Solutions to exercises Discussion questions E11.1b A successful theory of black-body radiation must be able to explain the energy density distribution of the radiation as a function of w
Trang 3Solutions to exercises
Discussion questions
E11.1(b) A successful theory of black-body radiation must be able to explain the energy density distribution of
the radiation as a function of wavelength, in particular, the observed drop to zero asλ → 0 Classical
theory predicts the opposite However, if we assume, as did Planck, that the energy of the oscillators that constitute electromagnetic radiation are quantized according to the relationE = nhν = nhc/λ,
we see that at short wavelengths the energy of the oscillators is very large This energy is too large for the walls to supply it, so the short-wavelength oscillators remain unexcited The effect of quantization
is to reduce the contribution to the total energy emitted by the black-body from the high-energy short-wavelength oscillators, for they cannot be sufficiently excited with the energy available
E11.2(b) In quantum mechanics all dynamical properties of a physical system have associated with them a
corresponding operator The system itself is described by a wavefunction The observable properties
of the system can be obtained in one of two ways from the wavefunction depending upon whether or not the wavefunction is an eigenfunction of the operator
When the function representing the state of the system is an eigenfunction of the operator, we
solve the eigenvalue equation (eqn 11.30)
= ω
in order to obtain the observable values,ω, of the dynamical properties.
When the function is not an eigenfunction of, we can only find the average or expectation value
of dynamical properties by performing the integration shown in eqn 11.39
=
∗ dτ.
E11.3(b) No answer
Numerical exercises
E11.4(b) The power is equal to the excitanceM times the emitting area
P = MA = σT4(2πrl)
= (5.67 × 10−8W m−2K−4) × (3300 K)4× (2π) × (0.12 × 10−3m) × (5.0 × 10−2m)
= 2.5 × 102W
Comment This could be a 250 W incandescent light bulb.
E11.5(b) Wien’s displacement law is
T λmax= c2/5 so λmax= c2
5T =
1.44 × 10−2m K
5(2500 K) = 1.15 × 10−6m= 1.15 µm
E11.6(b) The de Broglie relation is
h
h
6.626 × 10−34J s
(1.675 × 10−27kg) × (3.0 × 10−2m)
v = 1.3 × 10−5m s−1
Trang 4E11.7(b) The de Broglie relation is
h
h
6.626 × 10−34J s
(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (0.45 × 10−9m)
v = 1.6 × 106m s−1
E11.8(b) The momentum of a photon is
p = h
λ =
6.626 × 10−34J s
350× 10−9m = 1.89 × 10−27kg m s−1
The momentum of a particle is
1.89 × 10−27kg m s−1
2(1.0078 × 10−3kg mol−1/6.022 × 1023mol−1)
v = 0.565 m s−1
E11.9(b) The energy of the photon is equal to the ionization energy plus the kinetic energy of the ejected
electron
Ephoton= Eionize+ Eelectron so hc
λ = Eionize+1
2mv2
andλ = hc
Eionize+1
2mv2 = (6.626 × 10−34J s) × (2.998 × 108m s−1)
5.12 × 10−18J+1
2(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (345 × 103m s−1)2
= 3.48 × 10−8m= 38.4 nm
E11.10(b) The uncertainty principle is
px ≥ 1
2h¯
so the minimum uncertainty in position is
x = h¯
2p =
¯
h
2mv =
1.0546 × 10−34J s
2(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (0.000 010) × (995 × 103m s−1)
= 5.8 × 10−6m
E11.11(b) E = hν = hc λ; E(per mole) = NAE = NAhc
λ
hc = (6.62608 × 10−34J s) × (2.99792 × 108m s−1) = 1.986 × 10−25J m
NAhc = (6.02214 × 1023mol−1) × (1.986 × 10−25J m) = 0.1196 J m mol−1
Thus,E = 1.986 × 10−25J m
λ ; E(per mole) =
0.1196 J m mol−1 λ
We can therefore draw up the following table
Trang 5λ E/J E/(kJ mol−1)
(a) 200 nm 9.93 × 10−19 598
(b) 150 pm 1.32 × 10−15 7.98 × 105
(c) 1.00 cm 1.99 × 10−23 0.012
E11.12(b) Assuming that the4He atom is free and stationary, if a photon is absorbed, the atom acquires its
momentump, achieving a speed v such that p = mv.
