Notes on the i3 Development Full Applications Received Summary Document

Applicant Type August 2013 Office of Innovation and Improvement Page 2 of 10 Non-profit w/consortium of... The summary table and graphic indicate the number of applicants that applied un

1 The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets submitted by applicants to the i3 grant program; because not all applicants submitted an Applicant Information Sheet, the

summary that follows does not necessarily include all applications in all summary data.

2 Inclusion of an application in the summary data that follows does not ensure that the application will be considered eligible for an award, or that the application will be funded by the Department of Education.

3 Inclusion of an application in this summary information is not an endorsement of an organization, idea, program, or product, and the Department does not validate or guarantee the accuracy of this information The data are provided in this summary solely for the convenience of the public

Applicant

Type

August 2013 Office of Innovation and Improvement Page 2 of 10

Non-profit w/consortium of

Absolute

Priority

AP1: Teacher and Principal

AP2: Low Performing Schools 28 19.72%

AP3: Improving STEM Education 28 19.72%

AP4: Students with Disabilities 10 7.04%

AP6: Parent and Family

AP7: Effective Use of Technology 18 12.68%

Absolute

Priority 8:

Serving Rural

Communities1

Total Applicants Responding to AP8: 21

1 Applicants applying under Absolute Priority 8 must address one of the other seven absolute priorities for the FY 2013 i3 Development competition while serving students enrolled in rural LEAs The summary table and graphic indicate the number of applicants that applied under Absolute Priority 8, as well as which additional Absolute Priorities they chose

August 2013 Office of Innovation and Improvement Page 4 of 10

Additional Absolute Priority Count Percent

AP1: Teacher and Principal

AP2: Low Performing Schools 1 4.76%

AP3: Improving STEM Education 7 33.33%

AP4: Students with Disabilities 0 0%

AP6: Parent and Family

AP7: Effective Use of Technology 4 19.05%

Pre-Applicant

Type

Highly Rated Pre-Applicant 109 76.76%

2 Classroom, Inc New York NY

3 San Diego County Superintendent of Schools San Diego CA

4 Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent School District Pharr TX

12 Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL) Denver CO

14 West Allis-West Milwaukee School District West Allis WI

19 West Allis-West Milwaukee School District West Allis WI

24 National Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform Savoy IL

26 The Research Foundation for the SUNY,University at Albany Albany NY

27 Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc Baltimore MD

28 The School District of Palm Beach County, Florida West Palm Beach FL

29 Georgia State University Research Foundation, Inc Atlanta GA

August 2013 Office of Innovation and Improvement Page 6 of 10

32 The School District of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA

33 Catholic Social Services of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA

34 Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation Nespelem WA

35 San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools San Bernardino CA

37 Challenger Center for Space Science Education Washington DC

47 Northern Kentucky Cooperative for Educational Services Cold Spring KY

56 The Regents of the University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz CA

63 Cabarrus County Schools Concord NC

71 Georgia State University Research Foundation, Inc Atlanta GA

82 Arkansas School for Mathematics, Sciences and the Arts Hot Springs AR

August 2013 Office of Innovation and Improvement Page 8 of 10

94 Regents of the University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA

98 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative Bowling Green KY

102 School District No 1 in the City and County of Denver Denver CO

112 University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc Lawrence KS

119 Office of the State Superintendent of Education Washington DC

125 Bridgeport City School District Bridgeport CT

August 2013 Office of Innovation and Improvement Page 10 of 10