It is clear the debates and advances in modern science,especiallyinthefieldofevolutionandgenetics,havebeenslow to reach SouthAfrican classrooms.Yet in the wor
Trang 1Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Trang 2HumanSciencesResearchCouncilinassociationwiththeAfricaGenomeEducationInstitute PublishedbyHSRCPress
Trang 4Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Trang 5This book is about science and the ways we have ofunderstandingitssystemsofconcepts.Whatdowemeanwhenwesaythatthesesystemsareunobservable?How,ifthatistrue,canwethengraspthemeaningsembeddedinscientificwork?
It is clear the debates and advances in modern science,especiallyinthefieldofevolutionandgenetics,havebeenslow to reach SouthAfrican classrooms.Yet in the worldbeyondtheschool,teachersandstudentsbecomeawareof fresh thought and new discoveries through the massmedia.Frequentlytheseideasarebeingpresentedthroughcompellingimages.Inthepopularmediathe‘sacred’knowl-edgeofscienceismostpowerfullyevokedthroughtheuseofimages.Writtenscientificreportsaredense,lengthyandcomplicated, but images are able to carry complex infor-mationinasingleperspective.Butwehavetolearnhow
Trang 6thetruthsofreligionintothelivesofordinaryfolk.Thecre-ation and interpretthetruthsofreligionintothelivesofordinaryfolk.Thecre-ation of images became a prized skill.
Images were employed to teach the most complex
doc-trinal issues – among them the nature of theTrinity, themeaning and process of virgin birth, and above all, thesignificance for the human world of the crucifixion.Thegreat visual interpreters were the artists and architectswhose work is preserved still in the great religious artand architecture of the past.We, in our time, have well-developedskillsinwritingandreadingwordsbutwehavetorelearntheskillsofreadingimages
This book about scientific visual literacy focuses on themostdynamicareaofcontemporaryhumandiscovery.Thetheory of evolution, though long established in its basicterms,hasseendramaticnewdevelopmentsincethedis-coveryofthestructureofDNA.
Trang 7Note: It is assumed that both teachers and students willalreadyhavesomeknowledgeoftheiconsandthattheywillalsobereadilyaccessibleforfurtherstudy.
Section3usestheissuesarisingfromtheprecedingcritical analysis as a way to develop a newTree of Life icon.Thisiconisnotexpectedtobeperfectrepresentations.Theaimistohighlightmisconceptionsandsimplicitiesevidentin current icons and to generate debate around currentevolutionary theories and the broader questions of visualliteracy
-Section4liststhereferencematerialusedinmakingthis
edbookwillbegiven.Thiswillassistfurtherresearchintothethemespresentedinthisbook
Trang 8Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za
Trang 9However, in the Life Sciences images continue to carrypower and authority. Images remain in the form ofdiagramsordrawingsdevelopedforspecificinterpretativepurposes.Theyareconsideredindispensableforcommuni-catingideasandconceptsandtheyarenotseenasmereillustrativesupplementstowrittentexts.Buttheskillstograsptheirfullmeaningoftenremainbeyondthestudents’(andteachers’)capacities.Thereasonisthattheyhavenotbeengiventheopportunitytolearntoreadorvalueimagesinasimilarwaytowrittentext.Students(andteachers)arethereforenotabletodrawonasourceofinformationwhichiscriticaltoanunderstandingoftheLifeSciences.
Trang 10Visual literacy is certainly important in the Life Sciences
ing’ and ‘seeing’. ‘Looking’ is a physical process – theimage of a tree falls on the surface of the retina of oureye.Itisapassiveevent.‘Seeing’ontheotherhandisanactiveprocessmediatedbythemind.Inseeing,theimageontheretinaisconsciouslygraspedandinterpretedintheprocessesofthemind.Untutored,wecanlookatanimagebutseenothing.Visualliteracyisaskillthatrequiresbothlookingandseeing.Interpretingandunderstandingimages(i.e.‘seeingthemactively’)playsacriticalcommunicativeroleinbothscientificandpopularcontexts.Tounderstandthecommunicativepowerofimages(andtheimportanceofvisualliteracy)weneedtoaskwhatmakesimagesso
Weneedtomakeanimportantdistinctionbetween‘look-‘special’? Why are they so effective in communicatingcomplexconcepts?
Trang 11We can start by saying that images communicate faster
There are of course tantdifferencesofcharacterbetween popular and scien-tific images.The images ofpopularculturearecreatedtograbattentionandcommuni-cate information as quicklyas possible, and they mustbenovelandentertainingatthesametime.Ifimagesaretocommunicatequicklytheyneedasimplemessage.Theycannotasktheviewertopro-cess too much information.Theresultisthatpopularim-agestendtobeeye-catchingand easily understood butwithout internal complexity.Theyaskfornomorethanasimpleandsuperficialunder-standing.Inthenever-endingflowofvisualmaterialstheyareoftenquicklyforgotten.
Trang 12interpretation. Scientific images are exceptionally rich in
content because the concepts they carry are meaningful
only within the context of the network of scientific
to guide the student to an understanding of the images.
The teacher becomes a bridge between the student and
agethatistheprimaryfocusofattentionandnotthewrit-tentext.Asanexample,considertheoriginalCrick/WatsonarticlethatrevealedthestructureofDNA–thedoublehelix.Veryfewpeoplewillrememberwhatthetextinthisarticleis about but everyone remembers the image.This is thepowerofimages.Butthetextwasneededto‘introduce’theimage–torevealitscreationprocess.Therefore,withinthescientificcommunityimagesareunderstoodnotasad-ditions to written texts but rather primary texts in them-selves.Thisisincontrasttothegeneralunder-valuationofimages,andconsequentlyvisualliteracy,inschools.
Trang 13purpose in mind.Their aim is to channel meaning, which
means ‘to reduce the potential proliferation of meanings
that artistic images exploit’.This is achieved by removing
ping(theprocedureforalteringtheouterframe).‘Focusing’islikezoominginon,andcropping,theobjectsothatonlythepartoftheimagethatisofinterestremainswithintheframe–thusremovingnon-relevantinformation.Finally,‘fil-tering’simplifieswhathasalreadybeenframedorfocused.Thisisachievedbysimplifyingtheforms,removingcolour,texture,perspective,depthandbackground.Theresultisahighlymodifiedimage.Collectivelytheprocessofchannel-lingisknownasmathematisation.Mathematisationistheprocessofapplyingmathematicalordertonaturalobjects.This involves removing all possible traces of the naturalorganicformsandreplacingthemwithmoregeometricalrepresentations.
‘Framing’iswherethewholeobjectisshownwithoutcrop-Channelling may sound grand and complicated but it issomethingthatwealldoeveryday.Whenwelookattheworld we don’t see everything there is to see but ratheronlythatwhichinterestsusorcatchesourattention.Wefil-teroutinformationconstantly,makingitsimplesothatwe
Trang 14Thissimpletransformation–fromlookingatchaoticthree-dimensional forms to seeing less confusing images on
paper – is often overlooked. The original objects are
The interesting thing is that in the making of scientific
images the filtering processes of everyday vision are
re-
versed.Insteadofanobjectbeingtransformedbytheper-ceiver into an idea which is then made tangible through
representation,inscienceanideaismadetangiblethrougharepresentationthatbecomesanobject.Theretinahasbeenturnedinsideout–asitwere‘externalised’.Thesubstrate(paper,monitor,poster)onwhichtheimageisinscribedbe-comestheretina(therawdata),butinaformthatmakesit‘mobile’andopentoenquiryanddetailedinvestigation.It is important to note that although the image has be-comevisuallymoreorderedbytheselectionandremovalofinformation,ithasbecomemoretheoreticallycomplex.Selectionofwhatistoberemovedisevaluatedbythees-tablished way scientific methods of visualisation simplifyandschematiseobjectsofstudy.Overtimethisprocess,consistentlyapplied,hasresultedinimagesthataresaidtobe‘opticallyconsistent’
Optical consistency is a manifestation of the channellingprocess.Through long-established usage in the scientificcommunity the process of creating scientific images hasbecomeconventionalisedandinstitutionalisedtothepointwhere the created images display similar visual conven-tions.The advantage gained is that the creation process,andthusthethoughtprocessoftheimage,becomesin-scribed within the images themselves.The result is thatscientific images are able to cross both linguistic andcontextual boundaries.The disadvantage however is thatpeoplewhodonotgraspthecreationprocessandthecon-ventionswhichgovernitwillnothaveeasyaccesstothewealthofmeaningandinformation.ThisisthereasonthateducationinvisualliteracywithintheLifeSciencesisvitallyimportant.
We will now list some of these conventions and explaintheirimportance
Labelling
Labellingissomethingthatwehaveallcomeintocontactwith.Thereareconventionsabouthowtolabeldiagramswhichwearealltaughtearlyoninourschoolcareers.Attimestheseconventionsmayseemtobepedanticbuttheyaresimpleandimportantstepsinopticalconsistency
Trang 15ence made through the investigation of images is thatit becomes possible to study things that no longer existor even those that have never existed.We cannot studyliving dinosaurs – they can no longer be observed in liv-ingform–butthroughconstructedimageswemakethem
Imagesbecomeobjectsofinvestigation.Thegainforsci-visible. It is through the images that we see the
dino-saurs.ThesameistrueofDNA.Itistheminutesizeofthegenesthatrenderstheminvisiblebutoncerepresentedon
Trang 16paper with visual consistency we can critically evaluate
Adifferentexampleisperspective.Wereadilyunderstandtheconstructionofspaceonaflatsurfacebecauseweareabletoreadconverginglinesas‘goingbackinspace’.Wealso take it for granted that strongly textured objects areclosertotheviewerandlightershadedobjectsarefurtherawayinthebackground.Theseconventionsdidnotalwaysexist.Theyarenota‘natural’wayofseeing.Theywerein-ventedbyartistsandpainters.SouthAfricanrockartdem-onstratesatotallydifferentwayofseeingbecauseitwasmadebeforetheconventionsofclassicalpaintinghadbeeninvented and accepted. We inherit the conventions andtheybecomefixedinourmindsbythecanonsofclassicalpainting.
TypesofscientificimagesEarlierwelookedattherelationshipbetweenobject,im-age,text,teacher,andstudent.Wewillnowlookatthere-lationshipbetweenfourdifferenttypesofimagecommonlyused within the Life Sciences – photographs, diagrams,modelsandfinally,icons.Ouraimistoshowfurtherthedegreetowhichseeminglynaturalobjectsaremanipulatedtoconformtothepurposeofthescientistwhodeterminestheformoftheimage.Ifwecannotunderstandthecapaci-tiesandlimitsofthedifferenttypesofimageweruntheriskofmisinterpretingtheparticularimage.Oncemoreweareconfrontedwiththeneedtodevelopourvisualliteracy
Photographsaregenerallythoughtofasobjectiverecord-ingsofthenaturalworldduetotheirhighformaldefinition.Becauseoftheirhighmodalityphotographsareoftenpre-sentedasaguaranteetotheauthenticityofthetextanddi-agramstowhichtheyareadjacent.Butthismasksthefactthattheyhavebeenmanipulated;theobjectorspecimentobephotographedispreparedbeforethephotographis
Trang 17to highlight the purpose of the scientist. In addition, in
order to make the image simpler to read, cells are
frequentlyphotographedinaslicedorflattenedstateand
notshownintheirentirety.Withtheexceptionofoccasional
explanatorydiagrams,perspectiveisrarelyusedinphoto-graphicillustrationsinscientificarticles,andblackandwhite
photography is often used before colour, since colour
is usually regarded as irrelevant to the meaning of the
image.Moreoverthephotographisinvariablyframedand
focused,sometimeswiththeadditionoflabelling,orpoint-ingintheformofarrows,directedtospecificareaswithinthe
photograph.
In short we can see that the potentially objective
photo-graphic image has been highly refined and its meanings
channelled before the photograph has even been taken.
InfactthepopularrepresentationofDNAlooksnothinglikethe‘realthing’asseenthroughamicroscope
A diagram is a rendering or transformation of a graph.Relativetothediagram,thephotographappearstobemore‘original’material,whereasthediagramismoreevidentlyanalysed,labelled,andmentallyconstructed.Wemightasaresultbeinclinedtosaythatthediagramisa‘re-duction’ofthephotograph,asimplificationthatismorere-finedorworkedon.Thereisapairedrelationshipbetweenthemanditisnotonlysequential;eachphotographisnotsimplymoreoriginal‘intime’butispresentedrelativetothediagramasoriginalevidence.Thephoto’sphotochemi-caltransferscanbeinvokedtoexplainitsimageassome-thing ‘more real’ than an artistic creation. It is as thoughthe image is imparted by the object itself. Of course, aswehavealreadydiscussed,thisisnotnecessarilythecase
Trang 18to the current state of the discipline.The diagram has to
be seen as a more mathematical and ordered version of
a given photograph.Yet the diagram is not an ‘ideal’
In this way it provides a document of phenomena which
cannot fully be observed by the scientist or represented
Aniconcanbethoughtofasthesynthesisofthepopularandtheabstractedscientificimage.Itisboththeory-ladenand visually appealing. It can thus happily coexist withinboth the popular and scientific contexts. This accountsfor its power to communicate a vast amount of informa-tionquicklyandeasilywithindiversecontextsonaglobalscale.Certainlyourperceptionofwhatisiconicisasmuchformedbytheframe(society,ourculture,themethodsofpresentation)asitisbythecoreobjectitself.Iconschangeappearancedependingonhowyoulookatthem.Theim-agechannelsmeaningbuttheviewerstillplaysaroleintheinterpretationoftheimage
Trang 19Icons are repositories of meaning at a certain time andplaceandforacertainaudience.Theythereforehavetobeupdatedasknowledgeandtimeschange.Thisprocessofchangeandupdatingiscalledcascadingofimagesandislikenedtotheprocessofevolutionitself.Thisisoneofthefunctions for this booklet, to disseminate current theoryandcontentinthenewLifeSciencescurriculum–toup-dateit.
However,gooddesign,itturnsout,doesnotalwayssolveproblems.Instead,itmakesusawareofbothproblemsandpotentialities. It frames and forms the spaces we inhabitandthetoolsweuseintocoherentconstructsthatreflectourownhumanity,whichisourabilitytomakeaworldforandofourselves.Gooddesignmakesuswonder.Andsovisualskillswithwhichonecancriticallylookatimagesbe-comevitallyimportant.Withoutthesevisualskillsonecan-notseetheproblemsandpotentialities.Onedoesnotsee,oneonlylooks
Trang 20Free download from www.hsrcpress.ac.za