Wastewater biofilms are very complex multispecies biofilms, displaying considerable heterogeneity with respect to both the microorganisms present and their physicochemical microenvironments. To understand the eco-physiology of individual microorganisms in the biofilm, techniques and tools with a high spatial and temporal resolution are required for direct detection of the spatial distributions of microbial species and their activities in minimally disturbed their natural habitats (e.g., biofilms). In this paper, we will, therefore, address the great potential of the combined use of the current FISH technique and microelectrodes to study the microbial ecology of complex microbial communities such as biofilms. The combination of these two techniques will provide reliable and direct information about relationships between in situ microbial activity and the occurrence of specific microorganisms in biofilms. As an example of the combined study, we will illustrate the in situ spatial organization of ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria on fine scale in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms by applying the full-cycle of 16S rRNA approach followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is linked to their in situ activity distributions at a similar resolution determined by use of microelectrodes. The combination of these techniques allows relating in situ microbial activity directly to occurrence of nitrifying bacteria population.
Trang 1ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND
IN SITU ACTIVITY OF NITRIFYING BIOFILMS Satoshi Okabe*, Hisashi Satoh**, Tsukasa Ito*, and Yoshimasa Watanabe*
*Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North-13, West-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0813, JAPAN
E-mail: sokabe@eng.hokudai.ac.jp
** Department of Civil Engineering, Hachinohe Institute of Technology, Hachinohe, Aomori 031-8501, Japan
E-mail:mailto:qsatoh@hi-tech.ac.jp
ABSTRACT
Wastewater biofilms are very complex multispecies biofilms, displaying considerable heterogeneity with respect to both the microorganisms present and their physicochemical microenvironments To understand the eco-physiology
of individual microorganisms in the biofilm, techniques and tools with a high spatial and temporal resolution are required for direct detection of the spatial distributions of microbial species and their activities in minimally disturbed their natural habitats (e.g., biofilms) In this paper, we will, therefore, address the great potential of the combined use of the current FISH technique and microelectrodes to study the microbial ecology of complex microbial communities such as biofilms The combination of these two techniques will provide reliable and direct
information about relationships between in situ microbial activity and the occurrence of specific microorganisms
in biofilms As an example of the combined study, we will illustrate the in situ spatial organization of
ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria on fine scale in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms by applying the
full-cycle of 16S rRNA approach followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is linked to their in
situ activity distributions at a similar resolution determined by use of microelectrodes The combination of these
techniques allows relating in situ microbial activity directly to occurrence of nitrifying bacteria population
KEYWORDS : Nitrifying biofilms, 16S rDNA-cloning analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH),
microsensors, nitrification, population dynamics
INTRODUCTION
In wastewater treatment bioreactors, microorganisms are present and active in biofilms and aggregates Besides conventional culture dependent techniques, modern molecular biological techniques have been used to study the diversity and ecology of microorganisms in wastewater treatment processes since the mid-1980s Since that time many new insights into aerobic and anaerobic microbial wastewater treatment processes have been gained, which significantly expanded our understandings of process design and control Based on fundamental knowledge of microbial community composition and the metabolic properties of microorganisms, wastewater treatment systems must be developed and operated to maximize microbial activities Further insights into the factors affecting structure and function of mixed microbial communities in bioreactors are essential for advancing wastewater treatment
Although microbial nitrification processes for nitrogen removal are becoming more important due to strict regulations on nitrogen discharge, nitrification is recognized as being difficult to maintain in wastewater treatment systems Since the diverse nitrifying bacterial populations are expected to be present in wastewater biofilms, different species of NH4+- and NO2--oxidizing bacteria exhibit different in situ growth kinetics, substrate affinities,
and sensitivities to various environmental factors (e.g., pH, temperature, O2 concentration and substrate concentrations) Thus, a better understanding of microbiology, ecology, and population dynamics of nitrifying bacteria in wastewater biofilm systems is essential for improving process performance and control
Trang 2
Therefore, we investigated successional development of nitrifying bacterial community structure and in situ
nitrifying activities in biofilms when the biofilms were grown on rotating disk reactors (RDR) with domestic wastewater and a synthetic nutrient medium To achieve this goal, we have combined molecular techniques (i.e.,
16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA)-cloning analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with a set of
fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA-targeted DNA probes and microsensor measurements for NH4+, NO2-, NO3-, and
O2 The combined use of these techniques made it possible to relate in situ nitrifying activity directly to the
occurrence of nitrifying bacterial populations FISH visualized successional development of nitrifying bacterial community within an autotrophic nitrifying biofilm After reaching the steady-state condition, microprofiles of
NH4+, NO2-, NO3-, and O2 in the biofilms were measured by use of microsensors, and the spatial distributions of in
situ nitrifying activities were determined The relationship between the spatial organization of nitrifying bacterial
populations and the in situ activity of these populations within the biofilms was discussed
Microsensors
For analysis of microbial structure and function (activity) of such complex microbial communities, classical microbiological techniques like isolation and physiological characterization have limitations Therefore,
appropriate methods with sufficiently high spatial resolution are needed for (1) in situ identification, localization,
and quantification of microbial populations, (2) the determination of physicochemical microenvironment, and (3)
the measurement of their in situ activity Combination of FISH and microsensor technology became a powerful
and reliable tool during the last two decades The structure and principle of commonly used amperometric and
potentiometric microsensors are shown in Fig.1 The spatial resolution of microsensors is about two times the tip
diameter of the sensors as long as analyte consumption by the sensor is negligible and the sensor is small enough
to cause minimum disturbance The tip diameter of microsensors applied for biofilms and aggregates is about 10
µm (Fig.1), indicating the spatial resolution of about 20 µm This resolution is good enough to characterize the
concentration gradients across the biofilms, microbial mats and sediments and to calculate the net rates (areal and volumetric) of production and consumption at a certain depth or of whole microbial community During the last decade, microelectrode measurement was nicely combined with FISH to relate microbial community structure and
function of SRB (Ito et al., 2002; Kuhl and Jorgensen, 1992; Okabe et al., 1999b; Okabe et al., 2003; Ramsing et
al., 1993) and nitrifying bacteria (Gieseke et al., 2001; Okabe et al., 1999a; Okabe et al., 2001; Satoh et al., 2003;
Schramm et al., 1996; Schramm et al., 2000) in biofilms The combination of two methods allows relating in situ
microbial activity directly to occurrence of specific microorganisms within complex microbial consortia Microelectrodes, however, measure only net chemical profiles, and the spatial resolution is also above a single-cell
level To address the question of the higher abundance and activity of SRB in oxic zones of biofilms (Okabe et al., 1999b; Ito et al., 2002), for example, the resolution of microelectrode measurements is not high enough In
O 2 and H 2 S microsensors
O2-permeable silicone membrane
Cathode (Gold)
Liquid ion exchange membrane
Electrolyte (KCl) Glass
Guard cathode Reference
electrode (Ag/AgCl)
Working electrode (Pt wire)
Internal electrolyte
50 m
Working electrode (Ag/AgCl)
Charge separation of ions across a membrane
A potential difference b/w the working electrode and the reference
1) Amperometric microsensors
2) Potentiometric microsensors
pH, NO 2 - and NO 3
-microsensors
O 2 and H 2 S microsensors
O2-permeable silicone membrane
Cathode (Gold)
Liquid ion exchange membrane
Electrolyte (KCl) Glass
Guard cathode Reference
electrode (Ag/AgCl)
Working electrode (Pt wire)
Internal electrolyte
50 m
Working electrode (Ag/AgCl)
O2-permeable silicone membrane
Cathode (Gold)
Liquid ion exchange membrane
Electrolyte (KCl) Glass
Guard cathode Reference
electrode (Ag/AgCl)
Working electrode (Pt wire)
Internal electrolyte
50 m
Working electrode (Ag/AgCl)
Charge separation of ions across a membrane
A potential difference b/w the working electrode and the reference
1) Amperometric microsensors
2) Potentiometric microsensors
pH, NO 2 - and NO 3
-microsensors
Figure 1 The structure and principle of the amperometric and potentiometric (LIX) microsensors
Trang 3Environmental Samples
Cultures
PCR Products
Genetic Fingerprints Clone Libraries
Sequence Database Probes Phylogenetic Tree
Isolation
Nucleic acid extraction
RT-PCR PCR
PCR
Sequencing of clones Sequencing of individual bands
Comparative sequence analysis
Dot blot / Southern
Quantitative dot blot
Fluorescent in situ
hybridization (FISH )
Environmental Samples
Cultures
PCR Products
Genetic Fingerprints Clone Libraries
Sequence Database Probes Phylogenetic Tree
Isolation
Nucleic acid extraction
RT-PCR PCR
PCR
Sequencing of clones Sequencing of individual bands
Comparative sequence analysis
Dot blot / Southern
Quantitative dot blot
Fluorescent in situ
hybridization (FISH )
Figure 2 Flow diagram of the different steps in the full- cycle rRNA approach
addition, when the resources used by an uncultured microorganism are unknown or the abundance of the targeted microorganism is low in complex and heterogeneous habitats, the chemical profiles and fluxes cannot correlate to the abundance of the specific bacterial populations Therefore, an analytical method at a single-cell level that allows us to more directly correlate the identity (16S rRNA-based phylogeny) and specific metabolic activity of individual cells has been desired
16S rRNA Approach
Microbial community structure analysis, primarily based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing, is
becoming the most powerful tool to study nitrifying bacterial populations present in biofilm reactors (Amann et al., 1995; Head et al., 1998; Olsen et al., 1986) An overview of a microbial community analysis with 16S rRNA
approach is given in Figure 2 Nucleic acids from an environmental sample including multispecies
microorganisms are extracted, selectively amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a diverse set of primers and separated by several fingerprinting techniques including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (Muyzer and Smalla, 1998), temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) (Muyzer and Smalla, 1998),
and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms (t-RFLP) (Liu et al., 1997) The amplified 16S rRNA gene
fragments are “shotgun cloned”, and the different types of cloned rRNA genes are then sorted and are subsequently subjected to sequence analysis The retrieved sequences can be phylogenetically analyzed by comparing with existing 16S rRNA gene database and used for probe and primer designing The fingerprinting techniques can be used to monitor microbial community changes in natural environments and bioreactors Different hybridization analyses are methods to quantify and identify the RNA genes of different microbial
populations Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (Amann, 1995) is used for identification and quantification
of microbial species and to observe the spatial distribution of specific microbial populations in biofilms and aggregates This rRNA approach does not include cultivation, which circumvents the biases associated with culture-dependent techniques It must be noted that this approach enables identification and quantification of “as yet unknown and/or uncultivated microorganisms”
Trang 4EXPERIMENTAL MATERIALS AND METHODS
Biofilm Samples
Two types of biofilms, a domestic wastewater biofilm and an autotrophic nitrifying biofilm, were studied Both biofilms were cultured in partially submerged rotating disk reactors (RDR) consisting of 5 poly-methyl-methacrylate disks Eight removable slides (1×6 cm) were installed in each disk for sampling
biofilms (Okabe et al., 1996) The autotrophic nitrifying biofilms were first cultured with the primary settling tank
effluent from the Shoseigawa municipal wastewater treatment plant, Sapporo, Japan for a few days and then were cultured with synthetic nutrient The nutrient medium was composed of the followings (mM): NH4Cl, (3.6); NaHCO3, (17.8); K2HPO4, (0.03); MgSO4· 7H2O, (0.41); NaCl, (1.25); pH=7.0±0.2 The reactor volume was
1370 cm3, and total biofilm area was 2830 cm2 Temperature was maintained at 20°C Disk rotational speed was fixed at 14 rpm Dilution rate in the reactors was kept at 0.2 h-1
Nucleic Acid Extraction and PCR Amplification
Approximately, 1 g of each wet biofilm sample was mixed with 1 ml of AE buffer (20 mM sodium acetate [pH 5.5], 1 mM EDTA) in clean 15-ml tubes After ultrasonic treatment (10 min) and lysis (5 mg of lysosyme per ml for 40 min at 37°C and 2 mg of protinase K per ml for 30 at 55°C), bacterial DNA was extracted from biofilm samples by a combined freeze-thaw (three cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen and heating at 37°C), 1% (wt/vol)
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) treatment, and hot phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol treatment (Teske et al., 1996)
The 16S rRNA genes (rDNA) from mixed bacterial DNA were amplified by PCR with the primer set of CTO189f
and CTO654r as described by Kowalchuk et al (1997) For general bacteria, almost-full length bacterial 16S rDNA fragments were amplified using the primer set of GM3f (Escherichia coli 16S rDNA positions 8 to 24) and GM4r (E coli positions 1492 to 1507) as described by Muyzer et al (1995) To minimize nonspecific annealing of the primers to nontarget DNA, a hot-start and touch-down PCR program was used for all amplification (Muyzer et
al., 1997) The PCR products were evaluated on a 1 % (w/v) agarose gel
Cloning of 16S rDNA
One microliter of the amplified bacterial 16S rDNA fragments (465 bp including variable V3 region) was directly
ligated into the pGEM-T vector cloning system (Promega) and transformed into competent cells (high-efficiency E
coli JM109 [Promega]) as described in the manufacturer’s instruction
Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis
Plasmids were extracted and purified from clones with the Wizard Plus Minipreps DNA purification system (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions To avoid redundant sequencing, PCR-amplified rDNA fragments of all clones were analyzed by RFLP (Restriction fragment length polymorphism) after digestion
with restriction enzymes of cfoI or haeIII as described in the manufacturer’s instruction The PCR fragments
digested were loaded on a 2.0 % (w/v) agarose gel Similar fragment migration patterns were defined as identical recombinants, and one representative of each group of recombinants was selected for comparative sequence analysis Partial sequencing (ca 465 bp) of the 16S rDNA inserts was performed with an automatic sequencer (HITACHI) All sequences were checked for chimeric artifacts by the CHECH_CHIMERA program in the
Ribosomal Database Project (RDP)(Maidak et al., 1997) and compared with similar sequences of the reference organisms by BLAST search (Altschul et al., 1990) Sequence data were aligned with the CLUSTAL W package (Thompson et al., 1994) Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbour-joining method (Saito and Nei,
1987) with Tree Explore Bootstrap resampling analysis for 100 replicates was performed
Fixation and Cryosectioning of Biofilm Samples
Biofilm samples were taken at regular time intervals during the periods of the biofilm development The biofilm samples were fixed with freshly prepared paraformaldehyde solution (4% in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH=7.2) for 4 to 8 h at 4°C and embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN) overnight to
Trang 5infiltrate the OCT compound into the biofilm After rapid freezing at –21°C, 10 to 20-µm-thick vertical slices were cut with a cryostat (Reichert-Jung Cryocut 1800, Leica) and placed on a gelatin-coated slide (Cell-line, USA, 0.1 % gelatin and 0.01 % chromium potassium sulfate) After airdrying overnight, the slices were dehydrated by successive passage through 50, 80, and 98 % ethanol washes (for 3 min each), air dried, and stored at room temperature
Oligonucleotide Probes
The following oligonucleotide probes were used: Nso190 (Mobarry et al., 1996), NEU (Wagner et al., 1995), Nsm156 (Mobarry et al., 1996), NmV (Pommerening-Roser et al., 1996), Nsv443 (Mobarry et al., 1996), NIT2 (Wagner et al., 1996), NIT3 (Wagner et al., 1996), Ntspa454 (Hovanec et al., 1998), Ntspa685 (Hovanec et al., 1998), and Ntspa1026 (Juretschko et al., 1998) Probes were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or tetramethylrhodamine-5-isothiocyanate (TRITC) Unlabelled competitor CNIT3 (Wagner et al., 1996) and CTE (Schleifer et al., 1992) probes were added to an equimolar amount of NIT3 and NEU probes, respectively
In Situ Hybridization
The previously published optimal hybridization conditions were used for each probe All in situ hybridizations
were performed according to the procedure described by Amann (1995) in hybridization buffer (0.9 M NaCl, 20mM Tris hydrochloride (pH=7.2), 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), x% formamide) at 46°C for 2-3 hours The final probe concentration was approximately 5 ng µl-1 Subsequently, a stringent wash step was performed at 48°C for 20 min in 50 ml of pre-warmed washing solution (x mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris hydrochloride (pH=7.2), 0.01 % SDS) The stringency of the washing step (at 48°C) was adjusted by lowering the sodium chloride concentration to achieve the appropriate specificity The slides were then rinsed briefly with ddH2O and allowed to air dry Simultaneous hybridization with probes requiring different stringency was performed by a successive hybridization procedure: hybridization with the probe requiring higher stringency was performed first, and then
hybridization with the probe requiring lower stringency was performed (Wagner et al., 1994) Slides were mounted
in SlowFadeTM-light antifade kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR)
Microelectrode Preparation and Measurements
For determination of concentration profiles in the biofilms, cathode type oxygen microelectrodes with a tip diameter of about 10 µm was prepared and calibrated as described previously by Revsbech and Jorgensen (1986) Liquid ion-exchanging membrane (LIX) microsensors for NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- were prepared according to
deBeer et al (1997) The LIX microsensors were calibrated in dilution series (10-3-10-6 M) of NH4+, NO2-, and
NO3- in the medium used for the measurements All measurements were performed as described previously (deBeer and Heuvel, 1988) in a flow cell reactor at 20°C, with an average liquid velocity of 2-3 cm s-1 by blowing air on the liquid surface The composition of the medium used for microprofile measurements was described
previously by deBeer et al (1993) The biofilm samples taken from the reactor was acclimated in the medium a
few hours before the measurement, to ensure that steady state profiles were obtained
Estimation of Consumption and Production Rate Profiles
Net specific consumption and production rates (R; µmol cm-3 h-1) of NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- were estimated from the
measured microprofiles by using the Fick's second law of diffusion as previously described by Lorenzen et al
(1998) Molecular diffusion coefficients of 1.38×10-5 cm2 s-1 for NH4+, 1.23×10-5 cm2 s-1 for NO2-, and 1.23×
10-5 cm2 s-1 for NO3- at 20°C were used for the calculations (Andrussow, 1969)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spatial Distributions of Nitrifying Bacteria
In the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm, spherical clusters of densely packed probe Nso190-stained NH4+-oxidizing bacterial cells were detected throughout the oxic biofilm strata, indicating more or less a homogeneous spatial
Trang 6distribution of NH4+-oxidizing bacteria (Fig 3B) In contrast, clusters of the Ntspa 454 probe-stained
Nitrospira-like cells were primarily detected in the deeper part of the oxic region No hybridization signal was
observed when Nitrobacter-specific probes NIT2 and NIT3 were used with any of the samples The sequential
oxidation of NH4+ and NO2- found by microelectrode measurements coincides with locations where higher abundance of NH4+- and NO2--oxidizing bacteria were detected The lower NO2- oxidation activity in the surface zone can be explained by the absence (or lower abundance) of NO2--oxidizing bacteria This is a good example showing a correlation between the distribution of microbial species and accompanying expected activity However,
it is not always to find such correlation, because the spatial distributions of microbial species can be a result of previous stages of biofilm development, rather than an optimal adaptation to the actual microenvironments
Microelectrode Measurements
Steady-state concentration profiles of O2, NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- within the nitrifying biofilm were measured by
microsensors (Fig 3B) All measurements were performed in a flow cell reactor at 20°C, with an average liquid
velocity of 2-3 cm s-1 by blowing air on the water surface The medium used for microprofile measurements contained following ingredients: 200 µM NH4Cl, 50 µM NaNO2, 300 µM NaNO3, 570 µM Na2HPO4, 84 µM MgCl2·6H2O, 200 µM CaCl2, and 270 µM EDTA (pH=7.0) Oxygen penetrated approximately 200 µm into the biofilm (biofilm thickness = ca 250 µm) The NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- profiles showed that the consumed NH4+ was primarily converted to NO2- in the upper 75 µm with a NO2- peak of 64 - 73 µM at 50 - 75 µm and no significant
NO3- production in this zone The produced NO2- was eventually converted to NO3- in the deeper oxic layer
Figure 3 Fluorescence in situ hybridization result combined with microsensor measurements An autotrophic
nitrifying biofilm was cultured with synthetic medium (the substrate C/N ratio was 0) In situ hybridization of a vertical
biofilm thin section with TRITC-labeled Nso190 probe specific for NH4+-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subclass of the
Proteobacteria (red stain clusters) and FITC-labeled Ntspa454 and Ntspa1026 specific for Nitrospira moscoviensis
and some environmental clones (green stain clusters) (A) Corresponding steady-state microprofiles of O2, NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- in the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm (B) The distribution and magnitude of the estimated specific rates of net consumption and production of NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- (C) The solid lines are the best fits from the model to calculate the specific consumption and production rates of NH4+, NO2-, and NO3- The biofilm surface was at a depth of zero
The values are means of triplicate measurements
Trang 7(75-150 µm) This result demonstrates the sequential oxidation of NH4+ and NO2- in the oxic biofilm strata, that is, the active NH4+-oxidizing zone is located in the outer part of the oxic biofilm, whereas the active NO2--oxidizing zone is located just below the NH4+-oxidizing zone (Fig.3C) Obviously, this sequential oxidation of NH4+ and
NO2- at such a scale can only be observed with microelectrodes This characteristic distribution of in situ nitrifying
activity was well correlated to the vertical distribution of NH4+- and NO2--oxidizing bacteria in the corresponding
biofilm determined by use of FISH technique (Fig.3A)
We also analyzed the spatial distribution of ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and the microprofiles of NH4+,
NO2-, and NO3- in an autotrophic nitrifying biofilm that was initially fed with enrichment culture of nitrifying bacteria (bioaugmented biofilm) This bioaugmented biofilm showed a quite different spatial distribution of both nitrifying bacteria from that in the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm (data not shown) Both ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacterial clusters were densely present in the upper 100 µm of the biofilm Microsensor measurements indicated that oxygen penetrated approximately 150 µm into the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm The
NH4+ and NO2- profiles showed that NH4+ and NO2- were both consumed and converted to NO3- in the upper 100
µm Thus, the active NH4+ oxidation zone completely overlapped with the active NO2- oxidation zone This result was in good agreement with the spatial organization of NH4+- and NO2--oxidizing bacteria We obtained the average specific NH4+ and NO2- oxidation rates of 32.6±17.5 µmol NH4+ cm-3 h-1 and 24.1±15.3 µmol NO2- cm-3
h-1, respectively, which are comparable with the values reported in previous microsensor studies of nitrifying biofilms and aggregates
When biofilms were cultured with domestic wastewater and synthetic media containing organic carbon, the active
NH4+ oxidation zone was vertically separated from the active NO2- oxidation zone That is, the active NH4+ oxidation zone was located in the outer part of a biofilm, whereas the active NO2- oxidation zone was located just below the NH4+ oxidation zone We will discuss more about the relationship between the in situ activity of NH4+ and NO2- oxidation and the spatial distributions of NH4+- and NO2--oxidizing bacteria within biofilms grown in different media
This is a good example showing a correlation between the distribution of microbial species and accompanying expected activity However, it is not always to find such correlation, because the spatial distributions of microbial species can be a result of previous stages of biofilm development, rather than an optimal adaptation to the actual microenvironments
Micro-scale Spatial Organization of Nitrifying Bacteria
Although the biofilm was cultured in the synthetic medium containing no organic carbon, the NH4+-oxidizing bacteria clusters were surrounded by a number of heterotrophs including filamentous bacteria, which may suggest these heterotrophs could utilize soluble organic compounds secreted from NH4+-oxidizing bacteria (Kindaichi et
al., 2004) NH4+-oxidizing bacteria formed densely packed spherical clusters and closely associated with
NO2--oxidizing bacteria, demonstrating the sequential metabolism of ammonia via nitrite to nitrate By such close association, the diffusion path from NH4+-oxidizing bacterial clusters to the surrounding NO2--oxidizing bacteria is short and facilitates an efficient transfer of the intermediate NO2- It should be noted that these micro-scale spatial organizations of two phylogenetically unrelated species can only be obtained by use of the FISH technique
Microbial diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria
The phylogenetic microbial diversity of two types of nitrifying biofilms, a domestic wastewater and an autotrophic nitrifying biofilms, were determined by 16S rDNA-cloning and compared (data not shown) 16S rDNA clone libraries were constructed by PCR with a beta-subdivision ammonia-oxidizing bacteria-specific primer set (CTO189f and CTO654), and partial sequencing (465-bp) including variable V3 region of the clonal 16S rDNAs was conducted for phylogenetic analysis Among the clones analyzed, 10 and 7 different sequences (operational taxonomic units: OTUs) were found in the domestic wastewater biofilm and autotrophic nitrifying biofilm libraries, respectively 16S rDNA sequence analysis revealed that about 62% of the total domestic wastewater biofilm
clones sequenced were closely related to members of Nitrosomonas ureae with more than 97% sequence similarity These clones were closely related to each others We also detected three clones affiliated with Nitrosomonas
europaea, Nitrosomonas eutropha, and Nitrosococcus mobilis, respectively One clone was affiliated with a deeply
branched group of Nitrosovibrio and Nitrosococcus In the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm library, the most
Trang 8dominant sequence was affiliated with Nitrosomonas eutropha with more than 95% sequence similarity Six clones were closely related to Nitrosomonas europaea This result indicated that although the strains affiliated with N
ureae were numerically dominant NH4+-oxidizers in the domestic wastewater biofilm, N eutropha and N
europaea who have higher growth rates became dominant populations in the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm after
switching to the synthetic nutrient medium
Development of NH 4 + -oxidizing Bacterial Populations in Biofilms
To visualize the population dynamics of NH4+-oxidizing bacteria in the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm, fluorescent
in situ hybridization (FISH) with a set of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes (i.e., Nso190, Nsm156 and
NEU) were performed In situ hybridization of vertical biofilm thin sections clearly indicated that the numbers of
probe NEU-stained NH4+-oxidizing bacteria (i.e., Nitrosomonas marina-lineage, Nitrosomonas europaea-lineage,
Nitrosomonas eutropha, and Nitrosomonas halophila) were very low in the young autotrophic nitrifying biofilm,
and other Nitrosomonas-lineages which hybridized with probe Nsm156 but did not hybridized with NEU were
numerically dominant populations As the biofilm grew, probe NEU-stained NH4+-oxidizing bacteria became the dominant populations in the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm This population shift might be attributed to the inhibitory effect of NO2- accumulated up to approximately 1.5 mM during the biofilm growth and higher growth rates
In contrast, Nitrosomonas spp which hybridized with probe Nsm156 but did not hybridized with NEU were the
numerically dominant species in the domestic wastewater biofilm According to the results of 16S rDNA-cloning analysis, NH4+-oxidizing bacteria which hybridized with probe Nsm156 but did not hybridized with NEU could be
a member of Nitrosomonas ureae The FISH result reflected the results of 16S rDNA-cloning analysis The
NO2--oxidizing bacteria belonging to the genus Nitrobacter could not be detected; instead, Nitrospira were found
to be the main NO2--oxidizing bacteria in both types of biofilms
CONCLUSIONS
16S rRNA-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microsensor techniques have a high spatial (at a
single-cell resolution) and temporal resolution and great potential, and provide reliable and direct information
about the occurrence of specific microorganisms and their in situ microbial activity in biofilms, respectively Such
information cannot be obtained by conventional culture-dependent techniques These observations have considerable significance to our understandings of microbial nitrification occurring in wastewater biofilm processes
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We gratefully appreciate Naoko Norimatsu and Hatsuka Naitoh for their excellent technical assistance This work was supported by the Grant-in Aid (No.09750627) for Developmental Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan
REFERENCES
1 Altschul S F., W Gish, W Miller, E W Myers, and D J Lipman 1990 Basic local alignment search tool
J Mol Biol 215: 403-410
2 Amann, R I 1995 In situ identification of micro-organisms by whole-cell hybridization with rRNA-targeted
nucleic acid probes, p.1-15 In A D L Akkerman, J D van Elsas, and F J de Bruijn (ed.), Molecular
microbial ecology manual Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
3 Amann, R I., W Ludwig, and K -H Schleifer 1995 Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of
individual microbial cells without cultivation Microbiol Rev 59: 143-169
4 Andrussow, L 1969 Diffusion, P 513-727 In Landolt-Bornstein Zahlenw Funkt II/5a Springer, Berlin
5 de Beer, D., and J C van den Heuvel 1988 Gradients in immobilized biological systems Anal Chim Acta 213:259-265
6 de Beer, D., J C van den Heuvel, and S P P Ottengraf 1993 Microelectrode measurements of the
Trang 9activity distribution in nitrifying bacterial aggregates Appl Environ Microbiol 59:573-579
7 de Beer, D., A Schramm, C M Santegoeds, and M Kühl 1997 A nitrite microsensor for profiling
environmental biofilms Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 973-977
8 Gieseke A., U Purkhold, M Wagner, R Amann, and A Schramm 2001 Community structure and activity dynamics of nitrifying bacteria in a phosphate-removing biofilm Appl Environ Microbiol 67:
1351-1362
9 Head, I M., J R Saunders, and R W Pickup 1998 Microbial evolution, diversity, and ecology: a decade
of ribosomal RNA analysis of uncultivated microorganisms Microbiol Ecol 35: 1-21
10 Hovanec, T A., L T Taylar, A Blakis, and E F Delong 1998 Nitrospira-like bacteria associated with
nitrite oxidation in freshwater aquaria Appl Environ Microbiol 64:258-264
11 Ito, T., S Okabe, H Satoh, and Y Watanabe 2002 Successional development of sulfate-reducing bacteria
populations and their activities in a wastewater biofilm growing under microaerophilic conditions Appl
Environ Microbiol 68: 1392-1402
12 Juretschko, S., G Timmermann, M Schmid, K -H Schleifer, A Pommerening-Roser, H.-P Koops, and
M Wagner 1998 Combined molecular and conventional analyses of nitrifying bacterium diversity in
activated sludge: Nitrosococcus mobilis and Nitrospira-like bacteria as dominant populations Appl Environ
Microbiol 64:3042-3051
13 Kindaichi T., T Ito, and S Okabe 2004 Eco-physiological interaction between nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1641-1650
14 Kowalchuk G A., J R Stephen, W De Boer, J I Prosser, T M Embley, and J W Woldendrop 1997
Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the β-subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes
by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments
Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1489-1497
15 Kuhl, M and B B Jorgensen 1992 Microsensor measurements of sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation in
compact microbial communities of aerobic biofilms Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1164-1174
16 Liu, W T., T L Marsh, H Cheng, and L J Forney 1997 Characterization of microbial diversity by
determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA Appl Environ
Microbiol 63: 4516-4522
17 Lorenzen, J., L H Larsen, T Kjar, and N P Revsbech 1998 Biosensor detection of the microscale
distribution of nitrate, nitrate assimilation, nitrification, and denitrification in a diatom-inhabited freshwater
sediment Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3264-3269
18 Maidak B L., G L Olsen, N Larsen, R Overbeek, M J McCaughey, and C R Woese 1997 The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) Nucleic Acids Res 25: 109-110
19 Mobarry B K., M Wagner, V Urbain, B E Rittmann, and D A Stahl 1996 Phylogenetic probes for analyzing abundance and spatial organization of nitrifying bacteria Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2156-2162
20 Muyzer, G and K Smalla 1998 Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73: 127-141
21 Muyzer G., T Brinkhoff, U Nubel, C Santegoeds, H Schafer, and C Wawer 1997 Denaturing gradient
gel electrophresis (DGGE) in microbial ecology, p 1-27, In A D L Akkermans, J D van Elsas, and F J de
Bruijn (ed.), Molecular microbial ecology manual, vol 3.4.4 Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
22 Muyzer G., A Teske, C O Wirsen, and H W Jannasch 1995 Phylogenetic relationships of
Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient
gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments Arch Microbiol 164: 165-172
23 Okabe, S., K Hirata, Y Ozawa, and Y Watanabe 1996 Spatial microbial distributions of nitrifiers and
heterotrophs in mixed population biofilms Biotechnol Bioeng 50:24-35
24 Okabe, S., H Satoh, and Y Watanabe 1999a In situ analysis of nitrifying biofilms as determined by in situ
hybridization and the use of microelectrodes Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 3182-3191
25 Okabe, S., H Satoh, and Y Watanabe 2001 Analysis of microbial structure and function of nitrifying biofilms Meth Enzymol 337: 213-224
26 Okabe, S., T Ito, H Satoh, and Y Watanabe 1999b Analyses of spatial distributions of sulfate-reducing bacteria and their activity in aerobic wastewater biofilms Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 5107-5116
27 Okabe S T Ito, and H Satoh 2003 Sulfate-reducing bacterial community structure, function and their
contribution to carbon mineralization in a wastewater biofilm growing microaerophilic conditions Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 63:322-334
Trang 1028 Olsen, G J., D J Lane, S J Giovannoni, and N R Pace 1986 Microbial ecology and evolution: A ribosomal RNA approach Ann Rev Microbiol 40: 337-365
29 Pommerening-Roser, A., G Rath, and H -P Koop 1996 Phylogenetic diversity within the genus
Nitrosomonas Syst Appl Microbiol 19:344-351
30 Ramsing, N B., M Kühl, and B B Jorgensen 1993 Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S
in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probes and microelectrodes Appl Environ
Microbiol 59:3840-3849
31 Revsbech, N P., and B B Jorgensen 1986 Microelectrodes: Their use in microbial ecology Adv Microb Ecol 9: 293-352
32 Saito, N and M Nei 1987 The neighbor-joining method: a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees Mol Biol Evol 4: 406-425
33 Satoh, H., S Okabe, Y Yamaguchi, and Y Watanabe 2003 Evaluation of the bioaugmentation and
biostimulation by in situ hybridization and microelectrodes Water Res 37:2206-2216
34 Schleifer, K.-H., R Amann, W Ludwig, C Rothemund, N Springer, and S Dorn 1992 Nucleic acid
probes for the identification and in situ detection of Pseudomonas, Pp.127-134 In E Galli, S Silver, B
Witholt (ed.), Pseudomonas; molecular biology and biotechnology American Society for Microbiology,
Washington, D.C
35 Schramm, A., L H Larsen, N P Revsbech, R I Amann, and K.-H Schleifer 1996 Structure and
function of a nitrifying biofilm as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes Appl
Environ Microbiol 62: 4641-4647
36 Schramm, A., D de Beer, A Gieseke, and R Amann 2000 Microenvironments and distribution of
nitrifying bacteria in a membrane-bound biofilm Environ Microbiol 2: 680-686
37 Teske A., C Wawer, G Muyzer, and N B Ramsing 1996 Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a
stratified fjord (Mariager Fjord, Denmark) as evaluated by most-probable-number counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA fragments Appl Environ Microbiol
62:1405-1415
38 Thompson, J D., D G Higgins, and T J Gibson 1994 CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of
progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and
weight matrix choice Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680
39 Wagner, M., R Amann, P Kampfer, B Assmus, A Hartmann, P Hutzler, N Springer, and K-H
Schleifer 1994 Identification and in situ detection of gram-negative filamentous bacteria in activated sludge System Appl Microbiol 17:405-417
40 Wagner, M., G Rath, R Amann, H-P Koops, and K-H Schleifer 1995 In situ identification of
ammonia-oxidizing bacteria System Appl Microbiol 18:251-264
41 Wagner, M., G Rath, H-P Koops, J Flood, and R Amann 1996 In situ analysis of nitrifying bacteria in sewage treatment plants Wat Sci Tech 34(1/2): 237-244