1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

Tài liệu CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 2003 (PART 12A) pdf

19 377 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Nonmedical use of drugs
Chuyên ngành Clinical Pharmacology
Thể loại Lecture notes
Năm xuất bản 2003
Định dạng
Số trang 19
Dung lượng 2,4 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Social aspects Rewards for the individual Decriminalisation and legalisation Dependence Drugs and sport Tobacco Dependence Nicotine pharmacology Effects of chronic smoking Starting and s

Trang 1

Nonmedical use of drugs

SYNOPSIS

The nonmedical use of drugs presents social problems

with important pharmacological aspects.

Social aspects

Rewards for the individual

Decriminalisation and legalisation

Dependence

Drugs and sport

Tobacco

Dependence

Nicotine pharmacology

Effects of chronic smoking

Starting and stopping use

Passive smoking

Ethyl alcohol

Pharmacology

Car driving and alcohol

Chronic consumption

Withdrawal

Pregnancy

Pharmacological deterrence

Psychodysleptics

• Experiences with psychodysleptics

• Individual substances, especially cannabis

Stimulants

• cocaine,

• amfetamines.

• methylxanthines (caffeine), ginseng, khat

Social aspects

The enormous social importance of this subject warrants discussion here

All the naturally occurring sedatives, narcotics, euphoriants, hallucinogens and excitants were discovered thousands of years ago, before the dawn of civilisation By the late Stone Age man was systematically poisoning himself The presence of poppy heads in the kitchen middens of the Swiss Lake Dwellers shows how early in his history man discovered the techniques of self-transcendence through drugs There were dope addicts long before there were farmers.1

The drives that induce a person more or less mentally healthy to resort to drugs to obtain chemical vacations from intolerable selfhood will be briefly considered here, as well as some account of the pharmacological aspects of drug dependence The dividing-line between legitimate use of drugs for social purposes and their abuse is indistinct for it

is not only a matter of which drug, but of amount of drug and of whether the effect is directed antisocially

or not 'Normal' people seem to be able to use alcohol for their occasional purposes without harm but, given the appropriate personality and/or environ-mental adversity, many may turn to it for relief and

1 Huxley A1957 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 67: 677.

Trang 2

become dependent on it, both psychologically and

physically But drug abuse is not primarily a

pharmacological problem, it is a social problem

with important pharmacological aspects

A further issue is whether a boundary can be

drawn between the therapeutic and nontherapeutic

use of a therapeutic drug and, some would argue, if

it can be drawn, should it be? The matter has been

highlighted by the use of SSRI antidepressants, e.g

fluoxetine (Prozac), not to treat depression but to

elevate mood — make a person feel 'better than

well' (see nonmedical use, below)

SOMETERMSUSED

Abuse potential of a drug is related to its capacity

to produce immediate satisfaction, which may be a

feature of the drug itself (amfetamine and heroin

give rapid effect while tricyclic antidepressants do

not) and its route of administration in descending

order: inhalation/i.v.; i.m./s.c.; oral

Drug abuse2 implies excessive (in terms of social

norms) nonmedical or social drug use

Nonmedical drug use, i.e all drug use that is not on

generally accepted medical grounds, may be a term

preferred to 'abuse' Nonmedical use means the

continuous or occasional use of drugs by individuals,

whether of their own 'free' choice or under feelings of

compulsion, to achieve their own wellbeing, or

what they conceive as their own wellbeing (see

motives below)

Drugs used for nonmedical purposes are often

divided into two groups, hard and soft

Hard drugs are those that are liable seriously to

disable the individual as a functioning member of

society by inducing severe psychological and, in the

case of cerebral depressants, physical, dependence

The group includes heroin and cocaine

Soft drugs are less dependence-producing There

2 The World Health Organization adopts the definition of the

United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Drugs (1971).

Drug abuse means the use of psychotropic substances in a

way that would 'constitute a public health and social

problem'.

may be psychological dependence, but there is little

or no physical dependence except with heavy doses

of depressants (alcohol) The group includes seda-tives and tranquillisers, amphetamines, cannabis, hallucinogens, alcohol, tobacco and caffeine This classification fails to recognise individual variation in drug use Alcohol can be used in heavy doses that are gravely disabling and induce severe physical dependence with convulsions on sudden withdrawal; i.e for the individual the drug is 'hard' But there are many people mildly psychologically dependent on it who retain their position in home and society

Hard-use where the drug is central in the user's life and soft-use where it is merely incidental, are terms of assistance in making this distinction, i.e what is classified is not the drug but the effect it has

on, or the way it is used by, the individual

Drug dependence (see p 168)

Addiction The term 'addict' or 'addiction' has not been completely abandoned in this book because it remains convenient It refers to the most severe forms

of dependence where compulsive craving dominates the subject's daily life Such cases pose problems as grave as dependence on tea-drinking is trivial But the use of the term drug dependence is welcome, because it renders irrelevant arguments about whether some drugs are addictive or merely habit-forming Nonmedical drug use has two principal forms:

• Continuous use, when there is a true dependence,

e.g opioids, alcohol, benzodiazepines

• Intermittent or occasional use to obtain a

recreational experience, e.g 'ecstasy' (tenamfetamine), LSD, cocaine, cannabis, solvents, or to relieve stress, e.g alcohol

Both uses commonly occur in the same subject, and some drugs, e.g alcohol, are used in both ways, but others, e.g 'ecstasy', LSD, cannabis, are virtually confined to the second use

Drives to nonmedical (or nonprescription) drug

use are:

• Relief of anxiety, tension and depression; escape from personal psychological problems;

detachment from harsh reality; ease of social intercourse

Trang 3

• Search for self-knowledge and for meaning in

life, including religion The cult of 'experience'

including aestheticism and artistic creation, sex

and 'genuine', 'sincere' interpersonal

relationships, to obtain a sense of 'belonging'

• Rebellion against or despair about orthodox

social values and the environment Fear of

missing something, and conformity with own

social subgroup (the young, especially)

• Fun, amusement, recreation, excitement,

curiosity (the young, especially)

Rewards for the individual

It is inherently unlikely that chemicals could be

central to a constructive culture and no convincing

support for the assertion has yet been produced

(That chemicals might be central to a destructive

culture is another matter.) Certainly, like-minded

people practising what are often illegal activities

will gather into closely knit subgroups for mutual

support, and will feel a sense of community, but that

is hardly a 'culture' Even when drug-using

sub-groups are accepted as representing a subculture, it

may be doubted if drugs are sufficiently central to

their ideology to justify using 'drug' in the title But

claims for value to the individual and to society of

drug experience must surely be tested by the

criterion of fruitfulness for both, and the judgement

of the individual concerned alone is insufficient; it

must be agreed by others The results of both legal

and illegal drug use do not give encouragement to

press for a large-scale experiment in this field

It is claimed that drugs provide mystical experience

and that this has valid religious content Mystical

experience may be defined as a combination of

feelings of unity (oneness with nature and/or God),

ineffability (experience beyond the subject's power to

express), joy (peace, sacredness), knowledge (insight

into truths of life and values, illuminations), and

transcendence (of space and time)

When such states do occur there remains the

question whether they tell us something about a

reality outside the individual or merely something

about the mind of the person having the experience

Mystical experience is not a normal dose-related

pharmacodynamic effect of any drug, its occurrence

R E W A R D S F O R T H E I N D I V I D U A L

depends on many factors such as the subject's personality, mood, environment, conditioning The drug facilitates rather than induces the experience; and drugs can facilitate unpleasant as well as pleasant experiences It is not surprising that mystical experience can occur with a wide range of drugs that alter consciousness:

I seemed at first in a state of utter blankness with a keen vision of what was going on in the room around me, but no sensation of touch I thought that

I was near death; when, suddenly, my soul became aware of God, who was manifestly dealing with me, handling me, so to speak, in an intense personal, present reality I cannot describe the ecstasy I felt.3

This experience occurred in the 19th century with chloroform; a general anaesthetic obsolete because of cardiac depression and hepatotoxicity There is no good evidence that drugs can produce experience that passes the test of results, i.e fruitfulness to the individual and to society Plainly there is a risk of the experience becoming an end in itself rather than a means of development

CONCLUSIONS

The value of nonmedical use of psychotropic drugs can be summed up thus

• For relaxation, recreation, protection from and relief of stress and anxiety; relief of depression: moderate use of some 'soft' drugs may be accepted as part of our society

• For spiritually valuable experience: justification

is extremely doubtful

• As basis for a 'culture' in the sense that drug experience (a) can be, and (b) should be central

to an individually or socially constructive way of life: a claim without validity

• For acute excitement: extremely dangerous

GENERAL PATTERN OF USE

Divisions are not rigid and they change with fashion

3 Quoted in James W (1902) Varieties of religious experience Longmans, Harlow, and many subsequent editions of this classic See also Leary T (1970) The politics of ecstasy MacGibbon and Kee, London Other editions, USA.

Trang 4

• Any age: alcohol; tobacco; mild dependence on

hypnotics and tranquillisers; occasional use of

LSD and cannabis

• Aged 16-35 years: hard-use drugs, chiefly

heroin, cocaine and amphetamines (including

'ecstasy') Surviving users tend to reduce or

relinquish heavy use as they enter middle age

• Under 16 years: volatile inhalants, e.g solvents

of glues, aerosol sprays, vaporised (by heat)

paints, 'solvent or substance' abuse,

'glue-sniffing'

• Miscellaneous: any drug or combination of

drugs reputed to alter consciousness may have a

local vogue, however brief, e.g drugs used in

parkinsonism and metered aerosols for asthma

Decriminalisation and

legalisation

The decision whether any drug is acceptable in

medical practice is made after an evaluation of its

safety in relation to its efficacy The same principle

should be used for drugs for nonmedical or social

use But the usual scientific criteria for evaluating

efficacy are hardly applicable The reasons why

people choose to use drugs for nonmedical purposes

are listed above None of them carries serious weight

if the drug is found to have serious risks to the

individuals4 or to society, with either acute or chronic

use Ordinary prudence dictates that any such risks

should be carefully defined before a decision on

legalisation is made

There is no doubt that many individuals think,

rightly or wrongly, that private use of cannabis, if

not of 'harder' drugs, is their own business and that

the law should permit this freedom The likelihood

that demand can be extinguished by education or by

threats appears to be zero The autocratic

imple-mentation of laws that are not widely accepted in the

community leads to violent crime, corruption in the

police, and alienation of reasonable people who

would otherwise be an important stabilising

influ-ence in society

4 Hazard to the individual is not a matter for the individual

alone if it also has consequences for society.

But though written laws are so often inflexible and combine what would best be separated, informal judicial discretion under present law may be per-mitting more experimentation than would recurrent legislative debate It is recognised that this untidy approach, which may be best for the time being, cannot satisfy the extravagant advocates either of licence or of repression

A suggested intermediate course for cannabis, and perhaps even for heroin, is that penalties for possession of small amounts for personal con-sumption should be removed (decriminalisation as opposed to legalisation), whilst retaining criminal penalties for suppliers Such an approach is increasingly and informally being implemented Nobody knows what would happen if the production, supply and use of the major drugs, cannabis, heroin and cocaine, were to be legalised, as tobacco and alcohol are legalised (with weak selling restrictions) There are those who, shocked by the evils of illegal trade, consider that legalisation could only make matters better The debate continues about what kinds of evils affecting the individual and society can be tolerated and how they can be balanced against each other

Dependence

Drug dependence is a state arising from repeated,

periodic or continuous administration of a drug, that results in harm to the individual and sometimes to society.The subject feels a desire, need or compulsion to continue using the drug and feels ill if abruptly deprived of

it (abstinence or withdrawal syndrome).

For discussion of abrupt withdrawal of drugs in general see page 119 Drug dependence is char-acterised by:

• Psychological dependence: the first to appear; there is emotional distress if the drug is withdrawn

• Physical dependence: accompanies psychological dependence in some cases; there is

a physical illness if the drug is withdrawn

• Tolerance

Trang 5

D E P E N D E N C E 10

PSYCHOLOGICAL DEPENDENCE

This may occur with any drug that alters

con-sciousness however bizarre, e.g muscarine (see

p 436) and to some that, in ordinary doses, do not,

e.g non-narcotic analgesics, purgatives, diuretics;

these latter provide problems of psychopathology

rather than of psychopharmacology

Psychological dependence can occur merely on a

tablet or injection, regardless of its content, as well

as to drug substances Mild dependence does not

require that a drug should have important psychic

effects; the subject's beliefs as to what it does are as

important, e.g purgative and diuretic dependence

in people obsessed with dread of obesity We are all

physically dependent on food, and some develop a

strong emotional dependence and eat too much (or

the reverse); sexual activity, with its unique mix of

arousal and relaxation, can for some become

compulsive or addictive

PHYSICAL DEPENDENCE AND

TOLERANCE

Physical dependence and tolerance imply that

adaptive changes have taken place in body tissues

so that when the drug is abruptly withdrawn these

adaptive changes are left unopposed, resulting

generally in a rebound overactivity The discovery

that the CNS employs morphine-like substances

(endomorphins, dynorphins) as neurotransmitters

offers the explanation that exogenously

admin-istered opioid may suppress endogenous

pro-duction of endorphins by a feedback mechanism

When administration of opioid is suddenly

stopped there is an immediate deficiency of

end-ogenous opioid, which thus causes the withdrawal

syndrome

Tolerance may result from a compensatory

biochemical cell response to continued exposure to

opioid In short, both physical dependence and

tolerance may follow the operation of homeostatic

adaptation to continued high occupancy of opioid

receptors Changes of similar type may occur with

GABA transmission, involving benzodiazepines

Tolerance also results from metabolic changes

(enzyme induction) and physiological/behavioural

adaptation to drug effects, e.g opioids Physical

dependence develops to a substantial degree with

cerebral depressants, but is minor or absent with excitant drugs

There is commonly cross-tolerance between drugs of similar, and sometimes even of dissimilar, chemical groups, e.g alcohol and benzodiazepines There is danger in personal experimentation; as

an American addict has succinctly put it, 'They all think they can take just one joy-pop but it's the first one that hooks you'.5

Unfortunately subjects cannot decide for them-selves that their dependence will remain mild

TYPES OF DRUG DEPENDENCE

The World Health Organization recommends that drug dependence be specified by 'type' when under detailed discussion

Morphine-type:

— psychological dependence severe

— physical dependence severe; develops quickly

— tolerance marked

— cross-tolerance with related drugs

— naloxone induces abstinence syndrome

Barbiturate-type:

— psychological dependence severe

— physical dependence very severe; develops slowly at high doses

— tolerance less marked than with morphine

— cross-tolerance with alcohol, chloral, meprobamate, glutethimide, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, etc

Amfetamine-type:

— psychological dependence severe

— physical dependence slight: psychoses occur during use

— tolerance occurs

Cannabis-type:

— psychological dependence

— physical dependence dubious (no characteristic abstinence syndrome)

— tolerance occurs

5 Maurer D W, Vogel V H 1962 Narcotics and narcotic addiction Thomas, Springfield.

Trang 6

— psychological dependence severe

— physical dependence slight

— tolerance slight (to some actions)

Alcohol-type:

— psychological dependence severe

— physical dependence with prolonged heavy use

— cross-tolerance with other sedatives

Tobacco-type:

— psychological dependence

— physical dependence

Drug mixtures: Barbiturate-amfetamine mixtures

induce a characteristic alteration of mood that does

not occur with either drug alone

— psychological dependence strong

— physical dependence occurs

— tolerance occurs

Heroin-cocaine mixtures: similar characteristics.

ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND

EFFECT

With the i.v route or inhalation much higher peak

plasma concentrations can be reached than with

oral administration This accounts for the 'kick' or

'flash' that abusers report and which many seek,

likening it to sexual orgasm or better As an addict

said 'The ultimate high is death' and it has been

reported that when hearing of someone dying of an

overdose, some addicts will seek out the vendor since

it is evident he is selling 'really good stuff'.6 Addicts

who rely on illegal sources are inevitably exposed to

being supplied diluted or even inert preparations at

high prices North American addicts who have come

to the UK believing themselves to be accustomed to

high doses of heroin have suffered acute poisoning

when given, probably for the first time, pure heroin at

an official UK drug dependence clinic

SUPPLY OF DRUGSTO ADDICTS

In the UK, supply of officially listed drugs (a range

of opioids and cocaine) for the purpose of sustaining

6 Bourne P 1976 Acute drug abuse emergencies Academic

Press, New York.

addiction is permitted under strict legal limitations Addicts must be notified by the physician to the Home Office and in the case of some opioids and cocaine, the physician requires a special licence By such procedure it is hoped to limit the expansion of the illicit market, and its accompanying crime and dangers to health, e.g from infected needles and syringes The object is to sustain young (usually) addicts, who cannot be weaned from drug use, in reasonable health until they relinquish their dependence (often over about 10 years)

When injectable drugs are prescribed there is currently no way of assessing the truth of an addict's

statement that he/she needs x mg of heroin (or other

drug), and the dose has to be assessed intuitively by the doctor This has resulted in addicts obtaining more than they need and selling it, sometimes to initiate new users The use of oral methadone or other opioid for maintenance by prescription is devised to mitigate this problem

TREATMENT OF DEPENDENCE

Withdrawal of the drug Whilst obviously

impor-tant, this is only a step on what can be a long and often disappointing journey to psychological and social rehabilitation, e.g in 'therapeutic commu-nities' A heroin addict may be given methadone as part of a gradual withdrawal programme (see p 337) for this drug has a long duration of action and blocks access of injected opioid to the opioid receptor

so that if, in a moment of weakness, the subject takes heroin, the 'kick' is blocked More acutely, the physical features associated with discontinuing high alcohol use may be alleviated by chlordiazepoxide given in decreasing doses for 4-6 days Sympathetic autonomic overactivity can be treated with a (3-adrenoceptor blocker (or clonidine) (see Abrupt withdrawal of drugs)

Maintenance and relapse Relapsed addicts who

live a fairly normal life are sometimes best treated

by supplying drugs under supervision There is no legal objection to doing this in the UK (see above) but naturally this course, which abandons hope of cure, should not be adopted until it is certain that cure is virtually impossible A less harmful drug

by a less harmful route may be substituted, e.g oral

Trang 7

methadone for i.v heroin Addicts are often

par-ticularly reluctant to abandon the i.v route, which

provides the 'immediate high' that they find, or

originally found, so desirable

Severe pain in an opioid addict presents a special

problem High-efficacy opioid may be ineffective

(tolerance) or overdose may result; low-efficacy

opioids will not only be ineffective but may induce

withdrawal symptoms, especially if they have some

antagonist effect, e.g pentazocine This leaves as

drugs of choice nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory

drugs (NSAIDs), e.g indometacin, and nefopam

(which is neither opioid nor NSAID)

Mortality

Young illicit users by i.v injection (heroin,

benzo-diazepines, amphetamine) have a high mortality

Either death follows overdose, or septicaemia,

endo-carditis, hepatitis, AIDS, gas gangrene, tetanus and

pulmonary embolism ensue from the contaminated

materials used without aseptic precautions (schemes

to provide clean equipment mitigate this) Smugglers

of illicit cocaine or heroin sometimes carry the drug

in plastic bags concealed by swallowing or in the

rectum ('body packing') Leakage of the packages,

not surprisingly, may have a fatal result.7

Escalation

A variable proportion of subjects who start with

cannabis eventually take heroin This disposition to

progress from occasional to frequent soft use of

drugs through to hard drug use, when it occurs, is

less likely to be due to pharmacological actions, than

7 A 49-year-old man became ill after an international flight.

An abdominal radiograph showed a large number of

spherical packages in his gastrointestinal tract, and

body-packing was suspected As he had not defaecated, he was

given liquid paraffin He developed ventricular fibrillation

and died Post mortem examination showed that he had

ingested more than 150 latex packets, each containing 5 g of

cocaine, making a total of almost 1 kg (lethal oral dose 1-3 g).

