This paper presents an experimental research to analyze the influence of air gaps on the strength and behavior of PC produced by FDM through tensile and compressive tests in directions of bonding. A change in air gap was evident to cause a modification of the material resulting in changes of the strength and behavior of the model.
Trang 1INFLUENCE OF AIR GAPS ON THE STRENGTH AND BEHAVIOR OF
POLYCARBONATE IN FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING
Phan Quang The *
University of Technology - TNU
ABSTRACT
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is widely applied in producing thermoplastic parts of complicated geometry and very effective in small lots It is well understood that the strength of the product is determined by the strength of the bonding in layer and between layers This paper presents an experimental research to analyze the influence of air gaps on the strength and behavior
of PC produced by FDM through tensile and compressive tests in directions of bonding A change
in air gap was evident to cause a modification of the material resulting in changes of the strength and behavior of the model
Keywords: FDM, auto adhesion, polycarbonate behavior, uniaxial tests.
Received: 22/10/2018; Revised: 12/11/2018; Approved: 28/12/2018
SỰ ẢNH HƯỞNG CỦA KHE HỞ ĐƯỜNG IN ĐẾN ĐỘ BỀN VÀ ĐẶC TÍNH
CƠ HỌC CỦA POLYCARBONATE TRONG IN 3D- FDM
Phan Quang Thế
Trường Đại học Kỹ thuật Công nghiệp - ĐH Thái Nguyên
TÓM TẮT
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) là một dạng của in 3D được ứng dụng rộng rãi trong chế tạo các chi tiết nhựa nhiệt có hình dáng phức tạp, rất hiệu quả với sản xuất đơn chiếc Độ bền của chi tiết được quyết định bởi độ bền liên kết của các sợi trong cùng một lớp và giữa các lớp Bài báo này trình bày một nghiên cứu thực nghiệm nhằm phân tích ảnh hưởng của khoảng cách giữa các sợi in đến độ bền và đặc tính của PC trong in 3D thông qua thí nghiệm kéo và nén theo phương liên kết giữa các sợi in Sự thay đổi của khoảng cách giữa các sợi in là nguyên nhân gây ra sự thay đổi cấu trúc dẫn tới thay đổi độ bền và đặc tính của sản phẩm in
Từ khóa: In 3D, FDM, sự bám dính, đặc tính vật liệu PC, kéo nén đúng tâm
Ngày nhận bài: 22/10/2018; Hoàn thiện: 12/11/2018; Duyệt dăng: 28/12/2018
(*) Corresponding author: Email: phanqthe@tnut.edu.vn
Trang 2http://jst.tnu.edu.vn; Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn
14
INTRODUCTION
FDM is a type of additive manufacturing
technology that applies the principle of layer
by layer with the uses of solid polymer
filament as a sort of work material The
material then is being heated to flow
temperature and being extruded out of printed
head under the action of force caused by
material feed system before deposited on the
machine table to form roads and layers and
eventually solidified and cooled within
envelop environment The FDM product can
have good designed shapes of accuracy of
minimum layer high as close as 0.1 mm and
wall thickness of 0.8 mm [1, 2, 3] Moreover,
the more choice in thermoplastic such as PC,
ABS, Nylon, ULTEM, etc is available, the
more options for FDM products is in practical
purpose However, even FDM has many
advantages of capacity either imitate very
complex structure in modeling or functional
in industrial and medical application, its
limitation exits in build time consumption
Small diameters of extrusion head lead to
longer build time; feed rate and plotting speed
are limited due to reciprocating motions [4]
The strength of the FDM part depends on
both the strength of the bonding between
roads, layers and density of voids in the part
To increase the strength of the part, different
layering strategies are applied and in some
patterns, are proved to gain better strength
[1-5] A model of bonding between roads based
on the 2D contact area with the concept of the
bond growth or bond length in relation with
diffusion phenomena and heat transfer
process occurring in the FDM working
chamber to determine bond strength is
proposed [6, 7] Longmei Li and co-workers
[7] did an experiment to show the effect of
post tempering on bond growth It was
evident that the longer time of tempering at a
certain temperature of 200oC, 220oC and
240oC for ABS, the higher degree of bond
growth is
Thermal driven mechanism is the main factor
to determine the strength of bonding It is clear that the higher extrusion temperature that closes to the flow temperature at the roads’ contact the better bond strength This is because the temperature facilitates the chemical effects at the interface of the roads
of contact in aspect of diffusion [6, 7] Temperature is therefore a very important parameter in FDM To determine temperature, some thermal models are built in which a simplified 2D thermal model and a lumped capacity model are widely applied The two models show prediction of temperature through the conduction between layers and along a road, respectively and of course the effect of convection from the build environment temperature on the value of temperature versus time dependent A direct connection between bond growths due to diffusion at a temperature above flow temperature is addressed The effect of history temperature on the cooling process of the part is mentioned and determined to by experiment through Sun and co-workers [7]
It is very clear that auto-adhesion of the roads
in the part has been investigated in micro-scale of 2D through the area of contact between them under the influence of heat generated during the process with the concept
of bond growth [8- 12] However, two cases need to be classified: Firstly, roads are in contacts in a layer results in the strength of the part depending on both contact in a layer and between layers (0 and negative air gaps) Secondly, roads are not in contacts (positive air gaps) in a layer to form a porous structure are the reasons for the strength of the part depending on only contacts between layers The material for all of the test is PC because
of the relative strength, the variety in functional purpose and the reasonable price compared to others This study concentrate on the behavior of PC model produced by 0 and negative air gaps and its effects on the strength of the FDM part
Trang 3EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Machine and manufacturing parameters
The machine used for producing specimens
was Stratasys Fortus 400 MC, made in USA
Nozzle T16 (slide height: 0.010 in/0.254 mm)
was used for depositing model and T12 (slide
height: 0.007 in/0.178 mm) for support The
material used for this experiment was
polycarbonate PC in the form of string with
diameter of 0.06 in (1.77 mm) and support of
0.07 in (1.80 mm) The hardness of the string
may be sufficient to create a pressure in the
nozzle for the flow of model out Width of the
road: 0.02 in (0.51 mm) and Height of the
road: 0.01 in (0.25 mm); maximum extrusion
temperature: 345C for model and 240C for
support, maximum oven temperature: 145C
by default
Manufacturing parameters were custom
selected as raster orientation: parallel to the
width of the tensile specimen; Air gaps were
0.000 in; -0.001 in 0.025 mm); -0.002 in
(-0.051 mm) and -0.003 in (-0.076 mm)
Mass of the specimen is then weighted on
OHAUS - PA214 scale with the accuracy of
10-4 gram (2.2046226218e-7 lb)
Tensile and compressive test was carried out
on the ADMET universal testing machines,
eXpert2600 Default setting: position adjusted
(or rate): 0.125 in/min (3.175 mm/min) until
position is 1.0000 in (25.4 mm), sampling at
100 samples/sec, load cell: 2250.0 lb (1020 kg)
Failure interface of tensile test is analyzed in
microstructure by using Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM) – FEI Quanta 600 (SEM) Setting: low vacuum mode, 40 Pascals using water vapor
Specimen preparation
The specimens for the tensile tests are designed following the standard ASTM D638 test specimen [11] as shown in Fig 1(a) and top view of raster orientation Fig 1(b) simulated in Insight software – Stratasys FDM system package The tensile test was carried out directly from the specimen shown
in Figure 1 to determine the strength between roads in layers The purpose of the test is to determine the strength between roads so the tensile test for the second direction (parallel
to the roads) can be ignored
The compressive tests were carried out on cubic specimen of 7x7x7 in mm (0.28x0.28x0.28 in inches) cut from larger specimen, then ground to get appropriate sizes and shape The compressive tests were carried out in two directions The strength between layers is determined in the perpendicular direction (Per) to the interface between layers The strength between roads in layers can be determined by the direction parallel to the interface and perpendicular to the roads (Pa) Polycarbonate at room temperature is a brittle material in glass phase and its compressive strength expects to be stronger than the tensile one The tensile and compressive tests are carried out in both
directions shown in Figure 2
Figure 1 (a) Specimen for the tensile test, (b) raster orientation from top view in Insight software
(a ) (b )
Trang 4http://jst.tnu.edu.vn; Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn
16
Figure 2 Directions of testing for FDM products
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Four groups of five samples were manufactured with different air gaps of 0.000 in; -0.001 in (- 0.025 mm); -0.002 in (-0.051 mm) and -0.003 in (-0.076 mm) Other build parameters were kept
by default from the machine’s recommendation Results of the tests are analyzed in aspects of material behaviors, modulus, tensile and compressive strengths through mechanical testing and the nature of roads in contact through SEM
Results in mechanical testing
Variation of dimensions and density
It is evident from the data experiment that the dimensions of the specimen increased with the absolute air gap values toward negative in which the height of the specimen was increased largest, the width increased much less and eventually the length increased negligible All changes
in dimension and weight are shown in Table 1
Table 1 Variation of the average height and mass of the specimen following the change of air gaps
By calculation, it shown that with an increase
of air gap values of (-0.001 in/-0.0025mm),
the density of the specimen is increased by
3.4% and then reduced by 8% compared
with that of air gap of 0.000 in (0.000 mm)
The voids between roads are illustrated in
Figure 3
The effect of voids is the model can be
evaluated through density only it is
impossible to include them in any sections
through the model due it is widely scattered in
both shapes and sizes The area of the cross
section is still evaluate as solid materials in
both tensile and compressive tests
Tensile strength
In fact, the tensile test was used to evaluate
the strength between roads in the same layer
In the tensile test, all the specimens were
suddenly broken with a soft explosion as
shown in Figure 4 Each type of specimen was tested for three time The average maximum load was recorded and then calculated in the form of stress as the tensile strength The result is shown in Table 2 according to the change in density of the specimens The relation between the average maximum tensile loads and air gap, and the relation between the tensile strength and air gaps are sketched as shown in Figure 4 All the values are calculated in relative to that of the values of air gap of (0.000 in/ 0.000 mm)
It shown that the law of change is the same for both loads and tensile strength However, the difference increases toward air gap of -0.003 (-0.076 mm) in
It is very interesting to note that the minimum load was 287.5 lbf (1279 N) corresponding to the air gap of 0.000 in The maximum load
Trang 5was 657.95 lbf (2927 N) corresponding to the
air gaps of -0.002 in (-0.051 mm), 2.29 times
compared with that of the air gap of 0.000 in
(0.000 mm) The increase of the load is
linearly proportional to air gaps form value of
0.000 in (0.000 mm) to -0.002 in (-0.051 mm)
and inversely proportional from -0.002 in (-0.051 mm) to -0.003 in (-0.076 mm) The law
is approximately the same with the tensile strength one except the values are lower due to increasing of the area of the specimen’s cross section according to the changes of air gaps
Figure 3 Optical micrographs showing the voids in the cross section perpendicular to the roads (a) air
gap of 0.000 in and (b) air gap of -0.002 in.
Table 2 Values of relative density and maximum tensile loads and strength in the relation with air gap’s values
Figure 4 Relation between the maximum tensile loads and air gaps of the specimens
Compressive strength
In contrast to the tensile tests, all the specimens in compressive tests were not broken even the overload value of the machine reaches at (2200 lb/ 997 kg) as shown in Fig 6(a) A transition point between the convex part and concave part of the graph is used to evaluate the compressive strength of the specimens The cross section was 7mm x 7mm (0.28x0.28 in2) An attempt was made to see the failure with the use of a smaller specimen of 3.5mm x 3.5mm (0.14x0.14x0.14)
Trang 6http://jst.tnu.edu.vn; Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn
18
in3 and air gap of 0.000 in/ 0.000mm There was a point of the compressive failure with a very small explosion as shown in Fig 6(b) It will be discussed in details in next section.
Table 3 Values of relative density and compressive strength corresponding to the transition point
in the graph in the relation with air gap’s values
Pa compressive strength (N/mm2) 63.07 70.24 78.95 77.73
Per compressive strength (N/mm2) 65.67 75.93 82.05 79.46
Figure 5 Relation between the compressive loads at the transition point and air gaps of the samples.
Similarity to the tensile strength, the relations between the compressive strength and air gap are plotted in Figure 5 The compressive strength here were recorded in not only between the roads
in a layer, parallel (Pa) but also between roads in different layer, perpendicular (Per) The tendency of change is similar to that of the tensile strength but the values are very close to each other However, the compressive strength at failure are much higher than that of the tensile strength as shown in Figure 7(b) FDM models can suffer very high compressive strength without failure
Behavior of Polycarbonate
Model’s behavior under tensile tests
Two examples of material behavior in tensile tests at room temperature with the rate 0.125 in/minute (3.175 mm/min) is shown in Figure 6 The specimen was suddenly broken at the maximum loads The average maximum loads were recorded as 1278.86 N; 2055 N; 2922.48 N;
2780 N corresponding to displacements of the specimens at the failure 2.28 mm, 3.81 mm, 5.21
mm and 4.31 mm, respectively and the specimen’s air gaps of 0.000 in; 0.001 in ( 0.025 mm); -0.002 in (-0.051 mm) and -0.003 in (-0.076 mm), respectively It is clear that the highest value of the load, the highest displacement of the specimen is
Trang 7Figure 6 Load and displacement under tensile test (rate 0.125 in/minute) in direction parallel to the
interface and perpendicular to road’s orientation (a) Air gap: 0.000 in (b) -0.002 in
Model’s behavior under compressive test
Figure 7 (a) Load and displacement under compressive tests, air gap: - 0.003 in in the direction
perpendicular to the interface of the layers (b) Compressive failure, air gap: 0.000 in, sample’s size of
0.14x0.14x0.14 in 3 (rate 0.125 in/minute)
It is obviously from Figure 7 that the material
exhibits more brittle at the air gap of 0.000 in
and the highest ductile at air gap of -0.002 in
(-0.051 mm) and reduce ductility at the air
gap of -0.003 in (-0.076 mm) The relation
between the tensile load and the sample’s
displacement is approximately linear at air
gap of 0.000 in to a more curve at air gap of
-0.002 (-0.051 mm) in as shown in Figure 6 It
appears that there is a connection between
high tensile strength and high displacement of
the FDM specimen and also the values of air
gaps The behavior of the model exhibits
more ductile behavior, the higher tensile
strength it is It shows that there is a change in
material behavior with different air gap’s values This can be explained by the principle
of FDM layer by layer resulting in microstructure different from that of solid polymers
The material behavior in compressive tests in two directions is shown in Figure 7 According to Ravi-Chandar and Ma [6], a testing curve of stress-strain relation of polycarbonate under uniaxial compressive loading can be divided into 4 regimes in Figure 5 in their publication In the 4th regime, the behavior of PC is approximately similar to that of plastic region in metals A nonlinear
(a)
(b)
Trang 8http://jst.tnu.edu.vn; Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn
20
stress – strain behavior is attributed to viscous
effects Non-uniform deformation appears
when the barreling initiates coincident with
the peak load The response of the specimen
beyond the peak load is not the constitutive
behavior of the material Polycarbonate
exhibits intrinsic softening
The behavior of FDM PC in this study is
different from Solid PC of Ravi – Chandar
and Ma The relation between the load and
the sample’s displacement is divided into 2
main regions In the first region of convex
curve in the graph, the relation follows a
convex curve and then a concave one in the
second region A transition between the two
curves is considered as a transition point of
PC behavior in load-displacement graph The
sample becomes flatter with the increasing of
the load, no failure for the designed
specimens was detected even the load limit of
the machine (2250.0 lbf) reached The
model’s behavior in the second region
appears in the way similar to ductile materials
in the second half of strain hardening of the
ductile materials
It is very interesting to note that a failure
point in the load – displacement graph was
detected with much smaller samples The
specimen failed immediately as shown in
Figure 7(b) or there was a small drop of the
load on the graph with a very soft exploded
with other specimens The specimen becomes
flatter and flatter along with the fact that the
load continues increasing to the machine’s
limit The failure’s behavior of the specimen
exhibits a characteristic of FDM structure
with void inside even in the specimen with air
gap of (-0.003 in/-0.076 mm)
Polycarbonate is a thermal plastic existing in
amorphous structure At room temperature, it
exists in the form of glass phase and is a
brittle material However, it appears that in
compressive process, after the transition point
is reached, the material behavior changes to like plastic one for all the specimens of the different air gaps in the range of the study Of course, the material behavior here may be not intrinsic softening as in solid state but the structure as a composite with voids in it is the main reason for this phenomenon
Microstructure analysis
It is very clear that the negative air gap is characterized for level of material overlap between roads The larger absolute value, the more overlap is The negative air gap therefore produces contacts between roads not only between layers but also in each layer The surfaces generated at the failure region under tensile test was examine on SEM The microstructure on the surfaces were different when different air gap’s values were applied The voids in cross section are shown in Figure 3 with smaller voids corresponding to the increase of air gaps toward negative values The failure of the specimen with air gap of 0.000 in is brittle fracture as shown in Figure 8(a) in combination with the largest areas of voids resulting in the lowest tensile strength The type of failure of the specimen with air gap of (-0.001 in/-0.025 mm) is also brittle fracture but the areas of voids reduces considerably in combination of larger areas of contact as shown in Figure 8(b) producing higher tensile strength in comparison with the first case It is very interesting to note that the areas of voids are reduced and the contact areas are also enlarge compared with the first two cases However, necking or ductile behavior appears on the failure surface as shown in Figure 8(c) In other words, the behavior of the specimen with air gap of (-0.002 in/-0.025mm) moves toward ductile resulting in the highest strength of the specimen The failure surface of the specimen with air gap of (-0.003 in/-0.076 mm) is evident to have negligible voids and brittle fracture occurred in nearly the whole of the
Trang 9apparent area of contact The largest area of
contact is the reason for high tensile strength
of the specimen than the first two cases
Figure 8 Failure surface of the specimens of air gaps: (a) 0.000 in; (b) 0.001 in (c) 0.002 in and (d)
-0.003 in
Conditions created to produce the specimen with air gap of -0.002 in (-0.025mm) may be involved with the most ductile property, a precious property for maximum tensile strength this model gets
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusions, the application of zero and
negative air gaps results in changes of both
the height and density of the specimen in this
study up to 26% for height and 8% for
density The tensile strength at air gap of
-0.002 in (-0.025 mm) increased by 2.14 times
compared with that of 0.000 in with only
approximately 10% of mass increased In
compressive test, the transition point in the
load-displacement graph is consider as the
compressive strength The law of change of
compressive strength is similar to that of the
tensile strength but the differences in two directions parallel to the interface between layers are very small Moreover, the differences in strength in relation of changes
of air gaps are also small The behavior of the model is evident to depend on the air gap Like ductile behavior is observed in the specimen with air gap of -0.002 in (-0.025 mm) and brittle behavior is detected in other air gaps selected in the study.
REFERENCE
1 Wendel B, Rietzel D, Kuhnlein F, Feulner R,
Trang 10http://jst.tnu.edu.vn; Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn
22
Hulder G and Schmachtenberg E., “Additive
Processing of Polymers – Review”,
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2008,
Vol 293, pp 799-809
2 Brian N Turner, Robert Strong and Scott A
Gold., “A review of melt extrusion additive
manufacturing processes: I Process design and
modeling”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20/3
(2014), pp 192–204
3 Brian N Turner, Robert Strong and Scott A
Gold., “A review of melt extrusion additive
manufacturing processes: II “Materials,
Dimensional Accuracy, and Surface Roughness”,
Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20/3 (2015), pp 250–
261
4 Kulkarni P and Dutta D., “Deposition
Strategies and Resulting Part Stiffness in Fused
Deposition Modelling”, Journal of Manufacturing
Science and Engineering, February 1999, Vol
121, pp 93-103
5 Ang K.C, Leong K.F and Chua C.K.,
“Investigation of the Mechanical Properties and
Porosity Relationships in Fused Deposition
Modelling – Fabricated Porous Structures”,
Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol 12/2, 2006, pp
100-105
6 Ravi-Chandar, K and Ma Z., “Inelastic Deformation in Polymers under Multiaxial Compression”, Mechanics of Time-Dependent
Materials, Vol 4, 2000, pp 333-357
7 Bellehumeur C, Li L, Sun Q, GU P.,
“Modelling of the Bond Formation between Polymer Filaments in the Fused Deposition Modelling Process”, Journal of Manufacturing
Processes, 2004, Vol 6/2, pp 170-178
8 Bellehumeur C, Li L, Sun Q, GU P.,
“Modelling of the Bond Formation between Polymer Filaments in the Fused Deposition Modelling Process”, Journal of Manufacturing
Processes, 2004, Vol 6/2, pp 170-178
9 Stark M.S., Improving and Understanding Inter-Filament Bonding in 3D-Printed Polymers, Thesis Project, University of Tennessee, 2016
10 Voyutskii.S.S., Autohesion and Adhesion of High Polymers, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1963
11 Osswald Tim.A and Menges Georg., Material Science of Polymers for Engineers, third edition, Hanser Publishers, Munich, 2012
12 Klein R., Laser welding of Plastics, Wiley – VCH Verlag GmbH & CO KGaA, 2011