Local police investigators are curious whether Townsend has truly learned from “the error of his ways.” The local sheriff has received a number of complaints from area citizens, who are
Trang 1Chapter 5
Criminal Law and Business
Trang 2Chapter 5 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma
Warren Delaney believed that his home was his “castle,” and during the summer months every year,
his “castle” was a tiny cabin nestled in the woods of upstate New York Delaney was an Economics
professor at a small college in Florida, and for him, there was no better way to “rest and recharge”
after a hectic academic year than to head north for the cozy confines of his cabin.
For several consecutive years, Warren’s cabin had been vandalized and/or burglarized during the
winter months while he was in Florida During the winter of 2006, several windows had been
shattered In the winter of 2007, several pieces of furniture had been stolen At some point during
the winter of 2008, the bedroom mattress had been ripped apart for some unexplained reason, with
foam and fabric scattered about the bedroom floor On each of these occasions, the perpetrator had forced the front door lock open, and had entered the cabin through the front door.
Warren envisioned a way to stop the criminal(s) responsible for these violations He spring-loaded a
shotgun in the living room of the cabin, and pointed it directly at the front door The shotgun was
configured so that if someone opened the front door while he was away, it would fire at the intruder.
Warren returned to his cabin in May 2010 and came upon a grisly scene The front door had been
opened, and at the threshold was the partially-decomposed body of what appeared to be a
middle-aged man, dead of a shotgun blast to the chest Warren immediately called the local sheriff, Officer
Brian Mulholland Upon arriving at the scene and briefly questioning Warren, Officer Mulholland
arrested him.
Was the arrest valid? Did Warren Delaney commit first-degree murder? Did Warren use justifiable
force in this situation?
Trang 3Chapter 5 Case Hypothetical
Thomas Townsend has an embarrassing criminal past In 1985, he was convicted of pedophilia, having had
sexual relations with a 15-year-old child (at the time, Townsend was 29 years old.) By all accounts, Townsend has led a relatively uneventful life over the years since 1985, spending most of his time building and selling
musical instruments to earn a living, and reclusively “keeping to himself” on his property on the edge of town
Local police investigators are curious whether Townsend has truly learned from “the error of his ways.” The
local sheriff has received a number of complaints from area citizens, who are appalled that a child sex offender
is “among their midst.” Working in collaboration with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI,) local police
authorities devise and implement a plan to determine whether Thomas is leading an innocent life Over the
course of an eighteen-month period, police investigators mail Townsend a circular they have created,
advertising a fictitious publication called “Lustful Lads and Lasses.” Among other pronouncements, the
circular entices readers to “order now before publication ceases; see young boys and girls aged 12-16
engaged in all sorts of acts only big boys and girls should be allowed to do!”
Having received the circular each month and having declined on seventeen occasions, Townsend finally
responds to the circular on the eighteenth occasion, mailing in the $39.95 purchase price Local, state and
federal authorities immediately intervene, arresting Townsend for solicitation of child pornographic materials
At Townsend’s arraignment hearing, his attorney moves for immediate dismissal of the charges, arguing
entrapment Do the police efforts described constitute entrapment? Does entrapment justify dismissal of all
charges against the accused? Rather than dismissal of charges, why not simply sanction those authorities
responsible for the entrapment?
Trang 4Elements of a Crime
• “Actus Reus”—Wrongful behavior
(guilty act)
• “Mens Rea”—Wrongful state of
mind, such as purpose, knowledge,
recklessness, or negligence (guilty
mind)
Trang 5Classification of Crimes
• Felonies—Serious crimes punishable by
imprisonment for greater than one year, or
death
• Misdemeanors—Less serious crimes
punishable by fines, or imprisonment for
less than one year
• Petty Offenses—Minor misdemeanors
punishable by small fines or short jail
sentences
Trang 6White Collar Crime
Definition: A variety of nonviolent
illegal acts against society that
occur most frequently in the
business context
Trang 7Crimes Affecting Business: “White
Trang 8Bribery
Definition: The offering, giving,
soliciting, or receiving of money or any
object of value for the purpose of
influencing the judgment or conduct of
a person in a position of trust
Trang 9Extortion (Blackmail)
Definition: The making of threats
for the purpose of obtaining
money or property
Trang 10Fraud
Definition: A variety of means by
which an individual intentionally
uses some sort of misrepresentation
to gain advantage over another
person
Trang 11Elements of Fraud
• A material false representation
made with intent to deceive;
• A victim’s reasonable reliance
on the false representation; and
• Damages
Trang 13Definition: The wrongful conversion
of another’s property by one who is
lawfully in possession of that
property
Trang 14Computer Crime
Definition: Any wrongful act that is
directed against computers, uses
computers to commit a crime, or
involves computers
Trang 15Criminal Procedure
Trang 16Differences Between Criminal and Civil
Procedure
Criminal Procedure
• The government, through a
prosecutor, always brings the
criminal case
• The objective is punishment, in
the form of a criminal fine and/
• The objective is to remedy a wrong done to the plaintiff, so the defendant will either have
to pay money damages, or be subject to an equitable remedy (injunction or specific
performance)
Trang 17Constitutional Safeguards: The
Fourth Amendment
• Protection from “unreasonable
search and seizure”
• Restrictions on warrants
Trang 18Constitutional Safeguards: The
Fifth Amendment
• Prohibition of “double jeopardy”
• Right not to incriminate oneself
• Right to “due process”
Trang 19Constitutional Safeguards: The Sixth
Amendment
• Right to a speedy and public trial
• Right to a trial by an impartial jury of one’s peers
• Right to be informed of the accusations against
oneself
• Right to confront witnesses
• Right to have witnesses on one’s side
• Right to counsel at various stages of the
Trang 20Constitutional Safeguards: The Eighth
Amendment
• Freedom from excessive bail
• Freedom from excessive fines
• Freedom from cruel and unusual
punishment
Trang 21Constitutional Safeguards: The
Fourteenth Amendment
• Extension of the right to due process
to all state matters
• Extension of most constitutional
rights to defendants at the state level
Trang 23“Miranda Rights” Before a law enforcement officer engages
in “custodial interrogation,” he/she must inform the defendant
• “You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking
to the police and have an attorney present during any questioning now or in the future”
• “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for
you before the questioning begins”
• “If you do not have an attorney available, you have the
right to remain silent until you have had an opportunity to consult with one”
• “Now that I have advised you of your rights, are you
willing to answer any questions without an attorney present?”
Trang 26Criminal Procedure: Posttrial
Procedure
• If jury returns verdict of not guilty,
government (prosecution) cannot appeal
the acquittal
• If jury returns verdict of guilty, defendant
may appeal verdict by claiming prejudicial
error of law at trial
• If no appeal, defendant sentenced after
judge receives additional information
relevant to sentencing
Trang 27The Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
• Prohibits persons employed by or
associated with an enterprise from
engaging in a pattern of racketeering
activity
• Anyone whose business or property has
been damaged can sue to recover treble
damages and attorney fees in a civil action
Trang 28The False Claims Act
• Allows employees to sue employers on
behalf of the federal government
• Employee retains share of recovery
Trang 29The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
• Passed by Congress in response to the business
scandals of the early 2000s (Examples: Enron,
WorldCom, Global Crossing, Arthur Anderson)
• Criminalizes specific non-audit services when
provided by a registered accounting firm to an
audit client
• Increases the punishment for a number of
white-collar offenses
• Extends the statute of limitations regarding the
discovery of fraud (two years from the date of
discovery of the fraud, five years from the date of
the criminal act)