Introduction Among the column packing materials used for solid phase extraction SPE chromatography the extractant liquid organic extractant and/or a liquid ion-exchanger of high molecul
Trang 1New SPE column packing material: Retention assessment method
and its application for the radionuclide chromatographic separation
Le Van So*, N Morcos
Radiopharmaceutical Research Institute, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights,
P.M.B 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
(Received October 29, 2007)
The preparation of the OASIS®-HLB sorbent based solid phase extraction (SPE) resins and their application for the 177 Lu radioisotope separation were investigated Di-(2-ethylhexyl) orthophosphoric acid (HDEHP) impregnated OASIS-HLB sorbent based SPE resins (OASIS-HDEHP) were successfully developed from this investigation The wettable porosity structure of the moderately extractant impregnated OASIS-HDEHP resins is favorable for the effective diffusion of polar and ionic solutes giving good separation performance Its good wetting ability offers ease of packing into conventional chromatographic columns Their off-gassing-free operation makes OASIS-HDEHP columns good for long term use with highly consistent elution dynamics (several dozens of separations perfectly achievable on the same column) The simple method for the capacity factor
(k’) evaluation was developed to facilitate the characterization of the SPE chromatographic resin column A competent procedure using
OASIS-E30RS resin (one member of the OASIS-HDEHP resin group) for the separation of no-carrier added (n.c.a) 177 Lu from the bulk amount of Yb target was developed This separation procedure has showed very good performance with several prominent advantages such as the much shorter separation time (5–6 hours) and high reproducibility Its high adsorption capacity for Yb and Lu makes it ideal for the separation of the bulky sample (50 mg Yb target for the 20 g weight resin column) for the production of the several Ci of 177 Lu radioactivity
Introduction
Among the column packing materials used for solid
phase extraction (SPE) chromatography the extractant
(liquid organic extractant and/or a liquid ion-exchanger
of high molecular weight) coated inert sorbent based
SPE resins are widely used for the inorganic solute
separation These resins have been recently used for
radiochemical separations in radioisotope production
processes Normally, these SPE resins are useful in
reverse phase chromatography which requires a polar
liquid mobile phase for the elution A hydrophobic inert
substrate is currently used to form the SPE resin with a
relevant less hydrophilic extractant This has caused
non-wetting and off-gassing problems during the
column packing and running, respectively The
non-wetting property of this SPE resin type is unfavorable
for the diffusion of polar and ionic solutes to be
separated, so the column separation performance will be
seriously affected Even if the hydrophilic inert substrate
is alternatively used, the non-wetting problem will also
increase if an improper process of the extractant
impregnation is applied If the strongly hydrophilic inert
sorbent is to be applied for SPE resin preparation, then
longer elution times will be experienced due to the
unwanted side effect of strong polar-polar interaction
between the sorbent and polar (or ionic) solutes in
reverse phase chromatography For example the US
patent based separation process using the strongly polar
Amberchrom CG-71 sorbent based LN resin (Eichrom
Technologies) and HCl acid eluent for the separation of
* E-mail: slv@ansto.gov.au
n.c.a 177Lu radioisotope from 5 mg Yb target took around 12 hours.8,9
Logically, an inert substrate rendering a hydrophilic-hydrophobic balanced property will be preferable to overcome the strong interaction and long retention time problems mentioned above Among such expected inert substrates, the OASIS®-HLB sorbent (a hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced co-polymer) was the first choice for preparation of the SPE resin The OASIS ®HLB sorbent
is a macroporous copolymer made from a balanced ratio
