Mesosoma very short medially, anterior edge with twoor threepairs oflateralsetae transverse ridge; propodeum with width of median panels about 1.6X their length Figs 17-19,plicaeand me
Trang 1BANKS, D Male nest defense in the digger wasp Cerceris binodis (Hymenoptera:
CARVER, M Euryischomyia Girault (Hymenoptera:Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae: Eriaporinae:
Apoidea:Sphecidae: Pemphredoninae),part 1 204
GESS, F. W. Descriptionsof themaleof Riekia nocatunga Richards,themale and two
strik-ingly distinctsympatric colourformsof Riekia confluens (Snelling)and themaleof
Rolandia angulata (Richards) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Masarinae) from
GESS,F. W.,S K. GESSand R.W. GESS AnAustralian masarine, Rolandia angulata
(Rich-ards) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): nestingand evaluation of association with
GOKHMAN,V E. and D L. J. QUICKE. The last twenty yearsof parasitic Hymenoptera
HEYDON,S L. Areviewof theNorthAmericanspecies of ThinodytesGrahamand Mauleus
Graham (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) 1
LATTKE,J E. Revisionof the ant genus Gnamptogenys in the New World (Hymenoptera:
PULAWSKI, W J. The wasp genusTachytella Brauns, 1906 (Hymenoptera:Sphecidae) . 121
Trang 2INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF HYMENOPTERISTS
Organized 1982;Incorporated 1991
OFFICERS FOR1995DonaldL.J. Quicke,President
JamesM Carpenter,President-Elect
MichaelE Schauff, Secretary
JohnT.Huber, Treasurer
PaulM Marsh, Editor
Subject Editors
Eric Grissell,Robert Matthews, WojciechPulawski,David Rosen,Mark Shaw
Allcorrespondenceconcerning Society businessshould be mailedto theappropriateofficer at the
following addresses: President,DepartmentofBiology, Imperial College atSilwoodPark, Ascot,
BerksSL5 7PY, England;President-Elect,DepartmentofEntomology,AmericanMuseumof
Nat-ural History,CentralParkWestat79thStreet,NewYork,NewYork10024; Secretary,Systematic
D.C 20560; Treasurer, BiologicalResourcesDivision,CLBRR, AgricultureCanada, K.W Neatby
Building,Ottawa,Ontario,Canada KIA0C6;Editor, P.O.Box384,NorthNewton,Kansas67117
ento-mology Annual dues for members are $25.00 (U.S. currency) per year, payable to The tionalSociety ofHymenopterists.Requests for membership should besent to theTreasurer (ad-dress above)
Interna-Journal The Journal is published once a yearby the International Society of Hymenopterists,
% DepartmentofEntomologyNHB168,SmithsonianInstitution,Washington,D.C 20560, U.S.A
MembersingoodstandingreceivetheJournal ofHymenopteraResearch.Nonmembersubscriptionsare$50.00 (U.S. currency)per year.
TheSocietydoesnotexchange itspublicationsforthose of othersocieties.
Please see inside backcover ofthis issue forinformation regarding
preparation of manuscripts
Statementof Ownership
Title of Publication:Journal ofHymenopteraResearch
Frequency of Issue: Oncea year(currently).
Location of Office of Publication, BusinessOffice ofPublisherand Owner: International Society
ofHymenopterists,%DepartmentofEntomology,NHB168,SmithsonianInstitution,Washington,
D.C.20560, U.S.A
Editor:Paul M Marsh,P. O.Box384,North Newton, Kansas67117.
Trang 3Vol 4, 1995,pp 1-24
A Review of the North American Species of Thinodytes Graham and
Mauleus Graham (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)
Steven L. Heydon
BohartMuseum, Department ofEntomology, Universityof California,
Davis,CA 95616-8584 USA
Abstract.—The
Halticoptera-group isdefinedascontaining thosepteromaline pteromalid genera
with a reticulate body, acarinate pronotal collar, weakly developed notauli, weakly delimitedfrenum, propodeum with the median carina and plicae connected posteriorly by a W-shaped
carina, petiolewithabasalflange,andthehind marginof the first gastral tergitesinuouslaterallyand usually emarginate medially. Genera included in this group are Halticoptera Spinola, Halti- copterina Erdos, AndersenaBoucek, Thinodytes Graham,Syntomopiis Walker,MauleusGraham, and
Ploskana Boucek Thinodytes and Mauleus are revised for the Nearctic region and keys to the
world's describedspecies are given. New species include T caroticus n. sp., T cyzicopsis n sp.,
T petiolatus n sp.,M cultratus n. sp.,M iligneus n.sp., andM venetus n. sp. Polycystus nigritusHoward is transferred toMauleus as M nigritus n. comb, and Gastrancistrus cephalon Walker is
transferred to Thinodytes as T cephalon n. comb BubekiafallaxGahann syn issynonymizedwith
T.
cephalon Walker
INTRODUCTION are Notoglyptus Masi, Sphegigaster
Spino-la, and Schimitschekia Boucek
de-^ ^^^ Thinodytes and Mauleus, thefined as containing those pteromaline North American species ofall the genera
sculptured, pronotalcollar acarmate(Figs
Nearctic region were recently reviewed
21, 22), notauli weakly developed (Figs ^^ ^^e currently being studied. Andersena
21, 22),frenum weakly delimited(Figs 21, includes
only one species (Boucek 1993)
peti-i^gHalticoptera The worldspecies of
Si/n-rected lateral andventral flange (Figs
20), and hind margin of first gastral ter- by Heydon (1988),'Heydon (1993), and
emar-Heydon and LaBerge (1988), respectively,
ginate medially (Figs 21, 22). Genera of This
this group include Halticopitera Spinola, of Thinodytes and Mauleus [Ploskana was
by Boucek (1976).] Research by
Thinodytes Graham, Syntomopus Walker, the author has revealed the presence of
Ploskana Boucek, and Mauleus Graham, numerous species ofboth thesegenera in
characteristics of the Halticoptera-group
Thinodytes previously contained two and which probably are more or less described species, the Palearctic species
to the Halticoptera-^roup T. and the
Trang 4Carib-Journal of
Figs 1-10 1, Thinodytescaroticus n.sp., female hind leg;2, Thinodytes cephalon (Walker), 2, female hindleg;
3, 4, Thinodytes cyzicopsisn. sp., femaleheaddorsal view, 4,maleantenna; 5, 6, Thinodytes petiolatusn. sp., 5,
femalehead dorsal view, 6, maleantenna; 7, Thinodytes cyzicus n. sp., femalehead dorsal view; 8, Mauleus
cultratus n.
sp., female habitus; 9, Mauleusiligneus n.
sp., female antenna; 10, Mauleusvenetus n. sp.,female antenna.
bean species T. clypeatus (Girault) 1918
To these I add the New World species T.
cephalon (Walker) 1843, n. comb., and
de-scribe four new Nearctic species—T
car-oticus n. sp., T.
cyzicopsis n. sp., T.
petiol-atus n. and T. santerna n sp Mauleus
was created for the species M. maderensisGraham, 1981 from Madeira However,this species is associated with plants na-tiveto Mexico and is suspected to be na-
Trang 5Figs 11-16. 11,Thinodytes
petiolatus n sp., female clypeus; 12, Thinodyies cephahn (Walker), femaleclypeus;
13, Maiik'iis iligueus n sp.,male clypeus; 14, Synlomopiisamerkanus Ashmead, femalehead dorsal view; 15,
Maidens iligneiisn.
sp., male headposterior aspect; 16, Halticoptera sp.,male head posterior aspect.
species is given more credence by the new Nearctic species— M. cultratus n. sp.,
/('HSspecies,M. ///^^r/fj/s (Howard), 1897n. These three new species are describedcomb, andthe author's of three herein
Trang 6Figs. 17-22. 17, Tliinodijtes ceplmlon (Walker), femalepropodeumandpetiole; 18, Tlunodi/tes ci/zicopsis n.sp.,male
propodeumandpetiole; 19, Tlii)iodi/tes petiolatiisn.sp., femalepropodeum andpetiole; 20, 21, Maidensdigneusn.
sp., 20,malepropodeumandpetiole, 21, female habitus; 22, Syntomopus arpedesHeydon,female habitus.
METHODS ^\^ jg used instead of clava In addition,
pet-used instead of hollow and iole. The are used:
Trang 7the median ocellar diameter is MOD, the
ocellar-ocular distance is OOL, the
poste-rior ocellar distance is POL, the lateral
plate sensilla are MPP sensilla, the lower
ocular line is LOcL, and the antennal
measurements given in the descriptions
can be converted to millimeters by
multi-plying by 0.02. The acronyms for the
mu-seums from whichmaterial was borrowed
are listed in the acknowledgments section.
TJiinodytes Graham
Dicydus Thomson, 1876:221, 253. Typespecies:
Miscogaster cyzicus Walker, 1839:200; by
because ofDicydusWalker, 1833:371, 455.
Thinodytes Graham, 1956:261. Type species:
MiscogastercyzicusWalker, 1839:200;by
orig-inal designation (examined) Peck, Boucek,
and Hoffer, 1964:41. Graham, 1969:150, 167.
Hedqvist, 1975:167. Dzhanokmen, 1978:82.
BoucekandRasplus, 1991:32.
Description.— Body color
sculp-turing sometimes smooth on frenum (T.
cyzicopsis, T. petiolatiis, and T. santenm)
and median panels ofpropodeum(T.
san-terna); petiole alveolate in species with
smooth in species with transverse petiole
(Fig 17); gastral tergites nearly smooth
Clypeus variable, with either three
asym-metrically arranged denticles (Fig. 11) (T.
cyzicopsis, T. cyzicus, T. petiolatiis), three
san-terna and T.
clypeatus)orwithsinglebroad
(T. cephalon and T caroticus). Head with
short genal concavity often present;
anten-naltorulusabove LOcL Antennawith
for-mula 1:1:2:6:3; scape cylindrical, slender;
length of flagellum plus pedicelof female
less than head width (subequal in length
in T.
cyzicopsis),equaltoorslightlygreater
than head width in male; funicular
mentscylindrical; MPP sensilla usually in
length of funicularsegment (Figs 4, 6);
terminal segment, except T. cephalon with
terminal spine and large patch of
micro-pilosity. Male maxilla with stipites larged; palps slender (Fig 15). Mesosoma
very short medially, anterior edge
with twoor threepairs oflateralsetae
transverse ridge; propodeum with width
of median panels about 1.6X their length
(Figs 17-19),plicaeand mediancarina tinct and connected posteriorly by W-
dis-shaped carina (Figs 17-19), basal foveasometimes bordered mesally by short
straightcarina (Fig. 17) (T. clypeatus,T.
zicopsis, and T. cephalon), or by long sinu-ous carina (Figs 18, 19) (T. cyzicopsis, T cyzicus, and T. petiolatiis); spiracles ovate
vein sometimes distinctly shorter (T. oticus and T. cephalon); stigma small, but
car-itsheighthalfthedistancebetweenstigmaand anterior wing margin in T. clypeatus;
three partial distal setal rows; basal cell
bareexceptsometimesa fewsetae distally
(T clypK^atus and T.
cyzicus);basal vein
se-tose except in T. cephalon; speculum
an-teriorlydirected lamellate flange(Figs
trans-verse, unsclerotized ventrally, and out lateral setae (Fig. 17) (T caroticus, T.
with-cephalon, and T. santcrna), or quadrate to
elongate and sclerotized ventrally (7
cly-peatus, T. cyzicopsis, T. cyzicus, and T
pe-lateral setae sometimes
Trang 8Journal of
(Fig. 19) (T cyzicopsis and T. petiolatus);
weak median carina present in T.
clypea-tiis. Gaster offemaleovate, acuminate
api-cally, 1.4-1.8X as long as wide;
hind margin of Tl sinuous laterally and
Discussion.—
separate Thinodytes from the other genera
of the Halticoptera-group, particularly
Hal-ticoptera, Maiileus, and Si/ntomopiis, is
im-possible because Thinodytes is what is left
when the more distinct genera of the
Hal-ticoptera-group are characterized.
