thạc sỹ, luận văn, ngoại ngữ, tiếng anh, khóa luận, chuyên đề
Trang 1Appendix questionnaire Phần 1: Anh (chị) vui lòng cho biết ý kiến của mình về các tiêu chí đánh giá của phiếu dự giờ giáo viên đang đợc sử dụng trên địa bàn thành phố Hà Nội Anh chị khoanh tròn vào
đáp án đúng.
1 Phần nội dung (6điểm)
A Rất cụ thể B Cụ thể C Trìu tợng D Rất trìu tuợng
2 Phần phơng pháp (4 diểm)
A Rất cụ thể B Cụ thể C Trìu tợng D Rất trìu tợng
3 Phần Phơng tiện (4 điểm)
A A Rất cụ thể B Cụ thể C Trìu tợng D Rất trìu tợng
4 Phần Tổ chức (4 điểm)
A Rất khách quan B Khách quan C Chủ quan D.Rất chủ quan
5 Phần kết quả (2 điểm)
A Rất khách quan B Khách quan C Chủ quan D.Rất chủ quan
Phần 2: Nhận xét về tiêu chí đánh giá
1 Các tiêu chí đánh giá khuyến khích đợc giáo viên đổi mới phơng pháp giảng dạy
A Rất đồng ý B.Đồng ý C Không đồng ý D Rất không đồng ý
2 Các tiêu chí đánh giá rất rõ ràng mang tính khách quan cao.
A Rất đồng ý B.Đồng ý C Không đồng ý D Rất không đồng ý
3 Số điểm giữa các phần của 5 tiêu chí đánh giá rất cân đối.
A Rất đồng ý B.Đồng ý C Không đồng ý D Rất không đồng ý
4 Tính khách quan trong việc đánh giá giờ dạy của giáo viên thông qua 2 ngời dự giờ
A Rất khách quan B Khách quan C Chủ quan D.Rất chủ quan
Phần 3: ý kiến đóng góp cho bản đánh giá.
1 Anh (chị) cho biết 3 điểm mạnh của các tiêu chí đánh giá giáo viên
-2 1 Anh (chị) cho biết 3 điểm yếu của các tiêu chí đánh giá giáo viên
-3 Theo anh (chị) để đánh giá chính xác và khuyến khích giáo viên đổi mới phơng pháp, cần có những cải tiến gì trong các tiêu chí đánh giá
-4 Theo anh (chị) có cần đa thêm tiêu chí đánh giá nào nữa không? Có cần thay đổi biểu điểm của tiêu chí đánh giá nào không?
Anh (chị) vui lòng ghi thêm vào
Trang 2HANOI DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
SOCIAL REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence – Freedom – Happiness
Date Month Year 200
TEACHING ASSESSMENT SHEET
Teacher :……… Class :……… School: ………
Subject :………Lesson: … ……
Observer: ………Title : ………
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
Content (6 points)
1 Precise and scientific (the science of the subject and political attitudes; viewpoints)
(2 points)
2 Systematic, adequate, focused (2 points)
3 Reality related (if yes), educational (2 points)
Methods (4 points)
4 Use of appropriate methods to the subject, the teaching content and the lesson to be
taught (2 points)
5 Good combination of methods in all teaching and learning activities (2 points)
Facilities (4 points)
6 Good combination of teaching facilities and equipment well and adequately with the
content of the lesson (2 points)
7 Reasonable board presentation, clear handwriting and drawings, clear and standard
speech; adequate lesson plan (2 points)
Planning (4 points)
8 Flexible organization of all stages and processes, reasonable time distribution in all
stages and processes (2 points)
9 Organization and control of positive and active learning of students, appropriate for
the content of the lesson and all students, good motivation of students’ learning (2
points)
Results (2 points)
10 Most students understand and master the focus of the lesson; how to apply the
knowledge into real situations (2 points)
LESSON RANKING: OBSERVER
(signature)
Good: From 17-20 points; criteria 1,4,6,9 must get 2 points
Fair: From 13-16,5 points; criteria 1,4, 9 must get 2 points
Average: From 10-12,5 points; criteria 1,4 must get 2 points
Weak: Total points are 10 points
SCORE
TOTAL
Trang 3British Council – English Language Teacher Training English Language Teacher Training
(1998-2003) - Director: Psyche Kennett
Observation sheet
Grade: Number of students: Aim:
Before the lesson – preparation
Clarity, usefulness and
understanding of the lesson plan
excellent very
good
good average poor
- The plan is easy to understand and follow
- the objectives are clear and achievable
- there is an awareness of student problems
- the teacher understands and can explain the plan
- the lesson plan shows a good understanding of
the methodology
During the lesson – teaching and learning
Teaching the lesson excellent very
good
good average poor
- The teacher starts the lesson clearly
- The teacher uses the lesson plan appropriately
- The teacher uses a good balance of English and
Vietnamese
- There are clear stages to the lesson
- the activities used are successful
- the timing of the activities is appropriate
- there is a variety of activities
- the teacher uses a variety of media e.g
blackboard, other visuals etc
- the teacher uses a variety of questioning
strategies
- the teacher uses several techniques to deal with
errors
Management and control of the class excellent very
good
good average poor
- instructions are clear and understood
- the teacher monitors the class
- the teacher responds to students
- the teacher’s voice level is loud enough
-The teacher maintains eye contact with the class
- the teacher uses a variety of work arrangements
- the teacher elicits from the students
Student learning and involvement excellent very
good
good average poor
Trang 4- the teacher establishes a rapport with the
students
- the teacher involves the students and keeps them
interested
- There is a good balance of teacher talking time
and student talking time
- the teacher encourages and praises
- the teacher considers the feelings of the students
Teacher’s manner and use of English excellent very
good
good average poor
- The teacher seems relaxed and confident
- The teacher establishes and rapport with the
students
- the teacher is flexible/ adaptable
- the teacher’s English is a good model
- the teacher can use English naturally e.g can
answer students’ (unexpected) questions
After the lesson-teacher’s awareness and feedback from others
Teacher’s own assessment of the lesson Things I’d do different next time
Comments from the trainer Good points
Enter grades in boxes
- Grade: 5=Excellent 4=very good 3=good 2=average 1=poor
Final grade:
Trang 5Teacher Observation and Evaluation Criteria Criterion 1 Instructional Skills- The teacher demonstrates, in his or her performance, a competent level of knowledge and skill in designing and conducting an instructional experience
Indicators:
- Writes and teaches to clear objectives – Utilizes principles of learning – Provides a variety of instructional experiences
- Uses appropriate instructional strategies for students, subject, and goals – Monitors ongoing performances to adjust lessons
- Uses District goals and guide effectively – Demonstrates creativity in the teaching process
Criterion II Classroom management and organization – The teacher demonstrates, in his or her performance, a competent level of knowledge and skill in organizing the physical and human elements in the educational setting
Indicators:
- Provides aclassroom climate conductive to learning
- Provides a model in demeanor and appearance that does not detract from teaching effectiveness
- Assess individual differences, provides appropriate student grouping and uses appropriate instructional resources to meet individual needs
- Involves students in planning and evaluating their own work where appropriate
Criterion III Student discipline and attendant problems – The teacher demonstrates the ability to manage the non-instructional human dynamics in the educational setting
Indicators:
- Communicates clearly established parameters - Recognizes conditions that lead to problems – Assist students toward self-discipline
- Responds reasonably to discipline problems – Effectvely utilizes the assistance of administrators or support personnel
Criterion IV Knowledge or suject matter – The teacher demonstrates a depth and breadth of knowledge of theory and content in general education and subject matters specialization(s) appropriate to the grade level
Indicators:
Trang 6- Gives evidence of subject matter competency in area(s) to be taught
- Recognizes the relationship between one’s subject matter field and other disciplines or subjects
- Keeps abreast of new developments in the subject matter area
Criterion V Interest in teaching pupils – The teacher demonstrates an understanding of and commiment to each pupil , taking into account each individual’s unique background and characteristics The teacher demonstrates enthusiasm for or enjoyment in work with pupils
Indicators:
- Plans educational experiences based on student unique background and characteristics
- Enjoys working with students
- Provide prompt, meaningful communication among parents
Criterion VI Preparation and scholaship – The teacher exhibits, in his or her performance, evidence of having a theoretical background and knowledge of the principles and methods of teaching and commitment to education as profession
Indicators:
- Keeps abreast of current and effective emerging principles of teaching
- Contributes to school and professionalism
- Maintains professional rapport with colleagues, parents, and community
Criterion VII Effort toward improvement when needed – The teacher demonstrates an awareness of his or her limitations and strengths and demonstrates continued professional growth
Indicators:
- Participates in Career Development
- Utilizes self-evaluation as a tool for professional growth
- Responds constructively to recommendations
Criterion VIII Assi\umes responsibility for district, guilding, and classroom obligations
Indicators:
- Classroom obligations
- School Obligations
- District Obligations
Trang 7section 9 Evaluating and Document Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Form
Teacher’s Name: Date:
Directions: CircleY (yes) if the statement is always or usually true
Circle N (no) if the statement is never or seldom true
In multiple choice statement, check (v) the appropriate space.
1 The objectives for this lesson were clear to me Y N
2 This teacher speaks clearly
3 This teacher explains things clearly
4 This teacher is stimulating and interesting to listen to
5 The material presented was well organized
6 This teacher assumes the students know more than they
actually do
7 This teacher seems to understand the subject matter
8 This teacher encourages participation
9 This teacher’s explanations are
A _ too technical
B _ too simplified
C _ satisfactory
10 Time spent on lecturing:
A _ too much
B _ too little
C _ satisfactory
11 The class (under this teacher) was paced:
A _ too fast
B _ too slow
C _ satisfactory
Overall Evaluation:
1 Outstanding features of this teacher’s teaching:
2 Weakness in this teacher’s teaching:
Suggestions for improvement: