MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HOCHIMINH CITY……… Huỳnh Thị Ngọc Mai THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SERVICE QUALITY, CUSTOMER SATISFACTION and CUSTOMER LOYALTY IN CL
Trang 1MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HOCHIMINH CITY
………
Huỳnh Thị Ngọc Mai
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SERVICE QUALITY, CUSTOMER SATISFACTION and CUSTOMER LOYALTY IN CLEANING SERVICE INDUSTRY
An evidence of Pan Pacific Corporation
Trang 2ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to record my most sincere appreciation and heartfelt thanks toindividuals, of whom without, might not lead to the possibility of this research to berealized First and foremost, I wish to express my deep sincere gratitude to mysupervisor Dr.Tran Ha Minh Quan for his guidance, encouragement and excellentadvices throughout this study
I would like to extend my sincere thanks to assistant Prof Nguyen Dinh Tho,Dr.Nguyen Thi Mai Trang and Dr.Dinh Cong Khai for their valuable comments andconstructive suggestions
I would also like to avail this opportunity to express my appreciation toProfessor Nguyen Dong Phong and UEH Board of Directors for creating MBAprogram in English
I am also thankful to all my classmates in MBA class-Bath 16, especiallyMs.Nguyen Nhu Chang, Mr.Nguyen Thanh Trung, Mr.Lam Hong Phong, for theircollaboration and valuable assistance throughout my study
Gratitude also goes to Board of Management of Pan Pacific Corporation,colleagues for giving me supports Many thanks for Pan Pacific’s Clients who savevalue time to respond my survey questionnaire, without them my thesis could nothave been done
Last but not least, the express my profound gratitude to my beloved mother,
my lover and my closest friends for being patience and never failed giving mecontinuous supports, spiritually and encouragement along the study
Trang 3ABSTRACT
In the present cleaning service industry, service quality is a vital competitivepolicy to keep customers support and long-term cooperation Cleaning serviceproviders are trying to win customer satisfaction and loyalty by proving enhancedquality service The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between servicequality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in cleaning service industry Inthis study, attention is paid to the measurement model of service quality in cleaningservice industry based on the well-known SERVQUAL model, but withmodification on the basis of focus group discussions and expert opinions to reflectthe specific industry attributes and the special culture of Vietnam 158 samples werecollected from Pan Pacific Corporation’s various clients in the South of Vietnam.Cronbach Alpha was carried out to test the reliability of each statement and thesummated scales were formulated by means of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).Then, Multiple Linear Regressions test was used to test the effect of Service Quality
on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty, the effect of customer satisfaction
on loyalty Overall findings from this study suggest there were significantrelationship between Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty.The study found that there were six dimensions of cleaning service qualityincluding affectivity, cleaner competence, supervisor competence, tangibles, servicesafety, empathy and all dimensions are positively related to Customer Satisfaction.The regression test also found that there was a positive direction and significantrelationship between customer satisfaction on customer loyalty The resultsindicated that the overall service quality has significantly positive effect on overallcustomer loyalty Among these six dimensions except Empathy, all of them have asignificantly positive effect on overall customer loyalty
Keywords: cleaning service industry, service quality, customer satisfaction,
customer loyalty.
Trang 4TABLE OF CONTENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i
ABSTRACT ii
TABLE OF CONTENT iii
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction about cleaning service industry 1
1.2 Research background: 2
1.3 Research problem 4
1.4 Research Questions 5
1.5 Objectives of the study 5
1.6 Scope of the Study 5
1.7 Research method 6
1.8 Structure of the study 6
Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Service quality 8
2.2.1 Definition of service quality 8
2.2.1.1 Definition of “Quality” 8
2.2.1.2 Definition of “Service” 9
2.2.1.3 Definition of “service quality” 11
2.2.2 Measurement of service quality 11
2.2.3 Cleaning se rvice quality 16
2.2.3.1 Definition of “Cleaning” 16
2.2.3.2 Definition of cleaning service quality: 16
2.2.3.3 Determinants of cleaning service quality: 17
2.2.3.4 Cleaning quality awareness 20
2.2 Customer satisfaction 23
2.3 Customer loyalty 24
Trang 52.4 Relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and
loyalty 25
2.5.1 Relationship between Service quality and customer satisfaction 25
2.5.2 Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty 26
2.5.3 Relationship between service quality and customer loyalty 27
Chapter 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 29
3.1 Research design 29
3.2 Item generation 31
3.3.1 Items to measure Service Quality 32
3.3.2 Items to measure customer satisfaction 33
3.3.3 Items to measure customer loyalty 35
3.3 Preliminary study 35
3.4 Theoretical Model 37
3.5 Main survey 37
3.5.1 Sampling 37
3.5.2 Sample size 38
3.5.3 Survey method an d data collection 39
3.6 Data Analysis techniques 39
Chapter 4: DATA ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FINDINGS 41
4.1 Descriptive statistics of sample 41
4.2 Descriptive Analysis 44
4.3 Scales assessment 44
4.4.1 Reliability An alysis Results 44
4.4.2 Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) 46
4.4.2.1 Measurement scales of cleaning service quality 46
4.4.2.2 Measurement scales of customer loyalty 51
4.4.3 Adjustment of theoret ical model 54
4.4 Testing the research model and the hypotheses 55
4.4.1 Testing correlations between all constructs 55
Trang 64.4.2 Testing hypotheses 56
4.4.2.1 The relationship between Cleaning Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction 56
4.4.2.2 The relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty …………58
4.4.2.3 The relationship between cleaning service quality dimensions and customer loyalty 60
4.5 DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS 63
Chapter 5: CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 65
5.1 Conclusions of the study 65
5.2 Implications of the study 66
5.2.1 Theoretical implica tions 66
5.2.2 Practical implications 66
5.3 Limitations and recommendations for further research 68
APPENDIX 1- CUSTOMER SATISFACTION FEEDBACK 69
Vietnamese 73
English 73
SOME ACTIVITIES OF CLEANING SERVICES FOR REFERENCE 76
Trang 7LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1- Measurement scales of cleaning service quality 34
Table 3.2- Measurement scales of customer loyalty 35
Table 4.1- Sample characteristics 41
Table 4.2- Descriptive Statistics 44
Table 4.3 – Reliability of the measurement instrument 46
Table 4.4 – Rotated component matrix of cleaning service quality scale 50
Table 4.5 – Total Variance Explained of customer loyal 51
Table 4.6 – EFA result for individual measurement scales 52
Table 4 7-Final construct measurement scales 52
Table 4.8- Summary of hypotheses 55
Table 4.9– Correlation matrix 56
Table 4.9a- Model Summary (cleaning service and customer satisfaction) 57
Table 4.9b – Coefficients 58
Table 4.10a-Model Summary ( customer satisfaction and customer loyalty) 58
Table 4.10b – Coefficients 60
Table 4.11a - Model Summary ( service quality and customer loyalty) 61
Table 4 11b – Coefficients 61
Trang 8LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1- SERVQUAL gap analysis 13
Figure 3.1-Research process 31
Figure 3.2 - Theoretical Model 38
Figure 4.1a - Position of respondents 42
Figure 4.1b-Gender of respondents 43
Figure 4.1c - Service range of respondents 43
Figure 4.2 - Adjusted theoretical model 54
Figure 4.3- Hypothesis H1 testing result 58
Figure 4.4-Hypothesis H2 testing result 60
Figure 4.5 -Hypothesis H3 testing result 62
Trang 9Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
This chapter begins with general introduction about cleaning service and thecurrent study is provided with research background, research problem, researchobjectives and research questions are mentioned as the rationale for this study.Also, scope of the current study are discussed and an introduction of themethodology to be used in this chapter At the end of the chapter, the structure ofthis study is provided
1.1 Introduction about cleaning service industry
Nowadays, cleaning service is very popular in human life Cleaning serviceproviders is responsible for providing all necessary management, manpower,machinery, equipment, tools, chemicals (exclusive such items, which the Landlordshall provide), which were pre-approved by the Landlord to efficiently carry out thecleaning tasks of the project in accordant with the international standard andLandlord requirements They also provides uniformed, properly trained andappropriately skilled cleaners All cleaners have a yearly health check Cleanersshall at all time while on duty be dressed in full uniform, well groomed, clean-shaven, polite and helpful Service providers maintains the minimum number ofcontracted cleaners and provides additional cleaners as it determines necessary forfull cleaning coverage during sickness, holidays, etc
Using cleaning service bring to us much advantage : high quality service,reasonable fee, the professional and well trained working force from the leadingcompany in cleaning and property care, the modern specific cleaning equipmentswithout any investment, maintaining the value of the property, creation a clean andbeautiful working environment for both officers and visitors, avoidance fromdirectly management to the cleaning workers and risks from its potential problems,whole hearted concentration on own business
Trang 10Among of many cleaning service providers in Vietnam, Pan Pacific is oneleading company in this industry, with operating in over 20 cities and provincesnationwide, supplying cleaning service for more than 300 customers of manybusiness types Pan Pacific also is among of Vietnam largest cleaning providerswith over 5000 skilled employees With more than 17 years experience in cleaningservice industry, Pan Pacific has developed various customer system includingCommercial Buildings (office buildings, service apartments), Supermarkets andShopping Centers, Hospitals & Medical Centers, Factories in IPs, EPZs,International Schools Especially, Pan Pacific also have many experiences insupplying regular cleaning service for typical projects with highest level nationalsecurity such as; International Airports, Television Station.
1.2 Research background:
Going with developing real estate market and foreign investment, demand offacility management in office buildings, shopping centers, international schools,foreign factories are appeared These management services include security,property maintenance, pest controls, landscape and cleaning service In whichcleaning service industry is very important to enhance quality and brand of thebuilding
Instead of organizing and managing a cleaning division, owners can contractwith professional cleaning company which can provide package service includingmanpower, equipments, tools, chemicals A cleaning company will provideuniformed, properly trained and appropriately skilled cleaners, all cleaners have ayearly health check, cleaners shall at all time while on duty be dressed in fulluniform, well groomed, clean-shaven, polite and helpful Cleaning company willprovide additional cleaners as it determines necessary for full cleaning coverageduring sickness, holidays, etc Cleaning company also is responsible compensatingdamage of property which cause of their employees
Trang 11With lot of advantages bring to customer, industry cleaning service is firstchoice for Office Buildings, Shopping Centers, Shopping Malls, Foreign Factories,International Schools….By outsourcing, the owner can save their time toconcentrate main business fields.