v = m p m = 4.00 × 1.6605 × 10−27kg= 6.64¯2 × 10−27kg
p = h λ
(a) p = 6.626 × 10−34J s
200× 10−9m = 3.31¯3 × 10−27kg m s−1
v = m p = 3.31¯3 × 10−27kg m s−1
6.642 × 10−27kg = 0.499 m s−1
(b) p = 6.626 × 10−34J s
150× 10−12m = 4.41¯7 × 10−24kg m s−1
v = m p = 4.41¯7 × 10−24kg m s−1
6.642 × 10−27kg = 665 m s−1
(c) p = 6.626 × 10−34J s
1.00 × 10−2m = 6.626 × 10−32kg m s−1
v = m p = 6.626 × 10−32kg m s−1
6.642 × 10−27kg = 9.98 × 10−6m s−1
E11.13(b) Each emitted photon increases the momentum of the rocket byh/λ The final momentum of the
rocket will beNh/λ, where N is the number of photons emitted, so the final speed will be λm Nh
rocket
The rate of photon emission is the power (rate of energy emission) divided by the energy per photon (hc/λ), so
N = tP λ hc and v =
tP λ
hc
×
h
λmrocket
= cm tP
rocket
v = (10.0 yr) × (365 day yr−1) × (24 h day−1) × (3600 s h−1) × (1.50 × 103W)
(2.998 × 108m s−1) × (10.0 kg)
= 158 m s−1
E11.14(b) Rate of photon emission is rate of energy emission (power) divided by energy per photon (hc/λ)
(a) rate=P λ
hc =
(0.10 W) × (700 × 10−9m) (6.626 × 10−34J s) × (2.998 × 108m s−1) = 3.52 × 1017s−1
(b) rate= (1.0 W) × (700 × 10−9m)
(6.626 × 10−34J s) × (2.998 × 108m s−1) = 3.52 × 1018s−1
E11.15(b) Wien’s displacement law is
T λmax= c2/5 so T = c2
5λmax = 1.44 × 10−2m K
5(1600 × 10−9m) = 1800 K
Trang 6E11.16(b) Conservation of energy requires
Ephoton= + EK= hν = hc/λ so EK= hc/λ −
andEK=1
2mev2
sov =
2EK
me
1/2
(a) EK= (6.626 × 10−34J s) × (2.998 × 108m s−1)
650× 10−9m − (2.09 eV) × (1.60 × 10−19J eV−1)
But this expression is negative, which is unphysical There is no kinetic energy or velocity because the photon does not have enough energy to dislodge the electron
(b) EK= (6.626 × 10−34J s) × (2.998 × 108m s−1)
195× 10−9m − (2.09 eV) × (1.60 × 10−19J eV−1)
= 6.84 × 10−19J andv =
2(3.20 × 10−19J)
9.11 × 10−31kg
1/2
= 1.23 × 106m s−1
E11.17(b) E = hν = h/τ, so
(a) E = 6.626 × 10−34J s/2.50 × 10−15s= 2.65 × 10−19J= 160 kJ mol−1
(b) E = 6.626 × 10−34J s/2.21 × 10−15s= 3.00 × 10−19J= 181 kJ mol−1
(c) E = 6.626 × 10−34J s/1.0 × 10−3s= 6.62 × 10−31J= 4.0 × 10−10kJ mol−1
E11.18(b) The de Broglie wavelength is
λ = h
p
The momentum is related to the kinetic energy by
EK= p2
2m so p = (2mEK)1/2
The kinetic energy of an electron accelerated through 1 V is 1 eV= 1.60 × 10−19J, so
(2mEK)1/2
Trang 7(a) λ = 6.626 × 10−34J s
(2(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (100 eV) × (1.60 × 10−19J eV−1))1/2
= 1.23 × 10−10m
(2(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (1.0 × 103eV) × (1.60 × 10−19J eV−1))1/2
= 3.9 × 10−11m
(2(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (100 × 103eV) × (1.60 × 10−19J eV−1))1/2
= 3.88 × 10−12m
E11.19(b) The minimum uncertainty in position is 100 pm Therefore, sincexp ≥ 1
2¯h
p ≥ ¯h
2x =
1.0546 × 10−34J s
2(100 × 10−12m) = 5.3 × 10−25kg m s−1
5.3 × 10−25kg m s−1
9.11 × 10−31kg = 5.8 × 10−5m s−1
E11.20(b) Conservation of energy requires
Ephoton= Ebinding+1
2mev2= hν = hc/λ so Ebinding= hc/λ −1
2mev2
andEbinding=(6.626 × 10−34J s) × (2.998 × 108m s−1)
121× 10−12m
−1
2(9.11 × 10−31kg) × (5.69 × 107m s−1)2
= 1.67 × 10−16J
