Band gap energy of thefilm increased with increasing annealing temperature while the dielectric constant decreased.. The peaks of the heavy elements Zn, Se and Cu can be clearly sepa-rate
Trang 1Original Article
Elemental, structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline
a School of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan
b National Institute of Lasers and Optronics, P.O Nilore, 45650, Islamabad, Pakistan
c Experimental Physics Labs, National Centre for Physics, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 October 2016
Received in revised form
17 January 2017
Accepted 18 January 2017
Available online 25 January 2017
Keywords:
X-ray diffraction
Morphology
Dielectric constant
Spectroscopic ellipsometer
Energy band gap
a b s t r a c t
The elemental composition, film thickness and concentration depth profiles of as-deposited and annealed Zn1xCuxSefilms were studied by the Rutherford backscattering spectrometer (RBS) technique Thefilms were deposited on glass substrates by close spaced sublimation (CSS) technique As-deposited films of about 250e300 nm thickness were then annealed in air at temperatures of 200C and 400C for
1 h Structural characterization including crystal structure, crystal orientation, stacking fault energy (ҮSFE) and surface morphology were carried out by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force mi-croscopy (AFM) XRD studies revealed that the fabricatedfilms are polycrystalline with a zinc-blende structure and a strong (111) texture plane Surface roughness was observed to be enhanced with annealing temperature with a decrease in stacking fault energy (ҮSFE) Spectroscopic ellipsometry has been utilized for the estimation of band gap energy (Eg) and dielectric constant (ε1) Band gap energy of thefilm increased with increasing annealing temperature while the dielectric constant decreased
© 2017 The Authors Publishing services by Elsevier B.V on behalf of Vietnam National University, Hanoi This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
1 Introduction
Pursuant to the reported literature, ZnSe is the most prominent
material in optoelectronics and optical coating applications,
particularly in the UV region[1e8] It has a direct band gap of 2.7 eV
and its thin films are transparent over a wide range of visible
spectrum therefore, it is used as a window layer for the fabrication
of thinfilm solar cells[9] ZnSe based solar cells has an efficiency
greater than 11% by transmitting higher energy photons to the
absorber layer of the solar cell[10,11] A number of approaches have
been applied to tailor the physical properties of ZnSe thinfilms and
extract their peculiar properties[12e15] The properties of a thin
film are directly determined by composition, structure and
micro-structure which can be varied with growth conditions such as
growth temperature, layer thickness and composition as well[16]
In this work, physical properties of Cu enriched ZnSefilms with
different concentrations of Cu and annealed at 200C and 400C
temperature were studied in detail In order to obtain precise
knowledge of the structural and optical properties, one has to keep the exact composition and stoichiometry of the fabricated film layers especially for designing modern optoelectronic and optical devices Unfortunately, so far just the elemental composition and the thickness had been investigated for the Cu/ZnSefilms[17,18] without any insight description of the stoichiometry and struc-ture of interfaces for the deposited layers
Multiple approaches have been employed for the deposition of ZnSe:Cu films like lyothermal method[19]two-sourced thermal evaporation [20,21], spray pyrolysis deposition technique [22], layer-by-layer assembly with anionic and cationic alternating polymer layers [23], chemical synthesis[24], and chemical bath deposition[25] Irrespective of the deposition technique, investi-gation of the microstructure and morphology evolution in poly-crystalline Zn1 xCuxSe films is of key importance to develop a deeper understanding of the performance of devices employing these layers To characterize accurately such parameters, very diverse and in some cases very complicated diagnostic methods are needed Rutherford backscattering spectrometer (RBS) is a well established surface analyzing technique which can be used for element analysis and for depth profiles of major and minor con-stituents of thinfilms in the near-surface region[26]
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: shani_788@yahoo.com (M Arslan).
Peer review under responsibility of Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
Contents lists available atScienceDirect Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / j s a m d
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2017.01.004
2468-2179/© 2017 The Authors Publishing services by Elsevier B.V on behalf of Vietnam National University, Hanoi This is an open access article under the CC BY license
Trang 2Previously, we have reported the structural and optical analysis
of annealed Zn1xCuxSe thinfilms[27] In the present study, we
demonstrate several new results of the RBS analysis of the
depos-ited and annealedfilms using high-energy 2 MeV Heþion beams
from a pelletron tandem-type ion accelerator Qualitative and
quantitative information about stoichiometry and structure of
in-terfaces doped semiconductor as a function of depth, Cu
concen-tration and annealing effect has been discussed with further details
Results of this investigation have been correlated with the films
structural and optical properties Among the structural properties,
surface roughness and morphology, and crystalline quality of the
films have been obtained by using the XRD and AFM methods
Additionally, optical properties such as band gap tune-ability and
dielectric constant have been determined by spectroscopic
ellipsometer
2 Experimental
Zn1 -xCuxSe thinfilms were deposited on glass substrates by
close spaced sublimation technique at room temperature
Com-plete experimental detail for the deposition of the films and
annealing procedure is discussed somewhere else[27] In this study
a total of 15 samples for as-deposited and annealedfilms are
pre-sented according to Cu concentration as 0.00 x 0.20 as given in
Table 1
Film composition and concentration depth profiles were
determined through RBS Data for all the samples were recorded by
a 5 MeV pelletron tandem accelerator (5UDH-2, NEC) using a
2.023 MeV Heþcollimated beam (2 mm diameter) The sample was
mounted on afive-axis adjustable goniometer with an accuracy of
0.01in a vacuum chamber The backscattering ions were recorded
by a surface barrier detector (energy resolution is 25.8 keV)fixed at
a backscattering angle of 170 A beam integral connected with the
sample holder was used to receive charge on sample from beam
and make sure the experiments are comparable and repeatable
(dose 15 mC) The structural properties were examined by
PAN-alytical 3040/60 X, Pert PRO X-ray diffraction unit with CuKa
(0.154 nm) radiation Surface morphology of the samples was
studied by AFM (Quesant Universal SPM, Ambios Technology, USA)
(QScope™ 350) in non contact mode An AFM tip of silicon nitride
was used having an approximate radius of curvature 10 nm Both
topography and phase images were recorded simultaneously in the
scanning areas of 2e5mm2 All the images were collected in air at
scan rate of 1.0 Hz with 600 600 pixels resolution AFM images were analyzed by using Nova Px software (NT-MDT Co.) thus generating root mean square (RMS) surface roughness Spectro-scopic ellipsometer (J A Woolam M-200VI) was employed to determine the band gap energy (Eg) and dielectric constant (ε1) The ellipsometer consists of QTH lamp as the light source and a dual grating scanning monochromator (370e1670 nm) Incident light was focused on the sample at room temperature in air to determine the optical constants All the spectra were taken at an angle of incidence of 70
3 Results and discussion 3.1 Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) The Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) experiments were carried out for as-grown and annealed Zn1 xCuxSefilms of various compositions and thicknesses The collected RBS spectra were thenfitted by the code RUMP[28]tofind the relative con-centrations of various elements in thefilm.Fig 1(aec) shows the RBS spectra of as-grown and annealed films of Zn1xCuxSe (x¼ 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20) which shows that the simulated spectra of the depositedfilms are in good agreement with the measured data The energy spectrum of the emitted ion yields information about the concentration depth profiles The composition has been altered and copper was seemingly introduced into the ZnSe matrix
as a substitutional metallic participant as seen through RBS spectra and the data collected after RUMP code simulation The composi-tion of the samples was calculated and compared with the initial percentage which shows that composition is nearly stoichiometric and the accurate incorporation of added copper is observed The spectra shows that the depositedfilms mainly have a Zn(Cu)xSe chemical composition, with x varying from 0.10 to 0.20 at the surface region and then decreasing with depth The maximum concentration of the added Cu is present at the surface (~100e200 nm) layers It consists of three superimposed elemental yields of three atomic species at different channels Moreover, it can
be seen that there is no impurities or contamination in the as-depositedfilms though small percentage of oxygen and silicon is seen in the spectra which are coming from the substrate signal The peaks of the heavy elements (Zn, Se and Cu) can be clearly sepa-rated by the Heþbeam and can thus be used to determine the relative thickness of thefilms (by using the nominal density of the
Table 1
Film thickness and compositional analysis investigated by spectroscopic ellipsometer (SE) and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS) of Zn1xCu x Se thin films for various Cu concentrations (x).
M Arslan et al / Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices 2 (2017) 79e85 80
Trang 3bulk materials) as well as their stoichiometry The highest channel
number corresponds to the highest backscattered energy of Heþion
from the heaviest element Se present in the compound The peak
occurring at a channel below 950 is due to the silicon contained in
the glass substrate The energy channel correspondence to zinc is
1285; selenium is 1344 while for copper is 1152
After annealing the intensity of the RBS spectra increases and
become slightly broader This shows that annealing plays an
important part in altering thefilm thickness and prominent change
in elemental ratio with respect to stoichiometry within the layers
has been observed (shown inTable 1) As the progress in semi-conductor thinfilm technology is advancing, the thickness of de-vice circuits is becoming very thinner and thinner Therefore, an accurate measurement forfilm thickness is required For thin tar-gets, the scattering is proportional to the target thickness Angular frequency changes as the mass of the constituent's changes within the sample from which we can estimate the thickness accurately by using RBS The broadness observed in the RBS peaks with increasing annealing temperature indicates the increase in thick-ness of thefilms[29] It was noticed that a protuberant peak occurs
at ~1152 elemental yield for copper content which is only promi-nent for 0.20 Cu as shown inFig 1(c) This peak arises due to the excessive enrichment of Cu in the ZnSe matrix and corresponds to the unbound Cu content which subsists on the surface By increasing annealing temperature this peak shows declination and fades at 400C annealed temperature From this it is certain that Cu diffuses into ZnSe matrix with increasing annealing temperature According to the RUMP simulation, thefilms annealed at 400C exhibits the most homogeneous Cu concentration as a function of depth compared with the other studied samples The thickness of thefilms determined by RBS technique, quartz crystal and spec-troscopic ellipsometry were in good agreement Moreover, the depositedfilms were uniform and well adherent with the substrate The analyzed compositions and thicknesses of the compositefilms are shown inTable 1
3.2 Structural studies 3.2.1 XRD results
To investigate the crystal structure, composition and phase, as-deposited and annealed Zn1xCuxSe thinfilms were characterized
by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) The X-ray diffraction pattern of pristine and heat treatedfilms are shown inFig 2(a,b) which shows that the crystal planes are preferentially orientated along the (111) plane with zinc-blende structure.Fig 2(a) shows the XRD pattern
of the Zn1 xCuxSe films annealed at 400 C with two different copper concentrations (0.00 and 0.15) whileFig 2(b) shows XRD pattern of as-deposited and annealed (200 C and 400 C)
Zn1 xCuxSe thinfilms for 0.05 Cu concentration XRD graphs indi-cate that the increase of annealing temperature leads to improve-ment of the thinfilms growth in the (111) plane orientation This is due to the decrease in film stresses and grain coarsening as described in detail in our published paper[27]
It is observed that the annealing temperature of 200 C and
400 C did not affect the predominant (111) crystallographic texture No secondary phase is observed after annealing, however, the intensity of (111) peaks increases with the annealing temper-ature This increase of the peak intensity is due to the improvement
of clusters, relocation of atoms and elimination of defects formed during thefilm deposition After annealing, the intensity of (220) and (311) reflection decreases while the preferred orientation in (111) direction increases radically at 400C Slight modification of the crystal structure is observed by annealing at temperature of
200 C however the crystal structure changes significantly after annealing at 400C A small decrease in diffracting angle 2qfor 0.15 annealed at 400 C is also observed which confirms that after annealing the grains are recrystallized and coalescence is assumed
to happen
Fig 3shows the effect of annealing on the FWHM andҮSFEfor (111) orientation FWHM can be increased or decreased depending
on coalescence and recrystallization of grains Recrystallization may help (111) orientation and peak growth, making the FHWM smaller It is observed that FWHM and ҮSFE decrease with increasing annealing temperature, which is mainly due to grain growth and improvement in crystallinity.Ү for the as-deposited Fig 1 Rutherford backscattering spectra of as-deposited and annealed (200 C and
400C) Zn1xCu x Se (a) 0.10, (b) 0.15, (c) 0.20 films.
Trang 4and annealed films is calculated for (111) plane by using the
relation[30]
"
2p2
45ð3 tanqÞ1=2
#
where‘q’ is the Bragg's angle and ‘b’ is the full width half maxima
(FWHM) The stacking fault energies (Ү ) were calculated from
Fig 2 XRD pattern of (a) 400C annealed Zn1xCu x Se (0.00, 0.15) and (b) as-deposited
and annealed (200C and 400C) Zn1xCu x Se (0.05) thin films.
Fig 3 Variations of full width half maxima (FWHM) and Stacking fault energy ( Ү SFE ) of
as-deposited and annealed (200 C and 400C) Zn1xCu x Se thin films with Cu
concentration.
Fig 4 AFM 2-D and 3-D images of (aeb) as-deposited, (ced) 200 C annealed and (eef) 400 C annealed Zn1xCu x Se (0.00 and 0.10) thin films.
M Arslan et al / Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices 2 (2017) 79e85 82
Trang 5the shift of the peaks of the X-ray lines of thefilms with reference to
the 2003 JCPDS database No: 89-7130, using Eq.(1)
ҮSFEalso decreases gradually with increasing copper
concen-tration up to 0.10 and crystal growth becomes sharp while an
opposite trend is observed beyond this Cu concentration The
minimum values ofҮSFEare obtained at 0.10 and 400C annealed
temperature while the maximum at 0.20 Cu concentration The
smaller value of theҮSFE(0.0377 J/m2) obtained at 0.10 Cu exhibits
excellent crystalline quality of CuxZn1 xSefilms There is no report
on theҮSFEof Zn1 xCuxSe thinfilms deposited by closed space
sublimation technique All the structural parameters are
summa-rized inTable 1
3.2.2 AFM results
The morphology of as-deposited and annealed samples have
been analyzed with the help of AFM diagnostic tool The
topog-raphy of the surface in 2D and 3D image is shown inFig 4for all
samples with a root mean square (RMS) roughness are listed in
Table 2.Fig 4(a,b) indicates the surface morphology of as-deposited
Zn1xCuxSe (x¼ 0.00, 0.10) films.Fig 4(a) presents a low roughness
surface with an RMS value of 1.12 nm for 0.00 Cu concentration
film, over a scan size of 2mm2, which suggests the formation of very
smooth surface The roughness increases to 1.39 nm for 0.10 Cu
concentration The increase in RMS roughness with Cu is due to the
grain growth and improved crystallinity as corroborated from our
XRD results These formations are in agreement with those
re-ported by Mazon-Montijo et al for CdSfilms[31]
Fig 4(cef) shows the surface morphology of the annealed
Zn1xCuxSe (x¼ 0.00, 0.10) thin films at 200 and 400C over a scan
size of 5mm2 A careful comparison between both annealed samples
reveals that the micro features on the 400C annealedfilm surface
are almost similar in shape to 200C annealedfilms except size of the
particles are reduced after 400C annealing The islands formed on
the surface of thefilms annealed at 400C shows more improvement
in particle size along withfiner micro-asperities The addition of Cu
contents and annealing enhance the grain growth and roughness
This is useful for solar cell applications as rough surface trap more
light Light trapping is widely used to enhance the absorption in the
absorber layer of thinfilm solar cells and therefore to increase the
current density The most prevalent light-trapping technology is
introducing nano-textured interfaces into the solar cells[32]
3.3 Spectroscopic ellipsometry
Spectroscopic ellipsometer has been employed to determine the
band gap (E) and dielectric constant (ε) of our target thinfilms A
beam of polarized light is illuminated onto the sample and polar-ization change is measured from reflection spectra The polariza-tion change in the reflection signal is measured and then characterized by two quantities, psi (J) and delta (D) parameters for amplitude and phase changes respectively
tanðjÞ$eiD¼rrp
where tan (J) is the magnitude of the reflectivity ratio, rpis the
reflectivity for p-polarized light and rs is the reflectivity for s-polarized light The experimental psi (j) and delta (D) spectra were recorded as a function of wavelength over the range (400e800) nm
at an incidence angle of 70 These parameters are correlated with thinfilm optical properties by the above expression and then make
a comparison between the experimental and simulated data by utilizingfitting functions[33]
The extinction coefficient (k) and refractive index (n) measured ellipsometry data already reported for the same samples in our published paper[27] However, in this article we determined the band gap energy by using extinction coefficient (k) spectra obtained from Ellipsometer The optical band gap energy (Eg) was calculated using the following relations
a¼ 4pk=l
ahn2¼ AEg hn whereais the absorption coefficient, h is Planck's constant,yis frequency and A is proportionality constant To estimate the band gap of thesefilms, (ahn)2was plotted against hyusing the above equation for as-deposited and annealedfilms of different compo-sitions Extrapolation of the linear portion to the (ahn)2¼ 0 axis gives the value of band gap energy as shown inFig 5(aec) For all compositions, the band gap energy increases with annealing tem-perature as shown in Fig 5(aec), while decreases with the in-creases of Cu concentration in the ZnSe matrix as shown inFig 5c (inset) Our calculated values of optical band gap by spectroscopic ellipsometer are slightly greater than reported by J Kvietkova et al and Dahmani et al by using spectroscopic ellipsometer[34,35] The band gap energies estimated by SE technique is significantly different than transmission data The reason for this is that the
reflectivity obtained by the SE is very different from that of optical probing via a spectrophotometer in terms of the spatial fre-quencies Moreover, measurement of the optical parameters by the
SE requires large-scale approximation for thefitting of the model
Table 2
Peak position (2q), full width half maxima (FWHM), stacking fault energy (SFE), Band gap (E g ) and mean square roughness (RMS) of as-deposited and annealed (200 C and
400 C) Zn1xCu x Se thin films for various Cu concentrations (x).
Cu concentration Nature of films 2qdeg [27] FWHM (2q) Stacking fault energy (J/m 2 ) Band gap (eV) Roughness (nm)
Trang 6while transmission is real time measurement Comparing the SE
and RBSfilm thickness, the thickness is approximately 5% greater
than those calculated by the RBS as listed inTable 1 This variation
in thefilm thickness by the two different techniques is due to the
diversity in thefitting software's and the mode of simulating the data
Furthermore, dielectric quantity (ε1) of Zn1 xCuxSe films ob-tained from the ellipsometryfit is shownFig 6(aec) ε1is the real part of the complex dielectric function,ε ¼ ε1þ ίε2which represents how much a material is polarized due to creation of electric dipoles
Fig 5 Band gap energy of as-deposited and annealed (200C and 400C) Zn 1x Cu x Se
(a) 0.00, (b) 0.05, (c) 0.15 films, determined from k-spectra Inset in Fig 6 (c) shows the
variations of band gap energy of as-deposited and annealed (200 C and 400 C)
Zn1xCu x Se films with copper concentration.
Fig 6 Dielectric constant ( 3 1 ) of as-deposited and annealed Zn1xCu x Se (a) 0.00 (b) 0.05, (c) 0.20 films, determined by spectroscopic ellipsometer Inset in Fig 6 (c) shows the variations of dielectric constant of as-deposited and annealed (200C and 400C)
Zn Cu Se films with copper concentration.
M Arslan et al / Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices 2 (2017) 79e85 84
Trang 7in the material by applying electricfield Change in the polarization
of any material directly affects the dielectric properties of the
ma-terial This change in the dielectric constant is measured by the
fitting of ellipsometry parameters psi (j) and delta (D) SE measures
the dielectric constant (ε1) by the following equation[36]
Dielectric studies show that the dielectric constant (ε1) values
decrease with increasing annealing temperature as shown in
Fig 6(aec), while increases with Cu contents addition as depicted
in Fig 6c (inset) Post-annealing treatment of films plays an
important role and considerably affects the dielectric properties of
the prepared Zn1 xCuxSe films The decrease in the dielectric
constant with annealing temperature may be due to the lower
compactness of annealed ZnSefilms than as-deposited ZnSe films
Similar results have been reported for annealed ZnSe films by
Venkatachalam et al.[37]
4 Conclusion
The effect of post deposition thermal annealing on the
compo-sitional stoichiometry and depth concentration of deposited layers
of Zn1 xCuxSe thin films was investigated by RBS technique By
increasing the annealing temperature of films from 200 C to
400C the physical properties have improved significantly
Varia-tions in stoichiometry found with RBS technique is complemented
by micro analysis characterizations performed by XRD and AFM,
while the optical results obtained by using SE XRD data predicts
the improvement of crystallinity with an increase in FWHM value
while stacking fault energy decreases with increasing annealing
temperature AFM suggests the formation of very smooth surface;
larger grains are replaced by smaller and fine grains
(micro-as-perities) at 400C accompanied by an increase in surface
rough-ness Spectroscopic ellipsometry analysis reveals that the bang gap
increases while dielectric constant decreases with the increase in
annealing temperature
References
[1] O Schulz, M Strassburg, T Rissom, U.W Pohl, D Bimberg, M Klude,
D Hommel, Post growth p-type doping enhancement for ZnSe-based lasers
using a Li 3 N interlayer, Appl Phys Lett 81 (2002) 4916
[2] P Mahawela, G Sivaraman, S Jeedigunta, J Gaduputi, M Ramalingam,
S Subramanian, S Vakkalanka, C.S Ferekides, D.L Morel, IIeVI compounds as
the top absorbers in tandem solar cell structures, Mater Sci Eng B 116 (2005)
283
[3] P.K Kalita, B.K Sarma, H.L Das, Structural characterization of vacuum
evap-orated ZnSe thin films, Bull Mater Sci 23 (2000) 313
[4] S Venkatachalam, S Agilan, D Mangalaraj, S.K Narayandass, Optoelectronic
properties of ZnSe thin films, Mater Sci Semicond Process 10 (2007) 128
[5] X Zhang, K.M Yu, C.X Kronawitter, Z Ma, P.Y Yu, S.S Mao, Heavy p-type
doping of ZnSe thin films using Cu 2 Se in pulsed laser deposition, Appl Phys.
Lett 101 (2012) 042107
[6] T Shirakawa, Effect of defects on the degradation of ZnSe-based white LEDs,
Mater Sci Eng B 91e92 (2002) 470
[7] M Godlewski, E Guziewicz, K Kooalko, E Lusakowska, E Dynowska,
M.M Godlewski, E.M Goldys, M.R Phillips, Origin of white color light
emis-sion in ALE grown ZnSe, J Lumin 102e103 (2003) 455
[8] M Drechsler, B.K Meyer, D.M Hofmann, P Ruppert, D Hommel, Optically
detected cyclotron resonance properties of high purity ZnSe epitaxial layers
grown on GaAs, Appl Phys Lett 71 (1997) 1116
[9] S Venkatachalam, D Mangalaraj, S.K Narayandass, K Kim, J Yi, Structure,
optical and electrical properties of ZnSe thin films, Phys B Condens Matter.
358 (2005) 27
[10] A Ennaoui, S Siebentritt, M Ch Lux-Steiner, W Riedl, F Karg, High-efficiency
Cd free CIGSS thin-film solar cells with solution grown zinc compound buffer
layers, Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 67 (2001) 31
[11] W Eisele, A Ennaoui, P Schubert-Bischoff, M Giersig, C Pettenkofer,
J Krauser, M Lux-Steiner, S Zweigart, F Karg, XPS, TEM and NRA in-vestigations of Zn(Se,OH)/Zn(OH) 2 films on Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se) 2 substrates for highly efficient solar cells, Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 75 (2003) 17 [12] M.G.M Choudhury, M.R Islam, M.M Rahman, M.O Hakim, M.K.R Khan, K.J Kao, G.R Lai, Preparation and characterization of ZnSe:Al thin films, Acta Phys Slovaca 54 (2004) 417e425
[13] M Lohar, J.V Thombare, S.K Shinde, U.M Chougale, V.J Fulari, Preparation and characterization iron doped zinc selenide thin film by electrodeposition,
J Shivaji Univ Sci Technol 41 (2015) ISSN: 0250e5347 [14] Y Xi, L El Bouanani, Z Xu, M.A Quevedo-Lopez, M Minary-Jolandan, Solu-tion-based Ag-doped ZnSe thin films with tunable electrical and optical properties, J Mater Chem C 3 (2015) 9781e9788
[15] J.E Willaims, R.P Camata, V.V Fedorov, S.B Mirov, Pulsed laser deposition of chromium-doped zinc selenide thin films for mid-infrared applications, Appl Phys A 91 (2008) 333e335
[16] T Matsumoto, T Iuima, H Goto, Low pressure VPE of In-doped ZnSe with controlled electrical properties, J Cryst Growth 99 (1990) 427
[17] S Venkatachalam, D Mangalaraj, S.K Narayandass, S Velumani, P.S Retchkiman, J.A Ascencio, Structural studies on vacuum evaporated ZnSe/ p-Si Schottky diodes, Mater Chem Phys 103 (2007) 305
[18] R Salonen, A Seppala, T Ahlgren, E Rauhala, J Raisanen, Characteristics of PIXE channeling and its application to ZnSe thin films, Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 145 (1998) 539
[19] Pushpendra Kumar, Kedar Singh, Ferromagnetism in Cu-doped ZnSe semi-conducting quantum dots, J Nanoparticle Res 13 (2011) 1613e1620 [20] Z Ali, A.K.S Aqili, A Maqsood, S.M.J Akhtar, Properties of Cu-doped low resistive ZnSe films deposited by two-sourced evaporation, Vacuum 80 (2005) 302e309
[21] M Orita, T Narushima, H Yanagita, Transparent conductive Cu-doped ZnSe film deposited at room temperature using compound sources followed by laser annealing, Jpn J Appl Phys 46 (40) (2007) L976eL978
[22] G.M Lohar, S.K Shinde, V.J Fulari, Structural, morphological, optical and photoluminescent properties of spray-deposited ZnSe thin film, J Semicond.
35 (11) (2014) 113001 [23] E Hao, H Zhang, B Yang, H Ren, J Shen, Preparation of luminescent polyelectrolyte/Cu-doped ZnSe nanoparticle multilayer composite films,
J Colloid Interface Sci 238 (2001) 285e290 [24] J.F Suyver, T.V Beek, S.F Wuister, J.J Kelly, A Meijerink, Luminescence of nanocrystalline ZnSe:Cu, Appl Phys Lett 79 (25) (2001) 4222
[25] C.A Estrada, R.A Zingaro, E.A Meyers, P.K Nair, M.T.S Nair, Modification of chemically deposited ZnSe thin films by ion exchange reaction with copper ions in solution, Thin Solid Films 247 (1994) 208e212
[26] W.K Chu, J.W Mayer, M.A Nicolet, Backscattering Spectrometry, Academic Press, New York, 1978
[27] M Arslan, R Muhammad, A Mahmood, R Rasheed, Effect of thermal annealing on the physical properties of Zn 1x Cu x Se thin films deposited by close spaced sublimation technique, Acta Metall Sin Engl Lett 26 (2013) 699 [28] L.R Doolittle, Algorithms for the rapid simulation of Rutherford backscat-tering spectra, Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 9 (1985) 344
[29] A Kitahara, S Yasuno, K Fujikawa, Study of thin-film thickness and density by high-resolution Rutherford backscattering spectrometry and X-ray reflectiv-ity, Trans Mater Res Soc Jpn 34 (2009) 613
[30] T Mahalingam, V Dhanasekaran, R Chandramohan, Jin-Koo Rhee, Micro-structural properties of electrochemically synthesized ZnSe thin films,
J Mater Sci 47 (2012) 1950e1957 [31] D.A Mazon-Montijo, M Sotelo-Lerma, L Rodriguez-Fernandez, L Huerta, AFM, XPS and RBS studies of the growth process of CdS thin films on ITO/glass substrates deposited using an ammonia-free chemical process, Appl Surf Sci.
256 (2010) 4280 [32] H.W Deckman, C.R Wronski, H Witzke, E Yablonovitch, Optically enhanced amorphous silicon solar cells, Appl Phys Lett 42 (1983) 968e970 [33] M Arslan, A Maqsood, A Mahmood, A Iqbal, Structural and optical properties
of copper enriched ZnSe thin films prepared by closed space sublimation technique, Mater Sci Semicond Process 16 (2013) 1797
[34] J Kvietkova, B Daniel, M Hetterich, M Schubert, D Spemann, Optical prop-erties of ZnSe and Zn 0.87 Mn 0.13 Se epilayers determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry, Thin Solid Films 455e456 (2004) 228
[35] R Dahmani, L Salamanca Riba, N.V Nguyen, D.C Horowitz, B.T Jonker, Determination of the optical constants of ZnSe films by spectroscopic ellips-ometry, J Appl Phys 76 (1994) 514
[36] E.F Schubert, J.K Kim, J.Q Xi, Low refractive index materials: a new class of optical thin film materials, Phys Status Solidi B 244 (2007) 3002
[37] S Venkatachalam, D Soundararajan, P Peranantham, D Mangalaraj, S.K Narayandass, S Velumani, P Schabes-Retchkiman, Spectroscopic ellips-ometry (SE) studies on vacuum evaporated ZnSe thin films, Mater Charact 58 (2007) 715