BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 1, 2009 McGee – Spore-PrintsI photograph and measure the spores in water first, and later may mount the spores in other media for other treat
Trang 1Bulletin
of the
California Lichen Society
Volume 16 No 1 Summer 2009
Trang 2The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation and study oflichens The interests of the Society include the entire western part of the continent, although thefocus is on California Dues categories (in $US per year): Student and fixed income - $10,Regular - $20 ($25 for foreign members), Family - $25, Sponsor and Libraries - $35, Donor -
$50, Benefactor - $100 and Life Membership - $500 (one time) payable to the California LichenSociety, PO Box 7775 #21135 , San Francisco, California 94120-7775 Members receive theBulletin and notices of meetings, field trips, lectures and workshops
Board Members of the California Lichen Society:
President: Erin Martin, shastalichens gmail.com
Vice President: Michelle Caisse
Secretary: Patti Patterson
Treasurer: Cheryl Beyer
Committees of the California Lichen Society:
Education/Outreach: Erin Martin, chairperson
Poster/Mini Guides: Janet Doell, chairperson
Events/field trips/workshops: Judy Robertson, chairperson
The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society (ISSN 1093-9148) is edited by Tom Carlberg,tcarlberg7 yahoo.com The Bulletin has a review committee including Larry St Clair, ShirleyTucker, William Sanders, and Richard Moe, and is produced by Eric Peterson The Bulletinwelcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and
on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their activities The best way
to submit manuscripts is by e-mail attachments or on a CD in the format of a major wordprocessor (DOC or RTF preferred) Submit a file without paragraph formatting; do include italics
or underlining for scientific names Figures may be submitted electronically or in hard copy.Figures submitted electronically should provide a resolution of 300 pixels-per-inch (600minimum for line drawings in JPEG format); hard copy figures may be submitted as linedrawings, unmounted black and white glossy photos or 35mm negatives or slides (B&W orcolor) Email submissions of figures are limited to 10 MB per email, but large files may be splitacross several emails or other arrangements can be made Contact the Production Editor, EricPeterson, at eric theothersideofthenet.com for details of submitting illustrations or other largefiles A review process is followed Nomenclature follows Esslinger cumulative checklist on-line
at http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/esslinge/chcklst/chcklst7.htm The editors may substituteabbreviations of author’s names, as appropriate, from R.K Brummitt and C.E Powell, Authors ofPlant Names, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1992 Instructions to authors will soon be available
on the Society’s web site (below) Style follows this issue Electronic reprints in PDF format will
be emailed to the lead author at no cost
The deadline for submitting material for the Winter 2009 CALS Bulletin is October 31 2009.
The California Lichen Society is online at http://CaliforniaLichens.org and has email discussionsthrough http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CaliforniaLichens
Volume 16 (1) of the Bulletin was issued 31 August 2009
Front cover: Pannaria rubiginosa and captured spores (see paper on page 1) Photography by
Mikki McGee
Trang 3Bulletin of the California Lichen Society
VOLUME 16 NO 1 SUMMER 2009
Spore-Printing Lichens
Mikki McGee
8 Visitacion Ave #10Brisbane, CA 94005 mikkimc earthlink.netSexual spores of lichens are important to the
lichen-fungus as well as to the person identifying
lichens, or classifying them The person identifying
or classifying lichens wishes to have clear
unobstructed or unobscured view of as many spores
as possible Their sizes and shapes and septation are
used in distinguishing one species from the other
For the fungus, spores are arguably less important as
propagules for starting new thalli than as a sexual
means for maintaining sexual or genetic diversity in
the thallus and the population
Finding enough spores that are clearly visible to
identify the lichen can be difficult Tissues may be
overlaying or underlying the free spores found,
making them less clearly visible And spores still in
asci are possibly distorted by the pressures of the
ascus
Mycologists studying mushroom fungi make a
regular practice of trying to get a collection of spores
on a piece of paper by laying the mushroom on paper
in a moist environment (covered by a dish) for an
hour or so The spores falling onto the paper are then
examined for dry color, and examined
microscopically for size and form The paper on
which the print is made often stays with the specimen
for later examination Ascus-bearing larger fungi
(dime to dinner plate size) sometimes are treated the
same as the more common basidiocarps
The fresh smaller ascocarps of lichens may also
produce deposits of spores which can serve some of
the same processes, when collected on cover glasses
I use 12x12mm cover glasses routinely, and often
easily collect more than enough spores to
characterize the spores and the lichen, and they are
free of any tissues that might obscure them
The method is simple, but does not work for
most of the material already long dead in herbaria It
may be used successfully on material that has notbeen forcibly air dried or frozen Lichens fresh fromthe field are best If there are several specimens, one
is selected If only one is available, then it may besubdivided to produce one fragment for sporeprinting, or the entire collection used, at thediscretion of the worker A single fruiting body may
be spore printed successfully, if it is fresh and aliveand undepleted on collection
The lichen is placed in a petri dish, and soakedwith distilled water (Tap water is generally treatedwith chemicals that may harm the lichen, and bottledwater often contains many more bacteria andprotozoa than tap water.) When the lichen is wellsoaked, excess water is poured off, and a cover slip islaid over several fruiting bodies If the specimen isquite small, a folded wad of wet paper towel may beenclosed in the dish to maintain moisture (Figure 1)
It is common for water to seal the cover glass to thelichen - it holds the cover glass in place
The asci, on discharge, forcibly shoot the sporessome distance, and the spores being sticky attach tothe cover glass After an hour or so, I examine thecover glass in water on a slide, to look for spores Inthe meantime, I may be preparing other parts of thesame collection, or having coffee
Water is the first choice of mounting media Thespores so examined may still show their halos well, ifthey have them The halo, being of weak gelatin,once dried and shrunk may not re-expand later Ifone wishes to preserve the halo for later examination,transferring the cover-glass after measurement to apreserving mountant such as Hantsch's fluid mayserve I also use formalin-alcohol-acetic acid (FAA)
to kill, fix and preserve spores and other things forless distorted later viewing than with other methods.But the first measurement is always in water
Trang 4BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 McGee – Spore-Prints
I photograph and measure the spores in water
first, and later may mount the spores in other media
for other treatments If several cover glasses are used,
one can treat each one differently - one for staining in
iodine, or one to Hantsch's, eliminating oil droplets to
see the septa more clearly The treated spores are then
photographed and measured again, to see and record
the effect of the treatments Some of the spores may
detach from the cover slip and be found on the slide
when the cover slip is lifted, making two
preservations possible, as well
Some spores, as of Teloschistes, Xanthoria and
Caloplaca, are routinely heat treated to kill and dry
them, for comparison to herbarium type material
This is easily done on the cover slip after the initial
examination For my work, I want to see them fresh,
as well It is interesting to see the fresh viable spores,
as well as seeing the mummies the taxonomists love
Hantsch's Fluid:
1 part(ml) glycerin with 2 parts water are mixed
as stock solution One drop of 95% alcohol is added
to one drop of this stock for use, yielding two drops
of 1,2,3 glycerin-water-alcohol, which on evaporation
of the alcohol and water can make permanent ringedslides of one 24mm or two 12mm cover glasses.Preserved slides are placed in packets after ringing
Formalin-Alcohol-Acetic Acid (FAA):
This is a standard preservative, which for fungiand lichens is usually mixed 10 parts 40% formalin,
50 parts 95% Alcohol, 5 parts glacial acetic acid;with 35 parts of water (Total 100 parts.)
The glacial acetic acid can be adjusted too: from
2 parts to 6 parts, (2%-6% final acidity) to reduceshrinkage, or swelling from formalin and alcohol.Adjust by exchanging water for acid, or vice verse.(Email me for answers to questions.)
