UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY International School of Business DO THI THANH THAO 22140045 ROLE AMBIGUITY BETWEEN THE SALES AND PLANNING INVESTMENT DEPARTMENTS IN PHU LONG
Trang 1UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY
International School of Business
DO THI THANH THAO
22140045
ROLE AMBIGUITY BETWEEN THE SALES AND PLANNING
INVESTMENT DEPARTMENTS
IN PHU LONG REAL ESTATES CORPORATION
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
SUPERVISOR: DR NGUYEN PHONG NGUYEN
Ho Chi Minh City, February 2017
Trang 2CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM INDENTIFICATION 5
1.1 Introduction about The Company and the potential problem 5
1.2 Select the central problem 13
CHAPTER 2: PROBLEM JUSTIFICATION 15
2.2 Justify the existence of the problem 15
2.3 Justify the importance of the problem 17
2.3.1 Interpersonal Tension 17
2.3.2 Low Job Satisfaction 18
2.3.3 Low Job Performance 20
2.3.4 Extreme Behavior 21
2.3.5 Propensity to leave 22
2.3.6 Opportunism 23
CHAPTER 3: CAUSE VALIDATION 25
3.1 Potential causes of problem 25
3.1.1 Vague Task 25
3.1.2 Restrictions on Employee’s Authority 25
3.1.3 Size and complexity of organization 26
3.1.4 Task Interdependence, Rules and Policies 27
3.2 Cause Validation 29
3.2.1 Justify the links between the potential causes and the central problem 29
3.2.2 Evaluate the relative importance of the real causes 31
3.2.2 Eliminate irrelevant causes 31
CHAPTER 4: SOLUTION 33
4.1 Alternative solutions 33
4.1.1 Clarify task before implementing a project by job description for each team and each team member 33
4.1.2 Increasing the effectiveness of teamwork quality through communication, coordination, balance of member contributions, mutual support, effort, cohesion 33
Trang 34.2 Solution Evaluation 36
4.3 Action Plan 37
CHAPTER 5: SUPPORTING INFORMATION 41
5.1 Interview transcript 41
5.1.1 Problem Identification 41
5.1.2 The existence of problem 44
5.1.3 Justify the importance of problem 47
REFERENCES 53
Trang 4LIST OF TABLE
Table 1.1 The report of appraisal for applying ISO 9001:2015 9
Table 1.2 Processes underlying coordination 12
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 3.1 The cause-effect map 27
Figure 4.1 The Teamwork Quality Construct 37
Trang 5EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This research is to find out what problems are affecting on role ambiguity between Sales and Planning Investment Depts in Phu Long Real Estate Corporation The data from in-depth interviews with managers in Human Resources, Planning Investment and Sales Depts and employees in Planning Investment, Sales, Finance & Accounting and Human Resources Depts was used in this thesis Besides the report of DNV Organization taking assessment ISO 9001:2015, the research found out that lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment Departments is the effect of role ambiguity between these two parts Next, in deeper analyze of the potential causes of the problem, the researcher found that Vague task, Size and Complexity of Organization, Task, Interdependences, Rules and Policies are root causes leading to effectiveness of Sales Strategic Team as well as the turnover of company Forwards, the paper suggested solutions relating to reduce role ambiguity between Sales and Planning Investment Depts in order to increase the
coordination of them as well as to improve the turnover in Sales as well as to meet the requirement of Sales Plan in Phu Long Corp Finally, the action plan with detailed steps was presented to implement this strategy
Trang 6CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM INDENTIFICATION
1.1 Introduction about The Company and the potential problem
Introduction about The Company
Phu Long Real Estate Corporation was established in 2005 with charter capital: 700 billion of Vietnamese Dong It is one of the leading real estate developers in Ho Chi Minh City and the owner of 65-ha Dragon City in Nha Be District - the urban area
development The company has also developed and are operating other properties and projects in Vietnam including HD office Tower, Abacus office in District 1, Ho Chi Minh City; Saigon Sovico Phu Quoc 205 ha in Phu Quoc Island, one mixed - use project in City Center of Ha Noi
Full name : Công ty Cổ phần Địa ốc Phú Long
English name : Phu Long Real Estate Corporation
Head office : 41 Nguyen Van Linh Street, My Hung 2 Quarter, Tan Phong Ward, District 7, Ho Chi Minh City
The company’s investment principle is to create sustainable value added for
users/buyers They always focus on details and build properties from user’s view, from planning & design, construction to property management Its products are designed and built with care and devotion, for instance: Kim Long Villas, Ngan Long Villas, Dragon Hill Residence and Suites, Dragon Parc Villas, PVGas office Tower, which brings not only high quality buildings but also an efficiency and optimal living community
Trang 7Problem Identification
It cannot be denied that real estate market in Ho Chi Minh City has been heating up recently in generally and particularly at the south of Saigon This is not only a chance developing the projects in the south but also the challenging in this field for Phu Long Corp
According to CBRE (1) - the world’s largest commercial real estate services and investment firm, it stated that:
The demand for Saigon South has been growing as a commercial hub with quality office and commercial developments such as Crescent Plaza (home to ANZ bank), Broadway Office Park (home to IKEA’s sourcing operations) and other major multinationals have relocated to Saigon South as a an affordable location to the traditional downtown areas of Districts 1 and 3 it is no surprise that demand for Saigon South has been growing as a commercial hub with quality office and
commercial developments such as Crescent Plaza (home to ANZ bank), Broadway Office Park (home to IKEA’s sourcing operations) and other major multinationals have relocated to Saigon South as a an affordable location to the traditional
downtown areas of Districts 1 and 3 (1)
Based on the propensity to develop in Saigon South, Phu Long Corp is proud of being a many-year-experience real estate developer in this place With 10 years for
development, Phu Long Corp has been completing organizational structure for survival in this field as well as competing with strong competitors “The higher the environment variability and the uncertainty consequently experienced, the more the prevailing
Trang 8structure of organization should be adaptive, with role open to continual redefinition and with co-ordination being achieved by frequent meetings and considerable lateral
communication” (2,p362) Obviously, besides the sources such as finance, experience,
personnel, the continuous improvement of organizational structure in Phu Long Corp is also very essential For instance, Phu Long Corp used standards to demonstrate the
ability to consistently provide products and services that meet customer and regulatory
requirement through applying ISO 9001:2015 - a quality management system revision, in
2016 According to the report of appraisal professors in Table 1.1, there are the existing problems in company about: lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment Depts in selling goods, lack of the process control in construction site and lack of risk
analysis in quality management All of three problems have been singled out as of
particularly importance It is different to make a deep analysis for each issue
Site Name
Focus Area Process/Area/
Department
Standard Clause DNV
GL Auditors Initials
PHU LONG,
41 Nguye
n Van Linh Street (D2-19,
My Hung 2 Quarter ),Tan Phong Ward, District 7,HCM City,- ,+84,Vi
et Nam
Investment Department, Sales Department
ISO 9001:2015
ISO 9001:2
015 7.5
VNQ
Trang 9There is no control process
risk-PHU LONG,
41 Nguye
n Van Linh Street (D2-19,
My Hung 2 Quarter ),Tan Phong Ward, District 7,HCM City,- ,+84,Vi
et Nam
Management
ISO 9001:2015
ISO 9001:2
015 6.1
The regulation of material for projects is more clearly For example: the uPVC pipe for water systems should be standardized and examine strictly
PHU LONG,
41 Nguye
n Van Linh Street (D2-19,
My Hung 2 Quarter ),Tan Phong Ward, District 7,HCM City,- ,+84,Vi
et Nam
Effectiveness
of service &
production process monitoring activities
Project Department
ISO 9001:2015
ISO 9001:2
015 8.5.1
TANAN
Table 1.1: The report of appraisal for applying ISO 9001:2015
Source: Human Resources Department of Phu Long Real Estate Corporation
The first mentioned issue is lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment
Depts It is not a quite strange for the company Particularly, doing this research is easier
when it is supported by Human Resources Part as well as two related Parts The second
one is lack of process control in construction site However, this is the issue which is
associated with construction so that it takes too much time to do research and solve this
Trang 10problem The last one is lack of risk analysis in quality management Listing and
management risk are necessary activities to prevent risk in future But considering the urgency, lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment is the most essential which needs to be resolved in order to achieve a better operational result
Lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment Depts., according to
information of Mr Tran Van Tai – a manager of Human Resources Dept stated: “This is
no clear job of each department: Sales and Planning Departments; hence there is no clear responsibility for any person and to lay blame on each other” Malone et al
(3,p362) also revealed: “If there is no interdependence, there is nothing to coordinate”
He also mentioned about three (3) kinds of interdependence: “prerequisite, shared
resources, simultaneity Prerequisite is output of one activity which is required by the next of activity Shared resource is resource required by multiple activities Simultaneity
is time at which more than one activity must occur (3,p363)” Or interdependence is the degree of influence on the others’ performance when one member of a team has to face with his task (4) Because of the effects of their performances on the others, members in Sales Strategic Team in Phu Long Corp might do the jobs for their members who cannot meet deadline, said Mr Tai In some situations, the delivery was not in time as they committed He also supposed that was the consequence of unserious reward, discipline and penalties system For the recent 2 years (2015-2016), the result after each Sales Strategy was less than the target of Sales Strategic Team 21,4%, 27,5% respectively Therefore, it really influences on the financial performance of company
Trang 11Malone et al (3) preferred that the processes underlying coordination included 4 stages as Table 1.2 First, the coordination is “identifying goals, ordering activities,
assigning activities to actors, allocating resources, synchronizing activities”(3,p365) Second, group decision-making is “proposing alternatives, making choice (by authority, consensus, voting…)” (3,p365) Third, communication is “establishing common
languages, selecting receiver (routing), transporting message (delivering)”(3,p365) Finally, perception of common objects is “seeing same physical objects, assessing shared databases”(3,p365) According to Ms Tran Thi Minh Thuy is a team leader with 7
working years in Sales Department, she said: “In sales strategic team, the final result
usually is not on time For some reasons, one job in a chain will be delayed makes the process of all jobs are slower” On the other hand, “between Sales and Planning
Investment Parts, they seldom met each other to interact, share the information They just communicated via email, phone because of work The relationship between them may become cursory” - Mr Nguyen Liem Chinh – an expert in Planning Investment Dept
revealed Definitely, communication among them has not created a “common language” (5, p365) that is a language which is described the likeness of members in a team
Therefore, all the activities which are not the act of managing interdependencies and performed to achieve a goal is not the cooperation (3) Through the interviews, it can be found that the cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment Depts is not enough durable They implemented their tasks which were lack of interdependencies between them Moreover, they could not create a harmonious flow in cooperation because of
Trang 12shortening the stages of coordination processes Therefore, lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investment Depts existed in Phu Long Real Estate Corporation
Coordination Goals, activities, actors, resources,
interdependencies
identifying goals, ordering activities, assigning activities to actors, allocating resources, synchronizing activities Group decision-
making
goals, actors, alternatives, evaluations, choices
proposing alternatives, evaluating alternatives, making choices (e.g., by authority, consensus, or voting) Communication senders, receivers, messages,
languages
establishing common languages, selecting receiver (routing), transporting messages (delivering)
Perception of
common objectives
actors, objects seeing same physical objects,
assessing shared databases
Table 1.2: Processes underlying coordination
Source: Malone et al (3,p365)
According to Tubre et al (6), lack of communication among teams or team
members can result in contradictory information that contributes role ambiguity
Furthermore, role ambiguity creates an extent of cooperation “existent or inefficient”
among teams or team members (6,p157) Carson et al (7) also stated that role ambiguity and cooperation have a negative effect The ambiguous in roles or responsibilities seems reduce incentives for cooperation According to Mr Yen – an employee in Planning
Investments Team, there were unclear assigned tasks in Planning Investment Department Some work relating to other parts, especially they would conduct some work of Sales
Team Although this work was not his role because of his superior direction There is
Trang 13unclear expectation from superiors; thus the subordinates do not what their
responsibilities are Especially, because of no compensation for the extra work, one finds
unmotivated for this job He also stated: “Sales Departments is afraid of us implementing
all working relating to them If we finished this work well, my department will have the valid in company In contrast, their current role will be lost in company Because of this though, I feel uncomfortable in cooperating with them” According to the issue which
Planning Investments Team shared above, this problem is unclear rule between two departments
On the other hand, lack of cooperation in Phu Long Corp is caused by lack of trust among team members or teams, particularly unconditional trust According to
Jones et al (8), trust can lead to cooperative behavior in organization, particularly,
unconditional trust When trust is unconditional, people want to cooperate for shared values and reciprocated feelings, not for indebtedness (8) According to Mr Nguyen Liem Chinh, he felt uncertain about what he was doing and what he would achieve in his work Therefore, he often felt stress and unsatisfied with his job Furthermore, Ms Do Xuan Hoai also revealed that she felt untrusted in her supervisor Although she tried to work hard; she could be not recognized high-value For instance, two managers of Sales and Planning Investment Depts could not cooperated together because everyone had the own think and not trust in each other The lack of cooperation could lead to not match work of each member
The last one is leader behavior According to Cremer et al (9), two leadership
features related to the leaders’ ability to promote group belongingness: procedural
Trang 14fairness and charismatic leadership The leaders may induce cooperation through
fostering positive within-group relations When an employee receives a positive social evaluation (respect, belongingness); fair treatment may motivate him engage in group-orientation behavior such as being conducive of cooperation (10) On the other hand, cooperation is created by charismatic leadership fostering a sense of group
belongingness Baetz et al (11) stated that charismatic leadership may appeal to group members’ motives, aspirations as well as to create motivation for staff These leader behaviors induce the splice of a vision as well as making personal sacrifices to realize the vision According to Mr Vo Duy Minh, he knew that the assigning of work was not suitable and not be clear However, he had to implement until he felt uninterested in work He could not do anymore because it was a mechanism of company
1.2 Select the central problem
Based on the analyzed information and potential problems, lack of cooperation between Sales and Planning Investments Departments comes from lack of trust among team members or team, particularly, unconditional trust; leader behaviors and the role ambiguity between Sales and Planning Investment Depts
Firstly, the trust of each individual to his team or colleagues requires the long time
to practice The development of trust is a function belonging an organization’s ability over time (8) Whether does the organizational culture endorse and encourage the
expression of the values underlying trust or not? Although significant advantages may obtain from the indication of unconditional trust, it takes time, effort, and considerable
Trang 15resources to build and maintain unconditional trust (8) Thus, in order to enhance
unconditional trust among team members in Sales Strategic Team of Phu Long Corp, it takes too many resources which are not appropriate in this situation
Second, leader behavior is one of the potential problems creating lack of
cooperation This issue is one of emotional problem which is hard to solve in the
organizations It depends on the managerial system which is determined by the head of company With the limit of resources, this paper cannot solve this issue immediately
Third, role ambiguity makes employees unclear about their job objectives When
employee feels dissatisfied with work, low job performance is a certain thing; and job performance may be influenced In addition, this issue is supported by Human Resource Manager Thus, it is suitable to explore and find out the solution in order to reduce role ambiguity between Sales and Planning Depts
Therefore, this paper focuses on role ambiguity as a central problem of lack of cooperative behavior
Trang 16CHAPTER 2: PROBLEM JUSTIFICATION
2.2 Justify the existence of the problem
It is very important to understand the meaning of “role” Role reflects a person’s position including rights, duties, power and responsibilities (12) Role ambiguity is
defined as an overlap of roles, rights and responsibilities among the positions (12)
Moreover, Schuler referred that role ambiguity was lack of clarification in the sent role as well as lack of “role expectations and the degree of uncertainty regarding the outcomes of one’s role performance” (13,p114)
According to Mr Chinh – an expert in Planning Investment Dept said that he could not do a lot of work well while he covered his responsibilities and some work from the others His responsibilities were not clear; hence, his work could be not recognized and rewarded Mr Duy – a manger of Planning Investment Department also stipulated that to get more work for the other made his part did overtime However, he was ready to do for the common objective And this might rely on the subjective appraisal of boss
Ambiguous in responsibilities is also a problem of a PR employee within a Sales
Strategic team “I find so hard to work while I am not recognized my ability My
responsibilities are really not clear and just shared from my superior”, she said
Role ambiguity, on the other hand, according to the chain-of-command principle organizations is lack of setting up the hierarchical relationships with a clear and single flow of authority from the top to the bottom (14) Roy et el (13) stipulated that role
ambiguity was as a single or multiple roles that confronted the role incumbent, which might be not clear behaviors or performance roles An experimental study of Smith (16)
Trang 17was performed by 140 college students in order to measure the effects of role ambiguity The result of research concluded three issues First of all is that the performance of
groups being asked to solve problem without clarification of the role each member were less effective than when the roles were instructed clearly The second one is that role ambiguity significantly decreased group satisfaction And the last one is that the hostility level was markedly higher for group under conditions of role ambiguity than role
clarification (16) According to Rizzo et al (5), every position had a specific task as well
as responsibilities such as duties, role requirements with providing guidance and
direction He also stated that conversely, if an employee didn’t know what he has the authority to do and how he could do to get the achievement or what the achievement he had to obtain, he couldn’t perform what was unavailable measurement scale to judge his result These made him hesitate in making decisions or not meet the requirement or
expectation of his superior (5)
In addition, the questionnaire including fourteen (14) questions was designed and sent to ten (10) employees in Sales Strategic Team Company including Sales and
Planning Investment Departments to examine the existence of role ambiguity There were ten (10) surveys were returned with answers It meant that the response rate accounted for roughly 100% of total surveys The respondents were asked to indicate their degree of agreement or disagreement for each item in this section A five point scale will be used with 1 = "strongly agree" to 5 = "strongly disagree" to measure for each question In short, the mean rate was approximately 3.2 and it demonstrated that the level of role
Trang 18ambiguity at Sales Strategic Team in Phu Long Corporation is higher than the average rate (2.5)
2.3 Justify the importance of the problem
According to Rizzo et al (5), ambiguity might increase his satisfaction with his role, being anxiety, distorting reality, and certainly would lead to perform less effectively Roy
et al (15) conducted a research on the relation of role ambiguity to member satisfaction and performance The study indicated that there was a high association between role ambiguity with tension, anxiety, fear and hostility, low job satisfaction, and loss of self-confidence as well as lower productivity often Ambiguous task from superior created an anxious feeling or less favorable attitude for superior as well as reduced productivity One of the appreciated and important characteristics of a good will manager was the ability to give his subordinates clear guidance Therefore, role ambiguity makes
employees less effective in performing their task which is relating to their obligations (17)
2.3.1 Interpersonal Tension
According to Nyanga et al (12), role ambiguity is the key reason of interpersonal tension Caldwell (18), Friedson (19), Lust (20) and Schuler (13) stipulated that when employees didn’t know what was expected to do for their tasks, misunderstanding could increase among them and might lead to tensions because of corroding the cooperation among them In fact, Sales Manager of company felt not comfortable when her work could be implemented by the others who wouldn’t know clearly about a flexible
combination among sales strategy, sales competition, persuading customer, etc… When
Trang 19her responsibility will be done by the others, she wondered was her performance in work not good? These thought made her feel stress and unsecured about my job
Face to the action of Sales Department, Planning Investment Department found difficult in cooperation with them Manager of Planning Investment Department also shared that the more assigned task which they got from Sales Department made function
of his department weaker because of less time for incumbent job Furthermore, he didn’t find the clearly objective from the extra work How can he be judged what they were done by superiors? Certainly, there was a confused feeling from the unclear work, he said
According to Nyanga (12), when employee’s task was executed by the other, this is also the result of low self-image Role ambiguity influences on the employees feeling not self-confident for failing to perform as expected because what they were done probably had been finished by their colleagues There are the professional and personal conflicts because of overlapping, intertwining in work In addition, interpersonal conflict was one
of the major sources of stress (12) “Stress was very detrimental to the physical and mental health of an employee, hence such clashes should be avoided at all costs”
(12,p299) Therefore, unless the intense is solved, psychological work of employees in two departments would be getting worse
2.3.2 Low Job Satisfaction
According to Smith (21), there were five dimensions combining to job satisfaction: work satisfaction, satisfaction with colleagues, satisfaction with supervisors, satisfaction with salary and satisfaction with getting promotion Regarding to Keller’s research (22),
Trang 20role ambiguity had a high negative impact on job satisfaction A staff in Planning
Investment Department shared: “Sales Team might feel unhappy with me when I must
cover some new works from their department When I got more work not including my responsibility, I did not only spend time for another job, but I also received scolding from
my superior sometimes Because superior assigned work to my department, so that we must do Really, we feel unhappy with temporary works which might make me lose my objective, even though lose promotion opportunities” Therefore, role ambiguity as a lack
of unclear job duties, rights and authority created job dissatisfaction (23) Roy (15), Rizzo (5), House (24), Hamner (25), Sell (26), Stout (27), Fang (28) and Cordes (29) also demonstrated that job ambiguity is one of key factors to lead to job dissatisfaction Other
information from staff of Sales Team, she said: “There was no job assignment for
instruction all members of two working team and clearly responsibilities in some
necessary cases We had many times to cooperation together but it got hard We
recognized that when there were some problems, who would be in charge of those works? Finally, employees who were enthusiasm with work were not only got award but also received complain from boss After that we worked under pressure and uncomfortable situation” Obviously, role ambiguity, the lack of clear and specific information regarding
work role requirements, has also been linked repeatedly with job stress
In addition, to test the consequences of role ambiguity: job satisfaction Based on the scales item of House et al (24), ten (10) surveys were returned with answers The results of correspondents contributed the evidences for the existence of job satisfaction in
Trang 21Phu Long Corp Therefore, role ambiguity is one of factors creating low job satisfaction
in Phu Long Corp
2.3.3 Low Job Performance
According to Nyanga (12), role ambiguity did not only create low job satisfaction but also had a negative relation with performance and productivity Role ambiguity creates employee lose interest in her job and develops a negative attitude towards it Consequently, affectivity in work has a down trend (30) Nyanga (12) showed that when
an employee received too much unclear demands, he may panic and take pressure that his performance and productivity in work decreased He also alluded that the subordinates who received more work reduced the level of concentration on their task performance Certainly, they take a lot of time to be caution with new work Tubre and Collins (6) also revealed that an organization is the system of role which relies on the interaction of members, role ambiguity could have negative consequences on organizational
performance Role ambiguity effects on cognitive and motivational process (31) Because
of role ambiguity as a lack of knowledge of the most effective job behaviors, conflicting information, the individual is unable to do everything that is expected For the cognitive extent, role ambiguity results a low level of job performance for lack of information For the motivational perspective, role ambiguity tends to weaken effort-to-performance and performance-to-reward expectancies According to Walk (32), job performance is
recognized as employee outcomes, success, and financial performance of organizations When interviewed a staff in Planning Investment, he revealed that he was enthusiasm in cooperating with Sales team at first When he was made low-face in front of other
Trang 22partners in some cases, he has no more desired for his contributing on Sales aspects On his part, he just did what he was assigned from superior carefully Because of
participating in Sales team, he might interrupt their authorities Being careful helped him
to avoid unwanted cases happening According to a subordinate working for in Planning
Investment also shared: “Our department becomes to be passive situation which make me
not interested in work anymore”
2.3.4 Extreme Behavior
Role ambiguity effects on both organization and individuals (12) Luo et al (14) also recognized that disorders in psychological dysfunctions such as stress, depression, conflict and low morale caused by role ambiguity Moreover, Macey (32) proposed that unwanted work behavior appeared in work environment were absenteeism and deviant behavior Turning to Mr Yen – a staff of Planning Investment Dept., he honestly shared:
“I’m a legal expert so that my responsibility is controlled by the legalization of
documents Besides, my new task received from superior was building sales policy as well as contributing sales campaign for the whole project of company Therefore,
whether I wanted or not, I had to fulfill this task However, Sales Department might think that I interfered in their work; they thus felt unhappy with me They began reacting with
me in work For instance, Sales manager suggested me moving my working place to Sales office Obviously, this was an unreasonable suggestion It seems to be the retaliation for interjecting their work When the conflict was highest, he attempted to protect my opinion and not moving another place To be honest, I felt disappointed with this and wanted to quit the job at that time After that, I often arrived to office late and come back early I
Trang 23haven’t found interested in work instead of a positive position attitude I even though don’t want to go to work every morning after getting up This is the reason why I’m often absent at work”
2.3.5 Propensity to leave
Bedeian (33) indicated that the development from low job satisfaction to extreme
behavior would lead to the result on job engagement of employees as staying or leaving decision in a company The last major influence of role ambiguity is propensity to leave
of employees (33,p423) According to Roy (15), Rizzo (5), House (24), Hamner (25), Sell (26), Stout (27), Fang (28) and Cordes (29), they also comment that role ambiguity had significant effects on employee attitude which were dissatisfaction and propensity to leave in the company In addition, when role ambiguity is intense, employees would have trend to find alternative situations which are less uncomfortable (2) According to data of the Human Resource Department, the number of employee leaving job has increased significantly (i.e 19% in 2013; 26,4% in 2014; 27,5% in 2015 and 31,5% in the period of six first month ) In comparison with the average turnover rate in real estate field (i.e around 21,6% in 2015), the turnover rate of Phu Long Corp was higher than that The figures showed that the turnover rate rose by 4% in the first six months of 2016 From
2013 until now, the staff turnover rate has been on up trend and has the sign of
continuous increase next time
Mr Duy – manager of Planning Investment Department also shared: “My
department has some problem recently Receiving too much works makes our function weak For instance, we took too much time to solve the problems for other department;
Trang 24although our function is to promote project investment Finally, our department had not met the requirement in employee appraisal of company Obviously, it’s hard to get the promotion without achievement I saw many seniors of my departments quit their job to find new opportunities for promotion Recently, my manager who has worked for
company in 8 years, decided to leave company for new chance Every staff knows that sooner or later the inevitable happens He had devoted so much to the company but he had never got the promotion in for 8 years Role ambiguity caused him never obtained significant accomplishment as expected”
2.3.6 Opportunism
Opportunism is defined as a self-interest seeking a strategy (7) Regarding Carson (7), ambiguity rises the opportunities for parties or individual to shirk, cheat, or being opportunism The phenomenon of opportunism is a system of behaviors including
shirking, failing to fulfill obligations, and withholding valuable information Role
ambiguity, thus increase the negative effects on organizational performance, especially in Sale Strategic Team According to Mr Yen – an employee in Planning Investment
revealed that some work belonging to Sales team which Planning Investment Dept must
to do For example, in setting up plan for selling product, Sales Team does not take care for this process This work is often conducted by Planning Investment Team Therefore, there is no commitment for the target sales It is a reason for the changing sales policy in order to take the advantages for them Mr Chinh also agreed with his colleague’s idea t
Trang 25is clear to know this problem, but no one comment it because of their self-interest However, this effects on the other relating issues
Trang 26CHAPTER 3: CAUSE VALIDATION
3.1 Potential causes of problem
3.1.1 Vague Task
Nyanga (12) revealed that vague task was a key factor which stimulated the role ambiguity He also stated when different person’s roles would be implemented at the same time, he performed unclear dual or multiple roles in definition or structure (12) Role incumbent, thus, became uncertain in what the expectation was from him in that role Furthermore, because ambiguous tasks were often closely interrelated, intertwined and difficult employees’ role, it’s hard to define separate them (34) Unclearly defined task performance objectives, lack of clarity of purpose, goals for both teams and
individuals would control in leaving the job incumbents to receive what was expected to
do from superiors (12) Certainly, ambiguous tasks would happen In fact, according to
Mr Yen in Planning Investment Department indicated: “Task performance of my
department which was drafted by Human Resource and General Director’s approval was not clear When some work done by Sales Department had not completed, the superiors asked him to do for them Or in some cases when we needed to cooperate in order to finished some products, it took a long time to wait for Sales team finishing To fulfill the task, my leader directed us to do for them Really, we didn’t find interested when
receiving more work.”
3.1.2 Restrictions on Employee’s Authority
Nyanga (12) supposed that in the enterprises being self-managed and self-directed work teams where would give their employees the jurisdiction to make decisions in their
Trang 27areas However, the liberalisation of rights and responsibilities will lead to role ambiguity (12) Boles (35) also argued that an employee couldn’t know how much authority and responsibility of her in self-directed team There was no clarity and separation defined in this team In Phu Long Corp., there is cooperation between two teams in drafting new sales policy when the company launches a new project Therefore, according to a sales administrator, some related members would join in a group During that time, they often had some meeting to finalize the policy Instead of having work responsibilities table for each member and measurement to appraise performance of each member, some
employees covered too much while the others only contributed generally
3.1.3 Size and complexity of organization
The organizational complexity is a strong factor of role ambiguity (12) According
to Quah (36) viewed that large companies had a wide range of positions which were intertwined, overlapping and duplications of responsibilities “In Phu Long Corp., in order to decrease operation cost, each staff could be required some jobs by superior The working environment was not really professional Therefore, an employee could
undertake a part of work of the others”, Manager of Human Resource Department said
He also revealed that the company needed a Sales Director who could know clearly about market and finance to manage and make Sales Department stronger In addition, the other
in Planning Investment Department also shared: “we know that the company utilizes human resource for different objectives of company However, some work is not suitable for employees who receive that work”
Trang 283.1.4 Task Interdependence, Rules and Policies
Task interdependences is also viewed as a stipulator of role ambiguity (12) Russel (37) indicated that task interdependence was created from co-operating and working interactively of team members One’s performance was influenced on others’
performance as well as performance chain of task Thus, when bad performance of a group or team would be not good and didn’t do its part, the others would leave their job incumbents in order to be prior work for avoiding breaking performance chain
Unknowingly, role ambiguity was inevitable (12) According to above expert in Planning Investment said: “In order to fulfill the common task, our department had to work as demand of boss for Sales Team Because my manager was such a kind person of
comeliness; therefore, he didn’t want to debate for right or wrong issue He just wanted to complete the objective well However, this makes our department disappointed”