Apomor-phiccharactersamongrelatedgenera
com-mon to all Thinodytes species such as the
reticulatebody, weakly developed notauli,
poorly delimited frenum,propodeumwith
with a basal bracingconsisting of an
ante-riorly directed lateral and ventral flange,
and thehindmarginofthefirstgastral
charac-ters defining the Hnlticoptera-group itself.
American species, some described and
some not, that fit within the present
defi-nition of Thinodytes. Once these are
inves-tigated, it may be possible to divide
Thi-nodytes intomonophyletic generic units.
Halticopteraisdistinguishedfrom
states including a bidentate clypeus, the
antennal torulus located at or below the
LOcL, the scape usually nonmetallic, the
male maxilla with lamellately expanded
palps andusually withanother lobe onthe
stipites, and a median longitudinal carina
on the petiole. Thinodytes has the clypeus
of clypeal denticles, butno known
Thinod-ytes species has a bidentate clypeus Theantennal torulus in Thinodytes is located
distinctly abovethe LOcL (except in T.
tiolatus),and thescape usuallyhasmetalliccoloration The male maxilla of Thinodytes
lobes on the stipites. Thinodytes clypeatus is
the only species of Thinodytes that has a
median carina on the petiole. Halticoptera
species are commonly bright metallicgreen; those of Thinodytes areusually dark
by thebidentate clypeus (Fig 13), the
(Figs 8, 21), the median panels of the
pro-podeum short (2X as wide as long) (Fig 20), and the lateral flanges of the petiole
enlarged and thickened (Fig. 20). In
meso-somaisdistinctlylower thanthe vertex, the
median panels of thepropodeum are
lon-ger (Figs. 17-19), and the basal flanges of
the petiole are lamellate (Figs. 17-19)
(lengthabout V3 its width) (Fig 22), threebroad symmetrically arranged clypealdenticles (Fig 14), and usuallya flattened
Thi-nodytes is much shorter, those Thinodytesspecies having symmetrically arrangeddenticles have them fingerlike rather than
nev-er so flattened as it usually is in
Syntomo-pus species
Biology.— The knownhosts of Thinodytes
species are all small Diptera living in
plants as leaf or stem miners
KEYTO HOLARCTICSPECIESOF THINODYTES GRAHAM
- Petiole as
2. Scape andlegsbeyondcoxaepale,nonmetallic.Frenumandmedianpanelsofpropodeumsmooth Plicae rounded and smoothly convergent santema
Trang 9- Hind margin of Tl entire medially Dark bands on tibiae with diffuse borders (Fig. 2).
Female clubwithterminal spineatapex cephalon (Walker)
4. Clypeal denticles symmetrically arranged Petiole with weak median carina. Ovipositor
-Clypealdenticles asymmetrically arranged, the mediandenticle displaced to the left
(Fig.
11) Petiolewithout a median carina (Figs 18-19). Ovipositor sheaths hardly exserted 5
5. Costalcell withthreerowsof setaedistally. Eye length<4X as longas the templelength
(Fig 5). Body moreor less alldark cyzicus (Walker)
- Costalcell with two rowsof setaedistally.Eye length >4X aslongas the temple (Figs 3, 7). Body dark with diffuse metallic patcheson head and mesosoma 6
6. Male with terminal segment of funicle appearing as wide or wider than long (Fig 4).
Petiole usually less than 1.7X as longas wide (Fig. 18). Female withpetiole usually less
than 1.5X aslong aswide Bothsexes withhind margins ofTl and T2 as long medially
aslaterally, (eastern United Statesand Canada) cyzicopsis n. sp.
- Males withterminal
segmentof funicleappearinglonger thanwide(Fig.6).Petioleusuallymore than 1.7x as long as wide Female with petiole usually more than 1.5x as long as
wide (Fig. 19). Both sexes with hind margins ofTl and T2 usually longer laterally than
Thinodytes caroticus Heydon, new species
(Fig 1)Holotype, female.—Color:
wing veins brown; pretarsi black; knees,
apical K; of tibiae, middle and hind tarsi
white, border between the light ends and
dark median band oftibiae sharp (Fig 1).
alveo-late; median panels of propodeum
ob-scurely alveolate.
10);anteriormargin ofclypeus with single
genal concavity; eye height 1.2X length
(10:8); 2.0X malar distance (10:5), eye
length 4.0X temple length (8:2); ratio of
MOD, OOL, POL, LOL as 2.0:3.0:6.5:3.0;
vertexroundingregularly into occiput;
to-rulus Vi own diameter above LOcL
An-tenna with of
lengths of scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6,club as 6.5:2.5:0.5:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:5.0;
segment simple apically, with
length 1.3X width(25:19);dorsellum shortsmooth band; propodeum with basal fo-
an-teriormarginofmedianpanels,withshort
weak longitudinal carina crossing groove
with spiracles on anterior margin of
car-inate anteriorly. Fore wing with ratio of
lengths of submarginal, marginal,
post-marginal, stigmal veins as19.0:11.5:9.0:5.0;
with row of 4 setae. Petiole conical, verse, smooth, with mediancarina Gasterfusiform, length 1.8X width (30.0:16.5);hind margin of Tl emarginate medially;ovipositor sheaths hardly exserted; hypo-
Trang 10Journal of
Allotype, male.—Color
pattern similar to
blue; fore tarsi palebrown; pale portions
of legs pale yellow-brown instead of
white Body length1.2 mm Antennawith
length of pedicel plus flagellum 0.98X
head width (21.0:21.5); relative lengths of
scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6, and club as
6.0:2.5:0.5:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:6.0; widths
of Fl, F6,clubas2.5:3.0:3.0;funicularsetae
sparse, reclinate.Gasterovate,length 1.5X
width (23:15).
Variation.— The body length of females
examined varied between 1.2and 1.8 mm
color ofthe dorsumof themesosoma
darkbands onthelegsarealwaysdistinct,
but the intensity of their metallic
colora-tionis variable
Discussion.—Thinodi/tes caroticus most
closelyresemblesT. cephalon becauseboth
species are dark in color; have a single,
broad,asymmetricallyplaced clypeal
den-ticle; and have smooth, transverse
peti-oles.Thinodytescaroticus differsfromT
ce-phalon in the following: 1. The hind
straight in T. cephalon 2. Thebasal vein of
the fore wing is setose in T caroticus, but
bare in T. cephalon 3. The median panels
in T caroticus, but distinctly alveolate in
T.
car-oticus,but about%the gastrallength in T.
cephalon 5. The dark bands on the tibiae
are distinct with sharp borders in T
caro-ticus,butare lessdistinctand havediffuse
tibialcolorbandsareuniquetoT.caroticus
and will identify the species at a glance
(Fig 1).
Etymology.— The species name comes
from the Greek karotikos, meaning
stupe-fying orsoporific,and refers tothe general
nondescript appearanceof this species.
Type Material.— The holotype, allotype
(bothUCDC) and one male were
all reared by the author from the leaf
mines ofCalycomyzapromissa (Frick)
(Dip-tera: Agromyzidae) collected 30 June 1985
Illinois, near Champaign, Illinois.
Fifty-nine additional paratypes seen were
UCDC, USNM): Bermuda DEVONSHIRE
male FAGOT PARISH: Berry Hill Road,29.VI.1988, 2 females, 3 males; Botanical
Marsh, 29.VI.1988, 1 female SMITHS
fe-male Canada ONTARIO: Chatham, 1952
male United States. CALIFORNIA:
Haw-thorne, IX.1940 (ex Aster blotch), 3 males, 1 male;Jepson Prairie Preserve (13
fe-km s. Dixon), 20.V.1983, 1 female; Lake
(bred fromdipterousleafminer),1 female;
pus-ilia{prob.= Liriomyzapusilla)],1 female;
So-quel, 26.VIII.1948 (ex Agromyza sp.), 2 males, 1 male; 11 km e St. Helena (Lake
fe-male, 7.IX.1991 (on Heraculeum), 1 male; 6
West-wood Hills (Los Angeles County),
5.XI.1940 (ex serpentineleafminer in
Zin-nia),4 females, 1 male.FLORIDA:
{proh.= Liriomyzapusilla)],1 male; ville, 2 females GEORGIA: Savannah,
Jackson-5.VI.1943 (parasite of goldenrod
leafmin-er), 3 females ILLINOIS: South Farms ofthe University of Illinois, 19.V.1985, 1 fe-
male; White Heath, 24.IX.1939, 1 female
INDIANA:4 miless.New Harmony
(Har-mony State Park), 28.VI 1983, 2 females; 2miles s. New Lisbon, 14 VII.1981, 1 male
IOWA: SiouxCity (reared from leafminer
(rearedfrom mineofleafon sunflower), 1female KANSAS: Lawrence, 14.V.1955, 1
Trang 1126.VII.1960, 1 female NEW MEXICO:
19 IX.1905 (on Grindelia squarrosa (Pursk)
27.IX.1905 [ex dipterousleafminer of
(Com-positae)], 2 females; Roma, 26 III.1948 (ex
pupa of dipterous leaf miner), 3 females,
3 males
Biology.—This species has been reared
from leaf-mining Agromyzidae, mostly
Ca-lycomyza promissa (Prick) and Liriomyza
pusilla (Meigen) BecauseL pusilla is a
Pa-learctic agromyzid species (Spencer 1976)
and isnotknown from theNearctic region
(Spencer and Steyskal 1986), it is likely
that this host record is in error. There is
one record from Chatham, Ontario from
also reared from leaf miners on
Machaer-antheraannua, Zinnia,goldenrod,
sunflow-er, and "Aster" It has been reared from
both linear-mining and blotch-making
leaf miners Other plant associations of a
more uncertain nature include the
com-posites Baccharis sp., Heracleum sp., and
Grindelia squarrosa
Thinodytesclypeatus (Girault)
Polycystus clypeatus Girault, 1918:128.Holotype,
female (USNM); Hym. TypeNo. 20682;
(ex-amined)
Thinodytes clypeatus (Girault): Heydon, 1989:
193.
Redescription.—
Mesosoma, petiole black, with blue tints
dark brown; legs with basal % of femora
brown, remainderof legs white
Sculpture: Dorsum of mesosoma
panels of propodeum weakly alveolate;
petiole alveolate
Structure: Head withanterior marginof
LOcL Antenna with and widths
19.5X3.6: pedicel 6.0x4.5: annelli 2.6x3.6:
P54.6X6.8: F6missing: club 13.4X6.8; club
rather flat, length 1.4X width (33:24);
2), sides converging posteriorly; notauli
pairs oflateral setae, frenum almost
indis-tinguishablefrom remainderofscutellum;
0.45X width,withrowoffoveae separated
by carinae along anterior margin, spiracle
a raised smooth crescent Fore wing with
relative lengths ofsubmarginal, marginal,postmarginal, stigmal veins as 21:12:11:6;
cell with one seta; basal vein with three
setae. Petiolelength 1.2X width (6:5);withweak median carina; lacking lateral setae.Gaster fusiform, length 1.7X width (31.0:18.5); Tl emarginate medially; hypopy-
ovi-positor sheaths exserted for length equal
to thatof T7
Discussion.— The
removed and crushed on a slide.
Thinod-ytes clypeatus differs from all other scribed Thinodytes species because it has
sheaths, and a median carina on the
peti-ole. Thinodytes clypeatus has three metrically arranged denticles like Synto-mopusspecies,but T. clypeatus differsfrom
denticles ofT. clypeatusarefingerlikelobes
like those of the other Thinodytes species
withthree denticles,whereasthedenticles
triangular (Fig 14). The pronotal collarof
Thinodytes clypeatus is short, eleven times
aswideas long;the pronotalcollar in
as long (Fig 22). Most species oftera have a median carina on the petiole,but there are no other characters to indi-
Trang 12Halticop-10 Journal of
cate a particularly close relationship
be-tween T. clypeatus and Halticoptera.
DistributionandBiology.— Thetype
spec-imen wasrearedfroma leafminer oncorn
West Indies by F. Watts De Santis (1979)
reports this species from Barbados also,
andgives thenameofitshostasAgromyza
parvicornis Loew (Diptera: Agromyzidae).
Thinodytes cephnlon (Walker),
new combination
Figs 1, 17
?Pteromnlus Rhseo Walker, Walker 1839b:88-89
Lectotype, female (BMNH); Hym. Type No.
5.772 (examined).
Gastmncistrus cephalon Walker 1843:30
Lecto-type, male (BMNH); Hym. Type No. 5.661
(examined)
Bubekiafallax Gahan, 1933:114-116 Holotype,
female(USNM); TypeNo 44841 (examined)
Allen and Painter, 1937:225. Nikol'skaya,
1937:25. Peck, 1951:538.Thompson,1958:587.
Peck, 1963:610-611 Morrill and Kieckhefer,
1971:1130. Allen and Pienkowski, 1973:616,
617. Burks, 1979:789. Hendrickson, 1979:300,
302 n syn.
Discussion.—Thinodytes cephalon iseasily
distinguished by its single broad clypeal
denticle, apical spine on the female club,
notauli traceable tothehind marginofthe
mesoscutum asimpressed lines,bare
dor-sal vein, smooth and short petiole (Fig.
17), and first gastral tergite having the
hind margin entire.
A possible seniorsynonym of T.
cephal-on isPteromalus rhaeo describedfrom
(designated herein) ofP. rhaeo is
unfortu-nately missingthehead. Itappearssimilar
which many specimens in my collection
Island, but it is
significantly larger than
any other specimen examined The
medi-anpanelsofthepropodeuminP. rhaeoare
entirely rugose and the plicae are
poste-riorly divergent In other T. cephalon
ru-gae which are located mostly posteriorly,
and the plicae are parallel. Thehind tibia
in P. rhaeo is almost uniform in color; in
T. cephalon, the hind tibia are distinctly
Pter-omalus rhaeo may be within the range of
variation of what is recognized as T
ce-phalon,but I am reluctant to formally
syn-onymize the name until more is known
Distribution.—Thinodytes cephalon is one
ex-tends throughout most of North and
Biology.—Thinodytes cephalon is a
para-sitoid of dipterous larvaethat mine leaves
or grass stems Thinodytes cephalon was
has also been reared from the wheat stem
(Dip-tera: Chloropidae), ina numberofstudies(Gahan 1933; Allen and Painter 1937; andMorrill and Kieckhefer 1971). Allan andPainter report that T. cephalon probably
ovipositsinto the larval stage ofthis host.
One additional host added herein is
Lir-iomyza trifoliearumSpencer(Diptera:
Thinodytescyzicopsis Heydon,
new speciesFigs 3, 4, 18
Holotype, female.—Color: Head,
mesoso-ma black with metallic green patches as
follows: entire dorsellum, pairs of spotsalongsidemedianocellus,lateralhind cor-
ners of pronotum and upper epimeron;metallic blue patches as follows: on inner
orbits, anterior part of lateral lobe of
scu-tum and propodeum Antennawithscape,
pedicel dark blue;flagellumblack Petioleblack Casterbrownishblackwithmetallicblue reflections dorsally, green ventrally
black with weak blue
Trang 13re-flections; trochanters, femora brownish
black with weak green reflections, knees
yellow, tibiae with diffuse-edged dark
tarsi brown; middle and hind tarsi with
pretarsi black, remainder yellow.
Sculpture: Head, mesosoma, regularly
propo-deumshallowlyandindistinctly alveolate;
petiole finely alveolate
width 1.2X height(27:22),2.2X length(27:
12); anterior marginofclypeus with three
minute asymmetrically arranged apical
denticles; genal concavity absent; eye
height 1.4X length (13:9), 1.9X malar
dis-tance (13:7), length4.5X temple length (9:
2) (Fig 3); ratio ofMOD, OOL, POL, LOL
as 2.5:4.0:7.0:3.0; vertex rounding
above LOcL Antennawith length of
ped-icel plus flagellum l.Ox head width (27:
27); relative lengths of scape, pedicel,
an-nelli, Fl-6, club as 11.0:3.0:1.0:2.5:3.0:2.75:
2.75:2.5:2.5:7.0; widths of Fl, F6, club as
3.0:3.5:3.5, Fl^ appearing quadrate, F5-6
slightly transverse; club simple apically,
with minute patchof micropilosityon
dorsal-ly, length 1.6X width (36:22); pronotum
with humeral angles squared;
bandlike, short, weakly alveolate;
propo-deum with basal fovea bordered mesally
weakly carinate anteriorly; spiracle <
of propodeum. Fore wing with ratio of
lengths of submarginal, marginal,
post-marginal, stigmal veins as 25:13:14:8;
more than stigmal vein width; basal cell
bare;basalveinsetose Petiole length 1.2X
width (6:5); without median carina; with
one pair of lateral setae. Gaster length
1.4X width (31:22); hypopygium
sheaths hardly exserted.
male.—Color similar to
holo-type except frons blue, mesoscutum with
a pair of large diffuse green spots; axilla
green Bodylength 1.3 mm Antenna(Fig.4) with length of pedicel plus flagelluml.Ox head width (24:23); relative lengths
ofscape,pedicel, annelli, Fl-6, clubas 7.0: 3.0:1.0:2.0:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2:6.5; widthsof Fl,F6, club as 2.0:2.5:2.5; setae fine, reclinate.Petiole length 1.2X width (5:4)(Fig. 18).Gaster ovate, length 1.2X width (20.0: 16.5).
Variation.— The body color varies from
in-tensity, size, number, and hue of the tallic spots on the body are highly vari-
me-able.Thecolor of the metallicpatches
blue-green The body length ranges between
mm in males The length of the marginal
veinvaries from0.9 to 1.2times the length
about equal its length [x=1.02±
the petiole are sometimes difficult to see
flanges of the petiole.
Discussion.-Thinodytes cyzicopsis
resem-bles the Palearctic species T. cyzicus
the following: 1. Thinodytes cyzicopsis has
a series of metallic patches on the body,
whichare lackingin T cyzicus 2.Theratio
of the eye length to temple length ages 4.25±0.12 (n=6, range 3.8^.5) in fe-male T. cyzicofisis (Fig. 3) but measured
cell of the fore wing of T.
cyzicopsis has
two rows of setae distally, whereas there
arethree rows distally in the costal cellofT.
cyzicus. 4. The petiole has a pair of
lat-eral setae in T.
cyzicopsis, which are
Trang 14Journal of
Thinodytescyzicopsisand T.
petiolatus are
verysimilarspeciesand specimens cannot
twospecies aredistinctfromother
Thinod-ytes in their commonpossession of a
sim-ilarpatternof metallicpatchesonthehead
and mesosoma. Individuals ofT.cyzicopsis
differfromthoseofT petiolatus in the
fol-lowing: 1. Theratio ofeye heighttomalar
1.74±0.035 (n=8, range 1.5-1.8) infemales
males;inT petiolatus theratiois1.48±0.23
1.77±0.038 (n=10, range 1.6 to 2.0) in
males 2. All funicular segments of the
T cyzicopsis; all funicular segments are
usually longer than wide in male T
pe-tiolatus 3. The ratio of petiole length to
gas-tral tergite in T. cyzicopsis isabout as long
shortermedially than laterallyin T.
petiol-atus 5. The hind margin of T2 is straight
to just noticeably concave in T.
cyzicopsis,whereas it is usually distinctlyconcave in
T. petiolatus. 6. The terminal segment of
slightlytransversein T.
cyzicopsis,whereas
it
ad-dition to these structural characters, T.
from Kouchibouquac National Park, New
1977 by S. J. Miller The allotype (USNM)
col-lectedon vernalalfalfa on 22June 1968by
A G.Wheeler.Sixteenparatypeswere
Canada ALBERTA: Elkwater Lake,
fe-male NEW BRUNSWICK:
Phy-tobia {Calycomyza)solidaginison Solidago], 1male; Crosby, 31.VII.1952 (on apple), 1
(swept from Salix hlanda), 1 male,
29.VI.1972 (swept from Salix blanda), 3
males, 24 VII.1972 (swept from Salix
21.VII.1947, 1 female, 25.VII.1947 (swept
from Rosa rugosa), 1 female, 9.VIII.1945, 1female United States. ILLINOIS: 2 miles
Farms of the University of Illinois, nr.Champaign, 23.VI.1981, 1 male MASSA- CHUSETTS: Hopkinton, 9.VIII.1951 (ex
Ilex leaf miner), 1 female NEW MEXICO:
VIR-GINIA: Winchester, 16.VI.1964, 1 male,
be-tween T. cyzicopsis and T cyzicus.
Biology.— Known hosts of T. cyzicopsis
include Phytobia {Calycomyza) solidaginis
(Composi-tae)] and anIlexleafminer.Thespecieshas
(Salica-ceae), Rosa rugosa (Rosaceae), and alfalfa Salixand Rosa are probablyprimarily nec-
tarsourcesbecauseneitherhasmany
leaf-mining agromyzids, but these plants are
Thinodytes cyzicus (Walker)
Miscogaster cyzicus Walker, 1839a:200.
Lecto-type,female(BMNH); Hym.TypeNo.5.2570(examined)
Syntomopus cyzicus (Walker): Walker, 1846:28.
Schmiedeknecht,1909:376.
Dicyclus circulusThomson, 1876:253. Lectotype,
Trang 15Thinodytes cyzicus (Walker): Graham, 1956:261.
Hedqv-ist, 1975:180. Boucek, 1977:56. Kamijo, 1978:
Hedqvist, 1983:167. Boucek and Rasplus,
1991:32.
Discussion.— The synonymy of Dicyclus
circiilus with Thinodytescyzicus isaccepted
on the authority of Graham (1969).
Thi-nodytes cyzicus resembles T. cyzicopsis and
T. petiolatus,becauseall three specieshave
three small, sharp, asymmetrically
long, reticulate petiole. Besides the
geo-graphic separation of their ranges, T.
Nearctic species by its body color.
Thino-dytes cyzicus is uniformly dark and lacks
the distinctive diffuse metallic patches on
the head and mesosoma present in T
cy-zicopsis and T. petiolatus. Thinodytescyzicus
alsohas threerows ofsetae distally in the
costal cell,whereas T cyzicopsis and T.
pe-tiolatus have only two rows The eye
lengthin T. cyzicus is4X or lessthe length
and T.
petiolatus havethe eye lengthmore
than 4X the length of the temple (Figs 3,
7).
Distribution.—Thinodytes cyzicus occurs
1970; Kamijo 1978)
Biology.— The hosts of T. cyzicus are all
Agromyzidae Askew(1970) recorded this
species from an agromyzid, probably
Phy-tomyza atricornis Meigen, on Senecio
jaco-baea Linnaeus Kamijo (1978) recorded T.
cyzicus from Chromatomyia horticola
(Gou-reau)(Diptera: Agromyzidae) on pea and
from an agromyzid on Lathyrusmaritimus.
Takada and Kamijo (1979) recordedT.
T. cyzicus may parasitize the larval stage
of its host
Thinodytespetiolatus Heydon,
new species
Figs 6, 7, 11, 19
Holotype, female.—Color: Bodyblackbut
ver-tex, gena, lateral region of pronotum,
lat-eral lobe of mesoscutum, middle lobe of
mesoscutumwithpairoflarge diffusetallic patches, anteriorlateralcorner ofax-
me-illa dark metallicgreen; gasterwithish reflections. Antenna with scape dark
green-green; remainder brown, pedicel with
black with greenish reflections; femora
Sculpture: Clypeus weakly alveolate;face alveolate, cells elongate in radiatingfashion from clypeus; remainder of head
deli-cately and regularly alveolate except
propo-deum alveolate; petiole finely alveolate.
width 1.4X height (28:21), 2.6X length(28.5:11.0); clypeus with threesmall asym-metricallyarranged clypeal denticles (Fig 11); weak genal concavity extending Vs
length4.8X temple length (9.5:2.0)(Fig 7)
vertex rounding regularly into occiputantennal torulusjust above LOcL. Anten-
0.91X head width (26:28.5); ratio oflengths of scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6,clubas 11.5:3.5:1.0:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:6.0;
apically, with small patchofmicropilosity
notauli shallow posteriorly; propodeum
(Fig. 19) withbasalfovea margined
Trang 16sculptured band, carinate anteriorly; spi- arate these two species are given in the
marginofpropodeum.Forewingwithrel- hind margin of T2 in many specimens ofative lengths of submarginal, marginal, T petiolatus is distinctly concave, but thepostmarginal, stigmal veins as 27.0:14.5: visibilityofthis characterdepends on how15.0:9.0; stigma small;basal veinwith row the specimen has dried. This character is
fe-length 2.0X width (8:4); without median males
carina;withtwopairsoflateral setae.Gas- Type Material:— The
(33:24); hind margin of Tl strongly sinu- June 1931, on Salsola pestiferby D. E. Fox
ous laterally, emarginate mesally; ovipos- and the allotype (USNM) was collected at itor sheaths hardlyexserted; hypopygium TwinFalls, Idaho,on 5August 1920by R
Elk-blue-green; dark bands on tibiae very water, 9.VI.1956, 1 male; Elkwater Lake,
6) with length of pedicel plus flagellum (swept from barley), 1 female, 5.VIII.1956
1.1X head width (28:25); ratio of lengths (swept from barley), 1 male; nr.
Leth-of scape, pedicel, annelli,Fl-6, club as9.0: bridge, 1924.1925, 1 female BRITISH
CO-3.5:1.0:2.5:3.0:3.0:3.0:3.0:3.0:8.0; widths of LUMBIA: Bowser, 28.V.1955, 1 female;
fine, reclinate. Petiole length 2.0X width 18.VI.1973, 1 male United States. (8:4). Gaster length 1.2X width (20:16); ZONA:Mesa,3.VI.1958 (swept fromalfal-
ARI-truncate apically. fa), 1 male CALIFORNIA: Albany,Variation.— The body color varies from 29.IV 1958, 1 male;
sosoma reduced and obscure, the frenum male; Boca, 22.VII.1970, 1 female; Bolinas,
metallicgreen The bodylength of females Phytomyza aqiiilegiana), 10 females; Cerro
examined variedbetween 1.3 and 1.8 mm Noroeste (sw. corner of Kern Co.),
Dar-sometimes extends only Va the length of win Falls (nr. Panamint Springs),
the propodeum The row of setae on the 29 III.1984(onEncelia), 1 male; Emeryville,basal vein sometimes curls proximally, 28.V.1958, 1 male; Eureka Dunes (Inyo
fe-Disciission.—
Thinodytespetiolatus and T. male; Lake Tahoe, 29.VI 1927, 1 female;
cyzicopsis are very similar species and are Lily Pond (alpine lake), VI 1971, 1 female;
Trang 177.V.1961, 2 males; PlacerCo., Vlll, 1 male; (5), 1 male; Moscow, 6.VIII.1926, 1 male;Sagehen Creek (near Hobart Mills), 24. Murtaugh, 29.V.1930 (3 & 5), 1 male; Oak-
VI.1970, 1 female, 21-25.VI.1982 (sweep- ley, 7.VIII.1929(1,3 &5), 1 female; Rupert,ing Primus), 1 male, 12.VII.1972, 1 male, 29.V.1930, 1 female; Tuttle, 22.V.1931 (4),
11-15.VII.1982, 1 female, 23.VII.1968, 1 fe- 1 female; Twin Falls, 7.VI.1930, 1 male;male, 1.VIII.1970, 1 female; San Bernardi- Wendell, 22.V.1931 (5), 3 males MON-
OR-19.VII.1982, 1 male; Santa Cruz, EGON: Corvallis, 15.VI.1981, 1 male,22.V11I.1948 (ex PJnjtonn/zasp B), 1 female; 26.VI.1985, 1 female, 3 males; Near Cor-
Santa Rosa, 25.V.1990, 2 males; Sheppard vallis(St. Mary'sPeak), 15.VIII.1984
6-Sphenosciadiumcapitellatum),! male; Shive- 12.VI.1984 (Malaise trap), 1 female, 11
Soquel, 26.VIII.1960 (ex Agromijza sp.), 2 20.VIII.1984, 5 females, 2 males; 1 mile w
females; Titus Canyon (Death Valley Na- McKinzie Pass, 1 female, 1 male UTAH:
mexicana), 1 male; Tomales Bay State Park MonteCristo,6.VII.1976, 1 male; Myton, 3
WASHING-(1500'), 29.III.1955, 1 male; 6 miles w Bas- TON: San Juan Island (Barney's Place),
setts (Yuba Pass), 9.VII.1970, 2 females, 2 23.VII.1944, 1 male Vancouver, 15.VI
males COLORADO: Chambers Lake(Lar- 1911, 1 female, 1 male, 16.VI.1911, 1 male,
Collins, 20 VIII.1895 (on boxelder foliage), 13.VII.1985 [Artemesia spinosa
{?=spines-1 female, 1 male; Glacier Basin, Rocky cens D.C Eaton], 1 male; Snowy Range,
Mountain National Park, 24.VII.1977, 1 23.VIII.1951, 2 females, 1 male,
male; Echo Lake (Mt. Evans, 10,500'), Etymologxj.— The
species name refers to
4.VIII.1961, 1 female IDAHO: Boise, the long petiole, characteristic of this 28.V.1984 (Malaise
spe-trap), 2 males; Buhl, cies.
petiolatus is
14.VI.1930 (3), 1 female, 9 VII.1931, 1 fe- unknown but it has been taken in
associ-male; Eden, 11 VIII.1930 (2), 1 female; ation witha number ofplants, suchas
1 male; Hollister, 16.V.1931 (3), 1 male, Salsola pestifer, and Sisymbrium altissimum20.V.1931, 2 males, 2.VI.1931, 1 female, 1 in Idaho and Encelia in California It has
male, 5.VI.1931 (3), 1 female, 7.VI.1931 (3 also been collected in association with
&5), 1 female, 13.VI.1931,1 female;Hubbs crop plants, such as beets in Idaho and
Butte,22.V.1931, 1 male, 6.VI.1931, 1 male; barley in Alberta
Holotype, female.—Color: Body black
'
Thehostplantsfor thespecimens fromIdahoare
j^^^^g ^f mesoscutum, SCUtellum, gaster;
numbered as follows: 1= A.? rosae. 2= Beta viiharis n <- i i i
L. 3= Soplua sophia {=Descuraima sophia (L.)V.B. coppery reflectionson frenum and Webb).4= SalsolapestiferA Nelson.5= N.(ortn ) al- lum; yellow-green reflechons on middle
dorsel-tissiiniim or = lobe ofSCUtellumand propodeum.
Trang 18Anten-Journal of
dorsally, brownish white ventrally. Legs
Sculpture: Clypeus alveolate; frenum,
with T5-7coriaceous, remainder smooth
width 1.4X height(28:20), 2.3X length(28:
genal concavity extending Va malar
dis-tance; eye height 1.3X length(11:10), 2.2X
length (10:2); ratio of MOD, OOL, POL,
LOL as 2:3:6:3; vertex rounding regularly
into occiput; antennal torulus
just above LOcL Antennawithlength of pedicelplus
flagellum 0.86X head width (24:28); ratio
of lengths ofscape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6,
club as 10:3:1:2:2:2:2:2:2:6; widths of Fl,
F6,clubas2:2:2;clubsimpleapically,with
small patch of micropilosity ventrally on
dorsal-ly,length 1.5X width(32:22);notauli
shal-lowposteriorly;propodeumwithbasal
fo-vea obscure, nucha lunate strip and
cari-nate anteriorly, spiracles on anterior
relative lengths ofsubmarginal, marginal,
postmarginal, stigmal veins as 24:12:12:6;
width (36:23); hind margin of Tl nearly
straight, slightly convex mesally;
Discussion.—This species is distinct
from all other Thinodytes species by the
characterslistedin the key:scapeand legs
beyond coxae pale, nonmetallic; frenum
and medianpanelsofpropodeumsmooth;
posteriorly Inthesecharacters,T. santerna
is phenetically similar to species of
Noto-glyptiis.
Type Material—The holotype (USNM)
Monument, Inyo County, California(USA) by E E. Grissell on Distichlis in a
brackish marsh
Etymology.— The
specific epithet of this
species is from the Latin noun santerna,
meaning borax, and refers to the localitywhere the type specimen was collected.Biology.— Nothingis knowofthehost(s)
of T. santerna
Gra-ham, 1981 (examined); original
designa-tion.
Description.— Body very dark green or
blue; scapebrownish yellow, nonmetallic.Head, pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum
(including frenum), dorsellum, medianpanels of propodeum, petiole alveolate;gastral tergitesnearly smooth Head with
(Fig 13), lateral part of mouth marginwith shortshallowgenal concavity; anten-
nal torulus IX owndiameterabove LOcL Antenna with scape cylindrical, >6X as
head width in females, about equal tohead width in males; funicular segmentscylindrical; MPPsensilla in single row; fe-
Male maxilla with palps slender, stipites
dorsally; pronotum withcollar short(Figs
23-25), nearly level with vertex dorsally,
notauli shallow, impressed lines at most;
median groove, frenum indistinguishable
ridge across anterior margin of
propo-deum; propodeum (Fig. 20) with medianpanels short (width about 2X median
length), plicaeand median carina well
W-shaped carina; spiracles strongly ovate
ofveins asfollows: >
Trang 19Figs 23-25. 23, Maidensmaderensis Graham,femalepronotumand mesonotum;24, Maidens iligneus n sp.,femalepronotumand mesonotum;25, Maidens venetiis n.
sp., femalepronotum and mesonotum
stig-mal vein; costalcell with complete row of
setaeand sometimesa partialsecond row;
basal cell bare; basal vein setose;
specu-lumpresent,openposteriorly Petiole(Fig.
20) longer than wide, with basal flange
thickened
laterally, without median
lanceolate,length1.6ormoretimes width;
sinuous laterally, emarginate medially
(Figs8, 21).
Discussion.—This genus is placed in the
Halticoptera-group as definedinthispaper
by: the rounded pronotum, shallow
propo-deum with a median carina and plicae
reticu-late petiole with a complete basal flange,
emar-ginate medially Maidens and Halticopitera
exhibit considerable phenetic
similarity
bi-dentate(Fig 13);thelefthandclypeal
den-ticle is divided by a sulcus formed as a
den-ticles are shown in their plesiomorphic
separated state in Thinodytes (Fig 11).The
den-ticle is found in Halticoptera Spinola
the unrelated genus Sphegigaster Spinola,the left tooth in the bidentate clypeus is a
struc-ture and the nonmetallic scape are
rela-tionshipbetweenHalticopteraandMauleus
Halticoptera is well-defined cladisticallyrelative to Mauleus by the very low inser-
LOcL) and by themalemaxilla,which hasthe terminal two segments of the palps
expand-ed Two apomorphic characters readilydefineMauleus relative to Halticoptera and
relatedgenera: 1.The propodeumis
exam-ined) 2. The basal flanges of the petioleare exceptionally large and thick, givingthepetiole a connateappearance.Thebas-
al flanges in related genera are generallyfree-standing lamella and the petiole is
more or less cylindrical.
reared from pupae ofthe native hollyleaf
miner, Phytouiyza ilicicola Loew (Diptera:
Trang 2018 Journal of
- Pronotalcollarwithsideswidestnearanteriormargin and converging
posteriorlyindorsal
2. Vertexandmesoscutumwith conspicuouspalesetae. Propodeumwithreticulationsmuchlesscoarse thanonscutellum,medianpanel eachwithbroadshallowgroovealonganterior
- Vertexandmesoscutumwithindistinctdarksetae.Propodeumwithreticulations ascoarse
ason scutellum, median panel each with a pair ofelongate sublateral depressions along
3. Propodeum withanteriordepressionbetweenbasal foveae;median panelswithextensivearea ofweak, almost smooth sculpture. Pronotumwith humeral angles acute, coming to
blunt pointsin dorsalview (Fig 25). MPPsensilla in twoor more rows onfunicular
-Propodeum without distinct anteriordepression betweenbasal foveae;medianpanels
al-mostentirely alveolate,withatmostasmallcentral patchofweaksculpturing. Pronotum
withhumeralangles eithersquared orslightly andsmoothly convergentposteriorly (Fig.
24). MPP sensilla in singlerow onfunicularsegments(male ofM cultratus unknown) 4
4. Eyeheight2.5-2.7X genaldistance. Female with combined lengthofheadand mesosoma
longer thangaster; gaster lessthan twice aslongaswide; hypopygiumextendingaround
% gastral length (UnitedStates) iligneusHeydon-
Eyeheight2 1-2.4X genaldistance. Female with combinedlengthofhead and mesosomaless than or equal to length of gaster (Fig 8); gaster more than twice as long as wide;
hypopygium extending to near tip ofgaster (southern Mexicoto Argentina)
cultratusHeydon
ovi-Fig. 8 positor sheaths) 1.6mm Head width1.2X
height (26:21), 2.2X length (26:12); genal
Holotype female.-Color: Head, pleural
concavityextendingVs malar distance;eye
j^^-g^t 1.4X length (13.5:9.5), 2.2X malar
bluishblack; collar, dorsum ofmesosoma
distance (13.5:6.0), length 4.8X temple
greenish black; gaster dark brown, Tl
with dark blue reflections. Antenna with
2:4:6:3; torulus IX own diameter abovescapebrownishyellow withweakmetallic lqcL Antennawithlength of pedicelplus
reflections;pedicel, flagellumbrown. Legs
flagellum 0.81X head width (21:26); ratiowithcoxae, trochanters,femora darkblue; of
lengths of scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6,
tibiae brown except basal and apical tips dub as 9.0:3.5:1.0:1.5:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:2.0:5.0;
brownishyellow;foretarsibrown, middle widthsof Fl, F6, clubas2:3:3;MPPsparse,
andhindtarsiyellow-brownwithpretarsi only one or two visible per segment from
Sculpture: Clypeus, median portion of (33:23); pronotum with sides
converging
propo-mesonotum, scutellum, frenum, median deum with width of median panels 2.2Xpanels of propodeum alveolate; petiole length (11:5); basal fovea a shallow, tri-
finely alveolate; gastersmooth exceptT5- angular depression;
plicae fading out in
7 coriaceous anterior 0.5X own diameter
Trang 21from anterior margin of propodeum.
submargin-al, marginal, postmarginal, stigmal veins
as 27:16:14:7; costal cell with single
com-plete row of setae; basal vein setose with
one seta posteriorly on cubital vein
Peti-ole length 1.5X width (9:6); sides
narrow-ing posteriorly Gaster lanceolate (Fig. 8),
length2.6X width(42:16),length l.OX that
of head and gaster (42:42); hypopygium
reaching to apex of T7; ovipositor sheaths
exserted for distance equal to half length
ofhind tibia.
Variation.— The color of the head,
pleu-ral regions, and petiole varies from dark
blue, as in the holotype,to dark greenand
nearlyconcolorous withthedorsumofthe
mesosoma The body length ofspecimens
whereas the length of the specimen from
Ixtapan is 2.3 mm, the one from Morelia
areexserted for a distance equal to ¥ito Vi
the lengthof the hind tibia.
Discussion.—Maidens cultratus can be
distinguishedfrom M. iligneusby the
char-acters given in the discussion section for
that species
Eti/mologx/.— The species name comes
from the Latin word cultratus, meaning
knife-shaped, and refers to the shape to
(CNCI) andone paratype femalewere
para-type females were collected as follows
(CASC, CDAE, CNCI, SEMC, USNM):
4-8.XI.1983 (Malaise trap). Mexico
CHIA-PAS: San Cristobal de las Casas,
1-12.V.1969; MICHOACAN: Morelia,
TA-MAULIPAS: 6 miles n. Ciudad Victoria
Panama. Chiriqui, XII.1946
Biology.— The host(s) of this species are
Sculpture Clypeus and immediate
vi-cinity finely alveolate (Fig 13); remainder
of head, mesoscutum, scutellum, frenum,
median panels of propodeum alveolate;petiole finely alveolate; gaster smooth ex-
ceptT6 and T7coriaceous
width1.3X height(29:23), 2.2X length(29:
13); eye height 1.4X length (15.0:10.5),
OOL, POL, LOL as 2.5:4.0:7.0:3.0; toruluslocatedIX owndiameterabove LOcL An-
flagel-lum 0.88X head width (25.5:29.0); ratio of
lengths of scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6,clubas11.0:3.0:1.0:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:7.0;
Me-sosoma length 1.5X width (36.0:24.5);
sides convergent posteriorly (Fig 24);
no-tauli extending to hind margin of
(Fig. 20) with plicaefading outin anterior
half,basal foveaextending halfway down median panels and bordered mesally by
marginofpropodeum. Forewingwith
postmarginal, stigmal veins as 25:15:11:6;
and one partial row distally; basal vein
with row of three setae. Petiole (Fig. 20)
length 1.3X width (8:6); narrowing riorly; basal flanges large. Gaster fusiform
poste-(Fig 21), length 0.87X length ofhead and
gaster; ovipc^sitor sheath exserted for a
distance equal to/ length ofhind tibia.
Allotype.—Male Color similar to
Trang 22paler ventrally; tibiae brownish yellow, allotype (USNM), and an additional nine
Bodylength 1.8 mm Head with ocelli rel- female and seventeen male paratypes
Phijto-LOL as 3.0:3.0:7.5:3.5 Antenna with mi/za ilicicolaon IlexopacaSolanderatlengths of pedicel plus flagellum l.Ox ington, Kentucky byD A Pottercollected
Lex-head width (31:31); relative lengths of 16 May 1984 An additional 43 paratypesscape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6, club as 10.0: were collected as follows (CNCI, UCDC):
3.5:1.0:3.0:3.5:3.0:3.0:3.0:3.0:8.0; widths of ILLINOIS: Cave-in-Rock State Park, near
Fl, F6, club as 2.5:3.0:3.0; setae reclinate. Cave-in-Rock, 4.VI.1981, 1 female
KAN-Gaster ovate, length 1.8X width (42: SAS:Oswego, 17.V.1976, 1 female
in air-dried specimenwill be shorter) miner) 1 male, VII-VIII.1937(exPhytomyza
Variation.—Length of female specimens ilicis), 4 females, 8 males; Laurel,
between 1.1 and 1.8 mm. Other than the Brunswick, 26.V.1947 (ex Phytomyza
ilici-ratherlargevariationin size, thisisamor- cola), 1 female TEXAS: Houston,
8.XII.-phologicallyuniform species. 1929 (ex leafminer on IlexvomitoriaDiscussion.— Mauleus
9.V.-from M. cultratus in the following: 1. The 1912, 1 female VIRGINIA: Norfolk,
12); range 2.5-2.7] females, 4 males
than inM. cultratus [x=2.24±0.038
(n=
Un-M. cultratus 3. The ratio of the length of derhill 1943 (as Sphegigastrinae, new
the gaster is
relatively greater in M. ilig- 1936 (as Sphegigaster sp.)]. It may also be
(n=10); range 1.2- the species called Halticoptera sp. by Kulp
8) 4. Theratio of the gastral length divid- 1968 are questionable because the Phy
to-ed by its width is less for M. iligneus myza complex onhollywasnotstudied in
2.2-3.1)] 5. The hypopygium extends to Mauleus iligneus was a primary parasite
/^news(Fig 21),but isnearlyevenwiththe leafminer, Phytomyza ilicicola, was
unpar-tip of T7 in M. cultratus (Fig. 8). 6. The asitized, but was a facultative
hyperpar-ovipositor sheaths are exserted for a asite on Opius striativentris Gahan
(Hy-length equal to Va the length of the hind menoptera: Braconidae)whenthatspecies
tibia in M. iligneus (Fig 21), but for about had already parasitized the agromyzidV3 to Vi the length of the hind tibia in M. maggot. Potter and Gordon reared no
Mau-theLatin word ilex, meaningholly leus iligneus parasitizes the fly late in its
Trang 23Mauleus maderensis Graham
Fig. 23
No 5.3454 (examined) Boucek and
Rasplus, 1991:41.
Diagnosis.—Mauleus maderensis differs
from the threenewly described species in
dorsal view as for most other
Pteromali-dae— more or less parallel, but weakly
convex, with the broadest point being
posterior edge (Fig 23). The three new
speciesofMauleus described in this paper
have the pronotum in dorsal view
broad-est near its anterior margin and distinctly
issimilar inpropodeal structuretothe
Ca-ribbean speciesM. niritus. However, these
twospeciesareeasilydistinguishedby the
characters given in the key
Distribution.— Madeira (Pico das
Arru-das, near Sao Martinho), and possibly
Mexico (Boucek and Rasplus, 1991)
ofMexican origin (Boucek, pers. comm.).
Biology.— The insect host(s) of M.
mad-erensis remainunknown.
new combination
No 5.876 (examined) Heydon, 1989:193
Diagnosis.— ThetypeofMauleus nigritus
gone and the gaster and petiole mounted
on thecard separatelyfrom theremainder
how-ever, to confirm that this species belongs
in Mauleus Mauleus nigritus differs from
the three newly described species in that
ithas the sidesof the pronotum in dorsal
view moreorless parallel,withthe
broad-est pointbeing about halfwaybetween its
anteriorandposterioredge.Thethreenew
have the pronotum in dorsal viewest near its anterior margin and distinctly
similar in pronotal structure to M.
mader-ensis; however, these two species are
eas-ily distinguished by the characters given
in the key.
Distribution.—Mauleus nigitus is known
Biology.— The insect hosts ofM. nigritus
Fig. 25
Holotype, female.—Color: Body black
ex-cept anterior aspect of head, collar, soscutumsteelblueand lateralportionsofmetanotum, propodeum, Tl blue Anten-
me-na with scape, ventral side ofpedicel and
Fl brownishyellow, remainderof pediceland flagellum brown. Legs with coxae
blue reflections, except basal and apicaltipsbrownish yellow; tibiaebrownish yel-
Sculpture.—
Clypeus and immediate
vi-cinity finely alveolate; remainder ofhead,mesoscutum, scutellum, frenum, medianpanels of propodeum alveolate; petiolefinely alveolate; gaster smooth except T6 and T7 coriaceous
width 1.4X height (42:30), 2.5X length(42.0:16.5); eye height 1.5X length (20:13),
POL, LOL as 3.0:6.5:9.0:4.0. Antenna with
length of pedicel plus flagellum 0.90X
scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6, club as 15.0:
4.0:1.0:4.5:4.5:4.5:4.0:4.0:3.5:8.0; relative
sensilla in two rows on each
Trang 2422 Journal of
ventral patch of micropilosity Mesosoma
length 1.5X width (26.5:18.0); pronotum
with humeral angles acute (Fig. 25);
parallel; propodeumwith regionbetween
basal foveae depressed (this depression
shortermesally than laterally and
bound-edposteriorlyby weakcarina), plicae
fad-ing out before reachfad-inganteriormarginof
propodeum, nuchal region raised,
al-most on anterior margin of propodeum.
sub-marginal, sub-marginal, postsub-marginal, stigmal
veins as 37:23:15:8; costal cell with 1
com-pleteand 1 distal partialrowofsetae;
bas-al cell bare; basal vein with row of setae;
speculum open posteriorly Petiole length
1.1X width(9:8).Gaster length 1.4X width
(43:31), 0.66X combined length of head
gastral length;ovipositorsheaths hardly extending beyond hind
marginof T7
Allotype, male.—Similar to female
ex-cept:bodylength1.8 mm Head withratio
ofMOD, OOL, POL, LOLas3.5:4.0:7.0:3.0.
Antenna with length of pedicel plus
lengths of scape, pedicel, annelli, Fl-6,
club as11.0:3.0:1.0:4.5:4.5:4.0:4.0:4.0:4.0:9.0;
relative widths of Fl, F6, club as 3.0:3.5:
distrib-uted over funicular segments in many
rows; setaereclinate,nearlyabsent.Gaster
length 1.1X width (29:26).
Diagnosis.—Mauleus venetus is
Mau-leus species by the acute humeral angles
of the pronotum, the broad depression
propo-deum, andthe lack ofsculptureover most
of the median panels of the propodeum.
iligneus—thecoloration ofthe two species
isbrighterblue inM. venetus Inaddition,
fu-nicular segment in both sexes, whereasthey are arranged in only one row in M.iligneus.
Etymology.— The species name comes from the Latin word venetus, meaning
blueor sea-blue, and refers to the
Type Material.— The holotype (IRCW) is
a female, collected in Grant Co (T6N,
26.V.1985 Six paratypeswerecollected as
follows (CNCI, IRCW, UCDC, USNM):
1 female United States. ILLINOIS:
Uni-versity of Illinois South Farms, near
Champaign, 26.V.1985, 1 male
MICHI-GAN: Midland Co., 2.VII.1943, 1 male
male WISCONSIN: Grant, T6N, R6W,
S17, 3-8.VI.1976 (gypsy moth Malaise
trap), 1 female, 14-21 VI.1976(gypsymoth
Biology.— The host(s) of M. venetus are
unknown.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Melissa Bennett and two anonymous
re-viewsfor their careful reading of this manuscript I
also thank thefollowing peopleforthe loan of
ma-terialusedin this study: Dr J S.Noyes, TheNatural
HistoryMuseum,London, ENGLAND(BMNH);Dr.
W.J Pulawski, CaliforniaAcademy of Sciences,San
Francisco,CA(CASC);Dr F G.Andrews,California State Collection of Arthropods, Sacramento, CA(CDAE);Dr G A P Gibson,CanadianNational Col-
lection, Ottawa,ON(CNCI);Dr. W E LaBerge,
Illi-nois Natural History Survey,Champaign,IL (INHS);
S Krauth, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI(IRCW); Dr R. W Brooks, Snow Entomological
(SEMC);Dr E E Grissell, United States Nationalseum, Washington, D.C. (USNM) The acronym for
Mu-the collection of Mu-the BohartMuseumat theUniversity
Trang 2523LITERATURE CITED
Allen, M W and R H Painter 1937 Observations
on thebiology of the wheatmaggot in Kansas.
Journal of Agricultural Research 55:215-238.
Allen, W A. and R L Pienkowski 1973 Parasites
rearedfrompuparia of the fritfly, Oscinellafrit,
in Virginia Environmental Entomology 2:615-617.
Anderson,H 1990. Threenewspecies of
Halticopter-ina Erdos(Hymenoptera:Pteromalidae)
Pan-Pa-cific Entomologist 66:131-139.
Askew, R R 1970 Observations on the hostsand
host food plants of some Pteromalidae [Hym.,
Chalcidoidea] Entomophaga 15:379-385.
Boucek, Z 1970 Contribution to the knowledgeof
Italian Chalcidoidea,based mainly ona study at
the Institute ofEntomology in Turin, with
de-scriptions of some new European species.
Me-morie della Societa Entomologica Italiana 49:35-102.
Boucek, Z 1976 African Pteromalidae
(Hymenop-tera): new taxa, synonymies and combinations.
Journal of the Entomological Societi/ of Southern
Af-rica 39:9-31.
Boucek, Z 1977. A faunistic review of the
Yugosla-vian Chalcidoidea(parasiticHymenoptera).Acta
Entomologica Jugoslavica 13(Suppl.): 3-145.
Boucek, Z 1993. Newtaxa ofNorth American
Pter-omalidae and Tetracampidae (Hymenoptera),
with notes. Journal ofNatural History
27:1239-1313.
Boucek, Z. and J.-Y. Rasplus. 1991 Illustrated Key
toWest-Palea rcticGeneraof Pteromalidae
(Hy-menoptera: Chalcidoidea) Institut National de la
RechercheAgronomique. Paris.
Burks, B D 1979. FamilyPteromalidae pp.768-835.
In, K V.Krombein,P D.Hurd,D R Smith,and
B D. Burks (eds.). Catalog of Hi/menoptera in
America North of Mexico. SmithsonianInstitution
Press.Washington,D C.
De Santis, L 1979. Catdlogo delos Himenopteros
Cal-cidoideos de America al sur de los Estados Unidos.
Comision de Investigaciones Cienti'ficas de la
Provinciade BuenosAires. La Plata.
Dzanokmen,K A 1978 Identification of the insects
of the European part of the USSR Vol 3.
Hy-menoptera. Second Part Pteromalidae.
Opredeli-teti FauneSSSR 120:57-228.
Gahan,A B 1933. Theserphoidandchalcidoid
par-asites of the Hessianfly. U.S Department of
Ag-riculture, Miscellaneous Publications 174:1-147.
Girault, A A 1918. Newand old WestIndian and
North Americanchalcid-flies(Hym.)
Entomolog-icalNews29:125-130.
Graham, M W R. de V 1956. A revision of the
Walkertypesof Pteromalidae(Hym.,
Chalcidoi-dea) Part 2 (including descriptions ofnew
gen-eraandspecies).Entomologist'sMonthlyMagazine
92:246-263.
northwesternEurope (Hymenoptera, dea) Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural His-
Chalcidoi-tory) Entomology Supplement 16:1-908.
Graham, M.V R.deV 1981. AsurveyofMadeiran
Chalcidoidea (Insecta:Hymenoptera)with
addi-tionsand descriptions ofnewtaxa Bocagiana 58:
1-20.
Hedqvist, K.-J 1975. NotesonChalcidoidea 7.Akey
toSwedishspecies of thegenusHalticoptera Spin.and three related genera (Hymenoptera: Pter- omalidae) Entomologica Scandinavica 6:167-181 Hedqvist, K.-J 1983. Malmsteklar pa Olands Stora alvar Entomolgisk Tidskrift 104:165-168.
Hendrickson, Jr., R.M 1979 Field studiesand
par-asites of Liriomyza trifoliearum (Diptera: myzidae) in northern USA Journal of the Neiv YorkEntomological Society 87:299-303.
Agro-Heydon,S, L 1988. A review of the world species
of NotoglypHus Masi (Hymenoptera: dae) Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 9l:U2-\23.
Pteromali-Heydon, S L 1989. Relationships among Holarctic genera in theCyrtogaster-group witha review of the species ofNorth America north of Mexico.
(Hymenoptera:Pteromalidae) Journal of theNew
YorkEntomological Society 97:192-217.
Heydon,S L 1993 Syntomopus Walker:Thenearctic species with a review ofknownhost associations
(Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) Journal of
Hyme-noptera Research 2:107-116.
Heydon,S L.and W E.LaBerge 1988. Areview of
North American species of Sphegigasternorth of
Mexico and the biology of their hosts
(Hyme-noptera: Pteromalidae) Journal of the Kansas tomological Society 61: 258-277.
En-Howard,L.O 1897. Onthe Chalcididae of the island
ofGrenada, B.W.I Journal of the Linnean Society
of London Zoology 26:129-178.
Kamijo, K 1978 Chalcidoid parasites
(Hymenop-tera) ofAgromyzidaein Japan, with description
of anewspecies Kontyu 46:455—469.
Kulp, L A 1968. The taxonomicstatus ofdipterousholly leaf miners (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Uni-
versity ofMarylandAgricultural Experiment Station
Bulletin A-155:l-42.
Langford, G S.and E N Cory 1936. Theholly
leaf-minerand its control Proceedings of the National Shade Tree Conference 13:109-112.
Morrill,W.L.andR.W Kieckhefer 1971 Parasitism
of thewheatstemmaggot inSouthDakota.nal of Economic Entomology 64:1129-1131 Nikol'skaya, M N 1937. The chalcidoid parasites
Jour-(Hymenoptera) of some injurious flies of grain crops Entomological Review 27:1-27.
Peck, O 1951 Superfamily Chalcidoidea pp
410-594 In, C F.W Muesbeck,K V. Krombein, and
Trang 26Journal of
Mexico, Synoptic catalog U.S.Departmentof
Ag-riculture, AgricultureMonograph2:1-1420.
Peck, O 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic
Chalci-doidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) Canadian
Ento-mologist Supplement30:1-1092.
Peck, O., Z Boucek,andA Hoffer 1964. Keysto the
Chalcidoidea of Czechoslovakia. Memoirs ofthe
Entomological Society of Canada 34:1-120.
Potter, D A. and F C. Gordon 1985 Parasites
as-sociated with the native holly leafminer,
Phyto-myza ilicicola Loew (Diptera: Agromyzidae), on
Americanhollyin Kentucky Journal of the Kansas
Entomological Society58:727-730.
Schmiedeknecht, O 1909. Hymenoptera family
Chalcididae Genera Insectorum 97:1-550.
Spencer,K. A. 1976. The Agromyzidae(Diptera) of
Fennoscandia and Denmark.Fauna Entomologica
Scandinavica 5:1-606.
Spencer,K. A. and G C Steyskal 1986. Manual of
theAgromyzidae(Diptera) of the United States.
U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Agriculture
Hand-book 638:1^78.
Takada, H.andK.Kamijo. 1979 Parasitecomplexof
the garden pea leaf-miner, Phytomyza horticola
Goureau
Thomson, C G 1876 Hymenoptera Scandinaviae 4.
Pteromalus(Svederus).Lund
Thomson,W R 1958. Catalogue ofparasitesand
pred-ators ofInsectpests Section 2.Hostparasite logue. Part 5 Hosts of the Hymenoptera (Mis- cogasteridae to Trigonalidae), Lepidoptera andStrepsiptera p 562-698. Commonwealth Insti-
cata-tute of Biological Control Ottawa, Ontario Underhill, G. W 1943. Some insect pests of orna-
mental plants. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 349:27-38.
Walker, F 1833. Monographia Chalciditum mologist'sMagazine1:367-384,455^66
Ento-Walker, F 1839a Monographia Chalciditum, 1.
Walker, F 1846 List of the specimens of Hymenopterous
insects in the collection ofthe BritishMuseum Part I-Chalcidites.London
Trang 27J RES Vol 4, 1995, pp 25-32
(Hymenoptera: Vespidae): Nesting and Evaluation of
Abstract.— An account is given ofsome aspects of the nesting of Rolandia angulata (Richards)(Masarinae) This wasp nests in multicellularburrows in
compacted sandy soil. The sloping trance tothe burrow, notsurmountedby a turret, isconcealed beneatha
en-pebble, a plantletor a suitableitemof debris.The mainthrust of the shaft is verticallydownwards,however,at intervals
it curves outwards to end in a horizontal cell so that each cell, except the last excavated and
thereforedeepest one, appears tobe accessed bya lateral shaft. Thecells areunlined The tecture of the nest and the method of its construction are discussed The association between
archi-Rolandia angulata andGoodenia (Goodeniaceae)flowers, the source ofnectar and
pollen, is
evalu-ated It isshown that the associationwith Goodeniapinnatifida Schldl., at least, is mutually
bene-ficial. Indeed it is suggested that in some areas, at some times, R angulata may be the mostimportantpotential pollinator of thisplant.
The genus Rolandia Richards, 1962 is (28.03S, 148.30E), and 85 km E of St
listed by van der Vecht and Carpenter George (28.03S, 148.30E) (27-29.X.1993,
Meade-Waldo, 1911 As the analysis on Thereisonlyone publishedobservationwhich this isbased has not yet beenpub- on the nesting of Rolandia—that of R. ma-
in the present paper Rolandia is restricted oblique, blindly ending burrow in sandy
Hous-R maculata (Meade-Waldo) and R. hous- ^^^ is currently investigating further the
third, R borreriae Snelling, from Northern ^^^^i^^ available for comparison
angii-(Richards), the subject of this paper, from ^"^" published m the present paper were Queensland and New South Wales undertaken by the authors during the
r, ^ J- 1 I u u J J course of a fieldtrip to Australia in Rolandia angulata has been recorded , ^^^^ w ,
from southwestern Queensland and , , , »„
n u noo/ic 1/ir /.niri /o- u j gulata, the forage plants, and thebee Cunnamulla [28.04S, 145.40E (Richards ; « i.u r i x x ^u a i-
visi-.^^„ T^ ,
, , ^ , . tors to the forage plants), the Australian
, ,
'^ t> / National Insect Collection, Canberra [R.
m thenorthto90 km WofCobar, Barnato
,,,^,,,,^,,1 and the Australian NationalTanks [31.38S, 144.59E] (about 400 km
the south, and from three sites to the east NESTING
of Cunnamulla, 80 km E of Cunnamulla Description of the Nesting Areas.— Two
Trang 28catedbetweenStGeorge and Cunnamulla
of St George on 28 October and the other
80 km east ofCunnamulla on 29 October,
in dry open scrub dominated by Acacia
(Fig 2). Both areas had recently received
rain intheformoflocalized
thundershow-erswhich had resulted in agrowth of
an-nuals which were in flower on the road
vergesand in thelow lyingareas Thesoil
inboth areas was but
fri-able It was increasingly moist at least to
Flozvers Visited.— The
rec-ord offlowervisitingbyR angulataisthat
Goodenia cycloptera R.Br, inC.Sturt
(Good-eniaceae) atBarnatoTanks In the present
of aprostrateherb also identified as G
cy-cloptera (Fig. 11) and an erect herb
Good-enia pinnatifida Schldl. (Fig. 6) in the twoareas where nests were discovered and
Trang 29also in the area 85 km east of St George
Atthemosteasterlysite,thatis85km east
Cunnamulla it was observed that G
whereasG puinntifidabecameincreasingly
common andatthesite80kmeastof
fol-lowed a similar pattern to that of G
pin-natifida.
Visits to the flowers by female R
angii-lata were abundant by lOhOO and
afternoon Visits became fewer in the late
afternoon and ceased after IThOO Males
only laterin thedayto visit them for
nec-tar.
All plants flowering together with the
twoGoodeniaspecies,mostnotablyseveral
Asteraceae and a Wahlenbergia species
flow-er visitors. None was being visited by R.
angulata
Provision.—Provision in the form of a
firm, white pollen loafwas obtainedfrom
each ofthree cells. Pollen from the loaves
was examined microscopically and found
to match that obtained from the Goodenia
flowers
the flowers but rested on a neighbouring
plant, forexample on a grass stem, or on
copu-lationsatflowerswereobservedanda
nest-exca-vatingfemalewasnoted Several instances
ground next to plants and of "hot
pur-suit" were noted
Description oftheNest.— Thenest (n =
8)
consists ofa subterranean burrow (Fig 5)
clearing(Fig 3).Theentranceisconcealed
item of debris (Fig. 4). It is a
3-4 mm in diameter, not surmounted by
a superstructure For approximately the
first10 mm the shaft slopes gently
verti-cally downwards, however, at intervals itcurvesoutwardstoendinahorizontalcell
so that each cell, except the lastexcavated
and therefore deepest one, appears to be
accessed by a lateral shaft. These "lateral
shafts" radiate out through 360° each
continues constant The first cell in the
be-tween 180 and 370 mm, the "lateral
shafts" were 30 mm in length, and the
cells 13 mm long and 4 mm in diameter
packed with sand afterthe cell which
cells are unlined
Provisioning.— Water is not required forthe excavation of the nest as the sandysoil, though compact, is friable. The sand
extracted from the burrow is carried out
oftheshaftheldbetweenthehead andthe
ammochaetae. Whilst excavation is in
progress, the female, when leaving the
nest,backsout Duringtheinitialstagesofburrow excavation the extracted sand isdropped in flight in a more or less con-
stant area to one side of theentrance and
dropped further from the nest in a
con-stant arc about250 mm from theentrance
develops
in a sealed, fully provisioned cell
indicat-ed that mass provisioning is practised
Trang 30with-28 Journal of
shaft leading to thenext cell.
Thefullyfedlarva spinsa whitecocoon
which completely fills the cell. Like the
sealed cell it is therefore rounded at the
inner end and truncate at the outer end
Discussion of Nesting.— Thenest ofR
an-gulata is essentially similar to that of R.
(pers. comm.) as a vertical burrow in
sandy soil, about 300 mm deep and
un-lined, with unlinedcells atthe lowerend
Thusthebasicnesttypeforthesetwo
spe-cies of Rolnndia can be defined as a
mul-ticellularsub-verticalburrowinhorizontal
ground excavated by the nester, without
an entrance turret and with excavated
When comparedwith the sevenbasic nest
types recognized for the Masarinae as a
whole by Gess and Gess (1992) this
ap-pears to fitNest type1 except for the lack
ofan entranceturret. Whenthe methodof
construction is compared with that of the
specieslistedforthisnesttype, abasic
dif-ference is apparent Water is used in the
excavation and construction of Nests of
type1, likenestsoftypes 2and 3,whereas
the nests of the two Rolandia species are
is possibledue to the friablenature of the
soil in which they are sited. As noted in
GessandGess(1992)nestinginfriable soil
than primitive as in the Pompilidae and
Sphecidae.Thenest typeofthetwo
Rolan-dia species is therefore seen as a sub-type
which canbe derived from Nest type 1.
Both species of Rolandia carry sand,
ex-tracted from the shaft, out of the burrow
held between the head and the
am-Fig 5 Plan of vertical section of a nest of Rola7tdia
attgulata Cells 2—5 followed cell I, radiating out in
sequence through 360° and at successively greater
50mm
Trang 31Figs 6-10 6, Goodeniapinnatifida, an erect herb; 7, a flower of Goodeniapiiiiiatifida,indusium concealedby
the bases of the adaxialpetals;8, Rolandia angulata entering a flower of Goodeniapinnatifida, indusiumof the flower exposed (X 2.8); 9, Rolandia angulata in nectar drinking position in a flower of Goodenia pinnatifida,
indusium of the flower fittingsnugly overthe wasp'smesosoma (X 2.8); 10, Rolandia angulatawithdrawingfroma flower of Goodeniapinnatifida,showingdustingofpollen onthe head,dorsumof theprothorax, and
anterior part of themesoscutum(X 2.8).
ammochae-tae fringing the genae is a generic
char-acter (Snelling 1986) and it is therefore
excavate their nests in a similar manner
The only other vespid genus recorded as
the spoils of excavation is Pterochihis
in vertical burrows in friable soil by two
specieshasbeendescribed
(Isely 1914and Evans 1956).
EVALUATION OF ASSOCIATION
WITH FLOWERS VISITED
Both R angulata males and females
ob-tain nectar and for their
nec-tarand pollen for provisioning their
nest-cells apparentlysolelyfromGoodenia
flow-ers. They are therefore probably ant on Goodenia flowers To determine
depend-whether or not the association between
thewasp and theflowers is mutually
ben-eficial or not, that is whether or not thewasp in addition pollinates the flowers,
requires a consideration of the functionalmorphology ofthe flowers, thebehaviour
of the wasps in the flowers, and wasp/flowerfit.
ad-axial petalsare differentiatedin their
Trang 32Journal of
Figs 11-13 11, Goodeniacycloptera, a prostrate herb; 12, three flowers of Goodenia cycloptera, indusium cealedbythe bases of the adaxialpetals;13,Rolandia angulata in nectar drinking position in aflowerofGoodenia
con-cycloptera,indusiumof the flower presseddownonthewasp'sfoldedwings(X 3.3).
indusium in the flower (Figs 7and 12) so
thatit is
seeks the nectar at the base of the flower
(Figs 8 and 13). The indusium is a cup at
the top of the style and the surrounding
stigmatic initial that collects and retains
pollenfromthe stamens,whichdehisce in
thebud, and presents it thus tothepollen
1992) Later the stigmatic initials mature
and grow outofthe indusium andcollect
R. angulatawhen visitingtheflowersfor
nectaralways alights on thelowerlip and
indu-sium so that, if the flower is in the pollenpresenting phase, thewaspreceives pollen
onitshead When it isin thenectar ing position in a flower of G. pinnatifida,
the indusium but, when it is in a flower
of G
cycloptera, which is deeper, it is the
folded wings which are pressed beneaththeindusium (Fig 13).On emerging from
a flower of G canbe
Trang 33seen tohave beenwell dusted withpollen
thus laden with pollen to a flower with
receptive stigmas the wasp would be
ide-ally suited to pollinate it It is not clear,
effec-tively pollinate the deeper flowers of G
cycloptera. It ispossiblethat pollenmay be
transferred from its head to a receptive
transferred
distribution, R. angulata is a potential
pol-linator, at least,of the widespread species
G pinnatifidawithwhichit thereforehas a
atnoneofthesiteswasR.angulatathe sole
visitor to the Goodenia flowers
fascicu-laris F.Muell & Tate at Kondar to the
southeast, was a
relatively abundant itor to G
vis-pinnatifida. Furthermore the
flowers of both species of Goodenia,
par-ticularly those of G cycloptera, were
com-mon species was Leioproctus
{Chri/socolle-tes) moretonianus (Cockerell) (Colletidae)
which was also recorded from
Michener (1965). Less common visitors
were a second, but slightly smaller,
spe-cies of Leioproctus {Chrysocolletes) and a
species of Megachile (Megachilidae)
fur-ther species of Megachile, an additional
coUetid, a halictid, a few anthophorids
the bees were uncommon at the site 27
km west of St George and at the site 80
species of Leioproctus (Chrysocolletes) were
absent At the latter site a third much
smaller species of Leioproctuswas also
re-corded However, R. was the
only abundant visitor suggesting that in
pinnatifida.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thefollowingarethankedwithappreciation:Terry
Houstonof theWesternAustralianMuseumfor mission to quote hisunpublished observations con- cerning thenesting of Rolandia maciilata; Jo Cardale
per-of the Australian NationalInsect Collection,Canberra
forfacilitatingthe identification offorageplants; sten Cowley, Australian National Herbarium, Can-
Kir-berra for the identifications of theforageplants;Alan
Weavingof theAlbanyMuseumforproducingblack
and white negatives from the authors' colour parencies for Figs1-4 and 6-13;and theSouth Afri- canFoundationfor ResearchDevelopmentfor a roll-
trans-ing support grant to F.W.Gess,whichmadepossiblethe fieldwork in Australia. The manuscriptwas re-
viewed byKarl V. Krombein and ananonymous
re-viewer,whoarethankedfor their constructive
com-ments.
LITERATURE CITED
Bohart, R.M 1940. Arevision of theNorth American
species of Pterocheilusandnoteson relatedera (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) Annals of the En- tomological Society of America33(1): 162-208 Carolin, R.C.,M.T.M.Rajput,andD Morrison 1992 Goodeniaceae In:
gen-George, A.S ed., Flora of
Aus-tralia,volume35: Brunoniaceae, Goodeniaceae.
Can-berra: Australian Government Publishing
Ser-vice, pp 4-300.
Evans, H.E 1956. Notes onthebiologyof four cies of ground-nestingVespidae(Hymenoptera) Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washing- ton58(5):265-270.
spe-Gess, F.W. and S.K Gess 1992 Ethology of threesouthern Africangroundnesting Masarinae,two
Celonites species and a silk-spinning Quartinia species, with a discussion ofnestingbythe sub- family as a whole (Hymenoptera: Vespidae).
Journal of Hymenoptera Research 1(1): 145-155.
Houston,T.F 1984. Bionomicsof a pollen-collecting
wasp, Paragia tricolor (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Masarinae), in Western Australia Records of the
Western AustralianMuseum11(2): 141-151.
Isely, D 1914. The biologyof someKansasidae Kansas University Scietice Bulletin (2)8(7):
Eumen-233-309.
Meade-Waldo G 1911. Notesonthefamily
Masar-idae (Hymenoptera), with descriptions of a newgenus and three newspecies. Annals andMaga-zine of NaturalHistory(8)8: 747-750.
Michener,CD 1965. A classification of the bees of AustralianandSouth
Trang 34Journal of
oftheAmericanMuseumofNaturalHistory 130:
1-362.
Richards,O.W 1962. Arevisional study of the Masarid
wasps {Hymenoptera, Vespoidea). London: British
Museum(natural History).
Richards,O.W 1968. Newrecordsand newspecies
of Australian Masaridae (Hymenoptera:
Vespo-idea) Journal of the Australian Entomological
Soci-ety 7: 101-104.'
Snelling,R.R. 1986. Thetaxonomyand nomenclature
ofsome Australian paragiinewasps
(Hymenop-tera: Masaridae) Contributions in Science 378:
Trang 35Vol 4, 1995, pp 33-10
Two Strikingly Distinct Sympatric Colour Forms of
Rolandia angiilata (Richards) (Hymenoptera:
Abstract.—The maleof Riekianocatunga Richards fromsouthern Queensland,the maleand two
strikingly distinctsympatric colourformsofRiekia confluens (Snelling),comb,nov., fromWestern
Australia,andthe maleof Rolandia angnlata (Richards) from southernQueensland are described.
The charactersdistinguishingR. nocatungaand R. confluens are discussed
TheAustralian Masarinaeand their
nat-ural history are relatively poorly known.
Duringa recentcollectingtrip toAustralia
by the author, S.K.Gess and R.W.Gess,
material collected included males ofthree
species, Riekia nocatunga Richards, Riekia
confluens (Snelling),comb, nov.,and
Rolan-dia angnlata (Richards), hitherto described
distinct sympatric colour forms of Riekia
thesewas previously unknown and helps
to elucidate the identity of a single male
to place it in a species
Riekia Richards, 1962 and Rolandia
Meade-Waldo, 1911 by van der Vecht and
Car-penter (1990) on thebasis ofanas yet
pub-lished and maybestudied, thepresent
au-thor considersitbest tocontinuetoaccept
Riekia and Rolandia as genera in theirown
right.
Institutions in which the material
stud-ied is are: Albany Museum,
Grahamstown, South Africa (AMG); tralian National Insect Collection, Canber-
Perth (WAM).
Riekia nocatunga Richards
Riekia nocatunga Richards, 1962: 55-57, female.
This specieswasdescribedfrom 7 miles
NofNocatunga [on mapsas Nockatunga]
paratype)
his original description with regard to the
de-tails. Two of these females, in the tionofthe Natural History Museum, Lon-don, have been examined by the present
collec-author Theyareconfirmedasbeing R. catunga They are less melanistic than the
areas are less extensive and some, in
Trang 36Journal of
ticularthoseonthepronotum and tergites each side of mesoscutum where its
fur-1 and 2, are brownish rather than black, rows meet pronotum (usually but not The light areas are more extensive and ways present in females) absent in boththeircolour is a strongyellow ratherthan males examined,
Snelling (1986) figured and briefly dis- slightly longer than interantennal
dor Homestead (25.08S, 116.54E) in West- as long as scape (with radicle), one and aernAustralia Whereas it agreedgenerally third times as long as wide at its distal
with the originaldescriptionofR. nocatun- end, and one and one fifth as long as the
ga, Snelling stated that there was no cer- second flagellomere. Last three
be-species and that he suspected that it was neath; ultimate flagellomere narrowing
not He listed some discrepancies, allow- apically and distinctly curved to form a
tobe availablebefore the specific status of Genitalia(Figs3and4);parameralspine
Recentlycollected Riekia material, ofrel- length and not hook-like apically; ventral
onomicquestion, consistsofassociated fe- and short, subtriangular, without a
and Western Australia The specimens Length 7.5-7.8 mm; length of forewing
from Queensland are certainly R. nocatun- 5.8 mm, hamuli 14.
ga, as established by the comparison by New Material Examined.—Queensland:
from WesternAustralia on theotherhand Goodenia fascicularis F.Muell & Tate,represent two strikingly distinct colour Goodeniaceae); SouthwoodRoad, western
cially similar looking to Riekia nocatunga (27.56S, 149.30E), 26.x.1993 (F.W.,S.K.&
this form show the characters noted by of St George (28.03S, 148.30E), 27.X.1993Snelling for hismale. (F.W.,S.K.& R.W.Gess) 8 females, 1 maleMale.—
verysimilarto thatoffemalebutdiffering Schldl., Goodeniaceae) Two females and
inthat the following parts are palelemon- 1 male in ANIC; 2 females inWAM; rest
yellow: small streakonscapesdistally,en- of material in AMG.
spotbetween and above antennal sockets,
^ Riekia sp. Snelling, 1986: 6, 8 and Figs 10,
19-sinus(not risingabove upperlimitof
fron-21 maletal spot and separated from it by about
width of antennal socket), uninterrupted Snelling (1986)
erroneously described
Trang 37Figs. 1-4. Riekia nocatunga 1, dorsofrontal view of vertex and dorsal view of anterior third of thorax of female (X17.6); 2, dorsal view of posterior third of thorax of female (X17.6); 3-4, ventral and ventrolateral
views of genitalia ofmale(X57).
Figs 5-8. Riekiaconfluens 5, dorsofrontalviewof vertexanddorsalviewof anterior third of thorax of female (X17.6); 6, dorsalviewof posterior third of thorax of female(X17.6); 7-8, ventraland ventrolateralviewsof genitaliaofmale(X63);[all lemon-yellowcolour form]
generic key, the species with its
Riekia Richards, 1962 Further, with the
se-tae attheapexof the mid- andhindtibiae
(a specificcharacter) the charactersgiven
by him in his ofthe species are
all common to both coiiflnciii^ and
nocn-tungn and may therefore be considered
to be generic characters pertaining to
Riekia. Similarly the confluence of the
(leading to the name confluens), or
Trang 38ca-36 Journal of
rina, is a character shared with
confluens (and nocatiinga) generically
apart from Paragia.
Material collected at a single site near
distanc-esof 165km and260kmin awesterlyand
west-south-westerlydirection respectively
from the typelocalitiesofconfluens (16km
WSW Lyons River Homestead, 24.38S,
115.20E—paratypefemale, and36km ESE
Minnie Creek Homestead, 24.00S,
115.42E—holotype female) consists of 53
females and 4 males The material is
di-visible into two very distinct groups, one
black and reddish-brown and the other
black and lemon-yellow. Whereas
intra-groupvariability isnegligible, inter-group
differences with respect to colour
gener-ally and to colour pattern on the
metaso-ma in particular are striking.
in-termediate forms initially led to thebelief
that two species were represented.
be found that supported this view and it
inoverall facies is a product ofthe
differ-ences in colour and colour pattern. The
reddish-brown colour form, consistent
with the description of Snelling's two
para-type), is represented in the present
mate-rialby femalesonly,thelemon-yellow
col-our form bybothsexes Tofacilitate
intra-specific comparison, descriptions limited
to colour pattern are givenofboth female
inter-specificcomparisonwithnocatiingathe
de-scription of the male is
detail.
description it isincorrectly stated that the
probasitarsus is
inad-vertent error as it is in fact slightly less
than halfas wide as long
Reddish-brown (RB) Colour FormFemale.—Black The following reddish-brown: mandiblesotherthanforteethand
fused spots) between and above antennalsockets and narrowly separated ventrally
from clypeal marking, variously sizedelongate spot in upperhalfofeach ocularsinus (rising to level of anterior ocellus
and lateral spotssometimesbroadlyfusedabove], a large oval spotbehind eyes dor-
sally, entire upper surface of prothorax
other than for narrow streak bordering
posterior margin, tegulae except for cleartestaceous central spot and narrow mar-gin, scutellar disc other than for its ante-
me-dially, a large spot on angles of deum, large spot on mesopleuron below
propo-tegula, distal end of mid- and hindcoxae,
part of foretrochanter and whole of andhindtrochanters, femur, tibia and tar-
than for anterior declivity, tergite 2 other
than for a variously developed anterior
black band which may be triangularly
produced in the middle and for a pair of
on posterior margin, an anteriorly ing triangular spoton posterior marginoftergite 3, tergite 4other than for a narrow
transverse posterior band on gastral
ster-nites 2-5 (those of sternites 2 and 3 and sometimes 4 strongly and widely anteri-orly produced in the middle)
Lemon-yellow (LY) Colour Form
Female.—
(Figs 5 and 6). Black The
Trang 39neath, trochanters of mid- and hindlegs, eral and anterior margins, single large
hind-heavily black suffused) and inner and coxae, entire outer aspect of midfemora,
pect and distal end oftibiae, all tarsomer- distalends),narrowlongitudinalstreakon
es, posterolateral portions of dark mark- all basitarsi, transverse posterior band onings on sternites2-4 and sternite 6 apical- gastral sternites 2-5 (all with median lobe
ly (allblack-suffused) Thefollowing lem- strongly and widely anteriorly produced,on-yellow: proximal half to two-thirds of together giving the effect of a wide me-
dis-arcuateblack lines ondistal half, a pair of tance; firstflagellomere slightlymorethanirregularly shaped frontal spots between half (0.53) as long as scape (with radicle),and above antennae, a narrow streak on one and three quarter times as long as
of pronotum, tegulae except for clear tes- Tergite 7 truncate and narrowly
trans-taceous centralspotand narrowmargin, a verse
apically
large transverse suboval shield-like spot Genitalia (Figs 7and 8); similartothose
on scutellum (not quite reaching anterior of R nocatungabut differing in detail
par-margin), a small spoton raised partof
ax-ticularly with respect to the form of the
illae,a largespotonanglesofpropodeum, inwardly directed lobe of the volsella
a small spot on mesosternum anterior to Length 7.8-8.3 mm; length of forewing
coxalcavities, a small lateral spoton mid- 5.5-5.7 mm; hamuli 12-13
and hindcoxae, distal half of outer aspect Material Examined.— Western Australia:
of forefemora, distal spot on outer aspect 8 km NE of Carnarvon (24.51S, 113.45E)
all tibiae (except distal ends), wide ante- (F.W.,S.K.& R.W.Gess) 16 RB females, 29
tergites 1-5, tergite6 (other than for vari- flowers ofLechenaiiltia sp.,Goodeniaceae),
ously developed posteriorly pointing V- 4 RB females, 1 LYfemale (atwater), 2 RB
shapedblackmarkleaving lateraland me- females, 1 LY female (without biological
dian spots or almost eliminating these), data). Two RB females, 2 LY females andtransverse posterior band on gastral ster- 1 LY male in both ANIC and WAM; rest
lobed with median lobe strongly and Discussion.—R confliieiis may be
Male.—
indi-very similar to that offemalebutdiffering cated morphological characters,
in that the followingparts are palelemon- InR. confluens theratioofPOL(distance
yellow: entire anterior aspect of scapes, between posterior ocelli):OOL (distance
Trang 40Journal of
catunga it is 1:1.0-1.1. relative proportionsofthe firsttwo
flagel-In R confliiens the pilosity of the pro- lomeres, in the form of gastral tergite 7
dividual hairs being slender and only Present data would indicate that the
slightly curved apically whereas in R no- distributionsof the species arewidelycatunga the pilosity is much denser and arated, R nocatungci occurring in New
sep-the individual hairs are more robust and South Wales and Queensland and R
con-markedly and evenly curved. fluens in Western Australia
In R confluens thescutellum (Fig 6)has
its disc posteriorly widely and evenly to Rolandia angulata (Richards)bluntly rounded and abruptly declivitous
^.^^^.^^,^^^^^^^^j^.^j^^^^^^ ^^^^. ^q^_^q2, female,
over-^^,^„^^,.^ ^^^^^^^^^ (Richards), Snelling, 1986: 8.
hangs; theposterolateral freeedgeofeach
lateral wing is almost straight. The meta- This species was described from
ible from above In R. nocatunga the scu- Tanks [31.38S, 144.59E] (about 400 km
tellum (Fig 2) has itsdisc posteriorly nar- south of Cunnamulla), New South Wales
thereforeof even depth; it is sloping, vis- Insects, Canberra, and found to be
identi-ible from above cal.
it is two and a quarter times wider than lighter in hue and brighter and contrast
whereas in R. nocatunga it is 2-4, most marking, and the distinct median and
recogni-theapexofthemetatibia is1-2,most com- tion of the male even in the field,
The species differ in the female sex in than interantennal distance; first
flagello-the form of the pronotum as seen from mere three times as long as broad at itsabove In R. confluens (Fig 5) the anterior distal end, about two-thirds as long as
and lateral margins describe a semicircle scape (withradicle) [three-quarters aslong
whereas in R. nocatunga (Fig 1) the as scape withoutradicle],anda littlemore
so that the anteriorand lateralmarginsdo flagellomeres 3-9 subequal in length andnot describe a semicircle but the anterior with the exception of 3 wider than long;
margin appears subtransverse. 3-7 increasing in width; 7 and 8 of same