Acoustic and electromagnetic scattering analysis using discrete sources III systems of functions in acoustic theory Acoustic and electromagnetic scattering analysis using discrete sources III systems of functions in acoustic theory Acoustic and electromagnetic scattering analysis using discrete sources III systems of functions in acoustic theory Acoustic and electromagnetic scattering analysis using discrete sources III systems of functions in acoustic theory Acoustic and electromagnetic scattering analysis using discrete sources III systems of functions in acoustic theory
Trang 1dis-be linearly independent since only then can the matrices appearing in the numerical schemes be inverted
This chapter is devoted to the analysis of complete and linear dent systems of functions for the Helmholtz equation As complete systems
indepen-of functions we will discuss the systems indepen-of discrete sources There is a close relation between the properties of the fields of discrete sources and the structure of their support In particular if the supports are chosen as a point, a straight line, or a surface, then the corresponding systems of func-tions are the localized spherical wave functions, the distributed spherical wave functions and the distributed point sources, respectively
We begin this chapter by presenting some basic results on the pleteness of localized spherical wave functions In order to preserve the completeness at irregular frequencies linear combinations of regular func-tions and their normal derivatives on the particle surface will be used We then proceed to describe a general scheme for complete systems construc-
com-39
Trang 2tion using radiating solutions to the Helmholtz equation In particular, we
will discuss the completeness of distributed radiating spherical wave
func-tions After that, we will provide a similar scheme using entire solutions to
the Helmholtz equations The next section then concerns the completeness
of point sources Here, we will discuss the systems of functions with
singu-larities distributed on closed and open auxiliary surfaces In ađition, we
will analyze the completeness of distributed plane waves The last section
of this chapter deals with the linear independence of these systems
1 COMPLETE SYSTEMS OF FUNCTIONS
The completeness properties of the sets of localized spherical wave functions
and point sources have been studied exhaustively by means of different
representations theorems In this chapter we will present these basic results
but our main concern is to enlarge the class of complete systems
1.1 Localized spherical wave functions
We begin our analysis by establishing the completeness of the spherical
wave functions in L'^{S) These functions form a set of characteristic
so-lutions to the scalar wave equation in spherical coordinates and are given
by
ul;,lM = zi^^{kr)PJr^{cose) ế^^, n = 0,1, , m = - n , , n (3.1)
Here, (r, 0, (p) are the spherical coordinates of x, z^^ designates the spherical
Bessel functions jn» ^n stands for the spherical Hankel functions of the first
kind hn , and Pn denotes the associated Legendre polynomials Note that
ulnn is an entire solution to the Helmholtz equation and u^^ is a radiating
solution to the Helmholtz equation in R^ — {0}
The expansion of the Green function in terms of spherical wave
func-tions will frequently used in the sequel It is
,Ạ ^ J L f ^-mn(y)^mnW, IYI > |x|
^(x,y,A:) = ^ E E ^ - M ' (^-^^
n=Om=-n [ ul^^{y)ul,^{x), |y| < |x|
where the normalization constant Vmn is given by
_ 2 n - f l ( n - | m | ) !
^"^""" 4 ( n - f H ) ! ' ^^'^^ The main result of this section consists of the following theorem
Trang 3THEOREM 1,1: Let S be a closed surface of class C*^ and let n denote
the unit outward normal to 5 Then each of the systems
With Ua' (x) being the single-layer potential with density a' = a* we choose
X 6 D[, where £)[ is the interior of a spherical surface S^ enclosed in D^
For |y| > |x| we use the spherical waves expansion of the Green functions
and deduce that Ua' vanishes in D[ The analyticity of Ua' gives Ua' = 0 in
Z?i, whence, by theorem 2.2 of Chapter 2, a ~ 0 on 5 follows Analogously,
theorems 2.4 and 2.6 of the precedent chapter may be used to conclude the
proof of (a) The proof of the second part of the theorem proceed in the
same manner
For k G p{Di) the set of regular spherical wave functions
{wmn» ^ = 0^ 1»-M m = - n , , n}
is not complete in L^(5) The completeness can be preserved if a finite set
of functions representing a basis of iV (^/ — /C') is added to the original
system Before we prove this assertion let us recall some basic results
Trang 4The null-space of the operator ^ J —/C' corresponds to solutions to the
homogeneous interior Dirichlet problem, that means iV (^ J — /C') = V,
where V stands for the linear space
V = i | ^ /ve^{Di),Av-^k^v = OmDuv = Oons\
In addition
dim N (h: - K'\ = dim AT ( ^ i l - X:") = 0,
if k is not an interior Dirichlet eigenvalue, and
d i m A r Q l - r ^ =AimN(h:-}C\ =mD,
if k is an eigenvalue If {Sj}^J[ is a basis for AT ( ^ I — /C) and Vj stands
for the double-layer potential with density 6j, then 6j = Vj^ on S and the
functions Xj = dv*^/dn on 5, j = 1, ^TTIDI form a basis of N ( ^ J — /C')
Furthermore, the matrix T ^ = M^^L Tj^j = (Xfc»<5j), /c, j = l, ,mD, is
nonsingular Coming to the proof we observe that the closeness relations
Jg a'uln^ d S = 0, n = 0,1, , m = —n, , n, leads to the vanishing of the
single-layer potential Ua' in Dg- Then proceeding as in theorem 2.2 of the
precedent chapter we find that a' ^ UQ e C^'^'iS)^ where ( ^ J — /C') a^ =
0 Therefore, GQ = Yljl^i^jXj- Now, conditions / ^ a o X j d 5 = 0, j =
1, , m£), gives ag = 0 on 5, whence a ~ 0 on 5 follows On the other hand
if instead of the system {xj} ^^ we consider the set {6j}^J[ we observe
that from Jg a^Sj dS = 0, j = 1, , m o , we arrive at
when k e r]{Di) In this case a finite set of functions representing a basis for
iV ( ^ / -h /C) should be added to the original system Note that analogously
to the interior Dirichlet problem if {0j} J! is a basis for iV(^I-|-/C')
and Uj stands for the single-layer potential with density 0^, then 0^ =
Trang 5—dujj^/dn on 5 , the functions ^^ = ""^^4- ^^ '^^J ~ l, ,mAr, form a
basis of N {\l 4- K) , and the matrix Tjv = \T^} , I^^ = (^it, 0^) , A;, j =
l, ,miv, is nonsingular
We will now formulate the null-field equations in terms of spherical
wave functions
T H E O R E M 1.2: Let the surface field hg satisfy either the set of
null-field equations for the Dirichlet problem
n hs{y)nl,{y) + My)^iy) d5(y) = 0, n = 0,1, , m = - n , , n,
Then kg solves either (2.83) or (2.87), and conversely
Proof: The proof proceed as in theorem 1.1 by making use on the
spherical waves expansion of the scalar field given by
«(x)=y"[- /».(y)5(x,y,fc) + u o ( y ) ^ ^ ^ ^
S
d5(y), X € A , (3.8)
for the Dirichlet problem and by
"(X) = / [fe»(y)^^^^'(y)^^ + ^{y)p(x,y,fc)] d5(y), X e A , (3.9)
for the Neumann problem
1.2 Distributed spherical wave functions
In this section we will analyze the completeness properties of the spherical
wave functions distributed on a segment of the j^-axis For the moment
we confine ourself to the system of functions consisting in radiating
solu-tion to the Helmholtz equasolu-tion A specific scheme for complete systems
construction can be formulated as follows:
(a) Let { x n } ^ i C E represents the position vectors of the discrete
sources
Trang 6(b) Let Ua be the single-layer potential with density a and let us consider
the set of conditions
(£iXa) (xn) = 0, n = l , 2 , , (3.10)
which provide that Ua = 0 in Df Here C is some operator whose
significance will be clarified latter
Let us define the scalar functions fn by setting
/n(y) = ( £ x 5 ) ( x n , y ) , n = l,2, (3.11) Since
(Cua) (xn) = J a{y)fn{y)dS{y) = {fn, a*>2,5 (3.12)
s
we see that the closure relations for the system { / n } ^ i are equivalent to
the vanishing conditions (3.10) Thus, the following result is valid
T H E O R E M 1.3: Let S be a closed surface of class C^ Then the system
{ / n } ^ i is complete in L'^{S)
Two parameters are essential for complete system construction: the
support H of discrete sources and the vanishing conditions for the
single-layer potential in Di Both parameters determine the type of discrete
sources In general we can use as support a point, a curve, a surface,
etc
Let E consists of the point O which coincides with the origin of a
Cartesian coordinate system Then, the corresponding complete system is
the system of radiating spherical wave functions w^„ This system was
analyzed in the previous section We intend now to derive necessary and
sufficient conditions leading to the vanishing of the single-layer potential
in A
In the sequel we will denote the half-plane (p = const by E We will
assume that O is the center of a sphere S^ enclosed in Di and will denote its
interior by D [ For x G P [ , the single-layer potential Ua can be expressed
as a Fourier series with respect to the azimuthal angle ip The Fourier
coefficients u^ = u^(r, 9) are given by
<{r,9)= Y 0nJnikr)Pir^icose), (3.13)
n=|mj
where
/?- = ^2)^„ I a(y)«3 ^„(y)d5(y) (3.14)
Trang 7Let us formulate the vanishing conditions in terms of the Fourier coefficients
lim - 5 - i - l r i = 0 for all m G Z, / > \m\ (3.15)
^-*o {kry and any 6 G [0, TT] Note, that similar conditions can be provided by impos-
ing that Ua vanish at the point x = 0 together with all derivatives Next,
we will prove that the set of vanishing conditions (3.15) implies
/Sr" = 0 for all m G Z and / > |m| (3.16) Fix m and construct
^ = t ^n'i^Pl-^i^^osO) (3.17)
For / = |m| we pass to the limit when r —» 0 and use the asymptotic form
of the Bessel function:
jn{x) = j£^J^" [1 + 0{x')] as X - 0, (3.18)
to obtain
y\m\
/ ? M < | ( c o s 0 ) = O (3.19)
Since the last relation is valid for any 0 £ [0,7r], it follows that 0"^^ = 0
Taking / = |m| + 1 we arrive at /3|^j_j.i = 0 and the same technique can be
used to conclude Thus, condition (3.15) yields t i ^ = 0 in E fi Z)[ for all
m € Z; whence ita = 0 in Di follows The converse result is immediate
Evidently, arguing as in the precedent section the conclusion i^o = 0 in
Di follows directly from the closeness relations for the system of radiating
spherical wave functions However, we would like to draw attention to
the above set of implications since this strategy will be used in the sequel
Vanishing conditions similar to (3.15) will be derived for the system of
distributed spherical wave functions
Let the support of discrete sources be the segment F^ of the 2:-axis
Assume F^ C I>[ and choose a sequence of points {zn) C F^ The support
of discrete sources is depicted in Figure 3.1 Before we state our next
results, let us prove some auxiliary lemmas
LEMMA 1.1: Let u G 5ft(Di) he a solution to the Helmholtz equation in
Di and let u^ be its Fourier coefficients with respect to (f Then, the limit
limw^(r;)/(M''"^^^Z, (3.20)
Trang 84 2
FIGURE 3.1 Illustration of the support of discrete sources
exists and represents an analytic function of z Here {p,(p,z) are the
cylin-drical coordinates ofx and t] = {p^ z) eH
Proof: For x € D[, the Fourier coefficients are given by
Then, using the relation F(|m| — n, |m| -f- n -f 1, |m| +1,0) = 1, we evaluate
the limit when p —• 0 as
lim w-Cr/)/ (M'*"' = v^{z) = f ; a - ^ M , (3.23)
'' n = | m | ('^^)
Trang 9where a!!* = 2"^^^^-^—, M /^r- Now, accounting of the series
repre-"" (n-~|m|)!|m|! "^
sentation of the spherical Bessel function we see that v^{z) is an analytic
function of z
LEMMA 1.2: Let u e 3?(Di) be a solution to the Helmholtz equation
in Di and let u^ be its Fourier coefficients with respect to ip Define v^ by
(3,23)y and assume v^{zn) = 0, n = 1,2, , where {zn) CTz is a bounded
sequence of points Then u — 0 in Dị
Proof: The boundedness of the sequence {zn) implies the existence of
a convergent subsequence {zn^) ^ fc = 1,2, Then, since v^{z) is analytic
and v^{znk) = 0, fc = 1,2, , we use the uniqueness theorem of analytic
function (cf Chilov [28]) to obtain v'^iz) = Oior zeOzD i ) [ , ịẹ
y â^^^^ = 0, for zeOzn D[ (3.24)
Using the technique previously described we arrive at â = 0 for all m € Z
and n > | m | Thus, u^ = 0 in E fl -D[ for all m G Z; whence by the
analyticity of u the conclusion readily follows
We pay now attention to the system of distributed spherical wave
func-tions which form a set of radiating solufunc-tions to the Helmholtz equation
They are defined by
d n W = < | m | ( x ~ ^ n e 3 )
(3.25)
= h\'2i{krn)P):;:)(cosen)ế^'', n = 1,2, , m G Z,
where (r^, 6nr ^) are the spherical coordinates of x^ = x — ^n^a, ịẹ r^ =
p^-^iz- Znf, P,5'(cos^n) = (2|m| - l)!!sinl^' Qn and sin^n = pAn- The
geometrical significance of the above notations is shown in Figure 3.2 We
are now in position to give the main result of this section
T H E O R E M 1.4: Consider the bounded sequence (zn) C F^, where F^
is a segment of the z-axis Assume S is a surface of class C^ enclosing
Tz' Replace in theorem l.ly part (a), the localized spherical wave functions
w^^, n = 0,1, , m = —n, , n, by the distributed spherical wave functions
^^n^ ^ ~ 1,2, , m € Z Then^ the resulting systems of functions are
complete in L^{S)
Proof: We prove only the first part of the theorem Let us establish
the explicit form of the vanishing conditions
C ( ^ n ) = 0, n = 1,2, , m € Z, (3.26)
Trang 10FIGURE 3.2 The vectors Xn and x in the half-plane E
where v^ is given by (3.23) with Ua standing for the single-layer potential
with density a To this end let us consider the ring currents Smi
Smiv, ^y) "^ 27r / ^(^' ^' ^^ ^^P [-J'^i^ - ^y)] d<^» (3-27)
0
where T) = {p,z) and T}y = {Py,Zy), It is readily seen that the Fourier
coefficients of the single-layer potential Ua with respect to <f are given by
<iv) = Ja{y)Sm{v.rjy)exp {-JTrnpy) dS{y) (3.28)
s
Consider now the representation (cf Eremin and Sveshnikov [55])
smirf,vy) = cf: J'y_^^!TL (fci^)-^^'^'-'^4;i,^,(fci?), ^ /!(/ + |m|)!22'+l'"l
(3.29)
where B/^ = p^ + p^ + (z — Zy)"^ and c is a constant Then,
Jim 5„(»7,r7y)/(M''"' = c„/ig,(A;r,)Pg(cosd,), (3.30)
where r^ = Py + {z - ^y)^, sin^^ = Py/r^j and Cm is a constant It follows
that
C ( ^ ) = lim < ( ^ ) / ( M ' ' " ' = c „ | a ( y ) u i ^ | „ , ( y - ^e3)d5(y) (3.31)
Trang 11and we see that (3.26) represents the closure conditions for the system of
functions (3.25) The precedent lemma now conclude the proof of the first
part of the theorem
Next, we formulate the null-field equations in terms of distributed
spherical wave functions
T H E O R E M 1.5: Under the assumption of theorem 1.4 replace in
the-orem 1.2 the localized spherical wave functions u^^^, n = 0,1, ,m =
—n, , n, by the distributed spherical wave functions <;^„, n = 1,2, , m G
Z Let hs solve the resulting null-field equations (3.6) and (3.7) Then hs
solves the general null-field equations (2.83) and (2.87), and conversely
Proof: This is proved in the same manner as theorem 1.4 with the
roles of single-layer potential and scalar fields (3.8) and (3.9) interchanged
As we will see in the electromagnetic case an alternative proof of
the-orems 1.4 and 1.5 can be given by using the translation addition theorem
for spherical wave functions
The above theorems deal with radiating solutions to the Helmholtz
equation These functions are suitable for analyzing exterior scattering
problems However, the conventional scheme can be used to treat interior
scattering problems as well Next, we will present completeness results
for systems of functions consisting in entire solutions to the Helmholtz
equation We begin by considering the function
sinffclx — yl) ^ o /«^^x
which is an entire solution to the Helmoltz equation Let us define the
modified single-layer potential Ua by
Ua{x) - y a(y)x(x,y,A:)dS(y), x € R ^ (3.33)
s
Then the following theorem is valid
T H E O R E M 1.6: Consider Di a bounded domain with exterior Ds and
let the modified single-layer potential Ua y^ith density a be given by (3.33)
Then from Ua = 0 in Di it follows that the single-layer potential Ua with
density a vanishes in Dg, that is Ua =0 in Dg^
Proof: Let 2a(x) = 0, x € A - For x E 5^, where S^ is an inscribed
sphere, we use the expansion
x{y.,y,k) =-J2 XI ^mnttL„„(y)«LW (3.34)
Trang 12and the orthogonality of spherical wave functions to obtain
a{y)y}_^^{y)dS{y) = 0, n = 0,1, , m = - n , , n (3.35)
/ •
Let S^ be a sphere enclosing Di and let us denote its exterior by D^
Multiplying (3.35) by n ^ ^ ( x ) , where x G D ^ , summing over m and n, and
using the spherical waves expansion of the Green functions for |y| < jx|,
we see that the single-layer potential Ua with density a vanishes in D^
Consequently, by the analyticity oi Ua, Ua = 0 in Ds follows The theorem
is proved
We note that similar results can be proved for the modified double-layer
potential Va and the modified combined potential
Wa-As next we will consider systems of functions consisting of entire
solu-tions to the Helmholtz equation A specific scheme for complete systems
construction can be given as follows:
(a) Let { x n } ^ i C E represents the position vectors of the discrete
sources
(b) Let Ua be the modified single-layer potential with density a and let
us consider the set of conditions
(£ua)(xn) = 0, n = l,2, , (3.36) which provide that 2^ = 0 in Df
In this context, let us define the scalar functions Qn by
^n(y) = (£xx)(xn,y) (3.37)
Since
(Cua) (Xn) = J a{y)9n{y)dS{y) = (^n, a*)2,5 (3.38)
dD
we see that the vanishing conditions (3.36) represents the closure relations
for the system{pn}^i- The following theorem is the analog of theorem 1.3
for the system of functions (3.37)
T H E O R E M 1.7: Let S be a closed surface of class C^ Then the system
{^n}^i is complete in L'^{S)
We define the distributed spherical wave functions which form a set of
entire solutions to the Helmholtz equation by
(3.39)
= J|m|(fern)P,5'(cosen)e^-^^, n = 1,2, , m G Z
Trang 13Analogous to theorem 1.4 we can state the following result
T H E O R E M 1.8: Consider the bounded sequence (zn) C F^, where Fz
is a segment of the z-axis Assume S is a surface of class C^ enclosing
Fz' Replace in theorem 1.1, part (b), the localized spherical wave functions
'^mn^ n = 0,1, , m = —n, , n, by the distributed spherical wave functions
^mn^ ^ == 1,2, ,m G Z Then, the resulting systems of functions are
complete in L'^{S)
Proof: For proving the first part of the theorem it suffices to establish
the explicit form of the vanishing conditions
l i m 2 ^ ( ^ ) / ( M ' ' " ' = ^ ( ^ n ) = 0,n = l , 2 , , m e Z (3.40)
Using the representation (cf Eremin and Sveshnikov [55])
oo
lk?00 "l^Z+lml SA'n,riy) = g g ^.(i 4 H ) ! 2 ^ ' + I " ' I (fe^)"^"''""" J2iMmm)
(3.41)
where Sm are the ring currents corresponding to x? we see that
lini 5^(17,y)/ ( M ' " ' = M m | ( ^ r , ) P g ( c o s 0 , ) (3.42)
The proof can now be completed as in theorem 1.4
1.3 Distributed point sources (fundamental solutions)
In this section we will present completeness results for systems of functions
with singularities distributed on closed or open surfaces We debut with
the fundamental solutions
<^n W = Sf(xn, x,A:), n = 1,2, , (3.43) where { x n } ^ i is a set of points distributed on a closed surface of class
C^ Let {<Pn}n=i denote the system of functions with the singularities
{ x ~ } ^ j distributed on the interior surface 5 " and let {v^n}^i denote
the system of functions with the singularities {^n}^=i distributed on the
exterior surface S^ The auxiliary surfaces are shown in Figure 3.3
Com-pleteness results for the system of distributed sources (3.43) are given by
the following theorem
T H E O R E M 1.9: Consider Di a bounded domain of class C^ Let the set
{ x ~ } ^ j be dense on a surface S~ enclosed in Di and let the set {'^t}^=i
be dense on a surface S'^ enclosing Di Assume k ^ p{D^)^ where D^
is the interior of S" Replace in theorem 1.1 the radiating spherical wave
Trang 14FIGURE 3.3 Illustration of the support of distributed point sources
functions u^^, n = 0, l, ,m = —n, ,n, by the functions ip~, n= 1,2, , and the regular spherical wave functions u}^^^^ n = 0, l, ,m = —n, ,n,
by the functions (^^, n = 1,2, Then, the resulting systems of functions are complete in L^{S),
Proof: Let us consider (a) It has to shown that for a G L^{S) the
set of closeness relations
/ a*{y)<p-{y)dSiy) = 0,n = l,2, (3.44)
implies a ^ 0 on 5 Prom (3.44) it follows that the single-layer potential
Ua' with density a' = a* satisfies Uaf{x~) = 0, n = 1,2, Since { x ~ } ^ j
is dense on S" we get Ua' = 0 on S" The assumption k ^ p{D^) gives
Ua' = 0 in D r , and going further, the analyticity of Ua' yields Ua' = 0 in
Di Theorem 2.2 of Chapter 2 may now be used to conclude Repeating
the above arguments for the double-layer potential Va' and the combined potential Wa* = ««' — ^Va' we see that (a) is proved The proof of the
second part of the theorem is similar
The system of functions given by theorem 1.9, part (b), is suitable for approximating internal fields However, for such kind of application we can also use a system of discrete sources distributed on an interior surface These functions are given by
^ n W = x(Xn,x,fc), n = l , 2 , (3.45)