1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Confined Space Entry Training and Workshop

55 5 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Confined Space Entry Training and Workshop
Trường học Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
Chuyên ngành Occupational Safety and Health
Thể loại training manual
Năm xuất bản 2024
Thành phố Lansing
Định dạng
Số trang 55
Dung lượng 356 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

TABLE OF CONTENTSPart 90 Confined Space Entry and Other Confined Space Related Safety & Health Standards...1 Permit Required Confined Space Identify & Classify...24 Confined Space Hazar

Trang 1

Confined Space

Entry

Training and Workshop

Consultation Education & Training Division

Michigan Occupational Safety & Health Administration Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

www.michigan.gov/miosha

(517) 284-7720

SP #28 (Revised 04/04)

Trang 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part 90 Confined Space Entry and

Other Confined Space Related Safety & Health Standards 1

Permit Required Confined Space Identify & Classify 24

Confined Space Hazards 62

Compliance Resources 76

Duties of Entry Supervisor, Attendant, Authorized Entrant 120

Help on the Internet 128

Trang 4

[Reserved for MIOSHA Standard

Part 90 Confined Space Entry

and Part 490 Permit-Required Confined Spaces ]

Pages 3-22

Trang 5

Permit Required Confined Space

Identify & Classify

Trang 6

[Reserved for Permit Required Confined Spaces: Identify and Classify slide/

PowerPoint presentation]

Pages 24-38

Trang 7

PART 90 - CONFINED SPACE ENTRY Samples of Confined Spaces for Evaluation and Classification

Space #1

This space is a fresh-water, residential well 40-feet deep and 36 inches wide Usually it contains about

20 feet of water Concrete casings support the sides of the well, while the well floor is exposed soil to allow flow of groundwater, which is 35 - 40F

General maintenance requires that the existing water be pumped out and the employee be lowered to the bottom to brush down the concrete casings using well water and shovel muck from the well floor

Space #2

This space is a water meter pit, concrete lined, that is 8 feet x 12 feet x 10 feet deep (about 960 sq ft.)

It is accessed by a manhole cover leading to a vertical, fixed ladder Employees enter to take meter readings for the fire suppression water system The firm is located in Dearborn, an area known to have

a lot of methane and hydrogen sulfide soil gases

Space #3

This is a sulfuric acid storage tank made of stainless steel It measures 12 feet x 18 feet and 12 feet deep (about 2592 sq ft.) It is accessed by an 18 inch hatchway located on the top At the bottom of the tank is a small agitator blade near the drain pipe, which leads to a tank inside the plant for parts cleaning The acid is delivered by tanker trucks at which time the in-take valve cover is opened and the truck’s supply pipe is connected About once a year the tank is emptied and cleaned out, at which time the agitator is p.m.’d

Trang 8

WORKPLACE EVALUATION FOR THE EXISTENCE OF PERMIT REQUIRED CONFINED SPACES

1 Date of Survey and Signature of Surveyor

2 Space Name / Location and Description

3 Confined Space? YES / NO

If answer YES to all 3, then this is a confined

space.

1 Is the space large enough and so configured that an employee can bodily enter and perform assigned work? YES / NO

2 Does the space have limited or restricted means for entry or exit? YES / NO

3 Is the space not designed for continuous employee occupancy? YES / NO

4 Permit Required Confined Space?

If #3 is Yes, and one of these conditions is Yes,

then this is a Permit Required Confined Space

(PRCS), so continue to #5.

Does it contain of have the potential to contain a hazardous atmosphere? YES / NO Does it contain a material that has the potential for engulfing an entrant? YES /NO Does it have an internal configuration such that an entrant could be trapped or asphyxiated by inwardly converging walls or by a floor that slopes downward and tapers to a smaller cross-section? YES / NO Does it contain any other recognized serious safety or health hazard? YES / NO

5A Indicate Actual or Potential Atmospheric

Hazards.

_ Oxygen deficiency _ (19.5% to 23.5%) _ Flammable Substances _ (less than 10% of LFL) _ Toxic Materials _ (not to exceed PELs) _ Carbon Monoxide _ (CO 35 PPM) _ Hydrogen Sulfide _ (H 2 S 10 PPM)

5B Indicate Physical Hazards and Identify

Source Flowable SubstancesInwardly Converging Walls NoiseHeat/Cold

Floor Slopes Downward Radiation Mechanical Hazards Asbestos Electrical Hazards Wet/Slippery

Conditions

6A Can you Control Atmospheric Hazards

Listed in 5A with Continuous Forced-Air

Ventilation? YES / NO

If YES and there are no physical hazards in the space, then you may use the alternate procedures for entering the space by completing the steps defined in paragraph (c5) of the standard before each and every entry Written certification of each entry must be documented and maintained The steps required to control the atmosphere must be part of your written Confined Space Program Once the space is closed back up, this is a Permit Required Confined Space requiring that all of there steps be followed the next time employee enters.

6B Can you Eliminate Physical Hazards Listed

in 5B without Entering the Space? YES / NO If YES and there are no atmospheric hazards in space, then you may re-classify to a non-permit space and enter according to paragraph (c7) of the standard The steps required to eliminate the hazard (usually Lockout/

Tagout procedures) must be part of, or referenced by, your written Confined Space Program Once the hazard has been reintroduced, this is a Permit Required Confined Space requiring that all steps be followed the next time employee enters.

7 Circle to Indicate the Type of Space This is:

(c5) (c7) (Full Permit) If you cannot eliminate the hazards using c7 to Reclassify and/or control the atmospheric hazards by using the Alternate Procedures - c5, then a FULL PERMIT ENTRY PROCEDURE (paragraphs d-k) must be used to

enter the space.

REMEMBER! IF CONDITIONS CHANGES, RE-EVALUATE!

Trang 9

Part 90-Confined Space Entry

Adopted from 1910.146 Permit Required Confined Spaces

Top 9 Violations-October 1, 1996-September 30, 1997

9) Rule (g)(4)

Maintain proper certification that all training required by paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) has been

accomplished

Trang 10

Part 90-Confined Space Entry

Top 9 Violations Compliance Resources

1 Rule (c)(1)

Evaluation form

OH-5310 “Confined Space Hazards”

“Examples of Spaces Found in the Workplace”

2 Rule (c)(4)

Standard Outline Checklist

Required Components

OH-5330 “Guidelines…Written Program”

OH-5310 “General Compliance Checklist”

OH-5320 “Alternate Entry Procedure Action Agenda”

3 Rule (c)(2)

Sample sign “Confined Space”

Additional Training for Employees

Trang 11

Part 90-Confined Space Entry

QUIZ

1 T F All confined spaces are Permit Required Confined Spaces?

2 T F If no one will ever enter the space, it is not considered a Permit Required

Confined Space (hereafter known as PRCS)?

3 T F Once a PRCS has been evaluated and classified, it never needs to be evaluated

6 T F The Attendant can become the Authorized Entrant?

7 T F The Attendant may not perform any other duties while monitoring a PRCS entry?

8 T F The Entry Supervisor must notify the rescue service prior to the initiation of a

full-permit entry?

9 T F The employer must allow the rescue service access to the workplace to perform

practice rescues at least once a year?

10 T F The duration of the entry permit need not be stated in terms of actual time, but

may be stated in terms of the completion of the task for which permit space entry

is being performed

11 T F All Entry Supervisors, Attendants, and Authorized Entrants must be identified by

name on the permit?

