Study Session 14, Module 29.3, LOS 29.d Related Material SchweserNotes - Book 4 Question #2 of 24 Exposure to rewarded factors can be achieved through A Systematic active management appr
Trang 1https://www.kaplanlearn.com/education/dashboard/index/66a9ea0d62bb71ab495925615029a3fd/practice/qbank/24038518/quiz/83447526/print 1/16
Question #1 of 24
An active equity portfolio manager is benchmarked by their domestic large-cap equity index If
the manager signi cantly lowers the allocation to cash in the portfolio by buying benchmark
securities, this is most likely to:
A) decrease active risk and increase absolute risk
B) increase active risk and decrease absolute risk
C) increase active risk and increase absolute risk
Explanation
Cash is likely to have a low correlation with the benchmark and hence lowering the allocation
to cash and buying benchmark securities is likely to increase the correlation of the portfolio
with the benchmark and hence lower the active risk of the portfolio The absolute risk of the
portfolio measured by standalone standard deviation is likely to increase as the portfolio is
allocating to more risky assets
(Study Session 14, Module 29.3, LOS 29.d)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #2 of 24
Exposure to rewarded factors can be achieved through
A) Systematic active management approaches only
B) Discretionary active management approaches only
C) Both systematic and discretionary active management approaches
Explanation
Systematic approaches are likely to explicitly target exposures to rewarded factors that are
expected to generate excess returns Whilst a discretionary approach may be less formal in
its nature, the judgement employed by discretionary managers could be aimed at identifying
better factor proxies that are expected to outperform
(Study Session 14, Module 29.1, LOS 29.b)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 2Question #3 of 24
An analyst estimates the following data for two active equity fund managers:
Manager Breadth Active Risk Transfer Coe cient
If manager B has the same excess return as manager A, then the Information coe cient of
manager A is closest to:
A) 2 times the information coe cient of manager B
B) 1.4 times the information coe cient of manager B
C) 0.7 times the information coe cient of manager B
Explanation
According to the fundamental law of active management:
Where
E(RA) = excess return of the manager
IC = Information coe cient
BR = breadth
σRA = active risk
TC = transfer coe cient
The excess return of manager A = ICA x √50 x 0.08 x 0.55 = ICA x 0.311
The excess return of manager B = ICB x √100 x 0.08 x 0.55 = ICB x 0.44
If the manager's excess returns are the same this implies
ICA x 0.311 = ICB x 0.44
And, hence, ICA = ICB x (0.44/0.311) = ICB x 1.4
(Study Session 14, Module 29.1, LOS 29.a)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
E ( ) = IC RA √ σ BR ‾ ‾ ‾ R ATC
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 3https://www.kaplanlearn.com/education/dashboard/index/66a9ea0d62bb71ab495925615029a3fd/practice/qbank/24038518/quiz/83447526/print 3/16
Question #4 of 24
A security has an active weight of 10% and the covariance of the security's active returns and
portfolio active returns is 0.005 The contribution of the security to portfolio active variance is
closest to:
A) 0.0005
B) 0.05
C) 0.005
Explanation
The contribution of a security to active variance is the product of the security's active weight
and the covariance of the security's active returns and portfolio active returns In this case
this equals 0.1 x 0.005 = 0.0005
(Study Session 14, Module 29.3, LOS 29.d)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #5 of 24
Manager A generates excess return by maintaining a consistent positive active exposure to the
size factor Manager B has the same benchmark and generates excess return by varying their
exposure to the size factor according to their view on when the factor will outperform Both
managers are highly diversi ed According to the building blocks of active management, which
manager is most likely to be generating return from alpha skills?
A) Manager B only
B) Both Manager A and Manager B
C) Manager A only
Explanation
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 4Manager A is generating excess return through maintaining a di erence in factor weights.
This source of return is not considered alpha since it is not related to manager skill in
identifying mispriced securities and can be easily passively replicated Manager B is engaging
in market timing of the size factor in order to generate excess return, which requires skill in
understanding when the size factor is likely to outperform and when it is likely to
underperform This skill is deemed to be alpha
(Study Session 14, Module 29.1, LOS 29.a)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #6 of 24
An active equity investment manager has a target active risk of 8%, a maximum sector
deviation of 12% and maximum risk contribution from a single security of 2% This manager is
best described as a:
A) Closet Indexer
B) Sector Rotator
C) Concentrated stock picker
Explanation
A high maximum sector deviation and a signi cant target active risk suggests this manager is
a sector rotator A closet indexer would have signi cantly lower target active return, and a
concentrated stock picker would likely have higher maximum risk contribution from a single
security and a lower maximum sector deviation
(Study Session 14, Module 29.2, LOS 29.c)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #7 of 24
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 5https://www.kaplanlearn.com/education/dashboard/index/66a9ea0d62bb71ab495925615029a3fd/practice/qbank/24038518/quiz/83447526/print 5/16
James Greco, CFA, is an investment analyst working as a consultant to institutional clients One
of his clients has asked him about recent innovations in factor-based equity investing In
response to his client's questions, Greco makes the following two statements:
Statement 1: 'Managers that have the ability to short sell in their portfolios are more likely to generate higher information ratios when pursuing diversi ed factor
exposure strategies than long only managers' Statement 2: 'Due to the ability to short sell and the inherent hedging that entails, the long term returns of long/short managers is always expected to be lower than those of long-only managers'
Which of Greco's statements is correct?
A) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2
B) Statement 2 only
C) Statement 1 only
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct Factor returns are usually built from long/short portfolios, for
example the size factor is represented by a portfolio that is long small cap securities and
short large cap securities Hence the ability to target a diversi ed exposure to di erent
factors relies upon the manager being able to short sell securities It is likely that a long-only
manager will have a large exposure to the market risk factor that will dominate other factors
and hence not be su ciently diversi ed across factors
Statement 2 is incorrect Long/short managers can employ signi cant leverage to magnify
expected returns A manager that employs signi cant leverage could match or exceed the
expected returns of a long only portfolio, but may employ leverage levels that some investors
are not comfortable with
(Study Session 14, Module 29.5, LOS 29.h)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #8 of 24
When a benchmark security held in an active portfolio is replaced with a similar security that is
not held in the benchmark, the most likely outcome is:
A) Active Share increases by more than active risk
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 6B) Active Share decreases and active risk increases
C) Active Share and active risk both increase by similar proportions
Explanation
Swapping a security that is in the benchmark for a security that is not in the benchmark will
certainly increase Active Share because Active Share is a direct measure of the amount of the
portfolio that is not included in the benchmark Active risk however will not necessarily
increase since it is a measure of the volatility of relative returns – this is unlikely to increase if
the new security that is introduced in to the portfolio behaves in a similar way to the
benchmark security that was originally held in the portfolio
(Study Session 14, Module 29.2, LOS 29.c)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #9 of 24
Factor timing is a technique most likely employed by a strategy that is:
A) Top down and systematic
B) Bottom up and systematic
C) Top down and discretionary
Explanation
Factor timing Is a di cult challenge, and as such there are few successful systematic
strategies that have integrated factor timing in their approach The judgement required to
enact successful factor timing usually means the strategy is top-down and discretionary
(Study Session 14, Module 29.1, LOS 29.b)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #10 of 24
All of the following characteristics are features of the 'well-constructed portfolio' except:
A) The portfolio delivers results consistent with investor expectations in a
cost-e cicost-ent way
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 7https://www.kaplanlearn.com/education/dashboard/index/66a9ea0d62bb71ab495925615029a3fd/practice/qbank/24038518/quiz/83447526/print 7/16
B) The portfolio delivers results consistent with investor expectations in a risk-e cient
way
C) The portfolio guarantees excess returns relative to the benchmark
Explanation
The well-constructed portfolio does not guarantee excess return vs the benchmark It is
designed to deliver results consistent with investor's risk and return expectations in a cost
and risk-e cient way
(Study Session 14, Module 29.5, LOS 29.g)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #11 of 24
An active equity investment manager follows a strategy which has the following investment
constraints:
Maximum position size is the lesser of 5x the index weight or the index weight plus 2%
No position size is allowed that represents more than 10% of the security's average daily volume (ADV)
No investment is allowed in any security whose index weight is less than 0.1% of the index
Details of the fund and benchmark index are as follows:
Fund size: $500 million Approximate number of positions: 350 Approximate total market capitalisation of benchmark index: $10 trillion Approximate daily trading volume of smaller securities in the benchmark: 0.5% of shares outstanding
The level of assets under management at which the manager's strategy is likely to be a ected
by liquidity and concentration constraints is closest to:
A) $10 billion.
B) $1 billion.
C) $2 billion.