of two monomers, the lipophilic divinylbenzene and hydrophilic N-vinylpyrrolidone It provides reverse-phase capability with a special “polar-hook” for enhanced capture of polar solutes and excellent wetting ability.15 This sorbent has the unique capabilities of remaining wetted with water and retaining a wide spectrum of non-polar organic extractant and several liquid ion-exchangers which are used as stationary phase for SPE chromatography Wetting with water into porosity structure of OASIS-HLB sorbent particle is an advantageous feature to facilitate the diffusion process
of polar and ionic solutes during elution with aqueous mobile phase
In this paper the preparation of the OASIS®-HLB sorbent based SPE resins and their application for the
177Lu radioisotope separation are reported The HDEHP impregnated OASIS-HLB sorbent based SPE resins (OASIS-HDEHP) were prepared and their adsorption properties and chromatographic performance are investigated
Trang 2The basic retention calculation method for SPE
chromatography is also refined to formulate the
generalized equations matching the specific
requirements of the SPE resin development and
application for chromatographic separation
To demonstrate the prominent performance
regarding the predictable chromatographic properties of
OASIS-HDEHP resins, the column separation of n.c.a
177Lu radioisotope from the bulk ytterbium target was
performed The separation of trace level radioactive
impurities from the 176Lu (n,γ)177Lu reaction produced
177Lu solution is well within the capabilities of the
OASIS-HDEHP resin columns.14 The separation of the
bulk Yb target can also be carried out with Eichchrom’s
LN resin (the Amberchrom CG-71 resin substrate
impregnated with HDEHP), however, the performance
of LN resin columns may be affected by the strong
polarity of the acrylic ester based inert resin substrate
leading to long elution times due to the stronger
adsorption of the Yb–Lu pair.8–11 The hydrophilic
Oasis-HLB sorbent based OASIS-HDEHP resin
reported here has surpassed the shortcomings of the LN
resin mentioned above
Experimental
Reagent and material
The commercially available OASIS®-HLB resin
(WATERS’s sample extraction products) with average
particle size of 54.4 µm, pore diameter of 86.0 Å,
specific surface area of 813.0 m2/g15 and
di-(2-ethylhexyl)orthophosphoric acid (97%, BDH) were used
for our di-(2-ethylhexyl)orthophosphoric acid (HDEHP)
impregnated OASIS-HLB sorbent based SPE resins’
(OASIS-HDEHP) preparation The analytical grade
hydrochloric acid, HPLC grade methyl alcohol and
Milli-Q purified water were used for the whole
experimental process The isotopically enriched
176Y2O3 and 176Lu2O3 targets for neutron activation
were purchased from Trace-Sciences International Inc.,
USA.13 The 176Y2O3 target isotopic compositions were
176Yb (97.6%), 174Yb (1.93%), 173Yb (0.18%), 172Yb
(0.22%), 171Yb (0.07%), 170Yb (<0.01%) and 168Yb
(<0.01%) The main lanthanide impurities of this target
were Er (50 ppm), Tm (50 ppm) and Lu (50 ppm)
Apparatus, radioactivity and radionuclide calibration
The radioactivity of the different radioisotopes was
calibrated using a Capintec dose calibrator
Radioactivity measurement and radionuclide
identification were carried out using an Ortec
gamma-ray spectrometer coupled with HpGe detector The
gamma-ray energy and radioactivity calibration of this
analyzer system was performed using a standard 152Eu
radioisotope solution
Radioactive solutions
The radioactive 177Lu+175Yb solutions were obtained by the reactor thermal neutron irradiation of
176Yb2O3 A quartz ampoule containing adequate amount of 176Yb2O3 target was irradiated with the 5.1013 n.cm–2.s–1 thermal neutron flux of the High Flux Australian reactor (HIFAR) for 10 days A 24-hour cooling period was needed to let all 177Yb (T1/2=1.91 hours) radionuclide, which formed via 176Yb(n,γ)177Yb,
