VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES ***************** NGUYỄN THỊ THỦY AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USE OF GROU
Trang 1VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES
*****************
NGUYỄN THỊ THỦY
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USE OF GROUP WORK TO TEACH SPEAKING TO LARGE ENGLISH CLASSES AT A
POLICE UNIVERSITY IN VIETNAM
Nghiên cứu việc sử dụng phương pháp làm việc nhóm để dạy nói cho các lớp học tiếng Anh đông người ở một trường đại học ở Việt Nam)
M.A MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS
Field: English Teaching Methodology Code: 60140111
Hanoi 2014
Trang 2VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES
*****************
NGUYỄN THỊ THỦY
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USE OF GROUP WORK TO TEACH SPEAKING TO LARGE ENGLISH CLASSES AT A
POLICE UNIVERSITY IN VIETNAM
Nghiên cứu việc sử dụng phương pháp làm việc nhóm để dạy nói cho các lớp học tiếng Anh đông người ở một trường đại học ở Việt Nam)
M.A MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS
Field: English Teaching Methodology Code: 60140111
Supervisor: Dr Hoàng Thị Hạnh
Hanoi 2014
Trang 3i
DECLARATION
I, NGUYEN THI THUY, hereby certify that the thesis entitled “An investigation
into the use of group work to teach speaking skills to large English classes at a police university in Vietnam” is my own study in the fulfillment of the requirement
for the Degree of Master of Arts at Faculty of Post-Graduate Studies, University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Hanoi 2014
Nguyen Thi Thuy
Trang 4ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to acknowledge the assistance I received from a number of people in the course of carrying out the research paper I highly treasure the important role they played in making the completion of this minor thesis a success
First of all, I am deeply indebted to my supervisor, Dr Hoang Thi Hanh for painstakingly reading through my work from the beginning to the end and for her constant advice and invaluable comments and suggestions Without her continuous support I may not have come this far
Secondly, I want to express our sincere gratitude to the Post-Graduate lecturers who supplied me with basic and useful knowledge about how I could structure a research project and what I should write in each chapter
Thirdly, I would like to extend my thanks to my colleagues and my students at the People’s Police University of Technology and Logistics for their willingness to help
me complete my thesis
Finally, millions of thanks go to our beloved family whose financial support and spiritual encouragement contribute a significant part to the completion of the research
Trang 5iii
ABSTRACT
This study attempted to investigate the effects of group work on students’ participation in English speaking lessons Students’ attitudes towards the use of group work were identified To achieve these objectives, 36 second-year students of
a police university were involved The data were obtained through the analysis of students’ journals; notes from the researcher and group secretaries; and interviews with students and teachers before the treatment as well as an observing teacher after the treatment The findings show students’ positive attitude towards group work, which results in a significant increase in students’ speaking participation The results obtained indicate some improvements in students’ speaking Pedagogical implications drawn from the findings and suggestions for the further cycle in the action research are presented
Trang 6iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Declaration i
Acknowledgements ii
Abstract iii
Table of contents iv
PART A: INTRODUCTION 1 Rationale for the research 1
2 Objectives of the study 1
3 Research questions 2
4 Significance of the study 2
5 Scope of the study 3
6 Method of the study……… 3
7 The presentation of the study……… 4
PART B: DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1 Theoretical background of speaking 5
1.1.1 Nature of speaking skill 5
1.1.2 Teaching Speaking skill 6
1.1.3 Classroom speaking activities 7
1.1.4 Problems with speaking activities 9
1.2 Overview of group work 10
1.2.1 Definition of group work 10
1.2.2 Benefits of group work 11
1.2.3 The implementation of group work in the classroom 12
1.3 Review of the related studies 15
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY 2.1 Why action research? 18
2.2 Research setting 18
2.2.1 Overview 18
Trang 7v
2.2.2 Description of the English course 19
2.2.3 Participants 19
2.3 The Research Design 20
2.4 The procedure of the study 20
CHAPTER 3: DATA ANALYSIS 3.1 Students’ journals 26
3.2 Teachers’ notes and secretaries’ notes 30
3.3 The post-treatment interview with the observing teacher 31
3.4 Some newly-arising problems and solutions for the next cycle 34
PART C: CONCLUSION 1 Summary of the study 36
2 Pedagogical implications 37
3 Limitations of the study and suggestions for further studies 37
REFERENCES 39 APPENDICES I
Trang 81
PART A: INTRODUCTION
1 Rationale for the research
With my own experiences of an English teacher, I see that speaking is a problem for most of non-majored English students My students are not an exception Before entering their universities, they mainly come from rural areas, so they did not have a lot
of chances to practice English in communication or for interaction in their daily life During the speaking lessons, the students seem to rather quiet and passive Whenever I ask them to say something in English, they just say “yes” or “no” and hardly answer the open questions like “Why …?”, “What do you think…?”, etc As a result, teacher talking time was much greater than student talking time in class The speaking period seems to be boring and stressful not only to the students but to me as well Besides, I encountered quite a few problems in terms of a large number of students in my English classes In speaking lessons, I cannot control and check individuals’ speaking performance Speaking opportunities for each student become limited Most of students do not have any contributions to their speaking, whereas only few students take part in speaking activities
In order to overcome these obstacles and make my speaking lessons more interesting, I tried to search and read some studies to find some solutions to my problems One of the strategies that reflect the principle of learner - centeredness is group work This method was applied widely in some classrooms and showed some positive effects on students’ speaking However, when group work is used in my own context, I do not know whether it is appropriate and helpful to my students or not
Therefore, it is necessary for me to do a small action research on “the use of group work to teach speaking skills to large English classes at a police university.”
Trang 92
2 Objectives of the study
With the attempts to find out the extent which the use of group work can help
my students enhance their speaking skills and also know how my students perceive this learning technique Specifically, this study is carried out with two main objectives as following:
- To investigate the effects of group work on students’ participation in English speaking lessons
- To examine students’ attitudes towards the use of group work in the classroom
3 Research questions
In order to achieve the set goals in the previous section, the research seeks to answer the following research questions:
1 How does the use of group work influence students’ speaking?
2 What are students’ attitudes towards the use of group work in English speaking lessons?
4 The significance of the study
After finding out the impacts of group work in oral performance, this study is hoped to be valuable to both teachers and students at my university
Firstly, it helps me to understand whether the use of group work increases students’ participations in speaking activities or not Moreover, this research is also expected to raise the teachers’ awareness of students’ motivation in language learning
in general, and in speaking in particular From these findings, it will be useful for my colleagues to select the suitable methods in their future lesson planning
Trang 103
Besides, for my students, they may have one more chance to practice their speaking skills in another way in comparison to previous methods Their teacher’s transformation in group work implementation will be able to be beneficial to the students
5 The scope of the study
This study mainly focuses on the impacts of group work on students’ speaking
in English lessons Besides, their attitudes towards the use of group work in speaking activities are also one of the concerns of the study
The participants in this study are 36 second year non English-majored students
at my university
6 Method of the study
In consideration of the research’s purposes, this study employs three data collection instruments including interviews with teachers and students; students’ journals; notes from the researcher and the groups’ secretaries
The interview with students and teachers: this instrument is employed to find
out the problems students encountered in previous speaking lessons
Students’ journals: These journals are collected at the end of each lesson during
the experiment to investigate what students like and dislike about the use of group work in speaking lessons
The interview with the observing teacher: This method is carried out to
investigate her opinions about the use of group work to teach speaking skills and its appropriateness after she observed some speaking lessons in the process of experiment
Trang 114
The notes from the researcher and the groups’ secretaries: These notes are
collected to identify whether there is any progress or not after the actions
7 The presentation of the study
This study is organized in three main parts Part A is the INTRODUCTION which presents the rationales, the objectives, the research questions, the significance, the scope, the methods and the presentation of the study Part B is the DEVELOPMENT of the research including in three chapters The first chapter reviews the literature relating to the use of group work to teach speaking The second chapter describes the situation where the research was conducted and the informants involved in the research It also includes the description of English course, research design, the teaching cycle in the study The method of data collection and its procedures The third chapter comes up with the results of the effects of group work on students’ speaking performance and students’ attitudes towards group work Part C is the CONCLUSIONwhich includes the major findings, their implications and plan for the next research cycle
Trang 125
PART B : DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW This study investigates the use of group work (GW) to teach speaking skills It aims at finding out how this implementation influence on students’ speaking and what their attitudes towards this method are This chapter reviews the literature on theoretical background of speaking including nature of speaking skill, teaching speaking skill, classroom speaking activities, problems with speaking activities In addition, some theories about GW such as the definition of GW, benefits of GW, some problems and suggested solutions in using GW, the implementation of GW in the class room are also addressed in this chapter Besides, some reviews of related studies are mentioned at the end of the chapter
1.1 Theoretical background of speaking
1.1.1 Nature of speaking skill
