1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

Business statistics a decision making approach 6th edition ch12ppln

26 16 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 26
Dung lượng 812 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010 Prentice-Chapter Goals After completing this chapter, you should be able to:  Use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to de

Trang 1

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Trang 2

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-Chapter Goals

After completing this chapter, you should be

able to:

 Use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to

determine whether data fits a specified distribution

 Set up a contingency analysis table and perform a chi-square test of independence

Trang 3

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

 Does sample data conform to a hypothesized

Trang 4

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice- Are technical support calls equal across all days of the week? (i.e., do calls follow a uniform distribution?)

 Sample data for 10 days per day of week:

Sum of calls for this day:

Monday 290 Tuesday 250 Wednesday 238 Thursday 257 Friday 265 Saturday 230 Sunday 192

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit

Test

(continue d)

 = 1722

Trang 5

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Logic of Goodness-of-Fit Test

If calls are uniformly distributed, the 1722 calls

would be expected to be equally divided across the 7 days:

 Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test: test to see if the sample results are consistent with the

expected results

uniform if

day per

calls expected

246 7

1722

Trang 6

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-Observed vs Expected

Frequencies

Observed

o i Expected e i Monday

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

290 250 238 257 265 230 192

246 246 246 246 246 246 246

Trang 7

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Chi-Square Test Statistic

 The test statistic is

1) k

df (where

e

) e (o

i

2 i i

o i = observed cell frequency for category i

e i = expected cell frequency for category i

H 0 : The distribution of calls is uniform over days of the week

H A : The distribution of calls is not uniform

Trang 8

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-The Rejection Region

2

e

) e o

(with k – 1 degrees

Trang 9

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

23.05 246

246)

(192

246

246)

(250 246

246)

2        

Chi-Square Test Statistic

H0: The distribution of calls is uniform over days of the week

HA: The distribution of calls is not uniform

0

 = 05

Reject H0

Do not reject H0

 2

k – 1 = 6 (7 days of the week) so

use 6 degrees of freedom:

 2 05 = 12.5916

 2 05 = 12.5916

Conclusion:

2 = 23.05 > 2

 = 12.5916 so

distribution is not uniform

Trang 10

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

follow a normal distribution with μ = 50 and σ

= 15?

 Process:

 Get sample data

 Group sample results into classes (cells) (Expected cell frequency must be at least

5 for each cell)

 Compare actual cell frequencies with expected cell frequencies

Normal Distribution Example

Trang 11

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Normal Distribution Example

150 Sample Measurements

80 65 36 66 50 38 57 77 59

 Sample data and values grouped into classes:

Trang 12

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice- What are the expected frequencies for these classes for

a normal distribution with μ = 50 and σ = 15?

(continue d)

•Class •Frequency Frequency •Expected

Trang 13

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Example:

.0912

1.3333) P(z

15

50 30

z P 30) P(x

(.0912)(15 

Trang 14

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-The Test Statistic

e

) e o

2

2 α

Trang 15

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

The Rejection Region

097

12 57

0

) 57 0 2

(

68 13

) 68 13 10

( e

) e o

i

2 i i

 2

8 classes so use 7 d.f.:

 2 05 = 14.0671

Trang 16

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-Contingency Tables

Contingency Tables

 Situations involving multiple population

proportions

 Used to classify sample observations according

to two or more characteristics

 Also called a crosstabulation table.

Trang 17

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Contingency Table Example

H 0 : Hand preference is independent of gender

H A : Hand preference is not independent of gender

Left-Handed vs Gender

 Dominant Hand: Left vs Right

 Gender: Male vs Female

Trang 18

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-Contingency Table Example

Sample results organized in a contingency table:

(continue d)

Gender

Hand Preference Left Right Female 12 108 120

Trang 19

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Logic of the Test

 If H 0 is true, then the proportion of left-handed females should be the same as the proportion of left-handed males

 The two proportions above should be the same as the proportion of left-handed people overall

H 0 : Hand preference is independent of gender

H A : Hand preference is not independent of gender

Trang 20

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-Finding Expected

Frequencies

Overall:

P(Left Handed) = 36/300 = 12

120 Females, 12 were left handed

180 Males, 24 were left handed

If independent, then

P(Left Handed | Female) = P(Left Handed | Male) = 12

So we would expect 12% of the 120 females and 12% of the 180

males to be left handed…

i.e., we would expect (120)(.12) = 14.4 females to be left handed

(180)(.12) = 21.6 males to be left handed

Trang 21

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Expected Cell Frequencies

 Expected cell frequencies:

(continue d)

size sample

Total

total) Column

j total)(

Row

i(

e

th th

ij 

4

14 300

) 36 )(

120

(

e 11  

Example:

Trang 22

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Trang 23

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

The Chi-Square Test Statistic

 where:

o ij = observed frequency in cell (i, j)

e ij = expected frequency in cell (i, j)

c

1

2 ij ij

2

e

) e o

(

The Chi-square contingency test statistic is:

) 1 c )(

1 r ( d

Trang 24

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

0 4

158

) 4 158 156

( 6

21

) 6 21 24

( 6

105

) 6 105 108

( 4

14

) 4 14 12

Trang 25

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Contingency Analysis

2

 2 05 = 3.841

Reject H 0

 = 0.05

Decision Rule:

If  2 > 3.841, reject H 0 , otherwise, do not reject H 0

1 (1)(1)

1) - 1)(c -

(r d.f.

with 6848

0

Trang 26

Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2010

Prentice-Chapter Summary

 Used the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to

determine whether data fits a specified distribution

 Example of a discrete distribution (uniform)

 Example of a continuous distribution (normal)

 Used contingency tables to perform a chi-square test of independence

 Compared observed cell frequencies to expected cell frequencies

Ngày đăng: 17/09/2020, 15:00