1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

Evaluation of 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose level and its relation to A1C and some diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

7 63 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 7
Dung lượng 244,87 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

To investigate the real postprandial plasma glucose status level and the relation between postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and A1c as well as diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Subjects and methods: The study was descriptive and cross-sectional with the population of 125 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. All participants were examined and measured postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and A1c. Results: Mean postprandial plasma glucose was 13.41 mmol/L and 77.6% of participants had poor postprandial plasma glucose control. When A1c was less than 7%, postprandial plasma glucose makes a predominant contribution to an accumulative A1c in comparison to fasting plasma glucose. Participants with poor postprandial plasma glucose control were more likely to have microvascular complications than those with good postprandial plasma glucose control. Conclusion: The present study provided new evidence of relation of 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose to A1c and some diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Trang 1

EVALUATION OF 2-HOUR POSTPRANDIAL PLASMA

GLUCOSE LEVEL AND ITS RELATION TO A1c AND SOME DIABETIC COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS

WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Nguyen Tien Son 1 ; Le Van Quan 1

SUMMARY

Objectives: To investigate the real postprandial plasma glucose status level and the relation

between postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and A1c as well as diabetic

complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Subjects and methods: The study was

descriptive and cross-sectional with the population of 125 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

All participants were examined and measured postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma

glucose and A1c Results: Mean postprandial plasma glucose was 13.41 mmol/L and 77.6% of

participants had poor postprandial plasma glucose control When A1c was less than 7%,

postprandial plasma glucose makes a predominant contribution to an accumulative A1c in

comparison to fasting plasma glucose Participants with poor postprandial plasma glucose

control were more likely to have microvascular complications than those with good postprandial

plasma glucose control Conclusion: The present study provided new evidence of relation of 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose to A1c and some diabetic complications in patients with

type 2 diabetes mellitus

* Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Postprandial plasma glucose; Fasting plasma glucose

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a group of metabolic

diseases which characterized by chronic

hyperglycemia Diabetic prevalence

has increased sharply recently (about

592 million people with diabetes) [1]

Multifactor control is a pivotal factor in

diabetic achievement goals, and among

them, glycemic controls are of great

concerns, including A1c, fasting plasma

glucose (FPG) [2] Physicians regularly

aim to decrease A1c and FPG and neglect

to control PPG [1] In clinical practice, there are patients who achieve FPG goal but not A1c [2, 3] Some studies pointed out that it was the increase of PPG that makes a contribution to the increase of A1c and diabetic complications as well [1, 2, 4,

5, 9] In the current analysis, we aimed:

To survey the real PPG control conditions and its relation between PPG, FPG and A1c as well as diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes

1 103 Military Hospital

Corresponding author: Le Van Quan (levanquan2002@yahoo.com)

Trang 2

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

1 Subjects

145 patients with type 2 diabetes

mellitus (T2D) were enrolled in our study

They were treated at Department of

Rheumatology and Endocrinology, 103 Military

Hospital They met the ADA 2014 criteria

for diabetes mellitus [2, 10], WHO 1985

for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and signed the

Informed Consent Form We further excluded

20 people with T2D who were treated with

insulin The present study was conducted

from June 2016 to December 2016

2 Methods

* Design research: Descriptive and

cross-sectional

* Study procedure:

- Clinical characteristics: Data were

collected at the first-time participants met

researchers, including age, gender, family

history, participant history, disease duration,

height, weight, waist circumstance, blood

pressure, and paraclinical profile, such as

whole blood count, lipid profile, BUN,

creatinine, microalbuminuria

- Glucose profile: Measurements of

glycemic profile were performed at

Department of Biochemistry, 103 Military

Hospital, which measured glycemic profile

at fasting states on the second day of

hospital administration including FPG,

PPG, A1c and C-peptide All blood

samples of glucose profile were taken at

the same time each participant

- Laboratory analyses: Blood samples

taken at the clinical examinations were

sent to laboratory at Department of

Biochemistry, 103 Military Hospital

Samples for determinations of A1c were

analyzed with HPLC (Roche A1c) A1c reflects the average blood glucose over the prior of 8 to 12 weeks Accordingly, A1c were used as outcome variables PPG samples were taken after participants‟ breakfast 2 hours and we assigned them with 2-hour PPG After at least 8 hours of fasting, participants were drawn blood for FPG samples Both PPG and FPG were sent to laboratory within

30 minutes and measured with glucose oxidase method

Insulin resistance was calculated with HOMA2 calculator (downloaded from https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/)

* Statistical analyses:

Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the correlations of FPG, PPG as well as glycemic variability (FPG and PPG) with A1c and PPG with HOMA2-IR Analyses were performed without adjustment for age, sex, BMI

We then calculated the proportion of variables in contribution to A1c explained

by the following categories: FPG, PPG Firstly, we calculated the association between A1c and each of the two variables (FPG and PPG) Because the two variables to some extent were correlated to A1c, and then, we calculated the distribution to A1c of each variables using the equation:

A1c = aPPG + bFPG + c

Contributions of PPG to A1c = a/(a+b) Contributions of FPG to HbA1c = b/(a+b) Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 18.0 A two-sided p (less than or equal to 0.05) was used as a criterion for statistical significance in all analyses

Trang 3

RESULTS

1 General characteristics

Table 1:

Age (years)

Gender

Disease duration (years)

Abnormalitites on ECG and

cardiac sonography

PPG (mmol/L)

Table 1 showed the clinical characteristics of the study populations at baseline There were the same proportions of male and female sex, and the majority of participants were > 60 year old Within patients with T2D, MAU accounted for highest percentage of all complications surveyed Though mean FPG was not higher than target for FPG control, mean of A1c (%) still remained high Nearly 80% of participants with T2D controlled PPG poorly and the mean of PPG was 13.41 mmol/L which exceeded the target for PPG according to ADA 2018

Trang 4

Figure 1: PPG control grades and diabetic complications

Participants with poor PPG control were likely to suffer from microvascular complications (such as, microalbuminuria and diabetic retinopathy with OR = 1.99 and 1.51, respectively) though there were no statistical significances (p > 0.05)

2 Relationship between glycemic measures and A1c

Table 2: PPG control and A1c control grades

Table 3: PPG control and A1c control grades stratifying by FPG control grades

Indices

PPG

Within the good FPG control group, there were up to 61% with poor PPG control

To have an insight on the distributions of each variables (FPG and PPG) to A1c, we found

0

Changes on ECG and

cardiac sonography

MAU

Diabetic

retinopathy

1.23

1.99

1.51

Trang 5

that the role of each variables varied from different A1c gaps and the lower A1c was,

the higher amount of distributions to A1c due to PPG (A1c < 7%) (table 5 and fig.2)

Table 4: Distributions of glycemic variables to A1c

Figure 2:

DISCUSSION

According to UKPDS, each 1% of A1c

reduction could lead to 21% of mortal rate

reduction [9] In our study, up to 77% of

participants poorly controlled PPG, which

showed that there was an inappropriate

attention to the role of PPG Theoretically,

blood glucose is mainly supplied to

human body after meals, while FPG only

accounts for small duration of time (4 - 5

hours estimated) before breakfast [8]

When put PPG control into consideration,

we found that there were 28 participants

with poor A1c control (> 7.5%), even

though they had an acceptable to good FPG control To investigate clearly about this fact, we found that in this special group, there were up to 23 people with poor PPG control These results were

consistent with previous studies [1, 13]

A1c reflexes an estimated average blood glucose over a 3-month period Due

to the fluctuation of blood glucose after meals, many previous studies had tried to find out the role of PPG and FPG to A1c [2, 3, 13] and they pointed out there was a relation between PPG, FPG and A1c but there were no clear evidence for the role

Trang 6

of each variables (FPG and PPG) to A1c

In our study, we stratified A1c of all

participants into 3 categories: less than

7%, 7 to 9% and above 9% and we found

that 63% of accumulative A1c due to PPG

if A1c < 7%, which was sustainable with

most of recent studies [8] These results

denoted that to get A1c target control,

only good FPG control was not appropriate,

which consistent with other studies [7, 8]

Whilst some studies figured out that FPG

had a strong correlation to macrovascular

complications, PPG tended to relate to

microvascular complications in patients

with T2D In our study, participants with

poor PPG control were likely to suffer

from microvascular complications (such as

microalbuminuria and diabetic retinopathies,

OR = 1.99 and 1.51 respectively, but both

p > 0.05) Some hypotheses were created

to explain this fact After meals, the high

fluctuation of PPG could lead to the changes

of oxidative agents and decrease in NO

secretion into circulation and VCAM-1,

ICAM-1, E-selectin especially when PPG

> 10 mmo/L [4] In Japan, a recent study

has suggested that high PPG was an

independent risk factor for diabetic retinopathy

due to endothelium disorders [9]

There were also some limitations in

our study, due to A1c is accumulative

blood glucose for about 3 months, we

need to take blood samples for PPG and

FPG more times during the baseline visits

of each participants and after 3 months

The number of diabetic complications was

too small (3 complications) but these

complications were common in patients

with T2D

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients with T2D mainly cared about FPG and A1c and the vast majority of patients had poor PPG controls, which more likely led to microvascular diabetic complications When a physician judges glycemic control in patients with T2D, he/she should take PPG into

consideration if A1c > 7 %

REFERENCES

1 Nguyễn Thị Thùy Dương, Võ Hồng Nhung, Đào Thị Thuận Yến Nghiên cứu tỷ lệ

tăng đường huyết sau ăn ở nhóm bệnh nhân đái tháo đường týp 2 đã kiểm soát đường huyết đói đạt yêu cầu tại Bệnh viện Nội tiết Nghệ An Tạp chí Nội tiết Đái tháo đường

2014, 12 (27), tr.239-247

2 ADA Diagnosis and classification of

diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 2014, 27 (1), pp.5-9

3 Antonio Ceriello Does postprandial

blood glucose matter and why Endocrinol Nutr 2009, 56 (4), pp.8-11

4 Ceriello A The glucose triad and its role

in comprehensive glycemic control: current status, future management J Clin Pract

2010, 64 (12), pp.1705-1711

5 Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U et al

Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM Diabetologia

1996, 39, pp.1588-1583

6 IDF Diabets Atlas ISBN 2 930229-85-3

2013

7 Meyer C, Pimenta W, Woerle H.J et al

Different mechanisms for impaired fasting glucose and impaired postprandial glucose tolerance in humans Diabetes Care 2006,

29 (8), pp.1909-1914

Trang 7

8 Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C

Contributions for fasting and postprandial

plasma glucose increments to the overall

diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetes

patients: variations with increasing levels

of HbA1c Diabetes Care 2003, 26 (3),

pp.881-885

9 UKPDS group Efficacy of atenolol and

catopril in reducing risks of macrovascular

and microvascular complications in type 2

diabetes BMJ 1998, 317 (7160), pp.703-713

10 Weerarathna T.P, Dissanayake A.S

Value of assessing postprandial blood glucose

as a surrogate for fasting blood glucose in an outpatient medical clinic Galle Medical Journal

2006

11 WHO Diabetes mellitus: Report of a

WHO study group 1985

12 WHO Definition, diagnosis and

classifications of diabetes mellitus and its complications 1999

13 Woerle H.J et al Diagnostic and

therapeutic implications of relationships between fasting, 2-hr postchallenge plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c value Arch Intern Med 2004, 164 (15), pp.1627-1632

Ngày đăng: 15/01/2020, 13:15

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm