Contents: The Public’s Opinion of Business Ethics; Business Ethics: Meaning, Types, Approaches; Ethics, Economics and Law - A Venn Model; Three Models of Management Ethics?; Making Moral Management Actionable; Developing Moral Judgment; Elements of Moral Judgment
Trang 1© 2015 Cengage Learning 1
Trang 2Chapter 7
Business
Ethics Fundamentals
Trang 3Learning Outcomes
1 Describe how the public regards business ethics.
2 Define business ethics and appreciate the complexities of
making ethical judgments.
3 Explain the conventional approach to business ethics
Differentiate it from the principles approach and ethical tests approach
4 Analyze economic, legal, and ethical aspects of a decision
by using a Venn Model.
5 Identify and explain three models of management ethics
Give examples of each
6 Describe and discuss Kohlberg’s three levels of developing
moral judgment.
7 Identify and discuss the elements of moral judgment.
© 2015 Cengage Learning 3
Trang 4Chapter Outline
• The Public’s Opinion of Business Ethics
• Business Ethics: Meaning, Types, Approaches
• Ethics, Economics and Law - A Venn Model
• Three Models of Management Ethics?
• Making Moral Management Actionable
• Developing Moral Judgment
• Elements of Moral Judgment
• Summary
Trang 5Business Ethics Scandals
• The public’s interest in business ethics is
at an all-time high, spurred by scandals.
• The Enron scandal impacted business so
greatly it is called “ The Enron Effect ”
But then followed more scandals:
• Worldcom, Worldcom Tyco, Tyco Arthur Andersen
• And then the Wall Street financial
scandals:
• AIG, Bear Stearns AIG Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros Lehman Bros, Fannie
Mae
Mae, Freddie Mac, and Freddie Mac Bernie Madoff
• Business will never be the same.
© 2015 Cengage Learning 5
Trang 7The Public’s Opinion
of Business Ethics (1 of 2)
• The public’s view of business ethics has
never been very high
• Anecdotal evidence suggests that many
people see business ethics as an
oxymoron, and think that there’s only a fine line between a business executive and a crook.
• A Gallup poll taken in December, 2012,
revealed that only 21 % of the public
thought business executives had high or very high ethics
© 2015 Cengage Learning 7
Trang 8The Public’s Opinion
of Business Ethics (2 of 2)
National Business Ethics Survey
Findings -
decreased slightly, from 49% to 45%.
the rise from 63% to 65%.
has increased sharply, to 22% experienced
retaliation.
companies with weak ethics cultures increased to © 2015 Cengage Learning 8
Trang 9Are the Media Reporting
Business Ethics More
Vigorously?
• It is sometimes difficult to tell whether
business ethics have really deteriorated or whether the media is doing a more thorough job of reporting ethics violations
• There is no doubt that news media outlets
are reporting ethical problems more
frequently and fervently
• The media had a field day with the Bernie
Madoff Ponzi scheme which defrauded
thousands of investors out of $50 billion
• Investigate reporting on ethics has been
shown on 60 Minutes, 20/20, Dateline
NBC, Rock Center and Frontline
© 2015 Cengage Learning 9
Trang 10Is Society Changing?
Former U.S Treasury Secretary, Michael
Blumenthal-
• “People in business have not suddenly
become immoral What has changed are the contexts in which corporate decisions are made, the demands that are being made on business, and the nature of what is
considered proper corporate conduct.”
•History shows that a good number of what are now called unethical practices were at one time considered acceptable.
•Or it may be that those practices never were
acceptable to the public, but because they were not known, it seemed they were tolerated
Trang 11Business Ethics Today versus
Actual Business Ethics
Trang 12Business Ethics:
Meaning, Types, Approaches (1 of
2)
Ethics – is the discipline that deals with
moral duty and obligation
Moral Conduct - relates to principles of
right, wrong, and fairness in behavior
Business Ethics -
•Is concerned with morality and fairness in
behavior, actions, and practices that take place within a business context
•Is the study of practices in organizations and
is a quest to determine whether these
practices are acceptable or not
Trang 13•Demands a more meaningful moral anchor
than just “everyone is doing it.”
this text © 2015 Cengage Learning 13
Trang 14Three Major Approaches
to Business Ethics
Conventional Approach
-•Based on how the average person views
business ethics, and on common sense
Principles Approach
-•Based on the use of ethics principles to justify and direct behavior, actions, and policies
Ethical Tests Approach
-•Based on short, practical questions to guide ethical decision making and behavior and
practices
Trang 15The Conventional Approach
to Business Ethics
The conventional approach to business ethics
involves a comparison of a decision or practice to
prevailing societal norms.
Trang 16Sources of Ethical Norms
Trang 17Ethics and the Law
• The law and ethics can overlap in many
respects.
• The law is a reflection of what society
thinks are minimal standards of conduct and behavior.
• Research of illegal corporate behavior
focuses on two questions:
1 What leads firms to behave illegally?
2 What are the consequences of
engaging in illegal behavior?
© 2015 Cengage Learning 17
Trang 18Making Ethical Judgments
Trang 19The Danger of Ethical
• One picks and chooses which source
of norms one wishes to use based on what will justify current actions or
maximize freedom.
© 2015 Cengage Learning 19
Trang 20Ethics, Economics, and Law –
A Venn Model
Trang 21Three Models of Management Ethics
Moral Management -
•Conforms to highest standards of ethical
behavior or professional standards of conduct.
Amoral Management –
•Different in nature from the others, it has two kinds:
• Intentional: Does not consider ethical
factors.
• Unintentional: Casual or careless about
Trang 22Characteristics of Immoral
Managers-These Managers:
• Intentionally do wrong
• Are Self-centered and self-absorbedSelf-centered
• Care only about self or organization’s profits Care only about self
or success
• Actively oppose what is right, fair, or justActively oppose what is right
• Exhibit no concern for stakeholders
• Are the “bad guys”
•An ethics course probably would not help
them
Trang 23Examples of Immoral
Management
-• Stealing petty cash
• Cheating on expense reports
• Taking credit for another’s accomplishments
• Lying on time sheets
• Coming into work hungover
• Telling a demeaning joke
• Taking office supplies for personal use
• Showing preferential treatment toward certain employees
• Rewarding employees who display wrong
behaviors
• Harassing a fellow employee © 2015 Cengage Learning 23
Trang 24•Their goal is to succeed within the
confines of sound ethical precepts
•Demonstrate high integrity in thinking,
speaking and doing
•Follow both the letter and the spirit of the law
•Possess an acute moral sense and moral maturity
•Moral managers are the “good guys”
Trang 25Habits of Moral Leaders
-1 They have a passion to do right
2 They are morally proactive
3 They consider all stakeholders
4 They have a strong ethical
7 They integrate ethics wisdom with
management wisdom.© 2015 Cengage Learning 25
Trang 26Positive Ethical Behaviors
of Moral Leaders
-• Giving proper credit where it is due
• Being straightforward and honest with other
employees
• Treating all employees equally
• Being a responsible steward of company
assets
• Resisting pressure to act unethically
• Recognizing and rewarding ethical behavior
of others
• Talking about the importance of ethics and
compliance on a regular basis
Trang 27Characteristics of Amoral
Managers-
Intentionally Amoral Managers
•Don’t think ethics and business should “mix.”
•Business and ethics exist in separate spheres.
•A vanishing breed.
Unintentionally Amoral Managers
•Don’t consider the ethical dimension of decision- making.
•Don’t “think ethically.”
•Have no “ethics buds.”
•Well-intentioned, but morally casual or
unconscious.
•Ethical gears are in neutral.
© 2015 Cengage Learning 27
Trang 29Two Hypotheses Regarding Moral Management Models
Population hypothesis
•The distribution of the three models
approximate a normal curve, with the
amoral group occupying the large middle
part of the curve and the moral and immoral categories occupying the tails.
Individual hypothesis
•Within the individual manager, these three models may operate at various times and under various circumstances.
© 2015 Cengage Learning 29
Trang 30Three Models of Management Morality and Emphases on CSR
Trang 31Moral Management Models And
Acceptance or Rejection of
Stakeholder Thinking
31
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Trang 32Making Moral Management
Actionable -
• The characteristics of immoral, moral and
amoral management provide benchmarks
managers recognize the need to move from the immoral or amoral ethic to the moral
ethic
condition that can easily be disguised as
an innocent, practical, bottom-line
philosophy But it is the bane of the
management profession
• Most managers are not “bad guys,” but
managerial decision-making cannot be
management must be discarded and the
process of developing moral judgment
© 2015 Cengage Learning 32
Trang 33Kohlberg’s Model
of Moral Development
33
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Trang 34Why Managers and Employees
Behave Ethically
Trang 35Ethics of Care as Alternative to Kohlberg
35
Recognize their own needs
and needs of others
Establish connections and participate in social life
Level 2
Level 3
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Trang 36External Sources of a Person’s
Values
Trang 37Sources Internal to the
Organization
Norms prevalent in business
include
-•Respect for the authority structure
•Loyalty to bosses and the organization
•Conformity to principles and practices
•Performance counts above all else
•Results count above all else
© 2015 Cengage Learning 37