INTRODUCTION Triclosan I Irgasan DP-300 ©, 2,4,4'-trichloro-2'-hydroxydiphenylether Ciba-Geigy, Greensboro, NC is a commonly used bacteriostat in deodorant sticks and soaps.. was used f
Trang 1HPLC analysis of some bacteriostats in deodorant
sticks and soaps
RAJA G ACHARI and DAVID CHIN, Research & Development
Center, Bristol- Myers Products Division, 225 Long Avenue, Hillside,
NJ 07207
Received February 5, 1981
Synopsis
A stability-indicating HPLC method for the determination of some bacteriostats such as Triclosan (2,4,4'-trichloro-2'-hydroxydiphenylether) and TCC (3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide) is described The liquid chromatographic separation is carried out using a •Bondapak Alkylphenyl column and the mobile phase consisting of 1:1 (V/V) acetonitrile:water The method had been documented to be precise and accurate and has been successfully applied in assaying commercially available deodorant sticks and soap samples
INTRODUCTION
Triclosan (I) (Irgasan DP-300 ©, 2,4,4'-trichloro-2'-hydroxydiphenylether) (Ciba-Geigy, Greensboro, NC) is a commonly used bacteriostat in deodorant sticks and soaps TCC (II) (Monsanto, St Louis, MO) (3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide) is mainly used in deodorant soaps Various methods have been reported for the analysis of these bacteriostats in
deodorants, but all of these methods suffer from certain drawbacks Perfumes, other
UV absorbing substances, or chemical breakdown products of the bacteriostats often interfere with ultraviolet and colorimetric methods (1,2) The gas chromatographic procedure of Demars and Yates (3) for the analysis of TCC is cumbersome and non-specific because the amines which are ultimately analyzed are also the probable chemical degradation products of TCC One of the two reported HPLC procedures requires a gradient elution system (4) and the second requires a radial compression separation system (5) Both of the above systems are neither suitable nor available in all laboratories for routine analysis; moreover, neither of the above HPLC methods has been tested to determine whether it is "stability-indicating" due to the chemical degradation of the bacteriostats in the finished products
The present study is aimed at developing a stability-indicating simple isocratic HPLC method for assaying triclosan in deodorant sticks and TCC in deodorant soaps Chromatographic parameters have been provided to assay both triclosan and TCC should these be present in combination The chemical structures of triclosan and TCC
are shown below
163
Trang 2164 jOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
METHOD
APPARATUS
A modular liquid chromatographic unit consisting of a constant flow solvent delivery pump (Model 6000A, Waters Assoc., Milford, MA), a continuously variable UV-VIS spectroflow monitor with a capability of programming to read absorbance of an eluate
at several wavelengths simultaneously, and of obtaining an absorbance spectrum between desired wavelengths (Model LC-75, Auto Control, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT), a digital recorder (Model 56, Perkin-Elmer Corp.) and an integration device (Model SP-4000, Spectra-Physics, Santa Clara, CA) to calculate the area under the curve of the eluates, was used for chromatography
An alkylphenylsiloxane bonded column (•Bondapak Alkylphenyl, Waters Assoc.) was used for the separation of the bacteriostats with a mobile phase containing 1:1 (V/V) acetonitrile:water (HPLC grade, Baker Chemical Co., Phillipsburg, NJ) The bacterio-
stats were monitored at 280 nm
STANDARD SOLUTIONS
Appropriate amounts of triclosan and TCC were dissolved in methanol (HPLC grade, Baker Chemical Co.) and the appropriate aliquots of the solutions were further diluted using the mobile phase or 1:1 (V/V) methanol:water to yield a concentration range of
25 •tg/ml-75 •tg/ml for triclosan, and 6 •tg/ml-24 •tg/ml for TCC, respectively
SAMPLE PREPARATION
A Deodorant Sticks
Approximately 1 g of the deodorant stick was accurately weighed into a 50-ml volumetric flask 5 ml of methanol was added and the deodorant was dissolved by applying gentle heat on a hot plate 25 ml of 1:1 (V/V) acetontrile:water was added The solution gelled It was warmed until dissolved and diluted to volume with additional 1:1 acetonitrile:water The solution was cooled to room temperature and the volume was adjusted to mark if needed The solution was mixed thoroughly and approximately 15 ml of the above solution was transferred into a stoppered centrifuge tube and placed in a methanol-ice bath for 30 min The solution was centrifuged while cold to separate a clear supernatant from a small amount of gel which did not contain any bacteriostat The supernatant was transferred to a sample vial and this solution was used for chromatography
Trang 3B Deodorant Soaps
Approximately 1 g of soap was accurately weighed and transferred into a 50-ml volumetric flask 10 ml of methanol was added and the soap was dissolved with gentle heating The solution was diluted to volume with methanol 5 ml of the methanolic solution was transferred to a 100-ml flask and brought to volume with 1:1 (V/V) methanol:water The solution was thoroughly mixed and an appropriate amount of the solution was transferred to a stoppered centrifuge tube The tube was cooled in a methanol-ice bath for 30 min and centrifuged while cold and the clear supernatant was transferred into a sample vial This solution was used for chromatography
C Chemical degradation of bacteriostats for "stability indicating" testing
Several chemical degradation studies of the individual bacteriostats and the deodorant samples (containing bacteriostats) were carried out The following tests were performed: 1) effect of acid; 2) effect of alkali; 3) effect of oxidation; 4) effect of heat; and 5) effect of UV irradiation
Triclosan and TCC and the deodorants were dissolved in methanol and to the
methanolic solution acid (HC1), base (NaOH), oxidizing agent (Potassium monoper- sulphate, Oxone ©) were added, respectively An aliquot of each of these solutions was transferred into an ampule and sealed The ampules were heated at 40øC for 24-48 h For UV irradiation the methanolic solution was applied on a clear glass plate and the solvent was evaporated in vacuum The process was repeated several times to ensure that sufficient amounts of the sample had been added onto the glass plate One half the glass plate was covered with aluminum foil to serve as a control and the other half was exposed to UV light This was accomplished by placing a mercury lamp (Model //GE, G15T8) about 6 in above the glass plate In addition, methanolic solutions of triclosan and TCC in sealed ampules were also exposed to UV light
QUANTITATION
The calibration standards were injected in duplicate and a regression analysis of the drug concentration versus the area under the curve was carried out The concentration
of the bacteriostat was extrapolated from the regression curve and the percent of the bacteriostat was calculated in the following way:
C
x V x 100 = % Bacteriostat,
SIV
where C = extrapolated concentration of the bacteriostat in mg/ml,
Sir/= sample weight in mg,
V = sample volume
IDENTIFICATION OF THE BACTERIOSTATS
Initial identification of the bacteriostats was carried out by comparing the retention of
the bacteriostats with those of the authentic reference standards Further confirmation
Trang 4166 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
of the identity and purity of the chromatographic peak was effected by the absorbance ratio measurement technique which is accomplished in the following way An authentic bacteriostat standard is chromatographed and the flow of the mobile phase
is stopped approximately at the chromatographic peak maximum The instrument is programmed to measure the absorbances of the eluate at pre-selected wavelengths and the ratios of the absorbances are calculated Similarly, a sample is chromatographed and the absorbance ratios of the analytical peak are determined If the absorbance ratios of the bacteriostat in the sample compare within _+ 10% with those of the reference standard, the identity and the purity of the bacteriostat is confirmed
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Under the chromatographic conditions used, triclosan and TCC showed the chroma- tographic properties listed in Table I
Table I
Chromatographic Properties of Triclosan and TCC •
•Chromatographic conditions: •Bondapak alkyl phenyl column, 1:1 (V/V)Acetonitrile:water, mobile phase; flow rate 2 ml/min., detection wavelength 280 nm For calculation of tailing factor see Ref (6)
Both triclosan and TCC were tested for their linear detection range The data were obtained using three calibration standards and each standard was injected in duplicate
The results are summarized in Table II
Table II
Linearity Data of Triclosan and TCC •
Compound range 0tg) (counts, ng) Intercept Coefficient
•Chromatographic conditions: As in Table I For regression analysis, area under the curve was obtained in
electronic counts
Chromatograms of a reference triclosan standard and that of a deodorant stick are shown in Figure 1 The chromatogram clearly demonstrates the separation of triclosan from perfumes and other ingredients None of the deodorant sticks contained any TCC Similarly, chromatograms showing the separation of TCC are shown in Figure 2 All of the commercial deodorant soaps except one analyzed in this study contained only TCC as shown in the product label; however, both TCC and triclosan can be separated using a modified solvent system as shown in Figure 3
The precision and accuracy of the procedure were determined The within-run and between-run precisions of the chromatographic responses were determined by repli-
Trang 5Inject
A
Triclosan
B
Triclosan
Figure 1 Chromatograms of (a) reference triclosan standard, and (b) that of a deodorant stick
cate injections of reference standard solutions of triclosan and TCC in a single day, and over a period of three to four days Chromatographic response precision data are shown in Table III Data indicate that precision of the procedure is very good
Accuracy of the procedure was tested by addition of known amounts of triclosan and TCC to deodorant sticks and deodorant soaps, respectively For this study triclosan was added to a deodorant stick placebo sample, whereas TCC was added to a deodorant soap sample which was previously assayed The data are presented in Table
Trang 6168 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
Inject
A
•dTCC
Iniect
B
Figure 2 Chromatograms of (a) reference TCC standard, and (b) that of a deodorant soap
The recovery data indicate that the accuracy of the •rocedure is excellent The precision of the assay procedure was further determined by analyzing a commercial deodorant stick for triclosan and a deodorant soap for TCC For five replicate assays
the coefficient of variation for triclosan was + 3% and that for TCC was 0.38%
SPECIFICITY OF THE ASSAY PROCEDURE
Although it was established that the procedure is capable of discriminating the bacteriostats from the inactive matrix, perfumes, etc., it was necessary to show that the procedure has the capability of discriminating the bacteriostats from the degradation products of the bacteriostats and from those of the perfumes or any other ingredient
present in the deodorants
Table III
Reproducibility Data of Chromatographic Responses • Within-Run (n = 6) Between-Run (n = 4)
Retention time Area Retention Time Area
% CV 0.84 0.96 1.8 4.5
% CV 0.26 0.27 1.04 8.1
•Retention time and area are expressed in seconds and electronic counts, respectively The amounts of triclosan and TCC injected were 1.26 and 0.258/zg respectively
Trang 7Inject
TCC
Figure 3 Chromatogram of (a) deodorant soap containing TCC and triclosan Chromatographic
conditions: mobile phase, 60:30:10 (V/V), methanol:water:ethylacetate; flow rate, 1 ml/min., other
conditions as in Table I
For this purpose the bacteriostats and the deodorant samples containing bacteriostats were artificially degraded as described in the experimental section, and the degraded solutions were analyzed In each case the identity and the purity of the bacteriostats were confirmed by the absorbance ratio technique Based on the UV spectra of the
Trang 8170 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
Trang 9Table IV
Recoveries of Triclosan and TCC from Spiked Samples •
Amount Added Amount Added
(/•g/injection) % Recovered (/•g/injection) % Recovered
1.007 100.6 0.155 100.2
•AII recovery data represent an average of three determinations Range refers to recoveries from all
determinations
2Range: 99.8-101.1
3Range: 99.4-100.6
bacteriostats in the HPLC mobile phase (Figure 4), the wavelengths selected for
absorbance ratio determination were 266, 288, 300 nm for triclosan and 240, 270, 280
nm for TCC, respectively The results of the chemical degradation of TCC and
triclosan are described below:
TCC
No significant degradation was found upon heating of TCC Some degradation products were observed upon hydrolysis (acid and base) probably from p-chloroanil-
ine, 3, 4-dichloroaniline
Oxidation by potassium monopersulfate showed some degradation products However, the identity of the degradation products has not been established here Photolysis produced several degradation products The degradation products were not identified in this study but previous studies on the photolysis of TCC in methanol have indicated that a loss of chlorine from TCC occurs, confirmed by the identification of chloride ion (7) This will probably result in yielding several dechlorinated carbanilide products
In all the degradation studies carried out here no interference was rendered to the analytical peak by any degradation products as determined by the absorbance ratios
summarized in Table V
Data shown in Table V clearly demonstrate that the present procedure is stability- indicating for TCC The analytical peak identified as TCC is pure and free from interferences in samples that have been subjected to vigorous degradation conditions
of heat, acid and base hydrolysis, oxidation and photolysis TCC degradation was
observed in the latter cases
Triclosan
Similar degradation studies were carried out for triclosan and the deodorant sticks containing triclosan The absorbance ratios of the analytical peak were determined in all cases The absorbance ratios of a reference triclosan standard between 288/266 nm and 288/300 nm were 3.17 and 2.78, respectively No interference was observed in any
of these studies and the triclosan peak was found to be pure in all cases The absorbance ratios of the bacteriostat peak did not differ more than + 10% from those
of the reference standard in any of the degraded samples
Trang 10172 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
Table V
Absorbance Ratios of Reference TCC and Those of the Analytical Peak in the
Degraded Solutions of TCC and Deodorant Soaps
Absorbance Ratio
TCC Ref standard 6.28 1.55
Degraded samples
•Data from methanolic solution The UV exposure to TCC on plates resulted in complete degradation of TCC and hence no absorbance ratios of the analytical peak could be provided
Three deodorant stick samples prepared in the laboratory (A, B & C) to contain 0.25% triclosan and two samples obtained commercially (D & E) were analyzed The results
are shown in Table VI
Table VI
Assay of Triclosan in Deodorant Sticks (% W/W)
Product Triclosan
Deodrant Stick A 0.258
B 0.256
C 0.254
D 0.265
A number of deodorant soaps were analyzed for TCC The results are summarized in
Table VII
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
The procedure described above is precise, accurate and specific for both qualitative and quantitative assay of triclosan and TCC No interferences or any special difficulty have been encountered for the assay of the above bacteriostats in the commercial products we analyzed However, it must be borne in mind that the deodorant samples (stick or soaps) contain many lipophillic components, and over a period of time these components tend to be deposited in the column This could change both the nature and the efficiency of the chromatographic column Thus, one should monitor the efficiency of the column periodically, and some form of clean up procedure should be adopted to regenerate the column Also, wide varieties of perfumes are used in these products and these perfumes are composed of several components of different