The right to freedom of enterprise: reflection from the banking sector in Vietnam

The requirement that credit institutions and foreign bank branches in Vietnam take self- responsibility for their business results in Clause 1, Article 7 of the 2010 Law on Credit Instit[r]

THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ENTERPRISE:

REFLECTION FROM THE BANKING SECTOR IN VIETNAM

Pham Thi Hong Nghia 1

PhD Candidate, School of Law, Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Abstract

The right to freedom of enterprise is recognized in Article 33 of Vietnam Constitution 2013, according

to which all entities, including individuals and organizations, have the right to do business in the

sectors and trades that are not prohibited by law The right to freedom of enterprise inherited from the

Constitutions of 1946, 1959, 1980 and 1992 and continuing to be recognized in the 2013 Constitution

shows the constant attention that Vietnam has paid attention to the economic development of different

entities in the society However, the banking sector always carries high systematic risks; only one credit

institution at risk may lead to the collapse of the whole system of credit institutions, the banking sector,

and even a national economy or the world economy As a result, in addition to recognizing the right

to freedom of enterprise of business entities in the banking sector, the state also needs regulations to

limit the rights to ensure the stability and development of the money market, the banking system, the

economy of the sector considered as “lifeblood” of the national economy

This paper aims to illuminate on the debate about the protection of the right to freedom of enterprise

in the banking sector by exploring two sets of issues The first is how to recognize the right to freedom

of enterprise in the banking sector under Vietnam law The second area for investigation is the nature

of constitutional protection, the meaning of the limit in the right to enterprise, freedom in the banking

sector, and how the protection is typically provided for this right The paper will tackle these issues

based primarily on the analysis of the provisions of the 2013 Constitution and the 2010 Law on Credit

Institutions It is concluded that the right to the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector is a basic

right, but shall be limited to ensure a stable and sustainable development of the banking sector.

Keywords: freedom of enterprise; banking sector; limited rights, Vietnam

1 The right to freedom of enterprise, according to Vietnam law

1.1 The recognition of the law on the right to freedom of enterprise in the banking sector

Mentioning enterprise is referring to freedom of agreement, so the demand for freedom of enterprise exists in any economy, although the guarantee of the right varies in different historical and

1 This paper is a part of the doctoral thesis titled STATE MANAGEMENT IN BANKING SECTOR/ QUẢN LÝ NHÀ NƯỚC TRONG LĨNH VỰC NGÂN HÀNG that PhD Candidate PHAM THI HONG NGHIA is working on at the School of Law, Vietnam National University, Hanoi.

social periods The Constitutions in 1946, 1959 and 1980 did not explicitly recognized the right to freedom of enterprise, freedom, and this right was then somehow limited Among human rights, the right to freedom of enterprise is the right that was had been determined right from the first Constitution

of Vietnam in 1946, through the indirect recognition of the protection of citizens’ property ownership rights1 By the 1959 Constitution and the 1980 Constitution, due to the policy of developing a planned, centralized economy and the existence of only two basic economic sectors, namely the state economics and the collective economics, the right to freedom of enterprise and operation of non-state economics were not encouraged2 It was not until the 1992 Constitution that citizens’ right to freedom

of enterprise was officially recognized in Article 57: “The citizen enjoys freedom of enterprise as

determined by law” However, it was the 2013 Constitution that created a stronger breakthrough

concerning the right to freedom of enterprise as asserted in Article 33: “Everyone has the right to

freedom of enterprise in the sectors and trades that are not prohibited by law” This regulation covers

two important contents: firstly, to confirm the right to freedom of enterprise of all people; secondly,

to limit the freedom of enterprise in areas prohibited by law

Concretising the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector, the banking law of Vietnam has also demonstrated recognitions in accordance with the above Constitutions Although the state began

to recognize banking business in 1951 with the Ordinance No 15/1951 of President Ho Chi Minh establishing the State Bank of Vietnam, like other businesses in the planned centralized economy, the right to freedom of enterprise in the banking sector was just the freedom of doing business of the State Bank of Vietnam with state-owned enterprises and cooperatives However, the introduction of the Ordinance on Banks, Credit Cooperatives and Financial Companies in 1990 with the recognition

of the existence of joint-stock commercial banks, foreign banks, and joint-venture banks, the right to freedom of enterprise of legal entities was expanded This is not only the freedom of doing business

of the State Bank of Vietnam but also of other banking business entities, although this freedom is still limited due to the procedures for obtaining permission from the State Bank of Vietnam

The change of the right to freedom of enterprise in the banking sector was marked by the 1997 Law on Credit Institutions when the State affirmed for the first time the business autonomy of credit institutions3 Such provision has created conditions for credit institutions to freely conduct business activities as well as affirmed the State’s guarantee of the right to ownership of business results for credit institutions Inheriting this provision, the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions continued to affirm that the right to freedom of enterprise

of credit institutions is recognized, protected and guaranteed through the law provision on business autonomy of credit institutions, affirming the state’s protection of business results and the requirement that

no organization or individual be allowed to interfere illegally and business autonomy

1 Article 12 of the 1946 Constitution states: “Personal property ownership right of Vietnamese citizens are guaranteed”

2 Article 12 of the 1959 Constitution: “ The state economy is in the form of the ownership of the entire people, plays

a leading role in the national economy and is guaranteed by the State for priority development…”; Article 13 of the

1959 Constitution: “Cooperative economy is in the form of collective ownership of working people Cooperative economy is in the form of collective ownership of working people The State particularly encourages, guides and helps the development of the cooperative economy”; Article 18 of the 1980 Constitution: “… The state economy plays a key role in the national economy and is given priority to develop”.

3 Article 15 of the 1997 Law on Credit Institutions: “Credit institutions have the right to be independent from doing business and take responsibility for their business results No organization or individual may illegally interfere in the business autonomy of credit institutions Credit institutions have the right to refuse requests for credit granting, capital contribution, and provision of banking services if they find it ineligible, ineffective and inconsistent with law”.

Thus, the freedom of enterprise is considered under two following unified aspects: (i) The freedom of enterprise is the right of subjects/entities, covering a range of acts that subjects are allowed

to conduct, such as: (i) Selecting business lines, selecting the type of business, scale of business, selecting customers; (ii) The right to freedom of enterprise is also understood as a combination of all regulations and legal guarantees issued by the State in order to facilitate individuals (or legal entities)

to exercise the right mentioned above1

In the banking sector, the freedom of enterprise is also understood in two aspects:

Firstly, freedom of enterprise in the banking sector is the right of banking business entities

to perform the following acts: selecting the type of operation (banks, financial companies, leasing, finance companies, microfinance institutions, people’s credit funds); choosing the business model (joint-stock company or limited liability company); selecting the scope of operation (receiving deposits; lending; financial leasing ); choosing clients; and so on

Secondly, freedom of enterprise in the banking sector is also reflected in the provisions and legal

guarantees issued by the State in order to facilitate banking business entities to exercise the above selection rights such as: Providing a series of documents guiding the implementation of each specific activity of credit institutions2 In particular, ensuring the implementation conditions of the state plays

a very important role, being the basis for the freedom of doing enterprise in the banking sector

1.2 Contents ensuring the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector

The freedom of enterprise in the banking sector is a system of rights attached to banking business entities; the assurance of the freedom of enterprise for these entities is shown in the following contents:

- Ensuring the freedom to participate in enterprise in the banking sector

Ensuring the right to freedom of participating in the enterprise is the basic content in banking enterprise because this is the basis for entities to start an enterprise and to be recognized by the state as entities through business registration In order to ensure the right to participate in enterprise

in the banking sector, the state has: (i) introduced a variety of business organization models for entities to choose from, such as joint-stock companies and liability limited companies (multi-member limited liability companies, one-member limited liability companies with wholly state-owned charter capital)3; (ii) prescribed clear, specific and convenient procedures for establishing, licensing, and business registration such as laying down clear requirements concerning the license application documents, deadlines for returning documents, and responsibility to respond explicitly in writing if the license application is refused 4…

- Ensuring the right to autonomously resolve internal problems in the banking enterprise

This assurance is recognized in Clause 1, Article 7 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions: “Credit institutions and foreign bank branches have autonomy in their business activities” Accordingly, in

1 Bui Ngoc Cuong, Discussing about business freedom, Law Review No 3, 1997.

2 See also Circular No 39/2016/TT-NHNN regulating lending activities of credit institutions and foreign bank branches

to clients; Circular No 48/2018/TT- NHNN regulating the Savings Deposit…

3 See also Article 6 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

4 See also Article 5 of Circular No 40/2011/TT-NHNN prescribing the license issuance, organization and operation

of commercial banks, foreign bank branches, representative offices of foreign credit institutions and other foreign institutions engaging in banking activities in Vietnam.

order for the business to be done most effectively, the State ensures that banking business entities have the right to resolve issues by themselves through the recognition in the charter concerning: hiring and using labour; selecting partners in cases of syndication (such as loan syndication, bank guarantee syndication), selecting clients; deciding to continue business or to terminate a business; deciding to expand or narrow the business; deciding on the distribution of profits, the division of management rights; deciding to resolve internal disputes and resolve external disputes; mobilizing capital in the business process, whereby the entities are entitled to decide whether to increase or decrease the charter capital; ways to increase loans through various capital mobilization channels (receiving deposits, issuing valuable papers, borrowing from other credit institutions, borrowing from the State Bank of Vietnam)1

- Ensuring the freedom of contract in the banking enterprise

All banking business activities from the beginning of a business, during the course of business,

as well as at business closure, must be passed under different types of contracts such as capital contribution contracts (to start a business), labour contracts, credit contracts, loan contracts Therefore, ensuring the freedom of contract is also the basis to ensure other rights in the freedom of doing business in the banking sector Ensuring the freedom of contract is the assurance of the following aspects: (i) no one has the right to intervene or impose on the signing of contracts of banking business entities; (ii) banking business entities have the right to select partners in the contracts they sign (even when choosing clients, choosing employees and choosing cooperative partners); (iii) banking business entities are entitled to the right to negotiate measures to assure contract performance such

as mortgage of assets, third party mortgages when lending to clients; (iv) banking business entities are free to negotiate changes in some contents of the signed contract such as changing the purpose of using capital for clients, rescheduling the repayment period for clients2…

- Ensuring the right of property ownership during the course of banking enterprise

The requirement that credit institutions and foreign bank branches in Vietnam take self-responsibility for their business results in Clause 1, Article 7 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions has affirmed that the State of Vietnam guarantees the right of property ownership for entities doing business in the banking sector This regulation serves as a premise for the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector because only when the property ownership, the business results are guaranteed, can other rights to freedom such as freedom to establish credit institutions, freedom of contract, freedom

of competition be implemented

- Ensuring freedom of competition in the banking sector

In the rules of the market economy, competition is one of the basic rules, playing an important role in the process of making the economy healthy, promoting the development of the economy, and the banking sector is not an exception The state’s guarantee of freedom of competition in the

banking sector is affirmed in Clause 1, Article 9 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions: “1 Credit

institutions and foreign bank branches may cooperate and compete in banking operations and other business activities under the law; 2 Competition restriction or unfair competition threatening to harm

1 See also Clause 1, Article 31 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

2 See also Article 15, Article 19 of Circular No 39/2016/TT-NHNN prescribing lending activities of credit institutions and foreign bank branches to clients.

or harming the implementation of the national monetary policy, the safety of the credit institution system, the interests of the State and the lawful rights and interests of organizations and individuals are prohibited” Ensuring the freedom of competition includes the following aspects: ensuring the

conditions for banking business entities to compete fairly; controlling anti-monopoly of banking business, especially upon amalgamation, consolidation, acquisition of credit institutions; imposing strict sanctions on anti-competitive practices and unfair competition practices in the banking sector; The State Bank of Vietnam has an interest rate control mechanism (important element in the output and input of the products provided by credit institutions, foreign bank branches)1

- Ensuring the freedom of decision in resolving disputes in the banking sector

When banking business entities freely enter contracts, freely conduct business, conflicts and disagreements leading to disputes are unavoidable When disputes in the banking sector occur, the law secures the right to freedom of decision by the provisions allowing credit institutions to set rules for resolving their disputes in the Charter of the credit institutes2 Normally, when exercising this right of freedom, credit institutions will be free to agree on methods of resolving disputes through negotiation, mediation, via commercial arbitration or by the courts

The 2013 Constitution recognized the right to freedom of enterprise and the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions; the documents guiding the implementation of the Law have specified the recognition

of the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector and measures to protect the freedom of enterprise

in the banking sector However, for some reasons such as to limit risks to the national economy, to protect property ownership for other entities… the law also has regulations to limit the right besides ones to recognize and ensure it

2 Limiting the right of freedom of enterprise in the banking sector in Vietnam today

2.1 The reason for limiting the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector

The state has set limits on freedom of enterprise in the banking sector due to the following reasons:

- Restricting the right to freedom of enterprise in the banking sector to ensure other constitutional rights

Freedom of enterprise is one of the basic human rights recognized and protected by law However, as the reality shows, one’s freedom of doing business may restrict others’ freedom of doing business Therefore, setting the limits of freedom of enterprise in general and freedom of enterprise

in the banking sector in particular is the way in which the State ensures that the right to freedom of enterprise of different entities can coexist and be simultaneously promoted Therefore, right after recognizing the right to freedom of enterprise in Article 33 of the 2013 Constitution, the State also sets the limit of the right to be applied only “in sectors that are not prohibited by law” In addition, according to Clause 2 Article 14 and Clause 4, Article 15 of the 2013 Constitution, the exercise of

1 Article 12 of the 2010 Law on the State Bank of Vietnam states: “The Stale Bank shall announce the refinancing interest rate, prime interest rate and other interest rates to serve the regulation of the monetary policy and the fight against usury; In case abnormal developments are seen in the monetary market, the State Bank shall provide for a mechanism for regulating interest rates applicable to credit institutions in their relations with others and their clients and in other credit relations”.

2 See also Point 1, Clause 1, Article 31 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

the right to freedom of enterprise in the banking sector may not infringe upon national interests and others’ lawful rights and interests, and due to national defence, national security, social order and safety, social morality and community well-being, the State has the right to limit the freedom of enterprise by a law1

- The banking sector always involves high risks and may cause systematic risks and threaten national interests and legitimate interests of other entities

Credit institutions in the world or in Vietnam play the role of a hub for capital transfer to the economy with a high level of capital investment, so there are many high potential risks 2 such as clients’ failure or inability to perform part or the whole of debt repayment obligations under contracts

or agreements; credit institutions’ inability to fulfil their debt repayment obligations on due date; or credit institutions able to fulfil its debt repayment obligations when due but having to pay a high cost

to perform such obligations …3

In particular, the banking sector may cause systematic risks that disrupt the operation of all credit institutions and the whole economy 4 This is because : (i) With the role of credit intermediaries and capital regulating stations in the economy, on the one hand, credit institutions use all of their resources

to mobilize idle capital of organizations and individuals in the economy; on the other hand, credit institutions use the mobilized capital to provide credit to entities who need capital in the economy It’s this intermediary role that makes the credit institution liable to affecting depositors who lend

to credit institutions in the cases of credit risks that lead to insolvency This would leave a negative impact on monetary markets and the economy; (ii) Domestic and foreign credit institutions have a close interrelationship which derives from: the relationship of receiving deposits when these credit institutions deposit money into other credit institutions to enjoy the interest rate difference; relationship

of credit granting when credit institutions borrow from one another in the interbank market, or when syndicated credit institutions provide credits as in projects of syndicated loans, syndicated bank endorsement, syndicated financial leasing; payment relationship when credit institutions are banks serving organizations and individuals in the society in their partnerships (such as in encashment order, payment orders, letters of credit…); cross-ownership status in the banking sector when the owner of this credit institution is also a shareholder of other credit institutions Therefore, in the event that a credit institution is exposed to a sufficiently high risk leading to the loss of its liquidity, risk will also

be posed to the remaining credit institutions in the system like the “domino” effect

The fact about the world financial crisis in 2009 is the most obvious evidence of the systematic risks in the banking sector Because the crisis started in the US between 2008 and 2009, it was caused

by the US housing credit crisis (due to the expansion of subprime lending and the collapse of the real

1 According to Clause 2, Article 14 of the 2013 Constitution, “Human rights and citizens’ rights may not be limited unless prescribed by a law solely in case of necessity for reasons of national defense, national security, social order and safety, social morality and community well-being” and Clause 4 Article 15 of the 2013 Constitution, “The exercise of human rights and citizens’ rights may not infringe upon national interests and others’ lawful rights and interests”.

2 According to Clause 7, Article 3 of Circular No 08/2017/TT-NHNN on banking supervision order and procedures:

“The risk is the possibility of loss which reduces the equity capital, the income leads to a reduction in the capital adequacy ratio or limitation on the ability of credit institutions, foreign bank branches to achieve business objectives”

3 See also Clause 2, Article 8 of Circular No 08/2017/TT-NHNN, amended and supplemented by Circular No 04/2018/ TT-NHNN on banking supervision order and procedures.

4 See also Clause 8, Article 3 of Circular No 08/2017/TT-NHNN on banking supervision order and procedures.

estate bubble, the securitization of mortgage loans) The consequences of the crisis are: The collapse

of many financial institutions, corporations in the US and around the world (USA (70), Europe (5), Asia (4), Canada (3), Mexico (2), and Russia (1)); this financial crisis also dragged the whole world economy into recession1

In short, the limitation of freedom of enterprise in the banking sector is to ensure the freedom of doing business of other entities; and importantly, it is because the high risks inherent in the banking sector, which may cause systematic risks when not controlled, and may affect national interests, even national economic security and affect the legal rights and interests of other entities For the reasons mentioned above, in the banking sector, credit institutions have the right to freedom of enterprise, but that is the freedom under the limit

2.2 The content of the right of freedom of enterprise in the banking sector as provided by the law of Vietnam

The law of Vietnam has restricted freedom of enterprise in the banking sector through the following provisions:

- Limiting the freedom to engage in business in the banking sector

Limitation of the freedom to engage in business in the banking sector is expressed in the following groups of regulations:

The first group comprises regulations on legal capital According to these regulations, in order

to be able to do business in the banking sector, organizations and individuals must maintain the real value of the charter capital or the allocated capital at a number at least equal to the legal capital level Depending on the types of credit institutions, credit institutions must maintain different levels of legal capital as stipulated in Decree No.141/2006/NĐ-CP amended and supplemented by Decree No 10/2011/NĐ-CP on promulgating the List of legal capital levels of credit institutions Accordingly, the legal capital of banks is VND 3,000 billion; of foreign bank branches is USD 15 million; of a policy bank is VND 5000 billion, and of a finance company is VND 500 billion … 2 It can be seen that this is a relatively high capital level compared to other businesses This is a necessary requirement because credit institutions are the entities of currency trading, so a certain amount of money is required to maintain and develop currency business; at the same time, as mentioned above, since the banking sector involves many high risks, credit institutions need sufficient capital to deal with rising risks, contributing to ensuring the safety of the whole system and currency market and economy If

a credit institution cannot maintain its legal capital level, its liquidity and business operation will

be affected If the loss of a business credit institution leads to negative capital, the institution may

go bankrupt, causing severe consequences for the credit institutions system and the economy, such

as in the case of Financial Company II (ALC II) ALC II, which is 100% owned by Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Agribank) Due to the loss of ALCII’s business, negative capital and overdue debts for many customers, on March 29, 2016, the State Bank of Vietnam issued Decision No 457/ QD-NHNN on the failure to apply the solvency restoration measure to ALCII and

1 Assoc.Prof.Dr Nguyen Dang Don, Banking Currency, 2009, Publisher of National University, Ho Chi Minh City, p

327, 328, 329.

2 See also the List of legal capital of credit institutions, Decree No 141/2006/NĐ-CP amended and supplemented by Decree No 10/2011/NĐ-CP on promulgating the List of legal capital levels of credit institutions.

require this business to implement bankruptcy procedures as prescribed by law The bankruptcy of ALCII created false rumours, that is, Agribank (the owner of ALCII’s capital) also went bankrupt Therefore, in some localities, especially in industrial zones, it happened that workers quit their jobs

to withdraw money from banks Such incidents might be further provoked by the malevolent, causing anxiety among Agribank customers in particular and the society in general 2

The second group consists of regulations on operating licenses In order to participate in the banking business, while other businesses such as stationery business, clothing business, individuals and organizations only need to go to the business registration office and follow the registration procedure, credit institutions must be licensed by the State Bank of Vietnam The State Bank of Vietnam only grants licenses when entities desiring to do banking business meet the following requirements: The owner of a credit institution is a one-member limited liability company; Founding shareholders, founding members are legal entities operating legally and having the financial capacity

to contribute capital; Founding shareholders or founding members are individuals with full civil act capacity and financial capability to contribute capital; Having at least 2 founding shareholders who are organizations3 The purpose of these requirements is to ensure the safety in the operation of credit institutions, business organizations in a high-risk sector - the banking sector

- Limiting the right to autonomously solve internal problems in the business process

Limitation of the right to independently solve internal problems in the business process of a credit institution is expressed in the following two groups of basic regulations:

The first group consists of the regulations that require the permission of the State Bank of Vietnam

during the course of doing business Credit institutions who wish to make changes in name, location

of the head office, content, scope and duration of operation, transfer of the capital contribution portion

of the capital-contributing members; transfer of shares of major shareholders, transfer of shares leading to major shareholders becoming common shareholders and vice versa; a temporary shutdown

of business operations for more than 01 working day, except for cases of temporary shutdown of operation due to forced majeure reasons; listing of shares on domestic and foreign stock markets requires the permission of the State Bank of Vietnam4 This is a relatively typical requirement of the banking sector compared to other sectors, because in other areas, a company requiring changes in, such

as headquarter location, capital, business content only has to notify the business registration office This requirement has reduced the freedom of self-solving internal problems of credit institutions, but this is necessary for a high-risk sector - the banking sector

The second group consists of regulations on the mandatory requirements that must be complied

in the operation process, such as:

1 Khánh Linh, http://antt.vn/sau-khi-alcii-pha-san-viet-nam-con-bao-nhieu-cong-ty-cho-thue-tai-chinh-258944.htm, 05/11/2018.

2 Tuấn Nguyễn, http://thoibaotaichinhvietnam.vn/pages/thong-tin-doanh-nghiep/2018-11-11/agribank-thong-tin-chinh-thuc-ve-vu-alcii-64162.aspx , 11/11/2018.

3 See also Article 20 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions; Article 9 of Circular No 40/2011/TT-NHNN prescribing the licensing, organization and operation of commercial banks, foreign bank branches, representative offices of foreign credit institutions, other foreign institutions having banking activities in Vietnam.

4 Clause 1, Article 29 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

(i) Restrictions to ensure safety in the operation of credit institutions such as provisions on cases

of ineligibility for credit extension1, credit restrictions2; credit extension limits3; limits on capital contribution and share purchase,4 … These are huge limits set for the freedom of enterprise in the banking sector, contributing significantly to the prevention and reduction of NPLs (Non-performing loans) - the biggest risk for credit institutions, credit operations, operational risks, strategic risks… of credit institutions;

(ii) Provisions on protecting the interests of clients5 Accordingly, the law limits the right to freedom of enterprise of credit institutions to protect the interests of clients with such restrictions as: Preserve and insure deposits at relevant institutions by law, publicize their deposit preservation and insurance in their head offices and branches; Publicize deposit interest rates, service charges and rights and obligations of clients for each product and service provided; Publicize official transaction time and may not halt transactions during this time When halting transactions during the official transaction time, a credit institution or foreign bank branch shall post up notices of such halt at transaction places at least 24 hours before the halt…;

(iii) Provisions on responsibilities for preventing and combating money laundering and terrorism financing 6 In order to ensure public security, credit institutions are responsible for preventing and combating money laundering and terrorism financing, so the freedom of business of credit institutions should be limited to, the following examples: Neither covering nor conducting business activities related to amounts of proving illegal origin; Elaborating internal regulations on prevention and control of money laundering and terrorism financing; Taking measures to prevent and control money laundering and terrorism financing; Cooperating with competent stale agencies in investigating money laundering and terrorism financing activities These state regulations restrict the freedom of doing business of credit institutions, but they are necessary to ensure the safety of credit institutions and the freedom of other entities in society, the stability and sustainability of money markets, the economy and national security Money laundering or terrorism financing is now mostly carried out through banks; therefore, enforcing legal means to limit it is also an effective way to detect and prevent criminal acts For example, according to Mr Pham Gia Bao, Deputy Director of Anti-Money Laundering Department - State Bank of Vietnam, in money laundering activities, the activities carried through bank take up nearly 90% of the total number of suspicious transaction reports (STR) sent to the Anti-Money Laundering Department Although not all illicit proceeds are included in the money laundering cycle, the figure shows that criminals choose banks to legalize illicit revenues Criminals often use bank accounts with false names to receive and transfer money from illegal sources7 Therefore, when credit institutions cooperate with authorities to comply with the legal rights limits, they contribute greatly to minimizing money laundering crime

1 See also Article 126 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

2 See also Article 127 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

3 See also Article 128 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

4 See also Article 139 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

5 Article 10 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions.

6 Article 11 of the Law on Credit Institutions.

7 Nam Khánh, https://www.tienphong.vn/kinh-te/tien-ban-di-qua-ngan-hang-rua-vao-dau-1418234.tpo , 21/05/2019.

- Limiting the freedom of contract in the banking business process

Freed and voluntary commitment of agreement are the legal principles imposed upon organizations and individuals entering into and performing contracts in the society However, in order to mitigate risks, in the banking sector, the laws laid down regulations that must be followed during the process

of contract signing These include regulations such as conditions of form of contract, the requirement that all contracts signed between credit institutions and clients or partners must be in writing, in which contracts signed with clients are usually in the form of template contracts, such as a loan agreement that must be in writing1; regulations on prohibition of entering into a contract such as loan conditions, demand for capital to use for unsatisfactory purpose2…; countervailing sanctions in the contract, whereby if one of the involved parties violates the contract, the contract will be terminated 3,… this limits the rights of participating in a contract of the entities

If banks do not abide legal means in above limitations in performing contracts, there will be huge consequences for themselves and the economy For example, the violation of loan conditions in the case of Ha Van Tham - former chairman of the board of directors of Ocean Commercial Joint Stock Bank - OceanBank Specifically, in the middle of December 2012, Ha Van Tham and Nguyen Van Hoan (former Deputy General Director of OceanBank), allowed Trung Dung Trading and Services One Member Company Limited (by Pham Cong Danh - former Chairman of the Board of Directors of Vietnam Construction Joint Stock Commercial Bank - VNCB, Chairman of the Board of Members of Thien Thanh Group) to borrow VND 500 billion However, assets used as loan security are only nearly VND 70.8 billion in 2012 and more than VND 156 billion at present Violation of loan conditions due

to the borrower’s unsecured financial capacity (the value of collateral assets are many times lower than the loan), i.e the violation of the limit of contractual freedom by Ha Van Tham has caused a damage of nearly 350 billion VND to OceanBank4

- Limiting the freedom of competition in the banking sector

Vietnamese law guarantees the freedom of competition in the banking sector for entities to promote the money market and economic development, but this freedom is within limits The limitation of freedom of competition is anti-competitive practices or unfair competition practices5 Specifically, anti-competitive practices mean enterprises’ practices that cause or may cause anticompetitive effects, including anti-competitive agreement, abuse of a dominant position on the market and abuse

of monopoly power; unfair competition practices mean competition acts performed by enterprises against the principles of good faith, honesty, business norms, and standards, which cause or may cause damage to the legitimate rights and interests of other enterprises6 For the competition restriction

1 Clause 1, Article 23 of Circular No 39/2016/TT – NHNN prescribing lending activities of credit institutions and foreign bank branches to clients.

2 See also Article 8, Article 9 of Circular No 39/2016/TT – NHNN prescribing lending activities of credit institutions and foreign bank branches to clients.

3 See also Clause 1, Article 16 of Circular No 02/2017/TT-NHNN prescribing payment activities of credit institutions and foreign bank branches.

4 N Quyết, https://nld.com.vn/phap-luat/ha-van-tham-cho-pham-cong-danh-vay-bang-niem-tin-500-ti-dong- 20170301092025086 htm , 01/03/2017.

5 According to Clause 2, Article 9 of the 2010 Law on Credit Institutions, amended and supplemented in 2017, the law prohibits acts of restricting competition or acts of unfair competition.

6 Clause 2, Clause 6, Article 3 of the 2018 Law on Competition.