1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

Safety of measles and rubella combined vaccine manufacturing by POLYVAC in Vietnamese volunteers

5 22 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 5
Dung lượng 86,13 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

To evaluate safety of measles and rubella combined vaccine. Subjects and methods: Randomized, controlled and single-blind clinical trial study was conducted on 756 people aged 1 to 45 years old in Hanam and Hoabinh provinces. Results: Incidence of adverse events within the 30-minute and the 28-day follow-up in the two study groups were 5.6% and 9.5%; 7.5% and 7.5%. Conclusions: Measles and rubella combined vaccine was safely used on volunteers and not significantly different from the control group.

Trang 1

SAFETY OF MEASLES AND RUBELLA COMBINED VACCINE

MANUFACTERING BY POLYVAC IN VIETNAMESE VOLUNTEERS

Nguyen Xuan Dong 1 ; Dinh Hong Duong 2 ; Nguyen Thuy Huong 3

Ha The Tan 2 ; Vu Tung Son 2 ; Vu Ngoc Hoan 2

SUMMARY

Objectives: To evaluate safety of measles and rubella combined vaccine Subjects and

methods: Randomized, controlled and single-blind clinical trial study was conducted on 756

people aged 1 to 45 years old in Hanam and Hoabinh provinces Results: Incidence of adverse

events within the 30-minute and the 28-day follow-up in the two study groups were 5.6% and

9.5%; 7.5% and 7.5% Conclusions: Measles and rubella combined vaccine was safely used on

volunteers and not significantly different from the control group

* Keywords: Measles and rubella combined vaccine; Safety

INTRODUCTION

In our country, the epidemic situation

of measles and rubella has changed

positively with the trend of substantially

decline morbidity and mortality after

implementing vaccines in the expanded

immunization programe However, measles

is still circulating with a 3 - 5 year period

of epidemic, rubella has an outbreak time,

especially the congenital rubella syndrome

in children increases the medical, economic

and social burden every year [1, 2, 3]

The goal of eliminating these two

diseases in our country is still difficult due

to the lack of vaccines The vaccine against

rubella and rubella used previously was

imported from India In fulfillment of a cost

decrease in the expanded immunization

programe and actively control, prevent

has successfully produced measles and rubella combined vaccine (MRVAC) according to technology transfer from Japan Before applying in community, we conducted this study to assess the safety

of MRVAC

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

1 Subjects

* Volunteers:

A total of 756 people in Hanam and Hoabinh provinces participated in the study, including 420 children from 1 to 2, 168 people over 2 to under 18 and 168 people from 18 to 45 years old There were 504 subjects vaccinated MRVAC and 252 subjects immunized control vaccine

Research time: from April 8, 2016 to July

27, 2016

1 Military Institute of Medicine Preventive

2 Vietnam Military Medical Univerity

3 Center for Research and Production of Vaccines and Biologicals

Corresponding author: Nguyen Xuan Dong (Nguyen.Xuan.Dong81@gmail.com)

Date received: 25/06/2019

Date accepted: 05/08/2019

Trang 2

* Vaccines:

Study vaccine: MRVAC vaccine produced

by POLYVAC

- Ingredients: Each bottle 10 doses of

measles vaccine is reconstituted with 5.5

mL solvent Each dose 0.5 mL includes:

Live, further attenuated AIK-C measles

Live, further attenuated Takahashi rubella

strain ≥ 1,000 PFU

Stabilizers: Lactose 2%; D-sorbitol

0.72%; L-sodium glutamate 0.4%; hydrolized

gelatin 0.36%

Antibiotics: erythromycin ≤ 12.5 µg;

anamycin ≤ 12.5 µg

- Lot number: MR-0115; production date: November 4, 2015; expiry date: November

4, 2017

Control vaccine: measles-rebella (MR)

vaccine produced by India Lot number: 012N4072; production date: July 2014; expiry date: August 1, 2016

2 Methods

* Research design: A randomized,

controlled and single-blind clinical trial study was conducted

Local, systemic and serious adverse events within the 30-minute and the 28-day follow-up were supervised, evaluated

to collect data by questionnaires The safety of vaccines were assessed by the incidence of such events

Vaccination

0 AE, SAE supervision 28 follow-up day

within the 30-minute Last check, questionnaires

Figure 1: Vaccination and adverse events supervision diagram

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1 Adverse events occur within 30 minutes after vaccination

Table 1: Adverse events within 30 minutes after vaccination in two study groups

MRVAC (n = 504)

Control vaccine (n = 252) Adverse events within 30 minutes after

vaccination

p

Events

Within 30 minutes after vaccination, the incidence of adverse events occurred in MRVAC group significantly lower than the control group, respectively: 5.6% and 9.5%

Trang 3

(p < 0.05, Chi-square test) In particular, mainly local events with redness at the injection site (p < 0.05, Chi-square test), pain at the injection site and swelling at the injection site No systemic events recorded The local events were mild and resolved after 1 - 2 days

2 Adverse events occur within 28 day after vaccination

Table 2: Adverse events within 28 day after vaccination in two study groups

MRVAC (n = 504)

Control vaccine (n = 252) Adverse events within 28 day after

vaccination

p

Events

Within 28 days after vaccination, the

incidence of adverse events occurred in

both MRVAC and control groups was

7.5% In particular, mainly fever (6.5%

and 5.2%), cough (2.6% and 2.0%) Other

events appeared at low rates Noted other

events such as sore throat, VA inflammation,

rash, predominantly occurs in children

aged 1 - 2 years The incidence of events

in the two study groups was not different

(p > 0.05, Chi-square test) Except for two

cases with severe and serious events, the

rest were mild and self-resolved after 1 - 3

days Local events prevailed within 30 minutes but within 28 days after vaccination, systemic events had a higher occurrence rate

The incidence of adverse events in our study was higher than single and lower vaccine had the same formula produced

in Japan and equivalent to some other

MR combination vaccines The study by Doan Huy Hau et al with AIK-C measles strain did not record the rate of local events, fever rate was 3.1%, cough was 6.2% and diarrhea was 0.7% Yamane et

Trang 4

al’s research with rubella Takahashi did

not found adverse events The study by

Takeuchi Y et al showed that the

prevalence of local events was 2.2%,

fever was 25.1%, rash was 21.4% and

lymphadenopathy was 3.0% The study

by Kumagai T had only 2 cases of mild erythema, 1 case of diarrhea and 1 case

of headache, the study by Ozaki T et al only recorded 1 case of mild fever, however the sample size of those studies were small [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

Table 3: Distribution of adverse events occurred within 28 days after MRVAC

vaccination by province

Hanam (n = 267)

Hoabinh (n = 237)

Adverse events within 28 day after

vaccination

p

Events

The rate of events in Hanam province

was 12.7%, which was significantly higher

than Hoabinh province (1.7%), of which

the majority of children were in the form of

fever, cough, sore throat occupying high

rate The cause of this difference may be

due to the time of deployment in Hoabinh

was from May to June, while in Hanam

was from April to May, coinciding with the

period of humid, hot-cold erratic in the

North, and as a result, young children was

susceptible with respiratory diseases, contributing to making a difference

3 Serious adverse event

- The first case: Male, 3 years old, MRVAC group He had sudden abnormal symptom from 6th day after vaccination with toxic infection syndrome (a fever

of 390C, leukocytes were 17.4 x 109/l), gastrointestinal disorder, abdominal wall reaction (±), McBurney’ point (±)

Trang 5

Preliminary and postoperative diagnosis:

Acute appendicitis After surgery, subject

recuperate well and was collected M1

blood sample according to the research

schedule

- The second case: Female, 27 years

old, MRVAC group Subjects had variety

manifestation from 3rd day after vaccination

with moderate fever, severe and prolonged

time swelling, redness, pain at the injection

site Conclusion: Injection site abscess

After taking antibiotics, anti-inflammatory

and antipyretic drugs, subjects recuperated

and completely cured after 1 month

Some serious adverse events associated

with MRVAC have been recorded such

as hypersensitivity reactions, acute and

chronic arthritis, encephalitis, subacute

meningitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome,

seizures, thrombocytopenia and autism

These serious adverse event cases could

not relate to vaccines Immunization errors

might be culprit of injection site abscess

case [9, 10]

CONCLUSION

Measles and rubella combined vaccine

achieved safety requirements with adverse

events occurring within 30 minutes, 28 days

after vaccination rate was 5.6% and 7.5%,

equivalent to MR vaccine manufactured

by India Two serious adverse events

cases did not associate with vaccines

REFERENCES

1 Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, Duong Thi Hong

Several epidemiological and clinical characteristics

of measles in Vietnam, 2013 - 2014 Vietnam

Journal of Preventive Medicine 2016, Vol

XXVI, 4 (177), pp.98-106

2 Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, Duong Thi Hong

et al Epidemiology of rubella in Vietnam,

2008 - 2012 Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine 2015, Vol XXV, 8 (168), pp.216-224

3 Tran Nhu Duong, Vu Hai Ha et al

Epidemiological characteristics of cases of congenital rubella syndrome surveyed at Vietnam National Hospital of Pediatrics, 2011

- 2016 Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine

2016, Vol XXVI, 10 (183), pp.35-42

4 Doan Huy Hau, Dao Xuan Vinh, Dinh Hong Duong et al Evaluation of safety and

immunogenicity of the MVVAC manufactering

by POLYVAC (phase 1 and 3) Vietnam

Vol XXI, 4, pp.110-117

5 Yamane Y, Nagashima T, Asahara T et

al Studies on the live attenuated rubella virus

vaccine III Clinical trials with rubella virus (Takahashi strain) vaccine in children and women Kitasato Arch Exp Med 1974, 47, pp.89-100

6 Takeuchi Y, Togashi T, Sunakawa K et

al Field trial of combined measles and rubella

live attenuated vaccine Infectious Disease Magazine 2002, 76 (1), pp.56-62

7 Kumagai T, Ihara T, Nakayama T et al

measles-rubella combined vaccine in school-entry-aged subjects with naturally acquired measles immunity Pediatr 2015, 57 (4), pp.597-602

8 Ozaki T, Nishimura N, Gotoh K et al

Phases 3 and 4 immunization immunogenicity with combined measles-rubella vaccine

Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2011, 85 (3), pp.250-255

9 WHO Supplementary information on

vaccine safety Part 2: Background rates of adverse events following immunization 2000

10 WHO Global Manual on Surveillance

of Adverse Events Following Immunization

2014.

Ngày đăng: 15/01/2020, 01:13

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm