1. Trang chủ
  2. » Cao đẳng - Đại học

Changing for the better - Challenges and Opportunities

11 11 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 11
Dung lượng 3,59 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

1. Those w ho preach the usefulness of the communicaHve approach or leam or centercdness are not alw ays aw are thal w hat they have been doing is a far cry from w[r]

Trang 1

VNU Journal of Science, Foreign [.anguages 23 (2007) 65'75

Changing for the better: Challenges and Opportunities

Nguyen Hoa*, Tran Hoai Phuong

College o f Foreign LattịỊĩiQges, Vietnam National Umversity, Hatwi,

144 Xuan Thuy, Cau d a y , Hanoi, Vietnam

R e c e iv e d 1 J u n e 2007

A b s tr a c t T h is p a p e r p r o v i d e s a n a c c o u n t 0Í ^ p r o j e c t u n d e r t a k e n a t U n iv e r s ity o f L a n g u a g e s a n d

In tc rn d tio n d l S tu d ie s , V ie tn a m N a tio n a l U n iv e r s ity (U L ỈS V N U ) t o i n s t i t u t e a n E n g lis h ias(* track

p r o g r a m fo r s t u d e n t s m ajoring in tc d c h in g English f o r e ig n la n g u a g e (T E F L ) s in c c 2001 S p e c ific a lly

It gives insights in to th e change w c initialed a n d h o w w e have mandgcd it oncc w e started in order

n o t (o b e o v e r w h e lm e d b y th e p r o c e s s s e t in m o tio n T h is p r o g r a m c a n bii d e s c r ib e d a s a s e a c h a n g c

in th e lo c a l c o n tc x t w h ic h h a s h e lp e d generate creaHvc ideas f o r c o u r s e o r g a n iz a tio n , le a r n in g

activities and assessment methods With great efforts by all stakeholders, the program has gained

e n c o u r a g in g s u c c e s s , i m p r o v in g Ih e te a c h in g a n d le a r n in g a n d r e n d e r in g a b e t t e r q u a lity o f

U n iv e r s ity o f L a n g u a g e s a n d I n te r n a tio n a l S tu d ie s {ULIS) g r a d u a te s

This p a p e r p ro v id es an account of a

project u n d ertak en at U niversity of Languages

and International Studies, V ietnam N ational

U niversity (ULISVNU) Ỉ0 institute an English

fasl-track p ro g ram for stu d en ts m ajoring in

TEFL since 2001 In particular, it gives an insight

into the change we initiatcxi and how we have

it oncv wc Mailed ữo ú\i%\ wc would Iiol

be overvvheừned by the process set in motion

This program can be described as a sea change in

ihe Icxral contcxt W hen wc started the process ứ\e

whole team involved w as fully aw are thal this

change w as a tender and vulnerable affair prone

to deraiừnent, dim inution and abandonm ent in

the given context

1 R atio n ale for th e change

English language teaching (ELT) has had

quite a long history sp an n in g a period of m ore

than half a century in Vietnam M any m ethods

w ere tried w ith varying degrees of success, The

• C o r r e s p o n d in g a u th o r Tel.: 84-4'8582630.

old m ethods d ie hard Believe it or n o t the gram m ar translation is stìll there Those w ho preach the usefulness of the communicaHve approach or leam or centercdness are not alw ays aw are thal w hat they have been doing

is a far cry from w hat they preach A s Vietnam

is opening its d o o rs a n d m arket forces are m, cliuiigc bc«.oinc> ÌiiCM.ap4ỉblc G iubaludtiun tiiid

m form atization are olh er factors ứìat p u sh the ELT business forw ard Tho country needs a new crop of qi*ality tcachers of English, interpreters/translators, and the need for a good com m and 0 Í English is felt across the land.

in resp o n se to these d em an d s, ULISVNU

w ith th e b lessin g of V ietnam N ational

U niversity p u l to g eth er a project to launch a fast track p ro g ram The tw o au th o rs a n d a

n u m b e r of d ed icated teachers w ere in p ut charge T he idea w as to first pilot i t and then

sp read it to th e m ainstream system S tu d en ts

w ere selected o n th eir o w n m erit: they sh o u ld

d em o n strate a w illingness to join the project

by w riring a letter of application, and generally th ey w ere the m ost m otivated and

65

Trang 2

66 N g ỉỉĩ/ e n ỉì o a , T r a n H o a i Phuon^ ị ỉ V h l U l o u n i a ỉ o f S â e ì ĩ a \ F o r e ig n L a n g u a g e s 2 3 (2 0 0 7 ) 6 5 -7 5

