Slides 3 4 calculate cost of service with multiple cost poo

Terminal Learning Objective• Task: Calculate Cost of Service with Multiple Cost Pools/Drivers • Condition: You are training to become an ACE with access to ICAM course handouts, reading

Calculate Cost of Service with Multiple Cost Pools and

Drivers

Intermediate Cost Analysis

and Management

1

Why did this cost measurement method fail?

Fillet and Lobster 35.00 Chicken Kiev 15.00 Top Sirloin 20.00 Caesar Salad 9.00 Coffee 2 @1.00 2.00 House Wine 4 @5.00 20.00 Champagne 24.00 Ice Cream 4.00 Chocolate Cheesecake 6.00 Sampler 10.00 Soup/Salad 8.00 Aperitif 7 00

Chez Paris

Carol

Alice

Terminal Learning Objective

• Task: Calculate Cost of Service with Multiple Cost Pools/Drivers

• Condition: You are training to become an ACE with access to ICAM course

handouts, readings, and spreadsheet tools and awareness of Operational

Environment (OE)/Contemporary Operational Environment (COE) variables and actors

• Standard: with at least 80% accuracy:

• Identify 3 methods of distribution

• Discuss relative merits of each

• Describe need for homogeneity in pools/drivers

• Describe need for correlation between pool and driver

• Select suitable driver for cost pool 

3

Review: Managerial Costing

raw accounting data

managerial costing

cost pool

method of distribution

Review: Terminology

• Method of distribution:

• The mechanics of deriving management information

from the cost pool

• Example:

• Determine unit cost by adding all input

costs and dividing by number of units

method of distribution

5

Alternative Methods of Distribution

• Managers can obtain the needed view of cost in several ways

• Guessing: gut feel of cost distribution

• Direct costing: detailed record keeping of all incurred cost transactions by every cost object

• Allocation: distribution of cost pool in the same proportion as a cost driver

Applications for Guessing

• Simple situations where:

• Cost of measurement error is small

• Need for credibility is low

• Ability to hold someone accountable is

missing

• Cost of cost measurement is high

guessing and gut feel

7

Detailed Record Keeping Applications

• Labor cost can be accounted for by product

through time and attendance reporting

• Project costs can include supplies and

services charged by job order

• Product material costs can be determined

through bill of materials

detailed record keeping

Examples of Detailed Record Keeping

• Job order charges

• Bill of materials system

• Time and attendance reporting

9

Why Not Use Detailed Record Keeping for All Cost?

• May not be practical

• Will be more expensive

• May not be necessary

• Probably less flexible

• May not be possible

• Joint costs and overhead costs often

consumed by more than one cost object

method of distribution

An Extreme Example

• Consider the accountant at Detailed Transaction Command

• Changes pencils every time he writes a transaction for a different cost object

• Writes a materials ticket for each pencil issued to each cost object

• Maintains meticulous time records

whenever he changes pencils

• Wonders what to do about cost of pencil sharpener?

11

Method of Distribution Comparison

cost of method accuracy flexibilityguessing cheap poor good

direct very expensive good poor

Review: Allocation

• Allocation:

• A method of distribution that distributes cost pool to

cost objects in the same proportion as cost driver

• Example:

• Distributing the cost of utilities to occupants in the

same proportion as space occupied

allocation based on cost driver

13

cost pool

Most Systems Combine Methods

detailed record keeping

detailed record keeping

allocation based on cost driver

allocation based on cost driver

Production Control

Management Receptionist

Choosing a Method of Distribution

• Use guessing for simple decision making

• Keep detailed records when accounting cost is low and high accuracy useful

• Allocate overhead, support, and indirect costs when appropriate

• Consider management’s needs for precision and timeliness

Discussion: Telephone Charges

• Should these be allocated or charged via detailed, call-by-call records?

• Issues to consider

• What does management need?

• Is telephoning a core mission or support function?

• Are detailed records available?

17

Learning Check

• Which method of distribution is the least expensive?

• Which method is the most accurate?

Facilities Case

• An Army Installation has four Companies that occupy five buildings Incurred costs of $100,000 include utilities, building maintenance, and miscellaneous facilities related expenditures New policies require the Installation to charge its costs back to Companies

• Using the Allocation Worksheet and the following information, prepare a cost allocation:

Company A

Company B

Company C

Company D Number of

19

• What are the cost objects?

• What is the cost driver?

• What is the rate per building?

• What is each company’s proportion?

• What assumptions are made in using number of buildings as a cost driver?

• Is this a good method of distribution?

What Difference Does

it Make?

• Some of the buildings are small?

• One of the building is the pentagon?

≠

Facilities Case B

• Not surprisingly, the Company Commanders were not pleased to hear about the Facilities assessment However, the Company B brought up a valid point: Why should his organization, which occupies a small building, receive the same allocation as Company D, which occupies a substantially larger building? Taking this into consideration, the Facilities manager decided to re-allocate the $100,000 on the basis of Square Footage occupied by each organization

Company A

Company B

Company C

Company D Square

• What are the cost objects?

• What is the cost driver?

• What is the rate per square foot?

• What is each company’s proportion?

• Is this a better method of distribution?

• Identify cross subsidizations and free goods created by the Case A method

25

Facilities Case C

• At this point, the manager of Company D protested Yes, he did have a large building, but it was not air conditioned By his estimates, which were reasonably accurate, forty percent of the facilities expenditures were air conditioning related These expenses included the

additional electricity, maintenance and repair needed to keep the air conditioning units running.

Facilities Case C

• Company D proposed dividing the Facilities Costs into two separate cost pools: one for Air-Conditioning related costs, and one for General Facilities costs The General cost pool would be allocated on the basis of square footage, just as before The Air Conditioning cost pool would be allocated on the basis of air

conditioned square footage.

Company A

Company B

Company C

Company D Square

A/C Square

Total Cost Pool $100K

Company D’s Method

Air Conditioning Cost Pool

$40K

Air Conditioning Cost Pool

$40K

General Cost Pool

$60K

General Cost Pool

$60K

Allocation Spreadsheet

Select drivers for each activity

• What is the new rate per square foot?

• What is the rate per air conditioned square foot?

• Identify any cross subsidizations and free goods created by Case B’s method

• Is this a better method of distribution?

• Why might this method not reflect true cost?

31

Good Method Test

• Case A is a good method IF

• All buildings are the same

• Case B is a good method IF

• All square feet are the same

• Case C is a good method IF

• All general square feet are the same AND

•

Don’t Forget Behavioral Impacts

• What undesired behavior is encouraged with allocation by number of buildings

• Combining buildings one roof

• Expanding buildings when new building might make more sense

• Rejecting assignment to small building

• In-fighting to occupy large air conditioned buildings

33

Learning Check

• What happens to an object’s overhead allocation as its proportion of cost driver increases?

• If the unit of measure for the cost driver is dollars, what will be the unit of

measure for the driver rate?

• Making assumptions is inescapable in managerial costing

• There is simply too much to measure and too many ways to measure it

• Reasonable assumptions simplify and facilitate the measurement process

• Bad assumptions result in poor management decision making

35

Homogeneity and Averaging

• Allocation methods implicitly assume sameness or homogeneity

• Allocating the dinner check based on number of eaters assumes that all eaters consume resources equally

• Allocating facilities costs based on number of buildings assumes that all

buildings consume facilities resources equally

Homogeneity and Averaging

• The homogeneity assumption allows the use of average cost

• To simplify the allocation process

• To minimize the cost of measurement

• To avoid detailed record keeping for every cost object

37

Cause and Effect Relationships

• A cause and effect relationship means:

• Increasing driver usage will cause more consumption of resources

• Decreasing driver usage will cause less resource consumption

• Allocating cost based on this driver will reflect the underlying economics of cost

consumption and approximate true cost

Cause and Effect Relationships

• Give the cost manager another target for managing cost

• Managing the driver usage will result in managing cost

• Allow managers to make rational decisions based on knowledge of true cost

• Instead of over-consuming goods and services that appear to be free or low-cost

39

Common Examples of

Cause - Effect Cost Drivers

• Square footage Heating costs

• Number of employees Personnel costs

• Mileage Motor pool costs

• Computer hours  Computer costs

• Others?

Learning Check

• What is the underlying assumption when choosing a cost driver?

• A cause-effect relationship means that when the driver usage is reduced, the

will also decrease

41

Contracts Office Case

• The contracts office at Fort Apache incurs annual costs of $1 million These costs are

currently distributed to companies A, B, and C on the basis of their number of

soldiers

• How much is each company allocated?

Contracts Case: Questions

• What is the Cost Pool?

• What is the Cost Object?

• What is the Cost Driver?

• What is the rate?

• What is each Company’s proportion?

43

Contracts Case: Results

0 500

Contracts Case:

Discussion Questions

• Is “number of soldiers” a good cost driver?

• Will decreasing soldiers decrease consumption of contracts resources?

• What undesired behaviors might be encouraged by this method of distribution?

45

Contracts Office: Case B

• Company C’s captain finds his allocation unacceptable He rejects being charged $450K when he does not have any contracts and suggests using number of contracts as the cost driver.

• How is cost allocated with this cost driver?

Contracts Case B: Questions

• What is the Cost Pool?

• What is the Cost Object?

• What is the Cost Driver?

• What is the rate?

• What is each Company’s proportion?

47

Contracts Case B: Results

0 500

Balloon Squeezing

• Company A’s cost doubles

• Company B’s cost increases 67%

• Total cost remains unchanged

• A change in distribution means:

• If one command’s allocation goes DOWN by $1000 Then

• Someone else’s allocation has to go UP by $1000

• (Zero sum game requires support of top management in order to succeed)

49

Contracts Case B: Discussion Questions

• Is “number of contracts” a good cost driver?

• Will decreasing number of contracts decrease consumption of contracts

resources?

• What undesired behaviors might be encouraged by this method?

Contracts Office: Case C

• Company B labels these results wrong and points out that its contracts are relatively

simple and that it always complies with contracts’ procedure and lead time requests The Company CO suggests that a survey of contracts’ efforts be used as the cost driver.

• How are costs allocated on this basis?

51

Contracts Case C: Results

0 1000

Contracts Office: Case D

• Company A argues strongly that it cannot afford $600k for contracts without

compromising its mission The company CO, the most senior and forceful of the

company CO’s, demands that “something fair, like the number of soldiers wearing

53

Contracts Case: Results

0 200

400

600

600

Cost Consumption Method Results:

Cost Driver Distribution Profiles:

Contracts: Discussion Questions

• Is “number of soldiers wearing glasses” a good cost driver?

• (Never forget that we accountants are trained to deal with nonsense)

• Which driver would you recommend

• If you are any of the company commanders?

• If you are the installation commander?

55

Driver Selection:

Issues to Consider

• Does the proposed driver correlate with resource consumption?

• Less driver causes less resource

• More driver causes more resource

• Does the proposed driver motivate desirable behavior?

• Cost conscious managers will work to reduce the driver

• Does less driver benefit the organization?

Contracts Case: Lessons

• Using cost driver to allocate is easy

• Choosing the right cost driver may be hard

• Cannot ignore behavioral implications

• So count on them

• Design system to motivate desired behavior

• True economic cost usually motivates the right cost management behavior

57

Learning Check

• What does “balloon squeezing” mean?

• What should be considered when choosing a cost driver?

Why Level of Effort Analysis?

• Many costs are not easily correlated with cost objects

• Less true in manufacturing

• Very true in service

• Level of effort analysis technique easily:

• Produces a customized driver of reasonable accuracy allocation

based on cost driver

59

Overhead: Likely Candidate for Level of Effort (LOE)

• Overhead Areas Often Use LOE Since:

• Work Usually Specialized and Not Consumed Uniformly by Line Organizations

• Like the Contracts Office

• Lack of Consumption Homogeneity May Mean that Common Drivers are Poor

• i.e Square Feet, Direct Labor Hours, Mileage, etc., Do not Adequately Correlate to Cost Object Consumption of Overhead Resources

Developing LOE as a Driver

• Interview Activity Manager

• Concentrate on People’s “Efforts” Supporting Cost Objects

• Find out What Proportion of Each Person’s Time would be “Invoiced” to Each Cost Object if Activity was a Business and Cost Object was a Customer

61

Precision and LOE

• Activity Manager Will Only be Able to Make Rough Estimates

• Estimates Get Better Over Time

• Random Estimate Errors Tend to Offset

• Systematic Error Can Induce Bias

• Saliency Can Induce Bias

Beneficial By-Products

• Staff/overhead organizations often misunderstand their role

• It’s easy for staff to think they are line

• Often helpful to organization when staff functions are forced to think of their line customers as paying the bills

• Publicizing LOE creates a forum for cost and support issues

63

Level of Effort Example

Don’t Forget Homogeneity Assumption

• Implicit assumptions:

• Effort costs the same for each person

• Other costs proportional to people

• If Ted is a lawyer and others are paralegals, the level of effort is biased

• Use weighting factor, or

• Make two separate activities if bias is significant

65

Criticism of Level of Effort

• Bias is possible due to “saliency”

• Recent problems are fresh in mind

• Suppose C had a big problem last month

• Produces significantly more error

67