12 T F 'Direct reading" testing instruments only need to provide a warning sound rather

than show actual concentrations

13 T F The Attendant must know the physical warning signs that may indicate that

something has changed inside the confined space

14 T F The employer must review the program using canceled permits within 1 year

after each entry

Trang 12

15 Documentation supporting "Alternate Entry (C5)" procedures could include all the

following except:

a) Volume of space

b) Capacity and configuration of ventilation equipment to be used

c) Identified actual and potential atmospheric hazards

d) The Entry Supervisor’s name

e) Sampling results from testing of space from the time ventilation began through final determination of acceptable entry conditions

16 How long can a space, reclassified using the procedures of paragraph (c)(7), remain a

non-permit confined space?

a) One shift

b) As long as all hazards remain eliminated

c) As long as the job takes

d) As long as the boss says

Trang 13

FACE-93-17: Two Men Die in Well Cleaning Operation

The investigation was complicated in part by certain factors: the time lapse between the incident and the investigation, the number of emergency responders, the particular sequence

of events, and the time frames of these events, and differing perceptions of the series of events occurring in a crisis situation Therefore, a scenario of this incident was developed after carefully evaluating a diverse mixture of information The victims in this incident worked part-time as self-employed well cleaners and grave diggers This was the only source

of employment for victim #1 Victim #2 was employed full-time as a truck driver for the county in which the incident occurred Neither victim had any safety or confined space training However, both victims were aware that well cleaning was a dangerous job, according to the son of victim #2

INVESTIGATION

On May 1, 1993 three self-employed well cleaners - a 43-year-old male (victim #1), a year-old male (victim #2), and his 17-year-old son - arrived at the residential well site to clean a shallow (36-inch-diameter by 40-foot-deep) well They arrived at the work site at 9 a.m and used a portable gasoline pump to remove water from the well, which was filled to approximately the 20 foot level The gasoline pump was not adequate to remove all of the water, so the workmen went to a local equipment rental store and rented an electric sump pump to complete the job They placed the pump at the bottom of the well and pumped out the remaining water to a depth of 6 to 8 inches The victims did not use any type of

40-respiratory protection, atmospheric test equipment, or ventilation equipment during the well cleaning operation

Victim #1 was lowered into the well at approximately 10:30 a.m to begin cleaning A steel bucket, steel cable, and a homemade windlass were used to raise and lower workers,

supplies, and muck from the well The windlass was made of 2-inch by 6-inch wooden boards, crudely designed in an "X" configuration, with a steel bar across the top intersection

of the "X" which included a handle at each end (Figure) Victim #1 began shoveling muck out of the well and brushing down the sides Water was the only solvent used to clean the sides of the well Approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes later, victim #2, at the top of the well, asked victim #1 how much longer before the cleaning job would be completed Not hearing a response, victim #2 inquired as to the condition of victim #1 There was still no response The second victim's son asked the homeowner to call 911 (at approximately 11:50

Trang 14

a.m.), stating there was trouble in the well, then requested the homeowner's assistance in lowering his father (victim #2) into the well to rescue victim #1 In a rescue attempt, the son and the homeowner lowered victim #2 into the well on a small wooden (2 inch by 12 inch by

16 inch) board which served as a seat

Using his arms, victim #2 was able to secure his co-worker and was being hoisted up by his son and the homeowner when at approximately the halfway point (20 feet), the board that was supporting the victims started to crack Victim #2 yelled to his son to lower them back tothe bottom of the well Victim #1 was still semiconscious but unable to assist victim #2 in attempting to exit the well The two workers made no other attempt to leave the well until rescue units arrived The first rescue squad to arrive on the scene was the county emergency medical squad (EMS) at approximately 12 noon The paramedics from the EMS positioned their truck 5 to 7 feet from the well opening in order to use a light to see into the well A rope was thrown down to the victims but victim #2 was unable to secure the rope around victim #1 By this time, the well was starting to fill with water (approximately 10 feet deep), and the victims were treading water

Within 2 to 4 minutes after the first EMS unit arrived, the local volunteer fire unit arrived on the scene The first rescue unit was promptly ordered by the deputy chief of the local

volunteer fire unit to move their vehicle away from the well At this point, victim #2 was coherent enough to communicate with the rescuers, but was not able to use a rope to exit the well Victim #1 was not coherent, and was believed to be unconscious The second rescue unit was equipped for fire rescue Therefore, they only had 60 minute air tanks on the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA); they did not feel there was room in the well for a rescuer with full turn-out gear and an SCBA The deputy chief of the volunteer fire unit requested a 15-minute (smaller in size) unit be brought to the scene from the fire house, which was approximately 5 miles from the incident scene

Because victim #2 was going under the water, the volunteer fireman (rescuer #1) preparing

to make the descent into the well in a rescue attempt told the deputy chief they did not have time to wait for the 15-minute unit A decision was made to lower the fireman into the well without any respiratory protection, wearing the bottom half of the turn-out gear, a harness, and a lifeline The fireman was lowered into the well, which now had approximately 20 feet

of water, and was able to reach victim #2 within a few minutes and place a rescue line around him (The temperature of the water was between 35 and 40 degrees F, as reported by the volunteer fireman.) The rescuing fireman was then hoisted from the well without any ill effects from the atmosphere or the cold water (Note: the atmosphere was being tested beforeand after the fireman's entry - the oxygen level was measured at 17% by volume) Victim #2 was then pulled from the well, in an unresponsive condition Paramedics administered CPR and transported him to the local hospital where he was pronounced dead, after further life-saving efforts were unsuccessful

The elapsed time for the rescue of victim #2 was approximately 20 minutes after the first EMS arrived on the scene By the time Victim #2 was removed from the well, victim #1 had been underwater for approximately 30 minutes The volunteer fire unit was not prepared for

an underwater recovery; the decision was made to avoid the risk of losing a firefighter in what was believed to be at this point, a body recovery They chose in- stead to wait for the arrival of better equipped units, whose assistance had been requested to retrieve victim #1

Trang 15

Divers from an adjacent county arrived approximately 40 minutes after the second 911 call Two divers made separate dives (each equipped with self contained underwater breathing apparatus [SCUBA], full rubberized diving suits, underwater lights, and life lines) The first diver (rescuer #2) found victim #1 at the bottom of the well and managed to get a rope around him; however, when they attempted to raise him from the well, the victim slipped out

of the rope and sank back to the bottom The second diver (rescuer #3) was unsuccessful in his attempt to secure a line to the victim A volunteer fireman from the local fire department (rescuer #4) entered the well wearing SCUBA; however, he was also unsuccessful in his recovery attempt, and complained of the cold water inhibiting his ability to recover the victim A specialized confined space rescue team had now arrived from a different county and requested the area be cleared of all those working on the rescue effort The specialized rescue team sent one of their divers (rescuer #5) wearing SCUBA, a full rubberized suit, life line, underwater lights, and communication equipment into the well It took approximately

20 minutes for this diver to secure a line to victim #1 Victim #1 was then recovered from thewell, approximately 4 hours after the initial 911 call Victim #1 was pronounced dead at the scene by a forensic examiner

In summarizing this confined space investigation, there were three major hazards identified: (1) oxygen deficient atmosphere (NIOSH, 1979), (2) toxic (carbon monoxide) atmosphere (NIOSH, 1972), and (3) cold water exposure (Golden, 1976) The medical examiner listed the blood carboxyhemoglobin saturation levels as 37% in victim #1 and 13% in victim #2 The bacterial action and biomass in the well could have been a source for a small percentage

of the carbon monoxide However, an external source was probably responsible for the largest percentage of carbon monoxide Testing conducted by the volunteer fire unit

indicated that the oxygen level (only gas tested) at the 20-foot level was 17% by volume When the well was pumped to the bottom, the oxygen level would have likely decreased to

12 to 15% by volume Under conditions of reduced ambient oxygen concentration, such as the reduced oxygen level in the well, the exposure to carbon monoxide was even more critical

The water temperature in the well was reported to be between 35 and 40 degrees F Survival time in water at 32 degrees F is predicted to be less than 15 minutes (Golden, 1976)

Trang 16

self-Discussion: There was no confined space entry program in effect at the residential well site

at the time of the incident The atmosphere was not tested before entry, no mechanical ventilation or respiratory protection was provided, and no rescue plans were developed Employers, even self-employed well cleaning operations, should develop and implement a written confined space entry program to address all provisions outlined in the following NIOSH Publications: Working in Confined Spaces: Criteria for a Recommended Standard (Pub No 80-106); NIOSH Alert, Request for Assistance in Preventing Occupational

Fatalities in Confined Spaces (Pub No 86-110); A Guide to Safety in Confined Spaces (Pub

No 87-113); and NIOSH Guide to Industrial Respiratory Protection (Pub No 87-116)

A confined space entry program should include the following:

1 written confined space entry procedures

2 evaluation to determine whether entry is necessary

3 issuance of a confined space entry permit

4 evaluation of the confined space by a qualified person

5 testing and monitoring the air quality in the confined space to ensure:

· oxygen level is at least 19.5%

· flammable range is less than 10% of the LFL (lower flammable limit)

· absence of toxic air contaminants

6 training of workers and supervisors in the selection and use of:

· safe entry procedures

· respiratory protection

· lifelines and retrieval systems

· protective clothing

7 training of employees in safe work procedures in and around confined spaces

8 training of employees in confined space rescue procedures

9 conducting safety meetings to discuss confined space safety

10 availability and use of proper ventilation equipment

11 monitoring the air quality while workers are in the confined space

Recommendation #2: Volunteer fire departments should identify the types of confined spaces within their jurisdiction and develop and implement confined space entry & rescue programs

Discussion: Volunteer firefighters may be required to enter confined spaces to perform eithernon-emergency tasks or emergency rescue Therefore, volunteer fire departments should identify the types of confined spaces within their jurisdiction and develop and implement confined space entry and rescue programs that include written emergency rescue guidelines and procedures for entering confined spaces A confined space program, as outlined in NIOSH Publications 80-106 and 87-113, should be implemented At a minimum, the

following should be addressed:

1 Is entry necessary? Can the task be accomplished from the outside? For example, many fire departments use an under- water search and rescue device which consists of

Trang 17

several sections of metal tubing connected together with a hook or retrieval device on the end Such a device can be used to retrieve objects out of a well without the need for entry Also, some fire departments in rural areas use water jet pumps, water siphonbooster pumps, or high pressure ejector pumps to pump water at depths greater that 15feet This type of pump can be lowered into a well to pump out the water without the need for anyone to enter the well Measures that eliminate the need for

firefighters to enter confined spaces should be carefully evaluated and implemented if

at all possible before considering human entry into confined spaces to perform emergency tasks

non-2 If entry is to be made, has the air quality in the confined space been tested for safety based on the following:

a oxygen supply at least 19.5%

b flammable range for all explosive gases less than 10% of the lower flammable limit

c absence of toxic air contaminants?

3 Is ventilation equipment available and/or used?

4 Is appropriate rescue equipment available?

5 Are firefighters and firefighter supervisors being continuously trained in the selection

and use of appropriate rescue equipment such as:

6 Are firefighters being properly trained in confined space entry procedures?

7 Are confined space safe work practices discussed in safety meetings?

8 Are firefighters trained in confined space rescue procedures?

9 Is the air quality monitored when the ventilation equipment is operating?

Trang 18

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard Z117.1-1989 (Safety

Requirements for Confined Spaces), 3.2 and 3.2.1 state, "Hazards shall be identified for each confined space The hazard identification process shall include, the past and current uses

of the confined space which may adversely affect the atmosphere of the confined space; The hazard identification process should consider items such as the operation of gasoline engine powered equipment in or around the confined space."

Recommendation #3: Volunteer fire departments should develop and implement a

respiratory protection program to protect firefighters from respiratory hazards

Discussion: The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1404 3-1.2 and 3-1.3(Standard for a Fire Department Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Program) state,

"Respiratory protection shall be used by all personnel who are exposed to respiratory hazards

or who may be exposed to such hazards without warning Respiratory protection

equipment shall be used by all personnel operating in confined spaces, below ground level,

or where the possibility of a contaminated or oxygen deficient atmosphere exists until or unless it can be established by monitoring and continuous sampling that the atmosphere is not contaminated or oxygen deficient." Volunteer fire departments should develop and implement a respiratory protection program which includes training in the proper selection and use of respiratory protection equipment according to NIOSH Guide to Industrial

Respiratory Protection (Publication No 87-116)

Recommendation #4: Volunteer fire departments should develop and implement a general safety program to help firefighters recognize, understand, and control hazards

Discussion: NFPA Standard 1500, 3-1.1 states that "The fire department shall establish and maintain a training and education program with the goal of preventing occupational

accidents, deaths, injuries, and illnesses." NFPA Standard 1500, 3-1.4 states that "The fire

department shall provide training and education for all members to ensure that they are able

to perform their assigned duties in a safe manner that does not present a hazard to themselves

or to other members." As part of a safety program, fire departments should carefully evaluateeach task to identify all potential hazards, (e.g., falls, electrocutions, burns, unsafe

atmospheres, etc.) and implement appropriate control measures

Trang 19

PART 90 – CONFINED SPACE ENTRY

Trang 20

Confined Space

Hazards

Trang 21

Part 90-Confined Space Entry How Atmospheric Hazards Occur

1 Previously Stored Products/Chemicals

2 Unexplained Leaks/Spills: Chlorine, Acetylene, Ammonia, Water

Trang 22

Part 90-Confined Space Entry Flammables and Combustibles

Combustible Liquids

Any liquid having a flash point at or above 100 F Combustible liquids are divided into two classes:

Class II- Liquids that have flash points at or above 100 F and below 140 F

Class III- Liquids that have flash points at or above 140 F They are further sub

dividers into tow subclasses:

Class IIIA- Liquids with flash points at or above 140 F and below 200 F.Class IIIB- Liquids with flash points at or above 200 F

Trang 23

Confined Space Hazards

 The hazards encountered and associated with entering and working in confined

spaces are capable of causing bodily injury, illness and death to the worker

 It should always be considered that the most unfavorable situation exists in every

confined space and that the danger of explosion, poisoning and asphyxiation will be present at the onset of entry

 Before forced ventilation is initiated, information such as restricted areas within the

confined space, voids, the nature of the contaminants present, the size of space, the type of work to be performed, and the number of people involved should be

considered

 The ventilation air should not create an additional hazard due to recirculation of

contaminants, improper arrangement of the inlet duct, or by the substitution of anything other than fresh (normal) air (approximately 20.9% oxygen, 78.1% nitrogen,and 1% argon with small amounts of various other gasses)

 The terms air and oxygen are sometimes considered synonymous However, this is a

dangerous assumption, since the use of oxygen in place of fresh (normal) air for

ventilation will expand the limits of flammability and increase the hazards of fire and explosion

Trang 24

Types of Confined Spaces

 Confined spaces can be categorized generally as those with open tops and with a

depth that will restrict the natural movement of air, and enclosed spaces with very limited openings for entry (In either case, the space may contain mechanical equipment with moving parts.)

 Degreasers Pits and certain types of storage tanks may be classified as open topped

confined spaces that usually contain no moving parts However, gases that are heavier than air (butane, propane, and other hydrocarbons) remain in depressions and will flow to low points where they are difficult to remove

 Other hazards may develop due to the work performed in the confined space or

because of corrosive residues that accelerate the decomposition of scaffolding supports and electrical components

 Confined spaces such as sewers, casings, tanks, silos, vaults, and compartments of

ships usually have limited access which increases the risk of injury

 Hazards specific to a confined space are dictated by:

1 the material stores of used in the confined space; as an example, damp

activated carbon in a filtration tank will absorb oxygen, thus creating an oxygen deficient atmosphere;

2 the activity carried out, such as the fermentation of molasses that created

ethyl alcohol vapors and decreases the oxygen content of the atmosphere; or

3 the external environment, as in the case of sewer systems that may be

affected by high tides, heavier that air gases, or flash floods

 The most hazardous kind of confined space is the type that combines limited access

and mechanical devises Digesters and boilers usually contain power-driven equipment, which, unless properly isolated, may be inadvertently activated after entry

