Learning Objectives• 4.1: Define the significance of whistle-blowing and the act itself according to seven criteria • 4.2: Assess situations where whistle-blowing may or may not be justi
Trang 1Ethics and the Conduct of Business Eighth edition
Chapter 4
Whistle-Blowing
Trang 2• Introduction: Whistle-Blowing
• 4.1: What Is Whistle-Blowing?
• 4.2: Justification of Whistle-Blowing
• 4.3: Right to Blow the Whistle
• 4.4: Developing a Policy
• Conclusion: Whistle-Blowing
Trang 3Learning Objectives
• 4.1: Define the significance of whistle-blowing and the act itself according to seven criteria
• 4.2: Assess situations where whistle-blowing may or may not be justified, given the duties and obligations of all
parties and the potential consequences of the act
• 4.3: Describe the characteristics and importance of laws designed to protect whistle-blowers and key points in the debate over the moral justification of these laws
• 4.4: Identify the importance of developing an effective
whistle-blowing policy for an organization and the key
components of such a policy
Trang 4Introduction: Whistle-Blowing
• Time magazine’s persons of the year
• Similarities and differences
• Points to consider
Trang 54.1: What Is Whistle-Blowing?
Objective: Define the significance of whistle-blowing and the act itself according to seven criteria
• What is whistle-blowing?
• Criteria for whistle-blowing
Trang 6Table 4.1: What Constitutes
Whistle-Blowing?
Criteria Whistle-Blowing Not Whistle-Blowing
Who can blow the
What kind of information
importance Exposing matters of minor importance, such as incompetent management
inform individuals or groups outside the organization
Internal: An employee informs others within the organization by going outside normal channels of communication
An employee follows established procedures to report wrongdoing through normal channels of communication
What is the immediate
Was the person compelled
advancement
Trang 74.2: Justification of Whistle-Blowing (1 of 2)
Objective: Assess situations where whistle-blowing may or may not be justified, given the duties and obligations of all parties and the potential consequences of the act
• 4.2.1: Loyal Agent Argument
– Agent and principal
– Limits to agency duties
• 4.2.2: Meaning of Loyalty
– Pertinent questions
– Loyalty
Trang 84.2: Justification of Whistle-Blowing (2 of 2)
Objective: Assess situations where whistle-blowing may or may not be justified, given the duties and obligations of all parties and the potential consequences of the act
• 4.2.3: Conditions for Justification
– Analyzing the situation
– Taking action
– Role-based responsibilities
– Chances for success
Trang 94.3: Right to Blow the Whistle (1 of 2)
Objective: Describe the characteristics and importance of laws designed to protect whistle-blowers and key points in the debate over the moral justification of these laws
• 4.3.1: Existing Legal Protection
– Existing legal protection
– Other federal acts with anti-retaliatory provisions
– Sarbanes-Oxley Act
– False Claims Act
– The 2010 Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act
Trang 10Table 4.2: Legal Protections for Whistle-Blowers
Federal Laws Provisions/Protections
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Prohibits retaliation against whistle-blowers who are
private sector employees, and entitles them to compensation for retaliation
Requires all companies to have confidential reporting procedures
The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA) Prohibits retaliation against any employee who files a
charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) The False Claims Act Entitles whistle-blowers to file a qui tam action against a
company and receive 10–30% of the funds recovered in any suit, plus compensation for legal expenses
The 2010 Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (Dodd-Frank Bill) Strengthens protections in other laws and enforces new provisions for financial markets
Entitles whistle-blowers to monetary awards for violations
of security laws and rules enforced by the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Creates a special SEC whistle-blower office State laws Most protect only state employees
Most specify whistle-blowing procedures and
Trang 114.3: Right to Blow the Whistle (2 of 2)
Objective: Describe the characteristics and importance of laws designed to protect whistle-blowers and key points in the debate over the moral justification of these laws
• 4.3.2: Arguments against Protection
– Encroach on the rights of employer
– Reinstatement
• 4.3.3: Arguments for Protection
– Contribution to the society
– Freedom of speech
Trang 124.4: Developing a Policy
Objective: Identify the importance of developing an effective whistle-blowing policy for an organization and the key components of such a policy
• 4.4.1: Benefits and Dangers
– Benefits and dangers
• 4.4.2: Components of a Policy
– Clearly defined procedure for reporting
– Well-trained personnel to receive and investigate
reports
– Commitment to take appropriate action
Trang 13Conclusion: Whistle-Blowing
• Whistle-blowing is ethical
• Under certain carefully specified conditions
• When revealed in a justified manner