Explanation
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 8The manager cannot invest in stocks whose market cap is below approximately 0.001 x $10
trillion = $10 billion
The ADV of this smallest cap holding would be about 0.005 x $10bn = $50 million
The maximum absolute position size for this smallest cap holding is therefore 0.10 x $50m =
$5 million
The maximum position for the smallest cap security is the lesser of 5 x 0.1% = 0.5% and 0.1%
+ 2% = 2.1% This means the maximum position size in the fund for the smallest cap security
is 0.5%
If the manager cannot hold up to 0.5% of the fund in the smallest capitalization position, then
the ability to carry out the strategy is potentially impaired
Given that the manager cannot hold more than $5 million in the smallest capitalization
holding, this means the ability to carry out the strategy is impaired by illiquidity when AUM
reach $5,000,000/0.005 = $1 billion
(Study Session 14, Module 29.4, LOS 29.f)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #12 of 24
An active equity investment manager has the following four risk constraints:
Liquidity constraint: It should always be possible to liquidate 85% of the portfolio in 10 trading days or less without su ering signi cant market impact costs
Leverage: Explicit leverage is not allowed Leverage using derivates is allowed but restricted to a portfolio assets/equity ratio of 1.5
Maximum tracking error of 5% per annum The 1 % Conditional VaR should not exceed 3%
How many of these constraints are heuristic in nature?
A) Two
B) Three
C) One
Explanation
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 9https://www.kaplanlearn.com/education/dashboard/index/66a9ea0d62bb71ab495925615029a3fd/practice/qbank/24038518/quiz/83447526/print 9/16
Heuristic risk constraints are based on experience and deemed good practise without
rigorous backing of empirical evidence The liquidity constraint and the leverage constraint
are examples of such heuristic risk constraints The tracking error and Conditional Var
constraints are formal constraints in that they are statistical in nature and directly linked to
the distribution of the returns of the portfolio
(Study Session 14, Module 29.3, LOS 29.e)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #13 of 24
Which of the following active equity managers is likely to generate most of their active return
from idiosyncratic risk?
A) A manager following an enhanced indexing factor-tilt approach
B) A manager following a quantitative factor-based approach
C) A stock-picking manager following a fundamental approach
Explanation
Idiosyncratic risk comes from large concentrated positions Quantitative factor-based
managers tend to hold many hundreds of position to generate their desired exposures and
therefore will likely diversify away idiosyncratic risk Similarly, an enhanced indexing manager
will hold a broad portfolio very close to the benchmark index and therefore is likely to be
diversi ed Fundamental stock-picking managers are likely to hold fewer positions since they
generate few high-conviction ideas through time consuming research, hence are likely to be
the least diversi ed and have the highest contribution to active return from idiosyncratic risk
factors
(Study Session 14, Module 29.1, LOS 29.a)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #14 of 24
Which of the following statements regarding risk constraints is most accurate?
A) Formal risk constraints are appropriate for fundamental managers, heuristic risk
constraints are appropriate for quantitative managers
www.ombookcentre.in
Trang 10B) Both Heuristic constraints and formal constraints are equally likely to be
appropriate for both fundamental and quantitative managers
C) Heuristic risk constraints are appropriate for fundamental managers, formal risk
constraints are appropriate for quantitative managers
Explanation
Fundamental managers are likely to run more concentrated portfolios and hold fewer
positions – this increases the estimation errors for return distributions and makes the use of
formal risk constraints that directly relate to estimate return distributions less useful Hence
fundamental managers are more likely to nd heuristic risk constraints more appropriate
Conversely, quantitative active equity managers are likely to integrate formal risk constraint
measures into portfolio optimizers when constructing their portfolios
(Study Session 14, Module 29.3, LOS 29.e)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #15 of 24
All else equal, the well-constructed portfolio for an active equity investment strategy will most
likely have
A) A greater number of positions and lower active share
B) Fewer positions and higher active share
C) A greater number of positions and higher active share
Explanation
Managers that can achieve the desired exposure to risk factors with fewer positions are more
likely to be focussed on risk management and are therefore behaving in a risk-e cient
manner All else equal, portfolios with a higher active share are preferable since these
portfolios will bene t most from the alpha skills of the managers and should therefore have
higher expected returns
(Study Session 14, Module 29.5, LOS 29.g)
Related Material
SchweserNotes - Book 4
Question #16 of 24
www.ombookcentre.in