The liquid paraffin may have contributed to his death as the

mineral oil dissolves latex Sorbitol or lactulose with

activated charcoal should be used to remove ingested

packages, or surgery if there are signs of intoxication (Visser

L et al 1998 Do not give liquid paraffin to packers Lancet

352: 1352)

D E P E N D E N C E

to psychosocial factors, although increased sug-gestibility induced by cannabis may contribute

De-escalation also occurs as users become

disil-lusioned with drugs over about 10 years

'Designer drugs'

This unhappily chosen term means molecular mod-ifications produced in secret for profit by skilled and criminally minded chemists Manipulation of fentanyl has resulted in compounds of extraordinary potency

In 1976 a too-clever 23-year-old addict seeking to manufacture his own pethidine 'took a synthetic shortcut and injected himself with what was later with his help proved to be two closely related byproducts; one was MPTP (methylphenyltetra-hydropyridine).8,9 Three days later he developed a severe parkinsonian syndrome that responded to levodopa MPTP selectively destroys melanin-containing cells in the substantia nigra Further such cases have occurred from use of supposed synthetic heroin MPTP has since been used in experimental research on parkinsonism What the future holds for individuals and for society in this area can only

be imagined

Volatile substance abuse

Seekers of the 'self-gratifying high' also inhale any volatile substance that may affect the central nervous system These include: adhesives ('glue-sniffing'), lacquer-paint solvents, petrol, nail varnish, any pressurised aerosol and butane liquid gas (which latter especially may 'freeze' the larynx, allowing fatal inhalation of food, drink, gastric contents, or even the liquid itself to flood the lungs) Even solids, e.g paint scrapings, solid shoe polish, may

be volatilised over a fire These substances are particularly abused by the very young (school-children), no doubt largely because they are accessible at home and in ordinary shops and they cannot easily buy alcohol or 'street' drugs (although this latter may be changing as dealers target the youngest) CNS effects include confusion and

8 Williams A1984 British Medical Journal 289: 1401-1402.

9 Davis G C et al 1979 Psychiatry Research 1: 249.

Trang 8

hallucinations, ataxia, dysarthria, coma,

convul-sions, respiratory failure Liver, kidney, lung and

heart damage occur Sudden cardiac death may be

due to sensitisation of the heart to endogenous

catecholamines If the substance is put in a plastic

bag from which the user takes deep inhalations, or

is sprayed in a confined space, e.g cupboard, there

is particularly high risk

A 17-year-old boy was offered the use of a plastic

bag and a can of hair spray at a beach party The

hair spray was released into the plastic bag and the

teenager put his mouth to the open end of the bag

and inhaled he exclaimed, 'God, this stuff hits

ya fast!' He got up, ran 100 yards; and died.10

Signs of frequent volatile substance abuse

include perioral eczema and inflammation of the

upper respiratory tract

Drugs and sport

The rewards of competitive sport, both financial

and in personal and national prestige, are the

cause of determination to win at (almost) any cost

Drugs are used to enhance performance though

efficacy is largely undocumented Detection can be

difficult when the drugs or metabolites are closely

related to or identical with endogenous

sub-stances, and when the drug can be stopped well

before the event without apparent loss of efficacy,

e.g anabolic steroids (but suppression of

endogenous trophic hormones can be measured,

and can assist)

PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT

There follow illustrations of the mechanisms by

which drugs can enhance performance in various

sports; naturally, these are proscribed by the

authorities (International Olympic Committee (IOC)

Medical Commission, and the governing bodies of

individual sports)

10 Bass M 1970 Sudden sniffing death Journal of the

American Medical Association 212: 2075.

For 'strength sports' in which body weight and

brute strength are the principal determinants (weight lifting, rowing, wrestling): anabolic agents, e.g clenbuterol (B-adrenoceptor agonist), andro-stenedione, methandienone, nandrolone, stanozolol, testosterone Taken together with a high-protein diet and exercise, these increase lean body weight (muscle) but not necessarily strength It is claimed they allow more intensive training regimens (limiting cell injury in muscles) Rarely, there may

be episodes of violent behaviour, known amongst athletes as 'roid [steroid] rage'

High doses are used, with risk of liver damage (cholestatic, tumours) especially if the drug is taken long-term, which is certainly insufficient to deter 'sportsmen' They may be more inclined to take more seriously the fact that anabolic steroids suppress pituitary gonadotrophin, and so testos-terone production

Growth hormone (somatrem, somatropin) and

corticotrophin use may be combined with that of

anabolic steroids Chorionic gonadotrophin may be

taken to stimulate testosterone production (and prevent testicular atrophy) Similarly, tamoxifen (antioestrogen) may be used to attenuate some of the effects of anabolic steroids

