Abstract The amount of excess sludge produced in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Japan is increasing every year as the urban population increases. Phosphorus in excess sludge could be a potential phosphorus resource since at present, phosphate rock is being exhausted all over the world. Every year, Japan imports large quantities of phosphorus from abroad but much are discharged as excess sludge. Therefore, solubilization process, one method of recovering phosphorus from sludge, could be a promising solution. In this study, subcritical water process, a new technology that solubilizes sludge under subcritical condition, was applied before the phosphorus in sludge was recovered with magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) process. As a result, the solubilization rate of excess sludge achieved approximately 80% and about 94-97% of the phosphorus could be recovered
Trang 1Resource Recovery from Excess Sludge by Subcritical Water Process with Magnesium Ammonium Phosphate Process
Mitsuhiro Arakane 1,Tsuyoshi Imai 1,Sadaaki Murakami 2,Masami Takeuchi 2
Masao Ukita 1,Masahiko Sekine 1 and Takaya Higuchi 1
1
Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yamaguchi University
2
Dept of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Ube National College of Technology
Abstract The amount of excess sludge produced in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Japan is increasing every year as the urban population increases Phosphorus in excess sludge could be a potential phosphorus resource since at present, phosphate rock is being exhausted all over the world Every year, Japan imports large quantities of phosphorus from abroad but much are discharged as excess sludge Therefore, solubilization process, one method of recovering phosphorus from sludge, could be a promising solution In this study, subcritical water process, a new technology that solubilizes sludge under subcritical condition, was applied before the phosphorus in sludge was recovered with magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) process As a result, the solubilization rate of excess sludge achieved approximately 80% and about 94-97% of the phosphorus could be recovered
Keywords Subcritical water; Solubilization; Excess sludge; Resources recovery; MAP process
Introduction
Activated sludge (AS) process is the most commonly used biological treatment process for municipal wastewater treatment plants all over the world However, one of its major disadvantages is the high production of excess sludge Every year about 2000 million tons of excess sludge are to be treated in Japan, accounting for approximately 48 % of the total amount
of industrial solid waste, and this number is still increasing with the increase in urban population (Environmental white paper, 2005) Although recently, excess sludge is being increasingly used for soil amendment or construction materials, this part takes only about 45 % of the total, and the residual part has to be dewatered, incinerated and then landfilled Because the area for landfill is becoming less and less available in Japan, new treatment methods and disposal technologies, as well as effective utilization, are strongly expected In this study, a new method
of applying subcritical water to hydrolyze and solubilize excess sludge, as shown in Figure 1,
was examined In addition, UASB process for methane recovery and MAP process for nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from the solubilized excess sludge were also investigated
Subcritical water
Figure 2 shows the three-phase (solid, liquid and gas, including critical point) diagram of water
and its saturated vapor pressure curve Subcritical reaction occurs at temperatures and pressures below the critical point, i.e., 374.2oC and 22.1 MPa One of the most outstanding characteristics
of subcritical reaction is that it has great hydrolysis function (Yamasaki, 1998) which generally takes place in acidic and alkaline catalytic reaction according to the target materials (Daimon, 2001), and therefore can solubilize the solid phase to liquid phase (Shimizu, 2000) Subcritical reaction was applied in this research primarily due to the following reasons: (1) hydrolysis and solubilization of excess sludge using subcritical water can be much easier and more efficient (Imai et al., 2003); and, (2) near the critical point, resource recovery might be impeded because
of the gasification and pyrolysis during the transformation from sludge to low molecular weight materials, but this would not happen in the subcritical process (Okuda et al., 2001)
Trang 2Treated water
Excess Sludge Wastewater
Subcritical water process
Solubilized sludge
Influent
Effluent
Methane gas
Anaerobic treatment process
Aerobic treatment process
MAP process
MAP recovery
Sludge solubilization
by subcritical water
Wastewater treatment
by bacteria Methane recovery by methane fermentation
Phosphate recovery
on crystallization
Figure 1 Flowchart of sludge-reducing wastewater treatment process combined with resource recovery
374 22
T em perature(℃)
G as
S olid
Liquid
C ritical point
S upercritical area
S ubcritical area
S aturated vapor pressure curve
Figure 2 Three-phase diagram and saturated vapor pressure curve of water
Mechanism of sludge solubilization
Various organic components of sludge are decomposed (mainly hydrolyzed) and oxidized during subcritical reactions (Goto, 1997; Shimizu, 2000), resulting to low molecular weight degradation products, such as sugars, amino acids, fatty acids, orthophosphoric acid and ammonia nitrogen Hence, subcritical reaction, with or without the use of oxidants, is capable of decomposing the organic and inorganic solid fractions of sludge and producing highly concentrated liquid of solubilized sludge
Outline of MAP process
In this study, MAP (magnesium ammonium phosphate) process was used for the recovery of phosphate as orthophosphoric acid, and ammonia nitrogen This process is strongly pH-dependent with an optimal pH value of 9 (K.Demeestere, 2001) Next to the pH value, the initial
Trang 3ammonium concentration and the molar ratio NH4+/Mg2+/PO43- also greatly affect the precipitation efficiency An advantage of MAP process is that the cost could be reduced drastically by combining NH4+ and PO43- in liquid phases (Kato, 2003) The chemical reaction in MAP process is as follows
NH4+ + Mg2+ + PO43- = NH4Mg2PO4 (1)
Materials and Methods
Preparation of excess sludge
The excess sludge used in this study was collected from the laboratory-scale experimental apparatus (10 L) and was thickened to 26,000 mg MLSS/L
Experimental apparatus
The experimental apparatus applied in this study is shown in Figure 3 The reactor was
preheated for 30 minutes until the temperature reached a certain value The sludge was then treated with subcritical water for 60 minutes while the temperature was kept constant After the reaction, the reactor was cooled down to room temperature for 30 minutes, and the solubilized sludge was filtered The filtrate was then sent to the following MAP process after adjusting its
pH to 9 with Mg(OH)2 The influence of the phosphate recovery rate on the amount of precipitate formed in MAP process was investigated
Temperature control
Timer
heating cooling Safty
valve
Injection pipe
Release valve Reactor
Pressure gauge
Shaker
Agitation ball
Tank
Figure 3 Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus
Moreover, solubilization rate was calculated using equation (2)
Solubilization rate (%)=100* (a-b)/a (2)
Here, a represents the MLSS content before treatment while b represents the MLSS content after treatment
Phosphorus recovery rate, on the other hand, was calculated using equation (3)
Phosphorus recovery rate (%) =100* (d-c)/d (3) Here, c is the concentration of soluble phosphate after MAP process while d is the concentration
of soluble phosphate before MAP process
Trang 4Analytical parameters
In this study, suspended solid (SS), ammonia nitrogen and orthophosphate were analyzed according to the sewage standard test methods (Standard method, 1992)
Results and Discussion
Figure 4 shows the variation of solubilization rate at different treatment temperatures The
solubilization rate showed evident increases up to approximately 80% until the treatment temperature achieved 225 oC After that, the rate was almost constant as the temperature was further raised to 350 oC These phenomena suggested that the solid organic materials existing in sludge were solubilized into the liquid phase, and when the temperature increased further to 350
oC, part of them was gasified although they were still under subcritical conditions
In Figure 5, it is apparent that the recovery rate of phosphate increased gradually as the
temperature increased to 180 oC, kept constant at about 95% from 180 to 240 oC, and dropped as the temperature kept on increasing This implies that, varieties of orthophosphate were produced
as intermediate products during the temperature increment After treatment, the major component in MLSS was maybe changed to be a char in which orthophosphate was contained Some other researchers also found that the refractory intermediates were produced in subcritical and supercritical water process (Lee et al., 1990) As a result, MAP process could recover about
95 % of the phosphate from the solubilized excess sludge
0 20 40 60 80 100
Temperature(℃)
Figure 4 Variation of solubilization rate with treatment temperature
0 20 40 60 80 100
Temperature(℃)
Figure 5 Variation of phosphate recovery rate with treatment temperature
The phosphorus mass balance was determined on the basis of the input and output of MAP
Trang 5process Basic information needed for the mass balance calculation for MAP process included
the following items, as schematically shown in Figure 6: (1) phosphorus contained in the
residual solids (residual phosphorus), (2) phosphorus recovered from the MAP process (crystallized phosphate; MAP), and (3) phosphate unrecovered (soluble phosphate in the effluent)
Phosphorus recovered from soluble phosphate
Subcritical water process
Solids-liquid separation
by filter
MAP process
Phosphorus solubilized from sludge
Residual phosphorus
Crystallized phosphate
Soluble phosphate
Effluent phosphate
(MAP)
Phosphate unrecovered from soluble phosphate
Phosphorus contained with residual solids
Figure 6 Flowchart of phosphorus recovery process
Variations of phosphorus composition in MAP process at different temperatures are shown in
Figure 7 At temperatures lower than 100 oC, the solubilization reaction was very few so a
greater part of the phosphate could not be separated from the sludge From Figure 7 it can be
clearly seen that the effluent phosphate decreased gradually as the treatment temperature increased to 200 oC, and kept constant at about 0% from 200 to 340 oC In the case of crystallized phosphate, it dropped to 80 % at temperatures higher than 240 oC This might be due
to the orthophosphate decrease caused by accumulation into refractory organics
0 20 40 60 80 100
Effluent phosphate Crystallized phosphate
Temperature(℃)
340
(MAP)
Figure 7 Variation of phosphorus composition with treatment temperature
Trang 6Conclusions
Solubilization of sludge using subcritical water offers versatile and technically viable sludge concept Subcritical water process can be used to achieve a considerable degree of decomposition of the complex components derived from the sludge It also offers opportunities for combining efficient solubilization of sludge with the revovery of useful matter, especially phosphate, which can be recycled and used to support the wastewater treatment plants This study concluded that about 80% of the excess sludge could be solubilized with subcritical water process when the temperature ranged from 200 oC to 250 oC In addition, MAP process could be
a promising process for phosphorus recovery (95 %) from the solubilized excess sludge
Reference
Daimon H., Kang K., Sato N., Fujie K (2001) Development of marine waste recycling technologies using sub- and
supercritical water: Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, Vol.34, No.9, pp.1091-1096
Environmental white paper 2004
Goto M., Nada T., Kawajiri S., Kodama A., Hirose T (1997) Decomposition of municipal sludge by supercritical
water oxidation: J Chem Eng Jpn, Vol.30, No.5, pp.813-818
Imai T., Fukuda T., Ukita M., Sekine M., Higuchi T., Murakami S (2003) Resource recovery from sewage sludge
by subcritical water oxidation process: Environmental Engineering Research, Vol.40, pp.405-414
K.Demeestere, E.Smet, H.Van Langenhove and Z.Galbacs (2001) Optimalisation of Magnesium Ammonium
Phosphate Precipitation and its Applicability to the Removal of Ammonium: Environmental Technology,
Vol.22, pp.1419-1428
Kato F., Oshita K., Takaoka M., Takeda N (2003) Evaluation of Phosphorus recovery from wastewater treatment
system: Environ Sanit Eng Res, Vol.17, No.3, pp.70-75
Lee, D.-S., E F Gloyna and L.Li (1990) Efficiency of H 2 O 2 and O 2 in Supercritical Water Oxidation of 2,4-
Dichlorophenol and Acetic Acid; J Supercritical Fluids, No.3, pp.249-255
Okuda T., Kosaki Y., Murakami S., Kasahara S., Ishikawa M (2001) Study on the volume reduction system of
excess sludge by hydrothermal reaction: Journal of Environmental Systems and Engineering, No.692/
VII-21, pp.21-30
Shimizu Y., SHANABLEH A (2000) Treatment of sewage sludge using hydrothermal oxidation Technology
application challenges: Water Sci Technol, Vol.41, No.8, pp.85-92
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (1992) 18th edition, American public health
association, Washington, D.C
Yamasaki N (1998) Recycling possibilities of organic waste by hydrothermal process: Sekiyu Gakkaishi, Vol.41,
No.3, pp.175-181.