Trang 25

Reasons for Entering Confined Spaces

 Usually done to perform a necessary function, such as inspection, repair, maintenance

(cleaning or painting), or similar operations, which would be an infrequent of irregular function of the total industrial activity

 Entry may also be made during new construction When the area meets the criteria for a

confined space, all ventilation and other requirements should be enforced

 One of the most difficult entries to control is that of unauthorized entry, especially

when there are large number of workers and trades involved, such as welders, painters, electricians, and safety monitors

 A final and most important reason for entry would be emergency rescue The standby

person and all rescue personnel should be aware of the structural design of the space, emergency exit procedures, and life support systems required

Flammable Atmospheres

 Generally arise from enriched oxygen atmospheres, vaporization of flammable

liquids, byproducts of work, chemical reactions, concentrations of combustible dusts, and desorption of chemical from inner surfaces of the confined space

 Flammable gases such as acetylene, butane, propane, hydrogen, methane, natural or

manufactured gases or vapors from liquid hydrocarbons can be trapped in confined spaces, and since many gases are heavier than air, they will seek lower levels as in pits, sewers, and various types of storage tanks and vessels

 In a closed top tank, lighter than air gases may rise and develop a flammable

concentration if trapped above the opening

 The byproducts of work procedures such as spray painting can generate flammable or

explosive conditions within a confined space

 Welding in a confined space is a major cause of explosions in areas that contained

combustible gas

 Combustible dust concentrations are usually found during the process of loading,

unloading and conveying grain products, nitrated fertilizers, finely ground chemical products, and any other combustible material

Trang 26

2 The product stored [removing decomposed organic materials from a tank can liberate toxic substances, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S)].

3 The operation performed in the confined space (for example, welding or brazingwith metals capable of producing toxic fumes)

 During loading, unloading, formulation, and production, mechanical and/or human

error may also produce toxic gases which are not part of the planned operation

 Carbon monoxide (CO) is a hazardous gas that may build up in a confined space

 Odorless, colorless gas approximately the same density as air is formed from

incomplete combustion of organic materials such as wood, coal, gas, oil, and gasoline; can be formed from microbial decomposition of organic matter in sewers, silos, and fermentation tanks

 Early stages of CO intoxication are nausea and headache May be fatal at

1000 ppm in air, and its considered dangerous at 200 ppm, because it forms carboxyhemoglobin in the blood, which prevents the distribution of oxygen inthe body

 A safe reading on a combustible gas indicator does not ensure that CO is not present

Carbon monoxide must be tested for specifically

 The formation of CO may result from chemical reactions or work activities, therefore

fatalities due to CO poisoning are not confined to any particular industry Examples:

 Sewage treatment plants due to decomposition products and lack of

ventilation in confined spaces

 Formation of silo gas in grain storage elevators

Trang 27

Irritant (Corrosive) Atmospheres

 Irritant or corrosive atmospheres can be divided into primary and secondary groups

 The primary irritants exert no systemic toxic effects (effects on the entire body)

Examples include chlorine, ozone, hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, sulfuric acid,nitrogen dioxide, ammonia, and sulfur dioxide

 A secondary irritant is one that may produce systematic toxic effects in addition to

surface irritation Examples include benzene, carbon tetrachloride, ethyl chloride, trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and chloropropene

 Irritant gases vary widely among all areas of industrial activity They can be found in

plastic plants, chemical plants, the petroleum industry, tanneries, refrigeration

industries, paint manufacturing, and mining operations

 Prolonged exposure at irritant or corrosive concentrations in a confined space may

produce little of no evidence of irritation but may result in a general weakening of thedefense reflexes from changes in sensitivity The danger in this situation is that the worker is usually not aware of any increase in his/her exposure to toxic substances

Ngày đăng: 19/10/2022, 00:30

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

w