Title:Theimpactofrewardsystemsonemployeeperformance AthesissubmittedtoDublinBusinessSchoolinpartialfulfilmentof therequirementsforMastersofBusinessAdministrationinBusinessManage ment Bri
Trang 1Title:Theimpactofrewardsystemsonemployeeperformance
AthesissubmittedtoDublinBusinessSchoolinpartialfulfilmentof therequirementsforMastersofBusinessAdministrationinBusinessManage
ment
BrianMurphyStud entno:1690779 WordCount:20,320
Trang 2Contents
Declaration 3
Abstract 4
Chapter1:Introductionandbackground 5
1.1 Introduction 5
1.2 Background 7
1.3 ResearchIssue 8
Chapter2:LiteratureReview 9
2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 TeamBasedRewardSystems 10
2.3 Performance RelatedPay(PRP) 15
2.4 TotalRewardsSystem 22
2.5 Conclusiononliteraturereview 31
2.6 Limitationsonliteraturereview 32
Chapter3:ResearchMethodology 33
3.1 Introduction 33
3.2 ResearchPhilosophy 33
3.3 ResearchApproach&Design 34
3.4 ResearchStrategy 36
3.5 DataCollection 37
3.5.1 PrimaryData 38
3.5.2 SecondaryData 40
3.6 InterviewSelection 41
3.6.1 Linkto theresearch 41
3.6.2 DataQuality 42
3.6.3 Preparingtheinterviews 42
3.7 EthicalIssues 43
3.8 ResearchLimitations 44
Chapter4:Findings,AnalysisandDiscussion 45
4.1 Introduction 45
4.2 Interviewee Profile 45
Trang 34.3 PresentationofFindings 45
4.3.1 EmployeePerformanceandRewards 46
4.3.2 Teambasedrewards 47
4.3.3 PerformanceRelated Pay 49
4.3.4 TotalRewardsSystem 50
4.4 AnalysisandDiscussion 52
4.4.1 Introduction 52
4.4.2 DiscussionofThemes 52
Chapter5:ConclusionandRecommendations 57
5.1 Conclusion 57
5.2 Recommendations 59
Chapter6:ReflectiononLearning 61
Bibliography 65
Appendix1:Interview1SK01 72
Appendix2:Interview2SK02 77
Appendix3:Interview3SK03 83
Appendix4:Interview4SK04 87
Appendix5:Requesttogainaccesstoresearchmaterial 91
Appendix6:ConfidentialityAgreement 94
Appendix7:ConsentForm 95
Appendix8: SecurityClearance 96
Trang 4Iherebydeclarethatthismaterial,whichInowsubmitforassessmentontheprogrammeo f studyleadingtotherewardofMastersofBusinessAdministrationatDublinBusinessSchool,i s entirelymyownworku n l e s s referencedi n t h e t e x t asa specificsourceandincludedinthe bibliography.Furthermore,n o part ofthis work hasbeens u b m i t t e d fo rassessmentforanyotheracademicpurposeotherthaninpartialfulfilmentofthatstatedabove
Trang 5theeffectsofrewardsystemsonemployeeperformanceint h e modernworke n v i r o n m e n tandh o w satisfactionw i t h rewardscanleadt o h i g h e r performanceandbetterjobsatisfaction.Basedonacriticalreviewofpublishedliterature,i t i s clearh o w i m p o r t a n t t h e rightcombinationo f rewardsi s t o t h e performanceo f anorganisation.Employeesshouldalwaysbeawareoftherelationshipbetweentheirlevelo f performanceandhowtheyarerewardedforthatperformance.Thisthesiswillexamineh o w differenttypeso f rewardsystemsaffectt h a t performanceanda t t e m p t t o establishwhichtypeofrewardsystemsaremorebeneficialtothecompanyinquestionandinthecurrentbusinessclimateitoperatesin.Theresearchisconductedinaperiodofparticularfinancialturbulencefortheminingindustry,andwiderglobaleconomicenvironment.Ass u c h , rewardstructuresandtheperceivedvalueofthoserewards,comemoreintofocusasfinancialpressuresrestrictt h e t y p e o f r e w a r d s available,w h i l e retainingandm o t
i v a t i n g staffbecomesmorechallenging.Howcanperformancebeenhancedandtherequiredbusinessoutcomesaccomplished?
H o w canrewardsystemsc o n t r i b u t e t o thisperformanceandoutcomes?
Theseissueswillbeaddressedinthecontextofbestinternationalpracticeregardingrewardstructuresandfromprimarydatacollection.Thisresearchwasc o n d u c t e d atoperationalmanageriallevel.C o n s i d e r i n g h o w manyemployeesr e p o r t i n t o t h i s level,t h i s i s where
I b e l i e v e b o t h employeeandemployerinteractthemost
regardingrewards,motivationandhowthataffectsperformance
Trang 61.1 Introduction
Payingemployeesf o r p r o d u c t i v i t y h a s b e e n t h e cornerstoneofi n d u s t r i a l andbusinessdevelopmentf o r centuries.Financialrewardhasalwaysb e e n i m p o r t a n t i n managingemployee’sperformance,butoverthelast25yearsotherelementsofcompensationhavedevelopedt o provideemployersw i t h m o r e scopet o reward,andt h u s , m o t i v a t e employees.Armstronga n d Taylor(2010,p 3 3 1 ) s t a t e t h a t “performancei s definedasbehaviourt h a t a c c o
m p l i s h e s results.Performancemanagementi n f l u e n c e s performancebyh e l p i n g p e o p
l e t o u n d e r s t a n d w h a t goodperformancem e a n s andbyprovidingt h e informationneededtoimproveit.Rewardmanagementinfluencesperformancebyrecognisingandrewardinggoodperformanceandbyprovidingincentivestoimproveit”
Thepurposeo f t h i s researchstudyi s t o attemptt o i d e n t i f y h o w t h e s e rewardsimpactemployeep e r f o r m a n c e andh o w wellt h e c u r r e n t rewardsystemdoest h i s , w i t h i n thec
Trang 7Definingtheconceptofhumanresourcemanagementinthemid-1980’sledtoagreaterappreciationforthevalueyourworkforcecouldmaketotheoverallbusinessgoalsoftheorganisationandh o w i t couldb e groomeda n d cultivatedt o addm o s t valuet o competitiveadvantage.Forthepurposeofthisstudy,thedesiredoutcomeistoshowifdifferenttypeso f r e w a r d s y s t e m s d o havep o s i t i v e consequencesandi f t h e s e consequencesdevelopi n t o increasedo r decreasedperformance.Weightman(2004,p
174)argues“ t hem a i n constructo f p e r f o r m a n c e managementi s t h a t w o r k groupsandi
n d i v i d u a l s seewhatt h e y h a v e t o d o t o m a k e t h e i r contributiont o theorganisationsoveralleffectiveness.Thereneedstobeaclearlinkwiththeorganisationalobjectivesandt h i
s i n v o l v e s goodcommunicationofclearobjectivesthat everyoneunderstands”
Basedo n the re vi ew ofcurrentliterature,this researchsetsoutto e x p l o r e clearlywhatvariablese x i s t i n attributingt h e correctr e w a r d structuret o ani n d i v i d u a l employeeorteam.Rewardmanagementi s b o t h complexandproblematicandv e r y susceptiblet o o u t s i d einfluencessuchaseconomicenvironments,cultureandindividualemployeepreferencesandperceptions.Whatisapplicable,effectiveandperformanceenhancing
foro n e employeeo r teamm a y n o t havet h e sameeffecto n o t h e r e m p l o y e e ’si n similarcircumstances.Thereism u c h p u b l i s h e d literatureo n t h e b e n e f i t s andproblemssurroundingp e r f o r m a n c e managementandp e r f o r m a n c e appraisalsystems.Thesebecomem o r e complexandhardert o manageasorganisationalstructurescrossinternationalboundariesandcultures.Inthiscontext, therewardsystemsw e applycanbecomevitali n a c h i e
v i n g t h e desiredlevelofperformanceandj o b s a t i s f a c t i o n Theresearcherhasworkedf
or 7yearswithinthe chosenorganisationfortheresearch,holdingvarioussupervisoryandmanagerialroles,soisawareofhowimportantrewardssystemsaretoemployeeperformance.Assuch,Iaimtoexaminewhatimpactsthecurrentrewardstructurehasonperformance,andtoalesserextentmotivation, andhowthatrelatestobestinternationalpracticein thethemesexamined
Trang 81.2 Background
Theresearchw i l l focuso n one co mp an y -S a n d v i k
Mining-a SwedishmMining-anufMining-acturingcompMining-any,speciMining-alisinginproducingMining-andsupplyingmMining-achineryfortheminingsectorglobally.Ithasover15,000employees.SandvikMining hasbeenapartoftheSandvikGroups i n c e 1 9 9 8 whent h e SandvikGroupacquiredt h e FinishCompany,Tamrock.SandvikMiningisaleadingglobalsupplierofequipmentandtools,serviceandtechnicals o l u
t i o n s f o r the miningindustry
http://www.mining.sandvik.com/
Theresearchw i l l focuso n employeesi n t h e s u p p l y chainmanagementsectiono f t h e company,acrossdifferentdepartmentsandgeographiclocationsandwithdifferentculturalbackgrounds
Thisresearchproposalt a k e s a qualitativeapproachto a n a l y s i n g collectedprimary dataandalsoe x t e n s i v e l y usesp u b l i s h e d literatureco nc er ni ng ther o l e of rewardsystemsi nperformance managementandthereeffectonemployee performance
Employeer e t e n t i o n relatesd i r e c t l y toh o w w e rewardth em Replacingemployeesi n a c
o m p a n y canbeanarduousandexpensiveexercise.Eveninmoresecureindustriessuchast
h e p u b l i c sector,performanceneedst o b e managedandstaffm o t i v a t e d asi n t h e privat
es e c t o r Retentiono f experienceds t a f f i n b o t h t h e s e i n d u s t r i e s i s importantt ocreatecompetitiveadvantageandorganisationalsuccess.Thisstudywillalsolookattheimportanceofrewardingexperiencedandhighperforming staff.Soinatime whentheamountoffinancialrewardsisrestrictedbytheeconomicclimate,retaininghighperformersw i t h rewardshast o b e achievedwhilem a k i n g allstafffeelvalued.I w i l l investigatei f thesev a l u e s , alongw i t h a totalrewardapproacht o h o w w e compensateemployees,haveaneffectonemploy
ee performance
Asmoreandm o r e o r g a n i s a t i o n s crossinternationalb o u n d a r i e s t o
c o n d u c t business,rewardst h a t a r e r e l e v a n t i n o n e c o u n t r y maynotb e asimportanti
n another.I aimt o establishifastructuredrewardsystem,andthespecifictypeofrewardsapplicabletothisorganisation,isimperativeforincreasingemployeeperformanceorifithasanyeffectatall.Thisisallin thecontextofaneverchanging society,wheremostworkersaspiretobe
Trang 9wealthyinawaythatpreviousgenerationsdidnot.Theseaspirationsfromanincreasingeducatedandm o b i l e workforcep u t evenm o r e emphasiso n anorganisationsrewardsystemsandstructures,andhighlighttheimportanceofrewardsinthecontextofa c h i e v i n g j o b satisfactionamongemployee’sa n d u s i n g t h i s asa competitiveweaponagainstbusinessrivals.
Trang 10Thisliteraturereviewonrewardsystemsencompassestheareasofperformance relatedpay,totalrewards y s t e m s andteamr e w a r d s Itw i l l revealt h e manydifferentt y p e s o f incentivesavailablet o moderndayemployeesaswellast h e mostfavourablewayt o a p p l y thoseincentivestogetthebestperformanceformyourstaff.Reviewingthecurrentp u b l i s h e d literature
i n t h i s fieldw i l l allowt h e researcherestablisha base,t o whichfurtherresearchcanbeadded.Thisdissertationexploresthreeoft h e maintheoriesandpracticeso f rewardsi n t h e w
o r k p l a c e andh o w theyaffectp e r f o r m a n c e , asw e l l asspecificcasesw i t h i n organisationsexploredi n t h e criticalr e v i e w o f a l r e a d y published literature.T h e t h e o r y onrewardsystemsandt h e i r effectso n performancec a n n o t b e evaluatedwithoutlookingathowworkmotivationisalsoaffectedbytheserewardsandh o w t h a t m o t i v a t i o n i s d
i r e c t l y linkedt o p e r f o r m a n c e Kanferetal
( 2 0 1 2 ) d e s c r i b e m ot iv at i on intheworksenseasasetofprocesseswhichareultimatelyusedtodeterminea person’sactions,andwhichactionst h e y willuseto achievea desiredoutcome.T h i s psychologicalproceduredetermineshow personaleffortisused inthe‘direction,i
n t e n s i t y andpersistence’oftheseactionsinrelationtoyourwork.Howyouarerewardedfor
thisworkwillhaveagreateffectonthisdirection,intensityandpersistence.Ensuringyouhavetherightrewardstrategyandstructureinplaceinyourorganisationisvitalforthepositiveperformanceandmotivationofyourstaffandtheserewardssystemss h o u l d b e basedo n w h a t i s neededt o achievet h e desiredl e v e l o f p e r f o r m a n c e andm o t i v a t i o n Adams(1965)describese q u i t y t h e o r y ast h e perceptiono f h o w youa r e treatedcomparedtoothersandinessencethatyouwillbemoresatisfiedandmotivatedifyouthinkyouarebeenfairlytreated.T
Trang 11hisproceduraljusticeelementtohowrewardsareinterpretedr u n s deepi n termso f t h i s performanceandm o t i v a t i o n Armstrong(2010,
Trang 12p.41)statest h a t “ i ngeneral,u s e
anevidence-basedapproach,whiche s s e n t i a l l y means managingrewardsystemsonthebasisofevidenceratherthanopinion,onunderstandingratherthanassumptions,andonanunrelentingcommitmenttogatherthenecessaryfactst o makemoreintelligentandinformeddecisions”
2.2 TeamBasedRewardSystems
Int h e m o d e r n businesse n v i r o n m e n t , teamperformancei s b e c o m i n g m o r e and
m o r e criticalt o organisationalsuccess.O n e oft h e f i r s t questionsaskedatm o s t interviewst o d a y is‘canyouworkaspartofateam?’E n s u r i n g employeesworkbothproductivelyandcollaboratively aspartofateamcanbedifficult andaccordingtoTorringtonetal.(2011)iftheperformancemanagementactivityisnotdefinedcorrectly,employeesi n d i v i d
u a l goalsmaydamagetheteam’sperformanceandviceversa.Groupbasedawardsappeart o b e
l o g i c a l c o m p l i m e n t s o f performancemeasurementt h a t focuseso n teamsandthequality/
quantityofworktheyproduceand(Dematteoetal.,1998,p.144)f o u n d th at applyingrewardst o teamsasa who le is basedo n t h e assumptiont h a t teamrewardsw i l l d o s o m e t h i n g q
u a l i t a t i v e l y differentt h a n i n d i v i d u a l rewards.A l s o froma performanceevaluationpointofview,itmaybeeasierandlesscomplexfor
amanagertoevaluatea t e a m ’ s performanceasopposedt o i n d i v i d u a l performance.S o i
t couldb e arguedt h a t m a n a g i n g performanceandr e w a r d s availablefora c h i e v i
n g t h e levelofperformancedesiredcanbecomplimentaryandlesstimeconsumingfromamonitoring andm e a s u r i n g p o i n t ofv i e w i n a teamb a s e d structure.H o w e v e r , a
c c o r d i n g t o (Armstrong,2012,p.294)itcantaketimeforateammembertoadjusttopartoftheirremunerationbeend e t e r m i n e d byt h e groupe f f o r t andh o w l o n g t h a t takeswill
bedeterminedbyt h e m a t u r i t y o f t h e teamm e m b e r s andh o w u s e d theya r e t o w o r
k i n g together.Althought h e ideao f h a v i n g a highperformingteamworkingc l o s e l y
a n d c o l l a b o r a t i v e l y t o g e t h e r i s appealing,t h e dangeri s forcingp e o p l e i n
t o a newremunerationarrangementwhomayalreadybejustgettingusedtoanewwayofworking
Trang 13Insomeorganisationsitmaybemoreadvantageoustonotapplyindividualperformancetargetsandf o c u s onlyoncollectiverewardandperformancep l a n s K r a m a r andSyed(2012)hasidentifiedthatgrouprewardsorincentivesaremorelikelytoyieldacollaborativeapproachto
reachingyoursharedgoals.Theyalsoarguet h a t collectivei n c e n t i v e schemesmayencouragem o r e organisationalbuyinfromemployeescomparedto thoseschemesofanindividualnature.However,thisdoesnotmeanthatteambasedrewardsarenotcompatiblewithindividualperformancerelatedpayschemesasb o t h c a n becombinedw i t h c a r e f u l attention.A s Kerrin’sandOliver(2002)commentintheirresearchoncollectiveandindividualimprovementactivities,t h e effectivenesso f collectiveo r teamb a s e d r e w a r d s canbed i
r e c t l y relatedt o t h e cultureo f t h e organisation.A s basep a y fromani n d i v i d u a l i s t i c
p o i n t o f v i e w hasalwaysbeenseenast h e backboneo f c o m p e n s a t i o n , whenorganisationaldesignmoves into supporting teams forproductivity,thenthe applicable collectiverewardssh o u l d b e adaptedt o s u p p o r t t h i s T h e y foundth at c o m p a n i e s facedchallengesin movingfrom atraditionalsystemofrewardbasedaroundtheindividual to
am o r e teambasedrewardstructure,butthattheycouldoperatesimultaneouslywithsuccess.Theyalsonotethatchallengesalsoarisewheremanufacturingprocessescanbeb u i l t aroundtheconceptofteams,whilerewardsforcontinuousimprovementactivitiess t i l l remainlinkedtoindividualrewards
AstudybyMichaelD.Johnson(2009)arguestheeffectivenessofateambasedrewardsystem
i n t h e basicsense.T h e dynamicso f t heteamp l a y a b i g parti n t h e “rewardinterdependence”,i.e.howanindividual’srewardisbasedontheperformanceofanotherteammember.Thisstudyarguestheneedtointroducemoreindividualincentiveswithint h e teambasedrewardstructure.“EqualAllocations”becomeimportantwhererewardisn o t onlydependentonoverallteamperformance,butissharedequallybetweenallteammembers( J o h n s o n , 2009,p.4) Itsuggeststeammembersm u s t helpeacho t h e r t o achievet h e i r endresult,b u t t h e yarerewardedd i f f e r e n t l y basedo n w h a t theyh a v e contributedt o t h e team’sperformance.H e alsof o u n d t h a t wheret r a n s p a r e n c y ofteammember’scontributionsisvisible,thenitcanmaketheteammembermoreconsciousoft h a t contribution,thusincreasingthetendencytoactinfavouroftheteam.Researchintot h e relationshipbetweenempowermentandrewardsbyBornandMolleman(1996)found