COST MANAGEMENTAccounting & Control Hansen▪Mowen▪Guan Chapter 18 Activity Resource Usage Model and Tactical Decision... Step 3: Identify Predicted Costs and Benefits; Eliminate Irrelevan
Trang 1COST MANAGEMENT
Accounting & Control
Hansen▪Mowen▪Guan
Chapter 18 Activity Resource Usage Model and Tactical Decision
Trang 23 Explain how the activity resource usage
model is used in assessing relevancy.
4 Apply the tactical decision-making
concepts in a variety of business
situations.
Trang 3Tactical Decision Making
Steps of the tactical decision making process
1 Recognize and define the problem.
2 Identify alternatives as possible solutions to the
problem, and eliminate alternatives that are not feasible.
3 Identify the predicted costs and benefits
associated with each feasible alternative
Eliminate the costs and benefits that are not
Trang 4Tactical Decision Making
4 Compare the relevant costs and benefits for
each alternative, and then relate each
alternative to the overall strategic goals of the firm and other important qualitative factors.
5 Select the alternative with the greatest benefit
which also supports the organization’s strategic objectives.
Continued from previous slide
Trang 5Each year 25 percent of the harvest by an apple
processor is small and odd-shaped.
These apples cannot be sold in the normal
distribution channels and have simply been
dumped in the orchards for fertilizer.
What should the firm do with these apples?
Step 1: Define the
Problem
Tactical Decision Making
Trang 6Step 2: Identify Feasible
Alternatives
Tactical Decision Making
• Sell the apples to pig farmers.
– Eliminate: not enough local farmers
• Bag the apples in five-pound bags and sell them to local
– Eliminate: major capital investment required
• Continue with the current dumping practice.
– Eliminate: status quo
Trang 7Step 3: Identify Predicted Costs and
Benefits; Eliminate Irrelevant Costs
Tactical Decision Making
Bagging Alternative
5 lbs of apples per bag
Cost: $0.05 per pound for labor
and materials (bags and ties)
Revenue: $1.30 per bag
Revenue: $0.78 per can
Trang 8Step 4: Compare Relevant Costs and
Relate to Strategic Goals
Tactical Decision Making
Net benefit per lb
$0.25 Forward
integration strategy
Product differentiation strategy
Trang 9Step 5: Select Best
Alternative
Tactical Decision Making
• The apple producer is reluctant to follow a forward integration strategy
• The bagging alternative should be chosen
Trang 10Tactical Decision Making
continued
Trang 11Tactical Decision Making
Continued from previous slide
Trang 12Tactical Decision Making
Continued from previous slide
Trang 13Relevant Costs and Revenues
• Relevant costs
– future costs that differ across alternatives
• Irrelevant Costs
– Past costs: already incurred “ sunk costs ”
are the same across alternatives; ignore
Trang 14Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity Resource Usage Model
• Flexible Resources
– Easily purchased in the amount needed
– Purchased at the time of use
• Committed resources
– Purchased before they are used
Trang 15Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity Resource Usage Model
• Flexible resources
– The activity resources demanded equal the resources supplied
Trang 16Demand decrease
Trang 17Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity Resource Usage Model
A company has five manufacturing engineers who supply a capacity of 10,000 engineering hours (2,000 hours each).
The cost of this activity capacity is $250,000,
or $25 per hour The firm expects to use
9,000 hours.
If the firm decides to reject a special order
requiring 500 hours, the cost of engineering
Trang 18Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity Resource Usage Model
The firm can purchase a component that will
drop the demand from engineering hours
from 9,000 to 7,000.
Since engineering activity capacity is
acquired in chunks of 2,000, the company
can lay off one engineer or reassign the
engineer to another plant.
Trang 19Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity Resource Usage Model
Trang 20Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Assumptions of C-V-P Analysis
1 The analysis assumes a linear revenue function and a
linear cost function.
2 The analysis assumes that price, total fixed costs, and
unit variable costs can be accurately identified and
remain constant over the relevant range.
3 The analysis assumes that what is produced is sold.
4 For multiple-product analysis, the sales mix is assumed
to be known.
5 The selling price and costs are assumed to be known
with certainty.
Trang 21Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
• Common Decisions
– Make or Buy
– Keep or Drop
– Special Order
– Sell or Process Further
• Cost analysis informed by
– Activity-based cost management system
Trang 22Talmage Company produces a mechanical part used in one of
its engines (Talmage produces engines for snowblowers.) An
outside supplier has offered to sell a part (Part 34B) for $4.75
The company normally produces 100,000 units of the part each
year
Make-or-Buy Decision
Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Trang 23Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Make-or-Buy Decision
Trang 24Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Make-or-Buy Decision
Functional: make the part
Trang 25Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Keep-or-Drop Decision
If a segment is dropped only the traceable revenues and costs should vanish
ABC classifications
Trang 26Dropping the product saves $45,000!
Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Keep-or-Drop Decision
Trang 27Accept or reject a special order
Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Polarcreme, Inc., an ice-cream company, is operating at 80
percent of its 20 million half-gallon capacity
A distributor from another geographic region offered to buy 2
million units of premium ice cream at $1.75 per unit
Distributor will provide their own label and pay transportation
costs This sale is not subject to a sales commission
Impact of special order on non-unit level activities:
Trang 28Special order unit revenue $1.75
Unit-level variable costs:
Accept or reject a special order
Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Trang 29Joint products have common
processes and costs of
production up to a split-off
point.
Sell or Process Further
Illustrative Examples of Tactical Decision Making
Joint products withcommon processesand common costs
Decision: Sell “Grade A” tomatoes as produce or process into
hot sauce 1 lb tomatoes yields 1 bottle of hot sauce
Trang 30Differential Amount
Process further
Trang 31COST MANAGEMENT
Accounting & Control
Hansen▪Mowen▪Guan
End Chapter 19