to be transformed to 177Lu via beta-particle decay The irradiated target was then dissolved in about 10 ml 6M HCl solution, added with some drops of H2O2 (30%) solution with gentle heating on the hot plate Then the target solution underwent several cycles of the dry evaporation – water added reconstitution Finally the target solution was obtained by constituting with 2 ml 0.1M HCl solution An aliquot of some microliter volume was taken out from the target solution for gamma-ray spectrometry regarding the determination of target radioactivity and radiochemical separation yield The convenient assessment of the 175Yb isotopic decontamination factor and the Yb element content in
177Lu eluate fractions could be made using data collected from gamma-ray spectrometry measurement of the above mentioned target sample and that of different column elution fractions Due to the 174Yb(n,γ)175Yb reaction induced from the 174Yb nuclide content (1.93%) in the 176Yb target, the significant amount of
175Yb radioisotope produced along with 177Lu will be useful for the spiking purpose to track the elution profile
of the remaining macro-quantity of non-radioactive Yb target
Preparation of the OASIS-HDEHP resins
Appropriate amount of dry OASIS®HLB resin was measured into a glass beaker and soaked in the given amount of methyl alcohol containing a relevant amount
of HDEHP extractant The mixture was shaken in an ultrasonic water bath with vacuum application for 20 minutes and then evaporated to dryness in a RotaVapor® system The rotation speed of 50–70 rpm and the heating bath temperature of 40 °C were applied A given amount
of the methyl alcohol/ethyl alcohol mixture (volume ratio 2:1) was added to the dried resin to form a pasty consistency followed by drying The drying process continued until a final resin product of free flowing form was obtained
Density measurements
The weight density of resin, ρRe was determined by standard methods using the volume-metric flask at
20 °C The weight density of resin column, ρc was determined with a given dry resin weight packed into a
Trang 3graduated chromatographic column eluted with the
eluent pressure difference of 660 mm Hg (equivalent to
8.8 m H2O column height) The ρc value was calculated
from the weight of the dry resin packed and the resin
bed volume in the graduated column
Investigation of the solute sorption
and SPE chromatographic separation
Determination of the weight distribution coefficient,
D Re.W , Lu and Yb sorption as a function of the HCl
eluent solution molarity: Four types of OASIS-HDEHP
resins were investigated:
OASIS-E16RS: OASIS-HDEHP resin containing
16.0% HDEHP (w/w)
OASIS-E30RS: OASIS-HDEHP resin containing
30.0% HDEHP (w/w)
OASIS-E36RS: OASIS-HDEHP resin containing
36.0% HDEHP (w/w)
OASIS-E41RS: OASIS-HDEHP resin containing
41.0% HDEHP (w/w)
Six vials containing 15 ml HCl solution each (1.0M,
2.0M, 3.0M, 4.5M, 6.0M and 7.5M), itself containing
the mixture of 0.5 mg Yb + 2.0 µg Lu spiked with
radioactive 175Yb and 177Lu radioisotopes were used
Then 50 mg portions of each resin were weighed into
each prepared solution vial The vials were shaken in an
ultrasonic bath with vacuum application for 20 minutes
and then shaken in a thermostat water bath at 20 °C
overnight The radioactivity of the resin and solution
were measured and the distribution coefficient was
calculated This D Re.W measurement process with the
use of the dry and wet OASIS-HDEHP resins is shown
in Fig 1
D Re.W value is calculated from the collected data as follows:
⎟⎟
⎞
⎜⎜
=
v
a W
V v a A
D W ( sol / ) / sol
Re
0
Re
where WRe is the resin weight (gram), A0 is the total
amount of the element in the investigated system; V is
the volume of solution in the investigated system (ml),
Vsr is the resin slurry volume (ml), ρsr is the resin slurry weight density
A plot of D Re.W vs eluent solution concentration can
be set up by taking into account the eluent dilution effect
of slurry resin addition with an eluent dilution factor of
(V1/V) In the case of the investigation with the dry
resin, no eluent dilution effect will be taken into account
Determination of the volume distribution coefficient, D Re.V
Lu and Yb sorption as a function of HCl eluent solution: D Re.V is measured from the column elution
profile (the chromatogram at the column outlet)
The D Re.V value is calculated from the elution profile
as follows:
Re Re
.
