Since knowledge is “that which is lost unless deliberately maintained”, it is cultivated and used for business by members of organizations. If there is no merit in belonging to an organization, there is no point in forming one for members who possess knowledge.
Table 13 shows the merits that members of organizations (called
“employees” hereafter) usually expect from “organizations”.
On the other hand, as the conditions for offering those merits to their employees, “organizations” expect employees to possess either the knowledge necessary for their business or the ability to acquire it.
Therefore, conditions for employees to belong to organizations can be illustrated as in Table 14.
Having employees who satisfy those conditions facilitates the development of corporate enterprises, and belonging to organizations which provide these requirements gives security to employees’ lives.
Organizations consist of more than just employees. For example, the stakeholders of an organization such as stockholders, suppliers
47
Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd.vT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.Lj.dtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn
48 Knowledge Management and Risk Strategies
Table 13: Expectations of Employees from Organizations
Types of Merits Content
Providing livelihood Organizations provide employees with financial security, based on knowledge that employees possess
Providing opportunities of knowledge transfer
Organizations provide employees with opportunities for acquiring know knowledge (time, money, and
knowledge transfer systems) Providing opportunities
of knowledge usage
Organizations provide employees with opportunities for using knowledge
Table 14: Expectations of Organizations from Employees
Types of Merits Content
Practice of knowledge Employees provide organizations with knowledge necessary for business
and customers can be named as factors concerning the organization.
From the viewpoint of the organizational equilibrium theory, orga- nizations are understood to exist only when they are able to maintain relationships among these factors and remain profitable (“merits from participating in the organization” minus “contribution to the orga- nization”). This sounds reasonable enough. Each factor continues to have a relationship with the organization because it gives them some benefits. Hence, it can be deduced that the “continuance of organizations through knowledge selection” is equal to “maintenance of the (merits − contribution > 0) inequality in the process of new knowledge selection”.
Figure 17 is a simplified chart of balance in organizations. In which factor of the organization the maximum pressure is piled on in knowledge selection depends on who has taken the initiative in the decision making.
For example, if the owner (stockholder) of an organization had taken the initiative, he would prompt the organization to adjust its business so that he could secure a return on investment at a certain
Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd.vT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.Lj.dtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn
The Impact of Knowledge Selection 49
Organization Owner of the
organization
Members
Supplier Consumers
Dividends, etc.
Capital
Price
Product/service Labor
Wage Price
Material
Figure 17: Diagram of Organizational Equilibrium
rate. When there is a change in the business, its products will be changed, and the knowledge required will be different. These would be sourced inside and outside the organization. If the employees could not gain new knowledge, they would have to be replaced. The organization would need a new supplier for new products, too. The new market would bring new customers.
On the other hand, if employees showed the initiative, they would focus on the security of their jobs and the duties required of them.
It would be highly unlikely that organizations would acquire new knowledge at a speed beyond the employees’ ability to learn it. Since the owners bear the cost of training, their share of profit would be reduced. Owners of organizations that are not producing enough profit might sell their stock.
If suppliers or customers showed the initiative, they would refuse choices that supplanted existing products, by preferring their own products or ones that suited their tastes.
Wherever the pressure is, depending on who has taken the initia- tive in the organization, knowledge selection disturbs the equilibrium within the organization. It also has the impact of undermining the existing business model. Knowledge selection disrupts the continuity of organizations.
Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhd.vT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.LjvT.Bg.Jy.Lj.dtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn.Stt.010.Mssv.BKD002ac.email.ninhddtt@edu.gmail.com.vn.bkc19134.hmu.edu.vn
50 Knowledge Management and Risk Strategies