1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Applying steve pehas approach to teaching l2 writing for the fourth year students of english russian department at ussh

147 11 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Applying steve peha’s approach to teaching l2 writing for the fourth-year students of english – russian department at ussh
Tác giả Phan Thị Mai Trang
Người hướng dẫn Nguyễn Thị Kiều Thu, Ph.D.
Trường học Vietnam National University - Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Chuyên ngành TESOL
Thể loại Thesis
Năm xuất bản 2011
Thành phố Ho Chi Minh City
Định dạng
Số trang 147
Dung lượng 1,67 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Cấu trúc

  • 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY (12)
  • 1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY (0)
  • 1.3 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROBLEM (0)
  • 1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS (21)
  • 1.5 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY (22)
  • 1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY (23)
  • 1.7 ORGANOZATION OF THE STUDY… (0)
  • 2.1 AN OVERVIEW OF WRITING SKILL (25)
    • 2.1.1 The nature of writing (25)
      • 2.1.1.1 Definition of writing (25)
      • 2.1.1.2 The importance of teaching writing (26)
    • 2.1.2 Approaches to teaching writing (27)
      • 2.1.2.1 Exploring the difficulties in teaching writing….… (0)
      • 2.2.2.2 Brief introduction of writing teaching Approaches (0)
    • 2.1.3 Criteria of w well-formed piece of writing (0)
      • 2.1.3.1 Ideas (33)
      • 2.1.3.2 Organization (34)
      • 2.1.3.3 Voice (36)
      • 2.1.3.4 Word Choice (37)
      • 2.1.3.5 Sentence Fluency (37)
      • 2.1.3.6 Convention (38)
  • 2.2 READING AND WRITING RELATIONSHIP… (38)
    • 2.2.1 A historical review of reading and writing connection (0)
    • 2.2.2 The influence of reading on writing (41)
  • 2.3 STEVE READ-LIKE_A_WRITER APPROACH (0)
  • 3.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS (52)
  • 3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN (52)
    • 3.2.1 The subjects (52)
      • 3.2.1.1 Sampling (52)
      • 3.2.1.2 The Participants (0)
    • 3.2.2 The Instruments (55)
      • 3.2.2.1 The Experimental teaching (0)
      • 3.2.2.2 The Pre-test and Post-test (0)
      • 3.2.2.3 Two sets of survey questionnaires (0)
  • 3.3 DATA ANALYSIS (69)
  • 4.1 DISCUSSION O THE WRITING TEST RESULTS (0)
    • 4.1.1 The analysis of Writing test’s criteria (0)
      • 4.1.1.1 The analysis of Organization (73)
      • 4.1.1.2 The analysis of Ideas (74)
      • 4.1.1.3 The analysis of Word Choice (75)
      • 4.1.1.4 The analysis of Sentence Fluency (76)
      • 4.1.1.5 The analysis of Convention (77)
    • 4.1.2 The analysis of Writing test’s Scores (0)
  • 4.2 DISCUSSION OF THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES… (0)
    • 4.2.1 The importance of writing (81)
    • 4.2.2 Students’ frequency of writing practice (83)
    • 4.2.3 The difficult level of essay writing (0)
    • 4.2.4 Criteria for measuring how a good essay is (0)
    • 4.2.5 Difficulties encountered by the student writers (0)
    • 4.2.6 Reasons why students are not good at writing (0)
    • 4.2.7 Suggestions to improve the teaching and learning of essay writing (89)
  • 5.1 CONCLUSION (95)
  • 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS (96)
    • 5.2.1 To the Teachers (96)
    • 5.2.2 To the students (98)
    • 5.3.3 To the Writing syllabus (0)
  • APPENDIX 1 ESSAY WRITING RUBRIC (105)
  • APPENDIX 2 PERFORMANCE OF 04A-CONTROL GROUP (107)
  • APPENDIX 3 PERFORMANCE OF 04B-EXPERIMENTAL GROUP….… (118)
  • APPENDIX 4 TEST RESULTS OF 04A (129)
  • APPENDIX 5 TEST RESULTS OF 04B (130)
  • APPENDIX 6 SAMPLE 1- PRE-TEST-04A (131)
  • APPENDIX 7 SAMPLE 1- PRE-TEST-04B (133)
  • APPENDIX 8 SAMPLE 2- POST-TEST-04A (134)
  • APPENDIX 9 SAMPLE 2- POST-TEST-04B (135)
  • APPENDIX 10 STUDENT’S QUESTIONNAIRE IN VETNAMESE (136)
  • APPENDIX 11 STUDENT’S QUESTIONNAIRE IN ENGLISH (139)
  • APPENDIX 12 TEACHER’S QUESTIONNAIRE IN VETNAMESE (142)
  • APPENDIX 13 TEACHER’S QUESTIONNAIRE IN VETNAMESE (145)

Nội dung

BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

For years, writing instruction has been unfairly marginalized, often relegated to mere "homework" due to time constraints and curriculum demands (Hedge, 1998, cited in Simpson, 2004) This limited focus on writing has hindered effective teacher guidance Structuralists and audio linguists prioritized oral communication and reading, viewing writing primarily as a means to practice grammatical and lexical patterns, with an emphasis on accuracy over content and self-expression (Tribble, 1996, cited in Simpson, 2004) Consequently, students faced significant challenges in producing coherent, error-free texts without prior consideration of the meaning behind their writing.