Comment This calculation uses the non-relativistic kinetic energy, which is only about 3 per cent
less than the accurate (relativistic) value of 1.52 × 10−15J In this exercise, however,Ebindingis a small difference of two larger numbers, so a small error in the kinetic energy results in a larger error
inEbinding: the accurate value isEbinding= 1.26 × 10−16J
Solutions to problems
Solutions to numerical problems
k , [θE]=
J s× s−1
J K−1 = K
In terms ofθEthe Einstein equation [11.9] for the heat capacity of solids is
C V = 3R
θE
T
2
×
eθE/2T
eθE/T − 1
2
, classical value = 3R
It reverts to the classical value when T θE or when hν
kT
(Section 11.1) The criterion for classical behaviour is therefore that T θE
θE= hν k = (6.626 × 10−34J Hz−1) × ν
1.381 × 10−23J K−1 = 4.798 × 10−11(ν/Hz)K
Trang 8(a) Forν = 4.65 × 1013Hz, θE= (4.798 × 10−11) × (4.65 × 1013K) = 2231 K
(b) Forν = 7.15 × 1012Hz, θE= (4.798 × 10−11) × (7.15 × 1012K) = 343 K
Hence
(a) C V
3R =
2231 K
298 K
2
×
e223¯1/(2×298)
e2231/298− 1
2
= 0.031
(b) C V
3R =
343 K
298 K
2
×
e343/(2×298)
e343/298− 1
2
= 0.897
Comment For many metals the classical value is approached at room temperature; consequently,
the failure of classical theory became apparent only after methods for achieving temperatures well below 25◦C were developed in the latter part of the nineteenth century.
P11.5 The hydrogen atom wavefunctions are obtained from the solution of the Schr¨odinger equation in
Chapter 13 Here we need only the wavefunction which is provided It is the square of the wavefunction that is related to the probability (Section 11.4)
ψ2= 1
πa3 0
e−2r/a0, δτ = 4
3πr3
0, r0= 1.0 pm
If we assume that the volumeδτ is so small that ψ does not vary within it, the probability is given by
ψ2δτ = 4r03
3a3 0
e−2r/a0 =4
3 ×
1.0
53
3
e−2r/a0
(a) r = 0 : ψ2δτ = 4
3
1.0
53
3
= 9.0 × 10−6
(b) r = a0: ψ2δτ = 4
3
1.0
53
3
e−2 = 1.2 × 10−6
Question If there is a nonzero probability that the electron can be found atr = 0 how does it avoid
destruction at the nucleus? (Hint See Chapter 13 for part of the solution to this difficult question.)
P11.7 According to the uncertainty principle,
pq ≥ 1
2h,¯ whereq and p are root-mean-square deviations:
q = (x2 − x2)1/2 and p = (p2 − p2)1/2
To verify whether the relationship holds for the particle in a state whose wavefunction is
= (2a/π)1/4e−ax2
,
We need the quantum-mechanical averagesx, x2, p, and p2
x =
∗x2 dτ =
∞
∞−
2a π
1/4
e−ax2
x
2a π
1/4
e−ax2
dx,
Trang 9x =
2a π
1/2 ∞
−∞
xe −2ax2
dx = 0;
x2 =
∞
−∞
2a π
1/4
e−ax2
x2
2a π
1/4
e−ax2
dx =
2a π
1/2 ∞
∞−
x2e−2ax2
dx,
x2 =
2a π
1/2
π1/2
2(2a)3/2 = 1
4a;
so q = 1
2a1/2
p =
∞
−∞
∗
¯
h
i
d
dx
dx and p2 =
∞
−∞
∗
−¯h2d2
dx2
dx.
We need to evaluate the derivatives:
d
dx =
2a π
1/4 (−2ax)e −ax2
and d
2
dx2 =
2a π
1/4 [(−2ax)2e−ax2
+ (−2a)e −ax2]=
2a π
1/4
(4a2x2− 2a)e −ax2.
So p =
∞
−∞
2a π
1/4
e−ax2
¯
h
i
2a π
1/4
(−2ax)e −ax2 dx
= −2¯h i
2a π
1/2 ∞
−∞
xe −2ax2dx = 0;
p2 =
∞
−∞
2a π
1/4
e−ax2
(−¯h2)
2a π
1/4
(4a2x2− 2a)e −ax2
dx,
p2 = (−2a¯h2)
2a π
1/2 ∞
−∞
(2ax2− 1)e −2ax2
dx,
p2 = (−2a¯h2)
2a π
1/2
2a π1/2
2(2a)3/2− π1/2
(2a)1/2
= a¯h2; and p = a1/2¯h.
