1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Proximate composition of household waste and applicability of waste management technologies by source separation in Hanoi, Vietnam

10 80 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 1,07 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Abstract The organic fraction of municipal solid wastes in Southeast Asia, which has a high moisture content, accounts for a large proportion of total waste. Local governments need to pay adequate attention to the composition of wastes to determine alternative waste management technologies. This study proposed the use of a triangle diagram to describe changes in proximate composition and rates of successful source separation of municipal solid waste and to identify technical challenges about alternative waste management technologies such as incineration, composting, and refusederived fuel production based on physical and proximate composition analysis of household waste sampled in Hanoi, Vietnam, as a case study. The analysis indicated the effectiveness of different types of source separation as well as different levels of successful achievement of source separation as an adjustment mechanism for the proximate composition of waste. Proper categorization of wastes for source separation is necessary for the appropriate use of alternative waste management technologies. The results showed that, at a source separation rate of just greater than 0.52 in a threeway separation scheme, the waste separated as combustible waste would be suitable for incineration with energy recovery. Based on welldesigned scheme

Trang 1

O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E

Proximate composition of household waste and applicability

of waste management technologies by source separation in Hanoi,

Vietnam

Kosuke Kawai• Luong Thi Mai Huong•

Masato Yamada•Masahiro Osako

Received: 25 January 2014 / Accepted: 21 December 2014 / Published online: 1 January 2015

Ó Springer Japan 2014

Abstract The organic fraction of municipal solid wastes

in Southeast Asia, which has a high moisture content,

accounts for a large proportion of total waste Local

governments need to pay adequate attention to the

com-position of wastes to determine alternative waste

man-agement technologies This study proposed the use of a

triangle diagram to describe changes in proximate

com-position and rates of successful source separation of

municipal solid waste and to identify technical challenges

about alternative waste management technologies such as

incineration, composting, and refuse-derived fuel

produc-tion based on physical and proximate composiproduc-tion

ana-lysis of household waste sampled in Hanoi, Vietnam, as a

case study The analysis indicated the effectiveness of

different types of source separation as well as different

levels of successful achievement of source separation as

an adjustment mechanism for the proximate composition

of waste Proper categorization of wastes for source

sep-aration is necessary for the appropriate use of alternative

waste management technologies The results showed that,

at a source separation rate of just greater than 0.52 in a

three-way separation scheme, the waste separated as

combustible waste would be suitable for incineration with

energy recovery Based on well-designed schemes of

source separation, alternative waste management tech-nologies can be applied

Keywords Household waste Source separation  Waste management technology Proximate composition  Developing country

Introduction

In Southeast Asia, municipal solid waste is usually col-lected without source separation or pre-treatment and transported directly to landfills or open dumping sites, most

of which are rarely technically managed because of budget constraints [1] Heavy rainfall, combined with poor man-agement of disposal sites, allows a great deal of untreated leachate to leak into the aquatic environment near the sites Moreover, poor municipal solid waste management results

in methane emissions, which are generated in the process

of biodegradation of organic waste in the tropical climate

of Southeast Asia and have a greenhouse effect about 21 times greater than that of carbon dioxide Local govern-ments in Southeast Asian countries have struggled to extend the lifespan of current disposal sites and to secure new ones as the amount of waste collected has increased dramatically because of rapid population and economic growth in urban areas

Various life cycle assessment (LCA) models have evaluated the environmental performance of municipal solid waste management facilities and clarified the disad-vantages of poorly managed landfills as compared with alternative waste management technologies [2, 3] Alter-native waste management technologies such as incinera-tion, composting and refuse-derived fuel (RDF) production can reduce the volume of municipal solid waste to be

K Kawai ( &)  M Yamada  M Osako

Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management Research,

National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa,

Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan

e-mail: kawai.kosuke@nies.go.jp

L T M Huong

Institute for Urban Environment and Industry of Vietnam,

56/221, De La Thanh, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam

DOI 10.1007/s10163-014-0348-5

Trang 2

disposed of at landfill sites Incineration can also generate

electricity if the heating value of the wastes is sufficient,

composting can produce organic fertilizers that can

sub-stitute for chemical fertilizers and RDF can subsub-stitute for

natural resources consumed as fuel [4] With some

exceptions such as the Phuket treatment facility in Thailand

[5] and others in Singapore [6,7], large-scale incineration

facilities for municipal solid waste management are rare in

Southeast Asia, although some major cities have recently

begun to consider installing them [8, 9] Composting or

aerobic biological treatment has been applied at the

com-munity and neighborhood level as well as at the city level

as a component of a mechanical biological treatment

(MBT) system [10, 11] The Bangkok Metropolitan

Administration in Thailand has also started producing RDF

as a component of MBT [12]

Local governments face many difficulties when

replac-ing landfills with alternative waste management

technolo-gies because of technical constraints, and even if

alternatives can be implemented, landfills cannot be entirely

replaced because remaining residues will still need to be

landfilled The organic fraction contains high moisture

content and accounts for a large proportion of municipal

solid waste in Southeast Asia [13–16] The high moisture

content may encumber the operation of waste management

technologies and require additional fuel and materials or

pre-treatment processing [17] Previous LCA studies [5,

18–20] that have evaluated the environmental performance

of municipal solid waste management systems employing

alternative waste management technologies in Southeast

Asia assumed that the alternative technologies were

appli-cable, without any consideration of basic qualitative

parameters for operation of technologies, for example, the

proximate composition of the waste (moisture, volatile, and

ash contents) Local governments in Southeast Asia need to

pay adequate attention to the characteristics of their

muni-cipal solid waste to determine whether alternative waste

management technologies are appropriate for the waste

This study proposed the use of a triangle diagram to

confirm whether the current proximate composition of

municipal solid waste would be suitable for incineration,

composting and RDF production by using physical and

proximate composition analyses of household waste in

Hanoi, Vietnam, as a case study This study also identified

technical challenges of municipal solid waste management,

showing the ranges of change in proximate composition on

triangle diagrams as related to varying levels of successful

achievement of three types of source separation of

house-hold waste Note that this study did not account for other

relevant aspects, such as the chemical properties of waste

and financial feasibility, which are also important in

dis-cussions regarding the adoption of new waste management

systems in developing countries

Materials and methods Physical and proximate composition analysis Household waste was sampled from four urban districts (Ba Dinh, Hoan Kiem, Dong Da, and Hai Ba Trung dis-tricts; Fig.1) in Hanoi We selected eight collection points

of municipal solid waste from the four districts (two per district) on a random basis and requested the cooperation of community leaders and municipal solid waste collection workers in sampling waste from households Discarded household waste is collected daily in the evening in Hanoi, and we sampled household waste from the eight collection points every evening from 17:00 to 19:00 for 8 days from

25 November to 3 December 2011 except for 1 December, when sampling was not conducted because of rain A total

of 828 kg of waste was collected from 339 households (1252 residents), which was equivalent to approximately 0.12 % of the population in the four districts (1,055,800 residents [21]) Each day, the samples were immediately transported to a roofed area at the Cau Dien Composting Site located 10 km west of the center of Hanoi city Ideally, the physical composition analysis should be conducted promptly after sampling because the moisture content of wet wastes such as food waste is highly likely to leach into other types of wastes such as paper However, waste samples were stored for a half day because of practical limitations involved with doing the work at night The physical composition analysis was therefore conducted every morning from 8:00 to 10:00 on the previous day’s

10 km Vietnam

Hanoi

Dong Da

Ba Dinh Hoan Kiem

Hai Ba Trung Cau Dien composting site

Nam Son landfill site

Urban districts

Fig 1 Map of Hanoi, Vietnam

Trang 3

collected samples Six workers manually sorted all waste

samples into 16 physical categories of waste: paper, plastic,

glass, and metals as salable waste; and food, garden, paper,

plastic, wood, textiles, rubber and leather, glass, metals,

coal ash, ceramics, and other materials as unsalable waste

Coal ash is the residue from burning coal briquettes for

cooking This is a commonly used fuel source in Hanoi

[22], but it is not a common characteristic of household

waste in other Southeast Asian countries In some

coun-tries, coal ash is classified as a hazardous waste because of

its relatively high heavy metal content Paper, plastics,

glass, and metals are usually regarded to be salable

resources, but very wet or dirty paper products, broken

glass, plastic bags, and greasy aluminum foil were

cate-gorized as unsalable The proportion of salable waste to

total waste in the samples was probably lower than the

actual proportion because only waste that was certain to

have a market value was regarded as salable in this study,

and some salable waste may have been miscategorized as

unsalable After the waste samples had been sorted into the

16 categories, they were weighed with a digital scale

(CJ-8200, Shinko Denshi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a

minimum reading of 0.1 g The weights were verified to

detect data entry errors by comparing the total weight

before and after sorting

Proximate composition data (data on moisture, volatile,

and ash contents) of all categories of waste samples were

obtained twice during the 8-day sampling period, and the

average values of each waste category served as a basis of

estimation of changes in proximate composition of

household waste after source separation The following

procedure was used to analyze proximate composition

Samples of each of the 15 waste types (excluding ‘‘other’’)

were reduced to approximately 100 g each by the conical

quartering method The reduced sub-samples were dried in

a laboratory drier at 85°C for 3 days to measure the

moisture content Although an authorized method in Japan

[23] states that samples should be dried at 105°C for

moisture content measurements, we used 85°C to prevent

the plastic sample from melting The dried samples were

burned at 800°C for 2 h in an incinerator to measure

volatile (i.e., combustible) and ash contents We did not

estimate the volatile content of glass, metals, and ceramics,

which were categorized as non-combustible The average

proximate composition of all 11 unsalable waste samples

was substituted for that of the ‘‘other’’ category

Moisture, volatile, and ash contents of household waste

were calculated with Eqs.1,2and3, respectively

WH¼X Wi Mi

VH¼X Vi Mi

AH¼X Ai Mi

where WHis moisture content of household waste (%), Wi

is moisture content of waste category i (%), Miis physical composition of waste category i (%), VHis volatile content

of household waste (%), Vi is volatile content of waste category i (%), AHis ash content of household waste (%), and Aiis ash content of waste category i (%)

We detected a notable transfer of water from food waste

to unsalable paper and plastic waste because it took at least

a half day to initiate the analysis of the moisture content of the wastes after sampling To simulate the original moisture content of the wastes before the water transfer resulting from the delay, we adjusted the moisture content of unsal-able paper and plastic waste to match those of salunsal-able ones, which were found to contain much less moisture The moisture content of food waste was then correspondingly increased The ratios between volatile and ash content in food and unsalable paper and plastic waste were maintained

at the same values before and after the adjustment Some parameters include uncertainties as a result of various fac-tors The effects caused by these uncertainties should be considered in our analysis In particular, moisture content in household waste plays a significant role when determining the applicability of waste management technologies Therefore, in the presentation of results, uncertainty in moisture content was shown as a range when visualizing the ranges of change in proximate composition of household waste depending on achievement levels of source separa-tion Uncertainty of moisture content of all waste categories ranged from -5 to 5 % of the average measured value, and proximate composition based on the uncertainty was cal-culated with Eqs 4,5, and6, respectively:

WHU¼X Wi 1  Uð Þ  Mi

VHU¼X 100  Wif  1  Uð Þg  Vi Mi

AHU¼X 100  Wif  1  Uð Þg  Ai Mi

where WHUis moisture content of household waste based on uncertainty (%), U is the uncertainty of moisture content for all waste categories, VHU is volatile content of household waste based on uncertainty (%), and AHUis ash content of household waste based on uncertainty (%) The uncertainty

of moisture content changes at the same time for all cate-gories of waste within a defined range (U 0:05)

Scenarios and achievement rate of source separation Source separation of household waste is regarded as a fundamental policy of waste management in Japan Each

Trang 4

local government designs its own categories of source

separation in line with local policies and conditions

Municipalities have depended largely on incineration

technology for municipal solid waste management; almost

all municipalities have combustible waste (usually

including food waste) as a category of source separation In

addition to combustible waste, containers and packaging

wastes such as cardboard, beverage bottles, and aluminum

cans are also often collected separately Less commonly,

some municipalities collect food waste separately for

composting or anaerobic digestion Because categories of

source separation in Japan vary from municipality to

municipality, new residents may initially be confused at the

sometimes complicated and unique categories of source

separation

In this study, we propose three source separation

sce-narios, all of which are designed to be easy to understand

In scenario I, household waste was separated into two

types: combustible waste for incineration or RDF

produc-tion and non-combustible waste for landfilling In scenario

II, household waste was also separated into two types:

biodegradable waste for composting and

non-biodegrad-able waste for incineration or landfilling In scenario III,

household waste was separated into three types:

combus-tible waste for incineration or RDF production,

non-com-bustible waste for landfilling, and biodegradable waste for

composting

Because it would be almost impossible in practice for all

people to perfectly separate their household waste, we

defined the ‘‘achievement rate of source separation’’ as the

proportion of the actual separation rate (x) When

house-hold waste is separated into two types (A and B;

corre-sponding to scenarios I and II), some of the waste

categorized as A will be appropriately separated as A (x),

but some will be inappropriately separated as B (1 x)

(Fig.2) In scenarios I and II, the achievement rate was

assumed to range from 0.5 to 1.0, and an achievement rate

of 0.5 implies that sorting is random and that waste

sepa-rated as A will be of the same quality as waste sepasepa-rated as

B An achievement rate of 0.7 in scenario I, for example,

represents the situation in which 0.7 of combustible waste

by weight is appropriately separated as combustible waste,

and the remaining 0.3 by weight is incorrectly included as

non-combustible waste An achievement rate of 1.0 means

that all household waste is perfectly separated When

household waste is separated into three types (A, B, and C;

corresponding to scenario III), we assumed that the rate of

inappropriate separation was ð1 xÞ  0:5 (Fig.3) In

scenario III, the achievement rate was assumed to range

from 0.33 to 1.0, and an achievement rate of 0.33 implies

that sorting is random and that waste separated as A will be

of the same quality as waste separated as B and C The

achievement rates of source separation of waste

categorized as A, B, and C were set as a single parameter to simplify the case study

Taking into account the uncertainty in the measurements

of moisture content, the ranges of change in the proximate composition shown on the triangle diagrams in the results represent achievement rates ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 in scenarios I and II and from 0.33 to 1.0 in scenario III In Japan, almost all municipalities treat food and garden waste at incineration plants Food and garden waste were, therefore, categorized as combustible waste in scenario I following the waste management practice in Japan and as biodegradable waste in scenarios II and III (Table1) Paper

Waste categorized as B Waste categorized as A

Separated

as B

Separated

as A

Separated appropriately Separated inappropriately

Fig 2 Achievement rate of source separation (x) for two waste categories to be separated

Waste categorized as C Waste categorized as A

Separated

as C

Separated

as A

Waste categorized as B

Separated

as B

Separated appropriately Separated inappropriately

Fig 3 Achievement rate of source separation (x) for three waste categories to be separated

Trang 5

and wood waste were not categorized as biodegradable

waste in scenarios II and III because of the much longer

time period required for biodegradation as compared with

food and garden waste

Proximate composition boundaries

Each waste management technology has application limits

depending on the proximate composition of the particular

type of waste [24] This study adopted the range limits of

Tanaka et al [25] as follows

Equation7 shows the ranges of volatile content and

moisture content for the self-sustaining combustion of

waste (Fig.4), and Eq.8 shows the ranges of them for

energy recovery by incineration (Fig.5):

3352\HL ¼ 210  Vð Þ  25  Wð Þ; ð7Þ

where HL is lower heating value (kJ kg-1), V is volatile

content (%), and W is moisture content (%)

Equation9shows the range of the moisture content that

allows sufficient oxygen and water supply for aerobic

digestion for composting, and Eq.10 shows the

relation-ship between moisture and volatile content that allows

moisture to evaporate with aerobic metabolic heat (Fig.6):

and

Equation11 shows the moisture content boundary for

RDF production at which it is not necessary to install a

pre-treatment facility for drying waste, and Eq.12shows the

volatile content boundary at which waste is available as

fuel above 12,570 kJ kg-1of higher heating value (Fig.7)

and

Equation13 shows the moisture content boundary for truck unloading, moving heavy equipment, and covering soil during landfilling (Fig.8):

Results and discussion Physical and proximate composition Food waste was the largest component of household waste, accounting for 57.3 % of total waste; it also had the highest moisture content (76.1 %; Table2) The average moisture, volatile, and ash contents for the household waste collected were 57.7, 24.1, and 18.2 %, respectively Coal ash

Table 1 Types and categories of household waste based on scenarios of source separation

Food Garden Paper Plastic Wood Textiles Rubber

and leather

Glass Metals Coal

ash

Ceramics Other

materials

4 Included

80 60 40 20 0

100

Volatile (%)

Application range of incineration

3352 < HL(kJ kg-1)

Fig 4 Application range of incineration for varying sets of proxi-mate composition HL is lower heating value The shaded area indicates the area, where the technology is feasible given the proximate conditions

Trang 6

accounted for 11.3 % of household waste by weight and

was categorized as non-combustible waste in consideration

of its relatively low volatile content (6.7 %) and high ash

content (81.1 %) This analysis indicated that the use of

coal briquettes for cooking had a considerable effect on the

physical and proximate composition of household waste in

Hanoi However, coal briquettes are expected to be

replaced in the near future by propane gas as living

con-ditions improve In that case, a much smaller amount of

coal ash would be generated by households The moisture

content of paper and plastics sorted as unsalable waste

exceeded 50 %, most likely because of transfer of moisture

content from food waste Salable waste accounted for only 3.6 % of the total, and the moisture content of the paper and plastics sorted as salable waste was much lower, less than 10 % in each case As stated previously, the actual proportion of salable waste may have been higher because the sorting criteria of physical composition analysis were very conservative Household hazardous wastes such as syringes, fluorescent lamps, and dry-cell batteries were observed during the physical composition analysis, but the proportion was very small and the items were included in the appropriate category (i.e., syringes, plastic; fluorescent lamps, glass; and dry-cell batteries, metal)

80

60

40

20

0

100

Volatile (%)

Application range of

incineration with

energy recovery

6285 < HL (kJ kg -1)

Fig 5 Application range of incineration with energy recovery for

varying sets of proximate composition HLis lower heating value The

shaded area indicates the area, where the technology is feasible given

the proximate conditions

80

60

40

20

0

100

Volatile (%)

Application range

of composting

Fig 6 Application range of composting for varying sets of proximate

composition The shaded area indicates the area where the

technol-ogy is feasible given the proximate conditions

80 60 40 20 0

100

Volatile (%)

Application range

of RDF production

Fig 7 Application range of RDF production for varying sets of proximate composition The shaded area indicates the area where the technology is feasible given the proximate conditions

80 60 40 20 0

100

Volatile (%)

Application range of landfilling

Fig 8 Application range of landfilling for varying sets of proximate composition The shaded area indicates the area where the technol-ogy is feasible given the proximate conditions

Trang 7

Table3 shows the adjusted proximate composition of

food, unsalable paper, and plastic waste simulating the

original composition before the transfer of water from food

waste to the paper and plastic waste The moisture content

of food waste increased from 76.1 to 88.0 % corresponding

with the adjustment of the moisture contents of unsalable

paper and plastic waste from 55.2 to 8.3 % and 53.4 to

7.3 %, respectively These adjusted values were utilized for

estimating the changes in proximate composition of

household waste in line with source separation

achieve-ment as discussed in the next section

Scenarios and changes in proximate composition

The lower heating value of household waste in Hanoi was

estimated to be 3591 kJ kg-1 by Eq.7, which is barely

greater than the level necessary for self-sustaining

com-bustion (Fig.9) The high proportion of food waste with its

high moisture content reduced the lower heating value

Figure9illustrates that additional drying would be

neces-sary to manage current household waste in Hanoi at

incineration plants with energy recovery and at RDF pro-duction plants

Figure10 shows the ranges of change in proximate composition of household waste according to achievement rate of source separation for scenario I (household waste was separated into combustible and non-combustible waste) Moisture and volatile content of the waste sepa-rated as combustible waste showed little change as the achievement rate increased, and the lower heating value of the combustible waste peaked at 3571–4774 kJ kg-1when the achievement rate was set at 1.0 Source separation of

Table 2 Physical and

proximate composition of

household waste sampled in

Hanoi (%)

Salable

Unsalable

Table 3 Adjusted proximate composition of food, and unsalable

paper and plastic waste (%)

80

60

40

20

0

100

Volatile (%)

Fig 9 Current proximate composition of household waste in Hanoi (filled diamond) The solid lines inside the triangle diagram reflect the boundaries of respective waste management technologies

Trang 8

household waste with a high proportion of food and garden

waste, as presented in scenario I, would not be effective in

increasing the heating value of the waste Furthermore, this

scenario suggests that food and garden waste, which have a

high moisture content, should not be included in the waste

to be incinerated given the current waste composition in

Hanoi In addition, the volatile content of the coal ash

prevents the volatile content of the waste separated as

non-combustible waste from reaching zero

The triangle diagram for scenario II (household waste

was separated into biodegradable and non-biodegradable

waste, Fig.11) shows that the applicability of incineration

of the waste separated as non-biodegradable waste rises

with increases in the achievement rate Because the

mois-ture content of the waste separated as biodegradable waste

increased as the achievement rate increased, it would be

necessary to add water-conditioning agents such as rice

husks and rice straw to the composting process to adjust the

moisture content of the waste Fortunately, it would be

relatively easy to secure these materials in Vietnam, which

is a major producer of rice Although we categorized paper

and wood waste as non-biodegradable waste in this study,

they are actually biodegradable in the long term and absorb

moisture, prevent odors under anaerobic conditions, and

increase air circulation [4] To successfully apply

inciner-ation with energy recovery, the achievement rate needs to

be greater than 0.74 for the waste separated as

non-bio-degradable waste The maximum lower heating value of

the waste separated as non-biodegradable waste was

9600–9763 kJ kg-1 at an achievement rate of 1.0 Even

with an achievement rate of 1.0, the volatile content of the

waste separated as non-biodegradable waste did not meet the criteria for RDF production

Figure12 shows the triangle diagram for scenario III (household waste was separated into combustible, non-combustible, and biodegradable waste) The ranges of change in the proximate composition of the waste separated

as combustible waste were ideally distributed to be treated

80

60

40

20

0

100

Volatile (%)

0.5

1.0

1.0 0.5

Separated as combustible waste Separated as non-combustible waste

Fig 10 Range of changes in proximate composition of household

waste at various achievement rates of source separation in scenario I

(shaded areas) The lines inside shaded areas reflect proximate

composition at 0.1 intervals of achievement rates from 0.5 to 1.0

80

60

40

20

0

100

Volatile (%) Separated as biodegradable waste Separated as non-biodegradable waste

0.5

1.0

0.5

1.0

Fig 11 Range of changes in proximate composition of household waste at various achievement rates of source separation in scenario II (shaded areas) The lines inside shaded areas reflect proximate composition at 0.1 intervals of achievement rates from 0.5 to 1.0

80

60

40

20

0

100

Volatile (%)

Separated as non-combustible waste Separated as biodegradable waste Separated as combustible waste

0.5

1.0

0.5 1.0

1.0 0.5

Fig 12 Range of changes in proximate composition of household waste at various achievement rates of source separation in scenario III (shaded areas) The lines inside shaded areas reflect proximate composition at an achievement rate of 0.33 and at 0.1 intervals of achievement rates from 0.4 to 1.0

Trang 9

with incineration At higher source separation rates, moisture

content decreased and the amount of volatile matter

increased To successfully apply incineration with energy

recovery, the achievement rate needs to be just greater than

0.52 for the waste separated as combustible waste When the

achievement rate exceeded 0.92, the waste separated as

combustible waste could be applied for RDF production The

maximum lower heating value of the waste separated as

combustible waste was 14,498–14,729 kJ kg-1 at an

achievement rate of 1.0

Conclusion

This study analyzed the effect of source separation on

changes in proximate composition of household waste in

Hanoi, Vietnam, and on the applicability of alternative

waste management technologies with triangle diagrams

Proper categorization of wastes for source separation is

necessary if alternative waste management technologies

are to be used successfully The results showed that the

two-way separation scheme categorizing household waste

into biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste (scenario

II) was more effective to apply for incineration with energy

recovery than that of the scheme categorizing household

waste into combustible and non-combustible waste

(sce-nario I) At a source separation rate of just greater than 0.52

in the three-way separation scheme presented in scenario

III, the waste separated as combustible waste would be

suitable for incineration with energy recovery; moreover,

the waste could be applied for RDF production with an

achievement rate of greater than 0.92 Therefore,

well-designed source separation schemes should be an important

component of alternative waste management technologies

This study focused only on the proximate composition

to evaluate the applicability of alternative waste

manage-ment technologies to landfilling, but other aspects should

also be studied to strengthen the utility of the analytical

tool After composting and RDF production, the processed

wastes will be sold and distributed as secondary resources

To produce reliable and safe products, wastes input in the

processes must meet chemical criteria, such as pH and

concentration of heavy metals and chloride [26] Financial

feasibility is especially important in discussions regarding

the adoption of new waste management systems in

devel-oping countries

The triangle diagram allows the visualization of the

proximate composition of separated wastes and can

con-tribute to decision-making to improve municipal solid

waste management Any local government can apply this

type of analysis if they have data on the physical and

proximate composition of waste in their local areas

Appropriate methods for continuously recording data on

the physical and proximate composition would make the use of the triangle diagram even more reliable Periodic sampling at regular intervals must be done carefully to be representative of local wastes and result in reliable com-position data Historical data can aid in estimating a rea-sonable range of waste composition

Local governments will not be able to implement suc-cessful source separation systems without the cooperation

of their residents Although pilot-scale source separation systems have been attempted in Hangzhou in China [27], Hanoi in Vietnam [28] and Hatyai in Thailand [29], city-scale systems have rarely been established in developing countries Local governments in these countries have to develop effective strategies to involve residents in the source separation systems not simply by importing systems that have already been applied in developed countries, but

by taking into consideration local factors such as customs, economic conditions, culture and religion

Acknowledgments We sincerely thank Nguyen Huu Dung of the Institute for Urban Environment and Industry of Vietnam and all the staff of the International Cooperation Department, Hanoi Urban Environment Company for supporting this study We express our sincere and profound gratitude to the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund by the Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan.

References

1 Memon MA (2010) Integrated solid waste management based on the 3R approach J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 12:30–40

2 Cleary J (2009) Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature Environ Int 35:1256–1266

3 Winkler J, Bilitewski B (2007) Comparative evaluation of life cycle assessment models for solid waste management Waste Manag 27:1021–1031

4 McDogall F, White P, Franke M, Hindle P (2001) Integrated solid waste management: a life cycle inventory, 2nd edn Blackwell Science, Oxford

5 Liamsanguan C, Gheewala SH (2008) The holistic impact of integrated solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions

in Phuket J Clean Prod 16:1865–1871

6 Khoo HH, Lim TZ, Tan RBH (2010) Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective Sci Total Environ 408:1367–1373

7 Bai R, Sutanto M (2002) The practice and challenges of solid waste management in Singapore Waste Manag 22:557–567

8 Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (2012) Bangkok State of the environment 2010–2011 Bangkok Metropolitan Adminis-tration, Bangkok

9 Kathirvale S, Yunus MNM, Sopian K, Samsuddin AH (2003) Energy potential from municipal solid waste in Malaysia Renew Energ 29:559–567

10 Pasang H, Moore GA, Sitorus G (2007) Neighbourhood-based waste management: a solution for solid waste problems in Jakarta, Indonesia Waste Manag 27:1924–1938

11 Muttamara S, Visvanathan C, Alwis KU (1994) Solid waste recycling and reuse in Bangkok Waste Manag Res 12:151–163

Trang 10

12 Nithikul J, Karthikeyan OP, Visvanathan C (2011) Reject

man-agement from a mechanical biological treatment plant in

Bang-kok, Thailand Resour Conserv Recy 55:417–422

13 Damanhuri E, Wahyu IM, Ramang R, Padmi T (2009) Evaluation

of municipal solid waste flow in the Bandung metropolitan area,

Indonesia J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 11:270–276

14 Shekdar AV (2009) Sustainable solid waste management: an

integrated approach for Asian countries Waste Manag

29:1438–1448

15 Thanh NP, Matsui Y, Fujiwara T (2010) Household solid waste

generation and characteristic in a Mekong Delta city, Vietnam.

J Environ Manag 91:2307–2321

16 Troschinetz AM, Mihelcic JR (2009) Sustainable recycling of

municipal solid waste in developing countries Waste Manag

29:915–923

17 Wilson DC, Rodic L, Scheinberg A, Velis CA, Alabaster G

(2012) Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20

cities Waste Manag Res 30:237–254

18 Aye L, Widjaya ER (2006) Environmental and economic

analy-ses of waste disposal options for traditional markets in Indonesia.

Waste Manag 26:1180–1191

19 Chaya W, Gheewala S (2007) Life cycle assessment of

MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand J Clean Prod 15:1463–1468

20 Gunamantha M, Sarto (2012) Life cycle assessment of municipal

solid waste treatment to energy options: case study of

Kart-amantul region, Yogyakarta Renew Energ 41:277–284

21 Hanoi Statistical Office (2011) Hanoi statistical yearbook 2010 Hanoi Statistical Office, Hanoi

22 Kawai K, Osako M (2011) Estimation of recyclable waste flows in Hanoi, Vietnam (in Japanese) Environ Sanit Eng Res 25:21–29

23 Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan (1977) Protocol of waste analysis, Notification of Kansei 95th (in Japanese) Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, Tokyo

24 World Bank (1999) Municipal solid waste incineration, World Bank technical guidance report World Bank, Washington, DC

25 Tanaka N, Matsuto T, Kakuta Y, Tojo Y (2003) Fundamental knowledge of waste management engineering for recycling and appropriate disposal (in Japanese) Ghihodoshuppan, Tokyo

26 Jakobsen ST (1995) Aerobic decomposition of organic wastes 2 Value of compost as a fertilizer Resour Conserv Recy 13:57–71

27 Zhuang Y, Wu SW, Wang YL, Wu WX, Chen YX (2008) Source separation of household waste: a case study in China Waste Manag 28:2022–2030

28 Japan International Cooperation Agency, Yachiyo Engineering Co., Ltd, Nippon Koei Co., Ltd (2009) Project completion report

of the project for implementation support for 3R initiative in Hanoi city to contribute to the development of a sound material-cycle Society in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam Japan Inter-national Cooperation Agency, Tokyo

29 Charuvichaipong C, Sajor E (2006) Promoting waste separation for recycling and local governance in Thailand Habitat Int 30:579–594

Ngày đăng: 22/11/2019, 10:00

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm