Porous metal organic framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging, In the domain of health, one important challenge is the efficient delivery of drugs in the body using non-toxic nanocarriers. Most of the existing carrier materials show poor drug loading and or rapid release of the proportion of the drug that is simply adsorbed at the external surface of the nanocarrier. In this context, porous hybrid solids, with the ability to tune their structures and porosities for better drug interactions and high loadings, are well suited to serve as nanocarriers for delivery and imaging applications.
Trang 1PUBLISHED ONLINE: 13 DECEMBER 2009 | DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608
Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale
carriers as a potential platform for drug
delivery and imaging
Patricia Horcajada1* , Tamim Chalati2, Christian Serre1, Brigitte Gillet3, Catherine Sebrie3,
Tarek Baati1, Jarrod F Eubank1, Daniela Heurtaux1, Pascal Clayette4, Christine Kreuz4,
Jong-San Chang5, Young Kyu Hwang5, Veronique Marsaud2, Phuong-Nhi Bories6, Luc Cynober6, Sophie Gil7, Gérard Férey1, Patrick Couvreur2and Ruxandra Gref2*
In the domain of health, one important challenge is the efficient delivery of drugs in the body using non-toxic nanocarriers Most
of the existing carrier materials show poor drug loading (usually less than 5 wt% of the transported drug versus the carrier material) and/or rapid release of the proportion of the drug that is simply adsorbed (or anchored) at the external surface of the nanocarrier In this context, porous hybrid solids, with the ability to tune their structures and porosities for better drug interactions and high loadings, are well suited to serve as nanocarriers for delivery and imaging applications Here we show that specific non-toxic porous iron( III )-based metal–organic frameworks with engineered cores and surfaces, as well as imaging properties, function as superior nanocarriers for efficient controlled delivery of challenging antitumoural and retroviral drugs (that is, busulfan, azidothymidine triphosphate, doxorubicin or cidofovir) against cancer and AIDS In addition to their high loadings, they also potentially associate therapeutics and diagnostics, thus opening the way for theranostics, or personalized patient treatments.
For nanocarriers, the requirements for ensuring an efficient
therapy are to (1) efficiently entrap drugs with high payloads,
(2) control the release and avoid the ‘burst effect’ (important
release within the first minutes), (3) control matrix degradation,
(4) offer the possibility to easily engineer its surface to control
in vivofate and (5) be detectable by imaging techniques Moreover,
entering a new stage of molecular medicine requires the association
of therapeutics and diagnostics to make personalized patient
treatment a reality A step forward aims at conceiving a nanocarrier
that could serve both as drug carrier and as diagnostic agent (satisfy
criteria (4) and (5)), to evaluate drug distribution and treatment
efficiency (theranostics)
Currently, for delivery, some materials are being used (for
example, liposomes, nanoemulsions, nanoparticles or micelles;
refs 1–5) but are, for the most part, unsatisfactory; better routes
are therefore necessary to address the limitations Very recently,
our group6,7 (ibuprofen storage/long time release) and those
of R Morris8,9 (gas delivery of NO for antithrombosis and
vasodilatation) and Lin10–13(imaging) introduced a new pathway
by using hybrid porous solids14 (or metal–organic frameworks
(MOFs)) for this purpose However, most of the materials described
in these publications (that is, Co-, Ni- and Cr-based MOFs) were
not compatible with biomedical and pharmaceutical applications,
and, with few exceptions10–13,15–17, they were not engineered as
nanoparticles to enable controlled drug release by intravenous
1 Institut Lavoisier (CNRS 8180) & Institut universitaire de France, Université de Versailles, 78035 Versailles Cedex, France, 2 Faculté de Pharmacie (CNRS 8612), Université Paris-Sud, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France, 3 CNRS 2301, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette France and CNRS8081, Université PARIS-Sud 91405 Orsay, France, 4 Laboratoire de Neurovirologie, SPI-BIO, CEA, 92260 Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France, 5 Catalysis Center for Molecular Engineering, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT), PO Box 107, Yusung, Daejeon 305-600, Korea, 6 Laboratoire de Biochimie—Hôpital
Hôtel-Dieu—AP-HP 75004 Paris, France, 7 EA 2706, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris-Sud, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
*e-mail: horcajada@chimie.uvsq.fr; ruxandra.gref@u-psud.fr.
administration To circumvent these problems, the strategy of the present paper (Fig 1) was to take advantage of the character and performance of suitable iron(iii) carboxylate MOFs Their non-toxic nature and potential for nanoparticle synthesis (nanoMOFs), coupled with unusually large loadings of different drugs and imaging properties, make them ideal candidates for a new valuable solution in the field of drug-delivery nanocarriers
MOFs result from the assembly, exclusively by strong bonds, of inorganic clusters and easily tunable organic linkers (carboxylates, imidazolates or phosphonates14) This huge family presents high and regular porosities (φ up to 4.7 nm; pore volume up to
2.3 cm3g−1) enabling, for instance, the entrapment of large amounts of greenhouse gases18 They can show simultaneously hydrophilic and hydrophobic entities, as well as tunable pore size and connectivities, which can be adapted to the physico-chemical properties of each drug and its medical application19,20 Moreover, the high structural flexibility of some MOFs (refs 21, 22) enables the adaptation of their porosity to the shape of the hosted molecule
We have synthesized, in biologically and environmentally favourable aqueous or ethanolic medium, some non-toxic iron(iii) carboxylate MOFs (53, 88A, 88Bt, 89,
MIL-100 and MIL-101_NH2; MIL = Materials of Institut Lavoisier; refs 23–27) and have adapted the synthesis conditions to obtain these materials as nanoparticles (see Methods and Supplementary Sections S1 and S7; Figs S1–S5 and S11–S12), which were
Trang 2NATURE MATERIALSDOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608 ARTICLES
CORONA Biodistribution Targeting
~ 200 nm
CORE
8 Å Biodegradable porous iron carboxylates
Controlled release of challenging drugs
Imaging
MIL-53
6–11 Å
MIL-88
24–29 Å
MIL-100
29–34 Å MIL-101
Cidofovir
Busulfan
Azidothimidine
Figure 1|Scheme of engineered core–corona porous iron carboxylates for drug delivery and imaging.
100 nm
Figure 2|Scanning electron micrographs of MIL-100 (left), MIL-88A (centre) and PEGylated MIL-88A nanoparticles (right).
characterized in terms of biocompatibility, degradability and
imaging properties (Figs 1 and 2) Their efficiency as drug carriers
was tested with four challenging anticancer or antiviral drugs
(busulfan (Bu), azidothymidine triphosphate (AZT-TP), cidofovir
(CDV) and doxorubicin (doxo)), which, except the latter, could
not be successfully entrapped using existing nanocarriers (Table 1)
Some cosmetic molecules, such as caffeine (liporeductor), urea
(hydrating agent), benzophenone 3 and benzophenone 4 (UVA
and UVB filters) were also tested For biological applications, the
nanoMOF surfaces were engineered by coating with several relevant
polymers28 (see Methods); this treatment prevented aggregation
of the nanoparticles but did not improve the results Finally, the
potential of these nanoMOFs as contrast agents is reported
The first step of the study was to evaluate the performances
of the pure nanosized iron carboxylates in terms of degradability
and cytotoxicity Their in vitro degradation under physiological
conditions (see Supplementary Fig S10) shows that, in the
case of MIL-88A (fumarate) and MIL-100 (trimesate), a major degradation occurred after seven days of incubation at 37◦
C The nanoparticles lose their crystallinity and release large quantities
of their ligands (72 and 58 wt% of the fumaric and trimesic
acids, respectively), indicating a reasonable in vitro degradability
of the MOF nanoparticles Interestingly, in the case of MIL-88A, the degradation products, iron and fumaric acid, are endogenous (see Supplementrary Section S7), and show low toxicity values (LD50(Fe) = 30 g kg−1, LD50(fumaric acid) = 10.7 g kg−1;
LD50(trimesic acid) = 8.4 g kg−1) and LD50(terephthalic acid)
> 6.4 g kg−1(refs 29–32)
The nanoMOF cytotoxicity, studied in vitro (MTT assay; ref 33)
on mouse macrophages (see Supplementary Section S8), was low (57 ± 11 µg ml−1 for MIL-88A) and comparable with that of the currently available nanoparticulate systems34 Acute in vivo toxicity
experiments were then carried out after intravenous administration
of nanoMOFs in Wistar female rats (see Supplementary Section S7)
Trang 3ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALSDOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608
Table 1 | Structure description, particle size, drug loading (wt%) and entrapment efficiency (below the drug loading values in parentheses, wt%) in several porous iron( III ) carboxylate nanoparticles.
Organic linker
Muconic acid
HO
O O OH
Fumaric acid
O O
Trimesic
O HO
acid terephthalic
acid NH
2
HO O O OH
Amino Terephthalic
acid
O O
Crystalline
structure
29 (8.6)
29 (12)
34 (16)
8.6
Bu loading (efficiency) (%)
O
O O
s
O
O
O
s
13 4×3.5 amphiphilic
9.8 (4.2)
8.0 (3.3)
25.5
-14.3 (17.9)
AZT-TP loading
(efficiency) (%)
N NN
OH
OH
OH
O O
O O
OO
O
P
HO
N
NH2
11 9×9.1
-0.60 (6.4)
21.2 (85.5)
42.0 (90.4)
0.24 (2.8)
CDV loading
(efficiency) (%)
NH2
N
N O
O
O
P
OH
HO
HO
10 8×7.7 hydrophilic
14 (81)
2.6 (12)
16.1 (46.2)
41.9
-Doxorubicin loading
(efficiency)(%)
OH
OH
OH
OH
O
O
O
NH 2
MeO
HO
15 3×11.9
-9.1
-O
OH
Ibuprofen loading
(efficiency) (%) 10×5
-33
-22 (7.3)
Caffeine loading
(efficiency) (%)
N
N
O
O
CH3
CH3 CH3
6.1×7.6
-24.2
-23.1 (15.7)
Urea loading
(efficiency)
(%)
C NH
2
H 2 N
O
4 1×3.1
-69.2
-63.5 (1.9)
Benzophenone 4 loading
(efficiency) (%)
O
O CH 3
SO 3 H
12 0×7.2
-15.2
-5 (7.5)
Benzophenone 3 loading
(efficiency)(%)
O
O
-1.5
-*Bimodal distribution of sizes, with micrometric particles.
Trang 4NATURE MATERIALSDOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608 ARTICLES
Time (days)
Doxo
11 12 13 14
0
50
100
Figure 3|CDV (black), doxo (red) and AZT-TP (green) delivery under
simulated physiological conditions (PBS, 37◦C) from MIL-100
nanoparticles All experiments were carried out in quadruplicate.
Three different loaded porous iron(iii) carboxylate nanoparticles
were used They were built up either from a hydrophilic aliphatic
linker, fumarate (MIL-88A), from a hydrophilic aromatic linker,
trimesate (MIL-100), or from a hydrophobic aromatic linker,
tetramethylterephthalate (MIL-88Bt) (see Methods) Doses up
to the highest possible injectable amounts were administrated
(220 mg kg−1 for MIL-88A and MIL-100, and 110 mg kg−1 for
MIL-88Bt) Different indicators (the animal behaviour, body
and organ weights and serum parameters) were evaluated up
to three months after injection (see Supplementray Section S7;
Figs S13 and S14) Their comparison with control groups did
not show significant differences between them, except a slight
increase in the spleen and liver weights, attributed to the fast
sequestration by the reticuloendothelial organs of the nanoMOFs
not protected by a PEG (polyethylene glycol) coating As all
the body organ weights were back to normality one to three
months after injection (see Supplementary Figs S13 and S14),
the phenomenon was fully reversible The absence of immune or
inflammatory reactions after nanoparticle administration supports
their lack of toxicity Moreover, the absence of activation of
cytochrome P-450 suggests a direct excretion of the polyacids,
in agreement with their high polarity Finally, in vivo subacute
toxicity assays were carried out by injecting up to 150 mg of
MIL-88A kg−1d−1 during four consecutive days No significant
toxic effects were observed up to ten days after administration (see
Supplementary Figs S15–S17)
The non-toxicity of the iron nanoMOFs, proved above, led
us to investigate their ability to entrap anticancer and antiviral
drugs Chemotherapy indeed plays a key role in the treatment
of cancer in children Thanks to its efficiency, three out of four
children can now be cured Nevertheless, 25% of paediatric cancer
patients go uncured, and chemotherapy-induced long-term side
effects justify the continued development of new strategies to
fight childhood cancer Research in paediatric oncology is now
encouraged and supported by European legislation (Paediatric
Use Marketing Authorization, PUMA) and new international
organizations, such as the consortium Innovative Therapies for
Children with Cancer (ITCC)
In this context, the amphiphilic antitumoural drug busulfan
(Bu) is widely used in combination high-dose chemotherapy
regimes for leukaemias, especially in paediatrics, because it
rep-resents a good alternative to total-body irradiation35,36 However,
Bu possesses a poor stability in aqueous solution and an
impor-tant hepatic toxicity due to its microcrystallization in the hepatic
microvenous system (hepatic veno-occlusive diseases37) Moreover,
the current encapsulation of Bu in known drug nanocarriers, such
as liposomes or polymeric nanoparticles, is not satisfactory because loading never exceeds 5–6 wt% (ref 38), rendering our search of efficient nanocarriers an attractive challenge
Bu was loaded in the preformed nanoMOFs by soaking in saturated drug solutions (Supplementary Table S2, Fig S18) Table 1 shows the maximum amounts of drug adsorbed in several porous iron carboxylates The Bu loading in the rigid mesoporous MIL-100 may be considered as exceptionally high (25 wt%) This result is five times higher than the best system of polymer nanoparticles (5–6 wt%; ref 38) and 60 times higher than with liposomes (0.4 wt%; refs 37, 39) Owing to their lower pore volumes, Bu entrapment in microporous flexible structures (MIL-88A, MIL-53, MIL-89) is lower than for MIL-100, but significantly larger than for the existing materials Consequently, the use of porous iron carboxylates as nanocarriers could represent important progress for Bu therapy, especially because smaller amounts of solids would be required to deliver the needed dose of this drug Indeed, considering the actual intravenous dosage of Bu (Busilvex,
Bu solution in N ,N0
-dimethylacetamide; ref 40), the total amount
of MIL-88A or MIL-100 to be administered would be around
100 and 20 mg kg−1d−1, respectively, for four days Moreover, Bu-loaded nanoMOFs could avoid the use of toxic organic solvents
(N ,N0 -dimethylacetamide) during administration and reduce the liver toxicity mentioned above (hepatic veno-occlusive disease37,39) owing to the entrapment of Bu in its molecular form within the pores We have verified on cell culture experiments that the nanoMOFs were able to release Bu in its active form Studies on human leukaemia and human multiple myeloma cells in culture have shown that Bu has the same activity whether it is in its free form or entrapped in the nanoMOFs (see Supplementary Section S9; Fig S19) In the same way, we have confirmed the total absence of cytotoxicity of the empty MIL-100 nanoparticles
in the same cell lines
In addition to alkylating agents such as Bu, nucleoside analogues are also of major importance in the treatment of cancer and viral infections They include the monophosphorylated form of the antiviral phosphonate cidofovir, and the triphosphorylated form of azidothymidine, which are the active forms of these anti-cytomegalovirus and anti-HIV compounds, and doxorubicin, one of the most effective agents in the treatment of breast cancer However, the clinical use of nucleoside analogues is limited by their poor stability in biological media, often resulting in short half-lives and low bioavailabilities37, as well as sometimes partial resistance
to the drug41 The important hydrophilic character of nucleoside analogues also strongly limits their intracellular penetration owing
to their low membrane permeability42,43 Some nanocarriers were previously developed to circumvent these inconveniences, but show poor efficiencies together with ‘burst effects’44
The performance of iron carboxylates therefore indicated major promise for the entrapment of all the above important drugs (Table 1) In the case of AZT-TP and CDV, this was achieved
by simply soaking the preformed dried nanoMOFs in aqueous solutions of the drugs Even if the concentration of the drug in the solution was low, the active molecules could be loaded with high efficiency (in most cases, higher than 80%); the nanoMOFs act as remarkable molecular ‘sponges’ For instance, MIL-100 nanoparticles load up to 25, 21, 16 and 29 wt% of Bu, AZT-TP, CDV and doxo, respectively An unprecedented capacity of 42 wt% can be achieved for AZT-TP and CDV with MIL-101_NH2nanoparticles (Table 1; Supplementary Section S10 and S11; Table S3–S5), compared with 1 wt% values reported in the literature for these drugs in usual nanocarriers41
A progressive release of the three active molecules (AZT-TP, CDV and doxo) is observed using MIL-100 nanoparticles (Fig 3), with no ‘burst effect’ The comparison between kinetics of drug delivery and the degradation profiles suggests that the delivery
Trang 5ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALSDOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608
dm
s st
li
li
k
dm
st
dm
CONTROL 220 mg kg ¬1 MILL-88A_nano
Figure 4|Magnetic resonance images The images were acquired with gradient echo (a, c, d, f) or spin echo (b, e) sequence of control rats (left; a–c) and
rats injected with 220 mg kg −1MIL-88A (right; d–f), in liver (a, b, d, e) and spleen (c, f) regions 30 min after injection, product effect is observable on the
liver and spleen (dm, dorsal muscle; k kidney; li, liver; s, spleen; st, stomach.)
process is governed mainly by diffusion from the pores and/or
drug–matrix interactions and not by the MOF degradation Indeed,
the total delivery of AZT-TP occurred within 3 days, when only
approximately 10% of MIL-100 was degraded Moreover, tests
carried out in nanoparticles with smaller pore size than the drug
dimensions have shown very low drug capacities and ‘burst’ release
kinetics This suggests that, in this last case, the drug was adsorbed
only onto the external surface and not within the pores (see
Supplementary Information, Fig S20)
The promising data obtained with AZT-TP in MIL-100
nanopar-ticles incited us to evaluate, in vitro in human peripheral blood
mononuclear cells infected by HIV-1-LAI (see Supplementary
Sec-tion S10), the anti-HIV activity of AZT-TP A significant anti-HIV
activity was observed only for (AZT-TP)-charged nanoparticles
(about 90% inhibition of HIV replication) for a concentration of
200 nM in AZT or AZT-TP In parallel, the empty nanoparticles
demonstrated no cytotoxic effects, even at the highest tested dose
(10 µg ml−1of nanoparticles)
From the above results, it is clear that porous iron(iii)
carboxylates currently represent the best nanocarriers for the drug
release of important drugs Their unprecedented encapsulation
capacities apply to a large number of challenging drugs, not
only hydrophilic (AZT-TP, CDV, urea and benzophenone 4) but
also hydrophobic (doxorubicin, ibuprofen and benzophenone 3)
and amphiphilic (busulfan and caffeine) molecules (Table 1; see
Supplementary Section S13; Table S6) The adaptive internal
microenvironment (for example, amphiphilic polar metal and
non-polar linker) of the pores of this family of solids could probably
explain the exceptional qualities of these porous materials
Finally, we have investigated the potential of the nanoMOFs
as contrast agents We first proved by Mössbauer spectroscopy that the MOFs themselves (and not eventual iron oxide and/or hydroxide degradation products) act as contrast agents Magnetic resonance imaging measurements have been made on Wistar female rats 30 min after injection of 220, 44 and 22 mg kg−1 suspensions
of MIL-88A nanoparticles (Fig 4 and Supplementary Section S14) Both gradient echo and spin echo sequences show that the treated organs are darker than the normal ones (Fig 4d–f versus Fig 4a–c.) The resulting aspects of the liver and the spleen are indeed different between control and treated rats (Supplementary Figs S21 and S22) Also, three months after injection, the liver and spleen returned to
a similar appearance to that of the untreated animals (results not shown) This is in accordance with the temporary accumulation of the nanoparticles in these organs, as discussed previously
The favourable in vivo detection of the iron carboxylate MOF
nanoparticles makes them interesting candidates for contrast agents, and, to the best of our knowledge, this represents the first example for iron-based MOFs However, some examples of MOFs based on Gd (ref 12) or Mn (ref 14) as potential contrast agents have been recently reported The efficiency of our iron-based nanoMOFs is directly related to their relaxivity, in other words their capacity to modify the relaxation times of the water protons in the surrounding medium when a magnetic field is applied The higher the quantity and the mobility of the metal coordinated water in the first and second coordination spheres, the higher the relaxivity In this sense, our MOF nanoparticles possess not only paramagnetic iron atoms in their matrix, but also
an interconnected porous network filled with metal coordinated
Trang 6NATURE MATERIALSDOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608 ARTICLES
Table 2 | Transversal (r2) relaxivities of MIL-88A and
MIL-100 nanoparticles, PEGylated or not, measured at 9.4 T.
Fe (mmol l−1 ) PEG (wt%) r2 (s−1 mM−1 )
and/or free water molecules Table 2 shows the relaxivity of the iron
fumarate MOF (MIL-88A) nanoparticles under a 9.4 T magnetic
field Relaxivity values r1 could not be measured, but r2 of
MIL-88A nanoparticles are of the order of 50 s−1mM−1, which can
be considered as sufficient for in vivo use45 The relaxivity values
are related not only to the iron content, but also to the size of
the nanoparticles The PEGylated nanoparticles showed slightly
higher r2 values than the non-PEGylated ones The PEG coating
may modify the nanoparticle relaxivities in two opposite ways46:
increasing the size of individual nanoparticles and decreasing
their aggregation These results show that the iron-based core is
responsible for the favourable relaxivities and imaging properties
of the MOF nanoparticles Their framework contains (1) water
molecules strongly coordinated to the Lewis acid metal sites, as well
as (2) free water molecules, probably in exchange with these bound
water molecules, diffusing through the interconnected pores The
presence of this last type of water molecule should induce an effect
on the relaxation times of the water protons, resulting in good
imaging properties
In conclusion, our porous iron carboxylate nanoMOFs have
many advantages when used as non-toxic and biocompatible
drug nanocarriers In terms of synthesis, they are obtained in
aqueous or ethanolic solutions, instead of using organic solvents,
and provide an example of what ‘green’ technology can afford
for biomedical applications In the biomedical sense, they act as
molecular sponges, encapsulating drugs with different polarities,
sizes and functional groups by immersion in corresponding
solutions This simple entrapment method has been applied to
previously challenging antitumoural and antiviral drugs, as well as
cosmetic agents Progressive release was obtained under simulated
physiological conditions Moreover, anti-HIV activity of AZT-TP
loaded nanoMOFs has been proven
These results open new perspectives for improved treatment
with anticancer and antiviral drugs and for the development
of adapted formulations in paediatrics (using Bu nanoMOFs)
Finally, the iron-based cores are endowed with good relaxivities,
which makes these nanoparticles candidates for magnetic resonance
imaging (contrast) agents These complementary properties might
open new opportunities to use nanoMOFs for the eventual goal
as theranostic agents
Methods
The syntheses of nanoscale (Fig 2) porous iron(iii) carboxylates (labelled MIL-n)
with different topologies and compositions (iron trans,trans-muconate (MIL-89;
refs 21–24)), fumarate (MIL-88A; refs 21–24), tetramethylterephthalate (MIL-88Bt;
refs 21–24), terephthalate (MIL-53; ref 25), trimesate (MIL-100; ref 26) and
aminoterephthalate (MIL-101 _NH2; ref 27) were optimized by an appropriate
choice of the reaction conditions (conventional solvothermal or microwave
synthesis, solvent, additives, iron source, concentrations, energy, temperature and
time) (see supplementary Section S1) These porous iron(iii) carboxylates are built
up from the assembly of either oxo-centred trimers of iron octahedra (MIL-88,
MIL-89, MIL-100, MIL-101 _NH2) or chains of corner sharing octahedra (MIL-53)
and di- or tri-carboxylate linkers, leading either to microporous flexible solids
(MIL-88, MIL-89, MIL-53) or mesoporous rigid frameworks (MIL-100, MIL-101
_NH2) (Fig 1) The structure and composition of the resulting nanoparticles were
analysed using X-ray powder diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and infrared
spectroscopy In the case of MIL-53, MIL-88A, MIL-89, MIL-100 and MIL-101
_NH2, the synthesis could be carried out in water or ethanol.
In most cases, the nanoparticles’ mean diameter, determined by both scanning electron microscopy and quasi-elastic light scattering investigations, was lower than
200 nm, compatible with the intravenous route of administration (see Table 1) The nanoparticle size distribution of MIL-53 and MIL-88A was bimodal, probably owing to the competition between nucleation and growth during the crystallization process and to an aggregation of the particles.
To control crystal growth, PEG chains with only one terminal reactive group (amino or carboxyl) were added during the course of the synthesis process (see Supplementary Section S2) Thus, PEG led to the formation of a superficial PEG
‘brush’ sterically protecting the nanoparticles from aggregation Zeta-potential measurements clearly indicated that neutral PEG chains were located at the surface
of the nanoparticles Zeta-potential values of uncoated MIL-100 (−14 mV) were shifted to almost neutral values (−2 mV) in the case of PEGylated MIL-100, and from 17 to 2 mV in the case of PEGylated MIL-88A This is in accordance with previously reported data on PEG-coated nanoparticles 2
Bound PEG could be removed only after particle degradation under acidic conditions, supporting the fact that it was firmly bound to the nanoparticles through coordination of its amino or carboxyl end-group with the metal centres Indeed, when PEG with two non-reactive monomethoxy end-groups was added
to the reaction mixture, a negligible surface modification occurred Thus, PEG was successfully bound to the nanoparticles’ surface, and PEG contents up to 17 wt% were obtained, of the same order of magnitude as those described as being sufficient
to ensure ‘stealth’ properties (see Supplementary Section S2).
Received 16 December 2008; accepted 11 November 2009; published online 13 December 2009
References
1 Peer, D et al Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy Nature Nanotech.2, 751–760 (2007).
2 Couvreur, P., Gref, R., Andrieux, K & Malvy, C Nanotechnology for drug
delivery: Applications to cancer and autoimmune diseases Prog Solid State Chem.34, 231–235 (2006).
3 Gref, R et al Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres Science
263, 1600–1603 (1994).
4 Gabizon, A Stealth liposomes and tumor targeting: One step further in the
quest for the magic bullet Clin Cancer Res 7, 223–225 (2001).
5 Sheikh Hasan, A et al Effect of the microencapsulation of nanoparticles on the
reduction of burst release Int J Pharm 344, 53–61 (2007).
6 Horcajada, P et al Metal–organic frameworks as efficient materials for drug
delivery Angew Chem Int Ed 45, 5974–5978 (2006).
7 Horcajada, P et al Flexible porous metal–organic frameworks for a controlled
drug delivery J Am Chem Soc 130, 6774–6780 (2008).
8 Hinks, N J., McKinlay, A C., Xiao, B., Wheatley, P S & Morris, R E Metal organic frameworks as NO delivery materials for biological applications.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.04.031 (2009) (in the press).
9 Xiao, B et al Chemically blockable transformation and ultraselective
low-pressure gas adsorption in a non-porous metal organic framework.
Nature Chem.1, 289–294 (2009).
10 Rieter, W J., Pott, K M., Taylor, K M L & Lin, W Nanoscale coordination
polymers for platinum-based anticancer drug delivery J Am Chem Soc 130,
11584–11585 (2008).
11 Rieter, W J., Taylor, K M L., An, H & Lin, W Nanoscale metal–organic
frameworks as potential multimodal contrast enhancing agents J Am Chem Soc.128, 9024–9025 (2006).
12 Taylor, K M L., Jin, A & Lin, W Surfactant-assisted synthesis of nanoscale gadolinium metal–organic-framework for potential multimodal imaging.
Angew Chem Int Ed.47, 7722–7725 (2008).
13 Taylor, K M L., Rieter, W J & Lin, W Manganese-based nanoscale
metal–organic frameworks for magnetic resonance imaging J Am Chem Soc.
130, 14358–14359 (2008).
14 Férey, G Hybrid porous solids: Past, present, future Chem Soc Rev 37,
191–241 (2008).
15 Jhung, S H et al Microwave synthesis of chromium terephthalate MIL-101
and its benzene sorption ability Adv Mater 19, 121–124 (2007).
16 Hermes, S et al Selective nucleation and growth of metal–organic
open framework thin films on patterned COOH /CF 3 -terminated
self-assembled monolayers on Au(111) J Am Chem Soc 127,
13744–13745 (2005).
17 Scherb, C & Bein, T Directing the structure of metal–organic frameworks by
oriented surface growth on an organic monolayer Angew Chem Int Ed 47,
5777–5779 (2008).
18 Llewellyn, P L et al High uptakes of CO2and CH4in mesoporous
metal–organic-frameworks MIL-100 and MIL-101 Langmuir 24,
7245–7250 (2008).
19 Horcajada, P., Serre, C., Gref, R., Férey, G & Couvreur, P Nanoparticules hybrides organiques inorganiques à base de carboxylates de fer, PCT applications PCT/FR2008/001366, 01 October 2008.
Trang 7ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALSDOI: 10.1038/NMAT2608
20 Horcajada, P., Serre, C., Gref, R., Férey, G & Couvreur, P Solides
hybrides organique–inorganique à surface modifiée, PCT applications
PCT/FR2008/001367, 01 October 2008.
21 Férey, G & Serre, C Large breathing effects in three-dimensional porous
hybrid matter: Facts, analyses, rules and consequences Chem Soc Rev 38,
1380–1399 (2009).
22 Serre, C et al Role of solvent-host interactions that lead to very large swelling
of hybrid frameworks Science 315, 1828–w1831 (2007).
23 Serre, C et al A route to the synthesis of trivalent transition-metal porous
carboxylates with trimeric secondary building units Angew Chem Int Ed 43,
6285–6289 (2004).
24 Surblé, S et al A new isoreticular class of metal–organic-frameworks with the
MIL-88 topology Chem Commun 3, 284–286 (2006).
25 Whitfield, T R., Wang, X., Liu, L & Jacobson, A J Metal-organic frameworks
based on iron oxide octahedral chains connected by benzenedicarboxylate
dianions Solid State Sci 7, 1096–1103 (2005).
26 Horcajada, P et al Synthesis and catalytic properties of MIL-100(Fe), an
iron(iii) carboxylate with large pores Chem Commun 27, 2820–2822 (2007).
27 Bauer, S et al High-throughput assisted rationalization or the formation of
metal–organic framework in the iron(iii) aminoterephthalate solvothermal
system Inorg Chem 47, 7568–7576 (2008).
28 Gref, R et al The controlled intravenous delivery of drugs using PEG-coated
sterically stabilized nanospheres Adv Drug Deliv Rev 16, 215–233 (1995).
29 Sheftel, V O Indirect Food Additives and Polymers: Migration and Toxicology
148–154 (Lewis Publishers, 2000).
30 <http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/OECDSIDS/100-21-0.pdf> (2008).
31 <http://www.chemicalland21.com/specialtychem/perchem/
TRIMESIC%20ACID.htm> (2008).
32 <http://www.sciencelab.com/xMSDS-Fumaric_acid-9927173> (2008).
33 Mosmann, T Rapid colourimetric assay for cellular growth and survival:
Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays J Immunol Methods 65,
55–63 (1983).
34 Soma, C E et al Drug delivery to resistance tumors: The potential of poly(alkyl
cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles J Control Release 68, 283–289 (2000).
35 Vassal, G et al Is 600 mg m−2 the appropriate dosage of busulfan in children
undergoing bone marrow transplantation? Blood 79, 2475–2479 (1992).
36 Vassal, G et al Pharmacokinetics of high-dose busulfan in children.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol.24, 386–390 (1989).
37 Slattery, T et al Graft-rejection and toxicity following bone
marrow transplantation in relation to busulfan pharmacokinetics.
Bone Marrow Transplant.16, 31–42 (1995).
38 Layre, A., Gref, R., Richard, J., Requier, D & Couvreur, P Nanoparticules
polymériques composites, FR 04 07569, 7 July 2004.
39 Hassan, Z., Nilsson, C & Hassan, M Liposomal busulphan: Bioavailability and
effect on bone marrow in mice Bone Marrow Transplant 22, 913–918 (1998).
40 Madden, T et al Pharmacokinetics of once-daily IV busulfan as part of
pretransplantation preparative regimens: A comparison with an every 6-hour
dosing schedule Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 13, 56–64 (2007).
41 Thierry, A R et al Modulation of doxorubicin resistance in multidrug-resistant
cells by liposomes FASEB J 7, 572–579 (1993).
42 Loke, S L et al Characterization of oligonucleotide transport into living cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA86, 3474–3478 (1989).
43 Kukhanova, M et al Design of anti-HIV compounds: From nucleoside
to nucleoside 5 0
-triphosphate analogs Problems and perspectives.
Curr Pharm Des.6, 585–598 (2000).
44 Hillaireau, H et al Encapsulation of antiviral nucleotide analogues
azidothymidine-triphosphate and cidofovir in poly(iso-butylcyanoacrylate)
nanocapsules Int J Pharm 324, 37–42 (2006).
45 Roch, A et al Theory of proton relaxation induced by superparamagnetic
particles J Chem Phys 110, 5403–5411 (1999).
46 Muller, R N et al in The Chemistry of Contrast Agents in Medical Magnetic Resonance Imaging(eds Merbach, A E & Tóth, É.) 417–435 (Wiley, 2001).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge E Legenre, M Belle, F Kani, C Bellanger and E Jubeli for their help with the experiments We are grateful to J-M Greneche, H Chacun, M Apple,
C Bories, H.Hillarieu, and O David for their collaboration We thank K Storck,
V Huyot and R Yousfi for their technical assistance with the AZT-TP experiments This work was partially supported by the CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin, EU funding through the ERC-2007-209241-BioMOFs, ERC and KOCI through the Institutional Research Program of KRICT KRICT’s authors thank You-Kyong Seo for his experimental assistance.
Author contributions
P.H., nanoMOF synthesis, surface modification of nanoparticles, drug and cosmetic
encapsulation tests, toxicity assays, degradation tests,in vivo magnetic resonance imaging;
C Serre, nanoMOF synthesis, surface modification of nanoparticles, drug and cosmetic encapsulation tests, degradation tests, imaging applications; T.C., nanoMOF synthesis,
PEG modification, drug encapsulation and delivery, in vitro toxicity assays, degradation tests, in vitro magnetic resonance imaging; B.G and C Sebrie, imaging applications; T.B., in vivo toxicity assays, nanoMOF degradation tests, doxorubicin encapsulation and
delivery; J.F.E., nanoMOF degradation tests; D.H., synthesis of nanoparticles of MIL-101 _NH 2 ; P Clayette and C.K., anti-HIV activity of MIL-100 nanoparticles; J.-S.C and Y.K.H., synthesis of nanoparticles of MIL-100 and MIL-53 in water; V.M., busulfan
activity tests; P.-N.B and L.C., liver function evaluation in the in vivo toxicity assays; S.G., activity of Cyp-450 in the in vivo toxicity assays; G.F., nanoMOF synthesis, surface
modification of nanoparticles; P Couvreur, drug encapsulation and delivery, toxicity assays, surface modification of nanoparticles; R.G., drug encapsulation and delivery, toxicity assays, surface modification of nanoparticles, imaging applications.
Additional information
The authors declare no competing financial interests Supplementary information accompanies this paper on www.nature.com/naturematerials Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.H or R.G.