In the process of teaching and learning English, speaking skill plays an important role in mastering this language Therefore, there are many different studies about this field Each scholar has their own views about it Nunan (1991, p.40) says that “speaking is the same as oral interaction which are conventional ways of speaking information, expressing our idea, and thought in our mind Sharing the same opinion, speaking can be considered to be “an interactive process of constructing meaning that involves producing and receiving and processing information” (Brown, 1994b; Burns
& Joyce, 1997) These definitions can be understood that the interaction of learners is the vital factor in speaking activities
Moreover, Brown (1994b) affirms that interaction is the heart of communication; it is what communication is all about, for example in the cases of
Trang 136
sending messages; receiving them; interpreting them in a context; negotiating meanings; and collaborating to accomplish certain purposes And interaction is the collaborative exchange of thoughts, feelings, or ideas between two or more people resulting in a reciprocal effect on each other
In another way, Chaney and Burk (1998, p.13) argues that speaking is "the process of building and sharing meaning through the use of verbal and non-verbal symbols, in a variety of contexts" This definition mainly covers some factors related to different ways of exchanging information in different communicative contexts Therefore, in speaking process, learners are also required to know not only how to produce specific points of language such as grammar, pronunciation, or vocabulary but also when, why and in what ways language is produced
Besides, Gower et al.(1995, pp.99-100) state the two main aspects of the speaking skill including “accuracy” and “fluency” It is said that accuracy involves the
correct use of vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation and describe fluency as “the ability to keep going when speaking spontaneously”
From some definitions above I choose to refer to speaking in this thesis as the process of exchange opinions, ideas, thoughts, and feelings between two or more learners to support with each other on the basis of their cooperation
1.1.2 Teaching Speaking skill
It is undeniable that the speaking ability is a good source of motivation for most students because of its significance in their life Therefore they view learning the language as learning how to speak the language According to Nunan (1991), success is measured in terms of the ability to carry out a conversation in the target language
Trang 147
Today's world requires that the goal of teaching speaking should improve students' communicative skills, because, only in that way, students can express themselves and learn how to follow the social and cultural rules appropriate in each communicative circumstance The arrival of communicative language teaching (CLT)
in the late 1960s can be one of some choices for this goal CLT is based on real-life situations that require communication By using this method in ESL classes, students will have the opportunity of communicating with each other in the target language (Kayi, 2006) Byrne (1981, p.71) shows that the communicative approach allows many interactive oral activities in the classroom Learners participate in group work (including of more than two students), play their own roles to speak to others, who have the same role Learners are introduced to clear targets by their teacher and teachers may create communicative conditions, go round, and participate in the activities to help their students
Nunan (1989, p.94) also points out the approach which consists of aspects common to some definitions of CLT: CLT review language as a system for the expression of meaning Activities involve oral communication, carrying out meaning tasks and using language, which is meaningful to the learners Objectives reflect the needs of the learners They consist of functional skills as well as linguistic objectives The learners' role is as a negotiator and integrator The teacher' role is as a facilitator of the communication process
1.1.3 Classroom speaking activities
Speaking skills should be taught in attractive and interesting activities Many researchers discuss classroom activities and a lot of activities are designed based on the theory and characteristics of CLT
Trang 158
Harmer (2001, pp.348-352) mentions six classroom speaking activities They are acting from script, communication games, discussion, prepared talks, questionnaires, simulation, and role play Richards and Rodgers (1986, p.165) state that the range of exercise types and activities with a communicative approach is unlimited, provided that such exercises and activities enable learners to attain the communicative objectives of the curriculum, engage learners in communication and require the use of such communicative processes as information sharing, negotiation of meaning, and interaction Gagne (1985) indicates that students’ motivation to participate in activities
is one of important types of motivation, it is essential to consider what kind of activities can enhance students’ motivation on learning language At the same time, Lawtie (2004, p.1) also strongly believes in the important role of the right activities in speaking class when arguing that “if the right activities are taught in the right way, speaking in class can be a lot of fun, raising general learner motivation and making the English language classroom a fun and dynamic place to be”
In order to clarify that communicative activities are effective and motivating, Ur (1996, p.120) lists out some necessary characteristics of them First, “learners talk a lot” which means as much as possible of period of time allotted to the activity is in fact occupied by learners’ talk Second, “participation is even” In other words, classroom discussion is not dominated by a minority of talkative students: all get a chance to speak, and contributions are evenly distributed Next, “motivation is high” which can
be understood that learners are eager to speak because they are interested in the topics and have something new to say about it, or because they want to contribute to achieving a task objective Finally, “language is of an acceptable level”
From the theories on speaking activities above, it can be inferred that it is necessary to adopt appropriate speaking activities which can help learners develop
Trang 169
speaking skill As a result, the teacher can help students practice what they have learnt, find ways to achieve communicative objectives
1.1.4 Problems with speaking activities
According to Ur (1996, p.121), teachers often come across the following problems The first is “inhibition” Unlike reading, writing and listening activities, speaking requires some degree of real-time exposure to an audience Learners are often inhabited about trying to say something in a foreign language in the classroom because they are worried about making mistakes, fearful of criticism or losing face, or simply shy of the attention that their speech attracts
Having nothing to say is the second problem Teachers often hear learners complain they can not think of anything to say They may have no motivation to express themselves beyond the guilty feeling that they should be speaking The problem is also mentioned by Lawtie (2004) and it is necessary to be tackled
Moreover, uneven or low participation is among the teachers’ obstacles Only one participant can talk at a time if he or she is to be heard In a large group, this means that each one has only very little time for talking This problem is compounded by the tendency of some learners to dominate the group, while the others speak very little or not at all
Last but not least, mother-tongue use is also problematic When all, or a number of the learners share the same mother tongue, they may tend to use it This happens because it is easier, because it is unnatural to speak to one another in a foreign language and because or because learners feel less ‘exposed’ if they are speaking their mother tongue Lawtie (2003, p.2) also states that the problem would happen if the task
or activity is not “pitched at the right level for the students” If the language is pitched
Trang 17In a word, overcoming these obstacles in speaking class to create successful speaking activities where learners talk a lot, participation is even and motivation is high certainly requires a lot of teachers’ efforts in designing and carrying out speaking activities
1.2 Group work
1.2.1 Definition of group work
Based on research purposes, each researcher has their own definition Here are some definitions about group work
Doff (1988, p.137) defines group work as a process that “the teacher divides the class into small groups to work together (usually four or five students in each group), all the groups work at the same time.”
In addition, group work is defined by Johnson and Smith (1991, p.15) as "group work, in language class, is a co- operative activity, during which students share aims and responsibilities to complete a task assigned by the teacher in groups or in pairs"
According to Richards (1983, p.189), group work is an essential activity because the kind of interactions produced in group activities has been shown to be
Trang 181.2.2 Benefits of group work
There have been some authors which showed their positive opinions about the use of group work in language learning Here are some main benefits
Firstly, students' responsibility and autonomy are promoted through group work activities All students work together, share their ideas, and always want to reach the goal in group activities In addition, one of their main tasks is being in charge of their group activities Every learner is in charge of his own and each others' speaking According to Doff (1998) group work and pair work encourage students to share ideas knowledge such as “in a reading activity, students can help each other to explore the meaning of a text, in a discussion activity; students can give each other new ideas" Brown (2001) also states that the whole-class activities often give students a lot of time
to relax even in a small class of fifteen or twenty students but when they participate in group work, group members’ responsibilities become equal
Secondly, learners' participation, talking time and oral fluency are improved through group As for Ur (1996, p.232), students can have a learning task during small interaction in group work and it is considered as a kind of their activation and is very valuable for practicing of fluency in speaking There are five groups in a class; students can get five times as some chance to speak as in a big class
Trang 1912
Thirdly, the students' motivation is improved through group work activities Group-work activity can allow participants to use the language Moreover, it is one of the most effective ways to motivate participants to become more involved Richards and Loc Khart (1994) point out that, students not only play more active roles in the learning process but also get the benefits of sharing ideas with their team member through taking part in groups Doff (1988, p.141) states " students feel less anxiety when they are privately than when they are on shown in front of the whole class Pair work and group-work can help shy students, who would never say anything in a whole class activity"
In general, group work offers many chances for co-operation, through which students share responsibilities, support each other, learn to negotiate and listen to different opinions They feel equal to participate in group work and confident to share their ideas However, group activities still have got many problems when some students control the group a lot and make others uncomfortable, so how to organize group work effectively is the big question for educators and language teachers
1.2.3 The implementation of group work in the classroom
It is clear that effective group work in the classroom does not occur automatically Therefore, group work requires teachers’ careful preparation so that their implementation can be successful According to Brown (2001), if group work is not carefully planned, well executed, monitored thoroughly and followed up on in some ways, it can go wrong The following are practical steps suggested by him to take
to carry out successful group work in the classroom
1.2.3.1 The selection of appropriate group techniques
The first step in promoting successful group work is to select an appropriate task Typical group tasks are defined and briefly characterized by Brown (2001) as
Trang 2013
follows The first task is game A game could be any activities that formalize a
technique into units that can be score in some way Guessing games are common
language classroom activities The second one is role-play which minimally involves
giving a role to one or more members of a group and assigning an objective or purpose that participants must accomplish A group role-play might involve a discussion of a political issue, with each person assigned to represent a particular political point of
view The third one is drama which is a more formalized form of role-play, with a
pre-planned story line and script Sometimes small groups may prepare their own short dramatization of some event, writing the script and rehearsing the scene as a group
The fourth one is projects Mainly for young learners who can greatly benefit from
hands-on approaches to language, certain projects can be rewarding indeed The fifth
one is interview It is a popular activity for pair work, but also suitable for group work, interviews are useful at all level of proficiency The sixth is brainstorming which is
often put to excellent use in preparing students to discuss a complex issue It is a technique whose purpose is to initiate some sort of thinking process Brainstorming involves students in a rapid-fire, free-association listing of concepts or ideas or facts or
feelings relevant to some topic or context The seventh is information gap This
technique is one of the easiest and most interesting forms of communicative activity in the speaking lesson Information-gap activities include a tremendous variety of techniques in which the objectives is to convey or to request information The information that students seek can range from simple to complex The eighth is
opinion exchange which is a difficult technique for students to deal with at the
beginning levels of proficiency, but by the intermediate level, certain techniques can effectively include the exchange of various opinions Sometimes, opinions are
appropriate; sometimes they are not The last ones are problem solving and decision making Problem-solving is also popular in speaking lesson of major students
Problem-solving group techniques focus on the group’s solution of a specified
Trang 2114
problem The problem might be relatively simple (such as giving directions on a map), moderately complex (such as working out an itinerary from train, plane, and bus schedules), or quite complex (such as solving a mystery in a “crime story”) Decision-making techniques are simply one kind of problem-solving where the ultimate goal is for students to make a decision
In this thesis, role-play and decision making are used in three speaking lessons because of some reasons First, they are appropriate to the given requirements of three activities in the lifeline pre-intermediate) including role-play a conversation about ordering a meal (unit 8), role-play a conversation about making reservation with the given information (unit 9), make suggestions for the given situations (unit 10) Second, these are simple tasks which are popular in speaking lessons of non-major English students
1.2.3.2 Group work planning
According to Brown (2001), after we have selected an appropriate type of activity, our group work planning should include the following seven rules for
implementing a group technique The first rule is to introduce the technique
According to Brown (2001), the introduction of the technique may simply be a brief explanation but it can decide the success of group work’s results The introduction should always include a statement of the ultimate purpose so that students can apply all
other directions to that objective The second one is to justify the use of small groups for the technique Sometimes many students are reluctant to participate in group work,
they do not understand why group work is used for this task Therefore, in cases of necessity, the teachers tell them explicitly why the small group is important for accomplishing the task At the same time, the teacher remind them that they will get an opportunity to practice certain language forms or functions, and that if they are not
Trang 2215
willing to speak up in front of the whole class, it is their chance to do so in the security
of a small group The third one is to model the technique It may be not necessary to
model simple techniques or the techniques that students have done before But for a new and complex task, it may be useful to make sure students know what they are
supposed to do The fourth one is to give explicit detailed instructions When students
have understood the purpose of the task and how their discussion might proceed, teacher will give them specific instructions on what they are to do They include: a restatement of the purpose, rules they are to follow, a time frame (time needed to
complete the task), assignment of roles to students The fifth is to divide the class into groups There are many ways to divide the class into groups If teachers want to ensure
participation and control, they can pre-assign groups in order to account for one or two
of the following: proficiency levels; age or gender differences; personality types; cognitive preferences; interests; prior learning experience; target language goals The
sixth is to check for clarification Before students start moving into their groups, the
teacher can check whether students all understand their assignment by asking some of them to restate the purpose of this activity
Referring to the study, I implemented these above rules in the training session in order to make sure my student know what they will do in the experiment lessons These are described specifically in the procedure of the study
1.3 Review of the related studies
The use of group work in speaking lesson has been mentioned in many studies Each researcher has their own ideas but sometimes to some extent they also have common things
There have been a few researches on the process of implementing group work in speaking lessons (Thuy, 2008; Rob Watkins, 2005) Thuy (2008) investigated the
Trang 2316
procedures of organizing group work activity in the speaking lesson of 1st-year major students She identified strategies used by teachers to stimulate students’ use of English
in group work and the factors bringing about difficulties for the teachers and students
in their application of group work Rob Watkins (2005) suggested that the effectiveness
of group work depends on the types of motivation the teacher use in the class and the way they design group work activity
These studies have touched upon a domain which has been much concerned lately: the implementation process of group work However, these studies have have not made clear about interaction process in group work, learner-learner interaction during small group activity, strategies to involve students in group work activity Moreover, these studies have mainly focused on the process of group work implementation in speaking lesson of English-majored students
Besides, a number of other studies have found that group work helps develop students’ speaking ability and increase the effectiveness of a speaking lesson Linh (2008) found that when applying group work activities in speaking lesson, majority of the students are interested in discussion Through group work, students have opportunities to help each other as well as exchange experience to find a good way to improve on their own communication problems After doing an action research, Thuy (2010) indicated that the use of group work had good effect on students’ participation, for instance, student-initiated interactions increased and contributions by students who were shy increased Donough (2004) also reports clear positive effects that small group activities had on improvement of production of the target forms Adams (1976) and Castanos (1985) found out that students not only talked more, but also used a wider range of speech acts in the small group work context
Trang 2417
The studies mentioned above have firmly asserted the important roles of group work activities in improving learners’ speaking skill Firstly, group work helped to increase students’ participation in communicative activities in large classes (Thuy, 2010) Secondly, group work maximized the opportunities for students to communicate and exchange the information with each other, (Linh, 2008) In addition, learner-learner interaction through group work activities was useful for practicing oral communication skills (McDonough, 2004)
In general, in these studies, the use of group work brings many benefits to students in speaking lessons However, I do not know whether these findings are worked well in my own context Therefore, I would like to do this thesis to investigate how the implementation of group work affects students’ speaking
Trang 2518
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY This chapter gives a thorough description of how the research was carried out The first part is the description of the research setting and the participants involved in the research The teaching cycle implemented in the program will be given in the second part The next part concerns the research methods employed to collect data for the study The data collection procedure is followed The details are going to be presented as follows
2.1 Why action research?
This action research was carried out in an attempt to find out solutions to the improvement of my students’ speaking skill It was carried out by myself - a teacher-researcher- with my own students in an intact class For these reasons, I believed an action research design would fit well my purpose
2.2 Research setting
2.2.1 Overview
I have been working as a teacher of English at my university for four years There are fourteen teachers aged from 25 to 47 in my English Department All the English teachers are graduates from different institutions in Vietnam such as Vietnam National University, Hanoi University, The People’s Security Academy, Hanoi University of Technology Like students of other colleges and universities, all students have to pass a very challenging University Entrance Examination with other subjects except for English My students come from all parts of the country: big cities, provinces and mountainous areas They do not have the same level of English language proficiency Some of them have learned English for 11 years, some have learned English for seven years and some others have learned English for three years In terms