ABSTRACT The Odaiba Marine Park is a typical sightseeing place that represents Tokyo. But unfortunately the Odaiba Marine Park is not in comfortable condition for the people dabbling in seawater, because of the increase of fecal coliforms due to the CSO (Combined Sewer Overflow) system after heavy rain. Tokyo Metropolitan Government started the ocean area purification experiment with EBARA Corporation. The filtration and the ultraviolet ray disinfection were adopted for the seawater purification process. The purification zone in the Odaiba Marine Park was partitioned with two oil fences, and the water from the purification plant was continuously drained off, at 5,000m3/day for three consecutive months. The purified seawater was discharged from July to October in 2003. Moreover, the effectiveness of photoreactivation, seen as the most challenging task when adopting disinfection by ultraviolet ray, is reported as the preliminary study conducted in 2002. The model tests, using seawater mixed with untreated sewage resulted in either a lower photoreactivation rate of the coliform groups, or further inactivation of the groups. This suggests that the coliform groups of the freshwater-origin are affected by salt density in the seawater with inhibition of the photoreactivation.
Trang 1Seawater Purification Experiment and Consideration about Photoreactivation of
Coliforms in the Inside of Seawater
R HATA*1, K SASAKI*2, K TSUTSUMI*3, M AKATSU*4
*1 Engineering Department, Municipal Water Works Division, Ebara Corp 1-6-27 Kohnan
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8480, JAPAN (E-mail: hata.ryosuke@ebara.com)
*2 Applied Chemistry Lab., Ebara Research Corp.4-2-1 Honfujisawa, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa
251-8502, JAPAN (E-mail: sasaki.kenichi@er.ebara.com)
*3 Engineering Department, Municipal Water Works Division, Ebara Corp 4-2-1 Honfujisawa,
Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa 251-8502, JAPAN (E-mail: tsutsumi.kaori@ebara.com)
*4 Engineering Department, Municipal Water Works Division, Ebara Corp 1-6-27 Kohnan
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8480, JAPAN (E-mail: akatsu.miki@ebara.com)
ABSTRACT
The Odaiba Marine Park is a typical sightseeing place that represents Tokyo But unfortunately the Odaiba Marine Park is not in comfortable condition for the people dabbling in seawater, because of the increase of fecal coliforms due to the CSO (Combined Sewer Overflow) system after heavy rain
Tokyo Metropolitan Government started the ocean area purification experiment with EBARA Corporation The filtration and the ultraviolet ray disinfection were adopted for the seawater purification process
The purification zone in the Odaiba Marine Park was partitioned with two oil fences, and the water from the purification plant was continuously drained off, at 5,000m3/day for three consecutive months
The purified seawater was discharged from July to October in 2003
Moreover, the effectiveness of photoreactivation, seen as the most challenging task when adopting disinfection by ultraviolet ray, is reported as the preliminary study conducted in 2002 The model tests, using seawater mixed with untreated sewage resulted in either a lower photoreactivation rate of the coliform groups, or further inactivation of the groups
This suggests that the coliform groups of the freshwater-origin are affected by salt density in the seawater with inhibition of the photoreactivation
KEYWORDS
Combined Sewer Overflow, ocean area purification, ultraviolet rays disinfection, photoreactivation
1 INTRODUCTION
Odaiba Marine Park is one of few sandy beaches in the Tokyo Metropolitan area, welcoming many visitors and children to play in the water during summer The Park, however, is not in a preferred condition for those people, due to chronic appearance of red tide from spring to summer Also, the deterioration of the water quality is observed after a heavy rain due to influence of sewage effluents Tokyo Metropolitan Government (Bureaus of Environment, Port and Harbor, and Sewerage) and Ebara Corporation have been jointly conducting an experimental research of sea area purification of
3 year, since 2003 The sea area purification experiment was performed in a partition of Odaiba Marine Park and the effect of the purification has been investigated In the year of 2003, purified seawater discharge and investigation were conducted from July, 18 to October, 31 in total amount
of 106 days
One partition of the sea area of Odaiba Marine Park was elaborated as a target for purification experiment and silt fence was used to define the boundary of this purification zone
Filtration and ultraviolet ray disinfection was adopted as the purification method In a purification plant that was build neighboring the Ariake West Canal and distancing 1 km to the Odaiba Marine Park, seawater was filtrated to increase the UV ray transmittance and coliform groups were inactivated by a medium pressure UV lamps This purified seawater was pumped at a rate of
Trang 2Sea bathing water quality standard was taken as reference to establish the target values for the
experiment The target values in the purification zone were set as follow: fecal coliforms low than
10count/100mL and CODMn low than 5mg/L The target treatment value for the purification plant
was set as follows: inactivation rate of fecal coliforms higher than 99.99% or less than
10count/100mL and CODMn low than 5 mg/L
Additionally, a tendency that the number of microorganisms was found to decrease after the
photoreactivation is reported here This is a result of photoreactivation experiment conducted as
preliminary tests of UV disinfection performed in the year 2002
2 METHODS
2-1 Seawater purification experiment
Figure 1 shows the overall configuration
of the purification facility
Seawater was purified in a plant located
in the Ariake Water Reclamation Center,
Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau of Sewerage
The purified seawater was supplied from
the purification plant at a flow rate of
5,000 m3/day to the purification zone
distancing 1 km in Odaiba Marine Park
The purification zone consists of a
partition of approximately 7,000 m2 in area (approx 10,000 m3 in volume)
The basic flow for the treatment method was filtration+disinfection The filtration facility is
composed by biofilters, in which the SS-CODMn is decreased by the SS removal and D-CODMn is
decreased by the biological treatment effects; resulting in the improvement of UV transmittance
through the seawater and reduction of fecal coliforms counts The facility adopted for the
disinfection was the ultraviolet ray that has less impact to the ecosystem Specifications of the
purification equipment and the UV disinfector are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
The target water qualities in the purification plant and the purification zone are shown in Tables 3
and 4, respectively The target values for water quality were selected taking as a reference the "sea
bathing water quality standard" established by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan The water
quality rank [A], was selected for all items with exception of CODMn, in which rank [B] was
adopted Please, note that the highest rank for water quality is [AA] followed by [A] and [B]
Overall
tower in parallel
Filtration
device
using
Calculation parameters
No of UV
lamps
6 lamps × 2 blocks
UV
disinfector
Inactivation rate (%)
For 12-lamp configuration
99.9990 99.9998
*D10 represents the UV dose required for 90% inactivation (i.e log (survival rate) of -1).
備 Filtra
Purification plant
Odaiba Marine Park
Figure 1 Facility configuration
Trang 3Table 3 Target water quality in the purification plant
Table 4 Target water quality in the purification zone
Figure 2 shows the flowchart of the seawater purification plant
Seawater was supplied from the Ariake West Canal and a 30mm open mesh net was used in the
sluice gate to prevent the drawing of eventual garbage and jellyfishes Additionally, a 2mm open
mesh screen was provided on the inflow side of the primary seawater tank
After filtrated, the seawater was aerated in the filtrated seawater tank increasing the DO level before
discharging Therefore, the oxygen deficiency was avoided in the seawater at purification zone
Figures 3 and 4 show the top view and cross-section view of the purification zone at Odaiba Marine
Park Inside the park, the purified seawater is delivered to the purification zone by a water pipe
buried under the beach and is gradually poured out from perforated discharge pipes laid under the
sea bottom The purification zone was sectioned with a double fence structure consisting of
dropping and raising curtain oil fences The fences are "silt fences," which are used for offshore
works, each having curtains that allow the passage of water, but avoid the passage of turbid particles
Water quality investigations were conducted by sampling seawater at points indicated with green X
marks in Fig 3 (three points inside and one point outside of the purification zone)
Figure 2 Flowchart of seawater purification plant
U V
Ariake West Canal
Primary seawater tank
Filtration equipment
× 2
Filtrated seawater tank
(Air)
Ultraviolet disinfector
Odaiba Marine Park Purified
seawater tank
Ariake WWTP.
Primary seawater tank Backwashed
water tank Screen
送水管
自立式オイルフェンス
垂下式オイルフェンス
LWL HWL
平均 水位
放流管
管理室
70m
送水管
自立式オイルフェンス
垂下式オイルフェンス
LWL HWL
平均 水位
放流管
管理室
70m
Dropping curtain oil fence Raising curtain oil fence
Laying-under-the-ground discharge pipe
Care house
Average tide Water pipe
Trang 42-2 Preliminary photoreactivation test
The present investigation performed between October and November, 2003 was conducted as preliminary test of seawater purification Here, the behaviors of fecal coliforms that outflow by CSO were studied Test water samples were made collecting seawater from the canal and mixing with 0.5 to 1.6% of raw sewage Raw sewage was obtained from the Ariake Water Reclamation Center The samples were UV-treated (25 to 39 mJ/cm2), using a compact test device with medium-pressure UV lamps For the following photoreactivation treatment; the UV-treated samples were enclosed in sterilized glass petri dishes, 50 mm in internal diameter and 15 mm in depth, with quartz caps They were immediately placed outdoors and left there for one to two hours, subject to sunlight of 27,000 to 57,000 LUX Then, the number of coliforms and fecal coliforms in the samples were counted
3 RESULTS
3-1 Seawater purification experiment
Since the summer of 2003 was cooler than the usual, water temperature was kept low in general and raw water quality deterioration due to the red tides was not observed too much The occurrence of CSO by the rain was sporadically seen, but as the filtration facility removed almost 80% of the coliforms, UV disinfector could be operated with a sufficient margin of reserve in overall
Table 5 summarizes the calculated UV dose of the disinfector, based on the UV transmittance of influent seawater (filtered seawater), during the experimental period Although the twelve UV lamps originally installed were reduced to six on September 1, the UV dose become excessive along the experimental period
Table 5 UV dose from the UV disinfector
Table 6 lists the average values of water quality during the experimental period at: the raw water colleted at Ariake West Canal, purification plant discharge, three points inside and one point outside of the purification zone at Odaiba Marine Park Figure 5 shows the profile of coliforms and fecal coliforms count in the raw water, filtered water and purified seawater during the experimental period
Figure 4 Purification zone cross section
LWL HWL
70m
送水管 オイルフェンス
LWL HWL
70m
送水管 オイルフェンス
Oil fence
Curtain Discharge pipe Crushed stone
Water pipe
Trang 5Table 6 Water qualities in and out of the experimental zone (Ave during the experiment)
Transparency [deg.]
Turbidity [deg.]
SS [mg/L]
Coliforms count
Fecal coliforms count
*) Coliforms and fecal coliforms were not detected in the purified seawater during the whole experimental period
As a result of investigation of water quality in the purification plant, the coliforms and fecal coliforms was not detected in the purified seawater, and the UV disinfection was found to be sufficient for inactivation Referring to CODMn , the low values found in the raw water quality during the experimental period also contributed and the targets values set in Table 3 for the purification plant was practically achieved
Referring to the result of the water quality in the purification zone, if we compare the number of fecal coliforms (75%value) inside and outside the purification zone, inside the purification zone was 217 counts/100mL against 730counts/100mL outside the purification zone Furthermore, if we look to the profile of fecal coliforms, the number of fecal coliforms clearly increased after the rain due to the influence of CSO The influence of CSO occurred predominantly after the rain rather than during the rain and depending on the rainfall conditions, this influence to the water quality was hold for several days
If we compare the recovery tendency of water quality between inside and outside of the purification zone, clear tendency for fast recovery inside the purification zone was observed From these results,
we can conclude that the purification facility and methodology used this year allowed to achieving
a certain level of purification efficiency
However, the number of fecal coliforms (75%value) inside of purification zone was 217 counts/100mL and the values set in Table 4, 100count/100mL were not satisfied
This was found to be due to the inflow of sea water to the purification zone caused by the tides and also due to the inflow during the high tide at the end of silt fences located at the water’s edges Concerning to the seawater inflow from the edges of silt fence, a provisional wall was installed at the end of the experimental period of this year, with excellent results Such result will be surely reflected in the experimental methodology of next year
Following, the appearance frequency of each rank of sea bathing water quality standard inside of the purification zone are illustrated in Table 7 The numbers of days that could be graded as rank
“A” was 47day (44% of total days) outside against the 67days (64% of the total days) inside the purification zone The ranked days were 20 point higher inside rather than outside On the other hand, the number of days that was graded as “bathing prohibited” at inside and outside of purification zone were 11days (10%) and 21 (20%), respectively
Trang 6Table 7 Fecal coliforms count index in the sea bathing water quality standard
Bathing allowed
(A)
Allowed (B・C)
Bathing prohibited
Fecal coliforms count
(Experimental period:106 days in total)
3-2 Preliminary test of photoreactivation
The results are shown in Tables 8 and 9 The coliforms inactivation rate by UV treatment in four experiments was in the range of 99.78 to 99.96%, which is similar to the rate set in the UV treatment guideline for sewage
With photoreactivation for one to two hours after the UV treatment, the coliform groups in the
1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000
浄化海水
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
7/18 7/28 8/7 8/17 8/27 9/6 9/16 9/26 10/6 10/16 10/26
1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000
7/18 7/28 8/7 8/17 8/27 9/6 9/16 9/26 10/6
10/16 10/26
図5 降雨量とふん便性大腸菌群数の関係
Primary water Purified seawater
Filtered water
In the zone Out of the zone
Figure 5 Rainfalls vs fecal coliforms counts
Trang 7experimental run 1 and 2, in which 0.5% raw sewage was added, shows a tendency to stopping the increase of its population to 2-6 times larger than that immediately after the UV treatment In the experimental run 3, in which 1.6% of the raw sewage was added and UV irradiation was 31 mJ/cm2, the increase of population stopped at 2-5 times larger On the other hand, at the run 4, in where the
UV dose was reduced to 25 mJ/cm2, showed only a slight population growth from 240 to 270 count/100 mL This preliminary tests showed that the run 4 that has a low inactivation by UV resulted in small photoreactivation Even the run 1, in which a high inactivation by UV was achieved, resulted in a population increase of coliforms of only 6 times
The fecal coliforms showed the following tendency: undetected immediately after UV treatment and 17 count/100 mL or lower after photoreactivation in the experimental run 1 and 2 This was found to be due to the low amount of fecal coliforms in the raw water and due to the high UV inactivation rate, which was 99.8% Assuming that the amount of fecal coliforms are 4000 count/100 mL in the raw water, and the inactivation rate is 99.8%, the fecal coliforms amount after the UV treatment should be 8 count/100 mL Since, the analytical detection limit of the fecal coliforms is 17 count/100 mL; the amount increase should be within two times of the original amount, even if the photoreactivation takes place However, according to the results in the experimental run 3 and 4, the surviving fecal coliforms immediately after the UV treatment was 50 count/100 mL and after the photoreactivation the fecal coliforms could not be detected That means, the number of fecal coliforms fell below 17 count/100 mL
In this photoreactivation test; seawater was mixed with raw sewage that contains huge amount of freshwater-origin coliform groups This test showed a tendency that the coliforms from freshwater origin has a poor capacity for photoreactivation or even that the coliforms are inactivated in seawater environment The results suggest that coliform groups living in fresh water are influenced
by the salt concentration and the photoreactivation are inhibited when discharged in seawater
Table 8 Photoreactivation test results (coliforms)
Coliform groups MPN/100 mL Run Raw sewage
added amount
(%)
Date UV dose
(mJ/cm 2 )
Raw water
Disinfected seawater
Inactivation rate (%)
Disinfected seawater, photoreactivated for 1 hr
Disinfected seawater, photoreactivated for 2 hr
4 1.6 2002.11.19 25.0 110000 240 99.78 240 270
Table 9 Photoreactivation test results (fecal coliforms)
Fecal coliform groups CFU/100 mL Run Raw sewage
added amount
(%)
Date UV dose
(mJ/cm 2 )
Raw water
Disinfected seawater
Inactivation rate (%)
Disinfected seawater, photoreactivated for 1 hr
Disinfected seawater, photoreactivated for 2 hr
1 0.5 2002.10.10 38.8 4000 <17 >99.58 <17 <17
2 0.5 2002.10.10 31.1 4000 <17 >99.58 <17 <17
3 1.6 2002.11.19 31.2 23000 50 99.78 <17 <17
4 1.6 2002.11.19 25.0 23000 50 99.78 <17 <17
4 CONCLUSION
Concerning to the performance of seawater purification plant, the number of coliforms and fecal coliforms were always under the detection limit during the whole experimental period Other water quality items were also satisfactory
Referring to the results of the purification zone, during the 106 day starting from July, 18 to October, 31 2003, as the result of seawater purification and discharge of 5000m3 per day, the water
Trang 8purification zone, the peaks in the number of the fecal coliforms after the occurrence of CSO were lower rather than outside, and a faster tendency for recovery was observed
Concerning to the results of preliminary experiments of photoreactivation, the sewage coliforms of fresh-water origin, when UV disinfected in seawater environment followed by photoreactivation, do not demonstrated a outstanding photoreactivation effect such as usually observed in effluents of sewage treatment The fecal coliforms, in particular, showed a tendency to be inactivated by the photoreactivation process
5 TASKS IN FUTURE
Concerning to the seawater purification plant, the UV irradiation dose was found to be excessive in this experiment, once the removal rate of coliforms could be kept at high values at the filtration facility, even with water quality deterioration Additionally, there was a considerable difference in the number of coliform groups between the occurrence of CSO and fine weather when CSO do not affects Therefore, keeping the UV irradiation dose constant can result in unnecessary electric power consumption Optimal irradiation dose according to the water quality should be found out and a control system for the irradiation dose should be still established
Referring to the purification zone, in view to satisfy the water quality target for longer periods; improvement of the device to prevent the water infiltration from the edges of silt fences; experiment with purified seawater discharge increased to 7,5000m3 per day; and water flow investigation to clarify the movements and retentions situation of purified sea water will be carry out
Concerning to the tendency found out in the preliminary experiment of photoreactivation; test in the seawater with occurrence of CSO will be continued and clarification of the influence of photoreactivation on the sea area with inflow water from the CSO and sewage treatment effluents are being planned In addition, in view to understand the causes of the suppression of photoreactivation of coliform groups in seawater, we will investigate the behavior of the coliform groups upon photoreactivation/dark field activation condition by conducting model experiments with artificial seawater Investigation of bacterial flora change should also be conducted to understand the influence to the coliform groups from domestic wastewater when discharged into the seawater environment
6 REFERENCES
1) T.Nakazato(2004) Water21, June 2004.pp 42-43