1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng

Income taxation by valencia chapter 13 (income taxes on partnerships, estates trusts)

11 242 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 11
Dung lượng 236,5 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Add: Compensation income 240,000Note: Interest income and dividend income have been subjected to final tax, hence, not to be included anymore in an annual taxable income.. B The co-owner

Trang 1

CHAPTER 13

INCOME TAXES OF PARTNERSHIPS, ESTATES &

TRUSTS

Problem 13 – 1 TRUE OR FALSE

1 False – not all partnership, only commercial partnership

2 False – tax exempt, but required to file

3 False – the tax withheld in creditable

4 True – starting on the 4th year of operation

5 True

6 True

7 True – because it is withheld with final tax

8 True

9 False – trading business income will make the partnership a commercial partnership

10 False – still subject to final tax of 10%

11 True – if created through gratuitous transfer, not more than 10 years and no

contribution is made by the co-owners

12 True

13 True

Problem 13 – 2 TRUE OR FALSE

1 True

2 False – It shall be in writing either as trust inter-vivos or through a will

3 False – A trustor is the person who establishes the trust, not the trustee

4 True

5 True

6 True

7 True

8 False – P50,000

9 True

10 True

11 False – the personal exemption is P50,000

12 True

Problem 13 – 3 Problem 13 – 4

11 C

Problem 13 – 5 A

Net profit from trading business of the partnership

Less: Income tax (P400,000 x 30%)

Income after tax

P400,000

120,000 P280,000

Trang 2

Interest income, net of final withholding tax

Dividend income

Total income for distribution to partners

Divide by profit and loss ratio

Share of each partner

Multiply by dividend tax rate

Income tax on the distributive share of Mitzi Baguingan

4,000 10,000 P294,000 2 P147,000 10%

P 14,700

Problem 13 – 6

(1

(2

Problem 13 – 7

1 A

J, Opting itemized deduction:

Share of J in the Partnership (325,000-175,000) x 70%

Other business income

Total business income

Less: Itemized deductions (excluding contribution)

Net income before contribution

Less: Contribution

Actual, P1,750 + (15,000 x 70%) =P12,250

Limit, P155,000 x 10% or P15,500

Allowed

Net taxable before personal exemption

Less: Personal exemption (P50,000 + 25,000)

Net taxable income of J

P105,000 85,000 P190,000 35,000 P155,000

12,250 P142,750 75,000

P 67,750

2 D

R, opting for standard optional deduction:

Share in the partnership, gross (P325,000 x 30%)

Other business income

Total business income

Less: Optional standard deduction (P162,500 x 40%)

Net income before personal exemption

Less: Personal exemption - single

Net taxable income

P 97,500 65,000 P162,500 65,000

P 97,500 50,000

P 47,500

Problem 13 – 8

Trang 3

Add: Compensation income 240,000

Note: Interest income and dividend income have been subjected to final tax, hence, not to be included anymore in an annual taxable income

Problem 13 – 9

1 D

None The objective of co-ownership is to preserve the co-ownership property, therefore, not subject to tax

2 B

The co-owners in an exempt co-ownership are liable for the tax in the income they received from the co-ownership They should file the return and pay the corresponding tax based on their separate and individual capacity

The net taxable income of Robert is computed as follows:

Share from the income of co-ownership

Less: Personal exemption – single

Net taxable income

P1,000,000 50,000

P 950,000 Income received by the co-owners is already net of itemized deductions of the co-ownership, therefore, the co-owners in their individual capacity is not anymore entitled to optional standard deduction Inasmuch as the related expenses have been deducted before the distribution of income to the co-owners, (Sec 34 L)

Supreme Court Ruling - Deductions and exemptions are highly disfavored in law They must

be construed strictly against the taxpayer, (Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs P J Kiener Company, LTD., 65 SCRA 143)

Problem 13 – 10 D

Problem 13 – 11

1 B

Income of the grantor

Income of trust A - revocable

Total income of the grantor

Less: Total expenses

Grantor – business expense

Trust A – business expense

Grantor’s income before personal exemptions

P400,000

200,000

P1,000,000

500,000 P1,500,000

600,000

P 900,000

2 D

Income of trust B – irrevocable trust

Less: Expenses of irrevocable trust – B

Net income before exemption

Less: Personal exemption

Net taxable income of all the trust

P200,000

100,000 P100,000 50,000

P 50,000

Trang 4

3 Not in the choices

Income of beneficiary (P100,000 – P40,000)

Add: Share from trust

Net taxable income before personal exemption

P 60,000 50,000 P110,000

Note: Unless the taxpayer signifies in his ITR his intention to elect the OSD, he shall be

considered as having availed himself of the itemized deductions (Sec 34(L), NIRC)

Alternative solution of 3: If beneficiary opted to use OSD

4 Not in the choices

Income of beneficiary

Add: Share from trust

Total gross income

P100,000 50,000 P150,000

Problem 13 – 12

1 The partnership is a general professional partnership, therefore, tax exempt

2 and 3 Computation of tax liabilities of partners A and B

Net income of the partnership (P1,200,000 – P100,0000) P1,100,000

Partner A = 60% Partner B = 40% Total Partner’s salary

Distribution of balance

Total

Less Personal exemption

Net taxable income

P240,000

300,000 P540,000 50,000 P490,000

P360,000

200,000 P560,000

100,000 P460,000

P 600,000 500,000 P1,100,000

Tax on excess (P210,000 x 30%) 63,000

Problem 13 – 13

Gross income – merchandising

Dividend received from nonresident foreign corporation

Ordinary and necessary expenses – merchandising

Net income before income tax

Less: Provision for income tax (P380,000 x 30%)

Net income

P575,000 60,000 (255,000) P380,000

114,000 P266,000 Note: Dividends received from domestic corporation by a general co-partnership is tax exempt

Computation of partnership share considered as dividends:

M - 40% W – 60%

Trang 5

Dividends from domestic corporation (P40,000)

Interest income, net of final tax of 20%, (P8,000)

Distributive partner’s share on general co-partneship

Multiply by final tax rate

Final tax on share on partnership income

16,000 3,200

P 125,600 10%

P 12,560

24,000 4,800

P 188,400 10%

P 18,840 Note: In a general co-partnership, the share of individual partner is considered as dividend income

Problem 13 – 14

1 BIR Ruling (August 18, 1959) provides that the co-ownership shall be taxed as a

corporation if the property was not divided for more than ten (10) years Therefore, the tax on the income of the co-ownership would be:

Income of co-ownership

Multiply by corporate normal tax rate

Income tax as corporation

P5,000,000 30% P1,500,000

2 Final tax on dividend of Marjorie Sison:

Amount received from co-ownership

Multiply by final tax rate on dividend

Final tax on dividend – income tax withheld

P1,000,000 10%

P 100,000

3 The amount received by Grace Ann Subala shall no longer be subjected to normal tabular tax because it has been subjected to final tax on dividend

Problem 13 – 15

1 Answer

Conjugal gross income from estate

Less: Business expense (P5,000,000 x 40%)

Income distributed to beneficiaries

Conjugal net income

P2,000,000

600,000

P5,000,000

2,600,000 P2,400,000 200x income tax due from the estate of Mr Baguingan:

Share of Mr Baguingan from the net income of the conjugal estate

(P2,400,000 x 50%)

Less: Personal exemptions (P50,000 + P25,000)

Taxable income

Tax on P500,000

Tax on excess (P625,000) x 32%)

Income tax due

P1,200,000 75,000 P1,125,000

P 125,000

200,000

P 325,000

Mr Baguingan’s income from estate shall claim the total amount of P75,000 personal exemptions (RA 9504) because Sec 35C of the NIRC provides that if the taxpayer dies during the taxable year, his estate may claim the corresponding additional exemptions for himself and his dependent(s) as if he died at the close of such year Hence, the applicability of the exemption of the income from estate amounting to P50,000 shall take effect only in the succeeding years after the decedent’s death

2 Answer

Trang 6

Net taxable income P300,000

Note: Unless the taxpayer signifies in his ITR his intention to elect the OSD, he shall be

considered as having availed himself of the itemized deductions (Sec 34(L), NIRC)

Alternative solution: If beneficiary opted to use OSD

Compensation income

Add: Income received from trust, net of OSD (P200,000 x 60%)

Total income before exemption

Less: Personal exemptions:

Basic

Additional (P25,000 x 4)

Taxable income of Mrs Diana Nievera

Tax on P140,000

Tax on excess (P80,000 x 30%)

Income tax due

P 50,000

100,000

P250,000

120,000 P370,000

150,000 P220,000

P 22,500 24,000

P 46,500

3 Answer

Total amount received by the children

Multiply by withholding tax rate

Total withholding taxes

P600,000 15%

P 90,000

Problem 13 – 16

Correction: Second paragraph should be…”A year following the death of Naty Poc….”

Tax savings:

Income tax when no income of estate was distributed (Case 1 + Case 3)

Less: Income tax when P150,000 of estate’s income was distributed

Supporting computations:

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Business deductions:

Income tax on excess

Case 4: (220,000 – 140,000) x 25% 20,000

Problem 13 – 17

1 Income tax payable by the trust in 200x:

Trang 7

Income from house and lot

Income from hollow block business (P10,000 x 12)

Income from farm

Total gross income from trust

Less: Related expenses (P250,000 x 30%)

Amount distributed to the beneficiary

Net income before exemption

Less: Exemption

Net taxable income

Tax on P70,000

Tax on excess (P5,000 x 20%)

Total income tax payable

P 75,000 50,000

P 80,000 120,000 50,000

P 250,000

125,000

P 125,000 50,000

P 75,000

P 8,500 1,000

P 9,500

2 Income tax payable from the beneficiary in 200x:

Gross income received from income of trust

Less: Personal exemption

Net taxable income

Total income tax payable

P 50,000 50,000

P 0

P 0

Note: Unless the taxpayer signifies in his ITR his intention to elect the OSD, he shall be

considered as having availed himself of the itemized deductions (Sec 34(L), NIRC)

Alternative solution – if Trust and beneficiary opted to use OSD

Amount distributed to the beneficiary 50,000 150,000

Problem 13 – 18A

Correction: The requirement should be stated as: How much is the income tax due and

payable of the two trusts?

Total income of trusts (P50,000 + P1,000,000)

Less: Distribution to beneficiary (P10,000 + P20,000)

Exemption

Net taxable income

P 30,000 50,000

P1,050,000 80,000

P 970,000

Trang 8

Tax on P500,000

Tax on excess (P470,000 x 32%)

Income tax due and payable

P125,000

150,400 P275,400

Problem 13 – 18B

Note: Since the topic is tax planning and the requirement is tax savings, OSD can

automatically assumed to be used to determine the lower tax

2 Income tax when no income of estate was distributed (Case 1 + Case

3)

Less: Income tax when P150,000 of estate’s income was distributed

Supporting computations:

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Income tax on excess

Problem 13 – 19

1 To minimize income tax, Dokling can do the following:

a Put his business under irrevocable trust

b Use OSD instead of itemized deduction because the OSD is greater than

the itemized deduction, and

c Claim his child’s allowance as share from the income of the trust

2 Tax exposure before the creation of trust:

Trang 9

Note: The allowance is not deductible because the child is not

established as beneficiary of the trust Furthermore, the business is not in

trust

50% of the business is created as trust:

Grantor:

Income tax if 50% is held in trust (irrevocable)

Trust:

Income tax if 50% is held in trust (irrevocable)

Beneficiary:

Problem 13 – 20

Note: Since the topic is tax planning, the taxpayer should use OSD instead of itemized

deduction because using OSD can give a greater tax savings based on the given data of this case

Trang 10

Tax on P70,000 P 8,500

Less: Income tax in No 1

Problem 13 – 21

1

Not a government project

Less: Cost of construction, net of VAT (P72,800,000/1.12) 65,000,000

b The share of joint venture partners X Co and Y Co is not

subject to income tax under inter-corporate dividend

rule

2

Government project (consortium)

a Tax-exempt

X Co Y Co

b Share of co-venturers in the net income (P20M x

Multiplied by corporate income tax rate 30% 30%

Note: OSD is not applicable to co-ventures because their respective shares are already net of

expense

Problem 13 – 22

1

Not a government project

Less: Cost of construction, net of VAT (P56,000,000/1.12) 50,000,000

b The share of joint venture partners X Co and Y Co is not

Trang 11

subject to income tax under inter-corporate dividend

rule

2

Government project (consortium)

a Tax-exempt

X Co Y Co

b Share of co-venturers in the net income (P20M x

Multiplied by corporate income tax rate 30% 30%

Alternative solution using OSD:

Note: If the joint venture opted to use OSD, it will have a lower income tax obligation,

computed as follows:

1 Not a government project

Less: Cost of construction, net of VAT (P56,000,000/1.12) 50,000,000

b

The share of joint venture partners X Co and Y Co is not

subject to income tax under inter-corporate dividend

rule

2 Government project (consortium)

a Tax-exempt

X Co Y Co b

Share of co-venturers in the net income (P20M x 50%) P9,000,000 P9,000,000 Multiplied by corporate income tax rate 30% 30%

Ngày đăng: 28/02/2018, 08:40

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm

w