In particular unique weak solutions to stochastic differential equations give rise to strong Markov processes whose one-dimensional distributions are governed by the corresponding second[r]
Trang 1Part II
Download free books at
Trang 2Jan A Van Casteren
Advanced stochastic processes
Part II
Trang 4Chapter 3 An introduction to stochastic processes: Brownian motion,
3 Some results on Markov processes, on Feller semigroups and on the
4 Martingales, submartingales, supermartingales and semimartingales 147
Chapter 3 An introduction to stochastic processes: Brownian motion,
3 Some results on Markov processes, on Feller semigroups and on the
4 Martingales, submartingales, supermartingales and semimartingales 147
To See Part 1 download: Advanced stochastic processes: Part 1
Click on the ad to read more
www.sylvania.com
We do not reinvent the wheel we reinvent light.
Fascinating lighting offers an infinite spectrum of possibilities: Innovative technologies and new markets provide both opportunities and challenges
An environment in which your expertise is in high demand Enjoy the supportive working atmosphere within our global group and benefit from international career paths Implement sustainable ideas in close cooperation with other specialists and contribute to influencing our future Come and join us in reinventing light every day.
Light is OSRAM
Trang 5Advanced stochastic processes: Part II
Chapter 3 An introduction to stochastic processes: Brownian motion,
3 Some results on Markov processes, on Feller semigroups and on the
4 Martingales, submartingales, supermartingales and semimartingales 147
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
Click on the ad to read more
360°
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
360°
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
360°
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
360°
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers
Trang 6Advanced stochastic processes: Part II
vi
Contents
Chapter 3 An introduction to stochastic processes: Brownian motion,
3 Some results on Markov processes, on Feller semigroups and on the
4 Martingales, submartingales, supermartingales and semimartingales 147
Click on the ad to read more
We will turn your CV into
an opportunity of a lifetime
Do you like cars? Would you like to be a part of a successful brand?
We will appreciate and reward both your enthusiasm and talent.
Send us your CV You will be surprised where it can take you.
Send us your CV on www.employerforlife.com
Trang 7CHAPTER 4
Stochastic differential equations
Some pertinent topics in the present chapter consist of a discussion on
mar-tingale theory, and a few relevant results on stochastic differential equations in
spaces of finite dimension In particular unique weak solutions to stochastic
dif-ferential equations give rise to strong Markov processes whose one-dimensional
distributions are governed by the corresponding second order parabolic type
differential equation Essentially speaking this chapter is part of Chapter 1 in
[146] (The author is thankful to WSPC for the permission to include this text
also in the present book.) In this chapter we discuss weak and strong solutions
to stochastic differential equations We also discuss a version of the Girsanov
transformation
1 Solutions to stochastic differential equations
Basically, the material in this section is taken from Ikeda and Watanabe [61]
In Subsection 1.1 we begin with a discussion on strong solutions to stochastic
differential equations, after that, in Subsection 1.2 we present a martingale
characterization of Brownian motion We also pay some attention to (local)
exponential martingales: see Subsection 1.3 In Subsection 1.4 the notion of
weak solutions is explained However, first we give a definition of Brownian
motion which starts at a random position
A d-dimensional Brownian motion is a almost everywhere continuous adapted
the following equality holds:
This process is called a d-dimensional Brownian motion with initial distribution
thefollowing equality holds:
Trang 81.1 Strong solutions to stochastic differential equations In this
sec-tion we discuss strong or pathwise solusec-tions to stochastic differential equasec-tions
We also show that if the stochastic differential equation in (4.108) possesses
unique pathwise solutions, then it has unique weak solutions We begin with a
formal definition
4.2 Definition The equation in (4.108) is said to have unique pathwise
Strong solutions are also called pathwise solutions In order to facilitate the
proof of Theorem 4.4 we insert the following lemma
4.3 Lemma Let γ be a positive real number Then the following inequality
Trang 9the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
A version of the following result can be found in many books on stochastic
differential equations: see e.g [61, 107, 113]
Click on the ad to read more
I was a
he s
Real work International opportunities
�ree work placements
al Internationa
or
�ree wo
I wanted real responsibili�
I joined MITAS because Maersk.com/Mitas
�e Graduate Programme for Engineers and Geoscientists
Month 16
I was a construction
supervisor in the North Sea advising and helping foremen solve problems
I was a
he s
Real work International opportunities
�ree work placements
al Internationa
or
�ree wo
I wanted real responsibili�
I joined MITAS because
I was a
he s
Real work International opportunities
�ree work placements
al Internationa
or
�ree wo
I wanted real responsibili�
I joined MITAS because
I was a
he s
Real work International opportunities
�ree work placements
al Internationa
or
�ree wo
I wanted real responsibili�
I joined MITAS because
www.discovermitas.com
Trang 10the property that
ă 8, and such that
This process is pathwise unique in the sense of Definition 4.2.
The techniques in the proof below are very similar to a method to prove the
indeed, and that T has
a unique fixed point X which is a pathwise solution to the equation in (4.9).
Trang 11such that for
j“1K j psq2`řd
i“1max1ďjďd K ij psq2
of stochastic integrals relative to Brownian motion, the following inequality:
żs
0
ˇˇˇˇ
0
ˇˇˇˇ
Trang 13stochas-tic differential equation in (4.9) By using a stopping time argument we may
P-almost surely So uniqueness follows
1.2 A martingale characterization of Brownian motion The
fol-lowing result we owe to L´evy
surely continuous martingale with the property that the quadratic covariation
processes t ÞÑ ⟨M i , M j ⟩ ptq satisfy
Trang 144.6 Remark There is even a nicer result which says the following Let X be
E rpX j1ptq ´ b j1t q pX j2ptq ´ b j2t qs “ tΣ j1,j2.
For the one-dimensional case the reader is referred to Breiman [29] For the
higher dimensional case, see, e.g., Lowther [89].
Click on the ad to read more
Trang 15suffices to establish the equality:
E“e ´i⟨ξ,Mptq´Mpsq⟩ ˇˇ Fs‰“ e´1|ξ|2pt´sq , t ą s ě 0. (4.27)
E“e ´i⟨ξ,Mptq´Mpsq⟩‰
2|ξ|2pt´sq Then, by standard approximation arguments,
Trang 16In order to complete the proof of Theorem 4.5 from equality (4.30) it follows
e ´i⟨ξ,Mpτq⟩ dM j pτq ´1
2|ξ|2żt
s
e ´i⟨ξ,Mpτq⟩ dτ. (4.31)Hence, from (4.31) it follows that
2|ξ|2
v ptq ` v1ptq
˙
e1pt´sq|ξ|2 “ e1pt´sq|ξ|2. (4.35)The equality in (4.35) implies:
Trang 17The equality in (4.37) is the same as the one in (4.27) By the above arguments
As a corollary to Theorem 4.5 we get the following result due to L´evy
tMptq : t ě 0u is a Brownian motion with initial distribution given by µpBq “
The following result contains a d-dimensional version of Corollary 4.7.
martingale with covariation process given by
⟨M j , M k ⟩ ptq “
żt
0
4.9 Remark Since
qua-dratic covariation process
motion This proves the first part of Theorem 4.8 Next we calculate
Trang 181`ş0t e ´Zpsq dN psq, t ě 0, where Zptq “ Nptq ` 1
are called exponential local martingales The following proposition serves as a
preparation for Proposition 4.12 It also has some interest of its own
“
, AP FT
Click on the ad to read more
STUDY AT A TOP RANKED INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL
Reach your full potential at the Stockholm School of Economics,
in one of the most innovative cities in the world The School
is ranked by the Financial Times as the number one business school in the Nordic and Baltic countries
Visit us at www.hhs.se
SwedStockholm
no.1
nine years
in a row
Trang 19‰
“ 1, for all 0 ď t ď T , and for all
lo-cal martingale In general, this process is a submartingale Consequently, if
E“e ´Zptq‰
martingale.
The first equality in (4.44) is a consequence of the fact that, if an event A
Proof of 4.10 (a) An application of Itˆo’s formula and employing the
e ´Zptq
Trang 20“ 1 for all 0 ď t ď T
it follows that the process in (a) is a genuine martingale: see Theorem 4.11
the equality in (4.48) we obtain
Being the sum of two stochastic integrals with respect to (local) martingales
the equality in (4.49) implies that the process in (b) is a local martingale
(c) By using a stopping time argument we may and do assume that the process
Y pt1q “ EQN
“
M pt2q ` ⟨N, M⟩ pt2qˇˇ Ft1‰.
Trang 21-measurable variables G we have
E“e ´ZpT q pM pt2q ` ⟨N, M⟩ pt2qq G‰“ E“e ´ZpT q Y pt1q G‰. (4.50)
implies:
From assertion (b) together with our stopping time argument we see that the
Click on the ad to read more
Trang 22A combination of Proposition 4.10 and L´evy’s characterization of Brownian
“ 1 holds Then the process
establish some of their properties In the context of stochastic calculus they
h k pxq “ p´1q k e1x2
ˆ
d dx
The Hermite polynomials satisfy the following recurrence relation:
and therefore
Trang 23and hence
By differentiating the equality in (4.57) and again using (4.56) we obtain the
following differential equation:
In the following proposition we collect some of their properties
Trang 24Please notice that in the equalities in (4.64) through (4.66) the order of
Click on the ad to read more
Trang 25Proof These equalities follow from Itˆo’s formula and the equalities in
the equalities in (4.61) are relevant This completes the proof of Proposition
deterministic The the following identities are true:
Trang 26The equalities in (4.70) and (4.71) show the equalities in (4.67) The proof of
E
«ˇˇˇˇ
żt
0
e M ps1 q´ 1⟨M,M⟩ps1 qdM ps1q
ˇˇˇˇ
follows by partial integration and induction with respect to ℓ The first equality
in (4.68) can be obtained by an argument which is very similar to the proof of
4.16 Corollary Let the hypotheses and notation be as in Proposition 4.14.
E”e τ M ptq´1
2τ2⟨M,M⟩ptqı
“ 1; compare with the inequality in (4.41) and with orem 4.11.
Proof Equality (4.73) in Corollary 4.16 follows from the equality in (4.59)
from these arguments The only topic that requires some is the one about
2τ2⟨M,M⟩ptq These assertions follow from the
Trang 27identities (4.67) and (4.68) in Proposition 4.15 This completes the proof of
The previous results, i.e Proposition 4.14 and Corollary 4.16 are applicable if
role in the martingale representation theorem: see Theorem 4.21
1.4 Weak solutions to stochastic differential equations In the
Click on the ad to read more
“The perfect start
of a successful, international career.”
Trang 28The following theorem shows the close relationship between weak solutions and
solutions to the martingale problem
filtration pFtqtě0 Let tXptq “ pX1ptq, , X d ptqq : t ě 0u be a d-dimensional
continuous adapted process Then the following assertions are equivalent:
(4.78) implies that the stochastic integral pω, ω1q ÞÑ ş0t σ ps, Xpsqq dBpsq pω, ω1q
need for this extension.
Examples of (Feller) semigroups can be manufactured by taking a continuous
An explicit example of such a function, which does not provide a Feller-Dynkin
to the martingale problem do not necessarily give rise to Feller-Dynkin
semi-groups These are semigroups which preserve not only the continuity, but also
the same property However, for Feller semigroups we only require that
the same properties Therefore, it is not needed to include a hypothesis like
Trang 29following equality holds:
Nadirashvili [99] constructs an elliptic operator in a bounded open domain
uniquely solvable More precisely the result reads as follows Consider an elliptic
corre-sponding to the operator L which can be defined as a solution to the
Rd˘ Nadirashvili is interested in non-uniqueness inthe above martingale problem and in non-uniqueness of solutions to the Dirich-
so-called good solutions u to the Dirichlet problem are investigated A good
The main result is the following theorem: There exists an elliptic operator L
two good solutions An immediate consequence is non-uniqueness of solutions
to the corresponding martingale problem
The following corollary easily follows from Theorem 4.17 It establishes a close
relationship between unique weak solutions to stochastic differential equations
and unique solutions to the martingale problem For the precise notion of
“unique weak solutions” see Definition 4.19 below This result should also be
compared with Proposition 3.43, where the connection with (strong) Markov
processes is explained
4.18 Corollary Let the notation and hypotheses be as in Theorem 4.17 Put
following assertions are equivalent:
żt
0
Trang 30has unique weak solutions.
4.19 Definition The equation in (4.80) is said to have unique weak solutions
(4.80) This is the case if and only if for any pair of Brownian motions
relative to P1
Click on the ad to read more
89,000 km
In the past four years we have drilled
That’s more than twice around the world.
careers.slb.com
What will you be?
1 Based on Fortune 500 ranking 2011 Copyright © 2015 Schlumberger All rights reserved.
Who are we?
We are the world’s largest oilfield services company 1 Working globally—often in remote and challenging locations—
we invent, design, engineer, and apply technology to help our customers find and produce oil and gas safely.
Who are we looking for?
Every year, we need thousands of graduates to begin dynamic careers in the following domains:
n Engineering, Research and Operations
n Geoscience and Petrotechnical
n Commercial and Business
Trang 31d, assertion (i) implies that the process
Trang 32is not invertible we proceed as follows First we choose a Brownian motion
space pΩ1, F t1,P1q The probability spaces pΩ, F t ,Pq and pΩ1, F1t ,P1q are coupled
r
Ω, rFt , rP¯, where rΩ “ Ω ˆ Ω1, rFt “ Ftb F1
its null space More precisely,
Trang 33▶ enroll by September 30th, 2014 and
▶ save up to 16% on the tuition!
▶ pay in 10 installments / 2 years
▶ Interactive Online education
▶ visit www.ligsuniversity.com to
find out more!
is currently enrolling in the
Interactive Online BBA, MBA, MSc,
DBA and PhD programs:
Note: LIGS University is not accredited by any
nationally recognized accrediting agency listed
by the US Secretary of Education
More info here
Trang 34the local martingale
Itˆo’s lemma we get
żt
0
Trang 35The final expression in (4.93) is a local martingale Hence (iii) implies (i).
Trang 362 A martingale representation theorem
In this section we formulate and prove the martingale theorem based on an
n-dimensional Brownian motion Proofs are, essentially speaking, taken from
Trang 37In the proof of Theorem 4.21 the following notation is employed The symbol
C08`
Rn ˆN˘
with the supremum norm
and for allpt1, , t N q P r0, T s N
ΩeřN j“1λ j ¨W pt jqg d P “ 0 Next, put Gpλq “şΩeřN j“1λ j ¨W pt jqg dP
Trang 38, and for all pt1, , t N q P p0, 8q N,
simplepr0, T s ; R n q if and only if the random variable g P L2pΩ, F T ,Pq is
The following theorem is known as the Itˆo representation theorem
Trang 39Theo-rem 4.22 has been established now The uniqueness part follows from the Itˆo
ˇˇˇˇ
2ff
“ 0,
Next we formulate and prove the martingale representation theorem
Stochastic Differential Equations or BSDEs for short.)
Trang 40are martingales, from (4.106) we infer
Click on the ad to read more
www.mastersopenday.nl
Visit us and find out why we are the best!
Master’s Open Day: 22 February 2014
Join the best at
the Maastricht University
School of Business and
Economics!
Top master’s programmes
• 33 rd place Financial Times worldwide ranking: MSc International Business
Sources: Keuzegids Master ranking 2013; Elsevier ‘Beste Studies’ ranking 2012; Financial Times Global Masters in Management ranking 2012
Maastricht University is the best specialist university in the Netherlands
(Elsevier)