Figure 1 Pannaria rubiginosa (from the San Bruno
Mountain field trip, reported elsewhere in this issue)
prepared for spore printing Note the paper toweling
beneath the lichen The edges of the cover slip are just
visible Printed in color on front cover
Figure 2 Spores captured using the methods inthis article Printed in color on front cover
Trang 5BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Tucker – New Reports
New Reports and Comments on California Lichens
Shirley TuckerSanta Barbara Botanic GardenSanta Barbara, CAtucker lifesci.ucsb.eduNew additions to the California lichen flora are
published continually, and some of these merit
comments to stimulate searching and collecting in the
state Most are not in the most recent published
checklist for the United States (Esslinger & Egan
1995), but all are in the online checklist by Esslinger
(2008) I add these to my manuscript of the
California catalogue (Tucker & Ryan, 2006) and
eventually these additions will be inserted in the
online version of the catalogue Meanwhile, the
following deserve attention from collectors
Byssoloma leucoblepharum (Nyl.) Vainio
I found this crust once on bark in Mendocino
County (S Tucker 35280, Pygmy forest, Mitchell
Creek Drive near Fort Bragg, SBBG) The apothecia
are unmistakable because of the “byssoid” margin,
like a fluffy halo of outward-extending colorless
hyphae around the dark disk There is a photograph
of this crust in Brodo et al 2001 (p.192) showing the
purplish-brown disk and pale margin, although the
magnification is not great enough to show the fluffy
margin It is labeled as B meadii, but that species has
pale yellow disks and is in southeastern U S Another
species, B marginatum, has been found in Sequoia
sempervirens treetops of Humboldt County by
Williams & Sillett (2007) The minute apothecia of
this species are pale greenish-gray and lack a byssoid
margin
An unusual lichen niche on the Pacific
Northwest coast was mentioned by Williams & Sillett
(2007) and more recently emphasized by Spribille et
al (2009) Unusual minute lichen crusts occur on
stems of ericaceous evergreen shrubs such as species
of Vaccinium and Rhododendron, close to ground
level in rain forests Collectors in northern CA could
add new reports to the California lichen flora by
searching this niche
Ptychographa xylographoides Nyl
McCune (1997) described this taxon from
Oregon; Williams & Sillett (2007) climbed to the
tops of redwoods in Humboldt County and found an
amazing flora of lichens, mosses and angiosperms
growing there They found 183 lichen species, 50
bryophytes, and 49 species of vascular plants Thearticle is well worth reading, as it not only describesthe rope-climbing techniques used to access thetreetops, but also discusses in detail the many andvaried niches where lichens may grow – on live anddead foliage, large vs small branches and twigs, barewood, soil and plant debris lodged in branch
crotches, and tree litter Ptychographa is found on
dead wood, especially in conifer forests, the same
habitat as the similar Xylographa McCune (1997)
mentioned a means of field identification:
Ptychographa resembles a Graphis or Opegrapha in
having black lirellae (elongate apothecia) but has amiddle ridge separating two parallel elongatehymenia The spores are colorless unicells, like those
of Xylographa but quite unlike the septate spores of either Graphis or Opegrapha
Other lichens new to California found byWilliams & Sillett (2007) include a new species of
pin-lichen, Calicium sequoiae (Williams & Tibell 2008), three newly reported species of Micarea
(determined by Brian Coppins), and the first state
report of Segestria leptalea, a pyrenolichen with tiny
orange perithecia on bark
Arthonia
These inconspicuous crusts are common on bark,with at least 29 species reported from California,differing mainly in ascocarp appearance and sporetype (Grube 2008 [2007]) The ascocarps may becircular dark spots ~ 1 mm in diameter, or lirellae,branched or dendroid, pruinose or not, depending onthe species The nearly globose asci are usuallywithin one or two layers of the surface of the bark,and contain eight spores With Grube’s key available,
it is worth collecting likely species of Arthonia Probably the most common Arthonia is A pruinata, a white pruinose crust common on live oak, Quercus
agrifolia Other species that are common in the Santa
Barbara area are A lecanactidea, A pinastri, A.
sanguinea, and A tetramera In north coastal
counties, Arthonia ilicina occurs on alder
Several species of Arthonia were found by
Williams & Sillett (2007) in Humboldt County, but
the species reported (Arthonia arthonioides, A.
Trang 6BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Tucker – New Reports
leucopellaea, A stellaris), most of which would be
new to CA, are probably incorrect The specimens
respectively key to more likely species reported by
Grube (2008 [2007]) in the recent Sonoran Lichen
Flora as Arthonia pinastri, A glaucella, and A.
pyrrhuliza I’ve found A pinastri on pine, Quercus
agrifolia, Populus trichocarpa, and sycamore in
Santa Barbara County
Grube (2008 [2007]) has sunk the genus
Arthothelium (having muriform spores) in Arthonia
(mostly septate spores) He does not consider spore
type sufficient to separate these two genera A
common California Arthonia with muriform spores is
Arthonia beccariana The ascocarps are circular
black superficial spots on twigs The spores are 18-23
µm long I have found Arthonia beccariana on
cultivated Aralia and Beaucarnea (ponytail palm) in
Santa Barbara County and on Populus sp on the
campus of the University of California, Santa Cruz.
Another related species, Arthothelium norvegicum
Coppins & Tønsberg, was discovered on Vaccinium
ovatum twigs (Tønsberg & Williams 2006, citing C.
Williams 313, Humboldt Co collection; Williams &
Sillett 2007) It has not been transferred officially to
Arthonia so remains in Arthothelium for the time
being The spores are much larger than those of
Arthonia beccariana.
Candelaria pacifica Westberg
Reference to recent issues of CALS Bulletins,
summarized by Carlberg & Doell (2009), indicates
that most collectors are not yet recognizing that our
most common Candelaria on bark may be C.
pacifica Candelaria concolor has been widely
accepted as the common species across the U S., but
Westberg & Nash (2002) recognized that C pacifica
is very common on the west coast Most of my
collections, from Amador and Solano County in
central CA to those in Santa Barbara County, key to
C pacifica in Westberg’s key (2002) C pacifica is
characterized by having soredia below the tips, no
lower cortex, and by having 8-spored asci
Candelariella antennaria Räs., C biatorina M.
Westb., & C lutella (Vain.) Räs
Species of Candelariella on bark have bright
gold-colored crustose thalli, often with apothecia but
are generally small and overlooked Westberg’s key
(2004) reveals that there are several species on bark
that should be looked for in California Among these,
Candelariella biatorina (Westberg 2007a; Westberg
& Nash 2008 [2007]) is easily identified by its
biatorine apothecia (lacking a margin), as shown in a
color photograph in Sonoran Flora, Vol 3 It is found
on conifer bark or wood Two other species withlecanorine apothecia (having a margin) include
Candelariella antennaria with yellow apothecia on a
gray thallus and 8-spored asci, and C lutella with
yellow apothecia and thalli, and 24-32 spores perascus Three articles by Westberg (2007a, 2007b,
2007c) comprise a monograph of Candelariella for
the western U S and Mexico
Coenogonium luteum (Dicks.) Kalb & Lücking.
This species was formerly called Dimerella
lutea, and is easily recognized by the usually vivid
green crust on bark and pale orange apothecia, less
bright than a Caloplaca The only recent published
primary report for CA is by Judy Robertson (2002a)from Monterey County; I’ve found it in the pygmyforest in Monterey County, on Monterey cypress onthe Monterey peninsula, and on madrone on thecampus of University of California, Santa Cruz, on a
CALS foray (Tucker et al 2004) A second species,
Coenogonium pineti (Ach.) Lücking & Lumbsch,
has been reported only once in CA, near Larkspur inMarin County by Albert Herre in 1943; I haveverified the specimen, now in the Field Museumherbarium in Chicago
Hypogymnia gracilis McCune
This species was recognized and published byBruce McCune (2002) He identified many
specimens labeled H imshaugii from the Santa Barbara Botanic Garden herbarium as H gracilis,
based on the white internal surface and small regularholes on the lower side It is worth checking
specimens of H imshaugii, the most common
Hypogymnia in California, for unrecognized
collections of H gracilis Some records of H.
gracilis include D Keil, s.n., Los Osos, San Luis
Obispo Co., Nov 1955, OBI; T Nash 29969, Hastings Natural History Reserve, Monterey Co., ASU; S.
Tucker 37576, trail to East Peak, Mt Tamalpais,
Marin Co., SBBG
Menegazzia subsimilis (H Magn.) R Sant
This species resembles the more common M.
terebrata of the north-coastal flora except that it has
stalked soralia Looking through specimens labeled
M terebrata in herbaria will probably turn up one or
two of M subsimilis that had not been recognized Williams & Sillett (2007) found M subsimilis, a new report for California, in the tops of Sequoia trees in
Humboldt County
Pseudocyphellaria perpetua (Miadlikowska et
Trang 7BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Tucker – New Reports
al 2002) was also found by Williams & Sillett
(2007) It is a foliose macrolichen, resembling P.
crocata except that P perpetua has a yellow medulla
(versus white in P crocata), and mostly marginal
soralia (laminal as well as marginal in P crocata)
Punctelia
Five species of the foliose lichen Punctelia can
be found in California, with P perreticulata being the
most common on bark (Egan & Aptroot 2004) Most
species have white dots or pores (pseudocyphellae)
on the upper surface Reports of P subrudecta in CA
are misidentifications of P perreticulata The
photograph in Brodo et al (2001, p 609), while
labeled as P subrudecta, is P perreticulata On rock
one finds Punctelia stictica, common on boulders on
Mt Tamalpais in Marin County, and P punctilla, on
the Channel Islands and mainland of Santa Barbara
County, at the Santa Barbara Botanic Garden
Punctelia borreri and P ulophylla also have been
reported in the state
L ITERATURE C ITED
Brodo, I.M., S.D Sharnoff, & S Sharnoff 2001
Lichens of North America Yale University
Press, New Haven
Carlberg, T & J Doell 2009 California lichens by
county compiled from field trip reports in the
Bulletin of the California Lichen Society
Bulletin of the California Lichen Society 15 (2):
30-42
Egan, R.S., & A Aptroot 2004 Punctelia, pp
431-436, in T H Nash III, B D Ryan, P Diederich,
C Gries, & F Bungartz (eds.), Lichen flora of
the Greater Sonoran Desert region, Vol 2
Lichens Unlimited, Arizona State University,
Tempe
Esslinger, T.L 2008 A cumulative checklist for the
lichen-forming, lichenicolous, and allied fungi of
the continental United States and Canada North
Dakota State University, http://www.ndsu
.nodak.edu/instruct/esslinge/chcklst/chcklst7.htm
(posted 18 January, 2008), Fargo, N.D
Esslinger, T.L, & R.S Egan 1995 A sixth checklist
of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous, and allied
fungi of the continental United States and
Canada The Bryologist 98: 467-549
Grube, M 2008 (2007) Arthonia, pp.39-61, in T H.
Nash III, C Gries, & F Bungartz (eds.), Lichen
flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert region, Vol
3 Lichens Unlimited, Arizona State University,
Tempe
McCune, B 1997 Ptychographa, a lichen genus
new to North America The Bryologist 100: 240
239-McCune, B 2002 Hypogymnia, pp 228-238, in T.
H Nash III, B D Ryan, C Gries, & F Bungartz(eds.), Lichen flora of the Greater SonoranDesert region, Vol 1 Lichens Unlimited,Arizona State University, Tempe
Miadlikowska, J., B McCune, & F Lutzoni 2002,
Pseudocyphellaria perpetua, a new lichen from
western North America The Bryologist 105: 10
1-Robertson, J 2002a Pygmy Forest field trip,Mendocino County, March 16, 2002, and list ofmacrolichens of the Pygmy Forest Bulletin ofthe California Lichen Society 9 (1): 8-12.Spribille, T., C.R Björk, S Ekman, J.A Elix, T.Goward, C Printzen, T Tønsberg, & T Wheeler
2009 Contributions to an epiphytic lichen flora
of northwest North America: 1 Eight newspecies from British Columbia inland rainforests The Bryologist 112(1): 109-137
Tucker, S.C., J Robertson, & S Altermann 2004.Lichen foray on the campus of University ofCalifornia, Santa Cruz, May 15-16, 2004.Bulletin of the California Lichen Society 11(2):48-53
Tucker, S.C & B.D Ryan 2006 Revised catalogue
of lichens, lichenicolous and allied fungi inCalifornia Constancea 84 (University ofCalifornia, Berkeley) Online (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/constancea/84/)
Westberg, M 2004 Candelariella, pp 46-53, in T H.
Nash III, B D Ryan, P Diederich, C Gries, & F.Bungartz (eds.), Lichen flora of the GreaterSonoran Desert region, Vol 2 LichensUnlimited, Arizona State University, Tempe
Westberg, M 2007a Candelariella (Candelariaceae)
in western United States and northern Mexico:the species with biatorine apothecia TheBryologist 110(3): 365-374
Westberg, M 2007b Candelariella (Candelariaceae)
in western United States and northern Mexico:the polysporous species The Bryologist 110 (3):375-390
Westberg, M 2007c Candelariella (Candelariaceae)
in western United States and northern Mexico:the eight-spored, lecanorine species TheBryologist 110(3): 391-419
Westberg, M., & T.H Nash 2002 Candelaria, pp 116-118, in T H Nash III, B D Ryan, C Gries,
& F Bungartz (eds.), Lichen flora of the Greater
Trang 8BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Tucker – New Reports
Sonoran Desert region, Vol 1 Lichens
Unlimited, Arizona State University, Tempe
Westberg, M., & T.H Nash 2008 (2007)
Candelariella, pp 378-380, in T H Nash III, C.
Gries, & F Bungartz (eds.), Lichen flora of the
Greater Sonoran Desert region, Vol 3 Lichens
Unlimited, Arizona State University, Tempe
Williams, C.B., & S Sillett 2007 Epiphyte
communities on redwood (Sequoia
semper-virens) in northwestern California The
Bryologist 110 (3): 420-452
Williams, C.B., & L Tibell 2008 Calicium
sequoiae, a new lichen species from
north-western California, U S A The Lichenologist40:185-194
Trang 9BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Perlmutter – Basic Lichenology
Basic Lichenology 2: Reproduction
Gary B PerlmutterUniversity of North Carolina HerbariumUniversity of North CarolinaChapel Hill, NC 27599-3280lushik aol.comLichens are incredibly diverse organisms, with a
documented catalogue of over 4400 species in North
America (Tucker & Ryan 2006) and more being
discovered all the time They are diverse in a variety
of characters, such as thallus type, substrate
preference and pollution tolerance One set of
characters that holds great variety involves modes of
reproduction Structure and anatomy of lichen
reproductive organs are also key toward lichen
identification
Lichens can reproduce vegetatively or sexually,
and often do both Vegetative means can involve
specialized organs such as soredia or isidia, or simply
through thallus fragmentation Sexual reproduction
typically involves the fungal partner only, and the
variety of fruiting bodies or ascomata (sing ascoma)
is mind-boggling Not only that, but their internal
anatomy such as tissue arrangement, spore sacs
(known as asci) and the spores themselves vary quite
a bit across species and higher orders of taxonomy
like genus, family, etc Overall, lichens of all types
can have any of these structures, and often in
combination Reproductive traits are usually species
specific, thus their usefulness in identification
Vegetative Reproduction
Soredia are minute dispersal packets consisting
of a few algal cells wrapped by fungal threads, and
often appear as pale granules Their placement on the
lichen thallus varies, and depending on species, they
can appear on the thallus surface, on lobe tips,
margins or in patches of broken cortex known as
soralia In some loop lichens (Hypotrachyna), the
thallus can form pustules that break open to release
soredia; these are known as schizidia Finally, the
soredia of some crustose lichens can even comprise
the entire thallus These latter lichens, such as those
in the genus Lepraria, are known as dust lichens
Isidia are small, finger-like extensions of the
thallus, which break off and disperse in the wind
They have a cortex, medulla and algal layer, and can
be globular, cylindrical or branched Many rock
shield lichens (Xanthoparmelia) use isidia to
propagate themselves Both soredia and isidia are
best seen with a hand lens, but soralia can be seenwith the naked eye
Fragmentation is often employed by lichens thatare brittle and tend to break apart when dry, like
many reindeer lichens (Cladonia spp formerly known as Cladina) One unusual microfoliose lichen
found in the tropics and eastern North America that
uses fragmentation exclusively is Flakea papillata.
Its minute lobes are dichotomously branched andvery thin, and thus flake off (hence the name).Lacking any reproductive organs, this species was notknown to be a lichen until the 1990s and went by thename “The Thing” as bryologists and lichenologistsstruggled to classify it (Perlmutter 2006) Only recent
molecular analysis has placed F papillata into a
lichen family (Muggia et al 2009)
Asci, Spores and the Fungal Sexual Life Cycle
While the vegetative propagules serve toreproduce the lichen as a whole organism, it does notleave the opportunity for genetic material to mix andproduce offspring that are genetically different Inlichens only the fungal partner reproduces sexually(the photobiont cells merely divide), and the wayfungi “do it” is distinct from that of plants andanimals, earning their placement in a separateKingdom In a word, fungal sex is weird
For starters, the thallus is haploid, meaning thatonly one set of chromosomes exist in any given cellnucleus We animals are diploid, with two sets ofchromosomes per nucleus, and only our eggs andsperm are haploid Plants are also diploid, but theyinvolve an alternation of generations with haploidstages of their life cycle growing as multicellularorganisms, largely hidden in cones, flowers or freelygrowing on the soil as in mosses and liverworts.From our animal viewpoint, fungi can be seen asbackwards in their lifecycle But it gets even stranger
The life cycle begins with a spore (haploid, or n),
which germinates into a hypha This hypha splits andgrows, captures an alga or cyanobacterium, and thecombination of partners triggers the fungus toproduce a lichen thallus When two adjacent thallimeet, they may merge Because of this merging, the
Trang 10BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Perlmutter – Basic Lichenology
concept of the individual is not really applicable to
lichens, for a single thallus can represent one
individual or an entire colony all merged into one
form That’s why we call “individual” lichens
“thalli” When a thallus matures, ascomata develop
and this is where the fungal sex happens
In fungi there is no male and female, but rather
type “a” and type “b” Another strange thing with
fungi is that their cells are multinucleated, resulting
from the breakdown of cell walls In the base of a
developing ascoma, a hypha from one of the types
develops into a multinucleated ascogonium, while
that of the other type into an antheridium, containing
an equal number of nuclei as the former These two
microscopic organs merge and share nuclei, which do
not themselves merge, but instead lie side by side in a
stage known as dikaryon (literally “two nuts”, or n +
n) The dikaryotic stage is a character that both sac
and mushroom fungi share and have probably
evolved from a common ancestor
From the dikaryotic ascogonium, ascogenous
hyphae develop, each composed of cells containing
nuclei from the two parents The nuclei then merge,
becoming fertilized like egg and sperm The resulting
diploid (2n) structure becomes the ascus, or sac, from
which the Ascomycota or sac fungi get their name
Inside the ascus meiosis occurs, mixing the genetic
material from the parent nuclei and producing four
daughter cells (n) These cells undergo one mitotic
division, resulting in the set of eight ascospores
typical of lichens Together the spores and the ascus
develop analogous to offspring inside a womb until
the spores are ejected from the ascus to be carried by
the wind
Anatomy of the Ascoma
Ascomata come in two major types: apothecia
(open cups) and perithecia (closed cups) Withinthese two types is a dazzling array of forms Tounderstand their variety we must describe theiranatomy
A typical ascoma, say that of a rim lichen
(Lecanora; Figure 1), has five tissues These are the
eiphymenium, hymenium, hypothecium, exciple andthalline rim The uppermost tissue of the cup is theepihymenium, which is made up of the tips of shortfungal threads known as paraphyses, and tips of asci.These tips are often swollen and in the case ofparaphyses sometimes branched Often there aregranules in this tissue that give the disk its color, andsometimes granules also lie on top, giving the disk afrosted look The outer granules are known as pruina;such a disk is described as pruinose
Under the eiphymenium lies the hymenium Animportant tissue, this is where the spores areproduced They develop in the asci, which aresupported in an upright position by the paraphyses.This is so that when spores are dispersed from theasci tips, they leave the ascoma More on asci andspore diversity below These organs take root in thehypothecium, a dense fungal tissue made up of highlybranched hyphae, including ascogenous hyphae.Surrounding these tissues is the exciple, whichfunctions as the outer wall When exposed, it usuallyappears as a thin rim the same color as the disk, such
as in many button lichens (Buellia) The exciple can
surround the disk like a cup, or just the base of it, orjust the sides and not extending below In peritheciathe exciple completely surrounds the ascoma, leavingonly a hole for spore release And surrounding theexciple is a thalline rim, composed of cortical,medullary and photobiont tissues The thalline rim, asthe name implies, is the same color as the thallus
Types of Ascomata
As noted above there are aplethora of ascomatal types,which vary in the compositionand arrangement of tissues justdescribed Many of these arefamily specific, and can bereadily observed in the field.Following is a tour of fruitingbody diversity
Arthonioid apothecia are
the simplest forms of apothecia(Figure 2A), with a poorlydeveloped exciple and nothalline rim Superficially theyare often very small, and canFigure 1
Trang 11BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Perlmutter – Basic Lichenology
vary from dot-like to star-like, but often are irregular
in shape These are typical of the Family
Arthoniaceae, also known as dot, comma or asterisk
lichens These lichens are crustose with very simple
thalli, and are considered a basal lichen branch
(Martin Grube, pers comm.)
Lecanorine apothecia (Figure 2B & 2C) are the
quintessential apothecia, with all tissues present and
fully developed They are the ascomata found on rim
lichens (f Lecanoraceae), shield lichens (f
Parmeliaceae) and others within the Order
Lecanoromycetes
Lirellae are elongated apothecia (Figure 2D),
often branched to starlike Lirellae are diagnostic of
the crustose script lichens (f Graphidaceae), also
known as graphids
Lecideine apothecia (Figure 2E) lack thalline
rims, but have prominent excipular rims The rims are
the same color as the disk, and are usually black (i.e.,
carbonized) In shape they are typically flat, but in
more mature apothecia of some species, the exciple is
overgrown by the hymenial tissues and appear
convex Button lichens (genus Buellia) and rock
tripes (Lasallia and Umbilicaria) are typical in
bearing these apothecia as well as many crustose taxa
that are often difficult to identify These latter crusts
bear the name “Little Black Dots”, not unlike the
“Damn Yellow Composites” of the sunflower family
(Asteraceae) that frustrate our botanist friends
Biatorine apothecia (Figure 2F) are similar to
lecideine ones, but are paler in color with the exciple
noncarbonized They are typical of crusts in the
genera Bacidia and Biatora.
Maezedia are a specialized type of ascoma with
tissues so reduced that only a mass of loose spores
are seen Maezedia are usually stalked and are
diagnostic of the minute “stubble lichens” (e.g.
Calicium, Chaenothecopsis), which are themselves
indicative of healthy environments
In thelotremoid or “double-walled” apothecia
the thalline wall is separated from the exciple and is
termed a columella (Figure 2G) These are
characteristic of the largely tropical family
Thelotremataceae, known as barnacle or volcano
lichens (Note: thelotremoid lichens have just been
recognized to lie within the Graphidaceae through
molecular analysis, but the taxonomic change has not
yet been made [Papong et al 2009].)
Pertusarioid apothecia – The thalline margin is
thick and wart-like, covering the apothecium with
only a pore (ostiole) for spore release (Figure 2H)
Warts can contain one to several apothecia, each
distinguished by its ostiole The crustose Wart
Lichens (f Pertusariaceae: Pertusaria) are
characterized by pertusarioid apothecia
Perithecia – These are a type of ascoma largely
buried in the thallus in which the exciple has nearlyfully enveloped the inner tissues, leaving only anostiole for spore release (Figures 2I & 2J) Whilefound in separate evolutionary lines of sac fungi, itappears that this ascoma type has evolved from theopen condition of apothecia (Liu & Hall 2004).Perithecia usually appear as convex black fruitingbodies with an ostiole at the apex, although there aredeviations in this body plan They may be separate orgrouped; the groupings may be in thalline tissue in astructure called the pseudostroma (as in
Trypethelium), or the perithecia may be fused to form
one exipular mass with several ostioles This lattercondition is known as compound perithecia and is
characteristic of Mycoporum Most perithecial
lichens are crustose and represent several families;
but some, such as stipplescales (Dermatocarpon), are
squamulose
Pycnidia and Conidia
Resembling small perithecia are pycnidia, shaped reproductive bodies that produce asexualspores called conidia Like ascomata, pycnidia serve
flask-to reproduce only the fungal partner of the lichen.Conidia are produced by the budding of specializedhyphae inside a pycnidium and can appear in largenumbers Appearing as tiny black dots, pycnidia can
be produced on lichens bearing apothecia orperithecia, and in the latter they are distinguished inthe field by their smaller size Internally, pycnidia aredistinguished by lacking ascomatal tissues, and theconidia are generally smaller than spores, one celleach and colorless, and far more numerous
Asci and Ascospores
Both the asci and the spores they contain varyfrom species to species, and can even distinguishgenera or goups of higher taxonomic order Asci canvary in size, shape and details of their tips, where thespores eject from In arthonioid genera such as
Arthonia and Arthothelium, these are balloon-shaped,
whereas those of other genera may be either shaped or cylindrical Asci may contain one orseveral layers of walls, which function in sporerelease The tips of asci are typically thickened, andthis thickened part is termed the tholus Parts of thetholus and the ascal walls variously stain blue withiodine, which is important in keying of many lichens,especially crusts As the ascus and the spores insidemature, pressure builds inside, until the tip breaks,
Trang 12club-BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA LICHEN SOCIETY 16 (1), 2009 Perlmutter – Basic Lichenology
Figure 2 Ascomata A) Arthonioid apothecia B) Lecanorine apothecia C) Lecanorine in cross-section D)Lirellae E) Lecidine apothecia F) Biatorine apothecia G) Thelotremoid apothecia H) Pertusarioid apothecia
I and J) Perithecia Photography by Gary B Perlmutter (A, B, D, E, G, and H) and Mikki McGee (C, F, I, and J).Figure printed in color on back cover