1. Trang chủ
  2. » Nông - Lâm - Ngư

Effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) practices on nutrients uptake by safflower and nutrients status in vertisol soil

6 24 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 6
Dung lượng 157,85 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Annigeri, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during rabi season of 2015-16 under rainfed condition to study the effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) practices on nutrients uptake by safflower and nutrients status in Vertisol Soil in safflower crop.

Trang 1

Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.062

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices on Nutrients

Uptake by Safflower and Nutrients status in Vertisol Soil Ripan Chandra Das 1 *, G Somanagouda 2 and Bheiru Singh 1

1

Research Fellow, Department of Agronomy, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka-580005, India 2

Department of Agronomy, ARS, Annigari, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka-580005, India

*Corresponding author

A B S T R A C T

Introduction

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is one of

the oldest crops cultivated for its edible seed

oil and is known for drought tolerance due to

its partially xerophytic, spiny nature and deep

root system As this crop is mainly cultivated

under rainfed conditions during post-rainy

season on receding soil moisture, inadequate

supply of both water and nutrients affect

nutrient uptake

Application of limited quantity of nutrients

(NPK) only through chemical fertilizer

creates multiple-nutrients deficiencies in the

soil which is considered as one of reason for

limiting the crop production (Tiwari et al.,

2002) Hence, there is need to be improved the soil fertility for better yield Thus, soil fertility as well as crop production can be improved by application of nutrients through organic sources and/or integration of different organic sources of nutrients (Reddy 2005,

Akbari et al., 2011; Basak et al., 2012)

Nutrients are very much essential for growth and development of safflower and these deficiency leads to decrease the crop yield Therefore, it is necessary to know the uptake

of nutrients by crop and nutrients status in vertisol soil Thus, this research was conducted with the objective of to study the effect of integrated nutrient management

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 4 (2017) pp 512-522

Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Annigeri,

University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during rabi season of 2015-16

under rainfed condition to study the effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) practices on nutrients uptake by safflower and nutrients status in Vertisol

Soil in safflower crop Results indicated that among the different INM

combinations tested, application of RDF (40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) + 2.0 t ha-1

Vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 10.0 kg ha-1 (T 10 ) recorded significantly highest nutrient content and uptake of nitrogen (33.75 and 36.70 Kg

ha-1) phosphorus (8.72 and 15.67 Kg ha-1) and potassium (20.72 and 34.97 Kg ha-1)

at 60 DAS and at harvest respectively The available nutrients content of N, P 2 O 5

and K 2 O in soil at harvest were also recorded significantly higher in treatment T 10

(application of RDF (40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) + 2.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 10.0 kg ha-1)

K e y w o r d s

Safflower,

Integrated nutrient

management,

Nutrient uptake

and soil status,

Vermicompost,

Azospirillum and

PSB

Accepted:

06 March 2017

Available Online:

10 April 2017

Article Info

Trang 2

(INM) practices on nutrients uptake by

safflower and nutrients status in vertisol soil

Materials and Methods

A field experiment was conducted at the

Agricultural Research Station, Annigeri,

University of Agricultural Sciences,

Dharwad, during rabi season of 2015-16 The

experiment was laid out in a randomized

complete block design (RCBD) with three

replications and ten treatments comprising, T1

- RDF (40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) + FYM (5.0 t

ha-1), T2 - RDF (40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) alone,

T3 - 50% RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB, T4 - RDF + 1.0 t ha-1

Vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB, T5 -

50% RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB, T6 - RDF + 2.0 t ha-1

Vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB, T7 -

50% RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4 10.0 kg ha-1 T8 -

RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 10.0 kg ha-1,

T9 - 50% RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 10.0 kg ha-1

and T10- RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 10.0 kg ha-1

The soil of the experimental field was clayey

in texture and soil in low, low and high rating

for available nitrogen (224 kg N ha-1) (Kjeldal

method), available phosphorus (20.86 kg P2O5

ha-1) (Olesen’s method) and available

potassium (342 kg K2O ha-1) (Flame

photometric method), respectively The soil

was found slightly alkaline (pH 7.95)

(Potentiometric method) with normal electric

conductivity Urea, single super phosphate,

muriate of potash and zinc sulphate as

chemical sources of nutrients, and FYM,

Vermicompost, Azospirillum, and PSB as

organic and biofertilizer sources were used in

different combinations to make 10 treatments

as mentioned above The chemical fertilizers

were applied as basal at the time of sowing

and for seed treatment the seeds of safflower

were coated with Azospirillum and PSB one

hour before sowing and they were air dried under shade whereas the organic manures were applied three weeks before sowing of safflower Safflower variety- Annigeri-1 was sown in the second week of October and harvested in the third week of February Rainfall received during 2015-16 was 507.20

mm which was 67.24 % lower than the long-term average of 754.90 mm During the crop growth period from October to February only

38 mm rainfall received in October month at the time of sowing Further, no rainfall was received during the crop growth period

Estimation of N, P and K uptake by crop

To estimate the uptake of N, P and K, samples were collected 60 DAS and at harvest for weeds and only at harvest for crop The samples were oven dried at 650 C and ground

in Willey mill to pass through two mm sieve The two mm sieved samples were used for the estimation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in crop and weeds

Nitrogen uptake by crop and weeds were determined by digesting the plant samples with suitable acid mixture of concentrated sulphuric acid The digested samples were distilled by Micro Kjeldahl method in an alkaline condition and titrated against standard acid Piper (2002) Phosphorus was estimated by Vanedomolybdate method in diacid mixture as detailed by Jackson (1973) The intensity of the colour developed was measured in a spectrophotometer, using blue filter Potassium content was estimated from

Photometer as described by Muhr et al.,

(1965) and was expressed as percentage K The nutrient content and dry weight were used to calculate the total uptake of nutrients (N P K) and expressed in kg ha-1

Trang 3

Nutrient uptake (kg ha-1) =

Nutrient content (%)

X Dry weight (kg ha-1)

100

The soil samples were collected (0-30 cm

depth) after harvest of safflower from each

plot and analysed for available N 0.32%

method), available P2O5 0.5 M NaHCO3

extractable at pH 8.5 (Olesen’s method) and

K2O Neutral normal ammonium acetate

extractable (Flame photometric method)

Results and Discussion

Nutrients (NPK) uptake by crop

Nutrient (N, P and K) uptake by crop varied

significantly among various nutrients

management treatments at 60 DAS and at

harvest (Table 1)

Results indicated that among the different

INM combinations tested, application of RDF

(40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) + 2.0 t ha-1

Vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB +

ZnSO4@ 10.0 kg ha-1 (T10) recorded

significantly highest nutrient content and

uptake of nitrogen (33.75 and 36.70 Kg ha-1)

phosphorus (8.72 and 15.67 Kg ha-1) and

potassium (20.72 and 34.97 Kg ha-1) at 60

DAS and at harvest respectively, but

integrated nutrients management treatments

T6, T7, T8 and T9 found to be at par with T10.

Significantly higher uptake of nitrogen,

phosphorus and potassium by safflower in

these treatments might be due to integrated

source of nutrients helped in better

translocation of nitrogen, phosphorus and

potassium from soil to plant and its release

from organic amendments over a longer

period of time

Thus, direct as well as residual effect of manures and chemical fertilizer helped in uptake of nutrients The results are in

conformity with findings of Bharadwaj et al., (2008) and Raju et al., (2013) In addition to

above, Vermicompost also may be enhanced soil moisture retention and its supply during the crop growth, which in turn improved nutrient uptake by the crop

Nutrients (NPK) status in soil

The soil available N, P2O5 and K2O were significantly influenced due to different integrated treatments after harvesting of safflower are presented in Table 2 Results indicated that among the different INM combinations tested, application of RDF (40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) + 2.0 t ha-1

Vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB +

ZnSO4@ 10.0 kg ha-1 (T10) recorded significantly highest values of soil available N (229.60 kg ha-1), P2O5 (25.29 kg ha-1) and

K2O (320.42 kg ha-1), but integrated nutrients management treatments T6, T7, T8 and T9

found to be at par with T10 Similar beneficial effects of organic sources as well as integration of different sources of nutrients on

soil fertility were also recorded by Akbari et

al., (2011), Basak et al., (2012) and Tamboli

et al., (2014)

Conclusion based on results of the field experimentation, its seems logical to conclude that profitable, potential and effective nutrient management in safflower by integrated

nutrients management practices can be

achieved by application of RDF (40:40:12 kg

ha-1 NPK) + 2.0 t ha-1 Vermicompost +

Azospirillum + PSB + ZnSO4@ 10.0 kg ha-1

Trang 4

Table.1 Nitrogen, phosphorus and potash content (%) and uptake (kg ha-1) by safflower as influenced by INM treatments

Treatment

Nutrient content (%) Uptake (kg ha -1 ) Nutrient content (%) Uptake (kg ha -1 )

T

1 - RDF (40:40:12 kg ha-1 NPK) + FYM (5.0 t

ha-1)

T

T

3 - 50 % RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum +

PSB

T

4 - RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum + PSB 0.59 0.11 0.39 21.37 4.00 14.07 0.72 0.26 0.68 25.94 9.52 24.67 T

5 - 50 % RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum +

PSB

T

6 - RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum + PSB 0.69 0.15 0.43 27.35 5.87 17.08 0.79 0.32 0.75 31.38 12.63 29.61 T

7 - 50 % RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum +

PSB + ZnSO4 10.0 kg ha-1

T

8 - RDF + 1.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum + PSB

+ ZnSO4 10.0 kg ha-1

T

9 - 50 % RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum +

PSB + ZnSO4 10.0 kg ha-1

T

10 - RDF + 2.0 t ha-1 VC + Azospirillum + PSB

+ ZnSO4 10.0 kg ha-1

Trang 5

Table.2 Effect of INM on available nutrient (N, P2O5 and K2O) as influenced by different

treatments at harvest of safflower

Treatments Available N (kg/ha) Available P 2 O 5

(kg/ha)

Available K 2 O (kg/ha)

References

Akbari, K N., Kanzaria, K K., Vora, V D.,

Sutenia, G S., Padmina, D R 2011

Nutrient management practices for

sustaining groundnut yield and soil

Productivity on sandy loam soil J of

Indian Society Soil Sci., 59: 308-311

Basak, B B., Biswas, D R., Rattan, R K

2012 Comparative effectiveness of

productivity, soil mineral nitrogen and

soil organic carbon pools under

Inceptisol J of Indian Society Soil

Sci., 60(4): 288-298

Bharadwaj, V., Omanwar, P K., Bansal, S K

2008 Effect of integrated nutrient

management practices under long term

fertilizer management system J of

Indian Society Soil Sci., 30: 99

Jackson, M L 1973 Soil Chemical Analysis,

Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd., New Delhi

Shankarambramoney, R., Lelley, V R., Donahue, R L 1965 Soil Testing

in India USAID, New Delhi, 47-77

Piper, C S 2002 Soil and Plant Analysis,

Hans Publ Bombay, India

Raju, B., Chandrasekhar, R P., Reddy, A P

K., Padmavathi, P 2013 Effect of Various INM Practices on Yield, Urease and Dehydrogenase activity in

Safflower.Helix 6: 405-408

Reddy, S S 2005 Effect of different organic

manures on available NPK status and organic Carbon after harvest of

groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Crop Res., 30(1): 26-29

Tamboli, B D., Bagwan, I R., Pawar, A B.,

Indi, D V., Bhakare, B D., Shelke, S

Trang 6

R., Kadam, J R 2014 Integrated

nutrient management in non-spiny

safflower on inceptisol under dryland

condition Indian J Agric Res., 29(2):

66-70

Tiwari, A., Dwivedi, A K., Dikshit, P R

2002 Long term influence of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil fertility and productivity of

soybean-wheat system in vertisols J of Indian

Society Soil Sci., 50(4): 472-475

How to cite this article:

Ripan Chandra Das, G Somanagouda and Bheiru Singh 2017 Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices on Nutrients Uptake by Safflower and Nutrients status in Vertisol

Soil Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci 6(4): 512-522

doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.062

Ngày đăng: 02/07/2020, 23:53

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm