Managing the Risk of an Equity Portfolio LO.a: Demonstrate the use of equity futures contracts to achieve a target beta for a stock portfolio and calculate and interpret the number of fu
Trang 1Risk Management Applications of Forward and Futures Strategies
1 Introduction 3
2 Strategies and Applications for Managing Interest Rate Risk 3
2.1 Managing the Interest Rate Risk of a Loan Using an FRA 3
2.2 Strategies and Applications for Managing Bond Portfolio Risk 3
3 Strategies and Applications for Managing Equity Market Risk 3
3.1 Measuring and Managing the Risk of Equities 3
3.2 Managing the Risk of an Equity Portfolio 4
3.3 Creating Equity out of Cash 5
3.4 Creating Cash out of Equity 6
4 Asset Allocation with Futures 8
4.1 Adjusting the Allocation among Asset Classes 8
4.2 Pre-Investing in an Asset Class 10
5 Strategies and Applications for Managing Foreign Currency Risk 11
5.1 Managing the Risk of a Foreign Currency Receipt 12
5.2 Managing the Risk of a Foreign Currency Payment 12
5.3 Managing the Risk of a Foreign-Market Asset Portfolio 13
6 Futures or Forwards? 13
7 Final Comments 14
Summary 14
Examples from the curriculum 16
Example 1 16
Example 2 17
Example 3 18
Example 4 19
Example 5 20
Example 6 21
Example 7 22
Example 8 23
Example 9 24
This document should be read in conjunction with the corresponding reading in the 2018 Level III CFA®
Program curriculum Some of the graphs, charts, tables, examples, and figures are copyright
Trang 22017, CFA Institute Reproduced and republished with permission from CFA Institute All rights reserved
Required disclaimer: CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of the
products or services offered by IFT CFA Institute, CFA®, and Chartered Financial Analyst® are
trademarks owned by CFA Institute
Trang 31 Introduction
In this reading we will look at how forwards and futures can be used to manage risk
2 Strategies and Applications for Managing Interest Rate Risk
Note: Section 2 is optional, and is a revision of concepts covered earlier
2.1 Managing the Interest Rate Risk of a Loan Using an FRA
Forward rate agreements (FRA) are often used to manage interest rate risk Consider a company
planning to take out a loan at a later date If it fears that the interest rates will rise between now and the
day it takes out the loan, it can enter into a long position in an FRA and lock in the interest rate available
now
Refer to Example 1 from the curriculum
2.2 Strategies and Applications for Managing Bond Portfolio Risk
Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s price to change in its yield For example, if the
duration of a bond is 3 then a 1% increase in the yield will lead to a 3% decrease in the bond price
The duration of a bond portfolio can be modified by going long or short on bond futures Going long on
bond futures will increase the portfolio duration Going short on bond futures will decrease the portfolio
duration
Refer to Example 2 from the curriculum
3 Strategies and Applications for Managing Equity Market Risk
3.1 Measuring and Managing the Risk of Equities
We will use beta as our risk measure Beta is a relative risk measure For example, a beta of 1.1 means
that a stock is 10% more volatile than the benchmark A beta of 0.9 means that the stock is 10% less
volatile than the benchmark Beta is calculated as:
𝛽 =𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑠1
𝜎12
Where 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑠1 is the covariance between the stock portfolio and the index and 𝜎12 is the variance of the
index
We can use futures contract to change the portfolio beta Going long on futures contract increases
portfolio beta Going short on futures contract decreases portfolio beta The number of contracts
required to achieve a target beta is calculated as:
𝑁𝑓 = (𝛽𝑇− 𝛽𝑆
𝛽𝑇 ) (
𝑆
𝑓)
Trang 43.2 Managing the Risk of an Equity Portfolio
LO.a: Demonstrate the use of equity futures contracts to achieve a target beta for a stock portfolio
and calculate and interpret the number of futures contracts required
Exhibit 3 demonstrates a scenario where a pension fund wants to increase its equity portfolio beta
because it expects the market to be strong in the near future
Exhibit 3 Using Stock Index Futures to Manage the Risk of a Stock Portfolio
Scenario (2 September)
BB Holdings (BBH) is a US conglomerate Its pension fund generates market forecasts internally and
receives forecasts from an independent consultant As a result of these forecasts, BBH expects the
market for large-cap stocks to be stronger than it believes everyone else is expecting over the next two
months
Action
BBH decides to adjust the beta on $38,500,000 of large-cap stocks from its current level of 0.90 to 1.10
for the period of the next two months It has selected a futures contract deemed to have sufficient
liquidity; the futures price is currently $275,000 and the contract has a beta of 0.95 The appropriate
number of futures contracts to adjust the beta would be:
$38,500,000
$275,000 ) = 29.47
So it buys 29 contracts
Scenario (3 December)
The market as a whole increases by 4.4 percent The stock portfolio increases to $40,103,000 The stock
index futures contract rises to $286,687.50, an increase of 4.25 percent
Outcome and Analysis
The profit on the futures contract is 29($286,687.50 – $275,000.00) = $338,937.50 The rate of return
for the stock portfolio is:
$40,103,000
$38,500,000− 1 = 0.0416 or 4.16%
Adding the profit from the futures gives a total market value of $40,103,000.00 + $338,937.50 =
$40,441,937.50 The rate of return for the stock portfolio is:
$40,441,937.50
$38,500,000.00− 1 = 0.0504 = 5.04%Because the market went up by 4.4 percent and the overall gain
was 5.04 percent, the effective beta of the portfolio was:
0.0504
0.044 = 1.15
Trang 5Thus, the effective beta is quite close to the target beta of 1.10
However, a point to note is that increasing the beta increases the risk If the beta is increased and the
market falls, the loss on the portfolio will be greater than if the beta had not been increased
Refer to Example 3 from the curriculum
3.3 Creating Equity out of Cash
LO.b: Construct a synthetic stock index fund using cash and stock index futures (equitizing cash)
Stock index futures are often used to create synthetic positions in equity The advantage of this method
is that it saves transaction costs and preserves liquidity
A stock can be combined with a short position in a futures contract to create a risk-free payoff This can
be expressed as follows:
Long stock + Short futures = Long risk-free bond
This equation can be rearranged as:
Long stock = Long risk-free bond + Long futures
This shows that a synthetic equity position can be created by combining a risk free bond with futures
contracts
If the amount of money to be invested is V The number of futures contracts required to create a
synthetic equity position is calculated using the equation:
T = time to expiration of futures
δ = dividend yield on the index
r = risk-free rate
q = futures contract multiplier
Exhibit 4 demonstrates a scenario where a synthetic position in equity is created
Exhibit 4 Constructing a Synthetic Index Fund
Scenario (15 December)
On 15 December, a US money manager for a firm called Strategic Money Management (SMM) wants to
Trang 6construct a synthetic index fund consisting of a position of £100 million invested in UK stock The index
will be the FTSE 100, which has a dividend yield of 2.5 percent A futures contract on the FTSE 100 is
priced at £4,000 and has a multiplier of £10 The position will be held until the futures expires in three
months, at which time it will be renewed with a new three-month futures The UK risk-free rate is 5
percent Both the risk-free rate and the dividend yield are stated as annually compounded figures
we are actually synthetically investing:
2,531(£10)£4,000
(1.05)0.25 = £100,012,622
in stock So we put this much money in risk-free bonds, which will grow to £100,012,622(1.05)0.25 =
£101,240,000 The number of units of stock that we have effectively purchased at the start is:
𝑁𝑓∗ 𝑞
(1 + 𝛿)𝑇 = 2,531(10)
(1.025)0.25= 25,154.24
If the stock had actually been purchased, dividends would be received and reinvested into additional
shares Thus, the number of shares would grow to 25,154.24(1.025)0.25 = 25,310
Scenario (15 March)
The index is at ST when the futures expires
Outcome and Analysis
The futures contracts will pay off the amount:
Futures payoff = 2,531(£10)(ST – £4,000) = £25,310ST – £101,240,000
This means that the fund will pay £101,240,000 to settle the futures contract and obtain the market
value of 25,310 units of the FTSE 100, each worth ST Therefore, the fund will need to come up with
£101,240,000, but as noted above, the money invested in risk-free bonds grows to a value of
£101,240,000
SMM, therefore, pays this amount to settle the futures contracts and effectively ends up with 25,310
units of the index, the position it wanted in the market
Refer to Example 4 from the curriculum
3.4 Creating Cash out of Equity
LO.c: Explain the use of stock index futures to convert a long stock position into synthetic cash
Trang 7The relationship between a futures contract and the underlying stock is:
Long stock + Short futures = Long risk-free bond
Hence we can construct a synthetic position is cash by selling futures against a long stock position
The number of futures contract required is calculated as:
𝑁𝑓 = −𝑉(1 + 𝑟)
𝑇
𝑞𝑓
The negative sign means that we are selling futures
Exhibit 5 illustrates a scenario where pension fund wants to convert its stock position to cash
Exhibit 5 Creating Synthetic Cash
Scenario (2 June)
The pension fund of Interactive Industrial Systems (IIS) holds a $50 million portion of its portfolio in an
indexed position of the NASDAQ 100, which has a dividend yield of 0.75 percent It would like to convert
that position to cash for a two-month period It can do this using a futures contract on the NASDAQ 100,
which is priced at 1484.72, has a multiplier of $100, and expires in two months The risk-free rate is 4.65
stock synthetically converted to cash is really:
−𝑁𝑓∗ 𝑞𝑓
(1 + 𝑟)𝑇 =339($100)(1484.72)
(1.0465)2/12 = $49,952,173 This amount should grow to $49,952,173(1.0465)2/12 = $50,332,008 The number of units of stock is:
The stock index is at ST when the futures expires
Outcome and Analysis
The payoff of the futures contract is
Trang 8–339($100)*(ST – 1484.72) = –$33,900ST + $50,332,008
As noted, dividends are reinvested and the number of units of the index grows to 33,900 shares The
overall position of the fund is:
Stock worth 33,900 ST
Futures payoff of –33,900 ST + $50,332,008
or an overall total of $50,332,008 This is exactly the amount we said the fund would have if it invested
$49,952,173 at the risk-free rate of 4.65 percent for two months Thus, the fund has effectively
converted a stock position to cash
Refer to Example 5 from the curriculum
4 Asset Allocation with Futures
We can allocate a portfolio among asset classes using futures
4.1 Adjusting the Allocation among Asset Classes
LO.d: Demonstrate the use of equity and bond futures to adjust the allocation of a portfolio
between equity and debt
Exhibit 6 presents an example where a portfolio manager wants to reduce his allocation to stocks and
increase the allocation to bonds
Exhibit 6 Adjusting the Allocation between Stocks and Bonds
Scenario (15 November)
Global Asset Advisory Group (GAAG) is a pension fund management firm One of its funds consists of
$300 million allocated 80 percent to stock and 20 percent to bonds The stock portion has a beta of 1.10
and the bond portion has a duration of 6.5 GAAG would like to temporarily adjust the asset allocation
to 50 percent stock and 50 percent bonds It will use stock index futures and bond futures to achieve
this objective The stock index futures contract has a price of $200,000 (after accounting for the
multiplier) and a beta of 0.96 The bond futures contract has an implied modified duration of 7.2 and a
price of $105,250 The yield beta is 1 The transaction will be put in place on 15 November, and the
horizon date for termination is 10 January
Action
The market value of the stock is 0.80($300,000,000) = $240,000,000 The market value of the bonds is
0.20($300,000,000) = $60,000,000 Because it wants the portfolio to be temporarily reallocated to half
stock and half bonds, GAAG needs to change the allocation to $150 million of each
Thus, GAAG effectively needs to sell $90 million of stock by converting it to cash using stock index
futures and buy $90 million of bonds by using bond futures This would effectively convert the stock into
cash and then convert that cash into bonds Of course, this entire series of transactions will be synthetic;
Trang 9the actual stock and bonds in the portfolio will stay in place
Using Equation 5, the number of stock index futures, denoted as Nsf, will be:
𝑁𝑠𝑓= (𝛽𝑇− 𝛽𝑆
𝛽𝑓 )
𝑆
𝑓𝑆where βT is the target beta of zero, βS is the stock beta of 1.10, βf is the futures beta of 0.96, S is the
market value of the stock involved in the transaction of $90 million, and fs is the price of the stock index
Using Equation 4, the number of bond futures, denoted as Nbf, will be:
𝑁𝑏𝑓 = (𝑀𝐷𝑈𝑅𝑇− 𝑀𝐷𝑈𝑅𝐵
𝐵
𝑓𝑏where MDURT is the target modified duration of 6.5, MDURB is the modified duration of the existing
bonds, MDURf is the implied modified duration of the futures (here 7.2), B is the market value of the
bonds of $90 million, and fb is the bond futures price of $105,250 The modified duration of the existing
bonds is the modified duration of a cash position The sale of stock index futures provides $90 million of
synthetic cash that is now converted into bonds using bond futures Because no movement of actual
cash is involved in these futures market transactions, the modified duration of cash is effectively equal
During this period, the stock portion of the portfolio returns –3 percent and the bond portion returns
1.25 percent The stock index futures price goes from $200,000 to $193,600, and the bond futures price
increases from $105,250 to $106,691
Outcome and Analysis
The profit on the stock index futures transaction is –516($193,600 – $200,000) = $3,302,400 The profit
on the bond futures transaction is 772($106,691 – $105,250) = $1,112,452 The total profit from the
futures transaction is, therefore, $3,302,400 + $1,112,452 = $4,414,852 The market value of the stocks
and bonds will now be:
Stocks: $240,000,000(1−0.03) =$232,800,000
Bonds: $60,000,000(1.0125) =$60,750,000
Trang 10Total $293,550,000
Thus, the total portfolio value, including the futures gains, is $293,550,000 + $4,414,852 = $297,964,852
Had GAAG sold stocks and then converted the proceeds to bonds, the value would have been:
Exhibit 7 provides a scenario where a manager wants to convert a portion of his long-term bond
portfolio to cash to improve liquidity The key point to note is that reducing duration to replicate a short
term instrument does not remove the problem that long term instruments, which are still held, may
have to be liquidated
Exhibit 8 provides a scenario where a manager wants to adjust allocation between one equity class
(large-cap) and another (mid-cap)
Refer to Example 6 from the curriculum
4.2 Pre-Investing in an Asset Class
LO.e: Demonstrate the use of futures to adjust the allocation of a portfolio across equity sectors and
to gain exposure to an asset class in advance of actually committing funds to the asset class
Say we expect the equity markets to rise over the next six months and want to benefit from the bull run
without making an up-front investment We can ‘pre-invest’ in equity by taking a long position in a
six-month equity futures contract The key is to create a position with the appropriate beta A similar
approach can be used to ‘pre-invest’ in bonds but here the key is to create a position with the
appropriate duration
Exhibit 9 presents an example where an entity wants to pre-invest in stocks and bonds
Exhibit 9 Pre-Investing in Asset Classes
Scenario (28 February)
Quantitative Mutual Funds Advisors (QMFA) uses modern analytical techniques to manage money for a
number of mutual funds QMFA is not necessarily an aggressive investor, but it does not like to be out of
the market QMFA has learned that it will receive an additional $10 million to invest Although QMFA
would like to receive the money now, the money is not available for three months If it had the money
now, QMFA would invest $6 million in stocks at an average beta of 1.08 and $4 million in bonds at a
modified duration of 5.25 It believes the market outlook over the next three months is highly attractive
Therefore, QMFA would like to invest now, which it can do by trading stock and bond futures An
appropriate stock index futures contract is selling at $210,500 and has a beta of 0.97 An appropriate
bond futures contract is selling for $115,750 and has an implied modified duration of 6.05 The current
Trang 11date is 28 February, and the money will be available on 31 May The number of stock index futures
contracts will be denoted as Nsf, and the number of bond futures contracts will be denoted as Nbf
Action
QMFA wants to take a position in $6 million of stock index futures at a beta of 1.08 It currently has no
position; hence, its beta is zero The required number of stock index futures contracts to obtain this
$6,000,000
$210,500 ) = 31.74
So QMFA buys 32 stock index futures contracts
To gain exposure at a duration of 5.25 on $4 million of bonds, the number of bond futures contracts is
𝑁𝑏𝑓 = (𝑀𝐷𝑈𝑅𝑇− 𝑀𝐷𝑈𝑅𝐵
𝑀𝐷𝑈𝑅𝑓 ) (𝐵
𝑓) = (
5.25 − 0.06.05 ) (
$4,000,000
$115,750 ) = 29.99 Thus, QMFA buys 30 bond futures contracts
Scenario (31 May)
During this period, the stock increased by 2.2 percent and the bonds increased by 0.75 percent The
stock index futures price increased to $214,500, and the bond futures price increased to $116,734
Outcome and Analysis
The profit on the stock index futures contracts is 32($214,500 – $210,500) = $128,000 The profit on the
bond futures contracts is 30($116,734 – $115,750) = $29,520 The total profit is, therefore, $128,000 +
$29,520 = $157,520
Had QMFA actually invested the money, the stock would have increased in value by $6,000,000(0.022) =
$132,000, and the bonds would have increased in value by $4,000,000(0.0075) = $30,000, for a total
increase in value of $132,000 + $30,000 = $162,000, which is relatively close to the futures gain of
$157,520 The difference of $4,480 between this approach and the synthetic one is about 0.04 percent
of the $10 million invested This difference is due to the fact that stocks and bonds do not always
respond in the manner predicted by their betas and durations and also that the number of futures
contracts is rounded off
Refer to Example 7 from the curriculum
5 Strategies and Applications for Managing Foreign Currency Risk
A company that engages in business in other countries has the following foreign currency risks:
Transaction exposure: Risk associated with changes in exchange rate during the period in which
a transaction was initiated and was later completed
Translation exposure: Risk associated with translating the value of assets back into domestic
currency
Economic exposure: Risk associated with the relationship between exchange rate changes and
Trang 12changes in the asset values in the foreign market
LO.f: Explain exchange rate risk and demonstrate the use of forward contracts to reduce the risk
associated with a future receipt or payment in a foreign currency
This LO is covered in Section 5.1 and 5.2
5.1 Managing the Risk of a Foreign Currency Receipt
Exhibit 10 provides a scenario where a company wants to manage the risk of a foreign currency receipt
Exhibit 10 Managing the Risk of a Foreign Currency Receipt
Scenario (15 August)
H-Tech Hardware, a US company, sells its products in many countries It recently received an order for
some computer hardware from a major European government The sale is denominated in euros and is
in the amount of €50 million H-Tech will be paid in euros; hence, it bears exchange rate risk The
current date is 15 August, and the euros will be received on 3 December
Action
On 15 August, H-Tech decides to lock in the 3 December exchange rate by entering into a forward
contract that obligates it to deliver €50 million and receive a rate of $0.877 H-Tech is effectively long
the euro in its computer hardware sale, so a short position in the forward market is appropriate
Scenario (3 December)
The exchange rate on this day is ST, but as we shall see, this value is irrelevant for H-Tech because it is
hedged
Outcome and Analysis
The company receives its €50 million, delivers it to the dealer, and is paid $0.877 per euro for a total
payment of €50,000,000($0.877) = $43,850,000 H-Tech thus pays the €50 million and receives $43.85
million, based on the rate locked in on 15 August
5.2 Managing the Risk of a Foreign Currency Payment
Exhibit 11 provides a scenario where a company wants to manage the risk of a foreign currency
payment
Exhibit 11 Managing the Risk of a Foreign Currency Payment
Scenario (2 March)
American Manufacturing Catalyst (AMC) is a US company that occasionally makes steel and copper
purchases from non-US companies to meet unexpected demand that cannot be filled through its
domestic suppliers On 2 March, AMC determines that it will need to buy a large quantity of steel from a
Japanese company on 1 April It has entered into a contract with the Japanese company to pay ¥900
million for the steel At a current exchange rate of $0.0083 per yen, the purchase will currently cost