Therefore, cleaning service industry in Vietnam has developed rapidly inrecently year with a lot of customers in many fields such as : almost OfficeBuildings with grade A-B-C have demand of using high-class cleaning service(Bitexco Financial Tower, Saigon Centre, Metropolitan, Sunwha, Kumho…),famous shopping centers (Diamond, Parkson,…), modern factories in electricity,pharmacy, food (Intel, P & G, Unilever, Kimberly Clack, Sanofi, Sonion…),international schools (VUS, VAS, ACG, RMIT, V-STAR, Bắc Mỹ, Việt Mỹ,Saigontech …), high-class service apartments (The Manor, Saigon Pearl, Somerset,Catavil…), Hotels ( Sheraton, Rex, Kumho, ) Number of cleaning providers alsoincrease quickly to meet market demand In the such competitive market,developing and keeping customer loyalty is essentially for business survival.Customer loyalty is another way to gain the best possible customer, repeatcustomers Not only do repeat customers tend to spend more money but they areoften the people who tend to provide the best word of mouth advertising possible
Especially in cleaning service industry, competition is rife Customer will nothesitate to terminate cleaning contract in the event that their needs and expectationsare not met In cleaning service, emphasis on the quality is a vital aspect in that itdetermines the level or degree of customer satisfaction A cleaning service providercan reduce the detrimental impact of effective factors by first ensuring that itscustomers are as highly satisfied with its services as possible
Cleaning service organizations are better positioned to reap the positiveoutcomes associated with having a largely satisfied customer base if they have anunderstanding of those factors that contribute to their customers’ satisfaction.Because meeting customers' expectations for key service quality attributes should
Trang 12lead to satisfied customers who, in turn, will remain loyal to the service andrecommend it to other potential customers.
1.3 Research problem
To evaluate how well their companies are meeting customer needs, servicemanagers often use measurements of service quality and customer satisfaction(Dabholkar, 1995) Therefore, service quality and customer satisfaction havereceived much attention from service marketers and academic researchers (Spreng
& MacKoy, 1996) In addition, Taylor (1997) has noted that the two constructs(service quality and customer satisfaction) have became very important formarketing theory and practice
Oliver (1997) suggested that profit for a company (purchase/repurchasebehavior by the consumer) was dependent on a sequence of three factors: Quality,satisfaction, and loyalty Quality has a direct influence on consumer satisfaction,which can be both a cognitive and affective dimension according to Oliver.Satisfaction, in turn, has a direct influence upon the loyalty of the consumer
A review of available literature found a lot of studies regardinginterrelationship of service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty.But it is lacking in studies of cleaning service, there is only one published study(Anthony M Kyengo, April 2007) examine quality control in cleaning service
In this circumstance, not only Pan Pacific but also Vietnamese cleaning servicecompanies realize the necessity of empirical studying to examine specificallyinfluences of their service to customers’ behavior They need know that, what specificaspects of their services influence customers in terms of their satisfaction and theirperceptions of service quality, which, in turn, lead to customer loyalty?
Trang 131.4 Research Questions
Base on the above stated research problem the following research questions havebeen developed:
Q.1 What are the service quality dimensions in cleaning service industry
Q.2 How do the dimensions of service quality effect on customer satisfaction,
customer loyalty in cleaning service industry
Q.3 Is there any significant relationship between customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty in cleaning service?
1.5 Objectives of the study
The objectives of this study are to:
Explore the relationship between the components of service quality withcustomer satisfaction and customer loyalty
Explore the relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty
1.6 Scope of the Study
In general Pan Pacific Corporation provides three types of core services totheir customers such as cleaning service, pest control service and laundry service,with activities spreading from the North, the Middle to the South of Vietnam Inwhich, most of current customers concentrate on cleaning service For the purpose
of this study, the study will focus particularly in the areas of cleaning serviceoffered by Pan Pacific which is leading company in cleaning service industry Inaddition, customer information from other competitors is usually confidential andhard to obtain The respondents of the research was categorized to those currentcustomers who use the services directly
Trang 141.7 Research method
This study was conducted with two stages:
A preliminary study: in the first stage, a qualitative approach was applied
in order to explore whether the scale for measuring cleaning servicequality This step was carried out by using group discussion techniques
The main study: A quantitative approach was used to examine researchquestions Data were collected by using survey questionnaire Pan Pacific’scustomers and SPSS software version 16 was used for data analysis.Cronbach’s Alpha test was carried out to test the reliability of themeasurement scales, and then using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Theresearch model and hypotheses were tested by using Multiple LinearRegression analysis (MLR)
The methodology for this study will be come back with more detail Chapter 4
1.8 Structure of the study
Chapter 1 will discuss on the research background, research problem,objectives of the study, scope and method of the research Pan PacificCorporation are also mentioned in the chapter as a glance
Chapter 2 describes about various reviews on past literatures whichdiscussed about service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyaltyand their relationship
Chapter 3 explains how the research methodology, the development of thehypotheses, data collections and the types of data analysis have been carriedout to make sure all the data are reliable and the findings are valid
Trang 15 Chapter 4 will discuss on research results in detail, describes sampling andprocessing data, presents analyzing the data collected and the findings ofthe study.
Chapter 5 will conclude and recommend the findings The findings of theresearch are expected to give guidance to cleaning service companies inprioritized their service
Trang 16Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter will give an overview of literature review and models that arerelated to the research problem presented in the previous chapter In this chapter theconcepts of service quality, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty and relationship
of them will be introduced The aim of this review is to generate hypotheses thatwill be tested in the cleaning service to answer the research questions and toconfirm the research model Additional, details of cleaning service quality literature
is also mentioned in this chapter
2.1 Service quality
2.1.1 Definition of service quality
2.1.1.1 Definition of “Quality”
To understand what “Service Quality” is, we need to understand what is
“Quality” and it’s concept as a whole Understanding the term “Quality” will revealthat the concept has been defined in many different ways and with differentemphasis by the various quality gurus and writers on the subject Quality is anelusive and indistinct construct Often mistaken for imprecise adjective like
“goodness, or luxury, or shininess, or weight” (Crosby 1979), quality and itsrequirements are not easily articulated by consumers (Takeuchi and Quelch 1983).Quality has been defined (Taylor and Baker, 1994) as superiority or excellence(Zeithaml, 1988), or as the consumer’s overall impression of the relativeinferiorityor superiority of a service provider and its services (Bitner & Hubbert,1994; Keiningham et al., 1994/1995)
Most of the efforts in defining and measuring quality are coming from thegoods sector According to the prevailing Japanese philosophy, quality is “zerodefects – doing it right the first time” However, understanding of quality in goodsand its importance is not sufficient to understand service quality
Trang 172.1.1.2 Definition of “Service”
A service is an economic activity that produces time, place, form, orpsychological utility Four well documented characteristics of services –intangibility, heterogeneity, perishability and inseparability – must beacknowledged for a full understanding of service quality (Parasuraman, Zeithamland Berry 1985) :
Intangibility
Services are activities or benefits or benefits that are essentially intangible,cannot be prefabricated in advance and do not involve ownership of the title (York,1993) They may include the traditional personal assistance service, for instance,baby-sitter, gardener etc The fix it service such as mechanic, repairman, etc andfinally the value added service as the least tangible of all (Cotter, 1993) Mostservices are intangible (Bateson 1977,Berry 1980, Lovelock 1981, Shostak 1977).Because they are performances rather than objects, precise manufacturingspecifications concerning uniform quality can rarely be set Most services cannot becounted, measured, inventoried, tested and verified in advance of sale to assurequality (Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry 1985) Because service is not an objectbut a phenomenon, it is difficult for customers to evaluate the quality of services asthey evaluate physical goods Because of intangibility, the firm may find it difficult
to understand how consumers perceive their services and evaluate service quality(Zeithaml 1981)
Heterogeneity
Services, especially those with high labor content, are heterogeneous; theirperformance often varies from producer to producer, from customer to customer,and from day to day (Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry 1985) Consistency ofbehavior from service personnel (ie uniform quality) is difficult to assure (Booms
Trang 181 0
and Bitner 1981) because what the firm intends to deliver may be entirely different from what customer receives
Inseparability
Production and consumption of many services are inseparable (Carmen andLangeared 1980, Gronroos 1978, Regan 1963, Upah 1980) Services involvesimultaneous production and consumption Inseparability implies that service issimultaneously produced and consumed while physical goods are first produced,then sold and finally consumed Inseparability of production and consumption oftenforces the involvement of the customer in the production process Inseparabilityalso means that the producer and the vendor often compromise one economic entity(York 1993) In labor intensive services for example, quality occurs during servicedelivery, usually in an interaction between the client and the contact person fromthe service firm (Lehtinen and Lehtinen 1982) In this situation, the customer inputbecomes critical to the quality of service performance
Perishability
The inseparability of production and consumption in turn results in aninability to store service capability Perishability means that services cannot beproduced in advance, inventoried and later made available for sale Services areperformance that cannot be stored (Zeithaml, 1998) It is often difficult toadequately match up with demand and supply such as those corrective maintenanceworks, for instance, heating and cooling repairs
In conclusion, base on the examination of those writing and other literaturereviews on services (Gronroos 1982; Lehtinen and Lehtinen 1982; Lewis andBooms 1983; Saser, Olsen, and Wyckoff 1978) Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry in
1985 suggest three attributes of service quality:
Trang 192.1.1.3 Definition of “service quality”
Despite of all the debates, many researchers were traditionally agreed andaccepted that service quality is a comparison between expectations with perceptions
of performance Perceived quality is the consumer’s judgment about an entity’soverall excellence or superiority (Zeithaml 1987) It is clearly differs from objectivequality (as define by few researcher, for example, Garvin (1983) and Hjorth-Anderson (1984)) Parasuraman et al (1985) defined service quality as “the globalevaluation or attitude of overall excellence of service” So, service quality is thedifference between customers’ expectation and perceptions of services delivered byservice firms
2.1.2 Measurement of service quality
Ducker (1991) defines service quality as “what the customer gets out and
is willing to pay for” rather than “what the supplier (of the service) puts in”.Hence, service quality is often “conceptualized as the comparison of serviceexpectations with actual performance perceptions” (Bloemer, Ruyter et al 1999;Kara, Lonial et al 2005) Service science literature often relies on SERVQUAL
as an instrument to measure quality of service provided SERVQUAL scalewas developed based on a marketing perspective with the support of the MarketingScience Institute (Parasuraman, Zeithaml et al 1986) Previous research confirmsits use as applicable to healthcare environment (Babakus 1992; Dean 1999; Arasli,
Trang 20Ekiz et al 2008) For a thorough analysis of SERVQUAL see Nyeck et al.(2002) SERVQUAL principle primarily relies on a gap model (Parasuraman,Zeithaml et al 1985) (Figure 2.2) Every gap in SERVQUAL has a unique role asfollows:
• Gap 1: difference between consumer expectations and management perceptions ofconsumer expectations
• Gap 2: difference between management perceptions of consumer expectations andservice quality specifications
• Gap 3: difference between service quality specifications and the service actuallydelivered
• Gap 4: difference between service delivery and what is communicated about theservice to the consumer
• Gap 5: difference between consumer expectations and perceptions
The construct of service quality as conceptualized in the service marketingliterature centers on perceived quality, defined as a consumer’s judgment about anentity’s overall excellence or superiority (Parasuraman et al., 1988; Zeithaml, 1988;Bitner, 1990) In other words, Service quality can be defined as a measure of howwell the service delivered matches the customer expectation of the service Gronroos(1982) considers services as products requiring, to a large extent, the consumer’sinvolvement in the process of production and consumption, during whichconsumers compare their expectations about the service with what they actuallyreceive The result of this comparison is perceived service quality (Parasuraman etal., 1985, 1988)
Therefore, it is how customers perceive the quality of service thatshould be of key concern to managers To assist managers inunderstanding their customers'
Trang 21Service delivery (including pre and post- contacts)
Communication to Customer GAP 1
Translation of Perception into Service Quality spec.
GAP 2
Management Perception of Customer Expectation
perceptions of quality, Parasuraman et al (1988) devised theSERVQUAL instrument This instrument is intended to capture therange of attributes important to consumers of a service
Figure 2.1- SERVQUAL gap analysis
Source: (Parasuraman, Zeithaml et al 1985)
Trang 22Originally Parasuraman et al (1985) identified ten generaldimensions of service quality such as responsiveness,competence, access, courtesy, communication, credibility,security, understanding, knowing the customer and tangibility,but as a result of succeeding research, these were collapsed intofive dimensions (Parasuraman et al., 1988, 1991) that link specificservice characteristics to consumers’ expectations as follows:
a) Reliability : ability to perform promised service as dependably and accurately
b) Responsiveness : Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service
c) Assurance Knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability toinspire trust and confidence
d) Empathy: Ability to be approachable and also service aspect that stresses thetreatment of customers individuals
e) Tangibles : focus on the elements that represent the service physically (physical facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel;)
Service quality
Parasuraman et al (1988)
Reliability
RELI1 Providing services as promised
RELI2 Dependability in handling customers' service performed
RELI3 Performing the services right the first time
RELI4 Providing services at the promised time
Trang 23RELI5 Keeping customers informed about when services will be performed
Responsiveness
RES1.Prompt service to customers
RES2 Willing to help customers
RES3 Readiness to respond to customers' requests
Assurance
ASS1 Employees who instill confidence in customers
ASS2 Making customers feel safe in their transaction
ASS3 Employees who are consistently courteous
ASS4 Knowledgeable employee to answer customer questions
Empathy
EMP1 Giving customers individual attention
EMP2 Employees who deal with customers in a caring fashion
EMP3 Having the customer's best interest at heart
EMP4 Employees who understand the needs of their customers
Tangibles
TANG1 Modern equipment
TANG2 Visually appealing facilities
TANG3 Employees who have a neat, professional appearance
Trang 24TANG4 Visually appealing materials associated with the service
TANG5 Convenient business hour
2.1.3 Cleaning service quality
2.1.3.1 Definition of “Cleaning”
Cleaning is a part of a facility maintenance activity that aim at increasing andmaintaining the overall life cycle of the facility and, at the same provide a humansupport for an effective working environment to facility’s occupiers
Cleaning is a process that is systematic in nature and aim at the removal ofunwanted matter in our environment The end result of cleaning is to ensure thatunwanted matter is cleaned and maintained to a certain safe degree zone that reducerisk levels to human health The cleaning process then need to be achieved by usingthe highest degree of monitoring system or standard available the time Thesestandard are controls, which are implemented in order to effectively achieve thedesired quality in the cleaning That process of implementing and monitoring camthen be classified as quality control (Anthony M,2007, 5)
2.1.3.2 Definition of cleaning service quality:
Cleaning service quality cannot be easily measured as it perceived different
by every individual In most cases, Quality signifies excellence and reliability, butagain, this also defer from each customer’s point of view
The term quality exists in many definitions and many scholars haveendeavored to define quality as it used in different context In service operation,quality can be defined as: “the right thing, as the right place, as the right time” (wright 1999, 169) In management, quality is seen as “ meeting the customerrequirements” ( Oakland 1993,5)
Trang 25In the cleaning industry, cleaning service quality is the ability to meet thecustomer expectations and needs If the customers’ s experiences of the cleaningservice correspond with his assumptions, then he consider the overall quality good(huilaja 1998, 22).
Cleaning quality can also be defined and described as the extent to which thecleaning upkeep satisfied and continues satisfy the requirements specified for theuse and function of the rooms (Bound 2002,10-11) The quality is good if the user
of the room in question are satisfied and remain so This applies when the cleaningcan be carried out property, with the correct frequency and under normal conditions
2.1.3.3 Determinants of cleaning service quality:
All business point of view, will ague that the customer is always right, In thiscontext, it means that the customer determines the quality of work However, theoverall quality of cleaning service ( Bound 2002,10) is determined by :
Cost (Price)
Reliabilities of the service provider
Responding to disasters and resolving complaints
Customer need and expectations
The organization’s principles and working mechanisms (the efficient of use resources and technology, competition analysis )
Cleaning quality
Cost/Price
In cleaning service, cost bear heavily in customer’s mind as it is used togauge the level of quality desired The more the customer need and expectation are
Trang 26clarified the more the cost will be and vice versa When defining the level ofquality, one should compare the effect of various quality levels with the cost Forexample, spaces with a low frequency use and which collect little dirt and employsparse cleaning are not worth the most expensive alternative Thus they reduce thecost of cleaning.
Reliability of the service provider
Reliability of the service provider means that services are provided in acontinuous consistent way Customer are assured of good quality and the deliverysystem, which is the cleaning company, offers guarantee, to that effect It isimportant that things are made right at the first time When cleaning agreementhave been reached and finalized, then it is up to cleaning company to fulfills thecleaning obligation state in the contract
Responding to disaster and resolving complaints
Cleaning companies have an obligation to respond to a crisis caused duringthe process of cleaning and also unforeseen customer emergencies It is up to thecleaning company to respond to that customer’s needs by arranging that the service
be delivered and performed to meet the customer’s expectation Customer need tobuild trust for the service providers Cleaning companies in turn should respond thesame way by guaranteeing and maintaining a stable relationship with the customer.The relationship should work both ways
Customer need and expectation
Cleaning company at the first introduction to a customer should avail theneed to tailor services according to the customer’s expectations, needs andassumptions Negotiations entered should focus on finding out what the workdetails entail Then in turn, the cleaning company can afford to measure and
Trang 27question whether it is capable of delivering the kind of cleaning quality for the expectations desired.
The organization’s principle and working mechanisms
The organization or cleaning company take full responsibility of the qualityonce an agreement has been reached and a contract signed with a client This is themoment of trust and the company should be able to demonstrate an increased andsustained level of quality in order to maintain its customer base and trust Brokenpromises or misguided truths are time bombs that reflect negatively on thecompany’s image and performance
Cleaning quality
The cleaning quality is the major concern that all customers requestingcleaning services with fulfilled It is important that the cleaning quality meets therequirement and expectation of the resident and customers at an affordable priceand that the process should always remain clearly defined so as to providesatisfaction to both parties
Cleaning has a purpose and the five major reasons for cleaning are stipulated
as ( Allen 1993, 198-199):
Prevention of the spread of infection and disease
The most important aspect of cleaning is the prevention and removal ofdisease causing bacteria This lead to cleaner environment Different spacesrequire different standards of hygiene and also methods of cleaning Highrisk area include hospitals, operating, theatres, clinics, kitchens and sanitaryaccommodations
Dust control
Trang 282 0
Dust level have to be controlled to certain acceptable levels Not only doesthis apply to industrial working environment e.g in manufacturing,pharmaceuticals and electronics to mention a few, but also to schools,offices, kindergartens and homes High level of dust or fumes in theatmosphere are harmful to human health These levels must be controlledthrough cleaning
Preservation of the fabric, fixture, fittings and furnishings
The accumulation of dust, grease and other types of soils eventually lead tothe progressive deterioration of building and their furnishings Neglect of theprocess of cleaning accelerates damage and the eventual costs of repairs arehigher and the methods applied to restore the facility can also cause furtherdamage
Provision of a socially acceptable environment
A socially acceptable and attractive working environment enhancesproductivity People working in clean environment are most likely to yieldhigher productivity than their counterparts A clean environment is not onlyrespectable, but also offer mental comfort and employee happiness
Safety :
The cleaning process includes the removal of obstacles and substances thattend to obstruct The act alone allows for minor or major accident to becontrolled Standards of cleaning must be sufficient to meet health and safety
at work requirement
2.1.3.4 Cleaning quality awareness
According to john Bound (2002,12), quality experience of the customer goes (much) further than “only the proper execution of the cleaning work.” In addition to
Trang 29 Being addressed by receptionist
Speed of being called back
Inspection, instruction, training
Recruitment, selection, training and supervision
Professionalism
Empathy (having the customer’s interest at heat)
Trang 30The SERVQUAL scale could be used in different service industries andcontexts However, in later work (Parasuraman et al., 1993), they did acknowledgethe need for context-specific tailoring of the instrument Besides, after acomprehensive review of service quality studies, Asubonteng, McCleary, and Swan(1996) concluded that the number of service quality dimensions varies in differentindustries For example, Kettinger and Lee (1994) identified four dimensions in astudy of in formation systems (IS) quality, which did not have tangible dimension.Cronin and Taylor (1992) developed a one factor measurement instrument instead
of the five-factor measures proposed by Parasuraman et al (1988) Sureshchandar,Rajendran, and Anantharaman in (2003) have identified five factors of servicequality from the customers’ perspective As mentioned, the overall quality ofcleaning service (Bound 2002,10) is determined by six factors In Vietnam, manystudies conducted in SERVQUAL such as: Nguyen Dinh Tho et al (2003)identified four dimensions for outdoor entertainment service In addition, Ha ThiHon Tuoi (2009) conducted a study on wedding party service and the resultindicated proposed 6 dimensions of service quality in which keeping 5 dimensionsfrom SERVQUAL( realibility, responsiveness, assurance, tangible, empathy) and 1additional dimension “ convenient approach” Nguyen Thi Mai Trang and NguyenDinh Tho (2006) defined 5 factors of service quality in Viet Nam supermarketservice (goods, staff competence, display, space, safety,) these factor have changedcompare with SERQUAL instrument Besides, in Vietnam research on servicequality has been undertaken in many service contexts such as banking,telecommunication, customs, education Cleaning service quality has general pointswith other services, the result from study of Bound (2002) showed that some factors
of cleaning service quality including reliability, responsiveness In general, cleaningservice company provides service including manpower, tools, equipment, chemical,and these are related to “assurance”, “tangible” factors In addition, cleaning service
is high-contact service between customer and staffs of cleaning service provider(cleaners, supervisors), hence “assurance” and “empathy” are also main factors
Trang 31cleaning service quality Overall, the results from these studies also concluded thatnumber of service quality dimensions is varies in different industries, therefore need
to have continuing study in specific services and markets as cleaning service inVietnam
In summary, the research should be apply SERQUAL instrument inmeasurement cleaning service quality in Vietnam, however quality service scale inspecific-context need to be adjusted and supplemented Hence, the researcher alsoassumes that there should be some adjustments of the measurement scale in order tomake the research model more suitable for the cleaning service in Vietnam
2.2 Customer satisfaction
Customer satisfaction is a complex construct It has been defined in variousways Kotler (1996) defined customer satisfaction as ‘the level of the people feltstate resulting from comparing a product’s perceived performance or outcome inviolation to his/her own expectations” Oliver (1997) defines satisfaction as as “ajudgment that a product or service feature, or the product or service itself, provided(or is providing) a pleasurable level of consumption-related fulfillment” (p 13) and
“the consumer's fulfillment response, the degree to which the level of fulfillment ispleasant or unpleasant” (p 28)
Customer satisfaction is the feeling you have when your needs as a customer arefulfilled and meeting the customer's expectations for key service quality attributeslead to overall satisfaction with service Satisfied customers will be more likely touse the service again, or will tell other potential customers positive things about theservice (Patterson and Spreng, 1997) In turn, measuring customer satisfaction canprovide managers with relatively reliable indicators of future customer support fortheir services According to Boselie, Hesselink, and Wiele (2002) satisfaction is apositive, affective state resulting from the appraisal of all aspects of a party’sworking relationship with another
Trang 32Literature has also made the distinction between overall satisfaction andattribute satisfaction Overall satisfaction results from overall experience whileattribute satisfaction is based on assessment of performance of individual attributes(Oliver, 1993) According to Levesque and McDougall (1996) satisfaction isconceptualized as an overall, customer attitude towards a service provider It wastherefore, client satisfaction construct in this paper will be measured through overallsatisfaction toward the services.
2.3 Customer loyalty
The conceptualization of the loyalty construct has evolved over the years Intoday’s changing global environment, every organization is searching for innovativeways to achieve competitive advantage, increase customer loyalty, and improveefficiency without sacrificing quality of service (Javalgi and Moberg, 1997)
Service loyalty, with its final effect on repurchasing by customers, is perhapsone of the most important constructs in service marketing Indeed, loyal customersthat indulge in repeat purchases are the base of any business (Caruana, 2002) Somehave tagged customer loyalty as a key source of competitive advantage (Bharadwaj
et al., 1993) and a key to firm survival and growth (Reichheld, 1996) However,how “loyalty” has been conceptualized and measured has varied considerablyacross studies, resulting in calls for more research into the fundamental meaning ofloyalty (Oliver, 1999)
In the services context, intangible attributes such as reliability andconfidence may play a major role in building or maintaining loyalty (Dick andBasu, 1994) In a services context, loyalty is frequently defined as observedbehaviour (Liljander and Strandvik, 1995) Pearson (1996) has defined customerloyalty as the mind set of the customers who hold favorable attitudes toward acompany, commit to repurchase the company’s product/service, and recommend theproduct/service to others Jones and Sasser (1995) posit industry structure as an
Trang 33explanation for increasing and decreasing returns of satisfaction In markets withintense competition, satisfaction shows increasing return and any decline insatisfaction results in rapid drop in loyalty Hence, merely satisfied and completelysatisfied customers exhibit dramatically different levels of loyalty Anderson andMittal (2000) suggest that increasing returns for satisfaction occurs particularlywhen the company’s service performance exceeds customer expectations
2.4 Relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty
2.4.1 Relationship between Service quality and customer satisfaction
Over the past few years there has been a heightened emphasis on servicequality and customer satisfaction in business and academia alike Sureshchandar et
al, (2003) identified that strong relationships exist between service quality andcustomer satisfaction while emphasizing that these two are conceptually distinctconstructs from the customers’ point of view Spreng and Mackoy (1996) alsoshowed that service quality leads to customer satisfaction while working on themodel developed by Oliver (1997) Bitner et al (1994) and Anderson et al (1994)also point to this link by suggesting that improved service quality will result in asatisfied customer and suggest that to a large extent this relationship is intuitive In arecent study conducted by Ribbink et.al (2004) revealed that this relationship alsoexists in the e-commerce industry
Moreover, after a comprehensive studies review of relationship betweenservice quality and customer satisfaction, the results showed that each components
of SERQUAL has positively related to customer satisfaction The important level ofeach components of SERQUAL on customer satisfaction is different in every kind
of service Mohammad Suhainy Abdull Rahim (2009) concluded that “Reliability”
is as the most important dimension to customer satisfaction, next are tangible ,assurance, empathy and responsiveness is the least important The study of Chich–
Trang 34Jen Shieh (2006) in library service found that all dimensions had significantlypositive impacts on user satisfaction In addition, a result from study of Ha Thi HonTuoi (2009) in wedding party service showed that all dimensions of SERQUALhave positively related to customer satisfaction, in which “reliability” rated the bestimportant and “empathy” rated the least important.
As mentioned in 2.2.4, all components of SERQUAL appropriate in applying
of cleaning service quality Consistent with these findings, the researcher hashypothesized the following :
Hypothesis 1: Overall, Service quality is positively related to customer satisfaction
in cleaning service industry.
H1a: “Reliability” of service quality is positively related to customer satisfaction H1b: “Responsiveness” of service quality is positively related to customer
satisfaction
H1c: “Assurance” of service quality is positively related to customer satisfaction H1d: “Tangible” of service quality is positively related to customer satisfaction H1e: “Empathy” of service quality is positively related to customer satisfaction 2.4.2 Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty
Customer satisfaction does not always lead to loyalty; however, it iswidely agreed in the literature that satisfaction is the key precursor to customerloyalty According to Oliver (1999), “satisfaction is defined as pleasurablefulfillment That is, the consumer senses that consumption fulfills some need,desire, goal, or so forth and that this fulfillment is pleasurable” Several authorshave found a positive correlation between customer satisfaction and loyalty(Anderson & Sullivan, 1993; Bolton and Drew, 1991; Fornell, 1992) In which,Fornell (1992) argues that high customer satisfaction will result in increased loyalty
Trang 35for the firm and that customers will be less prone to overtures from competition.Anderson and Fornell (1994) point out that customer loyalty is determined to a largeextent by customer satisfaction Satisfaction is thus viewed as an antecedent ofrelative attitude because without satisfaction consumers will not hold a favorableattitude towards a brand as compared to other alternatives available (Dick and Basu,1994).
Numerous studies in the service sector have also empirically validated thelink between satisfaction and behavioral intentions such as customer retention andword of mouth (Anderson and Sullivan, 1993; Bansal and Taylor, 1999; Cronin andTaylor, 2000) Hart and Johnson (1999) have added that one of the conditions oftrue customer loyalty is total satisfaction Hence, hypothesis 2 is proposed :
Hypothesis 2: Customer satisfaction is positively related to customer loyalty in cleaning service industry.
2.4.3 Relationship between service quality and customer loyalty
In various studies, the relationship between service quality and customerloyalty had been examined (Boulding, Kalra, Staelin, & Zeithaml, 1993; Cronin &Taylor, 1992) In their study Cronin and Taylor (1992) focused solely on repurchaseintentions, whereas Boulding et al (1993) focused on the elements of repurchasing
as well as the willingness to recommend In the study by Cronin and Taylor servicequality did not appear to have a significant (positive) effect on repurchase intentions(in contrast to the significant positive impact of satisfaction on repurchaseintention), whereas Boulding et al (1993) found positive relationships betweenservice quality and repurchase intentions and willingness to recommend Therefore,following hypothesis has been proposed:
Trang 36Hypothesis 3: Service quality is positively related to customer loyalty in cleaning service industry.
H1a: “Reliability” of service quality is positively related to customer loyalty
H1b: “Responsiveness” of service quality is positively related to customer loyalty H1c: “Assurance” of service quality is positively related to customer loyalty
H1d: “Tangible” of service quality is positively related to customer loyalty
H1e: “Empathy” of service quality is positively related to customer loyalty
After reviewing the literatures, main three hypotheses have been proposed and are summarized as propose in the article 2.5.2
The methodology is conducted to test the main three hypotheses and find outdimensions of cleaning service quality is presented in the following chapter
Trang 37Chapter 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The previous chapter provides literature review of service quality, cleaningservice quality, customer satisfaction, service loyalty and relationship of them Thischapter will provide the Theoretical Model based on the literature review and aqualitative study, it also introduces research methodology using to build andassess the measurement scales, the statistical techniques employed to analyzethe data, and testing the research hypotheses and research model as well
Business research is defined “as a systematic inquiry whoseobjective is to provide information to solve a managerial problem” (DonaldR.C & Pamela S.S., 2003) Based on the purpose of research, researchers often use one of the following three types
Exploratory research is useful when the research question are vague
or when there is little theory available for guide predictions or when there is
a need to clarify the understanding of a problem Exploratory research isused to develop a better understanding( Hair, Babin, Money and Samouel2003) There are three principle ways of conducting exploratory research :
a search of the literature, talking to experts in the subject, conducting focusgroup interviews (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill 2003)
Descriptive research describes some situation General things are
described by providing measures of an event and activity The objective ofdescriptive studies is “to portray an accurate profile of persons, events or
Trang 383 0
situations” (Robson, 1993) This may be an extension of an exploratoryresearch It is necessary to have a clear picture of the phenomena on whichresearcher wish to collect data prior to the collection of the data (Saunders,Lewis and Thornhill 2003)
Causal or Explanatory studies establish causal relationships between
variables The emphasis here is o n studying a situation or a problem in order
to explain the relationship between variables (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill2003)
The purpose of the research is mainly descriptive and explanatory It
is descriptive because descriptive data has been collected throughquestionnaire survey and it is also explanatory since we will explain therelationship between service quality variables and customer satisfaction andhow these dimensions affect customer satisfaction In summary, acombination of descriptive and explanatory ( causal research) is chosen forthis research It is somewhat exploratory nature since we are exploring therelationship between service quality variables and satisfaction based onprevious theories to develop a better understanding about the research area
Business research methods can be classified on the basis of eitherfunction or technique (Zikmund 1997) In term of technique, businessresearch can be classified into experiments, surveys and observationalstudies (Zikmund 1997)
In this study, data was collected by using a survey technique Thistechnique “provides a quick, efficient and accurate means of assessinginformation on a population, especially in the case of a lack of secondarydata” (Zikmund, 1997- cited in Quan, 2006)
The research process of this study is shown in figure 3.2
Trang 39Figure 3.1-Research process
Final draft of questionnaire
Main quantitative study :A Survey of 158 customers
DROP
Item(s) with
item-total correlation < 3
EFA : Exploratory Factor Analysis
MLR : Multiple Linear Regression
Item(s) with factor loading< 5
Item modifications
Trang 40In order to measure the constructs in the study, multi-item scales areemployed and existing measures present in the literature are used All items aremeasured on a five-point Likert type scale, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree.
3.2.1 Items to measure Service Quality
As discussed in chapter two, The SERVQUAL scale could be used indifferent service industries and contexts, especially in high contact service such ascleaning service industry
Besides, as mentioned in this study, overall of cleaning service quality(Bound,2002) is determined by cost (Price), reliabilities of the service provider,responding to disasters and resolving complaints, customer need and expectations,the organization’s principles and working mechanisms (the efficient of useresources and technology, competition analysis ), cleaning quality However, after
a comprehensive review of service quality studies, number and content of service
quality dimensions varies in different industries, services and markets.
Therefore, to do research in a specific market, some amendment andcomplement might be needed Cleaning service quality in this study is measured bymainly adapting SERQUAL scale, contents of cleaning service quality developing
by Bound, 2002
After carrying out preliminary study by using group discussion approach, as
a result customer of cleaning service is interest in six main factors as follows :
1 Reliability of the service provider: services are provided in a continuous
consistent way and the cleaning company to fulfill the cleaning obligationstated in the contract
2 Responsiveness : responding to customer requests and solving complaints