For events in which output of energy is explosive

(100 m sprint): stimulants, e.g amphetamine, bro-mantan, carphendon, cocaine, ephedrine and caffeine (> 12 mg/1 in urine) Death has probably occured in bicycle racing (continuous hard exercise with short periods of sprint) due to hyperthermia and cardiac arrhythmia in metabolically stimulated and vaso-constricted subjects exercising maximally under a hot sun

For endurance sports to enhance the oxygen

carrying capacity of the blood (bicycling,

mar-athon running): erythropoietin, 'blood doping' (the

athlete has blood withdrawn and stored, then transfused once the deficit had been made up naturally, so raising the plasma haemoglobin above normal)

For events in which steadiness of hand is essential

(pistol, rifle shooting): B-adrenoceptor blockers Tremor

is reduced by the B2-adrenoceptor blocking effect,

as are somatic symptoms of anxiety

For events in which body pliancy is a major factor

(gymnastics): delaying puberty in child gymnasts by endocrine techniques

Trang 9

T O B A C C O 10

For weight reduction, e.g boxers, jockeys:

diuretics These are also used to flush out other

drugs in the hope of escaping detection; severe

volume depletion can cause venous thrombosis and

pulmonary embolism

Generally, owing to recognition of natural

bio-logical differences most competitive events are sex

segregated In many events men have a natural

physical biological advantage and the

(inevit-able) consequence has been that women have

been deliberately virilised (by administration of

androgens) so that they may outperform their

sisters

It seems safe to assume that anything that can be

thought up to gain advantage will be tried by

competitors eager for immediate fame Reliable

data are difficult to obtain in these areas No

doubt placebo effects are important, i.e beliefs as

to what has been taken and what effects ought to

follow

The dividing line between what is and what is

not acceptable practice is hard to draw Caffeine can

improve physical performance and illustrates the

difficulty of deciding what is 'permissible' or

'impermissible' A cup of coffee is part of a normal

diet, but some consider taking the same amount of

caffeine in a tablet, injection or suppository to be

'doping'

For any minor injuries sustained during athletic

training NSAIDs and corticosteroids (topical,

intra-articular) suppress symptoms and allow the training

to proceed maximally Their use is allowed subject to

restrictions about route of administration, but strong

opioids are disallowed Similarly, the IOC Medical

Code defines acceptable and unacceptable treatments

for relief of cough, hay fever, diarrhoea, vomiting,

pain and asthma Doctors should remember that

they may get their athlete patients into trouble with

sports authorities by inadvertent prescribing of

banned substances.11

Some of the isssues seem to be ethical rather than

medical as witness the reported competition

success of a swimmer who, it is alleged, had been

persuaded under hypnosis into the belief that he

was being pursued by a shark

Tobacco

Tobacco was introduced to Europe from South America in the 16th century Although its potential for harm was early recognised its use was taken up avidly in every society that met it Current estimates are that there are 1.1 billion smokers worldwide In

1990 there were 3 million smoking-related deaths per year, projected to rise to 8 million by 2020 (representing 12% of all deaths).12

COMPOSITION

The principal components are tar and nicotine, the amounts of which can vary greatly depending on the country in which cigarettes are sold Regulation and voluntary agreement by manufacturers aspires

to achieve a 'global cigarette' containing at most

12 mg of tar and 1 mg of nicotine

The composition of tobacco smoke is complex (about 500 compounds have been identified) and varies with the type of tobacco and the way it is smoked The chief pharmacologically active ingre-dients are nicotine (acute effects) and tars (chronic effects)

Smoke of cigars and pipes is alkaline (pH 8.5) and

nicotine is relatively un-ionised and lipid-soluble so that it is readily absorbed in the mouth Cigar and pipe smokers thus obtain nicotine without inhaling (they also have a lower death rate from lung cancer; which is caused by non-nicotine constituents)

Smoke of cigarettes is acidic (pH 5.3) and nicotine is

relatively ionised and insoluble in lipids Desired amounts are absorbed only if nicotine is taken into the lungs, where the enormous surface area for absorption compensates for the lower lipid solubility Cigarette smokers therefore inhale (and have a high rate of death from tar-induced lung cancer) The amount of nicotine absorbed from tobacco smoke varies from 90% in those who inhale to 10% in those

who do not

Tobacco smoke contains 1-5% carbon monoxide and habitual smokers have 3-7% (heavy smokers as much as 15%) of their haemoglobin as

carboxy-11 UK prescribers can find general advice in the British

National Formulary.

12 Editorial 1999 Tobacco money and medical research Nature Medicine 5:125

Trang 10

haemoglobin, which cannot carry oxygen This is

sufficient to reduce exercise capacity in patients with

angina pectoris Chronic carboxyhaemoglobinaemia

causes polycythaemia (which increases the viscosity

of the blood)

Substances carcinogenic to animals (polycyclic

hydrocarbons and nicotine-derived N-nitrosamines)

have been identified in tobacco smoke condensates

from cigarettes, cigars and pipes Polycyclic

hydro-carbons are responsible for the hepatic enzyme

induction that occurs in smokers

Tobacco dependence

Psychoanalysts have made a characteristic

con-tribution to the problem 'Getting something orally',

one asserted , 'is the first great libidinous

experience in life'; first the breast, then the bottle, then

the comforter, then food and finally the cigarette.13

Sigmund Freud, inventor of psychoanalysis, was

a lifelong tobacco addict He suggested that some

children may be victims of a 'constitutional

intensification of the erotogenic significance of the

labial region', which, if it persists, will provide a

powerful motive for smoking.14

While psychological dependence is strong and

accounts for part of the difficulty of stopping

smoking, nicotine possesses all the characteristics of

a drug of dependence and there is powerful reason

to regard nicotine addiction as a disease A report

on the subject concludes that most smokers do not

do so from choice but because they are addicted to

nicotine.15 The immediate satisfaction of smoking is

due to nicotine and also to tars, which provide

flavour Initially the factors are psychosocial;

pharma-codynamic effects are unpleasant But under the

psychosocial pressures the subject continues, learns

to limit and adjust nicotine intake, so that the

pleasant pharmacological effects of nicotine develop

13 Scott R B 1957 British Medical Journal 1: 67 1.

14 Quoted in Royal Collage of Physicians 1977 Smoking or

health Pitman, London In 1929 Freud posed for a

photograph holding a large cigar prominently 'He was

always a heavy smoker—twenty cigars a day were his usual

allowance and he tolerated abstinence from it with the

greatest difficulty' Jones E 1953 Sigmund Freud: life and

work Hogarth Press, London.

and tolerance to the adverse effects occurs Thus to the psychosocial pressure is now added pharma-cological pleasure

Tolerance and some physical dependence occur Transient withdrawal effects include EEG and sleep changes, impaired performance in some psycho-motor tests, disturbance of mood, and increased appetite (with weight gain), though it is difficult to disentangle psychological from physical effects in these last

ACUTE EFFECTS OF SMOKING TOBACCO

• Increased airways resistance occurs due to the

nonspecific effects of submicronic particles, e.g carbon particles less than 1 um across The effect

is reflex; even inert particles of this size cause bronchial narrowing sufficient to double airways resistance; this is insufficient to cause dyspnoea, though it might affect athletic performance Pure nicotine inhalations of concentration comparable

to that reached in smoking do not increase airways resistance

• Ciliary activity, after transient stimulation, is

depressed, and particles are removed from the lungs more slowly

• Carbon monoxide absorption may be clinically

important in the presence of coronary heart disease (see above) although it is physiologically insignificant in healthy young adults

Nicotine pharmacology

Pharmacokinetics

Nicotine is absorbed through mucous membranes

in a highly pH-dependent fashion The t1/2 is 2 h It is largely metabolised to inert substances, e.g cotinine, though some is excreted unchanged in the urine (pH dependent, it is un-ionised at acid pH) Cotinine is used as a marker for nicotine intake in smoking surveys because of its convenient t1/2 (20 h)

15 Tobacco Advisory Group, Royal College of Physicians 2000 Nicotine addiction in Britain London RCP.

Ngày đăng: 22/01/2014, 00:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm