Declaration...6 Acknowledgements...9 Abstract...10 Chapter-1...11 INTRODUCTION...11 1.1 Background:...11 1.2 Aimandoverallresearchquestions...12 1.3 Interestandsuitabilityoftheresearcher
Trang 1Financialinstitutionsh a v e n o t assistedi n t h e d e v e l o p m e
n t andgrowthofsmallandmediumscaleindustriesinIndia
AstudyonSMEindustriesinUttarPradeshregion
DublinBusinessSchool InAssociationwithLiverpoolJohnMooresUniversity
Trang 2Declaration 6
Acknowledgements 9
Abstract 10
Chapter-1 11
INTRODUCTION 11
1.1 Background: 11
1.2 Aimandoverallresearchquestions 12
1.3 Interestandsuitabilityoftheresearcher 14
1.4 Recipientsofresearch 14
1.5 Majorcontributionofthestudy 15
1.6 ResearchLimitations 15
1.7 Organisationofthedissertation 16
CHAPTER-2 17
LITERATUREREVIEW 17
2.1 Introduction 17
2.2 TheoreticalDefinitions 17
2.3 CriticalEvaluationoftheTheoriesBuiltontheFIsGrowthandSuccessofSMEs 18
2.3.1 TheHamperingandInteractiveIssuesofFIstowardsSuccessofSMEs 18
2.3.2 DeterminantsofcapitalstructureofSMEs 20
2.3.3 Linkbetweencapitalstructureandfinancialinstitutionsdevelopment 21
ReviewofEmpiricalStudies 21
2.4 EmpiricalStudiesinIndia 21
2.4.2 TheRoleofFinancialInstitutionsinFinancingSMEsinIndia 22
2.4.2.3 Non-Governmentorganization(NGO/MFIs) 23
2.4.2.4 Creditunions 24
2.5 SmallandMediumEnterprisesectorinIndia 25
2.5.1 Definingthesector 26
2.5.2 ContributionofSMEsectortoIndianEconomy 27
2.5.3 ChallengesofSMEsinIndia 28
2.5.4 InitiativeswhicharetakenbyGovernmentinorderstimulateSMEsinIndia 30
Trang 32.6.1 Africa 31
2.6.2 AsiaandLatinAmerica 31
2.6.3 Europe 32
2.7 ConclusiononLiteratureReview 32
CHAPTER-3 34
ResearchMethodology 34
3.1 Introduction 34
3.2 Researchquestions 35
3.3 ResearchHypothesis 36
3.5 Researchphilosophy 37
3.6 Researchapproach 38
3.6.1 Inductiveapproach: 39
3.6.2 Deductiveapproach 39
3.7 Researchstrategy 40
3.8 ResearchChoice 41
3.9 TimeHorizon 41
3.10 Datacollection 42
3.11 Primaryresearch 42
3.11.1 Quantitativeprimaryresearch 42
3.11.2 Quantitative-Questionnairemethod 43
3.12 SecondaryResearch 44
3.13 Dataanalysis 44
3.14 Sampling 45
3.15 Ethics 47
3.16 ValidityandReliability 47
3.17 Limitationsofthestudy 48
3.18 Conclusion 48
CHAPTER–4 49
STUDYFINDINGSANDANALYSIS 49
4.1 Introduction 49
4.2 MethodologyofResearch 49
4.3 PercentageofResponsesfromSMEs andfinancialinstitutions 50
3
Trang 44.4 SmallandMediumScaleenterprises 51
4.4.1 KeyCharacteristicsoftheRespondents 51
4.4.2 FormofOwnership 53
4.4.3 Thenatureofcompany‟soperations 54 4.4.4 Ageofbusiness 55
4.4.5 Hypothesis 57
4.4.6 Experienceonloanapplication 57
4.4.7 Loansuccessrate 60
4.4.8 MajorthreatstothedevelopmentofSMEs 75
4.4.9 Problemsinaccessingfinance 76
4.4.10 Most preferredtypeofexternalfinancing 78
4.5 Financialinstitutions 79
4.5.1 Genderofrespondents 81
4.5.2 Ageofrespondents 81
4.5.3 Typeofproductsandservicesoffered 82
4.5.4 ExperienceindealingwithSMEloans 85
4.5.5 Obstacles 86
4.5.6 Prioritizationwhilegivingloans 87
4.5.7 FactorspreventSMEoperatorsinborrowing 88
4.5.8 DriversofFIsinvolvementwithSMEs 90
4.5.9 Usefulness 91
4.5.10 StrategiestoimproveaccessibilityoffinancetoSMEs 93
4.5.11 OpiniononGovernmentsupport 94
4.5.12 shouldthegovernmentsupporttheSME 95
4.6 Hypothesis: Conclusion 96
CHAPTER-5 98
CONCLUSION 98
5.1 Validationoflaidhypothesis 102
5.2 ConceptualFramework 103
Recommendations 106
Trang 5Introduction 109
7.2 Learningstyle 109
7.2.1 TheoreticalBackground 109 7.2.2 Reflectiononownlearningstyles 112
7.3 AssessmentofResearchProcess 113 7.3.1 Process 113
7.3.2 UseofSources 114
7.3.3 Formulationofdissertationprocess 114
7.4 Skillsdevelopment 115
7.4.1 Researchskills 115
7.4.2 Timemanagementskills 115
7.4.3 InterpersonalSkills 115
7.4.4 Learningskills 116
7.4.5 Criticalthinkingskills 116
7.4.6 Communicationskills 116
7.4.7 Teamworkingskill 117
7.5 FutureApplicationofLearningandSkillsDevelopment 117
REFERENCE 118
APPENDICES 122
Trang 7forseekingcredit……… 65Figure4.11Loansizeoftherespondent………
66Figure:4.12Loanproviders……… 67Figure4.13
opinionsonLoanrepayment……… 69Figure:4.14AchievementofSalesrevenue……… 70Figure:4.15Achievementofprofitability……….71Figure:4.16Achievementofphysicalassets……… 72Figure:4.17Achievementoffinancialassets………
73Figure:4.18Achievementofmarketcoverage… … … …
… … … 7 4
Trang 8Figure:4.19 Threats……… 75
Trang 9Figure4.20Preventingfactors……… 75Figure:4.21: MostPreferredFinance………76Figure:4.22financialinstitutions……… 76Figure:4.23Genderof
respondents……… 77Figure:4.24
Ageofrespondents………77Figure:4.25products
andserviceofferedbyfinancialinstitutions……… 78Figure4.26Levelofexperie
loans……… 80Figure:4.27Obstaclestofinancialinstitution‟sinvolvementwithSMEs………81Figure:4.28PrioritizationofLoansto
SMEs……… 83Figure:4.29FactorsthatpreventSMEoperatorstoborrowfromFIs……… 84Figure:4.30DriversofFIsinvolvementwith
onGovernmentsupport……… 86Figure:4.32
Ratingongovernmentsupport……… 88Figure:5.1ConceptualFrameworks……… 96Figure6.1: Kolb
……….97Figure6.2:Honey&Mumford;learningstylesdiagram………
……… 98
Trang 11Signed:Joise Mole Lukose
Date: 23rdMay2014
8
Trang 12Firstofall,Iwould liketothanksGod almightywho
hasbeengivingmeeverythingtoaccomplishthisthesis:Patience,health, wisdom,andblessings
Iwouldliketothankmygreatsupervisor,Mr.MichaelKealyforthepatientguidance,encouragementandadvicehehasprovidedthroughoutthisdissertationprocess.Hissupportwasg r e a t l y appreciatedthroughout
Iwantt o c o n v e y a greatt h a n k yout o allo f lecturersfort h e i r greatcontributioni n sharingknowledgeandadviceduringmyacademicyears.Icouldnotcompletethisthesiswellwithoutt h e i r goodcontributionandideas
.Iwouldliketothankalloftheindividualswhoparticipatedintheresearchsurvey,givingtheirvaluablet i m e ande x p e r t i s e T h e c o n t r i b u t i o n s t h a t werem a d e p r o v e d tob e veryv a l u a b l e i nconductingthisresearchstudy
Iame s p e c i a l l y gratefult o myparents,w h o s u p p o r t e d m e e m o t i o n a l l y andf i n a n c i a
l l y T h i s accomplishmentwould nothave beenpossible withoutthem.Thankyou
Trang 13SmallandMediumEnterprisesarethedrivingforceforthepromotionofaneconomy.Duetoitssignificance,allt h e countrieseither,developedo r developing,areconcentratingo n t h e developmentofSME‟s.Itisadmittedfactthatencouragingentrepreneurshipisakeytoimprovecompetitiveness,b o o s t tradevolume,fosteringeconomica c t i v i t i e s andcreationo f j o b opportunities.Smallenterprisesareconsideredasmaindriverforinnovation,povertyreduction,employmentgenerationandsocialintegration
necessarytocreateaneconomicenvironmentthatenablesSMEstogrowandprosper.Thepurposeofthestudywast o evaluatetheextentofSMEfinancingbycommercialbanks,microfinancialinstitutionsandcreditu n i o n s i n India.A n d i t washypothesizedt h a t therei s a p o s i t i v e relationshipbetweenInstitutionalfinanceandS M E growth.T h e s t u d y adopteda p o s i t i v i s t (quantitativeparadigm)
w i t h acrosssectionaldesign.Thefindingsinrespectofthemainpurposeofthestudyindicatedt h a
t a financiali n s t i t u t i o n makessignificantc o n t r i b u t i o n t o thegrowthanddevelopmento f S
M E s M o s t ofthefindingsprovesthat theSMEowner‟sperceptiontowardslendingstillremainasanissue.Thisstudyfindsitasoneofmajorreasonfor
thelackofcreditdemand.Sothisstudyalsoaimstoshedsomelightontheimportanceofentrepreneurialtraining,mutualloanguaranteeschemesandalsotheeffectiveimplementationandmonitoringofgovernmentmeasuresinSMElending
10
Trang 14s h a r e haslevelledofforf a l l e n i n m a n y countries,e s p e c i a l l y intermsofemployment.NowtheSmallandmedium-
sizedenterprisesreflectedtobeo n e o f t h e m a j o r d r i v i n g forcesi n e c o n o m i c growth.T h
e y m o t i v a t e p r i v a t e o w n e r s h i p andentrepreneurialtalents.MoregenerallytheSMEsindevelopingmarketsdependonmorelabor-
intensiveproductionpracticesthanlargeenterprises,improvingemploymentandleadingtomoreequitableincomedistribution(Luetkenhorst,2004)
However,Indialikeothercountries,SMEsplay avitalroleintheprocessofindustrial developmentandeconomic growthbyconsiderablycontributingto employmentcreation,i n c o m e generationandcatalyzinggrowthin urbanandruralareas(ShambhuGhatak2010p.3)
Withanimpressivehistoryofsmallfirmdevelopmentpolicy,inpost-IndependenceIndiaSMEsdominatetheindustrialscenariothroughitscontributiontogenerationofemploymentandi n c o m e asalsotacklingtheproblemofregionaldisparities(KeshabDas2008).Thepe
Trang 1511
Trang 16to94millionpeoplewithanetworkof37millionunits(Prof.H.L.NagaraMurthy2012).Despitei t scommendablec o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e nation‟se c onomy,S M E s e c t o r doesn o t gett h e requireds u
p p o r t fromt h e concernedbanks,financiali n s t i t u t i o n s , governmentdepartmentsando t h e rcorporate,whichisahandicapinbecomingmorecompetitiveintheNationalandInternationalmarkets.T h e c o u n t r i e s s m a l l andm e d i u m enterprisessectori s s e v e r e l y underfinanced.TraditionallendinginIndiaisalsolargelycollateralbased,relyingonsecurityvalueratherthanbusinessfundamentalsasthebasisforlendingdecisions(SimmiSareen2012).ToempowertheS M E sectortotakeitsrightfulplaceasthegrowthengineofIndianeconomy,itisnecessarytos u p p o r t t h e S M E
s , educateande m p o w e r t h e m t o m a k e o p t i m u m utilizationo f t h e resources,b o t h financeandeconomic toachievesuccess(VepaKamesam2003)
Therefore,themajorconcernofthisstudywasfocusedsolelyonassessingthefinancialproblemst h a
t a r e b e i n g facedbyIndianS M E s a n d cameo u t w i t h t h e p r o p o s e d strategiesf o r improvementsintheareaofgovernment,financialinstitutions aswellasidentifyingsomeoft h e gapsintheexistingknowledgerelatedtofinanceinsmallenterprisedevelopment.Forthepurposeof th is study,s a m
p l e s aretakenfromU t t a r Pradesha st at e locatedi n NorthernIndia,representing16.4%ofIndia‟spopu
ofpolicymakingdistrictsandi t providesemploymentopportunitiest o n e a r l y o n e
-t h i r d o f -t h e s-ta-tes-to-tall a b o r forceini-tssmallmediumscaleindus-triesincluding-tex-tilesandsugar-
refining.TheSMEsectoraccountsf o r almost6 0 % o ft he totali n d u s t r i a l o u t p u t i n U t t a r Pradesh.T h e st at e haso v e r 31 l a k h SMEunitsatpresent,accordingtothelatestcensus(2006-
2007).Outofthese,87,522unitsareregistered.A n A S S O C H A M s u r v e y r e p o r t s t h a t U t t
a r Pradeshhase m e r g e d ast h e t h i r d leadings t a t e i n facilitatinggrowthi n
t h e smallandm e d i u m enterprisessector.Thes u r v e y indicatesover30,000jobsweregeneratedinUPintheSMEsectorbetween2011and2013.Sot h e s m a l l andm e d i u m scalei n d u s t r i e s constituteani m p o r t a n t segmento f t he U P e c o n o m y intermsofemploymentgenerationandasasourceofforeignexchangeearningsthroughexports
1.2 Aimandoverallresearchquestions
Small andMediumEnterprises(SMEs)playaverysignificantrolein
theeconomyintermsofbalancedandsustainablegrowth,employmentgeneration,developmentofentrep
Trang 1712
Trang 18SMEsarenot ableto stand up to
thechallengesofglobalization,mainlybecauseofdifficultiesint h e areaoffinancing.With
theopeningup oftheIndianeconomy,ithasbecome necessarytoconsidermeasuresof
smootheningtheflowofcredit to thissector.(Y.sreenivas2005)
Butonthecontrary,itisoftensupposedthatmanyentrepreneursorSMEsthatdonotcurrentlyhaveaccesstofundswouldhavethecapabilitytousethosefundsproductivelyifthefundswereavailable;butmanystudiesrevealedduetomanyreasonsthefinancialsystemdoesnotprovidefinancetoSMEs.SoitisveryimportanttoascertainwhetherIndianSMEsaregettingadequateamountoflendingfromfinancialinstitutions
Thisobjective leadto thefirstresearchquestion (RQ1):
Whetheror not financial institutionsare providingadequatecreditsto SMEs?
Theprovisionoffinancet o t h e S m a l l andM e d i u m Enterprise( S M E ) segmenti s a t o p i c ofcrucialp o l i c y importance T o c u r e theoveralldiseaseoflacko f ap pr op ri at e growtho f IndianS
M E s –
SmallandMedium Enterprises,Indianeeds severals t r o n g remedies suchasadequatecreditd e l i
v e r y t o S M E s , betterr i s k m a n a g e m e n t , technologicalu p gradationo f Banks,andattitudinalchangeinBankersandsoon.Amongthem,themajorproblemofinadequatefinancingtoSMEsneedsanurgentattention(TarakShah&AnshuKhedkar2006).Thisstudyistherefore,importantonprovidingempiricalevidenceabouttheproblemsfacedbythesmallandm e d i u m enterprises.S o t h e rationalf o r t h e f o l l o w i n g questioni s toassessthefinancialbasedproblemsfacingsmall andmediumenterprisesinIndia
Trang 1913
Trang 20hypothesis.T h i s s t u d y a i m s t o proposea conceptualframeworkf o r s o l v i n g t h e problemsandanalyzingdata‟stoanswerproposed researchquestionsandproposedhypothesis.
1.3 Interestandsuitabilityoftheresearcher
Saundersetal
(2007)proposest h a t t h e d i s s e r t a t i o n t o p i c m u s t b e s o m e t h i n g researcheri s capableofundertakingandonethattheresearcherfeelsexcitementandenthusiasmfor,aswellashavingthenecessarycompetencytocomplete.Beingastudentoffinance,theresearcherhasaspecialinterestinstudyingSMEfinance.Throughadetailedanddeepresearch,theresearcherhasdevelopeda k e e n interesti
n understandingh o w t h e s e s m a l l businessesa c t u a l l y affecto u r economy.ThegrowthofSMEshavebeensaidtocombinethestrategiesofpovertyalleviationandindustrializationintoauniquepackagethatisbeneficialnotonlytoentrepreneursbuttothec o u n t r y atlarge.Ift h e s e arep r o v i d i n
g p l e n t y o f benefits,t h e n t h e q u e s t i o n remainst o b e answeredis:whySMEsarestillcontinuetofacechallengesingettinginstitutionalfinance?So,t h e researcherrealizedthepotentialandopportunityforthis topicto beexplored
Asapersonwhowouldlovetobecomeanentrepreneurinfuture,Researcherbelievesthattheknowledgegainedfromt h i s researchw o u l d n o t o n l y h e l p herbetteru n d e r s t a n d t h e s t a t u s o f S M
E s i n Indiabut wouldalsotraintheresearcherinstrategizingwhensheintend tostartup
1.4 Recipientsofresearch:
Therearef o u r m ai n recipientst o t h i s researchw h i c h i s carriedo u t asa parto f th e M as t e r of BusinessAdministrationinFinancein DublinBusinessSchool.Theyareasfollows
1 ThefirstandforemostrecipienttothisresearchisDublinBusinessSchoolwheretheresearcheris currentlypursuinghis MBA inFinance
2 ThesecondrecipienttothisresearchisLiverpoolJohnMoore‟sUniversity,whowillawardtheresearcherforherMaster‟sprogramme
Trang 213 ThethirdrecipienttothisresearchisMr.MichaelKealywhoisthesupervisorfortheresearcherandguidedherthroughoutthethesis.
4 ThefourthrecipientgrouptothisresearchincludestheIndianSMEs,relatedfinanciali n s t i
t u t i o n s andtheconcernedpolicymakers
1.5 Majorcontributionofthestudy
Themainaimofthisstudyistoprovidevaluablecontributionforthedevelopmentandsuccesso f theSMEsinIndia.Firstofall;researchthathasbeensubmittedinthisareaislimited.Avastn u m b e r
o f studiesareavailableintheissueofmicrofinanceassistancetoSMEs.butnotconsideringotherfinancialinstitutions.Remainingsomewereignoredthefinancialproblemsofs m a l l scalei n d u s t r i e s f
o r whichh a s a l i f e t i m e o f l e s s t h a n 5 years.Basedo n t h e availableevidenceresearcherattemptedamodestapproachtofilltheknowledgegapofexistingstudies.A n d alsos h e believesthatt h i sstudyw o u l d b e v e r y helpfulf o r o t h e r researchscholarsandprofessionalswhoaregatheringdata‟
s regardingthistopic
1.6 ResearchLimitations
Tocoveralltheregionsintheentirecountrywasimpossiblebecauseofthelimitedtimeframeandamounto f f u n d s f o r t h i s research.Fort h i s r e a s o n , t h e researchw i l l b e coveringU t t a r Pradesh,oneofthestateslocatedinNorthernIndia.Thechoiceofthisregionisduetothefactt h a t i t i s
t h e t h i r d leadings t a t e t o facilitategrowthi n S M E sector(AssociatedChambersofCommerceandIndustryofIndia2013).Researcherbelievesthatthiswillprovidegoodsourceofdataforthestudy.Butthisstudyfocusesonlyonthesmallandmediumsectorsofthebusiness.Microscaleenterprisesarenotincludedinthestudy.Anothermainlimitationofthisresearchisi t s chosenmethodofdatacollection,t
h e foremostobjectiveofquantitativeresearchistogeneralize.Ineveryquantitativeresearch,itmaynotbepossiblefortheresearchertostudythew h o l e population ofinterest.So,theresultsmaynotproducefullyreliableandaccuratefindings
15