Sup Srvs Student Activities Center
Student Money Mgmt Center
Student Veterans Services Center
Univ Program Council
User vs Non-user retention
All-campus retention Non User Retention Rate User Retention Rate
Trang 46Student Affairs Impact on GPA
Trang 50FTIC GPA by number of swipes per dept.
Number of Swipes
Trang 51Center for Leadership and
Service Center for Student Affairsat Discovery Park Counseling and Testing Dean of Students
FTIC GPA by number of swipes per dept
0 swipes 1 swipe 2 swipes 3 swipes
Trang 52Accommodations Orientation, Transition and Parent Programs SHWC Student Activities Center
FTIC GPA by number of swipes per dept
0 swipes 1 swipe 2 swipes 3 swipes
Trang 53Student Support
Services Student VeteransServices Center Union UPC
FTIC GPA by number of swipes per dept
0 swipes 1 swipe 2 swipes 3 swipes
Trang 54Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Spring 2016 Fall 2016 Spring 2017 Fall 2017 Spring 2018
All Greek GPA vs all Undergraduate GPA
2013-2018
All UG GPA All Greek GPA
Trang 552014 Fall 2014 Spring2015 Fall 2015 Spring2016 Fall 2016 Spring2017 Fall 2017 Spring2018
All Fraternity GPA vs All UG Men GPA
2013-2018
All Men's GPA All Fraternity GPA
Trang 562014 Fall 2014 Spring2015 Fall 2015 Spring2016 Fall 2016 Spring2017 Fall 2017 Spring2018
All Sorority GPA vs All UG Women's GPA
2013-2018
All Women's GPA All Sorority GPA
Trang 57Recreation Center Users by GPA
Users Non users
Trang 58What can we do to increase
student retention?