V V
V V
D V = R− m = Correct
where V m is the total free volume of the column from the top of the resin column to the point at which the solution
leaves the column (ml), VRe is the volume of the resin in
the column (ml), V R is the total volume (including total free volume) of solution corresponding to the top of the peak of respective solute (ml)
Fig 1 Measurement process of D Re.W
Trang 4The conversion of the resin volume distribution
coefficient D Re.V to the resin weight distribution
coefficient D Re.W: The weight densities used for the
equation formulation are the followings: ρC is the
weight density of column bed (weight of dry resin per
unit volume of column bed, g/ml), ρRe is the weight
density of the resin (weight of dry resin per unit resin
volume, g/ml)
The resin weight distribution coefficient is:
g
ml , phase) liquid the of liliter amount/mil
(Solute
resin) dry the of m amount/gra
(Solute
Re
=
=
W
D
g
ml ,
Re 0
Re
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟
⎞
⎜⎜
=
V A W
A A D
s
s W
The resin volume distribution coefficient is:
ml
ml , phase) liquid the of liliter amount/mil
(Solute
resin) dry the of liliter amount/mil
(Solute
Re
=
=
V D
ml
ml , Re 0
Re
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟
⎞
⎜⎜
=
V A V
A A D
s
s V
The conversion equation of the different distribution
coefficients is the following:
Re
Re Re
Re 0
Re Re
0 Re
0
Re
1
ρ ρ
ρ
V sol
sol
sol
sol sol
sol W
D V
A V
A A
V A V A A
V A W A A D
=
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
=
=
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
=
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
=
W
The conversion between the D Re.V and the extractant
volume distribution coefficient (D Ext.V) calculated from
the ρExt weight density, as reported in the literature,1,2,7
does not seem necessary D Ext.V seems to be an apparent
parameter unspecified for the property of the pure
extractant due to the possible variation in the weight
density resulted from the interaction between the
extractant and sorbent substrate on the resin pore
surface
Method for the SPE resin column retention factor (k’) assessment: Based on the basic concept of
chromatography, the column retention factor (k’) is
defined as follows:
phase) mobile the in solute of (amount
phase) stationary the
in solute of (amount
’=
k
V m
D V
V
k’= Re⋅ Re. (2)
where V m is the mobile phase volume in the packed
column, VRe is the stationary phase volume in the
packed column (the SPE resin dry volume), D ReV is the resin volume based volume distribution coefficient For the column packed with dry resin of the weight
of WRe, the VRe value will be:
Re
Re
W
V =
If the column is packed with wet resin, the column
bed volume V C and column bed density ρc , the VRe
value will be:
Re Re
Re
ρ
V W
=
=
With the column bed volume
C
V
ρRe
= and the dry
resin volume
Re
Re
Re ρ
W
V = , the mobile phase volume will
be:
) 1 1 (
Re
Re Re Re Re
−
=
C C
C
Re Re
V
C
C
⋅
−
=
ρ ρ
ρ ρ
From the above equations the following volume ratio can be set up:
) (
) (
) (
Re Re
Re Re Re
Re Re
C C C
C
W V
V
ρ ρ ρ ρ
ρ
ρ
⋅
−
The resin column retention factor (k’) can be now
calculated by putting Eq (3) into Eq (2):
V C
C V
m
D D
V
V
Re
Re
Re
) (
−
=
⋅
=
ρ ρ ρ With the conversion factor:
)
C V
C
ρ ρ
ρ
−
=
Trang 5the above equation will be simplified as follows:
V
C
With the conversion between D Re.V and D Re.W as
shown in Eq (1), the following equation can be
achieved:
W C
Re
Re
) (
−
⋅
=
ρ ρ
ρ ρ
This is a simple equation for calculation of k’ value
from only two physical constants (ρc and ρRe) and
D Re.W value By giving a conversion factor:
) ( Re
Re
C
C W
C
ρ ρ
ρ ρ
−
⋅
=
the above equation will be simplified as follows:
W
C
It should be mentioned that the conversion Eqs (4)
and (5) do not contain the extractant weight density
(ρExt) which was applied in some recent
publications.1,2,7 The elimination of the role of the ρExt
parameter from the above equations implied to describe
the sorption and chromatographic properties of the
newly formed SPE resin not related to its components
(pure extractant and inert sorbent substrate)
Separation factor assessment: The separation factor
(α) calculation was performed as follows:
) Yb (
) Lu ( )
Yb ( Re
) Lu ( Re ) Yb (
Re
) Lu (
Re
Corrected
Corrected V
V W
W
V
V D
D D
D
=
=
=
α
For practical application, the SPE column containing
10 g OASIS-HDEHP resin was used The retention
factor (k’) or retention volumes and the separation factor
(α) for the separation of Lu and Yb ions were calculated
177 Lu separation processes: OASIS-HDEHP resin containing 30% HDEHP in weight was used for the Yb–
177Lu separation This resin (OASIS-E30RS) is useful for Lu–Yb ion separation and was prepared as follows: For 45.0 g OASIS- E30RS resin preparation, 31.5 g OASIS®-HLB resin was put into a 1 liter glass beaker together with 50 ml methyl alcohol 13.5 g di-(2-ethylhexyl) orthophosphoric acid diluted in 30 ml methyl alcohol was added to the beaker The mixture was shaken in ultrasonic water bath with vacuum application for 20 minutes and then let to evaporate the mixture to dryness in a RotaVapor® system Rotation speed of 50–70 rpm and the heating bath temperature of
40 °C were applied A 2:1 ratio methyl alcohol/ethyl alcohol (30 ml) was added to the dried resin to form a pasty consistency and the drying process was continued until a final resin product of free flowing form was obtained
The glass columns loaded with 5.0–25.0 g OASIS-E30RS resin were used The column loading procedure was applied as follows After soaking the required amount of OASIS-E30RS resin with 0.1M HCl solution
in a glass vial the degassing and wetting of resin was performed by shaking the vial in an ultrasonic water bath for 10 minutes with vacuum application The degassed and well-wetted resin was then packed to the above mentioned columns A peristaltic vacuum pump applied on the outlet of the column was used for eluant delivery The columns were then flushed with 6M HCl solution and reconditioned with 0.1M HCl solution and put into use at any time The separation process flow chart is shown in Fig 2
Fig 2 No-carrier added 177 Lu separation from the bulk amount of 176 Yb2O3 target
Trang 6The on-line recording of the radio-chromatogram
during the column elution process was achieved by
monitoring the 175Yb+177Lu radioactivity using a
NaI(Tl) crystal scintillation detector coupled to the
LAURA computer software supported radioactivity
counter
Results and discussion
Preparation of the OASIS-HDEHP resins
As shown in Table 1 and Fig 3, coating degrees of
up to 40% HDEHP content in the resin ensured that the
extractant did not break into the mobile phase of
variable acidity The OASIS-HDEHP resin with
impregnating extent higher than 35% became poorly
wettable in the HCl solution of acidity higher than 4.5M
The poor wettability property is assumed to result from
the fully filling of the resin pores with extractant This
fully filling phenomenon not only damages the
wettability of the resin but also decreases the diffusion
kinetics of the solutes in the separation process This
fact has led us to the choice of the extractant moderately
impregnated OASIS-HDEHP resins with impregnating extent lower than 40% in our further investigations All these resins are of free flowing form, wettable and easy to pack into the column To get the best column operation performance, these resins should be gassed off by ultrasonic shaking combined with vacuum application
These resins have very good stability More than 30 Yb/Lu separations were performed on the same OASIS-E30RS resin column without any performance degradations
Distribution coefficients and separation factor
The results of weight distribution coefficient (D Re.W) measurement for Yb3+ and Lu3+ ions in the HCl solutions are shown in Figs 4 and 5 The fact that
increasing D Re.W values for the resins of higher HDEHP contents make the resins of HDEHP contents lower than 30% favorable for the column chromatographic
separation These resins showed the D Re.W values at around lower than 75 for Lu 3+ and 50 for Yb3+ ions in the HCl solution acidities between 2M and 6M
Table 1 Preparation of different HDEHP coated SPE resins
OASIS-HDEHP resins OASIS-E16RS OASIS-E30RS OASIS-E36RS OASIS-E40RS HDEHP weight (g) in 50 ml methanol 6.00 13.50 8.86 11.88
OASIS®-HLB resin weight (mg) 31.50 31.50 15.75 15.75
HDEHP content in the coated resin (%)* 16.00 30.00 36.00 41.20
* After conditioning with 1000 ml water per gram coated resin
** Compared to total HDEHP amount used for coating
Fig 3 HDEHP content in the coated OASIS-HDEHP resin vs that in the reaction mixture A: calculated; B: experimental
Trang 7Fig 4 Weight distribution coefficient of Yb (D Re.W-Yb) vs HCl solution acidity for OASIS-HDEHP resin coated with variable HDEHP content
Fig 5 Weight distribution coefficient of Lu (D Re.W-Lu) vs HCl solution acidity for OASIS-HDEHP resin coated with variable HDEHP content
Trang 8Regarding the separation capability of resin, the
achievable separation factor (α) should be as high as
possible The separation factor values presented in Fig
6, which were calculated from the data of Figs 4 and 5,
have showed that the resins of HDEHP contents higher
than 25% offer the best Yb/Lu separation capability with
the HCl solution eluents of concentrations lower than
3.0M It is obvious that the choice of OASIS-E30RS
resin (30% HDEHP content) for the Lu3+/Yb3+ ion pair
separation was confirmed with a separation factor of 1.6
achieved in 3.0M HCl solution as shown in Fig 6
Assessment of capacity factor (k’) and corrected
retention volume (V’ R ) for lutetium and ytterbium
separation using the HDEHP coated
resin OASIS-E30RS
The k’ value calculation is based on two physical
constants (ρc, ρRe) and the weight distribution
coefficient (D Re.W ) The disappearance of the s (%)
coating percentage parameter and the ρExt extractant
weight density from the k’ equation implies that the
effect of the s (%) and ρExt parameters is covered by the
presence of ρc and ρRe parameters The calculated
results using the above equation are listed in Table 2
Due to the possible interaction between sorbent substrate
surface and coated extractant in the SPE resin, the effort
to use the ρExt parameter for the conversion between the
D Re.W parameter and the D Ext.V (the extractant volume distribution coefficient) does not seem useful and
convincible This conversion makes the k’ factor
determination confused To avoid the use of the
physically meaningless D Ext.V parameter non-specified for extractant volume coated in the SPE resin, the resin
volume distribution coefficient, D Re.V (related to the extractant impregnated SPE resin volume) was used for
the k’ factor calculations in our present report This has brought about a more simple equation for k’ factor
assessment and its determination method was compared
to that mentioned in the recent literature.1,2,7
Additionally, the D Re.V parameter can be determined based on the elution profile and the resin weight in the column So the equations (1), (4) and (5) mentioned above, seem more convenient to be used for the practical SPE chromatography
The k’ factor and corrected V’ R retention volume calculation results for OASIS-E30RS resin column are shown in Table 2 and Fig 7 It is obvious that the elution volume of some hundred millilitres from the 10 g weight OASIS-E30RS resin column is quite practical for performing a separation process for the Lu3+/Yb3+ ion pair
Fig 6 Separation factor for Lu–Yb separation vs HCl solution acidity and the HDEHP content of the OASIS-HDEHP resins
Trang 9Table 2 Physical constants of HDEHP coated resin and the results of the C V and C W of conversion factor calculations
Extractant coating percentage, s (%) (40.00) (40.00) (40.00) 30.00
Resin column bed density, ρc (g/ ml)
Extractant coated resin density, ρ Re (g/ml)
(0.38) (1.15)
(0.37) (1.13)
(0.39) (1.13)
0.40 1.16 )
( Re
Re
C
C W
C
ρ
ρρ −ρ
⋅
W
C
k’ = ⋅ Re. 0 567 ⋅DRe.W 0 55 ⋅DRe.W 0 595 ⋅DRe.W 0 61 ⋅DRe.W