talented ones from ỉhe s tu d e n t body Class

size w as 20 stu d en ts Screening involved

studying their acadcm ic records and

subjecting them to a selection test Teachers

w ere also carefully selected All the team

m em bers w ere trained in an English sp>eaking

country and h av e a M aster's degree All of

them should h av e prior experience w ork in g in

a w estern style environm ent W e cam e to the

task w ith hum ility a n d resolve, kno w in g that

m any previous a tte m p ts failed; for exam ple,

the large scale effort a t ch anging teacher's

teaching m ethods in the 1990s w as n ot fruitful

due to in adequate conceptualization and

su p p o rt as well as insufficieni follow -up work,

resources and appropriate policies They sim ply

introduced a m odel from outside and flew

professionals with high credentials m and out

without taking the local context m to account

2 T he b lu e p rin t a n d p la n n in g stage

The final go-ahead w as given and w e

started the conceptualization a n d planning

process Jack Lindquist [1Ị m entions four

changc strategies, w hich are rational planmng,

social interaction, h um an problem-solving and

poliHf'al ;^pproiirh W h^t ì.inHrỊiiÌQt is

very insightful and interesting In every

organization, there will b e a few innovators,

eager to change and reinvent thcmselveS; and

usually uncom fortabie w ith the sstatus quo A

second g ro u p of a b o u t 12 to 15 p ercent of the

organization is called the early adopters, open

to new ideas and changcs, th o u g h not as eager

as the innovators Follow ing is the early

majority, m aking u p a th ird of the population

T h ese a rc th e c a u tio u s fo llo w e rs o f th e

ea rly a d o p te rs T h e n c o m e s a n o th e r th ird ,

th e S0‘C alled s k e p tic a l la te m a jo rity , w h ic h

w a n ts fairly im p re s s iv e e v id e n c e th a t th e

c h a n g e is w o rk in g , p o s sib le , a n d r e w a rd e d

b efo re th e y v e n tu r e a try F in ally , a b o u t 15

p e rc e n t o f m o st o r g a n iz a tio n s a re the

laggards^ w h o w ill p ro b a b ly re sis t c h a n g e

u n til e v e ry o n e is d o in g th e n e x t n ew

th in g s L in d q u is t's o b s e rv a tio n s a re q u ite tru e in o u r co n tex t

Given o u r culture m uch influenced by Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, we decided on the social interaction approach We

im plem ented and m anaged the change as a soda] interaction w here ideas sh o u ld be com m unicated to people, and contacts, cx^nsultations, a n d persuasions w ere effecti\'e in biingm g people round to our view A num ber of

w orkshops w ere held am ong the team m em bers

w here w e discussed the followừìg issues:

(a) W h at is o u r philo so p h y reg ard in g the org an izin g of a fast track course?

(b) W hat standards should we aim for in terms

of knowledge, skills, and qualities/characters? (c) W h at sh o u ld be o u r ap p ro ach to delivering the goods?

(d) H ow sh o u ld w e m o n ito r o u r progress and incorporate feedback into the project as appropriate?

(e) W hat sorts of likely constraints are úìere?

D efining an u n d e rly in g philo so p h y w as a

b reak from trad itio n since in this country

training pro g ram s are often defined in term s

of aim s and objectives, W e believed th at a

p hilosophy clearly defined w o u ld h elp answ er question (b), i.e w h at stan d a rd s w e sh o u ld go

for in term s of know ledge, skills and

qualities/charactcrs A philo so p h y w ould serve as a fram ew o rk to set educational sta n d a rd s a n d assessm ent criteria, and to outline w h at th e m ost im p o rtan t goats w ere to achieve, and w h at resources w ere req u ired for the achievem ent of those educational aims As

F u h rm an n [2] excellently su m m arizes the

m ajor ed u catìo n al philosophies as w e w ere

a b o u t to e n te r the n ew m illennium This early decision w as extrem ely useful in help in g us

d e sig n th e k in d o f p ro g ra m w e w a n te d AlsO;

the choice of teaching course books, and

p rep aratio n of m aterials is m u ch facilitated Basically, w e ag reed th a t o u r philosophy und ersco red th e follow ing things

Trang 3

N ị iu y c ì ỉ H o a , T r a n H o o i P h u o ìig / V N U jo u r n a l o f S c ie n c e , F o r e ig n L a n g u a g e s 23 (2 0 0 7 ) 6 5 -7 5 67

C areer p rep aratio n is an expected

outcom e of a college education,

• College should develop stu d en ts' problem

solving and decision m ak in g evaluating, and

interactional or interpersonal skills,

• Students m ust learn how to m anage change,

• S tu d en ts can loam in a variety of ways;

all m u st be u n d ersto o d and fostered,

• S tu d en ts m u st able to use n a n d oth er

technologies,

• S tu d en ts sh o u ld leam to interact in a

variety of cultural en vironm ents, and

• E ducation is a lifelong proccss

2 1 t h e s ta tid a r d ii

T hus the sta n d a rd s w e set for o u r pilot

project w ere very high- S tu d en ts m u st reach

the level four of the ALTE's or C am bridge'

CAE after a b o u l 900 h o u rs of English leaching

and learning (All the stu d en ts had 300 hours

of English a t their high schools) O u r answ er

to quesh o n (b) w as d ciin ed in term s of

know ledge of English a n d c u ltu re required by

the rcprcsentationiil, interp retiv e and

interpersonal skills For exam ple, shadents

d Ik u u K i d e v e l o p l l i c iỉb iH ty t u i n l c i a c L b u l h

propositionally and interpcrsonally They

sh o u ld h av e acquired the ability to m ake

assessm ent, o r evaluations, to w o rk in a team

and to be able to deal w ith bolh academ ic and

em otional issues D iscussions w ere m ad e to

clarify vvhaỉ is m ean t by acquiring know ledge,

for exam ple W e follow ed Bloom 's taxonom y

[3] of educational goals A ccording to him,

educational goals can b e d efin ed in term s of

cognilive, m otor skills and affective goals O n

the cognitive scale, there are 6 levels:

