The Hawthorne Studies advanced the idea of improving human relations in organizations. Accepted findings of Hawthorne: Human relations is a toll for understanding organization behavior, not an end in itself. Trust is crucial in building interpersonal relationships to bind the needs of people and organizations.
Trang 1THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT
THOUGHT, 6TH
EDITION
Electronic Resource by:
Regina Greenwood and Julia Teahen
Trang 2Human Relations in Concept and Practice
Chapter Seventeen
Trang 3Impact of Human Relations on
Teaching and Practice
Teachings::
Industry (the Chicago group) with Burleigh Gardner, William Whyte, Lloyd Warner, and David Moore
The Tavistock Institute (London) influenced by Lewin
Barnard and vice versa
Center for Group Dynamics of Kurt Lewin, later moved to the University of Michigan
as Likert’s Institute for Social Research
Trang 4Impact of Human Relations on Teaching and Practice
and Human
Relations:
Critics, such as
Mary B Gilson,
suggested human
relations had an
anti-labor bias
The
National Labor Relations Act of 1935
was followed by
a spurt in union
membership
Trang 5Compare the data regarding causes of work stoppages in the 1920s with the causes following passage of the National Labor Relations Act.
Impact of Human Relations on Teaching and Practice
"Police battle with striking truck drivers," Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1934; Franklin D Roosevelt Library, National Archives and Records Administration
http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=67#
Trang 6Impact of Human Relations on
Teaching and Practice
Feelings,
sentiments, and
collaboration
became the
theme in contrast
to scientific
investigation
This is the major
difference
between the
human relations
era and
organizational
http://www.uaw.org/solidarity/03/0103/pics/fea0
7-1.jpg
Trang 7Hawthorne Studies
Revisited
identified four separate areas of criticism:
The Mayoists’
view of society as one characterized
by anomie, social disorganization, and conflict
The Relay Assembly Test Room
Trang 8Hawthorne Studies
Revisited
of the worker and management’s
“willingness to manipulate workers for
management’s ends”
Their failure to recognize other
alternatives for accommodating industrial conflict, such as collective bargaining
Their specific failure to take unions into account as a method of building social
solidarity
Trang 9Premises of an Industrial
Civilization
Mayorists saw themselves as “social
engineers” and assumed that happy
workers were productive ones (“cow
sociology”).
according to Bell, did not address the
underlying problems in industry but only intended to make people “feel better” about their situation.
supervision replacing efforts to improve work itself.
Trang 10Premises of an Industrial
Civilization
human relations would become the goal rather than the means for furthering
attainment of organizational objectives.
human relations assumptions did so on these bases:
That cooperation and collaboration
overlooked other, more complex, issues
Trang 11Research Methods and
Results
Alex Carey noted that
the measurement
had changed in
reporting the results
of comparing the
Mica Splitters with
the second Relay
Assembly group In so
doing, the
researchers
concluded that
supervision, not
incentives, led to the
increases and Carey
says this is an
erroneous conclusion.
Mica Splitting Test at Hawthorne
Trang 12Research Methods and
Results
“friendly supervision.” Output did not increase until two operatives were
replaced with more “cooperative” ones.
neither supervision nor incentives but discipline, the economic hard times, and relief from fatigue that led to increased productivity Recall that Clair Turner
rejected this latter point as a cause.
Trang 13Research Methods and
Results
treated the Relay Assemblers as one
group when in fact there was the
original group and the change of
operatives that created a second group
He agreed with Schlaifer that the
“passage of time” explained most of the increased output.
that it took a while for the group to
coalesce and for trust to be built with the observer-supervisor, is also
supported by the recollections of the
participants.
Trang 14Research Methods and
Results
A final criticism rests with the
“Science versus Advocacy”
problem
issue is that Mayo selectively
perceived the data
to fit his social philosophy
Elton Mayo
Trang 15Research Methods and Results
This weighs heavily
against Mayo and is
one of the reasons the
Hawthorne Studies
have created so much
fuss
Richard Trahair, in The
Humanist Temper, an
excellent biography of
Mayo, and Richard
Gillespie, in a thorough
study, also stress
Mayo’s errors as an
advocate and not a
scientist Gillespie
claims that Mayo
“manufactured” the
Hawthorne findings.
Trang 16Research Methods and
Results
Finally, economic incentives were played down as a contributing factor as the Hawthorne Study proceeded and as the years passed
Yet the data and the recollections of the participants suggest that money was
indeed a contributing factor.
Hawthorne Study participants decades
later: Left to right: Theresa Layman, Don
Chipman, Mary Volango, and Wanda
Blazejak.
Trang 17of improving human relations in
organizations
Human relations is a toll for understanding organization behavior, not an end in itself.
Trust is crucial in building interpersonal
relationships to bind the needs of people and organizations.
Financial incentives are important but not the only incentives.
Selecting facts to fit preconceived ideas
should be avoided.