(1996) stated that they were basically “writing to learn” and not “learning to write” as instructed by this traditional product-oriented approach

Since the 1980s, the perspective on writing has evolved significantly with the rise of communicative language teaching, acknowledging that writing is a multi-step process Silva (1990:15) emphasizes that the process-oriented approach requires systematic development, including the crucial integration of reading and writing.

Reading and writing are interconnected processes that enhance each other; reading enriches knowledge across various topics, providing material for writing, while writing deepens understanding and develops cognitive frameworks that facilitate reading This reciprocal relationship suggests that both activities utilize similar cognitive structures to construct a cohesive text world (Kucer, 1985).

At the Department of English-Russian Linguistics and Literature (DERLL) at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities (USSH), the writing program emphasizes language as a product rather than the process of acquiring it This focus on a product-oriented approach highlights the correlation between reading and writing in knowledge construction, yet prioritizes the final output over the developmental stages of writing.

After four years of skill training focused on a "formulaic" approach to writing specific types of paragraphs and essays, many students reported a hollow feeling in their writing Despite practicing these methods, they struggled to effectively express their ideas, highlighting a gap between formulaic training and genuine expression.

An important system reform transformed the existing framework into a credit-based system, necessitating updates in curriculum design and teaching methodologies In the context of DERLL, reading and writing skills are now to be taught concurrently, aiming to establish effective writing teaching and learning strategies.

An integrated classroom offers a promising method to enhance the reading and writing skills of DERLL students through critical and analytic oriented-writing reading activities Steve Peha's approach emphasizes reading not just for comprehension but to acquire language skills that improve writing In this context, students engage in writing as part of a reading-writing class, making the integrated-skill classroom an ideal setting to implement Peha's "Read like a writer" strategy.

It is insufficient if there is not an introduction about Steve Peha and his read- like-a-writer approach, which is theoretical framework for the study

AN INTRODUCTION ABOUT STEVE PEHA

Steve Peha, a former software developer and high-tech entrepreneur, founded Teaching That Makes Sense (TTMS) in 1995, an education consultancy focused on literacy, assessment, and educational leadership His mission is to identify and create the most effective educational practices and disseminate this knowledge to educators worldwide.

Since starting TTMS, he has written extensively on education including over

300 articles for The Seattle Times' Effective Learning Series for which he won the

In 2001, he received the Innovators in Education Award from the Newspaper Association of America His collaborative book, "Be a Better Writer," co-authored with journalist Margot Carmichael Lester, won the 2006 Gold Medal for Young Adult Non-Fiction from the Independent Publishers Association With a prolific career, he has penned over 1,000 articles on education and authored six books.

Peha emphasizes the importance of extensive practice in diverse educational settings to truly grasp the essence of education Having collaborated with students of varying grades and abilities across over 200 schools in the U.S and Canada, he gained valuable insights into the impact of new policies on existing teaching practices.

Steve Peha, President of Teaching That Makes Sense, an education consultancy in Carrboro, NC, is a prominent voice in education policy, contributing regularly to The National Journal Education Experts Blog His insights have been featured in notable publications such as The Washington Post, DropoutNation, EdNews, and The Carrboro Citizen Peha is also the author of three influential books on teaching: "Be a Writer," "Be a Better Writer," and "Reading."

Steve Peha is a dedicated professional educator who goes above and beyond through extensive volunteer work and a busy schedule of paid commitments He is certified by the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory as a trainer in Six Traits writing assessment and instruction, and has conducted numerous workshops across Washington and several other states.

Steve is dedicated to enhancing the educational experience for teachers and students, offering his expertise beyond his contractual obligations He provides free materials and unlimited email support following workshops, teaches model lessons, develops curricula, and coordinates classroom observations Additionally, for each day of contracted training, he volunteers at least one day for guest teaching or classroom observation As a committed classroom volunteer, Steve contributes 10-15 hours weekly, supporting teachers in subjects such as reading, writing, math, social studies, and science.

(Judith Strosahl, 3rd Grade Teacher, Whittier Elementary School, Seattle,

STEVE PEHA’S READ-LIKE-A-WRITER APPROACH

Peha (2003) raises a question: What do readers do when they read? Sounds like a strange question, doesn’t it? After all, readers just read, don’t they?

The essence of reading lies in understanding its cognitive process, as your mind actively engages with the text beyond merely vocalizing words in your head By recognizing the complexities of your mental activity during reading, you can enhance your reading skills significantly.

Understanding the intricacies of a reader's mind remains elusive, as each individual approaches reading uniquely To explore this phenomenon, one can propose a theory suggesting that there are two distinct reading styles.

AN OVERVIEW OF WRITING SKILL

READING AND WRITING RELATIONSHIP…

RESEARCH DESIGN

DISCUSSION O THE WRITING TEST RESULTS

DISCUSSION OF THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES…

RECOMMENDATIONS

Ngày đăng: 27/05/2021, 23:30

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm

w