know ledge, com prehension, application,

analysis, synthesis, and evaluation A t the top

' ' ' T h e C a m b r id g e s y s te m h a s fiv e b a n d s : KEY, PET,

FCE, C A E , a n d P ro ficicn cy , c o r r e s p o n d in g to th e

ALTERS W a y s ta g c , T h re s h o ld I n d e p e n d e n t

C o m p e te n t a n d G o o d

end, stu d en ts sh o u ld b e able to look a t issues critically, and m ake w ell-inform ed evaluation and assessm ent Skills d evelopm ent and the interpersonal skills w ere given special attention rig h t at the start to m ake su re the stu d en ts w o u ld g ro w a n d dev elo p into ỉhe

ty p e w e set out O n this basis, leam er-cenlercd activities w ere d esig n ed to h elp stu d en ts acquire know ledge a n d d ev elo p their skills, ừì

setting these goals, w e lo o k into account a

n u m b er of factors such as the m arket's

d e m a n d s for o u r products, the go v em m en l's overall d ev elo p m en t goals, as w ell the availability of resources, both financial and otherw ise W ith o u t these inputs, it w o u ld be

im possible to realize o u r program

2.2 O ur chosen approach

It is com m on know ledge th at no m atter

h o w clear o u r aim s and objectives are, the key

to success is d e p e n d e n t to a large degree on

o u r ap proach to delivering the goods After a

n u m b e r of m eetings, w e discussed how to deal w ith th e problem , a n d w e all agreed that the best w ay forw ard w as to translate the concept of learn er's au to n o m y and leam er- centeredness in to action, ih e w orld w e are living and w ork in g in now is very different from w h at w e w ere fam iliar with K now ledge

is exploding and becom ing m ore specialized and highly technical K now ledge also has a

sh o rt shelf life, too Thus any approach based

on giving know ledge is dcx>mcd to failure Students need to be equippx?d with competencies, skills and suitable qualities so that

they can survive and thrive 'ưx an ever-changing

environm ent It's leam er< en tered n ess, stupid! This is w hat w e often said to each other The stu d e n ts involved in o u r project h av e tu rned

o u t to be g reat resources- We gave them the

o p p o rtu n ities to show w h at they w ere worth/

a n d m ost of them^> proved extrem ely

O n e o f th e m d r o p p e d o u t fo r failin g t o rise to th e

c h a lle n g e o f th e p ro ject.

Trang 4

68 N ^ u y e ĩ ĩ H o a , T r a n H o o i P h u o ìt g / V h ỉ U lo i ír ĩì a l o f S c ie t ĩc ĩ , P o reÌỊỊtt L ữ H g u n ỊỊc s 2 3 ( 2 0 0 7 ) 65-75

com petent to design learning m aterials, and

capable of m aking co n trib u tio n to Ihe success

of the p ro ject T hus w e successfully laid o u t a

good foundation for a cooperatìve,

collaborative, peer-intcractive learning and

tutoring, This is our first lesson: keep going once

ựou believe ĩuhat you are cioitĩiỊ is right, and develop

ữpprơprừite and stiitable metiwds of delivery,

2,3 D c f i y x i n g g o o d e f f i X i i v e l e a r n e r s

A nother issue w e looked a t w as defin in g a

good, in d ep en d en t loam er K now ing their

characteristics w o u ld h elp u s a g reat d eal in

designing suitable pro g ram s w ith a p p ro p riate

activities for them W c concur w ith H edge

(2000: 76), w h o characterizes a good,

com petenl learner as one w h o is

(a) aw are of ỉheir stu d y needs and can

w ork w ith teachers to achieve th eir goals

(b) able to stu d y both w ithin a n d w ith o u t

the classroom

(c) able to fu rth er d ev elo p w h at they have

learned in class

(d) proactive in th eir learning

(e) capable of a d a p tin g ihcir learning

strategies (0 suit their needs and m ake

learning m ore effective

(f) able to maritigo their tim e, and

(g) not d ep e n d e n t on teacher's inputs

This served us well sincc this w as the

change w e w anted to m ake in stu d en ts To

start w ith this w as no easy task

3 A nticipating im plem entation problem stage

3.1 Some genera! and stm ctural constraints

A nticipating im plem entation problem s

and constraints w as im p o rta n t too, We

encounỉered som e faculty resistance and

unfavorable feelings in th e beginning

Structurally, m oving teachers aro u n d w as

unthinkable in a culture w h ere stability is

generally desirable But w e knew then that

this w as som ething u n av o id ab le in any

organization as Jack L in dquist suggests w e

sh o u ld b e p rep ared for W orking in such a

context, teachers sh o u ld be encouraged and

su p p o rte d trniely^ getting alt the resources they n eed ed Very critical in this connection

w as the fact lhat w e all enjoyed the strong backing of ỉhe top lead ersh ip o f o u r College

a n d the V ietnam N alional U niversity with

w hich o u r C ollege is affiliated a n d they still

continue to d o so The backing o f the top

leadership was instnwtental in keepitiịỉ the project

on track This is o u r next lesson.

3.2 Setting the record straight

There has been a lot of m isunderstanding about learner's autonom y and learner- centeredness; as a result, they w ere d isaed ited

in some circles of professionals Some staffs were skeptical of w hether o u r plan w ould work They

m ade unflattering cx)mments such as: 'T h is is nothing novel W e tried it before, and it didn't

w ork” Some w ere even w aiting for a tim e when they could utter "I told you so"' This was

discouraging for som o people, b ut w e d id not

give up We w ere resolved to get people to understand ửie concept and the realit)' by striving to do a good job

W e m anaged U) create m o re toUowers by startin g sm all, k eep in g a low profile, and

d eterm in ed to m ak e o u r w o rk a succcss righi from th e start T h e succcss a n d stu d en ts'

w o rd s w o u ld sp eak for us, a n d this strategy

w as w orking M ore stu d e n ts w ere interested

in o u r fast track p ro je c t and w anted to join

W e could n ot accept all of them , so a t the

b eg inning of each n ew academ ic year, a qualifying test w as given to decide w ho

w o u ld be invilcd to participate in the

program This is o u r th ird lesson: be realistic

and keep a low profile when ]/ou are just startin<Ị to avoid unnecessíìrỵ publicity.

3.3 Staffing problem

This is o ne of the issues th at w e anticipated very early on w o u ld h appen Like

Trang 5

N g u y e n H o a , T r a t i H o a i p h u o n g i V N U jo u r n a l o f S c ie n c e , F o r e ig n L a n g u a g e s 23 (2 0 0 7 ) 65-75 69

u s a t the b eg in n in g of Ihe project, they were

given train in g in th e m e th o d s of d eliv erin g the

course, and w e m a d e su re th at they w ere in

step w ith us Som e left the project either to

stu d y overseas o r m ove on to oth er

assignm ents a s d ictated by the circum stances,

and others joined us There has never been a

m anpow er vacuum This is very im portant to

ensure consistency and quality

4 T h e im p iem en taH o n stage

W hatever d esig n w c m ig h t h av e b ro u g h t

to ỉhe p rogram a n d w h a te v er im portance we

m ig h t h av e attach ed to the concept stâge, we

w ere aw are th at th e im plem entation w as far

m ore im p o rtan t a n d th a t it w as th e key to the

success of the project S tu d en ts sh o u ld be able

to participate m w ell-designed, w ell-organized

ncHvities and learning experiences set for them,

facilitators thai w e alw ays talked a b o u t

Team w o rk w as encouraged and stu d en ts

found them selves w ork in g in an open and

relaxed b u t serio u s m anner E verybody's say

w as counted, as w e teachers listened to

2»iudciU2>* ieedbdck Iherciuri*, w e w ere able to

deal w ith th eir problem s very early on

Enforcing learning discipline in th e sense that

each stu d en t h a d to w o rk o n th eir o w n stu d y

program and m eet dead lin es look som e tim e m

the first year as students werv finding

ihemselves struggling to m ake a break from

Kigh school routines All of us w orked very hard

and patiently, and by the end of the first year at

college, things w ere fine-luning O u r students

were very quick studies Everyone w as satisfied

vviửì their progress This lesson is ive must ptit in

place an open, particrpafory process.

M onitoring progress a n d incorporating

feedback into o u r a g en d a w as also an

im p o rtan t aspect of this pilot project

C onsultations w ith s tu d e n ts a n d gettm g

w ritten feedback is n o w a w ay of life for us

S tu d en ts arc very im aginative a n d indeed, they contributed a great deal to o u r w ork As

o u r project m oved forw ard, m ore staffs w ere recruited to join th e program

D eveloping a n d p rep arin g resources has alw ays played an im p o rtan t p a rt of a program However^ w e d id n ot in ten d to be

th e only source In fact, w h at h a p p en e d was

th at w e chose a core set 0Í textbooks which

co u ld p ro v id e the stu d en ts w ith fundam entals

of the lan g u ag e system and necessary cultural back g ro u n d know ledge Then, both stu d en ts and w e w ere to m ake use of a variety of resources ÍTom th e Internet, newspap>ers and journals S tu d en ts w ere en co u rag ed to develop, to d o research, a n d to brin g m aterials

to class to sh are w ith th eir classm ates and to

ev alu ate their preparations They learned and

g rew fast S tudy m ateriaJs h av e n ev er been in

sh o rt supply N ow , w e will m ove on to discuss the typical class activities and extra­ curricular activities w e developed and co­ developed w ith o u r students

4-1- In teaching and learning speaking

Besides the application of speaking activities

tr a c ii H o n a lly u r ^ c i i n t h e E n g l i s h D c p a x l m o n l prior to the Fast-ừack program such as pair

w ork and g ro u p discussions and presentations,

w e m ade a special use OÍ various types of prescntâtìon, debate, forum and role play

a) Presentation

As p resentations arc frequent tasks for stu d en ts in all the four years a t college, we

m ad e them m eaningful and interestìng by setting different levels and stan d a rd s for each year For exam ple, stu d en ts w ere ta u g h t and expected to b e able to give inform ative

p resentations in the first year, persuasive

p resentations in the second y e a r and

m vestigative prescn íatío n s in ứie th ird year In

th e last level, stu d e n ts had to choose a

b u rn in g issue to investigate a n d th en present

th e results along w ith th eir analysis and com m ents T he aim of all these types is to

Trang 6

70 NịỊuyen Hoa, Tran Hoai PhuoTĩg / VNU Ịoumal of Science, Foreign Languages 23 (2007) 65-75

develop stu d en ts' know ledge, public speaking

skills, confidcnce and m ultip le abilities such as

m anaging presentations w ith in ỉim e lim it and

h an dling questions from the audiencc

b) Forum

The aim is to dev elo p stu d e n ts' general

know ledge about the topic a n d skills to speak,

argue, in terru p t politely in English, etc The

procedure, according to N g u y en e t ai [4], is as

follows First, stu d en ts select a topic from a

pool provided by th eir teacher or a topic of

their o w n interest o r level T hen they search

for m aterials to leam m o re background

know ledge a b o u t the topic Later, all the

stu d en ts share m aterials, each con trib u tin g a

m inim um of one article so th at each stu d e n t

has copies of ab out 20 articles to read to for

content as w ell as ỉhe English vocabulary

frequently used in the topic As ior the

grouping, stu d en ts are d iv id ed into su b ­

groups of from 3 to 4 stu d en ts Each g ro u p is

given a role in the forum For exam ple, w ith

the topic of Sex education at upper secondary

school in Vietnam, the roles will be: parents,

teachers, stu d en ts, psychologists and

sociologists (N guyen e l al) G ro u p s will

prepare for their assigned roles accordingly

D uring a forum , there will be a lead g ro u p

w hich will present briefly ab o u t the topic,

raise questions for discussion and facilitate Ihe

discussion After the forum , teachers and

g ro u p s give feedback o n the language

perform ance (accuracy and fluency), c o n te n t

g ro u p s' or in d ividuals' contributions, etc

based on an agreed set of criteria for a good

presentation, facilitation and contribution

c) Debate

The pro ced u re for a deb ate is qu ite sim ilar

to that for a forum T he difference is th at there

will be only tw o particip atin g g ro u p s of three

shidenls; and thal each g ro u p chooses either

to agree or disagree w ith ỉhe topic in

discussion They will need to collect

inform ation, build th eir arg u m en ts an d d u rin g

the debate p ro v id e in stan t attack on the

o pinion of th e opp o sin g team D ebate is con d u cted a t tw o levels: free style for Ihe second y ear stu d en ts and professional style for th ird y e a r stu d en ts W hile the free style is the o p en discussion betw een th e tw o g ro u p s

w ith o u t any specific tu m -ta k in g procedure, the professional d eb ate will give each m em ber

of a g ro u p only one chance to speak Thus he/she has to try to attack the oth er g ro u p 's view and arg u e for h is/h er g ro u p 's view effectively A fter th e debate, teachers and

g ro u p s m ay ask further q u estìo n s to clarify

u nclear p o in ts a n d give feedback on the language p erform ance (accuracy and fluency), content, g ro u p s' o r in d iv id u als' contributions, etc, based on an agreed set of criteria for a

d eb ate a n d vote for th e g ro u p they th in k is

m o re persuasive T h ro u g h this activity, stu d en ts could actively d ev elo p im p ro m p tu speaking skills, persuasive speaking, quick responses, analytical thin k in g a n d problem ­ solving skills

d) Role play Each sem ester, fast-track teachers design

role play activities to m atch w ith the

targeted obifTtivos in term s of know ledge and skills For exam ple, in

sem ester 6, K36 stu d e n ts w ere involved in 3n

em p lo y m en t project T he topic w as preparing

h u m an rcsou rcc for a soon-to-be-oponed

L anguage S u p p o rt U nit (LSU) for stu d en ts

w h o h av e difficuldes in learn in g in ULIS, VNU T he class w as d iv id e d in to a g ro u p of university officials (recruiters), m anagers of the LSU (interview ees, recruiters), senior stu d en ts w h o w a n t to w o rk as m anagers or tutors for th e LSU (interview ees) and journalists w h o cared for the event Recruiters

h a d to design a leaflet adv ertisin g for

m anagers, m anagers h ad to d esig n another leaflet ad v ertisin g for tu to rs, and senior stu d en ts n eed ed to w rite app licatio n letters to the university for the posts of m anagers or tutors and sit for a job interviiiw Selections

Trang 7

N ^ u y e tì H o a T r a n H o a i P h u o n g / V h ỉU lo u n ỉữ ì o f S c ie n c e , f o r e ig n L a n g u a g e s 2 3 (2 0 0 7 ) 65-75 71

w ould be d iscu ssed am ong recruiters and

an nounced lo applicants U niversity officials,

selected m anagers iind selected tutors w ere

then interview ed by journalists T he first

w ork in g session w as also d o n e right in front

of the class T h o u g h this w as only a sim ulated

au th en tic task, m o st stu d e n ts expressed that

they really en jo y ed it They explained that

d u rin g the plav, Ihey acted their roles

seriously, w an rin g to succeed a n d m aking

efforts to be accepted bv others, so they h ad

feelings that they w ere experiencing â real-life

situation

4.2 I n U w h i r i g ijMti VVrỉíin^V L i s t e t ĩ í ì i Ị Ị

íV U Ỉ R e / 7 d i ỉ i ị ỉ

a) Portfolios

Portfolio is collections of stu d en ts' w riting,

read in g passages o r listening m aterials d u rin g

a given period of tim e It is a typ e of journals

for stu d en ts to record their learning activities

both in and o u tsid e the classroom K eeping a

portfolio helps s tu d e n ts form a good habit of

listening, reading and w ritin g frequently and

have a gcx>d record of rheir stu d y progress

R equirem ents for portfolios vary from one

acnnolui Uỉ ỉh c ỉKCKị, dcpcni.lii)g oit ãluđculd'

level For instance, tcachcrs of read in g could

ask first year s tu d e n ts to collect reading

p ap ers according to certain them es to find the

new w ords, form n ew sentences w ith those

w o rd s and su m m a riz e Ihe content of the

papers For their second year students, they

w ould ask Ihem to collect read in g papers, list

Ihc new w o rd s a n d m ake sentences w ith those

w ords, sum m arize th e passages, p rovide a

critical review, a n d d esig n exorcises to practice

â certain read in g skill intro d u ced in the

sem ester Sim ilarly, in listening lessons,

teachers w o u ld req u ire stu d e n ts to keep

portfolios of w h a t they listened every week,

w h at problem s th ey had, and h o w they solved

their ow n problem s

U sing portfolios in teaching writingr

especially in g ro u p w riting, is also highly

effective In K35 sem ester 5 w riting class for exam ple, all th e g ro u p m em bers w ould sit together to discuss h o w to w rite â paper, and the first person w ro te th e first version O ther

g ro u p m em bers w o u ld th en take tu rn s to

w rite ỉhe second and the th ird versions Finally, th e e n tire g ro u p agreed on one final version to subm it All versions w ere then included in o rd e r in a portfolio W hen

m ark in g th e portfolio, leachers co u ld see both

th e process and th e final product They could therefore ev alu ate stu d e n ts' perform ance in each draft as w ell as in the final w riting An

a d a p ta tio n of this activity that w e used in sem ester 6 req u ired all g ro u p m em bers to

w rite the first version, and Ihen they sat together to either select the best version to

im p ro v e on o r chooso to com bine the strengths of all th e p ap ers inlo the second draft, and th en last draft This m ethod seem ed

to b e m ore effective in m aking sure all stu d en ts w ro te th eir original th o u g h ts dow n

A fter coliccting all entries for th e 15 w eeks

of a semester^ stu d e n ts w ere often required to

w rite a final rep o rt to describe their w o rk and evaluate th e progress as w ell as the lessons they learned This ty p e of reflection helped stu d en ts to be au to n o m o u s in their studying, rath er th an alw ays looking to teachers for com m ents

b) Teaching listening and w riting using the m ulti-m edia o r co m p u ter lab

In listening lessons, w ith the h elp of the

M ulti-m edia center, teachers could use the lab

to teach listening a n d w riting They can use

CD, VCD, vid eo files and online w eb pages, such as those of C N N or BBC to teach Teachers w ere even p ro v id ed w ith five-

m in u te original video files to use for their

m aterial d ev elo p m en t and daily teaching

D u rin g th e last tsu n am i in Asia^ teachers in ửie Fast-ưack prograiTi taught listening lessons live from http://w w w cnn.com to check on the toll

Trang 8

72 N g u y e n H o a T r a n H o a i P h u o n g ỉ v ^ u Ịo u r ĩìa l o f S c ừ n c e , F o r e ig n L ứ ĩĩỊỊU ứ ịỊe s 2 3 (2 0 0 7 ) 65-75

n um ber updates, and b o th teachers and

students w ere pleased w ith the real tim e

feature of th e learning facilities

In w riting lessons, stu d en ts could w o rk on

com puters, and teachers could use the m aster

com puter to observe how each of them w rote

u n d er tím e p ressu re to offer h elp w henever

necessary A fter an in d iv id u al w ritin g activity^

stu d en ts could all save their p ap ers on a

shared folder and view each o th er's papers

The w hole class could view any p a p e r to

com m ent and correct together O rg an izin g the

class like this m ade the w ritin g lessons m ore

interesting, m ore real time, m o re visual and

m ore effective

c) Research project and tu to rin g project for

fourth year stu d en ts

The aim of ứie research project and tutoring

project is to develop language skills, research

skills and m icroteaching skills (e.g.: questioning

skill, grt>up-work, presentation skills,

communication skills and facilitation skills)

In the research project; students conducted a

research projcct in groups of four^^ They went

ửưough all the steps of a research cycle from

choosing the topic identifying the research

question, writing Ihe liỉerature review, collecting

real lứe d a ti, anolv/ing dilta and w nting the

condusion and rocommendations Reportbacks

were held weekJy and support was offered

limely io ensure the a'scarch progress of all the

g ro u ^

R unning parallel, the tu to rin g project<^^

w as held w ith the particip atio n of io u rlh y ear

fast-track stu d en ts a n d tw o g ro u p s of second

year m ainstream stu d en ts for 12 weeks

D uring the 12 weeks, fast*track stu d en ts w ere

guided on how to co n d u ct tuto rin g activities,

The research componcni follows a m(xJcl of that in Ihe

T;tlkhasc program at Asmn Insuiulc Technology Center in

Vicinam

As Ihe project involved about 30 mainstream

students, teachcrs soughl the approval of the dean and

vicc-deans of the English Dcpartmcni and the head

the Language Skills fi before embarking on it.

from an aly zin g learn ers' needs to w orking out

th e syllabus, m ak in g lesson plans, facilitating lessons in front of th e class and self-evaluating their tuto rin g perform ance S tudents were

su p erv ised a n d assisted th ro u g h o u t the process After each tu to rin g session, feedback

w as p ro v id ed to s tu d e n ts so thal they couid

h elp m ain sỉream s tu d e n ts better in their follow ing session P articip an ts' feedback a t the

e n d of ihe sem ester revealed that this activit)' proved especially helpful to fast-track students

in practicing m tcgrated language skills and in learning how to teach a n d handle a class It was also beneficial to the m ainstream partid p an ts in receivmg uistm ctions a n d advice on areas they needed to ừnprove

The results of both the research and the tutoring project w ere exhibited in the O pen

H ouse aỉ the end of sem ester 7 w here K35^ K36 and K37 fast-track stu d en ts welcomed visitors to see their research and tuto rin g outputs

4.3 In conducting cxtra<utricular activities

Besides learn in g in class, fast-track stu d en ts also o rg an ize d som e extra-curricular activities such as p ro v id in g orientatíon for

n ew 2»ludeiil5 (dl ih c b u ^ iitiu n ^ OÍ ev ery new

a ca d e m ic y ear), tu to r in g m ainstream s tu d e n ts

(as K37A1 s tu d e n ts h elp ed K38 m ainstream classes in 2005) a n d p articip a tin g in p rep arin g Bulletìn/ N ew sletters T hese actìvities helped stu d en ts to im p ro v e th eir language and give them a chance to h e lp o th er stu d en ts in a co­ operative learning en v iro n m en t

5 R esults

To ev alu ate th e effectiveness of the change

w e initiated a n d to research th e stu d en ts' perception of all the elem en ts of the four-year training program , w e conducted a com prehensive p ro g ra m ev aluation in m id-

2005 to su rv ey all th e fast*track stu d en ts of K35, 36, 37 a n d 38A1 Som e m ajor ftndings

ab out the learn ers' needs, the course

Trang 9

N g u ỵ e n H o a , T r a n H o a i P h u o n g / V N U Ị o u m a l o f S c ie n c e , F o r e ig n L a n g u a g e s 2 3 (2 0 0 7 ) 6 5 -7 5 73

objectives, th e testin g a n d assessm ent

m ethods, ử\e learn in g m aterials a n d the

detailed aspects of th e teaching a n d learning

process can b e su m m a riz e d below

a) S tu d e n t's needs

R eg arding w h e th er the educational

program m et their needs, s tu d e n ts of all the

four courses had q u ite po sitiv e judgm ents

From 80 to 90 % of the s tu d e n ts in each course

found th e p ro g ram e ith e r g o o d o r very good

O nly ab o u t 10 to 20% fo u n d it average No

stu d e n t rep o rted th at th e p ro g ra m d id not

m eet ỉheir training needs

b) C o u rse objectives

W hen asked how w oll the course m et the

objectives, 8% found this veiy well, 50% well,

40% average, a n d only 2% said not very well

Thus, 98% of all th e s tu d e n ts found lhat the

course m et the ta rg ete d objectives^'^^ This

re s u lt according lo B row n's view of program

L'valuation [5], sh o w s th at th e fast-track

program has been a successful one H ow ever,

the 2%, th o u g h negligible, m eans th at teachers

w o u ld need to w ork h a rd e r to m ak e su re all

the objectives could be met

c ) T e s t i n g a n t i <33:>c3am cnt

W hen askod ab o u t Ihc fairness 0 Í different

evaluation m eth o d s ust'd in the course,

stu d en ts highly v alu ed th e continuous

.ìsscssm enỉ m eth o d s u se d in Ihe fast-track

program Som e of th em stated that

'Co?ifm«ow5 assessment methods help me see that

Ì am evaluated throu<ihout the course, not only at

the midiile or at the end o f tlie term when I take the

m id'fenn or final All th e students

ev aluated the testing a n d assessm en t m ethods

we applied very positively From 60 to over

90% of th e S tu d en ts in e a c h c o u rse fo u n d th em

eith er good o r verỵ good O n ly a ro u n d 5% of the

T h e c o u rs c o b je c tiv e s a s w e ll ÙS s e m e s te r a n d y e a r

o b je c tiv e s w e re p r e s e n te d to s t u d e n t s a t th e b e g in n in g

o f th e c o u rs e a n d r e m in d e d th r o u g h o u t th e fo u r y e a rs.

stu d en ts found th em not good K35A1 students^ w h o h a d gone th ro u g h the four

y ears of the p ro g ram a n d h a d a m osl com plete view of all th e m eth o d s used, ev aluated them

m o st favorably w ith no one finding them not

good D espite t h a t Ihe 5% of students

rep o rtm g dissatisfaction in K38A1 a n d K36A1

m eans that teachers w ould need to help students understand the assessment tools better and a t the sam e tim e adjust their m ethods to

m ake them fairer and m ore effective

Besides, ử\e su rv ey also show s that

stu d en ts found th e assessm ent m ethods very helpful in o rien tatin g and assisting them to leam T he m eth o d s w ere ev aluated m ost favorably a m o n g first year and fourth year

stu d en ts w ith 65% a n d 47% saying very good

respectively T he second year and third year stu d en ts (K36A1 and K37A1) ev aluated the

sup p o rtiv en css of assessm ent tools as good,

and only one th ird y ear stu d e n t in K36A1

considered it not ịỊooii This result was very

encouraging to the teaching learn as all these

m ethods took both stu d en ts and teachers a

g reat am o u n ỉ of Hme

d ) L v ^ r n i i ì ị ^ i n a l c i i a l : )

As m entioned in a previous section, the learning m aterials u sed in the fasN rack

p ro g ram included a core set of m aterials for students' self-study and a set of supplem entary materials designed a n d com piled by the teaching team to b e used in class Instructions and su p p o rt from teachers w ere provided

w h en ev er stu d e n ts h ad problem s with learning th e corc m aterials

The su rv ey results indicate alm ost no negative feedback for learning materials Generally, stu d en ts enjoyed w h at we used in

class O ne of th em said: '7 like the writing and

speaking materials Theỵ are very good" A nother

said: '‘The supplernentarỵ materials are even better

than the core ones" H ow ever, one second year

stu d e n t stated ''Some exercises are rather

Trang 10

74 N yuự e« H o a , T r a u H o a i P ĩm o ĩiịi / V N U Ị o u n ia l o f S c ie n c e , F o r e ig n L a n g u a g e s 2 3 (2 0 0 7 ) 6 5 -7 5

difficult", and one fourth y e a r stu d e n t said

"Wt* need more materials" These com m ents are

indeed quite sharp, b ringing to life a fact that

to a fasK rack class w ith specific

characterisHcs, specific objectives a n d specific

needs, the reliance on any one course book

will not satisfy all students It also reveals that

the flexible self*designed o r self-com piled

m aterials, though tim e-consum ing, are in fact

m ore suitable and therefore m o re useful The

com m ent th at som e p arts of th e m aterials

w ere difficult is u n d e rsta n d a b le because u p to

ihe point of the survey, materials^ especially

those for o u r first load of stu d en ts, h a d n ot

gone th ro u g h any p rior pilot,

e) Teaching âiìd learning

A part from the four above elem ents of a

training program , the effectiveness of teaching

and learning activities w as also surveyed

Students' feedback w as on the w hole

affirm ative w ith th e converted average scores

ranging from 60 to 95 o u t of 100 for each

learning actìvity T he activities for w riting

skills w ere ev alu ated m ost highly w ith scores

from 75 to 95 N ext com e activities for

bpedking ỉ»kilb will) (rum 70 to 90 ữoUi

actívities for listening a n d read in g received

scores ranging from 60 Ì 0 90 This resu lt show s

that o u r w riting and sp eak in g p ro g ram s were

very well-received by th e stu d en ts, a n d that

the listening and read in g w ere seen as íairỉy

good H ow ever, detailed statistics still show s

that opinions varied am ong m em bers of the

sam e class and am ong classes This is

reasonable because each stu d e n t has h is o r her

ow n perception of ap p ro ach to different

learning activities H ow ever, it is obvious th at

the teaching team n eed s to review all the

teaching activitìes, p ro m o tin g good ones and

im proving or rem oving w eak ones to satisfy

students better

In addition, w h en asked ab o u t how

satisfactory all learning activities w ere ừi

term s of th e level of effectiveness felt, level of

m otivation crcated and level of lc?arner autonom y d ev elo p ed , 95% of the stu d en ts stated th at the activities w ere effective, 80% found them m otivating, a n d 100% said they helped them be m ore au to n o m o u s in learning

So far in this section, w e hav e presented the m ost im p o rtan t results gained from o u r

p rogram ev aluation survey As can been seen,

the p ro g ram has received highly positive evaluation 0Í alm o st all the stu d en ts o n its five elem ents This m ark s its initial succcss in

n sm g u p to o u r expectation of a special training p ro g ra m th a t b ro u g h t a b o u t a truly leam er-centered learning en v iro n m e n t and

m ore im portantly an im proved education quality T he lELTS scores o f the 16 students^'^'

w h o took th e test a t the e n d of the four-year

p rogram in 2005 (5 stu d e n ts got 7.5, 9 g ot 7.0 and 2 g o t 6.5) h a v e p ro v ed that o u r goal 0Í yielding a g ro u p of stu d e n ts w ith an equivalence of level four of th e ALTERS or

C am b rid g e's CAE after a b o u t 900 h ours of English teaching an d learning has been met These days, it is enco u rag in g to see our K35 a n d K3(> grddualeb á y u u n ^ ^enerdUuiỉ

of ed u cato rs in the English d e p a rtm e n t and

o th e r d e p a rtm en ts of o u r university, sharing

th e w o rk w ith u s and receiving positive com m ents from th eir em ployers It is also

h eart-w arm in g to h e a r th at o u r stu d e n ts who received scholarships to various M aster program s in America, Singapore and Thailand shortly after the course are doing very well, loo

6 C o n clu sio n and lessons learned

The project has been acclaimed as a successful experim ent and our mother organizatioa Vietnam National University, has continued the project and m oved forward with

Oứter students did n d lake ihc lest because they went

on other training programs right after ỬỈC course.

Ngày đăng: 25/01/2021, 01:58

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w