Finally, qp = 1
2a1/2 × a1/2¯h = 1/2¯h,
which is the minimum product consistent with the uncertainty principle
Trang 10Solutions to theoretical problems
P11.9 We look for the value ofλ at which ρ is a maximum, using (as appropriate) the short-wavelength
(high-frequency) approximation
ρ = 8πhc
λ5
1
ehc/λkT − 1
[11.5]
dρ
dλ = −
5
λ ρ +
hc
λ2kT
ehc/λkT
ehc/λkT − 1
ρ = 0 at λ = λmax
Then,−5 + hc
ehc/λkT
ehc/λkT − 1 = 0 Hence, 5− 5ehc/λkT + hc
λkTehc/λkT = 0
If hc
λkT 1 [short wavelengths, high frequencies], this expression simplifies We neglect the initial 5,
cancel the two exponents, and obtain
hc = 5λkT for λ = λmax and hc
λkT 1
or λmaxT = hc
5k = 2.88 mm K , in accord with observation.
Comment Most experimental studies of black-body radiation have been done over a wavelength
range of a factor of 10 to 100 of the wavelength of visible light and over a temperature range of 300 K
to 10 000 K.
Question Does the short-wavelength approximation apply over all of these ranges? Would it apply
to the cosmic background radiation of the universe at 2.7 K where λmax≈ 0.2 cm?
P11.10 ρ = 8πhc
λ5
1
ehc/λkT − 1
[11.5]
Asλ increases, hc
λkT decreases, and at very long wavelength
the exponential in a power series Letx = hc/λkT , then
ex = 1 + x + 1
2!x2+ 1 3!x3+ · · ·
ρ = 8πhc
λ5
1
1+ x + 1
2!x2+ 1 3!x3+ · · · − 1
lim
λ→∞ ρ = 8πhc
λ5
1
1+ x − 1
= 8πhc
λ5
1
hc/λkT
= 8πkT
λ4
This is the Rayleigh–Jeans law [11.3]
Trang 11P11.12 ρ = 8πhc
ehc/λkT − 1 [11.5]
∂ρ
40πhc
1
ehc/λkT − 1
−
8πhc
λ5
×e
hc/λkT × −λ hc2kT
ehc/λkT − 1 2
= 8πhc
λ5 ×
1
ehc/λkT − 1
×
−λ5+ hc
λ2kT
ehc/λkT
ehc/λkT − 1
=
−5
λ
× ρ
1− hc
5λkT
1
1− e−hc/λkT
∂ρ
∂λ = 0 when λ = λmax and
hc
5λmaxkT
1
1− e−hc/λmaxkT
= 1
5λmaxkT
hc 1− e−hc/λmaxkT
= 1
Letx = hc
λmaxkT; then
5
x
1− e−x = 1 or 5
x =
1
1− e−x
The solution of this equation isx = 4.965.
Thenh = 4.965λmaxkT
However
M = σ T4=
2π5k4
15c2h3
Substituting (1) into (2) yields
M ≈
2π5k4
15c2
×
c
4.965λmaxkT
3
T4
≈ 2π5ckT
1835.9λ3 max
k ≈ 1835.9λ3maxM
2π5cT
≈ 1835.9(1.451 × 10−6m)3× (904.48 × 103W)
2π5(2.998 × 108m s−1) × (2000 K) × (1.000 m2)
Trang 12Substituting (3) into (1)
h ≈ 5(1.451 × 10−6m) × (1.382 × 10−23J K−1) × (2000 K)
2.998 × 108m s−1
h ≈ 6.69 × 10−34J s
Comment These calculated values are very close to the currently accepted values for these constants P11.14 In each case formNψ; integrate
(Nψ)∗(Nψ) dτ
set the integral equal to 1 and solve forN.
2−a r
0
e−r/2a0
ψ2= N2
2−a r
0
2
e−r/a0
ψ2dτ = N2
∞
0
4r2−4r3
a0 +r4
a2 0
e−r/a0dr
π
0
sinθ dθ
2π
0
dφ
= N2
4× 2a3
0− 4 ×6a04
a0 +24a
5 0
a2 0
× (2) × (2π) = 32πa3
0N2;
hence N =
1
32πa3 0
1/2
where we have used
∞
0
x ne−axdx = n!
a n+1 [Problem 11.13]
(b) ψ = Nr sin θ cos φ e −r/(2a0)
ψ2dτ = N2
∞
0 r4e−r/a0dr
π
0
sin2θ sin θ dθ
2π
0
cos2φ dφ
= N24!a5
0
1
−1(1 − cos2θ) d cos θ × π
= N24!a5
0
2−2 3
π = 32πa5
0N2
0; hence N =
1
32πa5 0
1/2
where we have used
π
0
cosn θ sin θ dθ = −
−1
1
cosn θ d cos θ =
1
−1x ndx
and the relations at the end of the solution to Problem 11.8 [See Student’s solutions manual.]
Trang 13P11.16 Operate on each function with i; if the function is regenerated multiplied by a constant, it is an
eigenfunction ofi and the constant is the eigenvalue.
(a) f = x3− kx
i(x3− kx) = −x3+ kx = −f
Therefore,f is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue, −1
(b) f = cos kx
i cos kx = cos(−kx) = cos kx = f
Therefore,f is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue, +1
(c) f = x2+ 3x − 1
i(x2+ 3x − 1) = x2− 3x − 1 = constant × f
Therefore,f is not an eigenfunction of i.
P11.19 The kinetic energy operator, ˆT , is obtained from the operator analogue of the classical equation
EK= p2
2m
that is,
ˆT = ( ˆp)2
2m
ˆp x =h¯ i
d
dx [11.32]; hence ˆp2x = −¯h2
d2
dx2 and ˆT = − h¯2
2m
d2
dx2
Then
T = N2
ψ∗
ˆp2
x
2m
ψ dτ =
ψ∗ 2ˆp m2ψ dτ
ψ∗ψ dτ
N2= 1
ψ∗ψ dτ
= −¯h
2
2m
ψ∗ ddx22(eikxcosχ + e −ikxsinχ) dτ
ψ∗ψ dτ
= −¯h
2
2m
ψ∗(−k2) × (eikxcosχ + e −ikxsinχ) dτ
¯
h2k2
ψ∗ψ dτ
2m ψ∗ψ dτ =
¯
h2k2
2m
P11.20 p x =h¯
i
d
dx [11.32]
p x = N2
ψ∗ˆp x ψ dx; N2= 1
ψ∗ψ dτ
=
ψ∗ˆp x ψ dx
ψ∗ψ dx =
¯
h
i
ψ∗ dψ
dx
dx
ψ∗ψ dx
(a) ψ = eikx , dψ
dx = ikψ
Hence,
p x =
¯
h
i × ikψ∗ψ dx
ψ∗ψ dx = k¯h
Trang 14(b) ψ = cos kx, dψ
dx = −k sin kx
∞
−∞ψ∗dψ
dx dx = −k
∞
−∞coskx sin kx dx = 0
Therefore,p x = 0
(c) ψ = e −αx2, dψ
dx = −2αxe −αx
2
∞
−∞ψ∗dψ
dx dx = −2α
∞
−∞xe −2αx2dx = 0 [by symmetry, since x is an odd function]
Therefore,p x = 0
P11.23 No solution
Solution to applications
P11.27 (a) Consider any infinitesimal volume element dx dy dz within the hemisphere (Figure 11.1) that
has a radius equal to the distance traveled by light in the time dt (c dt) The objective is to find the
total radiation flux perpendicular to the hemisphere face at its center Imagine an infinitesimal areaA at that point Let r be the distance from dx dy dz to A and imagine the infinitesimal
areaA perpendicular tor E is the total isotropic energy density in dx dy dz E dx dy dz is
the energy emitted in dt A/4πr2is the fraction of this radiation that passes throughA The radiation flux that originates from dx dy dz and passes through Ain dt is given by:
J A = ✁
A
4πr2
E dx dy dz
E dx dy dz
4πr2dt
The contribution ofJ A to the radiation flux throughA, J A, is given by the expressionJ A ×
(A cos θ)/A = J Acosθ The integration of this expression over the whole hemisphere gives an
c dt
c dt
A
J A
J A⬘
dx dy dz
A⬘
Figure 11.1
... thathas a radius equal to the distance traveled by light in the time dt (c dt) The objective is to find the
total radiation flux perpendicular to the hemisphere face at its... Schrăodinger equation in
Chapter 13 Here we need only the wavefunction which is provided It is the square of the wavefunction that is related to the probability (Section 11.4)
ψ2=... ndx
and the relations at the end of the solution to Problem 11.8 [See Student’s solutions manual. ]
Trang 13