)
C V
C
ρ ρ
ρ
−
V
C
k’ = ⋅ Re. 0 493 ⋅DRe.V 0 48 ⋅DRe.V 0 527 ⋅DRe.W 0 52 ⋅DRe.V
* Data in parentheses are from References 1, 2 and 7 used for identification of the calculation method
Fig 7 Retention factor (k’) and corrected retention volume (V’R) vs HCl eluent acidity for the Yb 3+ /Lu 3+ ion pair separation using the HDEHP
coated OASIS-LHB resin (OASIS-E30RS), OASIS-E30RS resin weight: 10 g; column: 31.8 length × 1.0 cm i.d; Vm = 11.5 ml
Lu 3+ /Yb 3+ ion pair separation
To perform a successful separation, the amount of
solute loaded on the resin column was chosen to
correspond to around 5% of the maximal adsorption
capacity of the resin column In the case of
OASIS-E30RS resin the maximal adsorption capacity is
supposed to equal to the amount of exchangeable H+
ions present in the HDEHP molecule Based on the
chemical formula of HDEHP:
[CH3(CH2)3CH(C2H5)CH2O]2P(O)OH
it is shown that HDEHP contains one exchangeable H+
in each molecule So its ion-exchange capacity could be
of 3.1 meq H+/g HDEHP
One gram OASIS-E30RS resin contains 300 mg
HDEHP So the ion-exchange capacity of
OASIS-E30RS resin will be 0.93 meq H+/g resin The average
gram equivalent of [Yb3++Lu3+] is 58 mg
[Yb+Lu]/meq So, one gram weight resin column of 5%
Yb + Lu solute loading as mentioned above can be loaded with 0.93 (meq/g resin)×5%×58=2.7 mg [Yb3++Lu3+]/g resin
Based on the k’ factor and loading calculation results
achieved above the separations of micro-quantities of
Lu3+ ions from the 30 mg and 50 mg Yb targets using the 10 g and 20 g weight resin columns, respectively, were performed These separation results are shown in Fig 8 Unsuccessful separations shown in Figs 8a and 8b were experienced due to incorrect elution conditions such as the inadequate resin bed and the un-optimized eluent concentration and elution scheme The good separations shown in Figs 8c–8e confirmed our predictions, the results of which lay in the above
mentioned calculations related to the capacity factor, k’,
the separation factor, α, and the solute loading on the resin column The good separation performance and the significantly shorter elution time (from 4 to 6 hours for the 50 mg Yb loading) compared to the separations basing on the LN resin (12 hours for the 10 mg Yb
Trang 10loading) reported in the References 8–11 make the
HDEHP coated OASIS-LHB resin (OASIS-E30RS)
favorable for the separation of the bulk Yb amount from
the trace quantity of Lu This capability of
OASIS-E30RS resin offers a useful way of separation of
no-carrier added 177Lu radioisotope from the larger amount
of Yb target As for the separation performance the tailing was shown from the Yb elution peak This unfavorable characteristic was assumed to be the result
of larger particle size (54.4 µm) resin.15 The tailing problem will be solved by using the OASIS-LHB resin
of smaller particle size (30 µm)
Fig 8 Elution profiles of Lu3+ and Yb 3+ ions achieved on the OASIS-E30RS resin columns of variable weights; (a) resin weight: 5 g; column: 15.9 cm length × 1.0 cm i.d; Vm = 5.7 ml eluent: 3.0M HCl, flow rate: 1.0 ml/min, solute composition: 30 mg Yb + 1 µg Lu; (b) resin weight: 10 g; column: 31.8 cm length × 1.0 cm i.d; Vm = 11.5 ml; eluent: 2.75M HCl (0–100 min); 3.0M HCl (100–250 min); flow rate: 1.3 ml/min; solute composition: 30 mg Yb + 1 µg Lu; (c) resin weight: 10 g; column: 31.8 cm length × 1.0 cm i.d; Vm = 11.5 ml; eluent: 2.75M HCl (0–80 min.); 3.0M HCl (80–150 min); 6M HCl (150–220 min); flow rate: 1.3 ml/min; solute composition: 30 mg Yb + 1 µg Lu.; (d) resin weight: 20 g; column: 28.5 cm length × 1.5 cm i.d; Vm = 23.0 ml; eluent: 2.75M HCl (0–90 min); 3.0M HCl (90–160 min); 6M HCl (160–220 min); flow rate: 2.5 ml/min; solute composition: 50 mg Yb + 1 µg Lu; (e) resin weight: 25 g; column: 35.5 cm length × 1.5 cm i.d; Vm = 28.8 ml; eluent: 2.75M HCl (0–
150 min); 3.0M HCl (150–300 min); 6M HCl (300–370 min); flow rate: 2.5 ml/min; solute composition: 50 mg Yb target+ no-carrier added 177 Lu