Before you write another ad or speak to another candidate, it’s impor- tant to recognize that top people don’t use the same criteria when ap- plying, considering, or accepting an offer. When considering whether to apply, top people want the ad to clearly explain the challenges and growth opportunities. During the interviewing process, they want to understand real job needs and gain a sense of the leadership skills of the hiring manager. When accepting a job offer, compensation is not the primary consideration. The opportunity and challenges inherent in the job are. In order of priority, the following are the top-five crite- ria that top people use when deciding to accept an offer:
1. The job match:The best people want to do work that challenges them and allows them to grow in areas they deem important.
2. The hiring manager:Top people want to work for leaders and mentors who can help them reach their goals. The quality of
70 ➤ HIRE WITH YOUR HEAD
the manager directly relates to the quality of the people hired. As you discovered in Chapter 2, preparing a perfor- mance profile and understanding real job needs can help average managers become stronger.
3. The quality of the team:The team is a very important consider- ation for a top person. Meeting strong potential coworkers can overcome other concerns and minimize the chance of accepting a counteroffer. The best people get concerned when they meet potential coworkers who are weak inter- viewers or who don’t understand real job needs.
4. The company: A strong company with great employer brand- ing certainly makes it easier to get someone initially inter- ested, but these factors are less important when a top person makes the final decision to accept or not. Tying the actual job to some major company initiative is a great way to strengthen this link. This is called job branding.Even small or less known companies can do this.
5. The compensation package: As long as the compensation pack- age is reasonable, most top people don’t consider it the number-one criteria. Only when the comp package is very high or very low does it become the primary consideration.
Develop sourcing strategies and programs with these decision- making criteria in mind. The best people always have multiple op- portunities. When evaluating new opportunities, the decision to accept is viewed as a long-term decision based largely on the crite- ria noted earlier. As a result, they take longer to decide and they want more information. They seek the advice of friends, family, and business associates. This is different for the average candidate who is interested more in the basic job content, the compensation pack- age, and how long the commute is, not in the impact he or she can make. However, if you don’t differentiate your jobs, if the hiring manager is weak, and the overall interviewing experience is unpro- fessional, you’ll probably wind up competing on price. This is what always happens when a product or service is no different from its competitors. So if you want to find more top people, you need to differentiate your jobs and make sure that the top people you ulti- mately want to hire can find them.
adle_c03.qxd 4/26/07 9:20 AM Page 70
Talent-Centric Sourcing ➤ 71
Most advertising and sourcing programs are ineffective because they are targeting the wrong audience: those who needanother job, not those who wanta more challenging job or a long-term career. Top people will respond to compelling ads that are easy to find, espe- cially if they focus more on opportunity rather than qualifications.
Top people don’t get excited when reading a list of requirements.
Not once have I ever heard a top person say the reason he or she was accepting an offer was to get more experience doing the same type of work. Yet, that’s what most job descriptions offer. Change this if you want to start hiring more top people.
➤ Sourcing Starts by Understanding Why Top People Look
Design your sourcing programs around the needs of top people, not av- erage people. A great web site with boring jobs won’t attract great peo- ple. A sophisticated applicant tracking system that causes top people to opt-out is counterproductive. A poorly administered employee re- ferral program that targets everyone or overlooks high-potential candi- dates with a slightly different skill set is soon ignored.
It takes a great job to hire a great person. Whether you’re hiring one person or one hundred, this fact must be advertised, discussed, understood, and paraded about by everyone involved in the hiring process, especially hiring managers. It needs to be built into every system, ad, process, letter, email, and form. Hiring the best is hard enough. Make sure you’re not precluding them from even applying in the first place.
To hire the best people, you must find them and attract their at- tention with the right offer. Most sourcing efforts ignore these two concepts.
➤ The Sourcing Sweet Spot: Semi-Active and Semi-Passive Candidates
Forget the active versus passive candidate definition for a moment.
Too many managers believe that active candidates are below aver- age and all passive candidates are great. Realistically, there are some very good active candidates and some pretty bad passive candidates. By segmenting the market as shown in the following
72 ➤ HIRE WITH YOUR HEAD
and developing more targeted sourcing programs, it’s relatively easy to find the best of both:
Segmenting Candidates Based on Need for a Job
➤ Very active:These are people who need a job and are aggres- sively looking. They tend to be less discriminating and focus on short-term compensation and security issues when con- sidering a new job. This pool represents about 15 percent to 20 percent of the total employment market. They are either unemployed, or severely underemployed. The best are un- derrepresented in this pool. Traditional, boring advertising is sufficient to attract and hire this type of person.
➤ Semi-active: These are people who are fully employed but who want a better job. They look infrequently, generally on bad days or just to test the market. However, while they use job boards, they are more selective. Compelling advertis- ing and systems designed to bring these people to the top of the list is a key part of hiring them. This pool is big, about 25 percent of the employment market and it’s growing. It doesn’t take much anymore to get someone to consider leaving and start looking. This could be as simple as a boss who says something stupid, a project gone temporarily awry, or a simple inconvenience. This is the sourcing sweet spot, since the best people are overrepresented in this pool. To capture them, your ads need to be visible and you must move fast. For a corporation with limited resources, most of its efforts should be spent on sourcing people from this group.
➤ Semi-passive:These are people who want a better job and a better career. They are not actively looking, but they will accept a phone call to discuss future career opportunities.
Who you call and what you say is a critical piece of hiring people in this group. The best approach is to prequalify all candidates before you call them; this way, you restrict your calls to only top people. This saves a great deal of time. The only way to prequalify someone is if he’s been referred by someone else. Being great at getting referrals is the secret of sourcing semi-passive candidates. The
adle_c03.qxd 4/26/07 9:20 AM Page 72
Talent-Centric Sourcing ➤ 73
* Jack Welch, Winning(New York: HarperCollins, 2005).
best people are fairly represented in this pool, but it takes more effort and time to find them. This pool is big, too, about 25 percent of the employee market, and it’s growing. Semi-passive candidates want to be found and pursued, so they’ll post their names on LinkedIn.com and somehow get their profiles listed on ZoomInfo.com. Make sure you have something compelling to offer when you call or email people in this group, or else your efforts will be fruitless.
➤ Very passive: These people don’t want another job. It takes too much effort and time to call and convince them to pur- sue your opportunity. The best people are fairly repre- sented in this pool, but it’s not worth the effort if you can find an equally strong person using a less-intense, lower- cost approach. These very passive people represent about 30 percent of the market, but it is declining in size. Every- body seems open to explore new opportunities.
In Winning,Jack Welch states:
Hiring good people is hard. Hiring great people is brutally hard. And yet nothing matters more in winning than getting the right people on the field.*
Hiring the right people is much harder if you can’t find any. It’s a lot easier when you know how they look for new opportunities.
➤ Employer Branding versus Job Branding
Sourcing the best candidates is somewhat easier if you’re an em- ployer of choice. In good economic times, fast-growing, highly visi- ble companies attract a larger share of top candidates. In slower economic times, solid, stable companies with a more secure future enjoy the spotlight. However, there is a counterbalancing effect that keeps the supply/demand of talent in relative balance. In slower economic times, the pool of semi-active and semi-passive candi- dates shrinks as these top people become reluctant to move from
74 ➤ HIRE WITH YOUR HEAD
relatively safe jobs. In good times, more good people look since there are more opportunities to explore. To get a fair share of the top talent market, all companies need to aggressively target top people, regardless of the economic cycle.
From an employer-of-choice standpoint, Google is now the star.
Microsoft is working hard to reestablish its earlier reputation.
McKinsey is still the consulting firm of choice. And the big four (De- loitte Touche Tohmatsu, PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, and Ernst
& Young) are still the first choice if you want to be a CPA. Fortunemag- azine’s “Best 100 Places to Work” helps companies attract more top people, so this certainly gives W. L. Gore, Wegmans, and Genentech a leg up. If you aren’t an employer of choice, you can do two things:
(1) try to become one, or (2) make each job you’re offering a job of choice. In my opinion, you should spend more time on the latter.